Is this PHP code secure? - php

Just a quick question: is the following PHP code secure? Also is there anything you think I could or should add?
$post = $_GET['post'];
if(is_numeric($post))
{
$post = mysql_real_escape_string($post);
}
else
{
die("NAUGHTY NAUGHTY");
}
mysql_select_db("****", $*****);
$content = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM tbl_***** WHERE Id='" . $post . "'");

In this particular case, I guess the is_numeric saves you from SQL injections (although you would still be able to break the SQL statement, cf Alex' answer). However, I really think you should consider using parameterized queries (aka. prepared statements) because:
They will protect you even when using parameters of non-numeric types
You do not risk forgetting input sanitation as you add more parameters
Your code will be a lot easier to write and read
Here is an example (where $db is a PDO connection):
$stmt = $db->prepare('SELECT * FROM tbl_Persons WHERE Id = :id');
$stmt->execute(array(':id' => $_GET['post']));
$rows = $stmt->fetchAll();
For more information about parameterized SQL statements in PHP see:
Best way to stop SQL Injection in PHP

It's a little rough, but I don't immediately see anything that will cause you any serious problems. You should note that hexidecimal notation is accepted within is_numeric() according to the documentation. You may want to use is_int() or cast it. And for clarity, I would suggest using parameterized queries:
$sql = sprintf("SELECT col1
FROM tbl
WHERE col2 = '%s'", mysql_real_escape_string($post));
In this case, $post would be passed in as the value of %s.

is_numeric will return true for hexadecimal numbers such as '0xFF'.
EDIT: To get around this you can do something like:
sprintf('%d', mysql_real_escape_string($post, $conn));
//If $post is not an int, it will become 0 by sprintf
Look at the snippet here on php.net for more info.

You have the right idea but is_numeric() may not behave as you intended.
Try this test:
<?php
$tests = Array(
"42",
1337,
"1e4",
"not numeric",
Array(),
9.1
);
foreach($tests as $element)
{
if(is_numeric($element))
{
echo "'{$element}' is numeric", PHP_EOL;
}
else
{
echo "'{$element}' is NOT numeric", PHP_EOL;
}
}
?>
The result is:
'42' is numeric
'1337' is numeric
'1e4' is numeric
'not numeric' is NOT numeric
'Array' is NOT numeric
'9.1' is numeric
1e4 may not be something your sql server understands if you're looking for what is commonly referred to as a numeric value. From an SQL injection standpoint you're fine.

You're not passing the connection resource to mysql_real_escape_string() (but you seemingly do so with mysql_select_db()). The connection resource amongst other things stores the connection charset setting which might affect the behavior of real_escape_string().
Either don't pass the resource anywhere or (preferably) pass it always but don't make it even worse than not passing the resource by mixing both.
"Security" in my book also encompasses whether the code is readable, "comprehensible" and does "straight-forward" things. In the example you would at least have to explain to me why you have the !numeric -> die branch at all when you treat the id as a string in a SELECT query. My counter-argument (as the example stands; could be wrong in your context) would be "Why bother? The SELECT just will not return any record for a non-numeric id" which reduces the code to
if ( isset($_GET['post']) ) {
$query = sprintf(
"SELECT x,y,z FROM foo WHERE id='%s'",
mysql_real_escape_string($_GET['post'], $mysqlconn)
);
...
}
That automagically eliminates the trouble you might run into because is_numeric() doesn't behave as you expect (as explained in other answers).
edit: And there's something to be said about using die() to often/to early in production code. It's fine for test/example code but in a live system you almost always want to give control back to the surrounding code instead of just exiting (so your application can handle the error gracefully). During the development phase you might want to bail out early or put more tests in. In that case take a look at http://docs.php.net/assert.
Your example might qualify for an assertion. It won't break if the assertion is deactivated but it might give a developer more information about why it's not working as intended (by this other developer) when a non-numeric argument is passed. But you have to be careful about separating necessary tests from assertions; they are not silver bullets.
If you feel is_numeric() to be an essential test your function(?) might return false, throw an exception or something to signal the condition. But to me an early die() is the easy way out, a bit like a clueless opossum, "I have no idea what to do now. If i play dead maybe no one will notice" ;-)
Obligatory hint to prepared statements: http://docs.php.net/pdo.prepared-statements

I think it looks ok.
When accessing databases I always use query binding, this avoids problems if I forget to escape my strings.

