I'm sure this is an extremely obvious question, and that there's a function that does exactly this, but I can't seem to find it. In PHP, I'd like to know if my array has duplicates in it, as efficiently as possible. I don't want to remove them like array_unique does, and I don't particularly want to run array_unique and compare it to the original array to see if they're the same, as this seems very inefficient. As far as performance is concerned, the "expected condition" is that the array has no duplicates.
I'd just like to be able to do something like
if (no_dupes($array))
// this deals with arrays without duplicates
else
// this deals with arrays with duplicates
Is there any obvious function I'm not thinking of?
How to detect duplicate values in PHP array?
has the right title, and is a very similar question, however if you actually read the question, he's looking for array_count_values.
I know you are not after array_unique(). However, you will not find a magical obvious function nor will writing one be faster than making use of the native functions.
I propose:
function array_has_dupes($array) {
// streamline per #Felix
return count($array) !== count(array_unique($array));
}
Adjust the second parameter of array_unique() to meet your comparison needs.
Performance-Optimized Solution
If you care about performance and micro-optimizations, check this one-liner:
function no_dupes(array $input_array) {
return count($input_array) === count(array_flip($input_array));
}
Description:
Function compares number of array elements in $input_array with array_flip'ed elements. Values become keys and guess what - keys must be unique in associative arrays so not unique values are lost and final number of elements is lower than original.
Warning:
As noted in the manual, array keys can be only type of int or string so this is what you must have in original array values to compare, otherwise PHP will start casting with unexpected results. See https://3v4l.org/7bRXI for an example of this fringe-case failure mode.
Proof for an array with 10 million records:
The top-voted solution by Jason McCreary: 14.187316179276s ππππππππππππππ
The accepted solution by Mike Sherov: 2.0736091136932s ππ
This answer's solution: 0.14155888557434s π/10
Test case:
<?php
$elements = array_merge(range(1,10000000),[1]);
$time = microtime(true);
accepted_solution($elements);
echo 'Accepted solution: ', (microtime(true) - $time), 's', PHP_EOL;
$time = microtime(true);
most_voted_solution($elements);
echo 'Most voted solution: ', (microtime(true) - $time), 's', PHP_EOL;
$time = microtime(true);
this_answer_solution($elements);
echo 'This answer solution: ', (microtime(true) - $time), 's', PHP_EOL;
function accepted_solution($array){
$dupe_array = array();
foreach($array as $val){
// sorry, but I had to add below line to remove millions of notices
if(!isset($dupe_array[$val])){$dupe_array[$val]=0;}
if(++$dupe_array[$val] > 1){
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
function most_voted_solution($array) {
return count($array) !== count(array_unique($array));
}
function this_answer_solution(array $input_array) {
return count($input_array) === count(array_flip($input_array));
}
Notice that accepted solution might be faster in certain condition when not unique values are near the beginning of huge array.
You can do:
function has_dupes($array) {
$dupe_array = array();
foreach ($array as $val) {
if (++$dupe_array[$val] > 1) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
$hasDuplicates = count($array) > count(array_unique($array));
Will be true if duplicates, or false if no duplicates.
Here's my take on this⦠after some benchmarking, I found this to be the fastest method for this.
function has_duplicates( $array ) {
return count( array_keys( array_flip( $array ) ) ) !== count( $array );
}
β¦or depending on circumstances this could be marginally faster.
function has_duplicates( $array ) {
$array = array_count_values( $array );
rsort( $array );
return $array[0] > 1;
}
$duplicate = false;
if(count(array) != count(array_unique(array))){
$duplicate = true;
}
Keep it simple, silly! ;)
Simple OR logic...
function checkDuplicatesInArray($array){
$duplicates=FALSE;
foreach($array as $k=>$i){
if(!isset($value_{$i})){
$value_{$i}=TRUE;
}
else{
$duplicates|=TRUE;
}
}
return ($duplicates);
}
Regards!
