best way to obtain a lock in php - php

I'm trying to update a variable in APC, and will be many processes trying to do that.
APC doesn't provide locking functionality, so I'm considering using other mechanisms... what I've found so far is mysql's GET_LOCK(), and php's flock(). Anything else worth considering?
Update: I've found sem_acquire, but it seems to be a blocking lock.

/*
CLASS ExclusiveLock
Description
==================================================================
This is a pseudo implementation of mutex since php does not have
any thread synchronization objects
This class uses flock() as a base to provide locking functionality.
Lock will be released in following cases
1 - user calls unlock
2 - when this lock object gets deleted
3 - when request or script ends
==================================================================
Usage:
//get the lock
$lock = new ExclusiveLock( "mylock" );
//lock
if( $lock->lock( ) == FALSE )
error("Locking failed");
//--
//Do your work here
//--
//unlock
$lock->unlock();
===================================================================
*/
class ExclusiveLock
{
protected $key = null; //user given value
protected $file = null; //resource to lock
protected $own = FALSE; //have we locked resource
function __construct( $key )
{
$this->key = $key;
//create a new resource or get exisitng with same key
$this->file = fopen("$key.lockfile", 'w+');
}
function __destruct()
{
if( $this->own == TRUE )
$this->unlock( );
}
function lock( )
{
if( !flock($this->file, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB))
{ //failed
$key = $this->key;
error_log("ExclusiveLock::acquire_lock FAILED to acquire lock [$key]");
return FALSE;
}
ftruncate($this->file, 0); // truncate file
//write something to just help debugging
fwrite( $this->file, "Locked\n");
fflush( $this->file );
$this->own = TRUE;
return TRUE; // success
}
function unlock( )
{
$key = $this->key;
if( $this->own == TRUE )
{
if( !flock($this->file, LOCK_UN) )
{ //failed
error_log("ExclusiveLock::lock FAILED to release lock [$key]");
return FALSE;
}
ftruncate($this->file, 0); // truncate file
//write something to just help debugging
fwrite( $this->file, "Unlocked\n");
fflush( $this->file );
$this->own = FALSE;
}
else
{
error_log("ExclusiveLock::unlock called on [$key] but its not acquired by caller");
}
return TRUE; // success
}
};

You can use the apc_add function to achieve this without resorting to file systems or mysql. apc_add only succeeds when the variable is not already stored; thus, providing a mechanism of locking. TTL can be used to ensure that falied lockholders won't keep on holding the lock forever.
The reason apc_add is the correct solution is because it avoids the race condition that would otherwise exist between checking the lock and setting it to 'locked by you'. Since apc_add only sets the value if it's not already set ( "adds" it to the cache ), it ensures that the lock can't be aquired by two calls at once, regardless of their proximity in time. No solution that doesn't check and set the lock at the same time will inherently suffer from this race condition; one atomic operation is required to successfully lock without race condition.
Since APC locks will only exist in the context of that php execution, it's probably not the best solution for general locking, as it doesn't support locks between hosts. Memcache also provides an atomic add function and thus can also be used with this technique - which is one method of locking between hosts. Redis also supports atomic 'SETNX' functions and TTL, and is a very common method of locking and synchronization between hosts. Howerver, the OP requests a solution for APC in particular.

If the point of the lock is to prevent multiple processes from trying to populate an empty cache key, why wouldn't you want to have a blocking lock?
$value = apc_fetch($KEY);
if ($value === FALSE) {
shm_acquire($SEMAPHORE);
$recheck_value = apc_fetch($KEY);
if ($recheck_value !== FALSE) {
$new_value = expensive_operation();
apc_store($KEY, $new_value);
$value = $new_value;
} else {
$value = $recheck_value;
}
shm_release($SEMAPHORE);
}
If the cache is good, you just roll with it. If there's nothing in the cache, you get a lock. Once you have the lock, you'll need to double-check the cache to make sure that, while you were waiting to get the lock, the cache wasn't repopulated. If the cache was repopulated, use that value & release the lock, otherwise, you do the computation, populate the cache & then release your lock.

Actually, check to see if this will work better then Peter's suggestion.
http://us2.php.net/flock
use an exclusive lock and if your comfortable with it, put everything else that attempted to lock the file in a 2-3 second sleep. If done right your site will experience a hang regarding the locked resource but not a horde of scripts fighting to cache the samething.

