Background: I am trying to set up single sign on (SSO) for users such that they can authenticate to my website and not have to authenticate a second time to our third-party MSP's website. Ideally, the user clicks a link on our website and is taken to the third-party site already logged in and landing on the dashboard (if the account doesn't exist, it is created during this step). We are not using SAML for authentication as a security feature, so all that we need the SAML code for is just producing cookies that prevent the user from having to log in again when he/she gets to our vendor's site. This third party MSP does not support authentication via API or web service and therefore I have been tasked with implementing SAML, their only supported SSO method. I am new to SAML (but not PHP or development) and have been learning as I go. I am told it will support the goals described above.
I initially tried using LDAP as the authentication source as this is what I use for authentication to my website, but this resulted in me getting directed to a login page with no discernible way to instead just pass parameters to SimpleSAMLphp to tell it "the user is already authenticated, all I need you to do is give me valid cookies so I can get past the third party website's authentication checks".
So I switched to writing a custom authentication module. I opened up the GitHub for SimpleSAMLphp and used the "UserPassBase" class as an example to create my own authentication module that inherits from the "Source" class. Because I don't need to re-authenticate the user against LDAP a second time since they're already logged in to our website, I created a simple "authenticate" function that just sets the $state['Attributes'] array.
Here is the code for my custom module:
<?php
namespace SimpleSAML\Module\productauth\Auth\Source;
use SimpleSAML\Auth;
/**
Author: Joey
Class developed to be used as a custom authentication module for simpleSAMLphp. This class will take an existing session from a product website and use it to create a SAML session and redirect to a website.
**/
class ProductAuth extends \SimpleSAML\Auth\Source {
const STAGEID = '\SimpleSAML\Module\productauth\Auth\ProductAuth.state';
const AUTHID = '\SimpleSAML\Module\productauth\Auth\ProductAuth.AuthId';
private $user;
public function __construct($info, $config) { // parameters aren't used, just filler from base class
$info = array("AuthId" => "productauth");
parent::__construct($info, $config);
}
public function login($user, $redirectURL) {
$this->user = $user; // normally I'd set this in the constructor, but the overload has my hands tied as far as function definitions go
$this->initLogin($redirectURL); // calls authenticate function and then, if no exceptions, parent::loginCompleted which redirects to the given URL
}
public function authenticate(&$state) { // called by parent::initLogin
$state[self::AUTHID] = $this->authId;
$state['Attributes'] = [
'uid' => [$this->user->uid],
'givenName' => [$this->user->givenName],
'sn' => [$this->user->sn],
'mail' => [$this->user->mail]
];
$id = Auth\State::saveState($state, self::STAGEID);
}
}
?>
I am calling it from a controller class on my website:
private function goToTrainingSite() {
require_once("../third-party-libs/simplesamlphp/_include.php");
global $TRAINING_URL;
$user = $_SESSION['subject']->user;
$samlObj = new SimpleSAML\Module\productauth\Auth\Source\ProductAuth(array(), array());
$samlObj->login($user, $TRAINING_URL);
}
I mimicked the flow of the "UserPassBase" class (https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/blob/master/modules/core/lib/Auth/UserPassBase.php), but it seems that despite all of my authentication working and setting a SimpleSAMLAuth cookie, when the parent::loginCompleted function in the "Source" class (https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/blob/master/lib/SimpleSAML/Auth/Source.php) runs, it redirected me to the third party site. I then see the following in the logs:
SAML2.0 - IdP.SSOService: incoming authentication request: [REDACTED DATA]
Session: 'productauth' not valid because we are not authenticated.
I have been trying for 3 days to figure out why it seems as though despite setting SimpleSAML session cookies with a completed, successful authentication, that upon receiving the auth request from the SP, my SimpleSAMLphp code just pretends to not know about the completed auth and tries to authenticate again... but because it is not being called from my code, it doesn't have access to the $user variable which contains all of the attributes I need to place on the user when he/she authenticates to this third party website. It seems that when it receives an authentication request, my SimpleSAMLphp installation starts a new session and tries a brand new authentication.