To remove all the empty values from the comparison you can add array_diff()
if (count(array_unique(array_diff($array,array("")))) < count(array_diff($array,array(""))))
Reference taken from #AndreKR answer from here
Two ways to do it efficiently that I can think of:
inserting all the values into some sort of hashtable and checking whether the value you're inserting is already in it(expected O(n) time and O(n) space)
sorting the array and then checking whether adjacent cells are equal( O(nlogn) time and O(1) or O(n) space depending on the sorting algorithm)
stormdrain's solution would probably be O(n^2), as would any solution which involves scanning the array for each element searching for a duplicate
Find this useful solution
function get_duplicates( $array ) {
return array_unique( array_diff_assoc( $array, array_unique( $array ) ) );
}
After that count result if greater than 0 than duplicates else unique.
I'm using this:
if(count($array)==count(array_count_values($array))){
echo("all values are unique");
}else{
echo("there's dupe values");
}
I don't know if it's the fastest but works pretty good so far
One more solution from me, this is related to performance improvement
$array_count_values = array_count_values($array);
if(is_array($array_count_values) && count($array_count_values)>0)
{
foreach ($array_count_values as $key => $value)
{
if($value>1)
{
// duplicate values found here, write code to handle duplicate values
}
}
}
As you specifically said you didn't want to use array_unique I'm going to ignore the other answers despite the fact they're probably better.
Why don't you use array_count_values() and then check if the resulting array has any value greater than 1?
Php has an function to count the occurrences in the array http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.array-count-values.php
You can do it like that way also:
This will return true if unique else return false.
$nofollow = (count($modelIdArr) !== count(array_unique($modelIdArr))) ? true : false;
The simple solution but quite faster.
$elements = array_merge(range(1,10000000),[1]);
function unique_val_inArray($arr) {
$count = count($arr);
foreach ($arr as $i_1 => $value) {
for($i_2 = $i_1 + 1; $i_2 < $count; $i_2++) {
if($arr[$i_2] === $arr[$i_1]){
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
}
$time = microtime(true);
unique_val_inArray($elements);
echo 'This solution: ', (microtime(true) - $time), 's', PHP_EOL;
Speed - [0.71]!
function hasDuplicate($array){
$d = array();
foreach($array as $elements) {
if(!isset($d[$elements])){
$d[$elements] = 1;
}else{
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
Related
I'm sure this is an extremely obvious question, and that there's a function that does exactly this, but I can't seem to find it. In PHP, I'd like to know if my array has duplicates in it, as efficiently as possible. I don't want to remove them like array_unique does, and I don't particularly want to run array_unique and compare it to the original array to see if they're the same, as this seems very inefficient. As far as performance is concerned, the "expected condition" is that the array has no duplicates.
I'd just like to be able to do something like
if (no_dupes($array))
// this deals with arrays without duplicates
else
// this deals with arrays with duplicates
Is there any obvious function I'm not thinking of?
How to detect duplicate values in PHP array?
has the right title, and is a very similar question, however if you actually read the question, he's looking for array_count_values.
I know you are not after array_unique(). However, you will not find a magical obvious function nor will writing one be faster than making use of the native functions.
I propose:
function array_has_dupes($array) {
// streamline per #Felix
return count($array) !== count(array_unique($array));
}
Adjust the second parameter of array_unique() to meet your comparison needs.
Performance-Optimized Solution
If you care about performance and micro-optimizations, check this one-liner:
function no_dupes(array $input_array) {
return count($input_array) === count(array_flip($input_array));
}
Description:
Function compares number of array elements in $input_array with array_flip'ed elements. Values become keys and guess what - keys must be unique in associative arrays so not unique values are lost and final number of elements is lower than original.
Warning:
As noted in the manual, array keys can be only type of int or string so this is what you must have in original array values to compare, otherwise PHP will start casting with unexpected results. See https://3v4l.org/7bRXI for an example of this fringe-case failure mode.
