How to secure an authentication cookie without SSL - php

I am in the process of creating a login system which uses both sessions (for those who disallow the use of cookies (to agree with the cookie law.. I am using the site http://www.cookielaw.org/the-cookie-law.aspx as a reference)
Now, I have this system for my cookie authentication
function GenerateString(){
$length = mt_rand(0,25);
$characters = '0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz';
$string = '';
for ($p = 0; $p < $length; $p++) {
$string .= $characters[mt_rand(5, strlen($characters) -1)];
}
return $string;
}
$RandomString = GenerateString();
$CookieAuth = $DB->prepare("INSERT INTO cookieauth (Username,RandomString) VALUES (?,?)");
$CookieAuth->bind_param('ss',$_POST['Username'],$RandomString);
$CookieAuth->execute(); // Insert the Authentication Methods into the database
$CookieAuth->close(); // Allow another query/statement
$GetInsertID = $DB->prepare("SELECT ID FROM CookieAuth WHERE RandomString=?");
$GetInsertID->bind_param('s',$Randomstring);
$GetInsertID->execute();
$GetInsertID->bind_result($RowID);
$GetInsertID->fetch();
$GetInsertID->close();
setcookie("Auth[ID]",$RowID);
setcookie("Auth[UName],$_POST['Username']);
setcookie("Auth[RandomString]",$RandomString);
Then to process the cookie:
if(isset($_COOKIE['Auth'])){
$Authenticate = $DB->prepare("SELECT Username,RandomString FROM cookieauth WHERE ID=?");
$Authenticate->bind_param('i',$_COOKIE['Auth']['ID']);
$Authenticate->execute();
$Authenticate->bind_result($RowUsername,$RowString);
$Authenticate->fetch();
$Authenticate->close();
if ($_Cookie['Auth']['UName'] == $RowUsername){
if ($_COOKIE['Auth']['RandomString'] == $RowString){
header("Location: LoggedIn.php");
}else{
die("Possible Cookie Manipulation, Autologin Cannot Continue");
}
}else{
die("Possible Cookie Manupulation, Autologin Cannot Continue!");
}
My overall objective is to provide an auto login feature by using cookies. As people should know they are essentially stored on the hard drive as plain text.. So If i include a randomly generated string which will be changed on further processing each time (then updating the cookie to match the database) is this a reasonably secure way to achieve the task? I mean, I understand that this is not 100% secure due to some users might attempt to manipulate the random string, so I could resort to a salt, random key then use hash_hmac to sha512 the salt+key and save that as the cookie...
My overall question, is the chunks I have provided a semi-secure method to process automatic logins via cookies and can minimize the possibility of some bad guys manipulating the keys to achieve the required data?

