What is the most efficient way to check if an array is a flat array
of primitive values or if it is a multidimensional array?
Is there any way to do this without actually looping through an
array and running is_array() on each of its elements?
Use count() twice; one time in default mode and one time in recursive mode. If the values match, the array is not multidimensional, as a multidimensional array would have a higher recursive count.
if (count($array) == count($array, COUNT_RECURSIVE))
{
echo 'array is not multidimensional';
}
else
{
echo 'array is multidimensional';
}
This option second value mode was added in PHP 4.2.0. From the PHP Docs:
If the optional mode parameter is set to COUNT_RECURSIVE (or 1), count() will recursively count the array. This is particularly useful for counting all the elements of a multidimensional array. count() does not detect infinite recursion.
However this method does not detect array(array()).
The short answer is no you can't do it without at least looping implicitly if the 'second dimension' could be anywhere. If it has to be in the first item, you'd just do
is_array($arr[0]);
But, the most efficient general way I could find is to use a foreach loop on the array, shortcircuiting whenever a hit is found (at least the implicit loop is better than the straight for()):
$ more multi.php
<?php
$a = array(1 => 'a',2 => 'b',3 => array(1,2,3));
$b = array(1 => 'a',2 => 'b');
$c = array(1 => 'a',2 => 'b','foo' => array(1,array(2)));
function is_multi($a) {
$rv = array_filter($a,'is_array');
if(count($rv)>0) return true;
return false;
}
function is_multi2($a) {
foreach ($a as $v) {
if (is_array($v)) return true;
}
return false;
}
function is_multi3($a) {
$c = count($a);
for ($i=0;$i<$c;$i++) {
if (is_array($a[$i])) return true;
}
return false;
}
$iters = 500000;
$time = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < $iters; $i++) {
is_multi($a);
is_multi($b);
is_multi($c);
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo "is_multi took ".($end-$time)." seconds in $iters times\n";
$time = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < $iters; $i++) {
is_multi2($a);
is_multi2($b);
is_multi2($c);
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo "is_multi2 took ".($end-$time)." seconds in $iters times\n";
$time = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < $iters; $i++) {
is_multi3($a);
is_multi3($b);
is_multi3($c);
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo "is_multi3 took ".($end-$time)." seconds in $iters times\n";
?>
$ php multi.php
is_multi took 7.53565130424 seconds in 500000 times
is_multi2 took 4.56964588165 seconds in 500000 times
is_multi3 took 9.01706600189 seconds in 500000 times
Implicit looping, but we can't shortcircuit as soon as a match is found...
$ more multi.php
<?php
$a = array(1 => 'a',2 => 'b',3 => array(1,2,3));
$b = array(1 => 'a',2 => 'b');
function is_multi($a) {
$rv = array_filter($a,'is_array');
if(count($rv)>0) return true;
return false;
}
var_dump(is_multi($a));
var_dump(is_multi($b));
?>
$ php multi.php
bool(true)
bool(false)
For PHP 4.2.0 or newer:
function is_multi($array) {
return (count($array) != count($array, 1));
}
I think this is the most straight forward way and it's state-of-the-art:
function is_multidimensional(array $array) {
return count($array) !== count($array, COUNT_RECURSIVE);
}
After PHP 7 you could simply do:
public function is_multi(array $array):bool
{
return is_array($array[array_key_first($array)]);
}
You could look check is_array() on the first element, under the assumption that if the first element of an array is an array, then the rest of them are too.
I think you will find that this function is the simplest, most efficient, and fastest way.
function isMultiArray($a){
foreach($a as $v) if(is_array($v)) return TRUE;
return FALSE;
}
You can test it like this:
$a = array(1 => 'a',2 => 'b',3 => array(1,2,3));
$b = array(1 => 'a',2 => 'b');
echo isMultiArray($a) ? 'is multi':'is not multi';
echo '<br />';
echo isMultiArray($b) ? 'is multi':'is not multi';
Don't use COUNT_RECURSIVE
click this site for know why
use rsort and then use isset
function is_multi_array( $arr ) {
rsort( $arr );
return isset( $arr[0] ) && is_array( $arr[0] );
}
//Usage
var_dump( is_multi_array( $some_array ) );
Even this works
is_array(current($array));
If false its a single dimension array if true its a multi dimension array.
current will give you the first element of your array and check if the first element is an array or not by is_array function.