Proof for an array with 10 million records:
The top-voted solution by Jason McCreary: 14.187316179276s ππππππππππππππ
The accepted solution by Mike Sherov: 2.0736091136932s ππ
This answer's solution: 0.14155888557434s π/10
Test case:
<?php
$elements = array_merge(range(1,10000000),[1]);
$time = microtime(true);
accepted_solution($elements);
echo 'Accepted solution: ', (microtime(true) - $time), 's', PHP_EOL;
$time = microtime(true);
most_voted_solution($elements);
echo 'Most voted solution: ', (microtime(true) - $time), 's', PHP_EOL;
$time = microtime(true);
this_answer_solution($elements);
echo 'This answer solution: ', (microtime(true) - $time), 's', PHP_EOL;
function accepted_solution($array){
$dupe_array = array();
foreach($array as $val){
// sorry, but I had to add below line to remove millions of notices
if(!isset($dupe_array[$val])){$dupe_array[$val]=0;}
if(++$dupe_array[$val] > 1){
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
function most_voted_solution($array) {
return count($array) !== count(array_unique($array));
}
function this_answer_solution(array $input_array) {
return count($input_array) === count(array_flip($input_array));
}
Notice that accepted solution might be faster in certain condition when not unique values are near the beginning of huge array.
You can do:
function has_dupes($array) {
$dupe_array = array();
foreach ($array as $val) {
if (++$dupe_array[$val] > 1) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
$hasDuplicates = count($array) > count(array_unique($array));
Will be true if duplicates, or false if no duplicates.
Here's my take on this⦠after some benchmarking, I found this to be the fastest method for this.
function has_duplicates( $array ) {
return count( array_keys( array_flip( $array ) ) ) !== count( $array );
}
β¦or depending on circumstances this could be marginally faster.
function has_duplicates( $array ) {
$array = array_count_values( $array );
rsort( $array );
return $array[0] > 1;
}
$duplicate = false;
if(count(array) != count(array_unique(array))){
$duplicate = true;
}
Keep it simple, silly! ;)
Simple OR logic...
function checkDuplicatesInArray($array){
$duplicates=FALSE;
foreach($array as $k=>$i){
if(!isset($value_{$i})){
$value_{$i}=TRUE;
}
else{
$duplicates|=TRUE;
}
}
return ($duplicates);
}
Regards!
To remove all the empty values from the comparison you can add array_diff()
if (count(array_unique(array_diff($array,array("")))) < count(array_diff($array,array(""))))
Reference taken from #AndreKR answer from here
Two ways to do it efficiently that I can think of:
inserting all the values into some sort of hashtable and checking whether the value you're inserting is already in it(expected O(n) time and O(n) space)
sorting the array and then checking whether adjacent cells are equal( O(nlogn) time and O(1) or O(n) space depending on the sorting algorithm)
stormdrain's solution would probably be O(n^2), as would any solution which involves scanning the array for each element searching for a duplicate
Find this useful solution
function get_duplicates( $array ) {
return array_unique( array_diff_assoc( $array, array_unique( $array ) ) );
}
After that count result if greater than 0 than duplicates else unique.
I'm using this:
if(count($array)==count(array_count_values($array))){
echo("all values are unique");
}else{
echo("there's dupe values");
}
I don't know if it's the fastest but works pretty good so far
One more solution from me, this is related to performance improvement
$array_count_values = array_count_values($array);
if(is_array($array_count_values) && count($array_count_values)>0)
{
foreach ($array_count_values as $key => $value)
{
if($value>1)
{
// duplicate values found here, write code to handle duplicate values
}
}
}
As you specifically said you didn't want to use array_unique I'm going to ignore the other answers despite the fact they're probably better.
Why don't you use array_count_values() and then check if the resulting array has any value greater than 1?
Php has an function to count the occurrences in the array http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.array-count-values.php
You can do it like that way also:
This will return true if unique else return false.
$nofollow = (count($modelIdArr) !== count(array_unique($modelIdArr))) ? true : false;
The simple solution but quite faster.
$elements = array_merge(range(1,10000000),[1]);
function unique_val_inArray($arr) {
$count = count($arr);
foreach ($arr as $i_1 => $value) {
for($i_2 = $i_1 + 1; $i_2 < $count; $i_2++) {
if($arr[$i_2] === $arr[$i_1]){
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
}
$time = microtime(true);
unique_val_inArray($elements);
echo 'This solution: ', (microtime(true) - $time), 's', PHP_EOL;
Speed - [0.71]!
function hasDuplicate($array){
$d = array();
foreach($array as $elements) {
if(!isset($d[$elements])){
$d[$elements] = 1;
}else{
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
Im trying to select the difference between 2(Two) Array. And yes, I have a solution using loop. But I think its a big problem because using so many loops make the process slow. Im asking if there's alternative way or a simple way on how to do it with the same output.
