Suppose we have one dataBase that have one table called fathers; and another table called children.
I want get all children whose father is mamali.
$pls = children::where(['father_id' => 5, 'isGoodBoy' => true])->take(4)->get();
And i want change $pls and set father_id to 7,8,50,55. so can do this one by one request in foreach :
for ($i = 0; $i < count($pls); $i++) {
$pls[$i] = $arayWhoWantBaby[$i];
$pls[$i]->save();
}
This work but do with many request...(in this example 1 request for get and 4 request for update ! )
I want do this with one or two DB request,one to get data from DB and another set new data with one request to do all work and update items $pls[0][1][2]...
one thing as "in" keyword in sql for update ;
This is what I meant. Honestly, I'd just stick with the extra 4 queries. Small updates like that shouldn't be an issue.
Also, doing it like this will not trigger any Eloquent events.
$father_ids = [7, 8, 50, 55];
$children_ids = children::where(['father_id' => 5, 'isGoodBoy' => true])->take(4)->pluck('id')->all();
$sql = <<<SQL
UPDATE
children
SET
father_id = CASE id
WHEN :children_id_1 THEN :father_id_1
WHEN :children_id_2 THEN :father_id_2
WHEN :children_id_3 THEN :father_id_3
WHEN :children_id_4 THEN :father_id_4
END
WHERE
id IN (:children_id_1, :children_id_2, :children_id_3, :children_id_4)
SQL;
$bindings = [
'children_id_1' => $children_ids[0],
'children_id_2' => $children_ids[1],
'children_id_3' => $children_ids[2],
'children_id_4' => $children_ids[3],
'father_id_1' => $father_ids[0],
'father_id_2' => $father_ids[1],
'father_id_3' => $father_ids[2],
'father_id_4' => $father_ids[3],
];
DB::update($sql, $bindings);
Related
I list of tasks. Everyone task has Id in DB. Id column has setted up autoincrement.
I made this list sortable via jquery by sortable() function from jquery ui.
Now if I change order of times I change order of Id in DB. But bcz of UPDATE does not work when values of Id are same - I need to change ordering one time from 200 and second time from 0. Is it good solution? Ans is it okay to change Id or shoula I create another column for this purpose?
Thanks
$i = 0;
// load all data from db in ascending order bcz of find first id value
$first_index = $database -> select (
'items', // table
'id', // column
[ 'ORDER' => ['id' => 'ASC' ] ]// ordering
);
// if first id value is equal to 0 then set up i as 1000 bcz if there are same values UPDATE table below will not work
if ( $first_index[0] == 0 ) {
$i = 200;
} else if ( $first_index[0] == 200 ) {
$i = 0;
};
// convert array (item[]=1&item[]=2) to separate items
foreach ($_POST['item'] as $value) {
// Execute statement:
$affected = $database -> update ('items',
[ 'id' => $i ], // SET (set id as $i which is increasing for each value)
[ 'id' => $value ] // WHERE
);
$i++;
}
I have a Job model and a Visit model, a Job can have many Visit's. I have set up the relationships appropriately in my Models.
A Visit also belongs to a Supplier, so a Supplier can have many visits.
A subcontractor is a Supplier who has an engineer value of 0 in the database.
I want to return an associative array with the amount of Jobs raised per subcontractor, something like this:
$supplier_job_count = array(
'Subcontractor1' => 23,
'Subcontractor2' => 3,
'Subcontractor3' => 7,
'Subcontractor4'=> 0
);
Here is what I have:
$conditions = array();
// get all the visits in the database
$visits = $this->Job->Visit->find('all');
// extract all the visit id's
$visit_supplier_ids = Hash::extract($visits, '{n}.Visit.supplier_id'); // 11612 records
// get all the subcontractors in the database
$subcontractors = $this->Job->Visit->Supplier->find('all', array('order' => 'id ASC', 'conditions' => array('Supplier.engineer' => 0)));
// extract all the subcontractor id's
$subcontractor_ids = Hash::extract($subcontractors, '{n}.Supplier.id'); // 1288 records
// intersect arrays so we only want matching values from both, i.e. only want visits whose supplier is a subcontractor
$visit_subcontractors = array_values(array_intersect($visit_supplier_ids, $subcontractor_ids));
// find all visits who is a subcontractor id
$visits = $this->Job->Visit->find('all', array('conditions' => array('Visit.supplier_id' => $visit_subcontractors)));
// extract out the job id's for the subcontractor visits
$visit_jobs_ids = Hash::extract($visits, '{n}.Visit.job_id');
// pass the job id's to the conditions for the jobs
$conditions['Job.id'] = $visit_jobs_ids;
// get all subcontractor jobs
$subcontractor_jobs = $this->Job->find('all', array('conditions' => $conditions));
$subcontractor_job_count = array();
foreach ($subcontractors as $key => $value) {
// this is where I am getting stuck
$subcontractor_job_count[$value['Supplier.name']] = ));
}
I am sort of half way there, just struggling to get a count of how many jobs raised per subcontractor, any ideas?