If you don't mind basing your lock on the filesystem, then you could use fopen() with mode 'x'. Here is an example:
$f = fopen("lockFile.txt", 'x');
if($f) {
$me = getmypid();
$now = date('Y-m-d H:i:s');
fwrite($f, "Locked by $me at $now\n");
fclose($f);
doStuffInLock();
unlink("lockFile.txt"); // unlock
}
else {
echo "File is locked: " . file_get_contents("lockFile.txt");
exit;
}
See www.php.net/fopen

I realize this is a year old, but I just stumbled upon the question while doing some research myself on locking in PHP.
It occurs to me that a solution might be possible using APC itself. Call me crazy, but this might be a workable approach:
function acquire_lock($key, $expire=60) {
if (is_locked($key)) {
return null;
}
return apc_store($key, true, $expire);
}
function release_lock($key) {
if (!is_locked($key)) {
return null;
}
return apc_delete($key);
}
function is_locked($key) {
return apc_fetch($key);
}
// example use
if (acquire_lock("foo")) {
do_something_that_requires_a_lock();
release_lock("foo");
}
In practice I might throw another function in there to generate a key to use here, just to prevent collision with an existing APC key, e.g.:
function key_for_lock($str) {
return md5($str."locked");
}
The $expire parameter is a nice feature of APC to use, since it prevents your lock from being held forever if your script dies or something like that.
Hopefully this answer is helpful for anyone else who stumbles here a year later.

EAccelerator has methods for it; eaccelerator_lock and eaccelerator_unlock.

Can't say if this is the best way to handle the job, but at least it is convenient.
function WhileLocked($pathname, callable $function, $proj = ' ')
{
// create a semaphore for a given pathname and optional project id
$semaphore = sem_get(ftok($pathname, $proj)); // see ftok for details
sem_acquire($semaphore);
try {
// capture result
$result = call_user_func($function);
} catch (Exception $e) {
// release lock and pass on all errors
sem_release($semaphore);
throw $e;
}
// also release lock if all is good
sem_release($semaphore);
return $result;
}
Usage is as simple as this.
$result = WhileLocked(__FILE__, function () use ($that) {
$this->doSomethingNonsimultaneously($that->getFoo());
});
Third optional argument can come handy if you use this function more than once per file.
Last but not least it isn't hard to modify this function (while keeping its signature) to use any other kind of locking mechanism at a later date, e.g. if you happen to find yourself working with multiple servers.

APC is now considered unmaintained and dead. It's successor APCu offers locking via apcu_entry. But be aware, that it also prohibits the concurrent execution of any other APCu functions. Depending on your use case, this might be OK for you.
From the manual:
Note: When control enters apcu_entry() the lock for the cache is acquired exclusively, it is released when control leaves apcu_entry(): In effect, this turns the body of generator into a critical section, disallowing two processes from executing the same code paths concurrently. In addition, it prohibits the concurrent execution of any other APCu functions, since they will acquire the same lock.

APCu has apcu_entry since 5.1.0, can implement a lock mechanism with it now:
/** get a lock, will wait until the lock is available,
* make sure handle deadlock yourself :p
*
* useage : $lock = lock('THE_LOCK_KEY', uniqid(), 50);
*
* #param $lock_key : the lock you want to get it
* #param $lock_value : the unique value to specify lock owner
* #param $retry_millis : wait befor retry
* #return ['lock_key'=>$lock_key, 'lock_value'=>$lock_value]
*/
function lock($lock_key, $lock_value, $retry_millis) {
$got_lock = false;
while (!$got_lock) {
$fetched_lock_value = apcu_entry($lock_key, function ($key) use ($lock_value) {
return $lock_value;
}, 100);
$got_lock = ($fetched_lock_value == $lock_value);
if (!$got_lock) usleep($retry_millis*1000);
}
return ['lock_key'=>$lock_key, 'lock_value'=>$lock_value];
}
/** release a lock
*
* usage : unlock($lock);
*
* #param $lock : return value of function lock
*/
function unlock($lock) {
apcu_delete($lock['lock_key']);
}

What I've found, actually, is that I don't need any locking at all... given what I'm trying to create is a map of all the class => path associations for autoload, it doesn't matter if one process overwrites what the other one has found (it's highly unlikely, if coded properly), because the data will get there eventually anyway. So, the solution turned out to be "no locks".

Related

How to avoid race hazard with multiple requests?

