Is it possible to disable core bundles of Symfony 2, such as the Monolog logger?
I am working on an application which doesn't have many fancy requirements except that it should be ultra fast and as much lightweight as possible. I guess Symfony 2 is not the best framework to go with in my situation, but for me it uses the best principles there are, it is a pleasure to work with and also there are many bundles I might take advantage of later on.
So, my question is as in the title, is it possible to completely disable logging (in the production environment at least), and if it is, would it be possible to disable other such features as well?
P.S.: I understand that the easiest and cleanest way to disable a bundle is to remove it from the kernel, but what happens with the code which uses it?
Actually, Symfony2 is perfect for what you want. As it is a decoupled framework, you can just include the features you want. You can disable monolog from config files.
Also, there is Silex, a micro-framework built with Symfony components, designed to be lightweight and fast for relatively small jobs.
Related
Problem:
I’m unsure how to set up multi client application for Symfony so that we would not violate Symfony's best practices and work against the framework.
I would like to have one main Core namespace which would contain all the base model classes. Right next to the core I would like to set up client specific namespaces which would be used, based on client regional setting. For example LocalUS for US market, LocalUK, for UK market etc.
The Local* namespaces should take first priority for including twig templates, and as a fallback use core common shared views (as I understand, this is solvable via twig namespaces). Same goes for controllers and models - these are probably solvable via extending the Core namespaced classes? Is this all solvable via routing and providing paths for these Local* controllers?
I was looking up on github to see if there are any project that have similar setup but I couldn’t find anything.
A little background:
We have an older legacy PHP Application which was built in-house from ground up using plain PHP. As the application has grown over time, it has become hard to maintain good code quality and standards. It’s also very time consuming to teach new developers our application logic, since the application basically follows no standard design patterns and just does it’s own thing. A lot of the underlying code which handles routes, controllers etc seems to work like “magic” that nobody really dares to touch.
It is because of that we would like to migrate our application to Symfony3 framework. I’ve read some articles about the overall process of migrating legacy applications to symfony, and managed to do it with silex pretty well. Silex, however is a bit too lightweight, I found that the assetic service provider had a lot of functionality missing (twig namespacing etc), and decided it would be best if we could move to a full stack symfony framework instead.
Look into Symfony bundles - they do exactly what you need. You create a "base" bundle, than extend it with other bundles. That's how FOSUserBundle works - it provides everything you need, than you extend it and overwrite it.
We have pretty big application which has about 8 modules (big modules) written using Zend framework 1 and it has been developed for more than 3 years by couple of developers. Also it has a high traffic everyday. We use Amozon s3, Sphinx, Memcache, and some other third party services as well.
Is it a good idea to migrate it to Zend framework 2 ? Because as we went through the doc briefly, it seems Zend framework 2 has been re-written completely. Therefore we think we won't be able to migrate the application easily rather than re-writing the application according to ZF 2.
Valuable ideas would be highly appreciated.
You are correct that ZF2 is a completely different animal. So different, in fact, that there's no one-size-fits-all migration plan/strategy.
However, I recently did a similar migration. It's a fairly complex line-of-business application originally written over approximately 18 months, with a bunch of varied functionality. The main drivers for the decision were the improvements in the module and event systems.
In our case, it turned into a major point release for the product, which ended up including a bunch of UI changes along with all the plumbing.
Assuming you liked ZF1, the good news is that ZF2 is much better framework (as a framework). The ModuleManager, EventManager, Di, and ServiceManager components (and the general MVC-related stuff) are really great, once you grok them. The bad news is that they're a complete departure from ZF1. So you're at the very least signing up to completely overhaul your dispatch and routing, you'll be saying goodbye to Zend_Registry (ServiceManager/ServiceLocator are a huge improvement).
The other bit of good news is that you can almost certainly keep all the old ZF1-type components around for as long as you need them. So if you're relying on Zend_Cache, Zend_Log, Zend_Mail, etc, a little bit of fiddling with autoloader configs should make that possible.