You can also do a simple check like this:
$array = array('yo'=>'dream', 'mydear'=> array('anotherYo'=>'dream'));
$array1 = array('yo'=>'dream', 'mydear'=> 'not_array');
function is_multi_dimensional($array){
$flag = 0;
while(list($k,$value)=each($array)){
if(is_array($value))
$flag = 1;
}
return $flag;
}
echo is_multi_dimensional($array); // returns 1
echo is_multi_dimensional($array1); // returns 0
I think this one is classy (props to another user I don't know his username):
static public function isMulti($array)
{
$result = array_unique(array_map("gettype",$array));
return count($result) == 1 && array_shift($result) == "array";
}
In my case. I stuck in vary strange condition.
1st case = array("data"=> "name");
2nd case = array("data"=> array("name"=>"username","fname"=>"fname"));
But if data has array instead of value then sizeof() or count() function not work for this condition. Then i create custom function to check.
If first index of array have value then it return "only value"
But if index have array instead of value then it return "has array"
I use this way
function is_multi($a) {
foreach ($a as $v) {
if (is_array($v))
{
return "has array";
break;
}
break;
}
return 'only value';
}
Special thanks to Vinko Vrsalovic
Its as simple as
$isMulti = !empty(array_filter($array, function($e) {
return is_array($e);
}));
This function will return int number of array dimensions (stolen from here).
function countdim($array)
{
if (is_array(reset($array)))
$return = countdim(reset($array)) + 1;
else
$return = 1;
return $return;
}
Try as follows
if (count($arrayList) != count($arrayList, COUNT_RECURSIVE))
{
echo 'arrayList is multidimensional';
}else{
echo 'arrayList is no multidimensional';
}
$is_multi_array = array_reduce(array_keys($arr), function ($carry, $key) use ($arr) { return $carry && is_array($arr[$key]); }, true);
Here is a nice one liner. It iterates over every key to check if the value at that key is an array. This will ensure true
Related
on http://php.net/manual/en/function.in-array.php - if you scroll down it gives a function to determine if a string is inside of a query in a multidimensional array. "If you found yourself in need of a multidimensional array in_array like function you can use the one below. Works in a fair amount of time"
Here's original code(working):
function in_multiarray($elem, $array)
{
$top = sizeof($array) - 1;
$bottom = 0;
while($bottom <= $top)
{
if($array[$bottom] == $elem)
return true;
else
if(is_array($array[$bottom]))
if(in_multiarray($elem, ($array[$bottom])))
return true;
$bottom++;
}
return false;
}
What I'm trying to do is instead of returning 'true' or 'false' - i'd like to return the ROW #. So my initial thought was to simply replace 'return true' with 'return $bottom; however it isn't returning the record number.
Modified Function (not working);
function in_multiarray($elem, $array)
{
$top = sizeof($array) - 1;
$bottom = 0;
while($bottom <= $top)
{
if($array[$bottom] == $elem)
return $bottom;
else
if(is_array($array[$bottom]))
if(in_multiarray($elem, ($array[$bottom])))
return $bottom;
$bottom++;
}
return false;
}
Does anyone have an idea how to modify this function to return the ROW number that contains the match?
Here's a sample of the array...
$sample = array
array ("oldpage1.php","newpage1.php"),
array ("oldpage2.php","newpage2.php"),
array ("oldpage3.php","newpage3.php"),
array ("oldpage4.php","newpage4.php"),
array ("oldpage5.php","newpage5.php")
etc.
);
$row = in_multiarray($input, $sample);
Therefore if we know the row # we can fetch the new page with a simple
$newpage=$sample[$row][1]
Thanks!