I have delved into a lot of the code of SimpleSAMLphp and tried to understand what is going on, but it seems that there is just no reasonable way to authenticate by calling an authentication source from PHP code and being able to skip the SP-initiated authentication. I have tried:
Using the SimpleSAML API (https://simplesamlphp.org/docs/stable/simplesamlphp-sp-api) to call my authentication source, but there seems to be no way to pass that $user variable I need the attributes from.
Trying to load the cookies in the "Session" class when it is checking for valid sessions... but it seems like the cookies from the successful auth session initiated by my code are just gone and nowhere to be found.
I decided to stop focusing on trying to get the $user variable and the data I needed to the second authentication, and instead focus on WHY the second authentication was even happening. I looked at the cookies and thought about how the data was being retrieved, and made a correct hunch that our application's custom session handler might be at fault for SimpleSAMLphp's inability to recognize the first authentication. Our custom session handler stores our sessions in the database, but SimpleSAMLphp expects to use the default PHP session handler to manage its session. Therefore, my first authentication was being sent to the database and when SimpleSAMLphp started looking for it where PHP sessions are usually stored, it didn't see it and assumed it needed to kick off another authentication session from scratch.
Using SimpleSAMLphp's documentation for service providers and a lot of my own debugging, I changed the function in my controller like so:
private function goToTrainingSite() {
require_once ("../third-party-libs/simplesamlphp/_include.php");
global $TRAINING_URL;
$joeySiteSession = $_SESSION;
$user = $_SESSION ['subject']->user; // save user to variable before the Joey's Site session is closed
session_write_close (); // close Joey's Site session to allow SimpleSAMLphp session to open
session_set_save_handler ( new SessionHandler (), true ); // stop using SessionHandlerJoey and use default PHP handler for SimpleSAMLphp
$samlObj = new SimpleSAML\Module\joeysiteauth\Auth\Source\JoeySiteAuth ( array (), array () );
$samlObj->login ( $user, function () { return;} ); // use custom authentication module to set atttributes and everything SimpleSAMLphp needs in the auth session/cookie
$session = \SimpleSAML\Session::getSessionFromRequest ();
$session->cleanup (); // must call this function when we are done with SimpleSAMLphp session and intend to use our Joey's Site session again
session_write_close ();
$_SESSION = $joeySiteSession; // restore Joey's Site session
header ( "Location: {$TRAINING_URL}" );
}
Related
I'm trying to create my own authentication module on SimpleSAMLphp using this class :
https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/blob/v1.18.8/modules/exampleauth/lib/Auth/Source/External.php
The goal is to create an IdP initiated login so the users only have to click on a link to go to the SP.
I followed all the instructions but i can't use my own session in this class in the getUser function.
After debugging i figured my session gets overwritten by SimpleSAMLphp session.
If i break the code on the getUser function ( i called a function on a null object by accident ), my session isn't erased, which i think is weird. Maybe it resets my session on failure ?
I tried
$session = \SimpleSAML\Session::getSessionFromRequest();
$session->cleanup();
and
$session = \SimpleSAML\Session::getSession();
$session->cleanup();
How can i use my own session in this situation ?
Thank you
I'm using the same SimpleSAMLphp installation for both IdP and SP ( 2 different workflows ), is this problematic ? Should i install it twice if i need both SP & IdP ?
I'm using simpleSAMLphp v1.18.8 with php5.6.
Thank you.
I'm building an Electron app that connects to a Laravel 8 App (with Jetstream using Inertia) and the API.
I'm porting over the existing Inertia Jetstream Vue components to replicate the same functionality that appears in the actual web app.
When using the password confirm functionality Laravel uses session storage to store the time the password was confirmed, and then later again to check the status of the confirmed password.
When using token authentication, there is no session.