Introduction
Why do you want to authenticate cookie when that is exactly what sessions are going ? If you want to change the ID you can easily achieve that with session_regenerate_id as #MarcB has pointed.
My Assumptions
I want to assume i did not understand the question clearly and probably this is what you want to achieve
Store Values to Cookie
Know if such values have been modified
You solved it already
I could resort to a salt, random key then use hash_hmac to sha512 the salt+key and save that as the cookie...
That is exactly the the solution but you need to note that
Session Can Sill be hijacked
PHP has better ways of generating random strings
Imagine the overhead having to updated your mysql table every time for something sessions can easily do for you
using hash_hmac 512 would generate 126 in hex format you need to understand that there is Browser Cookie Limits so i suggest you reduce it to 256
Your Solution Modified
If we are going to use your solution we need some little modification
session_start();
// Strong private key stored Securly stored
// Used SESSION For demo
$privateKey = isset($_SESSION['key']) ? $_SESSION['key'] : mcrypt_create_iv(128, MCRYPT_DEV_URANDOM);
$my = new SignedCookie($privateKey);
$my->setCookie("test", "hello world", time() + 3600);
echo $my->getCookie("test");
Output
hello world
But the Data was stored like this :
This just uses hash_hmac to sign and verify your values and also uses a random variable to make sure the bad guys are not able to build table of possible values because really they don't have to break the hash .. the can just study it can also use a valid one previously used eg.
10 Cookies = AAAA
1 Cookie = BBBB
He can login with valid session and changed cookies from BBBB to AAAA so even if you re not storing to database always include a random argument
You can also still remove the cookies like this :
$my->setCookie("test", null, time() - 3600);
Simple Class Used
class SignedCookie {
private $prifix = '$x$';
private $privateKey;
function __construct($privateKey) {
$this->privateKey = $privateKey;
}
function setCookie($name, $value, $expire, $path = null, $domain = null, $secure = null, $httponly = null) {
$value = $value === null ? $value : $this->hash($value, mcrypt_create_iv(2, MCRYPT_DEV_URANDOM));
return setcookie($name, $value, $expire, $path, $domain, $secure, $httponly);
}
function getCookie($name, $ignore = false) {
if (! isset($_COOKIE[$name]) || empty($_COOKIE[$name]))
return null; // does not exist
if ($ignore === false) {
if (substr($_COOKIE[$name], 0, 3) !== $this->prifix)
return - 1; // modified
$data = pack("H*", substr($_COOKIE[$name], 3)); // Unpack hex
$value = substr($data, 32, - 2); // Get Value
$rand = substr($data, - 2, 2); // Get Random prifix
if ($this->hash($value, $rand) !== $_COOKIE[$name])
return - 1; // modified
return $value;
}
return $_COOKIE[$name];
}
function hash($value, $suffix) {
// Added random suffix to help the hash keep changing
return $this->prifix . bin2hex(hash_hmac('sha256', $value . $suffix, $this->privateKey, true) . $value . $suffix);
}
}
Conclusion
You are not a security expert Just Use so just use SSL (SSL also has its issues but far better) or Look for an existing secure authentication service. #ircmaxell reminded me of Schneier's Law recently :
#Baba: "surprise" is the enemy of security. The ONLY thing that should be secret is the private key. Remember Schneier's Law: Anyone can invent an encryption scheme that they themselves can't break. My answer is based on tried and true cryptographic principles.
well i think you should take to that advice too.

Related

Is this a good approach to "Obfuscate" User ID?

I need to provide users with a unique link that contains their USER ID (please do not suggest usage of UUID etc in this case)
It's not that important, but I still rather make sure it's very difficult to extract the user id or guess the next one etc! (even if it's achieved with security by obscurity...)
I came up with this solution:
// #var $id int|string
function obfuscate_number($id, bool $reverse=FALSE)
{
$changing = (int)substr($id, -1);
$multiplier = '45' . $changing;
$base = 25;
// Obfuscate Number
if($reverse === FALSE)
{
$new = bcmul("$id", "$multiplier", 0);
$convert = bcadd("$new", "$changing", 0);
$obf = base_convert($convert, 10, $base) . $changing;
return $obf;
}
// Reverse to Number
else
{
$deobf = base_convert(substr($id, 0, -1), $base, 10);
$convert = bcsub("$deobf", "$changing", 0);
// Simple Validation
if($convert % $multiplier !== 0) return FALSE;
$number = (int)bcdiv("$convert", "$multiplier", 0);
return $number;
}
}
// For example number 123456 => 5dnpfi6
// After reversing 5dnpfi6 => 123456
// For example number 563 => g81h3
// After reversing g81h3 => 563
If it is possible please help me improve it.
Also I think the chance of collision is 0 here, am I correct?
Possible Solutions
Slow
Hashing, hashing will allow you to send the hash out and without an extremely moderate amount of computations will not be put reversed into the user id. The server would hash, send string to client, client visits webpage, you lookup in a database of some sort matching hash with user id.
Fast (Recommended)
Using AES encryption will allow you to encrypt data that is generally guaranteed to be unbreakable if you follow AES guidelines. So an approach would be to encrypt data with AES and convert to base 64. Send the base64 to the user and when the user clicks the link, you simply just need to convert base 64 to binary, and decrypt. I would say this is considerably faster than the hashing approach.