This is my code
$unique = [];
$first_array = [["SERIAL_NUMBER" => "1"]];
$second_array = [["SERIAL_NUMBER" => "1"],["SERIAL_NUMBER" => "2"]];
foreach ($second_array as $second) {
foreach($first_array as $first)
{
if($second['SERIAL_NUMBER'] == $first['SERIAL_NUMBER'])
{
continue 2;
}
}
$unique[] = $second;
}
foreach ($first_array as $first) {
foreach($second_array as $second)
{
if($first['SERIAL_NUMBER'] == $second['SERIAL_NUMBER'])
{
continue 2;
}
}
$unique[] = $first;
}
echo json_encode($unique);
The result will be the difference of 2(two) array.
PS: This is base on specific key of the multidimensional array (SERIAL_NUMBER)
[{"SERIAL_NUMBER":"2"}]
The difference is that most things will use some sort of loop, even if you don't see the loop in your code it may be done internally.
This code uses array_udiff(), mainly to simplify the code, but also as it's a multidimensional array - you can't just use array_diff(). The function just compare the SERIAL_NUMBER values of each elements.
This is done once in each direction (1 => 2 and 2 => 1) and then merges the results...
function udiffCompare($a, $b)
{
return $a['SERIAL_NUMBER'] <=> $b['SERIAL_NUMBER'];
}
$arrdiff1 = array_udiff($first_array, $second_array, 'udiffCompare');
$arrdiff2 = array_udiff($second_array, $first_array, 'udiffCompare');
$difference = array_merge($arrdiff1, $arrdiff2);
in a very tight loop I need to access tens of thousands of values in an array containing millions of elements. The key can be undefined: In that case it shall be legal to return NULL without any error message:
Array key exists: return value of element.
Array key does not exist: return null.
I do know multiple solutions:
if (isset($lookup_table[$key])) {
return $lookup_table[$key];
} else {
return;
}
or
#return $lookup_table[$key];
or
error_reporting(0);
$return = $lookup_table[$key];
error_reporting(E_ALL);
return $return;
All solutions are far from optimal:
The first one requires 2 lookup in the B-TREE: One to check existence, another to retrieve value. That effectively doubles the runtime.
The second one uses the error suppression operator, and thus creates a massive overhead on that line.
The third one calls the error handler (that will check error_reporting setting and then display nothing) and thereby creates an overhead.
My question is if I miss a way to avoid error handling and yet work with a single Btree lookup?
To answer some questions:
The array caches the results of a complex calculation - to complex to be done in real time.
Out of billions of possible values, only millions yield a valid result. The array looks like 1234567 => 23457, 1234999 => 74361, .... That is saved to a PHP file of several megabyte, and include_once-d at the beginning of the execution. Initial load time does not matter.
If the key is not found, it simply means that this specific value will not return a valid result. The trouble is to get this done 50k+ per second.
Conclusion
Edit: outdated, check the accepted answer.
As there is no way found to get the value with a single lookup and without error handling, I have trouble accepting a single answer. Instead I upvoted all the great contributions.
The most valuable inputs where:
use array_key_exists, as it is faster than alternatives
Check out PHP's QuickHash
There was a lot of confusion on how PHP handles arrays. If you check the source code, you will see that all arrays are balanced trees. Building own lookup methods is common in C and C++, but is not performant in higher script-languages like PHP.
Update
Since PHP 7 you can accomplish this with the null coalesce operator:
return $table[$key] ?? null;
Old answer
First of all, arrays are not implemented as a B-tree, it's a hash table; an array of buckets (indexed via a hash function), each with a linked list of actual values (in case of hash collisions). This means that lookup times depend on how well the hash function has "spread" the values across the buckets, i.e. the number of hash collisions is an important factor.
Technically, this statement is the most correct:
return array_key_exists($key, $table) ? $table[$key] : null;
This introduces a function call and is therefore much slower than the optimized isset(). How much? ~2e3 times slower.