It's worth noting that a function like in_array is intended to tell you whether or not a value exists inside of an array. What you're looking for seems to be a lot closer to something like array_search, which is designed to actually provide you with the key that points to a given value in the array.
However, because you're using a multi-dimensional array what you're actually looking for is the key that points to the array that contains the value. Hence we can divide and conquer this problem with two simple steps.
Map
Filter
The first step is to map a function in_array to every element in the first array (which is just another array). This will tell us which elements of the primary array contain an array that contains the value we're searching for.
$result = array_map(function($arr) use($search) {
return in_array($search, $arr, true);
}, $arr, [$searchValue]);
The second step is to then return the keys to those arrays (i.e. filter the result).
$keys = array_keys(array_filter($result));
Now you have all the keys of any matching items. If you want to apply as just one custom filter that specifies exactly where in the subarray to look, you could also do it like this.
$search = "oldpage2.php";
$sample = [
["oldpage1.php","newpage1.php"],
["oldpage2.php","newpage2.php"],
["oldpage3.php","newpage3.php"],
["oldpage4.php","newpage4.php"],
["oldpage5.php","newpage5.php"],
];
$keys = array_keys(array_filter($sample, function($arr) use($search) {
return $arr[0] === $search;
}));
var_dump($keys);
And you get...
array(1) {
[0]=>
int(1)
}
So now you know that "oldpage2.php" is in row 1 in $sample[1][0] which means you can do this to get the results out of the array.
foreach($keys as $key) {
echo "{$sample[$key][0]} maps to {$sample[$key][1]}\n";
}
Giving you
oldpage2.php maps to newpage2.php
If you want to return only the first result you could do that as well with a function like this using similar approach.
function getFirstMatch($search, Array $arr) {
foreach($arr as $key => $value) {
if ($value[0] === $search) {
return $value[1];
}
}
}
echo getFirstMatch("oldpage4.php", $sample); // newpage4.php
The Better Alternative
Of course, the better approach is to actually use the oldpage names as the actual keys of the array rather than do this expensive search through the array, because array lookup by key in PHP is just an O(1) operation, whereas this needle/haystack approach is O(N).
So we turn your $samples array into something like this and the search no longer requires any functions...
$samples = [
"oldpage1.php" => "newpage1.php",
"oldpage2.php" => "newpage2.php",
"oldpage3.php" => "newpage3.php",
"oldpage4.php" => "newpage4.php",
"oldpage5.php" => "newpage5.php",
];
Now you can just do something like $newpage = $samples[$search] and you get exactly what you're looking for. So echo $samples["oldpage2.php"] gives you "newpage2.php" directly without the intermediary step of searching through each array.
You can use the following code to get the full path to the value:
function in_multiarray($elem, $array, &$result)
{
$top = sizeof($array) - 1;
$bottom = 0;
while($bottom <= $top)
{
if($array[$bottom] == $elem) {
array_unshift($result, $bottom);
return true;
}
else {
if(is_array($array[$bottom])) {
if(in_multiarray($elem, $array[$bottom], $result)) {
array_unshift($result, $bottom);
return true;
}
}
}
$bottom++;
}
array_shift($result);
return false;
}
$sample = array(
array ("oldpage1.php","newpage1.php"),
array ("oldpage2.php","newpage2.php"),
array ("oldpage3.php","newpage3.php"),
array ("oldpage4.php","newpage4.php"),
array ("oldpage5.php","newpage5.php")
);
$input = "newpage5.php";
$result = [];
in_multiarray($input, $sample, $result);
print_r($result);
Path is stored in $result;
I am trying to manually sort a PHP array without making use of ksort.
This is how my code looks at the moment:
function my_ksort(&$arg){
foreach($arg as $key1 => $value1){
foreach($arg as $key2 => $value2){
if($key1 > $key2){
$aux = $value2;
$arg[$key2] = $value1;
$arg[$key1] = $aux;
}
}
}
}
It doesn't sort, I can't figure out how to make it sort.
