I'm using PHP to copy JPGs from a remote server to my own server. Is it best to simply use the copy() function, or are the jpeg-specific functions better? For example:
$copy = copy($remote_url, $dest_file);
-OR-
$img = imagecreatefromjpeg($remote_url);
$copy = imagejpeg($img, $dest_file);
imagedestroy($img);
What would the best option be in terms of speed and memory load? Also, would there be any difference in the resulting image quality? I should add that this script is required to copy a large number of photos (typically hundreds, but sometimes it may be a couple thousand).
Thanks, Brian
if all you want is a copy, copy() is better.
using the gd library functions (imagecreatefromjpeg/imagejpeg) will end up re-compressing the image (probably, maybe it's smart enough not to, but probably). If you wanted to convert the images to .png or something, then you'd want to use gd (or ImageMagick)
Related
I have a site with about 1500 JPEG images, and I want to compress them all. Going through the directories is not a problem, but I cannot seem to find a function that compresses a JPEG that is already on the server (I don't want to upload a new one), and replaces the old one.
Does PHP have a built in function for this? If not, how do I read the JPEG from the folder into the script?
Thanks.
you're not telling if you're using GD, so i assume this.
$img = imagecreatefromjpeg("myimage.jpg"); // load the image-to-be-saved
// 50 is quality; change from 0 (worst quality,smaller file) - 100 (best quality)
imagejpeg($img,"myimage_new.jpg",50);
unlink("myimage.jpg"); // remove the old image
I prefer using the IMagick extension for working with images. GD uses too much memory, especially for larger files. Here's a code snippet by Charles Hall in the PHP manual:
$img = new Imagick();
$img->readImage($src);
$img->setImageCompression(Imagick::COMPRESSION_JPEG);
$img->setImageCompressionQuality(90);
$img->stripImage();
$img->writeImage($dest);
$img->clean();
You will need to use the php gd library for that... Most servers have it installed by default. There are a lot of examples out there if you search for 'resize image php gd'.
For instance have a look at this page http://911-need-code-help.blogspot.nl/2008/10/resize-images-using-phpgd-library.html
The solution provided by vlzvl works well. However, using this solution, you can also overwrite an image by changing the order of the code.
$image = imagecreatefromjpeg("image.jpg");
unlink("image.jpg");
imagejpeg($image,"image.jpg",50);
This allows you to compress a pre-existing image and store it in the same location with the same filename.
I was doing some image editing with PHP, since GD provides less functionalities, I switched to Imagick.
One of the processes is to greyscale images. Everything went fine (locally on Windows 7, Imagick 2.2.1-dev 6.5.8-7 Q16) till I uploaded the script to my web hosting server (Linux, Imagick 3.0.1, 6.2.8, 2010-10-20, Q16).
I'v tried to change the quality, but it didn't improve anything.
$img->setImageCompression(imagick::COMPRESSION_JPEG);
$img->setImageCompressionQuality(100);
Here is the results from GD, Imagick and Photoshop
I believe something's wrong with version 3.0.1. Can someone please confirm that?
Q1: Is there an alternative way to convert an image to greyscale with Imagick?
Q2: Is it possible to convert a GD resource to Imagick? So I can use imagefilter($img, IMG_FILTER_GRAYSCALE); to get the correct result and then output with Imagick.
ps: For Q2, you might suggest me to just use GD to process the image. But the problem is that imagejpeg() cannot save images with resolution preserved. and that is actually the reason I switched to Imagick.
This is my preferred way to make a B&W photo in php/imagick: $im = $im->fxImage('intensity');
That applies a function to the image, where intensity is equal to 0.299*red+0.587*green+0.114*blue.
That formula is based on how our eyes are more sensitive to different colours, and as such the difference between that and a "flat" grayscale image really is night and day.
More details here:
http://php.net/manual/en/imagick.fximage.php
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/fx.php
function ImagickToGD($imagick){
$tmpfile = tmpfile();
$imagick->writeImage($tmpfile);
return imagecreatefromstring(file_get_contents($tmpfile));
}
Note that this function does not do any cleanup (except the temp file, which PHP cleans automatically).
So, for example, your code should look like:
$img = new Imagick();
// ...
$gd = ImagickToGD($img);
unset($img); // destroy imagick
imagefilter($gd, IMG_FILTER_GRAYSCALE);
imagejpeg($gd, $target_name, 100);
imagedestroy($gd);
Also, I did not understand the part about "preserving resolution". There is nothing in these operations relating to resolution. My guess is you meant compression? If you want full quality (ie, no compression) simply use 100 as compression value (as I did).
This results in maintaining the existing quality, since opening an image of 70% quality and saving it back with 70% quality actually decreases the final quality by 49% (70% of 70%).
function GDToImagickTo($gd){
$tmpfile = tmpfile();
imagepng($tmpfile); // Png is our best image deal:
// lossless compression, transparency etc..
$imagick = new Imagick()
$imagick->readImage($tmpfile);
return $imagick;
}
Refer this website and check out the image Magick operators found here www.rubblewebs.co.uk/imagemagick/
Also go with www.fmwconcepts.com/imagemagick/ you will find some examples out here...