PHP Function to generate an infinite unique indentifier

I'm making a new project in Zend 3 that requires me to have a unique ID or HASH which I can use in several places later.
I looked at many examples on Google, and could not find a function that can satisfy my requirements because this needs to be 99% unique all the time, and it needs to be able to generate hundreds, millions of "hashes" unique all the time.
The following function caught my attention:
function uniqidReal($lenght = 13) {
// uniqid gives 13 chars, but you could adjust it to your needs.
if (function_exists("random_bytes")) {
$bytes = random_bytes(ceil($lenght / 2));
} elseif (function_exists("openssl_random_pseudo_bytes")) {
$bytes = openssl_random_pseudo_bytes(ceil($lenght / 2));
} else {
throw new Exception("no cryptographically secure random function available");
}
return substr(bin2hex($bytes), 0, $lenght);
}
A simple test:
echo "<pre>";
for($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++)
{
echo $this->uniqidReal(25) .PHP_EOL ;
}
The result:
a8ba1942ad99d09f496d3d564
5b24746d09cada4b2dc9816bd
c6630c35bc9b4ed0907c803e0
48e04958b633e8a5ead137bb1
643a4ce1bcbca66cea397e85e
d2cd4c6f8dc7054dd0636075f
d9c78bae38720b7e0cc6361f2
54e5f852862adad2ad7bc3349
16c4e42e4f63f62bf9653f96e
c63d64af261e601e4b124e38f
29a3efa07a4d77406349e3020
107d78fdfca13571c152441f2
591b25ebdb695c8259ccc7fe9
105c4f2cc5266bb82222480ba
84e9ad8fd76226f86c89c1ac1
39381d31f494d320abc538a8e
7f8141db50a41b15a85599548
7b15055f6d9fb1228b7438d2a
659182c7bcd5b050befd3fc4c
06f70d134a3839677caa0d246
600b15c9dc53ef7a4551b8a90
a9c8af631c5361e8e1e1b8d9d
4b4b0aca3bbf15d35dd7d1050
f77024a07ee0dcee358dc1f5e
408c007b9d771718263b536e1
2de08e01684805a189224db75
c3838c034ae22d21f27e5d040
b15e9b0bab6ef6a56225a5983
251809396beb9d24b384f5fe8
cec6d262803311152db31b723
95d271ffdfe9df5861eefbaa4
7c11f3401530790b9ef510e55
e363390e2829097e7762bddc4
7ef34c69d9b8e38d72c6db29f
309a84490a7e387aaff1817ca
c214af2927c683954894365df
9f70859880b7ffa4b28265dbb
608e2f2f9e38025d92a1a4f03
c457a54d2da30a4a517edf14c
8670acbded737b1d2febdd954
99899b74b6469e366122b658c
3066408f5b4e86ef84bdb3fb9
010715f4955f66da3402bfa7b
fa01675690435b914631b46e1
2c5e234c5868799f31a6c983c
8345da31809ab2d9714a01d05
7b4e0e507dd0a8b6d7170a265
5aa71aded9fe7afa9a93a98c5
3714fb9f061398d4bb6af909d
165dd0af233cce64cefec12ed
849dda54070b868b50f356068
fe5f6e408eda6e9d429fa34ed
cd13f8da95c5b92b16d9d2781
65d0f69b41ea996ae2f8783a5
5742caf7a922eb3aaa270df30
f381ac4b84f3315e9163f169e
8c2afa1ab32b6fe402bf97ba3
a9f431efe6fc98aa64dbecbc2
8f0746e4e9529326d087f828b
bfc3cbea4d7f5c4495a14fc49
e4bf2d1468c6482570612360e
f1c7238766acdb7f199049487
60ae8a1ffd6784f7bbbc7b437
30afd67f207de6e893f7c9f42
dfa151daccb0e8d64d100f719
07be6a7d4aab21ccd9942401b
73ca1a54fcc40f7a46f46afbd
94ed2888fb93cb65d819d9d52
b7317773c6a15aa0bdf25fa01
edbb7f20f7523d9d941f3ebce
99a3c204b9f2036d3c38342bb
a0585424b8ab2ffcabee299d5
64e669fe2490522451cf10f85
18b8be34d4c560cda5280a103
9524d1f024b3c9864a3fccf75
0e7e94e7974894c98442241bc
4a17cc5e3d2baabaa338f592e
b070eaf38f390516f5cf61aa7
cc7832ea327b7426d8d2b8c2b
0df0a1d4833ebbb5d463c56bf
1bb610a8bb4e241996c9c756a
34ac2fdeb4b88fe6321a1d9c3
f0b20f8e79090dcb65195524c
307252efdd2b833228e0c301f
3908e63b405501782e629ac0b
29e66717adf14fb30c626103d
c8abd48af5f9332b322dffad0
80cd4e162bc7e8fb3a756b48c
825c00cec2294061eb328dd97
106205a2e24609652d149bc17
f1f896657fbc6f6287e7dee20
0fbd16ade658e24d69f76a225
4ab3b5eeeda86fa81afba796a
11d34f3d2ffb61d55da560ddb
013d6151bad187906fcc579a4
