I have Php based Application. which works perfect with login and password. Now i want to implement authenticate using OpenSSL along with login and password.
I have generated the OpenSSL in Linux server and i have to use the generated openSSL.cert file as certificated. I installed that in my browser and my DNS is set with https so it should promte for certificate,
Now what i need is, When somebody tries to login wihtout certificate it should not now allow to login. I should check the certificated to authenticate the login.
Is they any way to do this or am i being more ambitious ?
if yes, How can i do this i php ?
Thanks all.
SSL uses Diffie-Hellman (or similar) key exchange to negotiate a connection meaning that the certificate is provided to any client that does not already have it. What you want to do is probably best done by using a license key file. Were I doing it I should create a hashed key using something company specific that only I knew and have the string passed across to authenticate. The benefit of it over preventing key exchange in SSL and sending out certificates is that the hashed string is easier to create on a per client basis. This means that you can uniquely identify a client easily and give specific limitation, such as an expiry time, by client.
Related
If an app is interacting with server api over https using post method ( JSON objects ), then there is a danger of api endpoint getting exposed and anyone accessing the api.
Is there a way to make sure that api is called only from the designated app.
I did some research on the web and came to know of:
a. manual credential checking using POST method
b. using json web tokens ( jwt)
However my question is: both of these methods a) & b) would require some kind of username/passwd passing from client app to server ( everytime in a. and only once in b.). Now this username/passwd would need to be hardcoded in apk and it can be easily obtained by anyone by decompiling it. So then how are these methods secure?
I think you're misunderstanding how json web tokens or bearer tokens work. Why would a username and password ever need to be hardcoded? You'd supply the user with an interface that accepts a username and password.
In option a, you'd store these locally after the user supplied their credentials and clear it when they exit the application or log out. This would not be recommended as that's what tokens can be used for. Many frameworks already offer support for JWT out of the box.
If using a token, the user still supplies their username and password to authenticate, the server will return a valid authorization token. From that point forward the auth token is passed with each request.
I would somehow use TLS security ... with digital certificates ... to cryptographically secure the network access to the portal. The app would contain the necessary public certificate, possibly obfuscated, which the server could check to make sure that the access is legitimate. Now, no one can intercept the communications, and they can't spoof it without somehow first extracting the certificate information from the app, which is probably unlikely. Knowing that the supplicant does possess a copy of the necessary public key should be sufficient authentication.
Although we don't usually employ it when we use TLS to get to your friendly neighborhood https web-site, modules like mod_ssl do provide a complete TLS implementation including the ability to require and to verify a client-side security certificate, without possession of which the connection attempt will be refused. This might be an ideal situation for that.
I have an iPhone app that is using my php api on the server but it is currently open if someone knows the url. I want to make sure that no one can use this API until I am ready to make it a public api (if I even do)
I have read this article but I am unsure what they mean when they say:
[CLIENT] Before making the REST API call, combine a bunch of unique data together (this is typically all the parameters and values you intend on sending, it is the “data” argument in the code snippets on AWS’s site)
I don't understand how if I hash the parameters I plan on sending with my api secret how this is more secure than just hashing the api secret if I send the parameters/values unencrypted.
HTTPS the API and use an API key. Then you'll know that only people (you in this case) with the key can have access to the API.
You're correct about it not being more secure. That's why I suggest you SSL the connection. Unless you plan on encrypting everything you transmit back and forth.
The public/private key scenario will also work well. HTTPS requires very minimal effort.
Digital signatures provide a way of validating a message sent over an insecure connection.
Setup: each client will have its own private key and public key (only the private key needs to be stored on the client). The server will store the public keys for each client. The public key can be visible to all and can be used by the server to identify the client. The private key, known only to the client, it is never shown to anyone.
The client signs the request: along with the rest of the request data, the client will hash the combined request data and encrypt the hash with the private key. The server will generate the hash the same way (leaving the signature out of the hash calculation), then decrypt the signature using the public key. If the hashes match, the request is authentic.
Note that HTTPS allows for client certificates, so you can leverage existing tools to accomplish all of the above without writing a single line of server-side code (you just have to configure your web server; the only trick is to make sure the server only accepts certificates it already has). Moreover, the amount of client side code should be minimal: you shouldn't need to do much more than set the connection to use the client certificate. Since you're controlling the clients, you can use self-signed certificates and add the server as a certificate authority. There are a number of questions on SO about using client certificates in iPhone apps; you can start by reading through them.
Note also that any scheme to protect the web API only works so long as copies of the app are in trusted hands. Should anyone untrustworthy get ahold of it, they can use the app or extract any secret data used by the app and access the API as they will.
For development purposes you can just use your web server settings to allow requests from your ip only.
