it appears that when I created a new route, I receive the 404 error when trying to access the url, which is funny,. because all of my other routes are working just fine.
My web.php looks like so:
Auth::routes();
Route::post('follow/{user}', 'FollowsController#store');
Route::get('/acasa', 'HomeController#index')->name('acasa');
Route::get('/{user}', 'ProfilesController#index')->name('profil');
Route::get('/profil/{user}/edit', 'ProfilesController#edit')->name('editareprofil');
Route::patch('/profil/{user}', 'ProfilesController#update')->name('updateprofil');
Route::get('/alerte', 'PaginaAlerte#index')->name('alerte');
Route::get('/alerte/url/{user}', 'UrlsController#index')->name('editurl');
Route::post('/alerte/url/{user}', 'UrlsController#store')->name('updateurl');
Route::get('/alerte/url/{del_id}/delete','UrlsController#destroy')->name('deleteurl');
The one that is NOT working when I am visiting http://127.0.0.1:8000/alerte is:
Route::get('/alerte', 'PaginaAlerte#index')->name('alerte');
The controller looks like so:
namespace App\Http\Controllers;
use Illuminate\Http\Request;
use Auth;
class PaginaAlerte extends Controller
{
public function __construct() {
$this->middleware('auth');
}
public function index(User $user)
{
return view('alerte');
}
}
I am banging my head around as I cannot see which is the problem. It is not a live website yet, I am just developing on my Windows 10 pc using WAMP.
Moved my comment to a little bit explained answer.
So, in your route collection, you have two conflicting routes
Route::get('/{user}', 'ProfilesController#index')->name('profil');
and
Route::get('/alerte', 'PaginaAlerte#index')->name('alerte');
Imagine that Laravel is reading all routings from top to bottom and it stops to reading next one after the first match.
In your case, Laravel is thinking that alerte is a username and going to the ProfilesController#index controller. Then it tries to find a user with alerte username and returning 404 because for now, you don't have a user with this username.
So to fix 404 error and handle /alerte route, you just need to move the corresponding route before /{username} one.
But here is the dilemma that you got now. What if you will have a user with alerte username? In this case, the user can't see his profile page because now alerte is handling by another route.
And I'm suggesting to use a bit more friendly URL structure for your project. Like /user/{username} to handle some actions with users and still use /alerte to handle alert routes.
The following route catches the url /alerte as well
Route::get('/{user}', 'ProfilesController#index')->name('profil');
Since this one is specified before
Route::get('/alerte', 'PaginaAlerte#index')->name('alerte');
The /alerte will go the the ProfilesController instead.
To fix this change the order of the url definitions or change either of the urls to have nesting e.g. /alerte/home or /user/{user}
Well.
Maybe this is too late, but I have all week dealing with this problem.
I made my own custom.php file and add it in the routes path of my Laravel project, and none of the routes were working at all.
This is how I solved it:
You must remember to edit the RouteServiceProvider.php file located in app\Providers path. In the map() function, you must add your .php file. That should work fine!
To avoid unexpected behaviors, map your custom routes first. Some Laravel based systems can "stop" processing routes if no one of the expected routes rules were satisfied. I face that problem, and was driving me crazy!
I would wish suggest to you declare your URL without the "/", like your first "post" route, because sometimes, I have been got this kind of errors (404).
So, my first recomendation is change the declaration of the route. After that, you should test your middleware, try without the construct, and try again.
Good luck!
Related
I'm currently using laravel 5.4 and I have stumbled upon something I can't fix.
I'm currently trying to bind a route to a controller using the Laravel resource helper as such :
Route::resource('campaigns', 'CampaignsController');.
I correctly see my route being there when I do a PHP artisan:route list, I have all my CRUD endpoints tied to the appropriate controller function. Also, note that I'm currently doing that for all my route that need to be tied to a CRUD system ( what I'm working with is mostly form ) without any problem
With this being said, whenever I'm trying to edit a Campaign, I get an error : Class App\Http\Controllers\Ads\Campaigns does not exist
I do not know why it's trying to look for a Campaigns controller while I specify the CampaignsController controller. Everything is behaving correctly in campaigns route, except the edit one. Also, all my other routes have the same logic and never faced this problem.