In order to protect script form race hazard, I am considering approach described by code sample
$file = 'yxz.lockctrl';
// if file exists, it means that some other request is running
while (file_exists($file))
{
sleep(1);
}
file_put_contents($file, '');
// do some work
unlink($file);
If I go this way, is it possible to create file with same name simultaneously from multiple requests?
I know that there is php mutex. I would like to handle this situation without any extensions (if possible).
Task for the program is to handle bids in auctions application. I would like to process every bid request sequentially. With most possible latency.
From what I understand you want to make sure only a single process at a time is running a certain piece of code. A mutex or similar mechanism could be used for this. I myself use lockfiles to have a solution that works on many platforms and doesn't rely on a specific library only available on Linux etc.
For that, I have written a small Lock class. Do note that it uses some non-standard functions from my library, for instance, to get where to store temporary files etc. But you could easily change that.
<?php
class Lock
{
private $_owned = false;
private $_name = null;
private $_lockFile = null;
private $_lockFilePointer = null;
public function __construct($name)
{
$this->_name = $name;
$this->_lockFile = PluginManager::getInstance()->getCorePlugin()->getTempDir('locks') . $name . '-' . sha1($name . PluginManager::getInstance()->getCorePlugin()->getPreference('EncryptionKey')->getValue()).'.lock';
}
public function __destruct()
{
$this->release();
}
/**
* Acquires a lock
*
* Returns true on success and false on failure.
* Could be told to wait (block) and if so for a max amount of seconds or return false right away.
*
* #param bool $wait
* #param null $maxWaitTime
* #return bool
* #throws \Exception
*/
public function acquire($wait = false, $maxWaitTime = null) {
$this->_lockFilePointer = fopen($this->_lockFile, 'c');
if(!$this->_lockFilePointer) {
throw new \RuntimeException(__('Unable to create lock file', 'dliCore'));
}
if($wait && $maxWaitTime === null) {
$flags = LOCK_EX;
}
else {
$flags = LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB;
}
$startTime = time();
while(1) {
if (flock($this->_lockFilePointer, $flags)) {
$this->_owned = true;
return true;
} else {
if($maxWaitTime === null || time() - $startTime > $maxWaitTime) {
fclose($this->_lockFilePointer);
return false;
}
sleep(1);
}
}
}
/**
* Releases the lock
*/
public function release()
{
if($this->_owned) {
#flock($this->_lockFilePointer, LOCK_UN);
#fclose($this->_lockFilePointer);
#unlink($this->_lockFile);
$this->_owned = false;
}
}
}
Usage
Now you can have two process that run at the same time and execute the same script
Process 1
$lock = new Lock('runExpensiveFunction');
if($lock->acquire()) {
// Some expensive function that should only run one at a time
runExpensiveFunction();
$lock->release();
}
Process 2
$lock = new Lock('runExpensiveFunction');
// Check will be false since the lock will already be held by someone else so the function is skipped
if($lock->acquire()) {
// Some expensive function that should only run one at a time
runExpensiveFunction();
$lock->release();
}
Another alternative would be to have the second process wait for the first one to finish instead of skipping the code.
$lock = new Lock('runExpensiveFunction');
// Process will now wait for the lock to become available. A max wait time can be set if needed.
if($lock->acquire(true)) {
// Some expensive function that should only run one at a time
runExpensiveFunction();
$lock->release();
}
Ram disk
To limit the number of writes to your HDD/SSD with the lockfiles you could crate a RAM disk to store them in.
On Linux you could add something like the following to /etc/fstab
tmpfs /mnt/ramdisk tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec,nodiratime,size=1024M 0 0
On Windows you can download something like ImDisk Toolkit and create a ramdisk with that.

