CodeIgniter: Where should a particular functionality go? - php

Here is a quick overview of the controllers functionality in most of the application:
controller loads a specific model, gets data from it, formats the data and passes the formatted data to the view.
Now there is a search page, which needs to do a search query over entire database (all models). It needs to show each type of data in its particular formatted output on a single page as a list.
The problem:
The search controller can do the search, dynamically load model for each record type, and get the data from model. Problem comes when the data needs to be formatted. I am trying to load the specific controller from the search controller, which is causing problems.
What to do?
PS: I tried using the 'Wick' library, but it fails when the controller's format function tries to use its own model and session object, giving errors about call to a member on a non-object.

After much refactoring and trial/error, It appears that the best way to achieve the above is this way:
Keep the format function in the base controller from which all other controllers are derived. The format options are passed to the function along with the data object as arguments.
Make a static function in each derived controller, which returns the formatting options of the data.
Inside the search controller (which is itself derived from the base controller), for each data object, call the static function of its particular controller which returns the data formatting options, then use that to format the object for the view.
I guess I can say I will stick to using the model only for interaction with the database, and let everything else be done by controller. If anyone has a better solution still, I am all ears.

It sounds like you want to use the Factory design pattern
Make this a library:
class MyModelFactory {
static public function Factory($data) {
$type = key($data);
return new $type($data);
}
}
now, in your controller, you can do something like this:
$model = MyModelFactory::Factory(array($_REQUEST['model'] => $_REQUEST));
and now you have an object of whatever model was specified in $_REQUEST['model']. Be sure to take any security precautions you may need for your application to assure the user has permissions to use the model that they request
Now, since you want to be using common methods and stuff, your models should probably be based off an abstract class / interface.. so instead of
class MyModelOne extends Model {
// stuff
}
You probably want something like this, to ensure your required methods will always be available:
abstract class MyAbstractModel extends Model {
protected $search_params;
public function __construct($data = array()) {
$search_params = $data['search_params'];
}
protected function GetSearchParameters() {
return $this->search_params;
}
abstract public function GetData();
abstract public function GetColumns();
abstract public function DefineViewOptions();
}
class MyModelOne extends MyAbstractModel {
public function GetData() {
$params = array();
$params[] = $this->db->escape_str($this->GetSearchParameters());
// return whatever data you want, given the search parameter(s)
}
public function GetColumns() {
// return some columns
}
public function DefineViewOptions() {
// return some configuration options
}
}

In general you can't load another controller from within a controller in CodeIgniter (although there are mods that allow you to do something like this).
I would try creating a class for formatting your data and add it to the application/library folder. Then load, use and re-use this class throughout your various controllers.
Here is a page from the CodeIgniter documentation Creating Your Own Libraries that explains the details and conventions.
Also, if a class is overkill, creating helper functions is an even lighter approach.
The difference between libraries and helpers in CodeIgniter is that libraries are classes, helpers are just a group of php functions.
Once you have formatted your data, you can load any view from any controller, so you should still have all the re-usability you need so you DRY (don't repeat yourself)

There are a few simple approaches based on the principle of what's simpler (versus what's perfectly DRY). Here's one alternative approach I use with CodeIgniter:
Instead of trying to load multiple controllers, reuse the view fragments from your search controller (or search route, depending which you're using). This requires using the same naming conventions for your data elements so the views are interchangeable, but you should be doing this anyway.
Instead of using multiple models for search, add a single Search model that knows about the things that can be searched on. If you want to prevent duplicate SQL, reuse the SQL between models (this can be done using constants, or loading SQL from disk).
Controllers are not great candidates for reuse from your own PHP code: they route actions and requests for resources to the things themselves. They are intended to be called via HTTP, using the URI interface you've come up with. Calling them from code is a coupling you want to avoid. That said, reusing controllers from JavaScript (or via cURL) is a great, decoupled way to reuse things in any web framework.