Related

Am i safe from SQL injection if i know for sure that a certain value i am using in a dynamic statement is an integer?

Before i make my query, i check if the variable that is to be used in that query is an integer using this code: filter_var($_POST["user_id"], FILTER_VALIDATE_INT) !== false.
My question is, should i use PDO or do any escaping if the above function returns true only if my value is an integer (meaning that the value i am to use to build my query is safe) ? Is there any need to escape the value using prepared statements if my value has already passed the above test ?
I have not done any testing with the above nor am i really experienced in server-side technologies, so it is up to you PHP/security experts to guide me.
It's still a good idea to use prepared statements. Bind functions at this point are tried and true.
What if you or someone else screws up the filter?
Are you going to remember to use the right filter at every point in your code? This is a very easy thing to mismanage, and sometimes you may not be able to plan for every eventuality. Integers are relatively easy, but strings are far more complex.
In regards to your professional reputation, will other people see this code? If you had open source code (like github or something), and I was a hiring manager looking into your history, I would not hire you for breaking such a standard security practice like this.
Admittedly, point 3 is a little off topic, but I feel that it's worth mentioning.
This answer is an explanation of the shorthand type casting, from comments, as it's easier to read it as an answer than as a set of comments.
Your code:
filter_var($_POST["user_id"], FILTER_VALIDATE_INT) !== false.
This is a long winded way of ensuring that POSTed data is integer. It has issues, because POST data is always cast as a string.
$_POST["user_id"] = (int)$_POST["user_id"];
Is much easier to read and shorter to type, and this forces the data to be the integer type. This will competely solve your security risk if putting non-integer data into an integer placement in your SQL.
This utalises PHP Type Juggling which it is well worth reading up on.
While the above code will solve your security aspect, it will raise other overlap issues because any string can be casted to an integer, but the cast will return 0 if the string doesn't start with an integer value.
Example:
$string = "hello";
print (int)$string; // outputs 0;
$string = "27hello";
print (int)$string; // outputs 27;
$string = true;
print (int)$string; // outputs 1;
$string = "";
print (int)$string; // outputs 0;
So, overall I would suggest the following line to ensure your given POST value is a correct integer:
if (strcmp((int)$_POST['value'], $_POST['value']) == 0){
/// it's ok!
}
Please see this answer for further details as well as this PHP manual page.
maybe you need to see php bugs page this page before use FILTER_VALIDATE_INT