4509279a28f34bcf5327dd4c0
3c0eb47b3f9dc5a2f794bb9ad
1e6506906f23542c889330836
e7b1c5012390f3c7c48def9f3
d86caa695cb5fa1e0a2ead4cc
But I cannot confirm that this does guarantee me a 99% success rate for my production environment.
If someone can advise me, or provide me an example I would much appreciate it!
Function random_bytes generates cryptographically secure random bytes
For openssl_random_pseudo_bytes add the crypto_strong paramdeter to ensure the algorithm used is cryptographically strong.
Since your requirement is only 99% unique cryptographically secure random bytes will meet your requirement.
This should be a comment, but its a bit long.
There is some confusion over your use of "unique" and "all the time". A token is either unique or it is not. Using a random number generator to create tokens alone is not sufficient to guarantee uniqueness - the whole point of a random number generator is that you don't know what the next value to be generated will be - meaning you also don't know that the next number won't be the same as a previous number. OTOH, using random_bytes() or openssl_random_pseudo_bytes() to generate a token which is "99% unique all the time" seems like a massive overkill.
To work out how unique this is likely to be we would need to know how many tokens will be considered within the populations at any one time (or to be able to calculate this from the expected rate of creation and the TTL).
That you are using large numbers rather implies you have a very good reason for not using the simplest and most obvious unique identifier - i.e. an incrementing integer. Hence the resistance to guessing an existing identifier is clearly critical to the implementation - but again you've told us nothing about that.
Pasting the title of your post into Google turns up your post as the top result - with PHP's uniqid() function immediately after it - yet for some reason you've either not found uniqid() or have rejected it for some reason.
The title of your post is also an oxymoron - In order to define an infinite set of identifiers, the identifiers would need to be of infinite length.
it needs to be able to generate hundreds, millions of "hashes"
....and you want it all to run within the Zend Framework? - LOL.
But I cannot confirm that this does guarantee me a 99% success rate for my production environment.
Why not? You have sufficient information here to confirm that the bitwise entropy is evenly distributed and should know the planned capacity of the production environment. The rest is basic arithmetic.
We are about 8x10⁹ people. Imagine all us access your site once each second needing a unique identifier during a year. You need about 2,52288×10²³ identifiers. If you think your site will be in production about 1000 years, and population get bigger by a 1000 factor you need about 10²⁹ identifiers; so a 32 bytes auto-incremental string is good enough. Add as suffix a pseudo-random 32 bytes string to get a secure 64 bytes identifier. Doing a bit plus you can hash identifiers to create tokens.
Then is easy to write a function to get them.
Edited 2017/04/13
A small sample:
The first thing you need is a pseudo-random strong keys generator. I'll post the function I'm using currently:
<?php
function pseudoRandomBytes($count = 32){
static $random_state, $bytes, $has_openssl, $has_hash;
$missing_bytes = $count - strlen($bytes);
if ($missing_bytes > 0) {
// If you are using a Php version before 5.3.4 avoid using
// openssl_random_pseudo_bytes()