I'm Trying to solve this error i'm having with PHP, i'm not completely familiar with the Language, so it would be nice if you would help me out, I can't figure out this error.
I have this Code Here:
public function index() {
$counterino = ClientsJobs::all()->count();
$MasterArray = array();
/* Go Through All of the Records in the Client-Jobs Table and Resolve their columns to Desired Names */
for ($i = 1; $i <= $counterino; $i++ ) {
//Temporary Array for one Name-Resolved-Row of the Table.
$tempArray = array(
'id' => ClientsJobs::find( $i )->id, // id
'client_name' => ClientsJobs::find( $i )->clients->fname , // get the first name ( based on fk )
'job_name' => ClientsJobs::find( $i )->jobs->name, // get the name of the job ( based on fk )
'wage' => ClientsJobs::find( $i )->wage, // wage for the job
'productivity'=> ClientsJobs::find( $i )->producivity // productivity level for the job
);
$MasterArray[] = $tempArray; //add the row
}
return $MasterArray;
}
This code changes the names of the of the Columns in the ClientsJobs Junction Table.
public function up()
{
Schema::create('clients-jobs', function(Blueprint $table)
{
$table->increments('id')->unsigned();
$table->integer('client_id')->unsigned();
$table->foreign('client_id')->references('id')->on('clients');
$table->integer('job_id')->unsigned();
$table->foreign('job_id')->references('id')->on('jobs');
$table->decimal('wage', 4, 2);
$table->decimal('productivity', 5, 2); // 0.00 - 100.00 (PERCENT)
$table->timestamps();
});
}
The Jobs and Clients Table are very simple.
I am having the Error in the index() function I posted above, it says
'Trying to get property of non-object'
Starting on the Line
'client_name' => ClientsJobs::find( $i )->clients->fname,
It's also mad at me for the other parts of setting the array.
I have tested the individual functions I am using to set the array and they all work, fname should also return a string, I used dd() to get the value.
I have tried:
-Using FindorFail
-Setting the Array without the for loop and setting each element manually
-Dumping out multiple parts of the function to make sure it works( counterino, all of the functions for the array, .. )
My guess is that it has to do with the type-deduction of PHP, I actually only need a string array, but would still like to use the name mappings because I am going to be passing this a View I am using for some of my other stuff. The Code was actually working earlier, but I broke it somehow (adding a new record or running a composer update?) anyway, there's some serious voodoo going on.
Thanks in Advance for the help, I am working on this project for a Non-Profit Organization for free.
P.S. I am using Laravel 4.2, and Platform 2.0
First off, this is a horrible practice:
$tempArray = array(
'id' => ClientsJobs::find( $i )->id, // id
'client_name' => ClientsJobs::find( $i )->clients->fname , // get the first name ( based on fk )
'job_name' => ClientsJobs::find( $i )->jobs->name, // get the name of the job ( based on fk )
'wage' => ClientsJobs::find( $i )->wage, // wage for the job
'productivity'=> ClientsJobs::find( $i )->producivity // productivity level for the job
);
By calling ClientJobs::find($i) multiple times, you are doing multiple times the same lookup - either to your DB, or to your cache layer if you have one configured.
Secondly, the answer to your question depends on your ClientJobs model. For your example to work, it needs:
A valid clients relations, defined as follows:
public function clients()
{
return $this->hasOne(...);
}
clients also needs to be a valid 1:1 always existing relation. i.e. there must always be one client. If there isn't, you are susceptible to the error you just got (as the `clients̀ magic would end up being null)
The same applies to jobs.