Short Solution for SQL Injection Attacks with MySQLI

I've gotten into the habit of writing the following sort of code:
$q = mysqli_query($mysqli,"SELECT * FROM table WHERE a='$a', b=$b;");
while ($row = mysqli_fetch_array($q)) {
// do something
}
Where $a is a string entered by the user (gotten through $_GET) and $b is a user-entered integer.
Obviously the code I have above is vulnerable to SQL injection attacks, so my habit is to rewrite it like this:
$q = mysqli_query($mysqli,"SELECT * FROM table WHERE a='".str_replace("'","",$a)."', b=".($b+0).";");
But this of course has problems if $a needs to have apostrophes (or quotation marks when quotation marks are used to mark the string).
Recently I learned about prepared statements in mysqli and started playing around with them. I wrote the following function to make it easier to make calls without having to change much of my code:
function safequery($a,$b,$c) {
global $mysqli;
$q = mysqli_prepare($mysqli,$a);
$e = "mysqli_stmt_bind_param(\$q,\$b";
$i = 0;
while ($i < count($c)) {
$e.=",";
$e.="\$c[$i]";
$i++;
}
$e.=");";
eval($e);
mysqli_stmt_execute($q);
return $q;
}
safequery("SELECT * FROM table WHERE a=? AND b=?;","si",array("unsafestring",37));
But what is returned from this function turns out not to be a mysqli_result and thus doesn't work with the first bit of code above. After some more research, I found an alternative, but it would require a complete rethink of how I write my code. Is this necessary or is it possible to protect against MySQL injection attacks with only small changes to the first bit of code (no new lines, same output style, etc.)?
I have looked around on StackOverflow and the rest of the web but I can't find a good simple solution; all of them require the edition of at least three more lines for every call and a different way of reading each row. I'd prefer to do this procedural-y...
Don't think half-measures are going to solve this problem. Commit to expunging all of the interpolation bugs from your code and be disciplined about using prepared statements. Your proposed fix only makes things worse, it gives you a false sense of security. It's also considerably more work than using prepared statements so I'm not sure why you'd even bother doing it this way.
One way to make this a lot easier to do is switch from using double quotes " to single quotes ' on your queries to disable interpolation. Any escaping errors become syntax problems, and if your editor highlights those you'll be able to spot them from across the room, and if something does by fluke work you'll be inserting harmless things like $a instead of actual data.
Another thing to consider is if you should be using an ORM like Doctrine or Propel given what you know about the sophistication of your application. These can make things considerably easier from an implementation perspective.
The code you have there is a ticking time bomb, get rid of it as soon as you can. Don't think replacing quotes is enough, that solves just one issue, there's actually a number of other methods your application can be vulnerable to injection bugs. Tools like SQLMap have an entire arsenal of things they can try to break your code and if you look at the list of things it can do if it finds a flaw you'll probably want to fix these problems right away.
One way you can find issues is using a tool like grep:
grep query `find -name '*.php'` | grep '\$'
That's not bulletproof, but it should probably turn up a lot of code you should fix right away.
Also as #ceejayoz suggests, purge that function with eval in it from your computer and never, ever do that again.
After talking with the commenters and looking at some of the other questions and things they linked to and suggested, I've rewritten the third code snippet to both solve the problem in question and fix the security holes that several commenters pointed out (if there are any remaining ones, please tell me).
First on my use of eval(). Though I can't see any immediate way it could cause problems (user strings are not executed as code in the eval()) it is certainly a round about and stupid way of solving my problem. #TadMan suggested call_user_func_array() which, once worked out, looks something like this:
function refValues($arr){
if (strnatcmp(phpversion(),'5.3') >= 0) //Reference is required for PHP 5.3+
{
$refs = array();
foreach($arr as $key => $value)
$refs[$key] = &$arr[$key];
return $refs;
}
return $arr;
}
function safequery($a,$b,$c) {
global $mysqli;
$q = mysqli_prepare($mysqli,$a);
call_user_func_array("mysqli_stmt_bind_param",refValues(array_merge(array($q,$b),$c)));
mysqli_stmt_execute($q);
return $q;
}
safequery("SELECT * FROM table WHERE a=? AND b=?;","si",array("unsafestring",37));
It turns out that mysqli_stmt_bind_param() takes only references, thus the new refValues() function (run into and solved before on StackOverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/a/16120923/5931472).
While this removes eval() and makes my code easier to understand, it still doesn't solve the original problem of returning the query response in a way that mysqli_fetch_array() can use. It turns out that the proper function to do this is mysqli_stmt_get_result() so the last line of safequery() is rewritten from:
return $q;
To:
return mysqli_stmt_get_result($q);
The result of safequery() is then a mysqli_result which can be used by mysqli_fetch_array().

Can anyone hack $id = (int) $_REQUEST['edit_id']; with SQL injection?

I have code that looks like:
$id = (int) $_REQUEST['edit_id'];
$result = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM dis WHERE dis_id = $id ");
Can anyone do SQL injection in this code like I am using (int) to filter the raw data? If so, how can it be hacked and how can the hack be prevented?
This on itself won't hurt and this specific case will not lead to SQL injection.
However, teach yourself to always use prepared statements, to train your muscle memory and not take "shortcuts".
There’s nothing wrong with it, assuming there’s no way way to break the int filter. However, things break all the time (in this case there’s little to worry about). But I agree with the previous answer: use prepared statements so sanitization/validation is built in.
I usually don’t trust a single layer of security when I can make sure my data is sanitized/validated with a line or 2. I made a trait that checks for expected input, and reuse it from project to project if I’m patching something without prepared statements.
I usually create a bunch of custom php sanitisation scripts for my applications to sanitise incoming data and run these against the data just for peace of mind. For example...
function SanitiseIntegerData($data) {
if ( preg_match("/[^\d]/", $data ) == TRUE ) { //If data contains characters apart from integers
echo("ERROR: Invalid GET data");
$_SESSION = array();
session_destroy();
session_unset();
echo "<script>window.location='index.php'</script>";
}else{
return $data;
}
}