Next up is using a reference to avoid the second lookup:
$tmp = &$lookup_table[$key];
return isset($tmp) ? $tmp : null;
Unfortunately, this modifies the original $lookup_table array if the item does not exist, because references are always made valid by PHP.
That leaves the following method, which is much like your own:
return isset($lookup_table[$key]) ? $lookup_table[$key] : null;
Besides not having the side effect of references, it's also faster in runtime, even when performing the lookup twice.
You could look into dividing your arrays into smaller pieces as one way to mitigate long lookup times.
I did some bench marking with the following code:
set_time_limit(100);
$count = 2500000;
$search_index_end = $count * 1.5;
$search_index_start = $count * .5;
$array = array();
for ($i = 0; $i < $count; $i++)
$array[md5($i)] = $i;
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = $search_index_start; $i < $search_index_end; $i++) {
$key = md5($i);
$test = isset($array[$key]) ? $array[$key] : null;
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo ($end - $start) . " seconds<br/>";
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = $search_index_start; $i < $search_index_end; $i++) {
$key = md5($i);
$test = array_key_exists($key, $array) ? $array[$key] : null;
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo ($end - $start) . " seconds<br/>";
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = $search_index_start; $i < $search_index_end; $i++) {
$key = md5($i);
$test = #$array[$key];
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo ($end - $start) . " seconds<br/>";
$error_reporting = error_reporting();
error_reporting(0);
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = $search_index_start; $i < $search_index_end; $i++) {
$key = md5($i);
$test = $array[$key];
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo ($end - $start) . " seconds<br/>";
error_reporting($error_reporting);
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = $search_index_start; $i < $search_index_end; $i++) {
$key = md5($i);
$tmp = &$array[$key];
$test = isset($tmp) ? $tmp : null;
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo ($end - $start) . " seconds<br/>";
and I found that the fastest running test was the one that uses isset($array[$key]) ? $array[$key] : null followed closely by the solution that just disables error reporting.
This Work for me
{{ isset($array['key']) ? $array['key']: 'Default' }}
but this is fast
{{ $array['key'] or 'Default' }}
There are two typical approaches to this.
Define defaults for an undefined key.
Check for undefined key.
Here is how to perform the first and as little code as possible.
$data = array_merge(array($key=>false),$data);
return $data[$key];
Here is how to perform the second.
return isset($data[$key]) ? $data[$key] : false;
Just a sudden idea that would have to be tested, but did you try using array_intersect_key() to get the existing values and a array_merge to fill() the rest ? It would remove the need of a loop to access the data. Something like that :
$searched_keys = array ('key1' => null, 'key2' => null); // the list of the keys to find
$exiting_values = array_intersect_key($lookup_table, $searched_keys);
$all_values = array_merge($searched_keys, $exiting_keys);
Please note that I did not tried it performance-wise.
The # operator and the error_reporting methods will both be slower than using isset. With both of these methods, it modifies the error reporting setting for PHP, but PHP's error handler will still be called. The error handler will check against the error_reporting setting and exit without reporting anything, however this has still taken time.
I prefer using the isset function instead of escaping the error.
I made a function to check the key exists and if not returns a default value, in the case of nested arrays you just need to add the other keys in order:
Nested array lookup:
/**
* Lookup array value.
*
* #param array $array
* #param array $keys
* #param $defaultValue
*/
public static function array_key_lookup($array, $keys, $defaultValue)
{
$value = $array;
foreach ($keys as $key) {
if (isset($value[$key])) {
$value = $value[$key];
} else {
$value = $defaultValue;
break;
}
}
return $value;
}
Usage example:
$array = [
'key1' => 'value1',
'key2' => 'value2',
'key3' => [
'key3a' => 'value3a',
'key3b' => 'value3b'
]
];
array_key_lookup($array, ['key3', 'key3a'], 'default')
'value3a'
array_key_lookup($array, ['key2', 'key2a'], 'default')
'default'
array_key_lookup($array, ['key2'], 'default')
'value2'
array_key_lookup($array, ['key5'], 'default')
'default'
Escaping the error:
$value = #$array[$key1][$key2] ?: $defaultValue;
First, re-organize the data for performance by saving a new array where the data is sorted by the keys, but the new array contains a regular numeric index.