In every case, it is better to make sure everything is set first. Check using the following:
$clientJob = ClientJobs::find($i);
if (!$clientJob->clients || $clientJob->jobs) throw new \RangeException("No client or job defined for ClientJob $i");
And then catch the exception at whichever level you prefer.
Best approach
public function index() {
$masterArray = array();
ClientsJobs::with('clients', 'jobs')->chunk(200, function($records) use (&$masterArray) {
foreach ($records as $record) {
$masterArray[] = array(
'id' => $record->id, // id
'client_name' => !empty($record->clients) ? $record->clients->fname : null,
'job_name' => !empty($record->jobs) ? $record->jobs->name : null,
'wage' => $record->wage,
'productivity'=> $record->productivity,
);
}
});
return $MasterArray;
}
Your Approach is very wrong
If you want to return an array you can do like this
$counterino = ClientsJobs::all()->toArray();
This will fetch all rows from the table and the toArray will convert the object into an array
I have the following code in CakePHP 2:
$this->Order->id = 5;
$this->Order->saveAll(array(
'Order' => array(
'person_id' => $this->Session->read('Person.id'),
'amount' => $total,
'currency_id' => $code
),
'Lineitem' => $lineitems /* a correctly-formatted array */
));
I would expect this to update the row with the Primary Key of 5 in the Order table and then insert the Lineitem rows with an order_id of 5.
However, all it does is create a new row in Order and then use the new id from the new Order record to create the Listitem rows.
Note: I'm only setting the ID as above for debugging purposes and to easily demonstrate this question. In my final code, I'll be checking to see if there's already a pending order with the current person_id and doing $this->Order->id = $var; if there is and $this->Order->create(); if there isn't.
In other words, sometimes I will want it to INSERT (in which case I will issue $this->Order->create(); ) and sometimes I will want it to UPDATE (in which case I will issue $this->Order->id = $var; ). The test case above should produce an UPDATE but it's producing an INSERT instead.
Any idea what I am doing wrong here?
The array you pass to Model->saveAll() doesnt't contain the order's id, so Cake creates a new one. If you wanto to update an existing record, either you set the order id in the passed array, or you retrieve it with a find. The documentation explicitly remarks
If you want to update a value, rather than create a new one, make sure
your are passing the primary key field into the data array
$order = $this->Order->findById(5);
// ... modify $order if needed
$this->Order->saveAll(array('Order' => $order, 'LineItem' => $items));
In your case, you may want to use something like the following to be as concise as possible. Model::saveAssociated() is smart enough to create or update depending on the id, but you must provide suitable input. Model::read($fields, $id) initializes the internal $data: for an existing record all fields will be read from the database, but for a nonexistent id, you'll need to supply the correct data for it to succeed. Assuming an order belongsTo a customer, I supply the customer id if the order doesn't exist
// set the internal Model::$data['Order']
$this->Order->read(null, 5);
// You may want to supply needed information to create
// a new order if it doesn't exist, like the customer
if (! $this->Order->exists()) {
$this->Order->set(array("Customer" => array("id" => $customer_id)));
}
$this->Order->set(array('LineItem' => $items));
$this->Order->saveAssociated();
As a final note, it seems you are implementing a shopping cart. If that's the case, maybe it'd be clearer to use a separate ShoppingCart instead of an Order with a finalized flag.
Have you tried following:
$this->Order->saveAll(array(
'Order' => array(
'id' => 5,
'person_id' => $this->Session->read('Person.id'),
'amount' => $total,
'currency_id' => $code
),
'Lineitem' => $lineitems /* a correctly-formatted array */
));
Its pretty much the same what you did with :
$this->Order->id = 5;
Maybe that would fix your problem.
Cake is checking if you set id field and if its there it updates record, if not found it creates new record instead.
update:
Then maybe check before you saveAll if there is id field, then save result of check to some boolean and create array to save determined by this boolean for example:
if($id_exist) $order['Order']['id'] = 5;
$order['Order']['id'] = 5;
$order['Order']['person_id'] = $this->Session->read('Person.id'),
$order['Order']['amount'] = $total;
$order['Order']['currency_id'] = $code;
$this->Order->saveAll(array(
'Order' => $order,
'Lineitem' => $lineitems /* a correctly-formatted array */
));
I came across an article about Join decomposition.