Casting variables to integers in SQL queries in PHP

First of all, I am fully aware of SQL injection vulnerabilities and I am using PDO for newer applications that I am developing in PHP.
Long story short, the organization that I'm working for cannot afford to delegate any human resources at the moment to switch everything over to PDO for the rather large application that I'm currently working on, so I'm stuck with using mysql_* functions in the meantime.
Anyways, I am wondering if it is safe to use data validation functions to "sanitize" numeric parameters used in the interpolated queries. We do use mysql_real_escape_string() for strings (and yes I am aware of the limitations there too). Here is an example:
public function foo($id) {
$sql = "SELECT * FROM items WHERE item_id = $id";
$this->query($sql); // call mysql_query and does things with result
}
$id id a user-supplied value via HTTP GET so obviously this code is vulnerable. Would be OK if I did this?
public function foo($id) {
if (!ctype_digit($id)) {
throw new \InvalidArgumentException("ID must be numeric");
}
$sql = "SELECT * FROM items WHERE item_id = $id";
$this->query($sql); // call mysql_query and does things with result
}
As I'm aware, ctype_digit is the same as checking against a regular expression of \d+.
(There's also filter_var($id, FILTER_VALIDATE_INT), but that can potentially return int(0) which evaluates to FALSE under loosely-typed comparisons, so I'd have to do === FALSE there.)
Are there any problems with this temporary solution?
Update:
Variables do not only include primary keys, but any field with type boolean, tinyint, int, bigint, etc., which means that zero is a perfectly acceptable value to be searching for.
We are using PHP 5.3.2
Yes, if you indeed religiously use the correct function to validate the data and correctly prevent the query from running if the data is not as expected, there's no vulnerability I can see. ctype_digit has a very limited and clear purpose:
Returns TRUE if every character in the string text is a decimal digit, FALSE otherwise.
There's basically nothing that can go wrong with this function, so it's safe to use. It will even return false on an empty string (since PHP 5.1). Note that is_numeric would not be so trustworthy. I would possibly still add a range check to make sure the number is within an expected range, I'm not sure what could happen with overflowing integers. If you additionally cast to (int) after this check, there's no chance of injection.
Caveat emptor: as with all non-native parameterised queries, there's still a chance of injection if you're getting into any shenanigans with connection charsets. The range of bytes that may slip through are severely limited by ctype_digit, but you never know what one could come up with.
Yes, it will work. Your code will raise an exception if the value isn't a numeric string, you'll just have to catch that and display an error message to the user.
Beware that ctype_digit($foo):
Will return true if $foo is empty before PHP 5.1 (see the doc) ;
Will return false for all int values of $foo outside of the [48, 57] interval (ASCII numbers).
So you'll also need to check that $foo is a non-empty string if you plan on using ctype_digit($foo)
Long story short, the organization that I'm working for cannot afford to delegate any human resources at the moment to switch everything over to PDO
I don't see where is the problem here. According to the code you posted, you are already using some sort of DB wrapper, and already planning to alter the calling code for the every numeric parameter. Why not to alter that DB wrapper to make it support prepared statements, and alter calling code to employ it?
Old mysql ext is not a problem - one can emulate prepared statements with it all right.
I am fully aware of SQL injection vulnerabilities.
Your "full awareness" is a bit exaggerated. Unfortunately, most people do not understand the real source of injection, as well as the real purpose of the prepared statement.
That thing with separating data from the query is a nice trick, but totally unnecessary one. While the real value of prepared statement is its inevitability, as opposed to essential arbitrariness of the manual formatting.
Another your fault is separated treatment for the strings - it is partly formatted in the query (adding quotes) and partly - outside (escaping special characters) which again is a call disaster.
As you decided to stick to the manual formatting, then enjoy your injections, sooner or later. Your ideas are good for the artificial, fully controlled sandbox example. However, things turn different in the real life application, with many people working on it. Instead of asking a program to format your data, you are asking people to do that. With all the obvious consequences.
It makes me wonder why PHP users unable learn from their mistakes, and still eagerly devising practices, that has been proved unreliable long time ago.
Just spotted another fallacy in your reasoning
a user-supplied value via HTTP GET so obviously this code is vulnerable.
You have to understand that any unformatted value makes this code vulnerable, no matter if its HTTP GET, FTP PUT or file read. It is not only notorious "user input" have to be properly formatted but any input. This is why it is essential to make DB driver the only place where formatting occurs. It should be not a developer who formats the data but a program. Your idea contradicts with such a cornerstone principle.
Use mysql_real_escape_string and wrap your $id in single quote marks. The single quote marks ensures the safety and avoids the probability of SQL-injection.
For example, SELECT * FROM table WHERE id = 'escaped string' can't be hacked to something like: SELECT * FROM table WHERE id = 1; DROP table; as '1; DROP table;' will be considered the input argument for WHERE.
ctype_digit() will return false for most integer values of $id. If you want to use the function, cast it to string first:
public function foo($id) {
$id = (string)$id;
if (!ctype_digit($id)) {
throw new \InvalidArgumentException("ID must be numeric");
}
$sql = "SELECT * FROM items WHERE item_id = $id";
$this->query($sql); // call mysql_query and does things with result
}
This is because integer is interpreted as ASCII value.
I use intval() for simple cases although (int) apparently eats less resources. Example:
$sql =
"SELECT * FROM categories WHERE category_id = " .
intval($_POST['id']) .
" LIMIT 1";