Any idea why it is looking for the wrong Controller ?
Here's my namespace declaration and folder hierarchy, which is ok ( please note that the adsController has its routes declared the same way and is used the same way too )
here's my edit method
and here's the error
It's quite possible that you try to inject not existing class in your controller.
Take a look at controller constructor or edit route if you don't have something like this:
public function edit(Campaigns $campaigns)
{
}
and make sure you import Campaigns from valid namespace (probably it's not in App\Http\Controllers\Ads namespace.
If it doesn't help try to find in your app directory occurrences of Ads\Campaigns to see where it's used. Sometimes problem can be in completely different part of your application.
EDIT
Also make sure you didn't make any typo. In error you have Campaigns but your model is probably Campaign - is it possible that in one place you have extra s at the end?
Try with Route::resource('campaigns', 'Ads\CampaignsController'); in your web.php file
I'm building enterprise modular Laravel web application but I'm having a small problem.
I would like to have it so that if someone goes to the /api/*/ route (/api/ is a route group) that it will go to an InputController. the first variable next to /api/ will be the module name that the api is requesting info from. So lets say for example: /api/phonefinder/find
In this case, when someone hit's this route, it will go to InputController, verifiy if the module 'phonefinder' exists, then sends anything after the /api/phonefinder to the correct routes file in that module's folder (In this case the '/find' Route..)
So:
/api/phonefinder/find - Go to input controller and verify if phonefinder module exists (Always go to InputController even if its another module instead of phonefinder)
/find - Then call the /find route inside folder Modules/phonefinder/routes.php
Any idea's on how to achieve this?
Middlewares are designed for this purpose. You can create a middleware by typing
php artisan make:middleware MiddlewareName
It will create a middleware named 'MiddlewareName' under namespace App\Http\Middleware; path.
In this middleware, write your controls in the handle function. It should return $next($request); Dont change this part.
In your Http\Kernel.php file, go to $routeMiddleware variable and add this line:
'middleware_name' => \App\Http\Middleware\MiddlewareName::class,
And finally, go to your web.php file and set the middleware. An example can be given as:
Route::middleware(['middleware_name'])->group(function () {
Route::prefix('api')->group(function () {
Route::get('/phonefinder', 'SomeController#someMethod');
});
});
Whenever you call api/phonefinder endpoint, it will go to the Middleware first.
What you are looking for is HMVC, where you can send internal route requests, but Laravel doesn't support it.
If you want to have one access point for your modular application then you should declare it like this (for example):
Route::any('api/{module}/{action}', 'InputController#moduleAction');
Then in your moduleAction($module, $action) you can process it accordingly, initialize needed module and call it's action with all attached data. Implement your own Module class the way you need and work from there.
Laravel doesn't support HMVC, you can't have one general route using other internal routes. And if those routes (/find in your case) are not internal and can be publicly accessed then also having one general route makes no sense.
I'm working with laravel(5.2), and there are a lot routes in my route file.
in fresh install I noticed that it was loading auth routes something like this.
Route::auth();
nothing else was there in routes.php file related to auth routes.
in my file, I've like this one
Route::get('color/event', 'ColorController#index');
Route::post('color/event', 'ColorController#post_message);
...
...
and many others, So I want to load all in laravel way, like Route::color(); and it should load all color related routes
Thanks for you time
you can try this
Route::resource('admin/settings','Admin\SettingsController');
and try this command
$ php artisan routes
Using Route::get(), Route::post() and similar functions is doing it the Laravel way - see the docs here https://laravel.com/docs/5.2/routing#basic-routing
Route::auth() is just a helper function introduced in Laravel 5.2 to keep all auth definitions together.
so, anyone if s/he is looking for same answer, I figured that out.
if you want something like Route::auth(); OR Route::color();//in my case or whatever you want to call it, you need to add custom function in your Router.php file. So solution will look like
//inside Router.php file
public function whatever(){
$this->get('app/', 'AppController#index');
$this->post('app/new', 'AppController#create');
}
and in your route.php file, you can do this.