What I'm suggesting is that if you do take the plunge, consider just migrating to ZF2-as-a-framework first, and worry about ZF2-as-a-component-library later.
If you've stuck with the fat-model/skinny-controller paradigm, it's probably feasible to just replace the Controllers, Front-Controller, Zend_Application stuff in a fairly straight-forward way. Once you get that into production, you can then work on removing dependencies on ZF1 components as time permits. In my case, there wasn't much of that, as things were pretty well factored and wrapped (so, for example, moving from Zend_Cache to Zend\Cache was trivial)
Finally, you should know up-front that View-layer stuff (mostly the helper-related stuff) is different too. If you have a bunch of complicated view-related stuff (partials, custom view-helpers, etc) all over the place, you need to anticipate either rewriting them, or finding a way to use the old Zend_View stuff in ZF2 so you can migrate piecemeal. I didn't really deal with this because our interfaces were fairly simple and we took it as an opportunity to overhaul the UI.
Just my $0.02, but I hope it helps.
There is no quick and easy way to migrate because ZF2 is very different from ZF1.
Related: Step by step migration from Zend Framework 1 to 2
I would like to try Silex but i've some questions.
I know to use Symfony2 and i would like to know if Silex is very different of Symfony or it's the same thing (same operation, same code... ) ?
Moreover, Silex is recommanded for small PHP projects and Symfony for medium or big projects , it's true ?
A few things worth noting:
Silex is based on the Symfony2 components, just like the Symfony2 framework is. As such, it can be considered an alternative user interface to the components (the user being a web developer).
Since they use the same basis, migration between them should be relatively easy.
Just like Symfony2, Silex is mostly a controller framework. It provides you with some structure, but the model and view parts are handled by third-party libraries (such as Twig or Doctrine).
Since your business logic should not be in your controllers anyway, if you separate that code out and keep your controllers light, the limiting factor in terms of project size will only be the amount of routes you have.
That said, Silex will not give you the bundles that Symfony2 has.
Here are some interesting thoughts on when to use Silex (especially in the comments):
https://web.archive.org/web/20160131151109/http://www.testically.org/2011/10/11/is-there-a-specific-situation-when-to-use-a-php-micro-framework-like-silex/
Silex itself is pretty bare, which means that if you want more then just routing and tests you will need to add specific features (DB, Twig ...) in form of Services.
I recommend to take a look at some readymade Plates that provide you with this:
https://github.com/lyrixx/Silex-Kitchen-Edition
or
https://github.com/ivoba/superleansilexplate (thats mine :))
Another point is that Silex has a probably lighter footprint than Symfony2, so if you need a smaller & faster site, Silex is worth a consideration.
(UPDATE) Since Symfony 2.8 You can use symfony 2 as a microframework with a micro kernel controller. See short description here: symfony.com/blog/new-in-symfony-2-8-symfony-as-a-microframework. Now Symfony gives us more control over the structure and architecture. Good alternative to Silex if You prefer the Symfony 2 style.
Comparing Silex to Symfony before 2.8 release
Silex microframework is based on Symfony but it's not exactly the same thing. Using a full-stack framework such as Symfony for a small project is simply overkilling the project.
In a microframework, you have more flexibility to choose the tools you want to use. You can make more decisions about application architecture and logic.
In a full-stack framework with some extend you would have an architecture and a logic already predefined with restrictions and limitations to its configuration.
Silex was designed to build up the tool rather than get the set tools that you might not need. I would say that for small projects in Symfony you would have to remove features - were in Silex you would have to add them.
It is also not true that Silex isn't fit for larger projects. Silex can be used with success for larger projects but remember that you would have to build up your tools to fit your requirements (if you need to customize the architecture and logic - perhaps this is the right way to go). Other than that, I would consider using Symfony instead, because Symfony already has bunch of tools available out of the box.
