I have an iPhone app that is using my php api on the server but it is currently open if someone knows the url. I want to make sure that no one can use this API until I am ready to make it a public api (if I even do)
I have read this article but I am unsure what they mean when they say:
[CLIENT] Before making the REST API call, combine a bunch of unique data together (this is typically all the parameters and values you intend on sending, it is the “data” argument in the code snippets on AWS’s site)
I don't understand how if I hash the parameters I plan on sending with my api secret how this is more secure than just hashing the api secret if I send the parameters/values unencrypted.
HTTPS the API and use an API key. Then you'll know that only people (you in this case) with the key can have access to the API.
You're correct about it not being more secure. That's why I suggest you SSL the connection. Unless you plan on encrypting everything you transmit back and forth.
The public/private key scenario will also work well. HTTPS requires very minimal effort.
Digital signatures provide a way of validating a message sent over an insecure connection.
Setup: each client will have its own private key and public key (only the private key needs to be stored on the client). The server will store the public keys for each client. The public key can be visible to all and can be used by the server to identify the client. The private key, known only to the client, it is never shown to anyone.
The client signs the request: along with the rest of the request data, the client will hash the combined request data and encrypt the hash with the private key. The server will generate the hash the same way (leaving the signature out of the hash calculation), then decrypt the signature using the public key. If the hashes match, the request is authentic.
Note that HTTPS allows for client certificates, so you can leverage existing tools to accomplish all of the above without writing a single line of server-side code (you just have to configure your web server; the only trick is to make sure the server only accepts certificates it already has). Moreover, the amount of client side code should be minimal: you shouldn't need to do much more than set the connection to use the client certificate. Since you're controlling the clients, you can use self-signed certificates and add the server as a certificate authority. There are a number of questions on SO about using client certificates in iPhone apps; you can start by reading through them.
Note also that any scheme to protect the web API only works so long as copies of the app are in trusted hands. Should anyone untrustworthy get ahold of it, they can use the app or extract any secret data used by the app and access the API as they will.
For development purposes you can just use your web server settings to allow requests from your ip only.
Related
If an app is interacting with server api over https using post method ( JSON objects ), then there is a danger of api endpoint getting exposed and anyone accessing the api.
Is there a way to make sure that api is called only from the designated app.
I did some research on the web and came to know of:
a. manual credential checking using POST method
b. using json web tokens ( jwt)
However my question is: both of these methods a) & b) would require some kind of username/passwd passing from client app to server ( everytime in a. and only once in b.). Now this username/passwd would need to be hardcoded in apk and it can be easily obtained by anyone by decompiling it. So then how are these methods secure?
I think you're misunderstanding how json web tokens or bearer tokens work. Why would a username and password ever need to be hardcoded? You'd supply the user with an interface that accepts a username and password.
In option a, you'd store these locally after the user supplied their credentials and clear it when they exit the application or log out. This would not be recommended as that's what tokens can be used for. Many frameworks already offer support for JWT out of the box.
If using a token, the user still supplies their username and password to authenticate, the server will return a valid authorization token. From that point forward the auth token is passed with each request.
I would somehow use TLS security ... with digital certificates ... to cryptographically secure the network access to the portal. The app would contain the necessary public certificate, possibly obfuscated, which the server could check to make sure that the access is legitimate. Now, no one can intercept the communications, and they can't spoof it without somehow first extracting the certificate information from the app, which is probably unlikely. Knowing that the supplicant does possess a copy of the necessary public key should be sufficient authentication.
Although we don't usually employ it when we use TLS to get to your friendly neighborhood https web-site, modules like mod_ssl do provide a complete TLS implementation including the ability to require and to verify a client-side security certificate, without possession of which the connection attempt will be refused. This might be an ideal situation for that.
I have two web applications which need to communicate data between them, for example when an employee is added in Application A, i make a CURL request / POST request ** and pass some of the employee data and Store it in **Application B.
The functionality is working fine, now i want to make the request flow secure, these two application i.e. Application A and Application B are on two different WebServers built on different technologies. One in PHP and Other in Java.
So when a record is added in PHP i send CURL request and save data in java. **The PHP application is built for distribution which would be sent to the end users.**
How i can make sure that the POST requests i send are secure. Any ideas?
How i can make sure that the POST requests i send are secure.
Well, the answer depends. Who do you want to make the requests secure from? What kinds of attacks are you worried about? I'll go through a few possible vectors here:
The End User
It is impossible to protect against an end user attacking your system.
Given that you're distributing the application to them, and they control the networking stack, it's literally impossible to 100% protect against the user from doing something nefarious.
You could obfuscate the source, and do all sorts of tricks to make it harder, but ultimately if the user has the program, and its running on their hardware, they can do what they want with it. Including attempting to extract encryption or authentication keys from the application.
An External Attacker
To protect against an external attacker without access to either system, there are some steps to take.
Use SSL for the communication.
This encrypts the traffic so that an attacker cannot see or modify the data in transit.
Use certificate pinning
In the application that you ship to the client, include a copy of the certificate that you use for your server. That way you can detect an attacker who tries to masquerade as your server (via DNS spoofing, or other attacks).
Verify SSL Peers.
This forces CURL to check the certificates to ensure they match.
Authenticate the client using secure cryptography
Generate a public key / private key pair. Store the private key on the client, and the public key on the server.
When issuing a request, sign it using the private key, the time of the request.
On the server, when you get the request, validate that the request time is greater than the last seen request (to prevent replay attacks). Then validate the signature using the private key, then store the request time as the last seen request.
Don't roll your own crypto. It won't help. Security Through Obscurity is not security. At least when it involves cryptography...
