codeigniter array - php

How can I grab this data and increment it in Codeigniter?
$_SESSION['cart'][$_GET[id]]++;

because CI destroys the $_GET array, you can do this
$_SESSION['cart'][$this->uri->segment(3)]++;
where 3 is the URL segment of the ID. But I would look in to the shopping cart class as recommended by Malachi.
from the docs ~
$data = array(
'rowid' => 'b99ccdf16028f015540f341130b6d8ec',
'qty' => 3
);
$this->cart->update($data);

It's frowned upon, but if you really want to use the $_GET var you can always do the following:
parse_str($_SERVER['QUERY_STRING'],$_GET);
I would stick with using URI segments as shown by Ross or have the 'id' supplied as a parameter in the controller function.

maybe like this...
$cart = $this->session->userdata('cart');
$cart[$this->uri->segment(3)];

$this->input->get() is no longer messed with, so GET away.

You can do in this way.
By passing variable in your controller function, Your controller function will look like this
function my_function($id='')
{
//Your code goes here
$my_cart = $this->session->userdata('cart');
$my_data = $my_cart[$id];
}

Related

Laravel Store Array in Session

I have been having trouble storing an array in session. I am making a shopping cart and it doesn't seem to work.
public function __construct(){
$product = array(1,2,3,4);
Session::push('cart', $product);
}
and then retrieve it in the view like this.
{{Session::get('cart')}}
However I keep getting an error like this.
htmlentities() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given
Any clues and advice on how to create a shopping cart that stores an array of items.
If you need to use the array from session as a string, you need to use Collection like this:
$product = collect([1,2,3,4]);
Session::push('cart', $product);
This will make it work when you will be using {{Session::get('cart');}} in your htmls. Be aware of Session::push because it will append always the new products in sessions. You should be using Session::put to be sure the products will be always updating.
You're storing an array in the session, and since {{ }} expects a string, you can't use {{Session::get('cart')}} to display the value.
The {{ $var }} is the same as writing echo htmlentities($var) (a very simple example).
Instead, you could do something like:
#foreach (Session::get('cart') as $product_id)
{{$product_id}}
#endforeach
If you use 'push', when initially creating the array in the session, then the array will look like this:
[
0 => [1,2,3,4]
]
Instead you should use 'put':
$products = [1,2,3,4];
$request->session()->put('cart', $products);
Any subsequent values should be pushed onto the session array:
$request->session()->push('cart', 5);
You can use .:
$product = array(1,2,3,4);
Session::put('cart.product',$product);
You can declare an array in session like
$cart = session('data', []);
$cart[] = $product;
session([ 'data' => $cart]);
return session('data', []);
you can also do it like that:
$data = collect($Array);
Session()->put('data', $data);
return view('pagename');

How to apply PHP function to a column returned from CakePHP query

In my controller I am retrieving records from my institutions table with the following fields
$params = array(
'fields' => array(
'Institution.id',
'Institution.name',
'Institution.about',
'Institution.picture'),
);
$institutions = $this->Institution->find('all',$params);
How can I prefix each 'Institution.picture' field with the full URL address, 'Institution.picture' itself only holds the name of the file.
I would also like to perform html_entity_decode() on each 'Institution.about' value from the returned set.
I know how to do this only without the framework if I make custom queries from scratch, then I would iterate each row and apply PHP functions to the field of interest. But is there a place in CakePHP (find or paginator) that I can specify such PHP manipulation on each field value from the returned set?
NOTE: I don't like to do this in the View, as I want to output it as json directly
You can define a virtualField for model:
public $virtualFields = array('image_url' => "CONCAT('/img/', Institution.picture)");
$params = array(
'fields' => array(
'Institution.id',
'Institution.name',
'Institution.about',
'Institution.picture',
'Institution.image_url'),
);
$institutions = $this->Institution->find('all',$params);
Unfortunaly MySQL doesn't have a function to decode HTML entities. You may utilize an afterFind() callback instead of virtualField. This lets you to decode entities as well as add a prefix.
CakePHP is php
Just iterate over the array and prepare it however you want:
$institutions = $this->Institution->find('all',$params);
$prefix = '/img/'; // <- define this
foreach ($institutions as &$row) {
$row['Institution']['about'] = html_entity_decode($row['Institution']['about']);
$row['Institution']['picture'] = $prefix . $row['Institution']['picture'];
}
If this is always required it can be applied to all finds via an afterFind method in the institution class.
I think you should do it in the View. See this example.
Hash::map can be very useful here. By specifying path you can only modify slices of the set.