Bear in mind that:
To conclude, Silex is good for smaller applications and for those, it can surely replace Symfony. Silex can also be used for larger projects (but for larger applications I would recommend to use full-stack framework instead, like Symfony).
Reference for slides at: http://www.slideshare.net/dustin.whittle/silex-from-micro-to-full-stack . If you feel like it, go ahead and read some more about the Silex framework.
I also recommend watching this intro comparing Silex to Symfony: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDVtnsoOysE.
Again, a few Pro for using Silex coming from people who actually use it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJcdHGJFfLU
Silex is good for small projects, but it can be used for big projects as well. What I like the most of Silex is that I have complete control over my project structure but it's my responsibility if my project is well organized or not.
Also I recommend it over symfony if like me, you moved your application logic to the client side using a JS framework. For me it feels an overkill to use symfony only to serve a few json requests.
Silex is based on the independent Symfony2 components and isn't truly considered a full-stack web application framework like Symfony is. You should only use it for very small projects that only require a few files, or you'll outgrow it pretty quickly.
Silex is a great framework for small as well as big applications. Giving structure to the project is your responsibility in Silex. As the project becomes larger, you can nicely integrate symfony components into it although the documentation for the symfony provider is not so good especially for symfony security component.
Silex is great for prototyping projects. If you know you will be using most of the symfony components then go for symfony because you will end up with integrating almost all symfony components into silex.
In my case I needed speed right out of the box and silex provided me with the speed and although I am using most of the symfony components, it is a lot faster than symfony out of the box.
At the moment I write this, Silex is in maintenance mode and it's end of life occured in June 2018.
Which means you shouldn't use it anymore for new projects.
They recommend you to use Symfony 4 instead.
Silex was really good and fast (maybe faster than symfony 4 for simple requests/requirements), but SF4 may bring some new stack and benefits to our applications.
Update: However, in all of my attempts on migrating from Silex to Symfony 4, the simple services took 4x times more to respond no matter what I do. Silex seems to do a much better job for simple micro services.
Silex is a PHP microframework. It is use for the small project.The coding style of the symfony and the silex is almost similar to the symfony.But the symfony is use for the large projects
I've got a huge site that has been written (in a very bad way) in symfony 1.4
now, I've been asked to make some substantial changes to the navigation flow, add some features and so on..
considering the effort, I was wondering if it would be better to take the radical decision to port the entire website to symfony 2.0, but I'm not sure how hard that it could be.
Has anybody ever done this before?
Do you have any suggestion to make for patterns to follow, or tutorials or doc or whatever?
You may wrap your legacy project in a brand new sf2 project, by using this bundle. This way, you'll be able to migrate your project one piece at a time, and new functionalities may be developed with sf2 as soon as you get the wrapper to work.
You may be interested by this post about migrating
Here's how I would go about it:
You need to learn and study some things first:
HTTP fundamentals
PHP namespaces, which are heavily used
Symfony2 documentation
Symfony2 documentation
Symfony2 documentation
PHPUnit documentation
Then when you get the hang of Symfony2, you need to find out what to reuse from your old project:
Models, business logic?
Did you use Doctrine in symfony? If yes, look at how to port your entities to Doctrine2, and learn about the differences. If you used Propel, I would look at switching to Doctrine2 and not use the PropelBundle, atleast until you get used to Symfony2. You can find better documentation and sample code out there for Doctrine2.
You also need to convert your old helpers classes to Symfony2 services.
Views?
Symfony2 uses Twig as templating engine, but you could go with pure PHP.
Controllers?
This should feel somewhat similar to symfony. The flow of Symfony2 matches the HTTP flow, meaning you get a Request object and must reurn a Response object.
It really depends on how well structured our old project is. Symfony2 is an entirely different beast than 1.0-1.4. I would probably not call it a port, but a rewrite - however, if your old project is well structured you could probably reuse quite a bit.