if (!isset($has_openssl)) {
$has_openssl = version_compare(PHP_VERSION, '5.3.4', '>=')
&& function_exists('openssl_random_pseudo_bytes');
}
// to get entropy
if ($has_openssl) {
$bytes .= openssl_random_pseudo_bytes($missing_bytes);
} elseif ($fh = #fopen('/dev/urandom', 'rb')) {
// avoiding openssl_random_pseudo_bytes()
// you find entropy at /dev/urandom usually available in most
// *nix systems
$bytes .= fread($fh, max(4096, $missing_bytes));
fclose($fh);
}
// If it fails you must create enough entropy
if (strlen($bytes) < $count) {
// Initialize on the first call. The contents of $_SERVER
// includes a mix of user-specific and system information
// that varies a little with each page.
if (!isset($random_state)) {
$random_state = print_r($_SERVER, TRUE);
if (function_exists('getmypid')) {
// Further initialize with the somewhat random PHP process ID.
$random_state .= getmypid();
}
// hash() is only available in PHP 5.1.2+ or via PECL.
$has_hash = function_exists('hash')
&& in_array('sha256', hash_algos());
$bytes = '';
}
if ($has_hash) {
do {
$random_state = hash('sha256', microtime() . mt_rand() .
$random_state);
$bytes .= hash('sha256', mt_rand() . $random_state, TRUE);
} while (strlen($bytes) < $count);
} else {
do {
$random_state = md5(microtime() . mt_rand() . $random_state);
$bytes .= pack("H*", md5(mt_rand() . $random_state));
} while (strlen($bytes) < $count);
}
}
}
$output = substr($bytes, 0, $count);
$bytes = substr($bytes, $count);
return $output;
}
Once you have that function you need a function to create your random keys:
<?php
function pseudo_random_key($byte_count = 32) {
return base64_encode(pseudoRandomBytes($byte_count));
}
As random does not mean unique! you need to merge a unique 32 bytes prefix as I suggested. As big number functions are time-expensive I'll use a chunk-math function using a prefix I suppose generated from time to time using a cron function and stored at an environment DB variable and an auto-incremental index also db-stored
<?php
function uniqueChunkMathKeysPrefix(){
// a call to read your db for prefix
// I suppose you have an environment string-keyed table
// and a couple of dbfunction to read and write data to it
$last18bytesPrefix = dbReadEnvVariable('unique_prefix');
// Also you store your current index wich returns to 0 once you get
// a 99999999999999 value
$lastuniqueindex = dbReadEnvVariable('last_unique_keys_index');
if ($lastuniqueindex < 99999999999999){
$currentuniqueindex = $lastuniqueindex + 1;
$curret18bytesPrefix = $last18bytesPrefix;
}else{
$currentuniqueindex = 0;
$curret18bytesPrefix = dbReadEnvVariable('next_unique_prefix');
// flag your db variables to notify cron to create a new next prefix
dbStoreEnvVariable('next_unique_prefix', 0);
dbStoreEnvVariable('unique_prefix', $curret18bytesPrefix);
// you have the time needed to have site visits and create new
// 99999999999999 keys as a while to run your cron to adjust your
// next prefix
}
// store your current index
dbStoreEnvVariable('last_unique_keys_index', $currentuniqueindex);
// Finally you create the unique index prefix part
$uniqueindexchunk = substr('00000000000000'.$currentuniqueindex, -14);
// return the output
return $curret18bytesPrefix.$uniqueindexchunk;
}
Now you can write a function for unique pseudo-random 64 bytes uniquekeys
<?php
function createUniquePseudoRandomKey(){
$newkey = uniqueChunkMathKeysPrefix() . pseudo_random_key(32);
// to beautify the output make a dummie call
// masking the 0s ties
return md5($newkey);
}