CakePHP array() is empty, but query seems to be getting the correct results

I am trying to extract ONLY the PlanDetails where PlanDetail.company_id = Company.id AND PlanDetail.id' => $id.. ( you can see the conditions in my controller below)..
Controller:
function pd_list_by_company($id = null) {
$this->recursive = 2; // I am going to use containable to trim this.
return $this->PlanDetail->find('all',
array('conditions' =>
array('AND' =>
array('PlanDetail.company_id' => 'Company.id',
array('PlanDetail.id' => $id)))));
}
Test View:
$planDetailsByCompany = $this->requestAction('/planDetails/pd_list_by_company');
debug($planDetailsByCompany );
Output result of my debug??
Array()
If I remove the conditions and just have the find all, I get all PlanDetails as expected, so I know the data is being passed.. SQL debug dump even shows the query:
WHERE ((`PlanDetail`.`company_id` = 'Company.id') AND (`PlanDetail`.`id` IS NULL))
And yes, I did notice the $id is NULL, and I know the value needs to be there.. So maybe my question is why is the $id value not being passed to the controller even though I can see the PlanDetail.id value on a find('all') w/ out the conditions??
Thanks for any tips.
Since $id seems to be null, I would assume that you call the function without the parameter. And you don't get an error message, because as far as PHP is concerned the parameter is optional. In this case it's clearly required, so you should make it a required parameter in your function declaration:
function pd_list_by_company($id) {
Also you could simplify the return statement, you do not need the AND:
return $this->PlanDetail->find('all',
array('conditions' =>
array('PlanDetail.company_id' => 'Company.id','PlanDetail.id' => $id)
)
);
To answer the question why is the $id not being passed is because you're not passing it
To pass say $id of 2 you need to do the following in your requestAction
$this->requestAction('/planDetails/pd_list_by_company/2');
Seems to me that your code should just be
return $this->PlanDetail->find('array('PlanDetail.id' => $id));
Assuming you have the $this->PlanDetail->recursive flag set to > 0, your Model should already know about and return the associated data for any 'Company' table.....
I'm used to an old (1.3) version of CakePHP but the find() function is pretty basic and is designed to only return one row.
and yes, you definitely need to call the function with the id appended to the url, eg.
$planDetailsByCompany = $this->requestAction('/planDetails/pd_list_by_company/999');

Passing additional parameters to the Zend partialLoop View Helper

In a Zend view I can apply a partial template to an iterable element as follows:
$this->partialLoop('template.phtml', $iterable);
However inside the template, only the elements of the $iterable are available, is there another way of passing extra data to the partial?
I use
$this->partialLoop('template.phtml', array(
'data' => $iterable,
'otherVariable' => $otherVariable
);
Warning & Edit:
To be completly honest, I made a mistake. I guess that the code I proposed won't work. I mistaken it for the partial() helper. It won't work because of this part of the helper's class:
foreach ($model as $item) {
// increment the counter variable
$this->partialCounter++;
$content .= $this->partial($name, $module, $item);
}
It will iterate over the whole array instead of the "data" key. I don't get how the answer could be accepted :D Thanks to Nikolaus Dulgeridis for pointing that out.
You can't even post any extra data through $this->view because the point of partial is that it creates "clean" view instance - so that the assigned variables won't collide with your existing variables.
Possible options
- Extend the view helper with methods to set custom variables
- Iterate the array and reformat it to
array(
array('data' => $item1, 'id' => 1, 'totalCount' => 10) ,
array('data' => $item2, 'id' => 2, 'totalCount' => 10) ,
array('data' => $item3, 'id' => 3, 'totalCount' => 10) ,
)
- Use Registry to store the values.
Zend_Registry::set('partialLoopCount', $count);
$this->partialLoop($viewScript, $data);
- Dump partialLoop and use partial() instead
I prefer this solution.
$count = count($data);
foreach ($data as $key => $value) {
echo $this->partial($viewScript, array('item' => $value, 'position' => $key, 'count' => $count));
}
Inside the partial, you can access all of your view variables with:
$this->partialLoop()->view->myVariable
where myVariable is a normal view variable ($this->view->myVariable in the controller or
$this->myVariable in the view, which it's actually the same thing).
Basically, you retrieve the PartialLoop() object, then the view which called it, and then the variable itself.
This, though, will probably impact performance (and I don't think it's really MVC friendly...)
But, hey: it works. :)
An example here:
Hardcode.nl == Joris Osterhaus
Later I found (insert in partial):
$this->getHelper('PartialLoop')->view->otherVariable;
You can access parent view variables by this way :
$this->ViewModel()->getCurrent()->getVariable('parentVariable');
Found at http://blog.dossantos.com.au/how-to-access-parent-view-variables-from-a-partial-loop-in-zf2
In controller
$this->view->otherVariable = 'otherVariable';
In "partial file" - template.phtml
$this->otherVariable
(ZendFramework-1.11.4-minimal)

Is there an advantage to using parse_str for optional function parameters vs an array?

I happened to be making some changes to a WordPress blog and noticed that they use parse_str (http://php.net/parse_str) for parsing and setting their optional parameters to a function.
I'm wondering if there is an advantage to this over sending an array?
Examples:
With array:
$blahOptions = array(
'option_1' => true,
);
BlahArray($blahOptions);
function BlahArray($options = array()) {
$defaults = array(
'option_1' => false,
'option_2' => 'blah',
);
// this would probably be in a function to be used everywhere
foreach ($defaults as $defaultOption => $defaultValue) {
if (!isset($options[$defaultOption])) $options[$defaultOption] = $defaultValue;
}
}
With parse_str:
$blahOptions = 'option_1=1';
BlahString($blahOptions);
function BlahString($options = '') {
$defaults = array(
'option_1' => false,
'option_2' => 'blah',
);
parse_str($options, $defaults);
$options = $defaults;
}
No. That seems like a ridiculous way to pass functional parameter arguments. I could understand it if you needed to recreate $_GET or $_POST variables or something along those lines, but for parameters to a function? That's code smell right there.
They should be using an array, and then utilizing extract() instead. I've worked with Wordpress before, and my advice is to keep the code at arm's length. It is not an example of model programming.
No. There are more disadvantages than advantages.
When you’re using a single string, you just can pass string values. With an array you can use every PHP data type and every element’s value type is independently of each other.
With parse_str, you can potentially drop in the query string from the URL, and the function will work. If you use an array, and you want to use the query string, you'll have to enumerate everything into an array before calling the function.
I'm not totally convinced it's the best way to go, but I see how it can add a bit of flexibility.

Categories