You could try this:
function my_ksort(&$arg)
{
$keys=array_keys($arg);
sort($keys);
foreach($keys as $key)
{
$val=$arg[$key];
unset($arg[$key]);
$arg[$key]=$val;
}
}
I'm sorting the keys separately and then deleting the elements one-by-one and appending them to the end, in ascending order.
I'm using another sorting function (sort()), but if you want to eliminate all available sorting functions from your emulation, sort() is much easier to emulate. In fact, #crypticous's algorithm does just that!
This function return array in ASC. Take in consideration that I'm using goto which is supported in (PHP 5 >= 5.3.0)
function ascending_array($array){
if (!is_array($array)){
$array = explode(",", $array);
}
$new = array();
$flag = true;
iter:
$array = array_values($array); // recount array values with new offsets
(isset($min["max"])) ? $min["value"] = $min["max"] : $min["value"] = $array[0];
$min["offset"] = 0;
for ($i=0;$i<count($array);$i++){
if ($array[$i] < $min["value"]){ // redefine min values each time if statement executed
$min["value"] = $array[$i];
$min["offset"] = $i;
}
if ($flag){ // execute only first time
if ($array[$i] > $min["value"]){ // define max value from array
$min["max"] = $array[$i];
}
$flag = false;
}
if ($i === (count($array)-1)){ // last array element
array_push($new,$min["value"]);
unset($array[$min["offset"]]);
}
}
if (count($array)!=0){
goto iter;
}
print_r($new);
}
$arr = array(50,25,98,45);
ascending_array($arr); // 25 45 50 98
PS. When I was studying php, I wrote this function and now remembered that I had it (that's why I really don't remember what I am doing in it, though fact is it's working properly and hopefully there are comments too), hope you'll enjoy :)
DEMO
I was checking some issue related to this post and i wanted to give my insight about it ! here's what i would have done to implement php's sort :
$array_res = array();
$array = array(50,25,98,45);
$i=0;
$temp = $array[0];
$key = array_search($temp, $array);
while ($i<count($array)-1){
$temp = $array[0];
for($n=0;$n<count($array) ;$n++)
{
if($array[$n]< $temp && $array[$n] != -1 )
{
$temp = $array[$n];
}
else{continue;}
}
//get the index for later deletion
$key = array_search($temp, $array);
array_push($array_res, $temp);
/// flag on those which were ordered
$array[$key] =-1;
$i++;
}
// lastly append the highest number
for($n=0;$n<count($array) ;$n++)
{
if ($array[$n] != -1)
array_push($array_res, $array[$n]);
}
// display the results
print_r($array_res);
This code will display : Array
(
[0] => 25
[1] => 45
[2] => 50
[3] => 98
)
Short and sweet
function custom_ksort($arg)
{
$keys = array_keys($arg);
sort($keys);
foreach($keys as $newV)
{
$newArr[$newV] = $arg[$newV];
}
return $newArr;
}
It looks like your issue is that you're changing "temporary" characters $key1 and $key2 but not the actual arrays. You have to change $arg, not just $key1 and $key2.
Try something like:
$arr = Array(3=>"a",7=>"b");
print_r( $arr );
foreach( $arr as $k=>$v ){
unset($arr[$k]);
$arr[$k+1] = $v;
}
print_r($arr);
How can I determine if one array is a subset of another (all elements in the first are present in the second)?
$s1 = "string1>string2>string3>string4>string5>string6>";
$arr1 = explode(">", $s1);
$s2 = "string1>string4>string5";
$arr2 = explode(">", $s2);
$isSubset = /* ??? */
if (array_intersect($array1, $array2) == $array1) {
// $array1 is a subset of $array2
}
Simple: use array subtraction.
On array subtraction, you will know whether or not one array is a subset of the other.
Example:
if (!array_diff($array1, $array2)) {
// $array1 is a subset of $array2
}
Reference: array_diff
You can use array_intersect also.
Try that
If you start from strings, you could check strstr($fullString,$subsetStr);. But that'll only work when all chars have the same order: 'abcd','cd' will work, but 'abcd','ad' won't.
