I created the following route
Route::resource('posts','PostController');
Now I'm trying to create a custom route
Route::get('posts/trashed','PostController#trashed')->name('posts.trashed');
When the link posts/trashed is clicked, it goes to the PostController#trashed, but the controller shows blank page without any errors.
So changed the custom route to
`Route::get('post/trashed','PostController#trashed')->name('posts.trashed');
by simply changing the posts/trashed to post/trashed and the controller works fine.
Can someone explain what the issue is.
Figured it out. Solution was hidden deep inside the Laravel Documentation . https://laravel.com/docs/5.0/controllers#restful-resource-controllers
If it becomes necessary to add additional routes to a resource controller beyond the default resource routes, you should define those routes before your call to Route::resource:
Re-ordering will solve the issue.
Route::get('posts/trashed','PostController#trashed')->name('posts.trashed');
Route::resource('posts','PostController');
The resource route has some routes inside it own.
So this route:
Route::resource('posts','PostController');
contains this route :
Route::get('posts/{post_id}',PostController#show)
So it has conflict with your route
Route::get('posts/trashed','PostController#trashed')->name('posts.trashed');
Solution 1:
bring your route upper than resource
I mean:
Route::get('posts/trashed','PostController#trashed')->name('posts.trashed'); <-- first
Route::resource('posts','PostController');
Solution 2:
As you mentioned use another url (like post/trushed)
Solution 3 :
Add exception for resource.
Route::resource('posts', 'PostController')->except([
'show'
]);
Related
Laravel version has updated and the routes is now expecting an object instead of an id from when i last used it.
My Routes:
When I try to pass over the $item object which the method in the controller wants. I get a 404 not found and my logs aren't returning... meaning the function isn't running. When the $item obj is not passed over the function realizes that a parameter is missing thus the method is recognized by the blade as being the same as the one in the controller.
Calling the edit function in Blade:
Controller Code:
I appreciate any help whatsoever.
The order of your routes is probably wrong
when you first define the show route with /item/{item} and then create with /item/create laravel will think the "create" is the id (or reference)
best way is to have
the index
create
....
show
Code Example correct
Route::get('/', ProductIndex::class)->name('product.index');
Route::get('/new', ProductCreate::class)->name('product.create');
Route::get('/{product}', ProductShow::class)->name('product.show');
Code Example wrong
Route::get('/', ProductIndex::class)->name('product.index');
Route::get('/{product}', ProductShow::class)->name('product.show');
Route::get('/new', ProductCreate::class)->name('product.create');
Hello Everyone I am posting this question because I don't find this anywhere so please try to provide solution for this problem.
Route::get('/product/{Cat_Slug}/{slug}','ProductController#SingleProductShow')>name('SingleProduct.Show');
This is my route and i want to remove 'product' from url and make my url like. www.example.com/productCat_Slug/ProductSubCat_Slug and want to access all related products but when i do this other routes effected.
Make sure your other routes (those affected by your changes) come before this route in routes/web.php, so they are "hit" first.
Route::get('/test', 'TestController#test');
Route::get('/{user}', 'TestController#user');
instead of
Route::get('/{user}', 'TestController#user');
Route::get('/test', 'TestController#test');
Try this
Route::get('/{Cat_Slug}/{Subcat_slug}','ProductController#SingleProductShow')->name('SingleProduct.Show');
After that you will be able to access the values contained in Cat_Slug and Catsub_slug in your controller and make the query you want.
You also have a syntax error close to the route name. use ->name('myRouteName') instead of >name('myRouteName')
After reading the documentation, I still only have a vague idea of what Named Routes are in Laravel.
Could you help me understand?
Route::get('user/profile', function () {
//
})->name('profile');
Route::get('user/profile', 'UserProfileController#show')->name('profile');
It says:
Once you have assigned a name to a given route, you may use the route's name when generating URLs or redirects via the global route function
I don't understand what the second part of the sentence means, about generating URLs or redirects.
What would be a generated URL in the case of profile from the above example? How would I use it?
The best resource is right here : https://laravel.com/docs/5.8/routing#named-routes
One of the common use case is in your views. Say your post request goes to a particular route, basically without named routes you can simply go like this to store a task
action="/task"
but say for example you need to update the route to /task/store , you will need to update it everywhere you use the route.