Related

PHP MVC - Model needs to access data from another model

I have built a small PHP MVC framework and just want to clarify the best way to get data from one model into another. For example:
I have a Users_model that contains a method called get_users().
I also have Communications_model that needs to get specific or all user data and as such needs to access the get_users() method from the Users_model.
Is it best practice to:
a) Instantiate the Users_model in a controller and pass the data from the get_users() method into the Communications_model?
b) Instantiate the Users_model inside the Communications_model and run get_users() from there, so it can be accessed directly?
c) Another way?
Many thanks for any help.
It depends of your motive behind this.
If you want effect on result, then using well know library, like Doctrine etc. should be your choice.
If you want to learn design patterns, then you should get read about ActiveRecord or DataMapper + Repository patterns. Then implements both and check out.
If you want your code, this way - ORM should represent relations of data, then you should ask what it more important? If you menage communication (bus, train), then user can be there assigned and getting users from communication is OK. If user have communication (like car), then relation is reversed.
All depends, what is you motive behind this. Using library, like Doctrine, could you help you running you application. If you want learn design patterns, then check out both options to get some experience.
What you call "users model" is a repository. And what you call "communication model" looks like a service.
Your communication service should have the user repository passed in constructor as a dependency.
I honestly think, that a huge part of your confusion is that you try to call all of those things "models". Those classes are not part of the same layer. You migth find this answer to be useful.
All are possible ways but what I usually do is, whenever there is any function that I think would be reused a number of times by a number of objects, I declare it as static.
It would save the effort of playing with object declaration and would be easily accessible by ClassName::function();
Again, it's a design choice, usually objects are declared right there in the controller and used as per the need but just to save declaration of objects again and again I follow the approach of declaring function static.
The simple principle here is using the __construct() (constructor) to build the object with the relevant properties from the Database. The User Model will have a static function (therefore accessible through any scope) to create an array of instanced objects by simply passing the model data through a new self() which returns the instance.
The concept is you end up with an array of User_Model instances each being a build of the Database columns to properties. All that's left is to create the Database Model and the functions to retrieve the columns and data.
class Communications_Model {
private $_all_users;
public function getUsers() {
$this->_all_users = Users_Model::loadAllUsers();
}
}
class Users_Model {
private $_example_property;
public function __construct($user_id) {
$data = SomeDatabaseModel::getConnection()->loadUserFromDatabase((int)$user_id);
$this->_example_property = $data['example_column'];
}
public static function loadAllUsers() {
$users = array();
foreach(SomeDataModel::getConnection()->loadAllUsers() as $data) {
$users[] = new self($data['user_id']);
}
return $users;
}
}
Of course, now, you have a $_all_users; property that has an array of instanced User Models containing the data.

In Magento what is the correct data flow from POST to controller to model to block to template?