I can create new controllers to handle this no problem, but how can I substitute the calls to $request->session()?
The code to store the password confirmation looks like this:
public function store(Request $request)
{
$confirmed = app(ConfirmPassword::class)(
$this->guard, $request->user(), $request->input('password')
);
if ($confirmed) {
// here is the problem ... no session with tokens
$request->session()->put('auth.password_confirmed_at', time());
}
return $confirmed
? app(PasswordConfirmedResponse::class)
: app(FailedPasswordConfirmationResponse::class);
}
What's the best way to store this so it can be retrieved on subsequent calls?
I am not totally certain because it is used on mobile, which I have no experience with. However in browser land what you could do is to use cookies and set the token to httpOnly. I have a small example in nodeJs from one of my hobby projects:
const token = jwt.sign({ _id: currentUser._id }, process.env.JWT_SECRET, { expiresIn: '7d' });
currentUser.password = undefined;
res.cookie('token', token, {
httpOnly: true,
});
By setting the cookie to HttpOnly a user cannot fiddle with it. since it's mobile if it supports cookies this is even less a vulnarability issue.
Rodney
I'm using Hybridauth 3 in my PHP app to make some periodical tweets on behalf of my account.
The app has all possible permissions. I'm giving it all permissions when it asks for them on the first auth step.
After that Twitter redirects me to the specified callback URL and there I'm getting a pair of access_token and access_token_secret.
But when I'm trying to make a tweet using these tokens - it gives me:
{"errors":[{"code":220,"message":"Your credentials do not allow access to this resource."}]}
Here's how I'm trying to make a tweet:
$config = [
'authentication_parameters' => [
//Location where to redirect users once they authenticate
'callback' => 'https://mysite/twittercallback/',
//Twitter application credentials
'keys' => [
'key' => 'xxx',
'secret' => 'yyy'
],
'authorize' => true
]
];
$adapter = new Hybridauth\Provider\Twitter($config['authentication_parameters']);
//Attempt to authenticate the user
$adapter->setAccessToken(/*tokens I've got from getAccessToken() on /twittercallback/*/);
if(! $adapter->isConnected()) {
// never goes here, so adapter is connected
return null;
}
try{
$response = $adapter->setUserStatus('Hello world!');
}
catch (\Exception $e) {
// here I've got the error
echo $e->getMessage();
return;
}
Tried to recreate tokens and key\secret pairs and passed auth process for the app many times, including entering password for my Twitter account (as suggested in some posts on stackoverflow) but still have this error.
P.S. According to this, Hybridauth has fixed the issue in the recent release.
It looks like you are using application authentication as opposed to user authentication. In order to post a tweet, you must authenticate as a user. Also, make sure your Twitter app has read/write privileges.
After comparing headers of outgoing requests from my server with the ones required by Twitter, I've noticed that Hybris doesn't add very important part of the header: oauth_token. At least it's not doing this in the code for Twitter adapter and for the scenario when you apply access token with setAccessToken(). It's just storing tokens in the inner storage but not initializing corresponding class member called consumerToken in OAuth1 class.
So to initialize the consumer token properly I've overridden the apiRequest method for Twitter class (before it used the defalut parent implementation) and added a small condition, so when consumer token is empty before the request - we need to try to init it.
public function apiRequest($url, $method = 'GET', $parameters = [], $headers = [])
{
if(empty($this->consumerToken)) {
$this->initialize();
}
return parent::apiRequest($url, $method, $parameters, $headers);
}
I'm not sure that I've fixed it the best way, but as long as it's working - that's fine.
For your info setAccessToken was fixed in v3.0.0-beta.2 (see PR https://github.com/hybridauth/hybridauth/pull/880)
I faced the same error when implementing a sample app in clojure and the following resource was a huge help to sort out my confusion about application-only auth vs user authentication: https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/basics/authentication/overview/oauth
I'm trying to implement a SessionProvider auth plugin for a mediawiki install.