But instead of writing your own, custom, function you should know that PHP has TONS of array functions, so its neigh on impossible that there isn't a std function that can do what you need it to do. In this case, I'd suggest array_diff:
$srcString = explode('>','string1>string2>string3>string4>string5');
$subset = explode('>','string3>string2>string5');
$isSubset = array_diff($subset,$srcString);
//if (empty($isSubset)) --> cf comments: somewhat safer branch:
if (!$isSubset)
{
echo 'Subset';
return true;
}
else
{
echo 'Nope, substrings: '.implode(', ',$isSubset).' Didn\'t match';
return false;
}
I would create an associated array of the larger array, then iterate through the smaller array, looking for a non collision, if you find one, return false.
function isSubset($arr1,$arr2){
$map = Array();
for ($i=0;$i<count($arr1);$i++){
$map[$arr[$i]]=true;
}
for ($i=0;$i<count($arr2);$i++){
if (!isset($map[$arr2[$i]])){
return false;
}
}
return true;
$s1 = "1>2>3>4>5>6>7";
$arr1 = explode(">",$s1);
$s2 = "1>2>3";
$arr2 = explode(">",$s2);
if(isSub($arr1,$arr2)){
echo 'true';
}else{
echo 'false';
}
function isSub($a1,$a2){
$num2 = count($a2);
$sub = $num2;
for($i = 0;$i < $num2 ;$i++){
if(in_array($a2[$i],$a1)){
$sub--;
}
}
return ($sub==0)? true:false;
}
Simple function which will return true if array is exact subset otherwise false. Solution is applicable for two dimensional array as well.
function is_array_subset($superArr, $subArr) {
foreach ($subArr as $key => $value) {
//check if keys not set in super array OR values are unequal in both array.
if (!isset($superArr[$key]) || $superArr[$key] != $value) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
What would be the fastest, most efficient way to implement a search method that will return an object with a qualifying id?
Sample object array:
$array = [
(object) ['id' => 'one', 'color' => 'white'],
(object) ['id' => 'two', 'color' => 'red'],
(object) ['id' => 'three', 'color' => 'blue']
];
What do I write inside of:
function findObjectById($id){
}
The desired result would return the object at $array[0] if I called:
$obj = findObjectById('one')
Otherwise, it would return false if I passed 'four' as the parameter.
You can iterate that objects:
function findObjectById($id){
$array = array( /* your array of objects */ );
foreach ( $array as $element ) {
if ( $id == $element->id ) {
return $element;
}
}
return false;
}
Edit:
Faster way is to have an array with keys equals to objects' ids (if unique);
Then you can build your function as follow:
function findObjectById($id){
$array = array( /* your array of objects with ids as keys */ );
if ( isset( $array[$id] ) ) {
return $array[$id];
}
return false;
}
It's an old question but for the canonical reference as it was missing in the pure form:
$obj = array_column($array, null, 'id')['one'] ?? false;
The false is per the questions requirement to return false. It represents the non-matching value, e.g. you can make it null for example as an alternative suggestion.
This works transparently since PHP 7.0. In case you (still) have an older version, there are user-space implementations of it that can be used as a drop-in replacement.
However array_column also means to copy a whole array. This might not be wanted.
Instead it could be used to index the array and then map over with array_flip:
$index = array_column($array, 'id');
$map = array_flip($index);
$obj = $array[$map['one'] ?? null] ?? false;
On the index the search problem might still be the same, the map just offers the index in the original array so there is a reference system.
Keep in mind thought that this might not be necessary as PHP has copy-on-write. So there might be less duplication as intentionally thought. So this is to show some options.
Another option is to go through the whole array and unless the object is already found, check for a match. One way to do this is with array_reduce:
$obj = array_reduce($array, static function ($carry, $item) {
return $carry === false && $item->id === 'one' ? $item : $carry;
}, false);
This variant again is with the returning false requirement for no-match.
It is a bit more straight forward with null:
$obj = array_reduce($array, static function ($carry, $item) {
return $carry ?? ($item->id === 'one' ? $item : $carry);
}, null);
And a different no-match requirement can then be added with $obj = ...) ?? false; for example.
