Laravel's route doesn't see controller's action - php

I'm trying to learn Laravel, and I created controller (using artisan's php artisan controller:make AlbumController). Then, I added some functions there, mainly function parse:
/**
* Parse the album.
*
* #param int $id
* #return Response
*/
public function parse($id)
{
return 'http://api.deezer.com/'.$id;
}
In routes.php I added
Route::resource('album', 'AlbumController');
But when I try to access the parse page (http://localhost/album/parse/123) Laravel returns throw new NotFoundHttpException();.
What did I do wrong?

parse is not an included route in Laravel's resourse controller. Run php artisan routes to see your current route structure.
If you want to use the parse method in your controller you should define the route manually. Add something like
Route::get('album/parse/{id}', ['uses' => 'AlbumController#parse']);
to your routes file.
As an aside, the resource controller can be a handy way to get your CRUD routes up and running but it is good practice to define most of your routes explicitly as your routes.php file is useful documentation for your application and it makes the workings of it much easier to follow.

You need to change the route to
Route::get('album/parse/{id}', 'AlbumController#parse');
More of routing with parameters can you find HERE inside the Laravel Docs
And the docs with some information about Routing with Controllers
An little part of my route to give you an idea of how it could look:
Route::get('/partijen/nieuw', 'PartijenController#nieuw');
Route::post('/partijen/nieuw', 'PartijenController#save_new');
Route::get('/partijen/edit/{id}', 'PartijenController#edit');
Route::post('/partijen/edit/{id}', 'PartijenController#save_edit');

Related

NotFoundHttpException in RouteCollection when routing with additional controller in laravel 5.2

I got this error-->'NotFoundHttpException in RouteCollection.php line 161'..When i try to call my additional controller in laravel 5.2..Already I did php artisan serve to activate localhost:8000..can you please explain the basic layout of routing with controller in laravel?
NotFoundHttpException occurs when no given route is matched to your given request to a certain endpoint/url.
Make sure you are sending the request to the correct url which is correctly defined in your routes.php (web.php for laravel 5.3+) with it's correct verb, (GET, POST, PATCH, etc).
Basic flow goes like this:
In your routes.php, you'd define a route like:
Route::get("/users", "UsersController#show");
then in your Http folder define that given controller with it's name which you referred in above call and anything proceeding # symbol is a callback function which gets called automatically.
So in your http/UsersController.php, you'd have:
public function show(Request $request) {
//Do something with your request.
return "Something"; //could be an array or string or
//whatever since laravel automatically casts it into JSON,
//but it's strongly recommended to use transformers and compact method.
}
For more information try looking at laravel docs, they provide an amazing way to get started tutorial. Laravel Docs

symfony 3 routing with annotations + locale listener - how to avoid duplicate "requirements" for every route?

Clean setup of Symfony 3 framework, added locale listener from here:
http://symfony.com/doc/current/cookbook/session/locale_sticky_session.html
Example action code:
/**
* #Route("/foo/")
* #Route("/{_locale}/foo/", name="foo", requirements={"_locale"="en|ru|tk"})
*/
public function fooAction(Request $request)
{
return new Response('true');
}
This syntax has to be repeated for every action. Is there a way to make it less verbose without using a Bundle? I'd like the requirements portion to reside in a config somewhere, if possible.
Ideally, I would like to move the defaults={"_locale"="en"}, requirements={"_locale"="%allowed_locales%"} part inside the Locale Listener, but from what I've tried, it seems the listener is called after the route has been matched, and so that is not possible, which is really a shame.
Yes, check out How to Use Service Container Parameters in your Routes which is linked from The Locale and the URL in the Symfony Translations documentation, and states:
Read How to Use Service Container Parameters in your Routes to learn how to avoid hardcoding the _locale requirement in all your routes.
You can essentially set those routes in a global parameter like so:
# app/config/config.yml
parameters:
app.locales: en|ru|tk
Then in your route annotations do the following:
/**
* #Route("/foo/")
* #Route("/{_locale}/foo/", name="foo", requirements={"_locale"="%app.locales%"})
*/
public function fooAction(Request $request)
{
return new Response('true');
}
I'm not sure why the documentation only shows that for defining routes in YAML / XML / PHP but it should work just the same using annotations.

Laravel 5 redirect to path with parameters (not route name)

I've been reading everywhere but couldn't find a way to redirect and include parameters in the redirection.
This method is for flash messages only so I can't use this.
return redirect('user/login')->with('message', 'Login Failed');
This method is only for routes with aliases my routes.php doesn't currently use an alias.
return redirect()->route('profile', [1]);
Question 1
Is there a way to use the path without defining the route aliases?
return redirect('schools/edit', compact($id));
When I use this approach I get this error
InvalidArgumentException with message 'The HTTP status code "0" is not valid.'
I have this under my routes:
Route::get('schools/edit/{id}', 'SchoolController#edit');
Edit
Based on the documentation the 2nd parameter is used for http status code which is why I'm getting the error above. I thought it worked like the URL facade wherein URL::to('schools/edit', [$school->id]) works fine.
Question 2
What is the best way to approach this (without using route aliases)? Should I redirect to Controller action instead? Personally I don't like this approach seems too long for me.
I also don't like using aliases because I've already used paths in my entire application and I'm concerned it might affect the existing paths if I add an alias? No?
redirect("schools/edit/$id");
or (if you prefer)
redirect("schools/edit/{$id}");
Just build the path needed.
'Naming' routes isn't going to change any URI's. It will allow you to internally reference a route via its name as opposed to having to use paths everywhere.
Did you watch the class Illuminate\Routing\Redirector?
You can use:
public function route($route, $parameters = [], $status = 302, $headers = [])
It depends on the route you created. If you create in your app\Http\Routes.php like this:
get('schools/edit/{id}', 'SchoolController#edit');
then you can create the route by:
redirect()->action('SchoolController#edit', compact('id'));
If you want to use the route() method you need to name your route:
get('schools/edit/{id}', ['as' => 'schools.edit', 'uses' => 'SchoolController#edit']);
// based on CRUD it would be:
get('schools/{id}/edit', ['as' => 'schools.edit', 'uses' => 'SchoolController#edit']);
This is pretty basic.
PS. If your schools controller is a resource (CRUD) based you can create a resource() and it will create the basic routes:
Route::resource('schools', 'SchoolController');
// or
$router->resource('schools', 'SchoolController');
PS. Don't forget to watch in artisan the routes you created