This part will be time consuming, but only done once.
// first sort the array by it's keys
ksort($data);
// second create a new array with numeric index
$tmp = new array();
foreach($data as $key=>$value)
{
$tmp[] = array('key'=>$key,'value'=>$value);
}
// now save and use this data instead
save_to_file($tmp);
Once that is done it should be quick to find the key using a Binary Search. Later you can use a function like this.
function findKey($key, $data, $start, $end)
{
if($end < $start)
{
return null;
}
$mid = (int)(($end - $start) / 2) + $start;
if($data[$mid]['key'] > $key)
{
return findKey($key, $data, $start, $mid - 1);
}
else if($data[$mid]['key'] < $key)
{
return findKey($key, $data, $mid + 1, $end);
}
return $data[$mid]['value'];
}
To perform a search for a key you would do this.
$result = findKey($key, $data, 0, count($data));
if($result === null)
{
// key not found.
}
If the count($data) is done all the time, then you could cache that in the file that you stored the array data.
I suspect this method will be a lot faster in performance then a regular linear search that is repeated against the $data. I can't promise it's faster. Only an octree would be quicker, but the time to build the octree might cancel out the search performance (I've experienced that before). It depends on how much searching in the data you have to do.
If I have a PHP array:
$array
With values:
45,41,40,39,37,31
And I have a variable:
$number = 38;
How can I return the value?:
39
Because that is the closest value to 38 (counting up) in the array?
Regards,
taylor
<?php
function closest($array, $number) {
sort($array);
foreach ($array as $a) {
if ($a >= $number) return $a;
}
return end($array); // or return NULL;
}
?>
Here is a high-level process to get the desired results and work for any array data:
Filter the array keeping on values greater than or equal to the target and then select the lowest remaining value. This is the "best" value (which may be "nothing" if all the values were less) -- this is O(n)
Alternatively, sort the data first and see below -- this is O(n lg n) (hopefully)
Now, assuming that the array is sorted ASCENDING, this approach would work:
Loop through the array and find the first element which is larger than or equal to the target -- this is O(n)
And if the array is DESCENDING (as in the post), do as above, but either:
Iterate backwards -- this is O(n)
Sort it ASCENDING first (see fardjad's answer) -- this is O(n lg n) (hopefully)
Iterate forwards but keep a look-behind value (to remember "next highest" if the exact was skipped) -- this is O(n)
Happy coding.
EDIT typo on array_search
Yo... Seems easy enough. Here's a function
<?php
$array = array(45,41,40,39,37,31);
function closest($array, $number){
#does the array already contain the number?
if($i = array_search( $number, $array)) return $i;
#add the number to the array
$array[] = $number;
#sort and refind the number
sort($array);
$i = array_search($number, $array);
#check if there is a number above it
if($i && isset($array[$i+1])) return $array[$i+1];
//alternatively you could return the number itself here, or below it depending on your requirements
return null;
}
to Run echo closest($array, 38);
Here's a smaller function that will also return the closest value. Helpful if you don't want to sort the array (to preserve keys).
function closest($array, $number) {
//does an exact match exist?
if ($i=array_search($number, $array)) return $i;
//find closest
foreach ($array as $match) {
$diff = abs($number-$match); //get absolute value of difference
if (!isset($closeness) || (isset($closeness) && $closeness>$diff)) {
$closeness = $diff;
$closest = $match;
}
}
return $closest;
}
Do a linear scan of each number and update two variables and you'll be done.
Python code (performance is O(N), I don't think it's possible to beat O(N)):
def closestNum(numArray, findNum):
diff = infinity # replace with actual infinity value
closestNum = infinity # can be set to any value
for num in numArray:
if((num - findNum) > 0 and (num - findNum) < diff):
diff = num - findNum
closestNum = num
return closestNum
Please add null checks as appropriate.
If you really want the value that's "closest" in distance, even if it's a lesser value, try this, which #Jason gets most of the credit for.
Imagine a scenario when you want the closest number to 38.9 in the following:
$array = array(37.5, 38.5, 39.5);
Most of the solutions here would give you 39.5, when 38.5 is much closer.