When data is sent to a Magento extension via GET or POST, what is the correct way to use the MVC to validate the data, process it based on some business logic then output the results to the screen?
As I understand it, the controller is the correct place to receive and validate the data being submitted (perhaps calling on a model to do the actual validating). Models are the correct place for any business logic, taking the request parameters and processing them. The block is the correct place to prepare data for output, which it can request from a model.
I understand how a controller can receive posted data and forward it to a model
class Company_Project_IndexController extends Mage_Core_Controller_Front_Action
{
public function receivePostedData()
{
$model = Mage::getModel('project/somemodel');
if($model->validateData( $this->getRequest()->getPost('post_vars') )) {
$model->processData( $this->getRequest()->getPost('post_vars') );
}
}
}
which the model will then process
class Company_Project_Model_Somemodel extends Mage_Core_Model_Abstract
{
public function validate( $data )
{
//return true of false if data is valid/invalid
}
public function processData( $data )
{
//Do something with the data
}
public function getData()
{
//return something
}
}
I also understand how a block can instantiate a model and get data from it
class Company_Project_Block_Display extends Mage_Core_Block_Template
{
public function getData()
{
$model = Mage::getModel('project/somemodel');
return $model->getData();
}
}
The problem I have is the disconnect between the controller and the model working together and the Block and the model working together. If the controller is pushing data into the model which is changing the models state, how do I then get data into the block from the model based on that changed state?
As I see it, there are the following possible solutions:
Use Mage::getSingleton to get my model so I'm referring to the same instance in the controller and the block
Refer to the post data directly inside the model or the block
Use the registry to store some of the model state
I've know idea if any of the above are correct or which one I should be using.
I've taken a look at the core Catalogue Search module as its doing exactly what I need, but I got completely lost in the code.
I know that several other very similar questions to this have been asked and answered but I'm still in the dark.
It's a good question, but there isn't one clear answer. If you look at the Magento core itself, you'll see a variety of methods used. All that said, here's some general advice/context for the tradeoffs involved.
Based on usage, Magento's controller action methods are not designed to interact with The View (or as it's known in Magento, The Layout). Instead, a controller action is meant as the main entry point for a specific URL, which should then interact with the request and do stuff with models. When that's done, the controller action then tells the layout to render with a calls to
$this->loadLayout();
$this->renderLayout();
As designed (and this is just an opinion) The Layout is completely decoupled from the rest of the system. CodeIgniter/Kohana style systems feature "dumb views", which take variables from the controller action and do a simple template replacement on them. The Magento Layout, on the other hand, is a collection of nested block objects, and block object methods are meant to query the models directly when they need information.
For example — take a look at the Mage_Adminhtml_Block_Catalog_Product_Attribute_Set_Main_Formset block
#File: app/code/core/Mage/Adminhtml/Block/Catalog/Product/Attribute/Set/Main/Formset.php
protected function _prepareForm()
{
$data = Mage::getModel('eav/entity_attribute_set')
->load($this->getRequest()->getParam('id'));
//...
}
The idea here is, irrespective of what happens in the controller action, the Mage_Adminhtml_Block_Catalog_Product_Attribute_Set_Main_Formset block will always grab the latest eav/entity_attribute_set model information when it renders (accessing the request object to get the request/post data, as you mentioned above). The controller action and the view are decoupled from one another.
As designed, the is The Right way to use the system. Unfortunately, it's also ineffective from a performance standpoint. For developers coming form other systems, the idea that view rendering kicks off another round of SQL queries seems crazy. Magento's famous "start shooting and let the caching layer" sort it out approach met with mixed results.
One remedy for this potential performance problems is where stashing already instantiated models in the registry comes into play. You can see an example of this in the admin console's product editing controller
#File: app/code/core/Mage/Adminhtml/controllers/Catalog/ProductController.php
protected function _initProduct()
{
//...
Mage::register('current_product', $product);
//...
}
and then its use in many of the resulting blocks which render the editing form for products
app/code/core/Mage/Adminhtml/Block/Catalog/Product/Edit/Js.php
public function getProduct()
{
return Mage::registry('current_product');
}
The trade-off here is better SQL performance (no extra queries for the blocks), but you've essentially tied these blocks to a controller action which defines a current_product registry entry. The Magento registry is (in essence) a fancy way of doing global variables, so you have most of the problems inherent with globals. As you noted, you can achieve similar results with the getSingleton method — but that may not be appropriate depending on the task you're trying to accomplish.
For what it's worth, the registry/singleton method appears to be favored by the core developers for both the admin console application (the Mage_Adminhtml module) and the Magento Mobile controllers (the Mage_XmlConnect module), while the more paranoid "load the model explicitly" pattern is used more in the front-end cart application. Whether this is a coincidence, a conscious choice, or just the core team itself learning as it went along is probably one of those unanswerable questions.
Finally, one technique that's not used much by the core code, but that I sort of like when I'm looking for more of a "dumb view" behavior, is this. After you load the layout, but before you render it, you're able to access specific blocks by name. This, combined with the power of magic getters and setters, lets you do something like this
$this->loadLayout();
$content = $this->getLayout()->getBlock('content');
if($content)
{
$content->setSomeValue('Hello World');
}
$this->renderLayout();
and then from your block's template, you can grab the variable with
echo $this->getSomeValue();
You're still tying your block's implementation to your controller action but doing so in a less global-ish way. Also, the decoupled layout may not contain the block you're looking for, so you'll want to be careful with this.

What to do about those page specific little classes that don't seem to fit as Models or Libraries in CodeIgniter?

