is it possible to do something like this in PHP 5.2.1?
abstract class Test
{
public function __construct()
{
if (function_exists('init')):
$this->init();
}
}
If i try this, the function on the subclass is not called?
You can use method_exists to see if an object has a method with a given name. However, this doesn't let you test what arguments the method takes. Since you're defining an abstract class, simply make the desired method an abstract method.
abstract class Test {
public function __construct() {
$this->init();
}
abstract protected function init();
}
Just be careful you don't call init more than once, and child classes invoke their parents' constructors.
"something like" WHAT exactly?
Anyway, your syntax is totally wrong...
public function __construct()
{
if (function_exists('init')
{
$this->init();
}
}
Related
Here is my example:
trait FileConfig {
public static function getPathForUploads() {
$paths = static::getPaths();
//etc.
}
abstract public static function getPaths(); //doesn't work. Error: "Static function SharedDefaultConfig::getPaths() should not be abstract"
abstract public function getPaths(); //OK
public static function getPaths() {} //OK
}
Class:
class AppConfig {
use FileConfig;
public static function getPaths() {
return array(...);
}
}
Call:
AppConfig::getPathForUploads();
It's nessessary to make it static and abstract (to force classes using FileConfig to implement getPaths).
I wonder how is it possible to implement method changing it's static property? Is it a good practice or there are better solutions? Will it one day become illegal?
Thank you
This is fixed in php 7, so the following code works:
<?php
error_reporting(-1);
trait FileConfig {
public static function getPathForUploads() {
echo static::getPaths();
}
abstract static function getPaths();
}
class AppConfig {
use FileConfig;
protected static function getPaths() {
return "hello world";
}
}
AppConfig::getPathForUploads();
http://sandbox.onlinephpfunctions.com/code/610f3140b056f3c3e8defb84e6b57ae61fbafbc9
But it does not actually check if the method in AppConfig is static or not during compilation. You will only get a warning when you try to call the non-static method statically: http://sandbox.onlinephpfunctions.com/code/1252f81af34f71e901994af2531104d70024a685
You do not need to make the method static to force classes using it to implement the method. You can simply use interfaces alongside.
trait FileUploadConfig {
public static function getPathForUploads() {
$paths = static::getPaths();
//etc.
}
}
The trait was left as is. I just took away the functions for the interface.
interface PathConfiguration {
public static function getPaths();
}
The interface forces the class to implement the function. I left the static in there to correspond with the trait's specification.
class AppConfig implements PathConfiguration {
use FileUploadConfig;
public static function getPaths() {
return [];
}
}
To force classes using FileConfig to implement getPaths it's not nessessary to make abstract function static. Static means that it belongs to the class that declared it. Make it protected static, add code from trait and then you could change behaviour by inheritance from your AppConfig class.
How can I initialize class' base class by return value in construct? Let's say I have this as a base class:
class Base
{
public function Foo()
{
}
private $_var;
}
I also have this one static method from another class, which returns Base class:
class MyStaticClass
{
public static function Get()
{
return new Base();
}
}
and now I derive from base class it here:
class Derived extends Base
{
public function __construct()
{
// Here, how can I initialize Base class with
// object MyStaticClass returns? Something like
parent = MyStaticClass::Get(); // This doesn't obviously work..
}
}
Is there any solution / workaround to this?
Though it seems like an uncommon way of doing it, you probably mean this:
class Derived extends Base
{
public function __construct()
{
parent::__construct(MyStaticClass::Get());
}
}
I have not found a way to directly do that, but if you are willing to let go of class, you can accomplish this with javascript-style OOP. See my answer on https://stackoverflow.com/a/10468793/1369091
I'm not really sure if what I am looking for has a name, so it has been a bit difficult for me to search for, so I apologise if what I am asking has already been answered here before.
The situation is that I have an abstract class which has, of course, many other classes which extend it.
The abstract method in the abstract class is called run() and all of the extending classes define this method.
My problem is that I want to call some common code after the run() method has been called, but I want to know if there is a better way to do this.
I could of course just paste my common code into each and every extending class's run() method, but if I do that then it would be a lot of work for me to make simple changes from that point onward.
I could also put my common code into a method in the parent class and then call if from the extending class's run() method with $this.
But my question is, is there a better way to do this, or do I have to either use the $this keyword or paste in the code into each class's?
Here is a small example of what I want to do with my current idea:
abstract class Parent_Class {
public abstract function run();
protected function common_code() {
// Common code here
}
}
class Child_Class {
public function run() {
// Code here
// I want some common code to run after the run method has been called
$this->common_code(); // Is this the best way to do it?
}
}
Or is it possible to somehow tell the class that when the run() method has been called to automatically run the common_code() method?
A far simpler way to do this would to simply have a third method which calls run() and then calls common_code(). Subclasses can then override run() all they want.
abstract class Parent_Class {
public abstract function run();
protected function common_code() {
// Common code here
}
protected function start() {
$this->run();
$this->common_code();
}
}
class Child_Class {
public function run() {
// Code here
}
}
Based on Bradley Forster answer, you can define the method as protected, so when it's called from outside the class, you can intercept the event with php magic __call metod because
__call() is triggered when invoking inaccessible methods in an object context.
and then you can execute that method from the __call function
class A {
public function __call($method, $args){
if(!method_exists($this, $method))
throw new Exception("Call to undefined method ".__CLASS__."::$method()");
echo "doing something BEFORE function 'run' execution\n";
$retval = call_user_func_array(array($this, $method), $args);
echo "doing something AFTER function 'run' execution\n";
return $retval;
}
protected function run() {
echo "function 'run' executed\n" ;
}
}
$a = new A;
$a->run();
The answer given by Amber is nice and simple. But requires you to put your data in run() but call start(). Here is an alternative that allows you to have your code $a->run() in all your scripts, and $a->run() with your common code, but encapsulated in a namespace.