Here are some points which may result in surity of secure data transfer:
Use of SSL requests will be helpful.
Use an app token which will only known to applications. So while receiving and sending data you verify that token.
Try encrypted data transfer using some mechanism known to applications only, if don't want to use SSL.
Your own Algorithm to encrypt decrypt the request and its parameters, which only the receiving, sending applications will be knowing.
Many more..
I want to send very sensitive data to a webserver by calling a specific php file with data over GET or POST (not sure yet). The data contains 3 values, so I thought of building an own algorithm, but this could be reverseengineered easily and I guess there are far better solutions than those I have.
The difficulty is basically this: When a user buys a inapp purchase for a Windows App he gets access to this server. MS does not offer any OAUTH check like Google does so developers have to implement their own check. Also we don't have any user accounts.
Do you have any ideas on how to restrict users that haven't bought the purchase from accessing this server php file (which is secure)?
There are lots of 'handshaking' methods you could use. One method that has worked for me:
Open the channel to your server
Server sends a string of random characters to the client
Client hashes the string with a known salt and sends this string back to the server
Server compares the returned string with it's own encrypted version of the original string
If they match then the client session is allowed
This prevents someone from doing a replay attack on your server.
If you want to stick with a typical 'web transaction' then use HTTPS (port 443) to handle your encryption. Another alternative would be to use an encrypted socket to a different port.
I have an iPhone app that is using my php api on the server but it is currently open if someone knows the url. I want to make sure that no one can use this API until I am ready to make it a public api (if I even do)
I have read this article but I am unsure what they mean when they say:
[CLIENT] Before making the REST API call, combine a bunch of unique data together (this is typically all the parameters and values you intend on sending, it is the “data” argument in the code snippets on AWS’s site)
I don't understand how if I hash the parameters I plan on sending with my api secret how this is more secure than just hashing the api secret if I send the parameters/values unencrypted.
HTTPS the API and use an API key. Then you'll know that only people (you in this case) with the key can have access to the API.
You're correct about it not being more secure. That's why I suggest you SSL the connection. Unless you plan on encrypting everything you transmit back and forth.
The public/private key scenario will also work well. HTTPS requires very minimal effort.
Digital signatures provide a way of validating a message sent over an insecure connection.
Setup: each client will have its own private key and public key (only the private key needs to be stored on the client). The server will store the public keys for each client. The public key can be visible to all and can be used by the server to identify the client. The private key, known only to the client, it is never shown to anyone.
The client signs the request: along with the rest of the request data, the client will hash the combined request data and encrypt the hash with the private key. The server will generate the hash the same way (leaving the signature out of the hash calculation), then decrypt the signature using the public key. If the hashes match, the request is authentic.
Note that HTTPS allows for client certificates, so you can leverage existing tools to accomplish all of the above without writing a single line of server-side code (you just have to configure your web server; the only trick is to make sure the server only accepts certificates it already has). Moreover, the amount of client side code should be minimal: you shouldn't need to do much more than set the connection to use the client certificate. Since you're controlling the clients, you can use self-signed certificates and add the server as a certificate authority. There are a number of questions on SO about using client certificates in iPhone apps; you can start by reading through them.
Note also that any scheme to protect the web API only works so long as copies of the app are in trusted hands. Should anyone untrustworthy get ahold of it, they can use the app or extract any secret data used by the app and access the API as they will.
For development purposes you can just use your web server settings to allow requests from your ip only.
I have an android app that needs to connect frequently to the server to retrive or add in the database sensible data. I needed to verify that the calls to the server where being made from the app so I used this approach: how to verify the identity of the client from the server? which consists in a hardcoded string key in the app that's verified in the server.
But then I realized that there were tools like dex2jar, that would reveal all my code (Even with some obfuscation from proguard) in particular this hardcoded key.
Is there any more elegant and safe way to verify that the server calls are being made from my app?
PS: I'm sorry for the English, clearly I'm not a native speaker.
If it's only your client and your server, you can (and should) use mutually-authenticated SSL without purchasing anything. You control the server and the client, so each should only trust one certificate, the one belonging to the other and you don't need CAs for this purpose.
Here's the high-level approach. Create a self-signed server SSL certificate and deploy on your web server. You can use the keytool included with the Android SDK for this purpose. Then create a self-signed client and deploy that within your application in a custom keystore included in your application as a resource (keytool will generate this as well). Configure the server to require client-side SSL authentication and to only accept the client certificate you generated. Configure the client to use that client-side certificate to identify itself and only accept the one server-side certificate you installed on your server for that part of it.
A step-by-step for this is a much longer answer than is warranted here. I would suggest doing this in stages as there are resources on the web about how to deal with self-signed SSL certificate in Android, both server and client side. There is also a complete walk-through in my book, Application Security for the Android Platform, published by O'Reilly.
You'll normally store that certificate/private-key in a keystore of sometype (a KeyStore if you're using Android) and that keystore will be encrypted. That encryption is based on a password, so you'll either need to (1) store that password in your client somewhere, or (2) ask the user for the password when they start your client app. What you need to do depends on your usecase. If (2) is acceptable, then you've protected your credential against reverse engineering since it will be encrypted and the password will not be stored anywhere (but the user will need to type it in everytime). If you do (1), then someone will be able to reverse engineer your client, get the password, get the keystore, decrypt the private key and certificate, and create another client that will be able to connect to the server.
There is nothing you can do to prevent this; you can make reverse engineering your code harder (by obfuscation, etc) but you cannot make it impossible. You need to determine what the risk you are trying to mitigate with these approaches is and how much work is worth doing to mitigate it.