I'm trying to integrate with an existing auth system that uses $_SESSION to indicate that a user is logged in, however any method I try, the resulting $_SESSION variable that I get inside the class' provideSessionInfo function is empty.
Previously this was done with a onUserLoadFromSession hook (that contained the bulk of the logic code below), but the update appears to have broken actually looking at the existing $_SESSION:
public function provideSessionInfo(WebRequest $request)
{
// $_SESSION is hidden away per-request, but $request->getSession likes to call this function (yay infinite loops)
if (!isset($_SESSION['memberid'])) {
return null;
}
$memberid = $_SESSION['memberid'];
$mr_user = MyRadio_User::getInstance($memberid);
$user = User::newFromName($memberid);
$dbr = wfGetDB(DB_REPLICA);
$s = $dbr->selectRow('user', ['user_id'], ['user_name' => $memberid]);
if ($s === false) {
return null;
} else {
$user->mName = $memberid;
$user->mId = $user->idForName();
$user->loadFromDatabase();
$user->saveSettings();
}
if ($mr_user->hasAuth(AUTH_WIKIADMIN) && !in_array('sysop', $user->getGroups())) {
$user->addGroup('sysop');
}
$user->mTouched = wfTimestampnow();
return new SessionInfo(SessionInfo::MAX_PRIORITY, [
'provider' => $this,
'persisted' => true,
'userInfo' => UserInfo::newFromUser($user, true),
]);
}
If I hardcode $memberid, the function and the session provider works fine, but I just can't seem to find a way to transfer the session from one PHP "application" to another.
Adding debugging shows the PHPSESSID variable still set in the cookie, but for whatever reason it can't be pulled out into an actual session object. I've tried various session_start() style methods to no effect.
I feel like I'm missing something obvious, but the documentation for this stuff is just a basic wiki page and the raw generated doxygen.
Session handling is not a good way of cross-application communication. MediaWiki uses its own session handling, which means there is no connection between $_SESSION in MediaWiki and $_SESSION in your application at all. The first will be populated from MediaWiki's object cache (as configured by $wgSessionCacheType), the other from PHP session files or whatever.
If you really do not have a better way to pass data, you'll have to write a custom access class which can be called by your provider, which will save the current session handler, install a null session handler (which restores PHP's native session handling which will hopefully be interoperable with the other application), start the session, fetch the session data, restore the original session handler, and probably start the session again.
I'm using Cakephp's build in test framework to test my controllers. I have a logout function that expires a variety of cookies that are created as the user uses the site. I am trying to read said cookies to determine if a test should pass or not, i.e. to test if the cookie is correctly expired. I have made sure that the cookie component is correctly instantiated, but I cannot read any value back from the cookie that should be there. This is the code that composes the test I am running:
public function testLogout() {
// setup the cookie component
$collection = new ComponentCollection();
$this->Cookie = new CookieComponent($collection);
$result = $this->testAction('/users/logout');
$cookie_name = Configure::read('tech_cookie_name');
$cookie_data = $this->Cookie->read($cookie_name);
debug($cookie_name);
// cookie data is returning as NULL but I'm expecting some type of value.
debug($cookie_data);
debug($result);
exit;
}
I realize that exit is killing the test early, but I'm using it to see if anything is send back from the cookie. I'm not sure why I cannot read any data from a cookie that I know is there. Does anyone know why that might be, or have a solution for how to properly read from cookies in a unit test.
You cann't read from routes.php Configure::read() in certain cases and it is not a good practice. it will work in localhost but not in live. try to configure your session properly.
by calling your session from AppController and also from your current Controller (UserController) then you should be able to see it in your testing actions.
public $components = array('Session', 'RequestHandler', 'Cookie', ...);
if you write your session like this:
$this->Session->write('Test.tech_cookie_name', 'tech_cookie_name');
then you should be able to read it like this:
$this->Session->read('Test.tech_cookie_name');