In my current implementation of the MVC design pattern (demonstrated using PHP and CodeIgniter):
Let's say I have a "page" located at "www.mysite.com/blue/page" that is ultimately generated by the following (greatly simplified) files:
/libraries
session_lib.php
/controllers
/red
/white
/blue
page.php
/models
/red
/white
/blue
funky_class.php
page_model.php
/views
/red
/white
/blue
page.php
And here's an easy to understand controller:
// FILE: /controllers/blue/page.php
// Get some paramaters from URL
$params = $this->input->get();
// Use a library to do some stuff with these params with a session
$this->load->library('session_lib');
$this->session_lib->store_in_session($params);
// Use a very page specific class to do some funky stuff with the params
$this->load->model('blue/funky_class');
$funkified_params = $this->funky_class->funkify($params);
// Pass params to a model
$this->load->model('blue/page_model');
$data['output_from_db'] = $this->page_model->get_some_output_from_db($funkified_params);
// Send to view
$this->load->view('blue/page', $data);
And now the question...
What is the best procedure for these "funky" little page specific classes that don't interact with the database? In this example I store the little class with the models, and in some cases might just add additional methods inside the model class to do the funky stuff. Is this good practice? Or should the library and funky class both go inside the model so the controller is even skinnier (however the model might be used in other places without the need for sessions and funkiness)?
I would use a helper.
When a helper is loaded, that function will be available in the global scope so you can call it anywhere.
They're great for small, stand-alone functions that do only one thing that is not necessarily related to code in a model or library
Helpers especially excel for me when converting things between one format or another (slugify, convert_timezone, change_query_string) or doing little tasks that you don't want to think about (force_ssl, is_image, uri_string)
funkify() seems like an appropriate helper function that may prevent a lot of repeated code.
Here's the codeigniter documentation page on them: http://ellislab.com/codeigniter/user-guide/general/helpers.html
If you're in a situation where the helper function is so specific it will be only used in one place, you can still use a helper. Name the helper after your controller, page_helper.php for example.
page_helper.php
function funkify($params) {
// do funky stuff
return $funky_params;
}
then in your controller:
class Page extends CI_Controller {
public function __construct() {
parent::__construct();
$this->load->helper('page');
}
public function page() {
// do stuff
$funky_params = funkify($params);
// do more stuff
$this->load->view('blue/page', $data);
}
I have no excuse for it, but sometimes if I am in a situation where I need a razor specific function that will only be used on one location (say, a controller) ever, I will put it right in the controller's file. You can paste a function outside of the class definition and it will act like a helper and be available globally (as long as that controller is loaded). You can also define functions inside of a view. Yucky, but possible. I don't like to do it often because it's unusual and not expected (by myself or other developers)

MVC - Can I call more than one (or multiple) controller in class controller?

For projects written in php, can I call more than one (or multiple) controller in class controller? Example in http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/7538/mvc03.gif
ASK: I need to call an action from another controller... And if I do like the picture above, I'm being out-ethics?
Thanks,
Vinicius.
I'm sure that you can do what you want with whichever framework you're using. If you can't do it natively for whatever reason, then you can extend your framework as required.
Having said that, I personally don't like the idea of a controller calling another controller. It seems to somewhat break the MVC paradigm if only from a theoretical standpoint. What I might do instead is build a library class that contains the functionality required and then have both controllers instantiate that class as a member and call the functions required.
For example, using CodeIgniter:
libraries/MyLib.php:
class MyLib
{
public function MyFunc()
{ /* do whatever */ }
}
controllers/ControllerA.php:
class ControllerA extends Controller
{
public function index()
{
$this->load->library('MyLib');
$this->mylib->MyFunc();
}
}
controllers/ControllerB:
class ControllerB extends Controller
{
public function index()
{
$this->load->library('MyLib');
$this->mylib->MyFunc();
}
}
out-ethics? Anywhose... back to reality.
Yes, a controller can call another controller's action. For instance, in cakePHP, this functionality is afforded via requestAction
// pass uri to request action and receive vars back
$ot3 = $this->requestAction('/stories/xenu');
If you're rolling your own, the details of how to implement it will be very specific to your framework.
then you need to modify framework, find place where controller is lounched and add there your second controller.
what framework you are using?
You can do it any way that you want. You don't have to use MVC if you don't want to. However, in MVC you really should only have one controller active at a time. You probably want multiple Views or Models, not another Controller. There is nothing at all wrong in loading, say, a header and footer view for the menu and footer of the site.
If you are building another Controller, then feel that you need to access the functionality of a previous Controller to access its functionality (because it works with a specific / desired Model), then the Model you developed for the latter probably needs to be refactored. IN plain speak, your target Model may be doing too much. Break it up.
You are trying to avoid repeating yourself (DRY) by using calling the methods of a Controller that has already been developed, but in doing so your are creating TIGHT coupling between both controllers! If something changes in the borrowed controller, it will have an effect on the borrowing controller. Not good, Dr. Jones.