Route::whatever();
But this is really dirty way to do that
so instead you can extend the base Router and register your router in bootstrap/app.php
$app->singleton('router', 'App\Your\Router');
so I community forces to use second approach.
for more details, have a look here.
Extending Router(laravel.io forum)
Extending default Laravel 5 Router
How to extend Router or Replace Customer Router class on Laravel5?
hope someone will find this useful
Thanks.
I have this really weird problem with laravels routing.
I started to make some routes and controllers and just returning strings from each controller confirm that it worked.
And everything did work.
Now when i started making the master view and putting it together with some templates for the routes I noticed that the string that laravel returns isn't the string i wrote.
All routes return "This is routename page"
The only routes that actually work as expected is the routes with wild cards, and the route going to the start page.
Those routes return the correct strings.
Example routing
Route::get('/users', 'UserController#index');
class UserController extends BaseController {
public function index() {
return 'List of users!';
}
});
This routing displays "This is user page" (NO ERROR)
I have tried returning the string directly from the route, clearing all the cache files i could find including route cache, restarting browser and MAMP
Just to be clear, the routing returned the correct strings when I made the route.
I have installed Elixir to compile my scss files, but i doubt that should have anything to do with my problem.. :(
Figured it out just after I posted the question!
I had a route with a wildcard directly after the root
Route::get('/{'user'});
This route were overriding all other routes that only had one parameter after the root. So if I go to the url "/users" the route will assume it is a wildcard and send it to another controller that returns the string "This is {wildcard} page!", Brainfreez! :P
I've got laravel set up on a domain on a linux host and I have a WAMP local host set up.
The only route that works is the root, when ever I try go to another route such as domain.com/account I get a "Controller method not found." error.
In my routes.php file I have:
Route::controller('','LoginController');
Route::controller('account', 'AccountController');
In my LoginController, I have just two methods. getIndex and postIndex.
After a couple of hours Googling with no results and playing around with the routes file amongst things, still nothing worked.
I tried adding the below route which didn't work either.
Route::any('hello', function(){
return 'hello!';
});
However, I then commented out my Route::controller('','LoginController'); line and the other routes started working!
I then changed it to Route::controller('login','LoginController'); and this and the other routes still worked. I then changed it to Route::any('','LoginController#getIndex'); and the root and other routes still worked. However, doing it this way, when I cliked the login button on my page nothing happened.
So my question really is, is there something wrong with doing Route::controller('','LoginController');? As everything else seems to 'work'
Laravel save an internal collection of registered routes in the $routes member of the Router class. When dispatching a request, a process of picking each element from this collection and test with current request will be executed to find out which route will be handle. This process is affected by the order of your route registering statements.
When testing each route with the current request, the picked route will be compiled and have a regex pattern. This pattern will be use to check with the current URI by the preg_match function as you can see at this line in Laravel source.
When using Route::controller a special route will be add to your routes collection. If your input is Route::controller($uri, $controller) then this special routes will have a regex pattern as ^/$uri/?P<_missing>(.*)$ and it tells Laravel that this request belong to a missing method of the $controller controller class.
In your case, you have set the value of $uri to an empty string which cause the regex of the special route to be ^/?P<_missing>(.*)$ (setting $uri with the string / cause the same effect). Well, this regex will match every URI. So, the internal route looking up process will abort when look to this special route. This is the reason while the exception has been thrown.
You should not use an empty string or the/ string when register with the Route::controller method like the way you did. Instead, use Route::resource or explicit calls (Route::get, Route::post, ...) to handle your top level routes.
I have not tried that, but maybe you could add a "/":
Route::controller('/','LoginController');
Edit
I was able to reproduce the issue and I solved by changing the order of your route lines:
Route::controller('accounts', 'AccountController');
Route::controller('','LoginController');