Laravel get url's route name [duplicate]

In Laravel, we can get route name from current URL via this:
Route::currentRouteName()
But, how can we get the route name from a specific given URL?
Thank you.
A very easy way to do it Laravel 5.2
app('router')->getRoutes()->match(app('request')->create('/qqq/posts/68/u1'))->getName()
It outputs my Route name like this slug.posts.show
Update: For method like POST, PUT or DELETE you can do like this
app('router')->getRoutes()->match(app('request')->create('/qqq/posts/68/u1', 'POST'))->getName()//reference https://github.com/symfony/http-foundation/blob/master/Request.php#L309
Also when you run app('router')->getRoutes()->match(app('request')->create('/qqq/posts/68/u1', 'POST')) this will return Illuminate\Routing\Route instance where you can call multiple useful public methods like getAction, getValidators etc. Check the source https://github.com/illuminate/routing/blob/master/Route.php for more details.
None of the solutions above worked for me.
This is the correct way to match a route with the URI:
$url = 'url-to-match/some-parameter';
$route = collect(\Route::getRoutes())->first(function($route) use($url){
return $route->matches(request()->create($url));
});
The other solutions perform bindings to the container and can screw up your routes...
I don't think this can be done with out-of-the-box Laravel. Also remember that not all routes in Laravel are named, so you probably want to retrieve the route object, not the route name.
One possible solution would be to extend the default \Iluminate\Routing\Router class and add a public method to your custom class that uses the protected Router::findRoute(Request $request) method.
A simplified example:
class MyRouter extends \Illuminate\Routing\Router {
public function resolveRouteFromUrl($url) {
return $this->findRoute(\Illuminate\Http\Request::create($url));
}
}
This should return the route that matches the URL you specified, but I haven't actually tested this.
Note that if you want this new custom router to replace the built-in one, you will likely have to also create a new ServiceProvider to register your new class into the IoC container instead of the default one.
You could adapt the ServiceProvider in the code below to your needs:
https://github.com/jasonlewis/enhanced-router
Otherwise if you just want to manually instantiate your custom router in your code as needed, you'd have to do something like:
$myRouter = new MyRouter(new \Illuminate\Events\Dispatcher());
$route = $myRouter->resolveRouteFromUrl('/your/url/here');
It can be done without extending the default \Iluminate\Routing\Router class.
Route::dispatchToRoute(Request::create('/your/url/here'));
$route = Route::currentRouteName();
If you call Route::currentRouteName() after dispatchToRoute call, it will return current route name of dispatched request.

Laravel get route name from given URL

In Laravel, we can get route name from current URL via this:
Route::currentRouteName()
But, how can we get the route name from a specific given URL?
Thank you.
A very easy way to do it Laravel 5.2
app('router')->getRoutes()->match(app('request')->create('/qqq/posts/68/u1'))->getName()
It outputs my Route name like this slug.posts.show
Update: For method like POST, PUT or DELETE you can do like this
app('router')->getRoutes()->match(app('request')->create('/qqq/posts/68/u1', 'POST'))->getName()//reference https://github.com/symfony/http-foundation/blob/master/Request.php#L309
Also when you run app('router')->getRoutes()->match(app('request')->create('/qqq/posts/68/u1', 'POST')) this will return Illuminate\Routing\Route instance where you can call multiple useful public methods like getAction, getValidators etc. Check the source https://github.com/illuminate/routing/blob/master/Route.php for more details.
None of the solutions above worked for me.
This is the correct way to match a route with the URI:
$url = 'url-to-match/some-parameter';
$route = collect(\Route::getRoutes())->first(function($route) use($url){
return $route->matches(request()->create($url));
});
The other solutions perform bindings to the container and can screw up your routes...
I don't think this can be done with out-of-the-box Laravel. Also remember that not all routes in Laravel are named, so you probably want to retrieve the route object, not the route name.
One possible solution would be to extend the default \Iluminate\Routing\Router class and add a public method to your custom class that uses the protected Router::findRoute(Request $request) method.
A simplified example:
class MyRouter extends \Illuminate\Routing\Router {
public function resolveRouteFromUrl($url) {
return $this->findRoute(\Illuminate\Http\Request::create($url));
}
}
This should return the route that matches the URL you specified, but I haven't actually tested this.
Note that if you want this new custom router to replace the built-in one, you will likely have to also create a new ServiceProvider to register your new class into the IoC container instead of the default one.
You could adapt the ServiceProvider in the code below to your needs:
https://github.com/jasonlewis/enhanced-router
Otherwise if you just want to manually instantiate your custom router in your code as needed, you'd have to do something like:
$myRouter = new MyRouter(new \Illuminate\Events\Dispatcher());
$route = $myRouter->resolveRouteFromUrl('/your/url/here');
It can be done without extending the default \Iluminate\Routing\Router class.
Route::dispatchToRoute(Request::create('/your/url/here'));
$route = Route::currentRouteName();
If you call Route::currentRouteName() after dispatchToRoute call, it will return current route name of dispatched request.

Categories