Passing data from MVC Controller to View in PHP

I have my own hand-rolled PHP MVC framework for some projects that I'm working on. When I first created the framework, it was in the context of building an admin CMS. Therefore, there was a very nice one-to-one relationship between model, view, and controller. You have a single row in the DB, which maps to a single model. The controller loads the model and passes it to the view to be rendered (such as into an edit form). Nice, clean, and easy.
However, now that I'm working on the front end of the site, things are getting sticky. A page isn't always a view of a single model. It might be a user directory listing with 20 users (each a User model). Furthermore, there might be metadata about the request, such as pagination (current page, total pages, number of results) and/or a search query.
My question is, what is the cleanest way to pass all this data to the view?
Some options I'm considering:
Have the controller create an array and pass that to the view as a single parameter:
class UserController{
public function renderView(){
// assume there's some logic to create models, get pagination, etc.
$data = array()
$data['models'] = $models;
$data['currentPage'] = $current;
$data['totalPages'] = $total;
return $view->render($data);
}
}
class UserView{
public function render($data){
// render the data
}
}
Create properties in the view class and have the controller populate them:
class UserView{
public $models;
public $currentPage;
public $totalPages;
}
class UserController{
public function renderView(){
// assume there's some logic to create models, get pagination, etc.
$view = new UserView();
$view->models = $models;
$view->currentPage = $current;
$view->totalPages = $total;
return $view->render();
}
}
Give the view some sort of generic HashMap or Collection object as a container which can hold any arbitrary number and name of data.
class UserView{
public $collection = new Collection(); // works like a Java collection
}
class UserController{
public function renderView(){
// assume there's some logic to create models, get pagination, etc.
$view = new UserView();
$view->collection->add($models,'models');
$view->collection->add($currentPage,'currentPage');
return $view->render();
}
}
I know that technically any of the could work, but I'm unsure of the best choice, or if there's a better or more conventional choice that I'm missing.
I'm going to recommend the concept of Fat Models, Skinny Controllers (or, Fat Models Thin Controllers if you prefer...)
In otherwords, your model is too strict - tying your model to represent only something like a RowDataGateway is extremely limiting.
In fact, I think good models hide the fact that you're reading the data from a database at all. Because, in reality, your data could be in text files, or from a web service, or whatever. If you treat your Model like nothing more than a glorified DBAL, you doom yourself to having tightly-coupled code in your controllers that just won't let you break away from the "data only comes from the database" way of thinking.
I've seen both of the first two methods implemented in popular MVC/templating frameworks.
django uses the first method, passing to the view a dictionary of variables which the view uses to fill the template.
smarty uses the second method, creating a Smarty object and assigning values to each the properties in the container.
Your third method seems to essentially be the same as the second, with minor architecture differences.
Really, I guess I haven't said anything that you haven't thought of already. Basically, these are all sounds ideas, so implement whatever you feel you are most comfortable with.
In the one I use, it has automatically has a view property in the controller that you can access methods and properties on the view. All public properties are then accessible within the view view '$this' since the view is rendered in it's own objects context.
In the controller:
$this->view->myVar = 'test';
And in the view:
$this->myVar; // 'test'
The same goes for the layout since the are both separate instances of the same view object:
$this->layout->myVar = 'test';
And then in the layout:
$this->myVar; // 'test'
The framework used to be proprietary, but is about to be released to the general public. I'd be happy to send you some code from it if you think that'd help. Remember, the simplest answer is usually the best answer.

Categories