Fully exposing to foreach within a function of its own even has the benefit to directly exit on match:
$result = null;
foreach ($array as $object) {
if ($object->id === 'one') {
$result = $object;
break;
}
}
unset($object);
$obj = $result ?? false;
This is effectively the original answer by hsz, which shows how universally it can be applied.
You can use the function array_search of php like this
$key=array_search("one", array_column(json_decode(json_encode($array),TRUE), 'color'));
var_dump($array[$key]);
i: is the index of item in array
1: is the property value looking for
$arr: Array looking inside
'ID': the property key
$i = array_search(1, array_column($arr, 'ID'));
$element = ($i !== false ? $arr[$i] : null);
Well, you would would have to loop through them and check compare the ID's unless your array is sorted (by ID) in which case you can implement a searching algorithm like binary search or something of that sort to make it quicker.
My suggestion would be to first sort the arrays using a sorting algorithm (binary sort, insertion sort or quick sort) if the array is not sorted already. Then you can implement a search algorithm which should improve performance and I think that's as good as it gets.
http://www.algolist.net/Algorithms/Binary_search
This is my absolute favorite algorithm for very quickly finding what I need in a very large array, quickly. It is a Binary Search Algorithm implementation I created and use extensively in my PHP code. It hands-down beats straight-forward iterative search routines. You can vary it a multitude of ways to fit your need, but the basic algorithm remains the same.
To use it (this variation), the array must be sorted, by the index you want to find, in lowest-to-highest order.
function quick_find(&$array, $property, $value_to_find, &$first_index) {
$l = 0;
$r = count($array) - 1;
$m = 0;
while ($l <= $r) {
$m = floor(($l + $r) / 2);
if ($array[$m]->{$property} < $value_to_find) {
$l = $m + 1;
} else if ($array[$m]->{$property} > $value_to_find) {
$r = $m - 1;
} else {
$first_index = $m;
return $array[$m];
}
}
return FALSE;
}
And to test it out:
/* Define a class to put into our array of objects */
class test_object {
public $index;
public $whatever_you_want;
public function __construct( $index_to_assign ) {
$this->index = $index_to_assign;
$this->whatever_you_want = rand(1, 10000000);
}
}
/* Initialize an empty array we will fill with our objects */
$my_array = array();
/* Get a random starting index to simulate data (possibly loaded from a database) */
$my_index = rand(1256, 30000);
/* Say we are needing to locate the record with this index */
$index_to_locate = $my_index + rand(200, 30234);
/*
* Fill "$my_array()" with ONE MILLION objects of type "test_object"
*
* 1,000,000 objects may take a little bit to generate. If you don't
* feel patient, you may lower the number!
*
*/
for ($i = 0; $i < 1000000; $i++) {
$searchable_object = new test_object($my_index); // Create the object
array_push($my_array, $searchable_object); // Add it to the "$my_array" array
$my_index++; /* Increment our unique index */
}
echo "Searching array of ".count($my_array)." objects for index: " . $index_to_locate ."\n\n";
$index_found = -1; // Variable into which the array-index at which our object was found will be placed upon return of the function.
$object = quick_find($my_array, "index", $index_to_locate, $index_found);
if ($object == NULL) {
echo "Index $index_to_locate was not contained in the array.\n";
} else {
echo "Object found at index $index_found!\n";
print_r($object);
}
echo "\n\n";
Now, a few notes:
You MAY use this to find non-unique indexes; the array MUST still be sorted in ascending order. Then, when it finds an element matching your criteria, you must walk the array backwards to find the first element, or forward to find the last. It will add a few "hops" to your search, but it will still most likely be faster than iterating a large array.
For STRING indexes, you can change the arithmetic comparisons (i.e. " > " and " < " ) in quick_find() to PHP's function "strcasecmp()". Just make sure the STRING indexes are sorted the same way (for the example implementation): Alphabetically and Ascending.