But consider you used a named route
Route::post('/task', 'TaskController#store')->name('task.store');
With named routes you can use the route like this in your view:
action="{{route('task.store')}}"
Now if you choose to update your route, you only need to make the change in the routes file and update it to whatever you need.
Route::post('/task/now/go/here', 'TaskController#store')->name('task.store');
If you need to pass arguments to your routes, you pass it as arguments to route helper like this:
route('task.edit', 1), // in resource specific example it will output /task/1/edit
All of the view examples are given you use blade templating.
After adding a name to a route, you can use the route() helper to create urls.
This can now be used in your application.
For instance, in your blade templates this may look like:
{{ route('profile') }}
This will use the application url and the route path to create a url.
this is how it looks it:
named route sample name('store');:
Route::get('/store-record','YourController#function')->name('store');
store is the named route here. to call it use route('store')
defining another type of route. this is not named route:
Route::get('/store-record','YourController#function')
you can access this route using {{ url('/store-record') }}
hope this helps
I got this 2 routes in my routes file (web)
Route::get('management/special-fees/add/{userId}', 'Management\SpecialFeeController#create')->name('management/special-fees/add');
Route::post('management/special-fees/add', 'Management\SpecialFeeController#store')->name('management/special-fees/add');
They both share the same name but one is GET and the other is POST, so far so good. But now I want to make an url in my view to open the form, for that I use the method route() like this
route('management/special-fees/add',$user->id )
but when trying to go to the url I get this route
.../management/special-fees/add?5
there is a question mark instead of a "/" so the route is invalid.
I made some tests and I figured out that happens because is trying to go to the POST route instead of the GET one if I change the POST route's url in the web file like this
Route::get('management/special-fees/add/{userId}', 'Management\SpecialFeeController#create')->name('management/special-fees/add');
Route::post('management/special-fees/addSSSS', 'Management\SpecialFeeController#store')->name('management/special-fees/add');
I will in fact get this url
.../management/special-fees/addSSSS?5
So why is the route() method generating a url for the POST route over the GET one? how do I make it to choose the GET route first?
In laravel the routing is prioritized by in the order it is written in your route.php file.
In this case you're writing the Route::post last, which in turn tells Laravel that that one should have the highest priority. Try switching them and the Route::get will have the higher priority.
Like so:
Route::post('management/special-fees/addSSSS', 'Management\SpecialFeeController#store')->name('management/special-fees/add');
Route::get('management/special-fees/add/{userId}', 'Management\SpecialFeeController#create')->name('management/special-fees/add');
I may be wrong, but I think you'll have to re-think route naming. One of the problems route naming helps eliminate is redundant and complex names. For example, if you looked at route:list for Route::resource('something', 'SomethingController') it will have something.index, something.store as route names for Route::get('something') and Route::post('something').
If it's the same name, it will always resolve to the first one and will probably never hit the second route; in your case will hit the POST route and never the GET route.
?5 means 5 is an argument for your get route.
try this
url('management/special-fees/add/'.$user->id)
for get route insted of
route('management/special-fees/add',$user->id )
Been working on a neat little project. I'm using Laravel 5.5, and I'm building routes to handle the various requests. I've got a route that accepts a slug to locate a particular guild via route model binding. Works great! Beautifully, actually. Then, I defined a "static" route that doesn't use a parameter to show the form for creating a new guild. Here's the routes...
Route::get('/guilds', 'GuildController#index')->name('guilds');
Route::get('/guild/{guild}', 'GuildController#show')->name('guild');
Route::get('/guild/create', 'GuildController#create')->name('create_guild');
Route::get('/guild/{guild}/edit', 'GuildController#edit')->name('edit_guild');
Route::post('/guild/create', 'GuildController#store')->name('store_guild');
But when I attempt to navigate to '/guild/create', I get a 404 because a guild with the slug "create" doesn't exist. How can I work around this particular issue?
Try put specific routes first:
Route::get('/guilds', 'GuildController#index')->name('guilds');
Route::get('/guild/create', 'GuildController#create')->name('create_guild');
Route::post('/guild/create', 'GuildController#store')->name('store_guild');
Route::get('/guild/{guild}', 'GuildController#show')->name('guild');
Route::get('/guild/{guild}/edit', 'GuildController#edit')->name('edit_guil');