Account activator link is a use case for HMAC?

I'm using PHP and need to design the activator link
$data = $user->email;
$key = $user->token; // bin2hex(openssl_random_pseud_bytes(16));
$hmac = hash_hmac( 'sha256', $data, $key );
So, would send to user the follow url
hostname/account/confirm/7c7b0f24eff74902cb07e900b07a0cafc8fccfa5d2704fb92aaf3b91e9774f98
This way is good idea?
If true, sha256 is best choice for hash_hmac() on this situation? Particularly, i would appreciate one string with length <= 24
TL;DR: You don't need to use hash_hmac() for this use case. You can use the token directly.
If $user->token is generated securely (n.b. you want random_bytes(), not openssl_random_pseudo_bytes(), due to collisions in OpenSSL's random number generator), then it's a secure random value and an attacker has no way of knowing it without hacking the table.
Where you'd want to use HMAC
If you want to authenticate some cleartext data sent to your user's email address, you could use HMAC for this purpose.
For example: On registration, if you need to present users with an option (e.g. GDPR consent), you can create the following two URLs tied to the same token, like so:
$hmacYes = hash_hmac('sha256', 'yes', $user->token);
$hmacNo = hash_hmac('sha256', 'no', $user->token);
Then you can have two links for each option, and send the links like so:
* `hostname/account/confirm/yes${hmacYes}`
* `hostname/account/confirm/no${hmacNo}`
And then you can parse out the HMAC value:
if (!preg_match('/^(yes|no)(.*)$/', $urlParam, $matches) {
throw new SecurityException('bad url');
}
$choice = $matches[1];
$hmac = $matches[2];
$recalc = hash_hmac('sha256', $choice, $user->token);
if (!hash_equals($recalc, $mac)) {
throw new SecurityException('bad url');
}
// Now you know $choice is from a genuine user email
However, if you only need challenge-response authentication, then a secure random token is sufficient.

PHP - Create random hash string for email closed loop verification

I am currently working on a project which requires closed loop email verification. As part of the process I need to generate a random hash string which can be appended to a link sent to the user. When they click the link they will be directed to my site at which time the app will confirm the hash and complete the registration process. For all my hashing I have been using:
hash('sha256', $string);
But for this process, I need to seed $string with a random value. I have Zend Framework available and was looking to do something like this:
$crypt = new Zend_Filter_Encrypt_Mcrypt(array());
$hash = hash('sha256', $crypt->getVector());
My question is, is this a viable algorithm for generating random hash codes?
Here is the Zend_Filter_Encrypt_Mcrypt::setVector() method (generates the value returned via getVector():
public function setVector($vector = null)
{
$cipher = $this->_openCipher();
$size = mcrypt_enc_get_iv_size($cipher);
if (empty($vector)) {
$this->_srand();
if (strtoupper(substr(PHP_OS, 0, 3)) === 'WIN' && version_compare(PHP_VERSION, '5.3.0', '<')) {
$method = MCRYPT_RAND;
} else {
if (file_exists('/dev/urandom') || (strtoupper(substr(PHP_OS, 0, 3)) === 'WIN')) {
$method = MCRYPT_DEV_URANDOM;
} elseif (file_exists('/dev/random')) {
$method = MCRYPT_DEV_RANDOM;
} else {
$method = MCRYPT_RAND;
}
}
$vector = mcrypt_create_iv($size, $method);
} else if (strlen($vector) != $size) {
require_once 'Zend/Filter/Exception.php';
throw new Zend_Filter_Exception('The given vector has a wrong size for the set algorithm');
}
$this->_encryption['vector'] = $vector;
$this->_closeCipher($cipher);
return $this;
}
I'm not very familiar with ZF, but something that has the word Encrypt in it just sounds like the wrong approach.
The ->getVector() sounds similar to what the Initialization Vector does in symmetric encryption; the problem is that such a vector doesn't need to be cryptographically safe, just random. For instance, it may well be just implemented as uniqid(mt_rand()) or something.
->getVector() uses mcrypt to first initialize the encryption cipher to know how big the IV should be; this is typically 8 bytes, but it largely depends on the block size of the used cipher. The thing is, you're not encrypting anything; you just want a random sequence.
The better way to get a random sequence is by using openssl_random_pseudo_bytes() with a size of 8 bytes.
In its absence, you could also read from an entropy file such as /dev/random or /dev/urandom. Afterwards you can run it through binh2hex() to generate a hexadecimal string.
Something like this is pretty rudimentary but should work on Linux'y systems:
$rnd = bin2hex(file_get_contents('/dev/urandom', false, null, 0, 8));
As a fallback for Windows, you can still use something like:
$rnd = hash('sha256', uniqid(mt_rand(), true));
You may want to look into ircmaxell's CryptLib which has a fairly comprehensive suite of random generation features. If you use the medium strength random string generator, like so:
$generator = ( new CryptLib\Random\Factory() )->getMediumStrengthGenerator();
$string = $generator->generateString(LENGTH);
The library will use multiple cryptographically secure sources and run them through a mixer to generate a string. It's worth checking into if you just want a simple solution and don't want to recompile PHP with openssl.
See the readme on secure string generation.