PHP: Best way to Generate an unique numeric ID

I need to generate unique numeric id.
I could use uniqid, but it generates alphanumeric value.
And again I could use time, but there is no guarantee that it
will be unique always.
And again I could use the auto increment property of a field in a
database to get an unique id, but here we must need a database.
So what can be the best way to generate an unique numeric id?
Nothing can guarantee 100% uniqueness.
You need to know uniqueness comparing with what do you need.
And use any algorythm plus check each value in list of all used values.
In the world of programming what you need is called pseudo random number. So it's name actually explains what I mean.
Database systems use exclusive locking when creating numbers such as MySQL's auto_increment which takes care of concurrency and many other intricate details.
You have to approach the problem you have the same way - acquire a lock from the PHP process that's serving the request, look up the current value within some sort of persistent storage, increment it by 1, return it and release the lock.
The easiest way to do this is to use a good old file and exclusive locking.
I'll illustrate with a class (which should be debugged since it's not complete):
class MyAutoIncrement
{
protected $fh = null;
protected $file_path = '';
protected $auto_increment_offset = 1;
public function __construct($file_path, $offset = 1)
{
$this->file_path = $file_path;
$this->auto_increment_offset = $offset;
}
public function autoincrement()
{
if($this->acquire())
{
$current = (int)fread($this->fh);
$next += $this->auto_increment_offset;
fwrite($this->fh, $next);
$this->release();
return $next;
}
return null;
}
public function acquire()
{
$handler = $this->getFileHandler();
return flock($handler, LOCK_EX);
}
public function release($close = false)
{
$handler = $this->getFileHandler();
return flock($handler, LOCK_UN);
if($close)
{
fclose($handler);
$this->fh = null;
}
}
protected function acquireLock($handler)
{
return flock($handler, LOCK_EX);
}
protected function getFileHandler()
{
if(is_null($this->fh))
{
$this->fh = fopen($this->file_path, 'c+');
if($this->fh === false)
{
throw new \Exception(sprintf("Unable to open the specified file: %s", $this->file_path));
}
}
return $this->fh;
}
}
Usage:
$ai = new MyAutoIncrement('/path/to/counter/file.txt');
try
{
$id = $ai->autoincrement();
if(!is_null($id))
{
// Voila, you got your number, do stuff
}
else
{
// We went wrong somewhere
}
}
catch(\Exception $e)
{
// Something went wrong
}
As mentioned before. Nothing can guarantee 100% uniqueness.
Although this will be fairly unique :)
$iUniqueNumber = crc32(uniqid());
See
uniqid and crc32 polynomial of a string.
You can use a combination of time() and getmypid() to get what you need - a numeric unique ID. You can have multiple php processes launched at a given time, but they will never have the same process ID at that given time (unless the server process counter overlaps in less than a second, which is virtually impossible when kernel.pid_max is set correctly).
<?
function getUniqueID() {
return time() . '.' . getmypid();
}
?>
That function will generate a unique ID per script execution per server. It will fail if you call it multiple times in the same script and expect it to return unique value every time. In that case you can define some static variable inside the function body to keep track of that.
You talked about time, what about microtime?
Even if you create two numbers in a row you'll get a diferent value. You'll need of course to play a little around to make it an unique integer, but it should be able to help.
I suggest to concatenate PHP process ID with microtime(true) to increase possibility of having unique value.
function getserial()
{
$fn='/where_you_want/serial.dat';
$fp = fopen($fn, "r+");
if (flock($fp, LOCK_EX)) { $serial=fgets($fp);$serial++; }
else
{ print('lock error, ABORT'); exit; }
$h=fopen($fn.'.tmp','w'); fwrite($h,$serial);fclose($h);
if (filesize($fn.'.tmp')>0)
{
system('rm -f '.$fn.'.tmp');
fseek ($fp, 0);
fwrite($fp,$serial);
}
flock($fp, LOCK_UN); fclose($fp); #chmod($fn,0777);
return $serial;
}
this example will get you a unique serial number, after this, you can be sure it's existing with only one instance.
please note, to avoid data corruption, you must create first your file and put a number first.
(for example, write 1 without enter or anything else)
this is a really simple function, but it's working for me over 10 years now ...
You can make your own increment value to guarantee 100% uniqueness without use heavy algo:
Session unique id :
session_start();
$_SESSION['increment'] = 5;//i fix 5 but you need to get it in bdd,xml,...
function get_new_id(){
$_SESSION['increment']++;
//store new value of increment
return $_SESSION['increment'];
}
$my_unique_id = get_new_id();
echo $my_unique_id;
Global unique id (dont use this !):
function get_new_id(){
$increment = file_get_contents('increment.txt');
$increment++;
file_put_contents('increment.txt', $increment);
return $increment;
}
$my_unique_id = get_new_id();
echo $my_unique_id;

