Is there a simple way to find the file path to where a function is defined? I currently use dreamweavers FIND in an entire directory. Would be nice to have something that doesn't require downloading the entire site tho.
Any suggestions?
Personally I use an IDE like Netbeans or Eclipse PDT. In the case of Netbeans you can ctrl-click on a function and it'll take you to the definition. Sometimes there is a choice in which case it'll make you select one.
But its generally bad form to reuse a function name within your code in different files. It can lead to hard-to-find bugs because it's hard for any program to figure out exactly which one function is actually getting called since source files can be included dynamically.
Would be nice to have something that doesnt require downloading the entire site tho.
I hope this doesn't mean that you're modifying the site remotely.
Have a local working copy, make the changes, test them locally, then upload the changes.
A simple combo of vim and ctags makes the "go to definition" task a piece of cake.
You can't search for something (and expect to find it) unless you have a copy of all the files it might be in.
A number of IDEs have the ability to click and go from a use of a variable or function to its definition. If not that, then a multi-file searching tool within your editor, or something from a command line (such as ack) that is a little more specialised at searching source code can help. Good naming conventions can also help a lot for consistency.
It's not the question, but why don't you have a copy of the site locally - and while you are at it, keep it in version control as well?
I'd sure like this get_functionPath() ability and anyone that has extensively had to work on other people's code would probably find it incredibly useful. We have function_exists, if that could simply return the file the function is defined in for user defined functions it would save a TON of trouble. No, not all of us use IDEs, and yes some of us have been doing this long enough to code on the production machine. Test boxes and sandboxes are for rookies.
One trick is to purposely trigger an error in the function you are trying to locate. Can save a ton of time.
You'd need to use some kind of tool that could build an index on a remote filesystem that you could download and perform local lookup and search upon. I don't know of anything that can do this and a few moments with Google didn't turn up anything.
Maybe a good idea for an open source project? hinthint
so there is no function that would do this? Something like get_class() which would output the parent class but in the case the file path on the server...
Related
I saw many different questions here, but nothing was helpful to me.
I have no trouble with an interpreter, I tried to reset PhpStorm's cache.
It looks like file functions.php isn't accessible.
I really don't want to make a total reset. Maybe somebody has an idea how to solve it?
I'm not sure what I actually did and how to reproduce this issue again, but now it works well. I took previous version of PHPstorm. When I installed new one, the previous one was simply renamed to sth like 'phpstorm2'.
Here are my thoughts what actually happened:
As I understand for highlighting is responsible that part of application which is managed under Languages & Frameworks / PHP / PHP Runtime.
To reproduce this issue you may try to disable there "Core / Core" and try to write down in any place of your phpfile following:
\Exception::class();
And in your case this class will not be highlighted, as it presents in Core_c.php. In my case it is placed in
/opt/phpstorm/plugins/php/lib/php.jar!/stubs/Core/Core_c.php
I'm 100% sure that these libs were always enabled, but why I didn't saw this - that is the question.
So if I face this issue again my steps would be:
Try to verify Languages & Frameworks / PHP / PHP Runtime. The better way would be to enable ALL libs.
Check External Libraries in the project tree. Check read privileges for /opt/phpstorm/plugins/php/lib/php.jar and probably reinstall this plugin.
Try to find out function which I don't actually see in External Libraries.
This might be a silly question but it really annoys me. I began to program in Sublime Text 2 a short while ago, and really love it. One thing I just don't know how to set up is a way to include scripts that has to be included differently on the server.
On the server I have an include library, where I save all the "secure" files. This directory is placed outside of root, but using Apache, the PHP script can access the scripts simply by writing include "filename.php";. I really love this feature but it prevents me from receiving documentation and list over functions and variables. If I want to receive these informations, I have to include my classes/files like this: include "../path/filename.php". I could do this, but then it won't work on the server.
I know this is silly, but I really think it is to much work to comment out a path variable every time I have to upload, for test and then uncomment it again when writing code. I hope you understand what I am trying to achieve, and please tell me if there is an easy solution. I mentioned Sublime Text 2 because I know there is a lot og packages (plugins) and perhaps somebody have thought about a plugin that automatically checks every include/require command and if no path is defined, it checks whether or not it is in the local folder and again if not, it checks a ".settings" file for a custom path I manually have defined. That would be nice :D
http://php.net/manual/en/function.set-include-path.php set_include_path is what you need. YOu can set it either in php.ini or in php
I've been a research programmer (MATLAB) for most of my programming career, writing things for only myself that can be run on my own computer. Now, I'd like to be able to have people submit a comma-delimited text file and get processed text files in return without having to use my computer directly (only 1 MATLAB installment).
I'm thinking perhaps this can be done on my web server (XAMPP) over LAN and some programming language script that can be run on my server. This is what I'm thinking:
have people create comma-delimited text files.
have them go to a site I created on my localhost and submit it via a webpage forum.
have the uploaded file processed in PHP (small files, < 100KB). This involves looking up a MySQL database as well.
have people download the processed files somehow.
Is this a sound system? By "sound" I mean, if you, the expert, wanted to set up this system, would this be the steps and tools you would use? I've been learning PHP lately, and it seems like I could do this using PHP, but I'm not sure if this is the right tool for the task. The whole thing seems ... a bit on-the-fly, as in you upload the file, and things are done in PHP memory (from what I've read) instead of the file being stored on my server and the server running a script using that file (is there a difference?!). I would be greatly thankful if you guys could chime in and give me some pointers on how to do this properly (general ideas, not asking for codes).
PHP is most definitely a good tool for something like this. As meteorainer mentioned, PHP offers a pretty simple solution for most of what you need to do, and is much less complicated (in my opinion) than Java or .NET. I also believe it to be much easier to get started with.