Secure Token Process

I am currently in the mist of developing a website using PHP and MYSQL. It is a private website therefore registrations must be allowed using emails. In simple terms if a new user has to be registered, the administrator has to go into the system and add an email address to be registered.
What I want to do is to create a token or a pass value when this does happen.
Here are the steps:
Administrator adds an email to the system
A unique token value is created (e.g. 1234567890)
The token value is then sent to the users email
the user goes on the link provided and enters his email and the token value
If Success - User is allowed to register
If Fail! - Token is regenerated and send again to that email address
What I really want to know is what would be the best practice to create a token and how can we ensure to create a unique token every time an email is registered.
For further security can I ensure that each token only live for a couple of hours. But would this prevent unauthorized access into the system, or this is a bad idea for securing my website?
My thoughts of creating a unique token: Use hashing algorithms that use SALT so the results cannot be predicted or decrypted (Problems with MD5)
Any help or a lead towards the right direction would be greatfull.
I like this method of generating a cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator or (CSPRNG) for PHP. It was written by Scott:
<?php
function crypto_rand_secure($min, $max) {
$range = $max - $min;
if ($range < 0) return $min; // not so random...
$log = log($range, 2);
$bytes = (int) ($log / 8) + 1; // length in bytes
$bits = (int) $log + 1; // length in bits
$filter = (int) (1 << $bits) - 1; // set all lower bits to 1
do {
$rnd = hexdec(bin2hex(openssl_random_pseudo_bytes($bytes)));
$rnd = $rnd & $filter; // discard irrelevant bits
} while ($rnd >= $range);
return $min + $rnd;
}
function getToken($length=32){
$token = "";
$codeAlphabet = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ";
$codeAlphabet.= "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
$codeAlphabet.= "0123456789";
for($i=0;$i<$length;$i++){
$token .= $codeAlphabet[crypto_rand_secure(0,strlen($codeAlphabet))];
}
return $token;
}
?>
In terms of adding a timeout, I recommend taking care of this in the database. Add a column that is called like registration_timeout and then use mysql's addtime() function to set this colmn to the current time stamp + however long you want the timeout to be.
Also keep in mind that temporary email accounts are trivial to use (http://www.mailinator.com , http://www.guerrillamail.com, ect...), so asking for someone to register an email account doesn't mean anything. Further more a user account could end up on http://www.bugmenot.com .

Categories