And if you want to have a version that can search arrays of objects sorted in EITHER ascending OR decending order:
function quick_find_a(&$array, $property, $value_to_find, &$first_index) {
$l = 0;
$r = count($array) - 1;
$m = 0;
while ($l <= $r) {
$m = floor(($l + $r) / 2);
if ($array[$m]->{$property} < $value_to_find) {
$l = $m + 1;
} else if ($array[$m]->{$property} > $value_to_find) {
$r = $m - 1;
} else {
$first_index = $m;
return $array[$m];
}
}
return FALSE;
}
function quick_find_d(&$array, $property, $value_to_find, &$first_index) {
$l = 0;
$r = count($array) - 1;
$m = 0;
while ($l <= $r) {
$m = floor(($l + $r) / 2);
if ($value_to_find > $array[$m]->{$property}) {
$r = $m - 1;
} else if ($value_to_find < $array[$m]->{$property}) {
$l = $m + 1;
} else {
$first_index = $m;
return $array[$m];
}
}
return FALSE;
}
function quick_find(&$array, $property, $value_to_find, &$first_index) {
if ($array[0]->{$property} < $array[count($array)-1]->{$property}) {
return quick_find_a($array, $property, $value_to_find, $first_index);
} else {
return quick_find_d($array, $property, $value_to_find, $first_index);
}
}
The thing with performance of data structures is not only how to get but mostly how to store my data.
If you are free to design your array, use an associative array:
$array['one']->id = 'one';
$array['one']->color = 'white';
$array['two']->id = 'two';
$array['two']->color = 'red';
$array['three']->id = 'three';
$array['three']->color = 'blue';
Finding is then the most cheap: $one = $array['one];
UPDATE:
If you cannot modify your array constitution, you could create a separate array which maps ids to indexes. Finding an object this way does not cost any time:
$map['one'] = 0;
$map['two'] = 1;
$map['three'] = 2;
...
getObjectById() then first lookups the index of the id within the original array and secondly returns the right object:
$index = $map[$id];
return $array[$index];
Something I like to do in these situations is to create a referential array, thus avoiding having to re-copy the object but having the power to use the reference to it like the object itself.
$array['one']->id = 'one';
$array['one']->color = 'white';
$array['two']->id = 'two';
$array['two']->color = 'red';
$array['three']->id = 'three';
$array['three']->color = 'blue';
Then we can create a simple referential array:
$ref = array();
foreach ( $array as $row )
$ref[$row->id] = &$array[$row->id];
Now we can simply test if an instance exists in the array and even use it like the original object if we wanted:
if ( isset( $ref['one'] ) )
echo $ref['one']->color;
would output:
white
If the id in question did not exist, the isset() would return false, so there's no need to iterate the original object over and over looking for a value...we just use PHP's isset() function and avoid using a separate function altogether.
Please note when using references that you want use the "&" with the original array and not the iterator, so using &$row would not give you what you want.
This is definitely not efficient, O(N). But it looks sexy:
$result = array_reduce($array, function ($found, $obj) use ($id) {
return $obj['id'] == $id ? $obj : $found;
}, null);
addendum:
I see hakre already posted something akin to this.
Here is what I use. Reusable functions that loop through an array of objects. The second one allows you to retrieve a single object directly out of all matches (the first one to match criteria).
function get_objects_where($match, $objects) {
if ($match == '' || !is_array($match)) return array ();
$wanted_objects = array ();
foreach ($objects as $object) {
$wanted = false;
foreach ($match as $k => $v) {
if (is_object($object) && isset($object->$k) && $object->$k == $v) {
$wanted = true;
} else {
$wanted = false;
break;
};
};
if ($wanted) $wanted_objects[] = $object;
};
return $wanted_objects;
};
function get_object_where($match, $objects) {
if ($match == '' || !is_array($match)) return (object) array ();
$wanted_objects = get_objects_where($match, $objects);
return count($wanted_objects) > 0 ? $wanted_objects[0] : (object) array ();
};
The easiest way:
function objectToArray($obj) {
return json_decode(json_encode($obj), true);
}
I have the following code:
if ($_POST['submit'] == "Next") {
foreach($_POST['info'] as $key => $value) {
echo $value;
}
}
How do I get the foreach function to start from the 2nd key in the array?