php mutex for ram based wordpress cache in php

Im trying to implement a cache for a high traffic wp site in php. so far ive managed to store the results to a ramfs and load them directly from the htaccess. however during peak hours there are mora than one process generatin certain page and is becoming an issue
i was thinking that a mutex would help and i was wondering if there is a better way than system("mkdir cache.mutex")
From what I understand you want to make sure only a single process at a time is running a certain piece of code. A mutex or similar mechanism could be used for this. I myself use lockfiles to have a solution that works on many platforms and doesn't rely on a specific library only available on Linux etc.
For that, I have written a small Lock class. Do note that it uses some non-standard functions from my library, for instance, to get where to store temporary files etc. But you could easily change that.
<?php
class Lock
{
private $_owned = false;
private $_name = null;
private $_lockFile = null;
private $_lockFilePointer = null;
public function __construct($name)
{
$this->_name = $name;
$this->_lockFile = PluginManager::getInstance()->getCorePlugin()->getTempDir('locks') . $name . '-' . sha1($name . PluginManager::getInstance()->getCorePlugin()->getPreference('EncryptionKey')->getValue()).'.lock';
}
public function __destruct()
{
$this->release();
}
/**
* Acquires a lock
*
* Returns true on success and false on failure.
* Could be told to wait (block) and if so for a max amount of seconds or return false right away.
*
* #param bool $wait
* #param null $maxWaitTime
* #return bool
* #throws \Exception
*/
public function acquire($wait = false, $maxWaitTime = null) {
$this->_lockFilePointer = fopen($this->_lockFile, 'c');
if(!$this->_lockFilePointer) {
throw new \RuntimeException(__('Unable to create lock file', 'dliCore'));
}
if($wait && $maxWaitTime === null) {
$flags = LOCK_EX;
}
else {
$flags = LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB;
}
$startTime = time();
while(1) {
if (flock($this->_lockFilePointer, $flags)) {
$this->_owned = true;
return true;
} else {
if($maxWaitTime === null || time() - $startTime > $maxWaitTime) {
fclose($this->_lockFilePointer);
return false;
}
sleep(1);
}
}
}
/**
* Releases the lock
*/
public function release()
{
if($this->_owned) {
#flock($this->_lockFilePointer, LOCK_UN);
#fclose($this->_lockFilePointer);
#unlink($this->_lockFile);
$this->_owned = false;
}
}
}
Usage
Now you can have two process that run at the same time and execute the same script
Process 1
$lock = new Lock('runExpensiveFunction');
if($lock->acquire()) {
// Some expensive function that should only run one at a time
runExpensiveFunction();
$lock->release();
}
Process 2
$lock = new Lock('runExpensiveFunction');
// Check will be false since the lock will already be held by someone else so the function is skipped
if($lock->acquire()) {
// Some expensive function that should only run one at a time
runExpensiveFunction();
$lock->release();
}
Another alternative would be to have the second process wait for the first one to finish instead of skipping the code.
$lock = new Lock('runExpensiveFunction');
// Process will now wait for the lock to become available. A max wait time can be set if needed.
if($lock->acquire(true)) {
// Some expensive function that should only run one at a time
runExpensiveFunction();
$lock->release();
}
Ram disk
To limit the number of writes to your HDD/SSD with the lockfiles you could create a RAM disk to store them in.
On Linux you could add something like the following to /etc/fstab
tmpfs /mnt/ramdisk tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec,nodiratime,size=1024M 0 0
On Windows you can download something like ImDisk Toolkit and create a ramdisk with that.
I agree with #gries, a reverse proxy is going to be a really good bang-for-the-buck way to get high performance out of a high-volume Wordpress site. I've leveraged Varnish with quite a lot of success, though I suspect you can do so with nginx as well.