SCENARIO #1 (Not good):
Select * from tag
Join tag_post ON tag_post.tag_id=tag.id
Join post ON tag_post.post_id=post.id
Where tag.tag='mysql'
SCENARIO #2 (good):
Select * from tag where tag='mysql'
Select * from tag_post Where tag_id=1234
Select * from post where post.id in (123,456,9098,545)
It was suggested to stick to scenario #2 for many reasons specially caching.
The question is how to join inside our application. Could u give us an example with PHP
after retrieving them individually?
(I have read MyISAM Performance: Join Decomposition?
but it did not help)
You COULD use an SQL subselect (if I understand your question). Using PHP would be rather odd while SQL has all the capabilities.
SELECT *
FROM `post`
WHERE `id` IN (
SELECT `post_id`
FROM `tag_post`
WHERE `tag_id` = (
SELECT `tag_id`
FROM `tag`
WHERE `tag` = 'mysql'
)
)
I'm not sure how your database structure looks like, but this should get you started. It's pretty much SQL inception. A query within a query. You can select data using the result of a subselect.
Please, before copying this SQL and telling me it's not working, verify all table and column names.
Before anyone starts to cry about speed, caching and efficiency: I think this is rather efficient. Instead of selecting ALL data and loop through it using PHP you can just select smaller bits using native SQL as it was ment to be used.
Again, I highly discourage to use PHP to get specific data. SQL is all you need.
edit: here's your script
Assuming you have some multi-dimensional arrays containing all data:
// dummy results
// table tag
$tags = array(
// first record
array(
'id' => 0,
'tag' => 'mysql'
),
// second record
array(
'id' => 1,
'tag' => 'php'
)
// etc
);
// table tag_post
$tag_posts = array(
// first record
array(
'id' => 0,
'post_id' => 0, // post #1
'tag_id' => 0 // has tag mysql
),
// second record
array(
'id' => 1,
'post_id' => 1, // post #2
'tag_id' => 0 // has tag mysql
),
// second record
array(
'id' => 2,
'post_id' => 2, // post #3
'tag_id' => 1 // has tag mysql
)
// etc
);
// table post
$posts = array(
// first record
array(
'id' => 0,
'content' => 'content post #1'
),
// second record
array(
'id' => 1,
'content' => 'content post #2'
),
// third record
array(
'id' => 2,
'content' => 'content post #3'
)
// etc
);
// searching for tag
$tag = 'mysql';
$tagid = -1;
$postids = array();
$results = array();
// first get the id of this tag
foreach($tags as $key => $value) {
if($value['tag'] === $tag) {
// set the id of the tag
$tagid = $value['id'];
// theres only one possible id, so we break the loop
break;
}
}
// get post ids using the tag id
if($tagid > -1) { // verify if a tag id was found
foreach($tag_posts as $key => $value) {
if($value['tag_id'] === $tagid) {
// add post id to post ids
$postids[] = $value['post_id'];
}
}
}
// finally get post content
if(count($postids) > 0) { //verify if some posts were found
foreach($posts as $key => $value) {
// check if the id of the post can be found in the posts ids we have found
if(in_array($value['id'], $postids)) {
// add all data of the post to result
$results[] = $value;
}
}
}
If you look at the length of the script above, this is exactly why I'd stick to SQL.
Now, as I recall, you wanted to join using PHP, rather doing it in SQL. This is not a join but getting results using some arrays. I know, but a join would only be a waste of time and less efficient than just leaving all results as they are.
edit: 21-12-12 as result of comments below
I've done a little benchmark and the results are quite stunning:
DATABASE RECORDS:
tags: 10
posts: 1000
tag_posts: 1000 (every post has 1 random tag)
Selecting all posts with a specific tag resulted in 82 records.
SUBSELECT RESULTS:
run time: 0.772885084152
bytes downloaded from database: 3417
PHP RESULTS:
run time: 0.086599111557
bytes downloaded from database: 48644
Please note that the benchmark had both the application as the database on the
same host. If you use different hosts for the application and the database layer,
the PHP result could end up taking longer because naturally sending data between
two hosts will take much more time then when they're on the same host.
Even though the subselect returns much less data, the duration of the requests is nearly 10 times longer...
I've NEVER expected these results, so I'm convinced and I will certainly use this information when I know that performance is important however I will still use SQL for smaller operations hehe...