You can use the image class what you prefer and then use the method readImageBlob to send it to the imagick http://www.php.net/manual/en/imagick.readimageblob.php
I'm working on a project where I upload an image (jpg) and manipulate it using the PHP GD library.
I know that I can use GD functions to edit an image resource (created from imagecreatefromjpeg()) but I was wondering if there was a way I could use the file uploaded in the $_FILES array directly with the GD library. One solution I thought of was saving the uploaded file, pushing it into imagecreatefromjpeg, then deleting it afterwards.
This seems cluinky though, is there a more efficient solution?
I'm still a bit new to PHP so I'm not sure as to how files are stored in the $_FILES array. I hope I'm making sense here. Thanks.
You can simply do this:
$img = imagecreatefromjpeg($_FILES['image']['tmp_name']);
// do gd operations on $img
imagejpeg($img, '/path/to/target');
You'll have to use imagecreatefrom in some form or another, and you can use it directly on the uploaded file. Then just save the result of your manipulations using imagejpeg. The uploaded file in tmp_name will we thrown away automatically.
Having said that, you should save the original somewhere. It's always good to have it around for later use.
i need display modyfied image , i have 2 option as i see it
to create temp image that is modified and then delete it
or to create the image on the fly and display it with passthru
for example :
$photo="foo.jpg";
$THUMB_SZ = 125;
$THUMB_PRESZ = $THUMB_SZ * 2;
$QUALITY = 87;
$convert = "/usr/bin/convert";
$command = "$convert -size $THUMB_PRESZ".'x'."$THUMB_PRESZ \"$photo\"" .
" -thumbnail $THUMB_SZ".'x'."$THUMB_SZ" .
" -unsharp 0.2x0.6+1.0" .
" -quality $QUALITY JPG:-";
header("Content-type: image/jpeg");
passthru($command, $retval);
and then in the html part <img src="foo.php">
If you need to create the image more than once, then I would suggest you create the file on disk, for two reasons
It saves creating it more than once.
With the correct caching headers, you can save transferring the data to the same client more than once as well.
If you really only need to show it once, ever, then you can do it using passthrough (or, if you're interested in performance, use the PHP Imagick bindings, it's faster, cleaner and safer than using imagick via the command line).
If you don't need to keep the modified image then using passthru saves a disk write and a delete. Your app is probably not that speed sensitive though.
If I really concern for performance, I would avoid the passthru choice. It would needlessly execute external command each time a user requested the image. If you use temp image, and changed the img src reference to the temp image, only the web server will retrieve the image and send it to the user, no PHP nor convert will be involved. Of course, I was assuming the image is changed not very often.
I have a site where users can upload images. I process these images directly and resize them into 5 additional formats using the CodeIgniter Image Manipulation class. I do this quite efficiently as follow:
I always resize from the previous format, instead of from the original
I resize using an image quality of 90% which about halves the file size of jpegs
The above way of doing things I implemented after advise I got from another question I asked. My test case is a 1.6MB JPEG in RGB mode with a high resolution of 3872 x 2592. For that image, which is kind of borderline case, the resize process in total takes about 2 secs, which is acceptable to me.
Now, only one challenge remains. I want the original file to be compressed using that 90% quality but without resizing it. The idea being that that file too will take half the file size. I figured I could simply resize it to its' current dimensions, but that doesn't seem to do anything to the file or its size. Here's my code, somewhat simplified:
$sourceimage = "test.jpg";
$resize_settings['image_library'] = 'gd2';
$resize_settings['source_image'] = $sourceimage;
$resize_settings['maintain_ratio'] = false;
$resize_settings['quality'] = '90%';
$this->load->library('image_lib', $resize_settings);
$resize_settings['width'] = $imagefile['width'];
$resize_settings['height'] = $imagefile['height'];
$resize_settings['new_image'] = $filename;
$this->image_lib->initialize($resize_settings);
$this->image_lib->resize();
The above code works fine for all formats except the original. I tried debugging into the CI class to see why nothing happens and I noticed that the script detects that the dimensions did not change. Next, it simply makes a copy of that file without processing it at all. I commented that piece of code to force it to resize but now still nothing happens.
Does anybody know how to compress an image (any image, not just jpegs) to 90% using the CI class without changing the dimensions?
I guess you could do something like this:
$original_size = getimagesize('/path/to/original.jpg');
And then set the following options like this:
$resize_settings['width'] = $original_size[0];
$resize_settings['height'] = $original_size[1];
Ok, so that doesn't work due to CI trying to be smart, the way I see it you've three possible options:
Rotate the Image by 360ยบ
Watermark the Image (with a 1x1 Transparent Image)
Do It Yourself
The DIY approach is really simple, I know you don't want to use "custom" functions but take a look:
ImageJPEG(ImageCreateFromString(file_get_contents('/path/to/original.jpg')), '/where/to/save/optimized.jpg', 90);
As you can see, it's even more simpler than using CI.
PS: The snippet above can open any type of image (GIF, PNG and JPEG) and it always saves the image as JPEG with 90% of quality, I believe this is what you're trying to archive.