Lock process in symfony 1.4

I need a way to prevent multiple run on a process on symfony 1.4.
Something like: when a user is running this process, the other user who tries to run this process will get a warning message inform that the process is running.
Is there a way to implement it without using database?
kirugan's method will probably work in most cases, but it's susceptible to race conditions and can get stuck in the event of a crash.
Here's a more robust solution. It uses PHP's file locking so you know the lock is atomic, and if you forget to release the lock later or your process crashes, it gets released automatically. By default, getting a lock is non-blocking (i.e. if the lock is already held by another process, getLock() will instantly return FALSE). However, you can have the call block (i.e. wait until the lock becomes available) if you'd like. Finally, you can have different locks for different parts of your code. Just use a different name for the lock.
The only requirement is that the directory returned by getLockDir() must be server-writable. Feel free to change the location of the lock dir.
Note: I think flock() may behave differently on Windows (I use linux), so double check that if its an issue for you.
myLock.class.php
class myLock
{
/**
* Creates a lockfile and acquires an exclusive lock on it.
*
* #param string $filename The name of the lockfile.
* #param boolean $blocking Block until lock becomes available (default: don't block, just fail)
* #return mixed Returns the lockfile, or FALSE if a lock could not be acquired.
*/
public static function getLock($name, $blocking = false)
{
$filename = static::getLockDir() . '/' . $name;
if (!preg_match('/\.lo?ck$/', $filename))
{
$filename .= '.lck';
}
if (!file_exists($filename))
{
file_put_contents($filename, '');
chmod($filename, 0777); // if the file cant be opened for writing later, getting the lock will fail
}
$lockFile = fopen($filename, 'w+');
if (!flock($lockFile, $blocking ? LOCK_EX : LOCK_EX|LOCK_NB))
{
fclose($lockFile);
return false;
}
return $lockFile;
}
/**
* Free a lock.
*
* #param resource $lockFile
*/
public static function freeLock($lockFile)
{
if ($lockFile)
{
flock($lockFile, LOCK_UN);
fclose($lockFile);
}
}
public static function getLockDir()
{
return sfConfig::get('sf_root_dir') . '/data/lock';
}
}
How to use
$lockFile = myLock::getLock('lock-name');
if ($lockFile) {
// you have a lock here, do whatever you want
myLock::freeLock($lockFile);
}
else {
// you could not get the lock. show a message or throw an exception or whatever
}
Here is my functions for this:
function lock(){
$file = __DIR__ . '/file.lock';
if(file_exists($file)){
/* exit or whatever you want */
die('ALREADY LOCKED');
}
touch($file);
}
function unlock(){
$file = __DIR__ . '/parser.lock';
if(file_exists($file)){
unlink($file);
}else{
echoln("unlock function: LOCK FILE NOT FOUND");
}
}
function exitHandler(){
echoln('exitHandler function: called');
unlock();
}
Use lock function in the beginning, and set exitHandler function in register_shutdown_function(). You can save this snippets as class with the same methods or save it like helper file

mutex with PHP 5.3.8

I am using PHP 5.3.8 on a web server running Windows XP SP3 and Apache 2.2.21 where I need to create a mutex. After some research, I've come across the flock command and implemented it like this:
class Mutex
{
private $lock_ = null;
// create a mutex with with a given id. This ID must be system unique.
// [string] id - a unique id
// return - true on success
public function Initialize($id)
{
$this->lock_ = fopen($id, 'a');
return is_resource($this->lock_);
}
// destroy the mutex
public function Destroy()
{
$result = false;
if (is_resource($this->lock_));
{
$result = flock($this->lock_, LOCK_UN);
$result &= fclose($this->lock_);
$this->lock_ = null;
}
return $result;
}
// exclusively lock the resource
// return - true on success
public function Lock()
{
if (is_resource($this->lock_))
return flock($this->lock_, LOCK_EX);
return false;
}
// release the locked resource
// return - true on success
public function Release()
{
if (is_resource($this->lock_))
return flock($this->lock_, LOCK_UN);
return false;
}
}
But, when I go to use this class:
$this->cache_lock_ = new Mutex();
$this->cache_lock_->Initialize("e:\\cache_lock");
if ($this->cache_lock_->Lock())
echo "Acquired 1 ".PHP_EOL;
if ($this->cache_lock_->Lock())
echo "Acquired 2 ".PHP_EOL;
$this->cache_lock_->Release();
$this->cache_lock_->Destroy();
I see Acquired 1 Acquired 2 printed indicating the lock was acquired twice despite my specifying that it be exclusive.
Can anybody suggest what I'm doing wrong? Ideally, I would like the second Lock() call toblock until the resource is available.
Thanks,
PaulH
Calling flock() twice on the same file handle will return true both times and would not block, because the function checks if the file handle is already locked and if it is, it returns true. This is expected behavior. However it will work as you expect if multiple processes run in parallel, because every process will have a different file handle. If you want to test this in a single process, create multiple handles to the same file object:
$a = new Mutex();
$a->Initialize("file.lock");
$a->Lock(); // this will simply lock the file object
$b = new Mutex();
$b->Initialize("file.lock");
$b->Lock(); // this will block, because the file is locked by $a

Categories