I have an iPhone app that is using my php api on the server but it is currently open if someone knows the url. I want to make sure that no one can use this API until I am ready to make it a public api (if I even do)
I have read this article but I am unsure what they mean when they say:
[CLIENT] Before making the REST API call, combine a bunch of unique data together (this is typically all the parameters and values you intend on sending, it is the “data” argument in the code snippets on AWS’s site)
I don't understand how if I hash the parameters I plan on sending with my api secret how this is more secure than just hashing the api secret if I send the parameters/values unencrypted.
HTTPS the API and use an API key. Then you'll know that only people (you in this case) with the key can have access to the API.
You're correct about it not being more secure. That's why I suggest you SSL the connection. Unless you plan on encrypting everything you transmit back and forth.
The public/private key scenario will also work well. HTTPS requires very minimal effort.
Digital signatures provide a way of validating a message sent over an insecure connection.
Setup: each client will have its own private key and public key (only the private key needs to be stored on the client). The server will store the public keys for each client. The public key can be visible to all and can be used by the server to identify the client. The private key, known only to the client, it is never shown to anyone.
The client signs the request: along with the rest of the request data, the client will hash the combined request data and encrypt the hash with the private key. The server will generate the hash the same way (leaving the signature out of the hash calculation), then decrypt the signature using the public key. If the hashes match, the request is authentic.
Note that HTTPS allows for client certificates, so you can leverage existing tools to accomplish all of the above without writing a single line of server-side code (you just have to configure your web server; the only trick is to make sure the server only accepts certificates it already has). Moreover, the amount of client side code should be minimal: you shouldn't need to do much more than set the connection to use the client certificate. Since you're controlling the clients, you can use self-signed certificates and add the server as a certificate authority. There are a number of questions on SO about using client certificates in iPhone apps; you can start by reading through them.
Note also that any scheme to protect the web API only works so long as copies of the app are in trusted hands. Should anyone untrustworthy get ahold of it, they can use the app or extract any secret data used by the app and access the API as they will.
For development purposes you can just use your web server settings to allow requests from your ip only.
I have an android app that needs to connect frequently to the server to retrive or add in the database sensible data. I needed to verify that the calls to the server where being made from the app so I used this approach: how to verify the identity of the client from the server? which consists in a hardcoded string key in the app that's verified in the server.
But then I realized that there were tools like dex2jar, that would reveal all my code (Even with some obfuscation from proguard) in particular this hardcoded key.
Is there any more elegant and safe way to verify that the server calls are being made from my app?
PS: I'm sorry for the English, clearly I'm not a native speaker.
If it's only your client and your server, you can (and should) use mutually-authenticated SSL without purchasing anything. You control the server and the client, so each should only trust one certificate, the one belonging to the other and you don't need CAs for this purpose.
Here's the high-level approach. Create a self-signed server SSL certificate and deploy on your web server. You can use the keytool included with the Android SDK for this purpose. Then create a self-signed client and deploy that within your application in a custom keystore included in your application as a resource (keytool will generate this as well). Configure the server to require client-side SSL authentication and to only accept the client certificate you generated. Configure the client to use that client-side certificate to identify itself and only accept the one server-side certificate you installed on your server for that part of it.
A step-by-step for this is a much longer answer than is warranted here. I would suggest doing this in stages as there are resources on the web about how to deal with self-signed SSL certificate in Android, both server and client side. There is also a complete walk-through in my book, Application Security for the Android Platform, published by O'Reilly.
You'll normally store that certificate/private-key in a keystore of sometype (a KeyStore if you're using Android) and that keystore will be encrypted. That encryption is based on a password, so you'll either need to (1) store that password in your client somewhere, or (2) ask the user for the password when they start your client app. What you need to do depends on your usecase. If (2) is acceptable, then you've protected your credential against reverse engineering since it will be encrypted and the password will not be stored anywhere (but the user will need to type it in everytime). If you do (1), then someone will be able to reverse engineer your client, get the password, get the keystore, decrypt the private key and certificate, and create another client that will be able to connect to the server.
There is nothing you can do to prevent this; you can make reverse engineering your code harder (by obfuscation, etc) but you cannot make it impossible. You need to determine what the risk you are trying to mitigate with these approaches is and how much work is worth doing to mitigate it.
Have found the following example of OAuth server
http://oauth.googlecode.com/svn/code/php/OAuth_TestServer.php
But it is unclear for me
1. How I should generate certificates
How I should specify access token/access token secret/request token/request token secret,
should they stored in database? Should it regenerated for each request? What else I should store in database?
Where should I implement the verification of Access token?
Please advice
To Generate Certificates, you need to create a CSR (Certificate Signing Request)
If you have access to cPanel, then you can generate a CSR easily. If you don't then you will need to download some software to generate a CSR.
After you have your CSR, you can head over to CACert for a free certificate. However, be warned: not all modern browsers trust CACert, so you might get warnings. If you don't want this, you will have to pay for a certificate from a professional provider, like VeriSign.