For reasonably small arrays, use array_slice to create a second one:
foreach(array_slice($_POST['info'],1) as $key=>$value)
{
echo $value;
}
foreach(array_slice($_POST['info'], 1) as $key=>$value) {
echo $value;
}
Alternatively if you don't want to copy the array you could just do:
$isFirst = true;
foreach($_POST['info'] as $key=>$value) {
if ($isFirst) {
$isFirst = false;
continue;
}
echo $value;
}
Couldn't you just unset the array...
So if I had an array where I didn't want the first instance,
I could just:
unset($array[0]);
and that would remove the instance from the array.
If you were working with a normal array, I'd say to use something like
foreach (array_slice($ome_array, 1) as $k => $v {...
but, since you're looking at a user request, you don't have any real guarantees on the order in which the arguments might be returned - some browser/proxy might change its behavior or you might simply decide to modify your form in the future. Either way, it's in your best interest to ignore the ordering of the array and treat POST values as an unordered hash map, leaving you with two options :
copy the array and unset the key you want to ignore
loop through the whole array and continue when seeing the key you wish to ignore
in loop:
if ($key == 0) //or whatever
continue;
Alternative way is to use array pointers:
reset($_POST['info']); //set pointer to zero
while ($value=next($_POST['info']) //ponter+1, return value
{
echo key($_POST['info']).":".$value."\n";
}
If you're willing to throw the first element away, you can use array_shift(). However, this is slow on a huge array. A faster operation would be
reset($a);
unset(key($a));
On a array filled with 1000 elements the difference is quite minimal.
Test:
<?php
function slice($a)
{
foreach(array_slice($a, 1) as $key)
{
}
return true;
}
function skip($a)
{
$first = false;
foreach($a as $key)
{
if($first)
{
$first = false;
continue;
}
}
return true;
}
$array = array_fill(0, 1000, 'test');
$t1 = time() + microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < 1000; $i++)
{
slice($array);
}
var_dump((time() + microtime(true)) - $t1);
echo '<hr />';
$t2 = time() + microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < 1000; $i++)
{
skip($array);
}
var_dump((time() + microtime(true)) - $t2);
?>
Output:
float(0.23605012893677)
float(0.24102783203125)
Working Code From My Website For Skipping The First Result and Then Continue.
<?php
$counter = 0;
foreach ($categoriest as $category) { if ($counter++ == 0) continue; ?>
It is working on opencart also in tpl file do like this in case you need.
foreach($_POST['info'] as $key=>$value) {
if ($key == 0) { //or what ever the first key you're using is
continue;
} else {
echo $value;
}
}
if you structure your form differently
<input type='text' name='quiz[first]' value=""/>
<input type='text' name='quiz[second]' value=""/>
...then in your PHP
if( isset($_POST['quiz']) AND
is_array($_POST['quiz'])) {
//...and we'll skip $_POST['quiz']['first']
foreach($_POST['quiz'] as $key => $val){
if($key == "first") continue;
print $val;
}
}
...you can now just loop over that particular structure and access rest normally
How about something like this? Read off the first key and value using key() and current(), then array_shift() to dequeue the front element from the array (EDIT: Don't use array_shift(), it renumbers any numerical indices in the array, which you don't always want!).
<?php
$arr = array(
'one' => "ONE!!",
'two' => "TWO!!",
'three' => "TREE",
4 => "Fourth element",
99 => "We skipped a few here.."
) ;
$firstKey = key( $arr ) ;
$firstVal = current( $arr ) ;
echo( "OK, first values are $firstKey, $firstVal" ) ;
####array_shift( $arr ) ; #'dequeue' front element # BAD! renumbers!
unset( $arr[ $firstKey ] ) ; # BETTER!
echo( "Now for the rest of them" ) ;
foreach( $arr as $key=>$val )
{
echo( "$key => $val" ) ;
}
?>