Without actually seeing your code, it's impossible to give a good answer on how hard it would be. It's very much doable, but there is no easy route. Symfony2 is, IMHO, the way of the future for PHP projects and in the end you will get a project that is much easier to maintain and support.
I'm not sure if this is possible, but let's say you want to build a CMS, but you're torn between 2 frameworks because each has some features that you like. Is it possible to create the CMS with both framewoks? Does this approach have merits or pitfalls?
Speaking strictly about the Zend Framework (ZF) I would say yes. ZF components are written to be as independent from other components as possible. I would say that it would not be very difficult (It may actually be quite common) to integrate libraries of ZF into other frameworks like Cake, Symfony, or Codeigniter.
Is it possible to create the CMS with both framewoks?
While it's possible to use components from the Zend Framework inside other Frameworks / CMSs - this may be the case with other component libraries as well, but Zend's the most modular one that I know - It's usually not a good idea to mix two full-blown Frameworks.
Many central functions like MVC structures, URL routing, the database layer, Unit testing, error management and so on are by nature unable to be served by two frameworks at once without massive friction. Also, you're likely to get problems when one of the frameworks needs to be updated.
I would recommend to pick the framework that covers most of what you need, and try and add the missing features using plug-ins or own modifications.
Your question is too abstract.
For instance Zend Framework is more to be a library of specific functionalities ready-to-be-include into Your codebase then some closed development environment like for instance Symfony framework.
Thanks to it can be ZF simply included into your codebase (and Symfony too).
Symfony Framework compared to it is closed solution depending on front server environment so you cannot use it like some other framewor's slave.
It would really depend on which things you liked about both...
Zend Frameowrk is more like a library, so you can pick and choose components from it. Symfony also has some re-usable components you can use.
Really, you can do anything... it just depends how much work you want to do, and how willing you are to modify the framework code. Note: most other PHP frameworks are not nearly as flexible as Zend Framework (next up probably being Symfony).
This sounds very messy, so I'd advise against it, unless you use it in the fashion I've described above. It's easy to pull ZF or Symfony components into other frameworks, but not the other way around.
Hope this helps.
The composability of most frameworks is such that that is most likely to give you all the disadvantages of both, while simultaneously eliminating most of the individual advantages of both.
It seems to me like one framework will for serve as the core - bootstrapping, MVC stack, routing - while the other will be used to pull in specific functionality - like classes for forms or filtering or interacting with web services, etc.
As much as I prefer Zend Framework for the core - and most everything else - its use-at-will architecture argues for making the other framework the core and pulling in ZF components where you need them.
As #Adrian notes, it's easy to pull in ZF components into a project built primarily on another framework, since ZF is designed with that flexibility in mind. Other frameworks are less accommodating in this regard.
You can do it. Most modern frameworks (Zend, symfony, flow) is capable to use parts of other frameworks. Symfony 2 uses Zend Logger, flow3 uses sfYaml... It is possible tu interchange some components.
But, imho, you should stick to one framework as a core, and use second only to relatively isolated subsystems. Adapter and Facade design patterns can help you to mix them together - some components / clases demands some wrapping before use in non-native environment.
For further reading: http://www.symfony-project.org/book/1_2/17-Extending-Symfony#chapter_17_integrating_with_other_framework_s_components
Of course it is possible and I don't see something wrong with it. For example I used CakePHP and Zend on a relatively large Project which was kind of a cms. CakePHP for the core (Routing, MVC) and Zend for some "Modules". Mainly for PDF, E-Mail (smtp), FTP and a few others that CakePHP was not that good at. With Cake it was fairly easy to use ZF components and didn't feel hacky at all.
In fact, ZF was written to be as independent as possible, so that you can use any component at any time anywhere. Yet, it would not work the other way round (Using ZF as core, and Cake components). Surely it is possible, but a real pain with no benefits. So ZF could be used propably inside of pretty much any other framework and nothing would be wrong with it, imho.