File hooks.php
<?php
// File: hooks.php
namespace hook;
class processHooks {
public function __construct() { /* Fatal Error without constructor */ }
protected function processHooks($_c, $method, $args) {
/* Swap the next two callbacks to run your custom code after */
call_user_func_array("\hook\\{$_c}::{$method}", $args);
return call_user_func_array(array($_c,$method), $args);
}
}
class A {
public function foo() {
echo 'Doing code stuff BEFORE calling child function....<br>';
}
}
File regular_file.php
<?php
// File: regular_file.php
include "hooks.php";
class A extends \hook\processHooks {
/* All that is required is this function
* and the function with common code to be protected
*/
public function __call($method, $args) {
self::processHooks(__CLASS__, $method, $args);
}
protected function foo() {
echo 'Method is called....<br>';
}
}
$a = new A();
$a->foo();
This works beacause method foo of class A in regular_file.php is protected, so it's not callable outside the class, so calling it triggers PHP magic method __call
__call() is triggered when invoking inaccessible methods in an object context.
I am trying to create a simple MVC my personal use and I could really use an answer to this simple question
class theParent extends grandParent{
protected $hello = "Hello World";
public function __construct() {
parent::__construct();
}
public function route_to($where) {
call_user_func(array("Child", $where), $this);
}
}
class Child extends theParent {
public function __construct() {
parent::__construct();
}
public function index($var) {
echo $this->hello;
}
}
$x = new theParent();
$x->route_to('index');
Now Child::index() this throws a fatal error: Using $this when not in object context but if I were to use echo $var->hello, it works just fine.
I know I can use $var to access all properties in the parent, but I would rather use $this.
By writing call_user_func(array("Child", $where), $this) you are calling the method statically. But as your method isn't static you need some kind of object instance:
call_user_func(array(new Child, $where), $this);
Documentation on callback functions.
You don't have an instance of Child to call a non-static method upon when you're doing $x->route_to('index'); The way you're calling the method, without having made an instance first, is implied static.
There are two ways to correct it. Either make the Child class's methods static:
class Child extends theParent {
public function __construct() {
parent::__construct();
}
static public function index($var) {
echo self::$hello;
}
}
...or make an instance of the child class for the parent to use:
class theParent extends grandParent{
protected $hello = "Hello World";
private $child = false
public function __construct() {
parent::__construct();
}
public function route_to($where) {
if ($this->child == false)
$this->child = new Child();
call_user_func(array($this->child, $where), $this);
}
}
Of course, both of these samples are rather generic and useless, but you see the concept at hand.
$this gives you access to everything visible/accessible in the current object. That can either be in the class itself (this) or any of it's parents public or protected members/functions.
In case the current class overrides something of a parent class, you can access the parent method explicitly using the parent keyword/label, whereas you add :: to it regardless if it is not a static method.
Protected variables exist only once, so you can not use parent to access them.
Is this info of use?
abstract class base {
abstract public function test();
public function run()
{
self::test();
}
}
class son extends base {
public function test()
{
echo 1;
}
}
son::run();
It reports:
Fatal error: Cannot call abstract
method base::test()
But son::test() works,why and is there a way to fix?
"self" is lexically scoped, that is, if you use "self" in a method of Base, "self" means "Base", no matter how you call this method at run time. php5.3 introduced a new kind of dynamic binding, which, ironically enough, is called "static". The following works as expected in php 5.3
abstract class base {
abstract public static function test();
static public function run()
{
static::test();
}
}
class son extends base {
static public function test()
{
echo 1;
}
}
son::run();
Of course:
Fatal error: Cannot call abstract method base::test()
It has no method body you could call. If run() is supposed to be a Template Method, you refer to the class scope with $this instead of self and then create an instance of $son to call run() on it, e.g.
abstract class BaseClass {
abstract public function test();
public function run()
{
$this->test();
}
}
class Son extends BaseClass {
public function test()
{
echo 1;
}
}
$son = new Son;
$son->run(); // 1
which is rather odd, because then you could have just as well called test() directly.
Also note that in your example
son::run();
is wrong, because the run() method is not declared static and while PHP will execute run() nonetheless, it is considered wrong usage and will raise an E_STRICT error. However, if you were to define run() static, you could no longer reference $this, because a static method is not invoked from instance scope, but class scope.
Edit I was about to add the PHP5.3 solution, but see that #erenon already did that, while I was typing, so I only add the appropriate reference in the PHP Manual on Late Static Binding.
Abstract methods do not have an implementation, and thus cannot be called. If the method is not defined as abstract, and actually has an implementation, then it can be executed by your code. For example:
public function test(){
echo "Hello from base!";
}
Factory/singleton pattern mix:
class Base
{
static private $instance;
static function getSon() {
if (null === self::$instance) {
self::$instance = new Son;();
}
return self::$instance;
}
}
class Son
{
public function test() {
echo 1;
}
}
Base::getSon()->test(); //1