This solution would only take the next highest value if what you're looking is in the exact middle between two numbers in the array:
function nearest_value($value, $array) {
if (array_search($value, $array)) {
return $value;
} else {
$array[] = $value;
sort($array);
$key = array_search($value, $array);
if ($key == 0) { return $array[$key+1]; }
if ($key == sizeof($array)-1) { return $array[$key-1]; }
$dist_to_ceil = $array[$key+1]-$value;
$dist_to_floor = $value-$array[$key-1];
if ($dist_to_ceil <= $dist_to_floor) {
return $array[$key+1];
} else {
return $array[$key-1];
}
}
}
What it lacks in elegance, it makes up for in accuracy. Again, much thanks to #Jason.
Try this simple PHP function:
<?php
function nearest($number, $numbers) {
$output = FALSE;
$number = intval($number);
if (is_array($numbers) && count($numbers) >= 1) {
$NDat = array();
foreach ($numbers as $n)
$NDat[abs($number - $n)] = $n;
ksort($NDat);
$NDat = array_values($NDat);
$output = $NDat[0];
}
return $output;
}
echo nearest(90, array(0, 50, 89, 150, 200, 250));
?>
I made a shorter function for that:
function nearestNumber($num, $array) {
if(!in_array($num, $array)) $array[] = $num;
sort($array);
$idx = array_search($num, $array);
if(($array[$idx] -$array[$idx-1]) >= ($array[$idx+1] -$array[$idx])) return $array[$idx+1];
else return $array[$idx-1];
}
Works great in my case: $array = array(128,160,192,224,256,320); $num = 203 :)
It's taking the nearest number and if there's the same distance between two numbers (like 208 for my example), the next highest number is used.
+1 to Jason.
My implementation below, but not as brisk
$array = array(1,2,4,5,7,8,9);
function closest($array, $number) {
$array = array_flip($array);
if(array_key_exists($number, $array)) return $number;
$array[$number] = true;
sort($array);
$rendered = array_slice($array, $number, 2, true);
$rendered = array_keys($rendered);
if(array_key_exists(1, $rendered)) return $rendered[1];
return false;
}
print_r(closest($array, 3));
You could use array_reduce for this, which makes it more functional programming style:
function closest($needle, $haystack) {
return array_reduce($haystack, function($a, $b) use ($needle) {
return abs($needle-$a) < abs($needle-$b) ? $a : $b;
});
}
For the rest, this follows the same principle as the other O(n) solutions.
Here is my solution.
$array=array(10,56,78,17,30);
$num=65;
$diff=$num;
$min=$num;
foreach($array as $a){
if( abs($a-$num)< $diff ){
$diff=abs($a-$num);
$min=$a;
}
}
echo $min;
In web development, I often find I need to format and print various arrays of data, and separate these blocks of data in some manner. In other words, I need to be able to insert code between each loop, without said code being inserted before the first entry or after the last one. The most elegant way I've found to accomplish this is as follows:
function echoWithBreaks($array){
for($i=0; $i<count($array); $i++){
//Echo an item
if($i<count($array)-1){
//Echo "between code"
}
}
}
Unfortunately, there's no way that I can see to implement this solution with foreach instead of for. Does anyone know of a more elegant solution that will work with foreach?
I think you're looking for the implode function.
Then just echo the imploded string.
The only more elegant i can think of making that exact algorithm is this:
function implodeEcho($array, $joinValue)
{
foreach($array as $i => $val)
{
if ($i != 0) echo $joinValue;
echo $val;
}
}
This of course assumes $array only is indexed by integers and not by keys.
Unfortunately, I don't think there is any way to do that with foreach. This is a problem in many languages.
I typically solve this one of two ways:
The way you mention above, except with $i > 0 rather than $i < count($array) - 1.
Using join or implode.
A trick I use sometimes:
function echoWithBreaks($array){
$prefix = '';
foreach($array as $item){
echo $prefix;
//Echo item
$prefix = '<between code>';
}
}
If more elaborate code then an implode could handle I'd use a simple boolean:
$looped = false;
foreach($arr as $var){
if($looped){
//do between
}
$looped = true;
//do something with $var
}