IS multiplying by 1 a safe way to clean numeric values against sql injections?

I am wondering, If I have a value I know should be numeric, is multiplying it by 1 a safe method to clean it?
function x($p1){
$p1*=1;
sql="select * from t where id ={$p1}";
//run query..
}
Although my example uses an ID, this is being used for many types of numeric values I have in my app (can be money, can be pai etc).
I don't see why it wouldn't be. But what's wrong with using prepared statements? That's always going to be safer than using PHP variables directly in SQL statements.
You can use is_numeric()
I'm sure there is a more "appropriate" way, but for the scope of your question, I would say yes. If some sort of string is passed PHP will interpret it as a zero when doing the mathematical operation.
You can also use is_int()
While that'll probably work, intval seems like a better solution. http://php.net/manual/en/function.intval.php. Your intent will likely be more obvious to someone else reading your code.
If you want to check if a value is numeric before converting it to an int, use is_numeric ( http://php.net/manual/en/function.is-numeric.php ). It'll check for strings that are numeric as well as integers. For example, if a number was coming back from a text input form via AJAX, it might be a string. In that case, is_int would return false, but is_numeric would return true.
EDIT
Now that I know you use DECIMAL for the MySQL column type, you can do something like this:
function getItem($pValue)
{
if (!is_numeric($pValue))
{
return false;
}
$Query = sprintf
(
'SELECT * FROM %s WHERE %s = %.2f',
'TableName',
'Price',
$pValue
);
// Do something with $Query
}
It works most of the times as it will cast strings to integers or doubles, but you have to be careful. It's going to work correctly for scalar values. However, if you do this:
x(new stdClass);
You'll get an E_NOTICE. This is not so bad, right? This:
x(array());
And you'll get an E_ERROR, Unsupported operand types, and the script terminates.
Maybe you'd think that it isn't so bad, but a fatal error at an inopportune moment can leave your system in an unstable state, per example, by losing referential integrity or leaving a series of queries unfinished.
Only you knows if a case like the above can happen. But if this data comes from a user in any way, I'd go with Murphy's Law on this one and not trust it.

Categories