As far as pointers go, a lot of what you need to accomplish can be found in the PHP manual itself, along with code samples. For example:
File uploads:
http://php.net/manual/en/features.file-upload.php
CSV Processing:
http://php.net/manual/en/function.fgetcsv.php
or, the method meteorainer mentioned
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.explode.php
MySQL Databases:
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/book.mysql.php
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.mysql-connect.php
Creating new files:
http://php.net/manual/en/function.fwrite.php
As far as whether or not this is a sound system, that all really depends on what this is going to be used for. I may be wrong, but it sounds like you just need a simple application for a very specific use. If this is the case, I would say it sounds just fine. You can always expand upon it later on if you choose to do so. Adding more security measures, more robust output, things like that. Either way, at the very least, your PHP implementation sounds like pretty good starting point to me.
Ya php can definitely do what you are looking for. You'll be using functions like:
$variablesArray = explode(file_get_contents('uploadedfile.csv'));
To bust open the CVS into a useful array and do some storage/math to that. PHP is definitely your bag.
You have other options, like java and asp, but imo java is far too complicated for what you get out of it, and asp requires a .net license and again, grants nothing over FREE php.
I checked "Settings > Prefences > Backup/Auto-Completion > Enable Auto-completion on each input" and "Function parameters hint on input" options. I have Notepad++ 5.9 (unicode) version. It auto completes function names but not their arguments. Also i tried re-install. I know it has this feature but not working. Any idea why?
I mean it auto completes print_r when i write "pri" but i want it to work like in the image;
http://i51.tinypic.com/3322auc.jpg
Hmm, this is not an answer to your question but I want to share it anyway.
I have used Notepad++ for years. I didn't like Eclipse and NetBeans is just so damn slow.
I never used the auto complete function for anything.
Notepad++ can't really do any code analysis, it can only give you auto-completion on the known PHP functions.
I've since switched to an IDE that does full code analysis and can do auto-completion for your own code as well.
Notepad++ is great if you just want to write something real quick. It's also a great tool if you want to learn about PHP since it doesn't do auto-completion very well ;) but if you really want to be productive when you're working on a large application I recommend you use an IDE that does code analysis. Productivity is the key here. I spend less time looking through files and more time actually writing code, which is great! :D
Good IDEs for PHP: NetBeans, PHPStorm, Eclipse.
For this feature to work, you need to supply an .xml file which contains the appropriate functions and parameters.
An example for Javascript with installation instructions can be found here.
I have not yet found xml files for PHP (or Python, which I'm looking for). But it seems this can work in npp, you just need to locate the right xml file.
Best of luck!
(Oh, and don't listen to the naysayers who are too quick to give up, npp works fine as an IDE.)
Notepad++ it's very good text editor, but it's not IDE.
Try to use IDE - NetBeans or PhpStorm, and you will get much more than just smart autocomplete.
I have a same question about this， function hint is Ok，but param hints not display until I download a new release of notepad++(a not install release), all is ok. before, I tryed many time, and edit the xml files.
If you will edit you own language, Can copy from a exist language xml ,for cpp.xml in plugins/APIs folder. It's easy to understand its rule.
It is very easy to have a error， if you config file is changed.
I've just inherited a project, and been told that an entire folder, "includes/" needs to be removed due to licensing issues -- We don't have the right to redistribute the files in that folder, so we need to cut our dependencies on them, and fix whatever breaks. I've been told "Less than 5% of the lines in that folder are ever even called by our program", but I have no way of verifying this.
There are about 50 files in the folder, each with a couple hundred lines of code. There is no unit testing currently in place. There's one master file, include.php, that require()s all 49 other files, so I can't just grep for any file doing import() on includes/.*.
This is about as much detail as I've really figured out at this point. I spent all last week reading through the files in the includes/ folder, and it won't be hard to rewrite any of this, but I'm having trouble deciding where to start. I tried deleting the folder and slowly fixing things that break, but I'm afraid that this route will cause me to miss some crucial functions in my rewrite.
Can anyone point me in a direction to get started? Are there tools that will simplify this process? I'm looking at xdebug right now, but I'm not sure exactly how I'd use it for this.
You may want to search for "php code coverage." That should help you figure out what code is used. For instance, this appears like it might help:
http://www.xdebug.org/docs/code_coverage
Your initial approach isn't bad at all. It's certainly a reasonable place to start:
delete that code that isn't allowed.
try to run what's left.
if things break: create a stub for a method that is now missing, and set it to return some sensible "default" value for now.
goto 2.
Then, itemize all the things that were missing, and make a sensible schedule to re-implement each thing.
I would start by grepping for files that reference include.php. Check through them if they're manageable, one by one. Then I'd grep for each of the functions in the /include/*php files. See if they're called anywhere, find 'em, replace 'em.
Because PHP is so dynamically typed, I don't think there's going to be a tool for this.
(Eagerly awaiting someone to prove me wrong because I have similar tasks all the time... )
See SD PHP Test Coverage Tool. It will provide a visual view of what code actually executes, as well as a report on what parts of files are used (including "no parts", which is your cue that
the code is a likely candidate to delete).
It doesn't require any hand-modifications of your code, or any unit tests to run it.
To answer my own question, I wound up using xdebug profiler to do the job, as I was initially investigating (after a friend's suggestion prompted me to take a second look).
In my /etc/php5/apache2/conf.d/xdebug.ini (on ubuntu 9.10), I set xdebug.profiler_enable=1 and xdebug.profiler_output_dir=/var/log/xdebug/, then loaded up the resulting cachegrind files with KCacheGrind and just ran a search on filenames for "includes/".
Now I have a mountain of work ahead of me to remove all this, but at least I've got a good overview of what I'll be modifying!