Why won't it shuffle the array so I get a random result each time?
class greeting {
public $greet = array('hi','hello');
shuffle($greet);
}
$hi = new greeting;
echo $hi->greet[1];
Is their something wrong with my code?
If you change it so the shuffle is inside the constructor it should work fine.
class greeting {
public $greet = array('hi','hello');
function __construct(){
shuffle($this->greet);
}
}
any calculation can not be executed outside the method, inside class.
class greeting {
public $greet = array('hi','hello');
function __construct()
{
shuffle($this->greet);
}
}
$hi = new greeting;
echo $hi->greet[1];
Inside a class block you can only define constants, properties (both with fixed values) and methods. You can't put code in that block, code can only be placed inside methods (AKA functions).
Related
Since I am aware that one can call a member function on Class stored as String. But I was wondering if there is any way to do the same for static member function in PHP.
for example:
class A
{
public static function run(){
echo "OK";
}
}
"A"::"run"()
Something similar to the above example.
Please help me out. Thanks in advance.
you can call class as string like this
<?php
class A
{
public static function run()
{
echo "OK";
}
}
$stringClass = "A";
$staticMethod = "run";
$stringClass::$staticMethod();
To tackle this type of problem, which I faced while developing a user-friendly PHP framework, is to store the class name and static method name as a string in some PHP variables.
$className = "A";
$methodName = "run";
And call it like so:
$className::$methodName();
or second way
$func = "A::run";
$func(); //or
"A::run"();
And this is how one calls the static method on the class stored as a string.
This one of the ways, more can be found at https://www.designcise.com/web/tutorial/how-to-dynamically-invoke-a-class-method-in-php
Using as an example the class defined here
class Testclass {
private $testvar = "default value";
public function setTestvar($testvar) {
$this->testvar = $testvar;
}
public function getTestvar() {
return $this->testvar;
}
function dosomething()
{
echo $this->getTestvar();
}
}
$Testclass = new Testclass();
$Testclass->setTestvar("another value");
$Testclass->dosomething();
I would like to add inside a function "one more value", like this:
function test_function() {
$Testclass->setTestvar("one more value");
}
But it doesn´t work. I gives the error message undefined variable Testclass. In order to make it work, I have to define the variable as global within the function, like this:
function test_function() {
global Testclass;
$Testclass->setTestvar("one more value");
}
I am quite new to PHP, but it seems rather strange to me this way of using it. From the main PHP file it´s already defined, but when I use it from a function I have to define again.Basically what I am trying to do is to create a class that creates a new file and adds strings to it from different functions. Is there not a better way? Any suggestions? Many thanks in advance.
One way is to use singleton
MyClass::getInstance()->doSomethingUsefull();
Sometimes you can use static method
MyClass::doIt();
Functions have their own private variable scope. So (for example) you can use $i in a function without worrying about it screwing up another $i somewhere else in the program. If you want to have a function perform actions on an already-existing object, just pass the object as a parameter to the function:
function test_function(Testclass $testclass)
{
$testclass->setTestvar("one more value");
}
Then call it with your object:
$Testclass = new Testclass();
test_function($Testclass);
Note: If the functions you're defining outside the class are tightly related to the class, then you probably want to define them as methods inside the class instead of separate stand-alone functions.
After 9 hours of struggling to get this right, I have turned to the internet for help. I can't seem to find any relevant answers doing a Google search.
I currently have a class called Test. Test accepts a single argument.
<?php
class test {
private $varpassed;
public function getVarpas() {
return $this->varpassed;
}
Public function setVarpas($value) {
$this->varpassed= $value;
}
public function stringGen(){
$testvar = $this->varpassed;
echo $testvar;
}
}
The stringGen function should return the $varpassed variable whenever its called. The value for $varpassed is set using the setVarpas function. However, when ever I call the stringGen() method I only seem to be getting the following error:
Fatal error: Using $this when not in object context in file.php line 14.
Pointing to this line:
$testvar = $this->varpassed;
Is there any other way to pass the variable to the stringGen method? I've tried using:
self::$this->varpassed;
Which also throws an error.
first create an instance of the object (so you can use $this in the context), for example:
$test = new test();
then you can call:
$test->setVarpas('Hello World!');
now you can call:
$test->stringGen();
you have to do something like this
$var = new test();
$var->setVarpas("Hello");
$var->stringGen(); // this will echo Hello
$this is used when you are withing class. outside class you have to use class object.
1) Change this: class test() to class test
2) Create and instance first something like $t1 = new test();
3) Call the function $t1->setVarpas(5);
4) Now you can call the function $t1->stringGen();
Fixed:
<?php
class test
{
private $varpassed;
public function getVarpas() {
return $this->varpassed;
}
Public function setVarpas($value) {
$this->varpassed= $value;
}
public function stringGen(){
$testvar = $this->varpassed;
echo $testvar;
}
}
$t1 = new test();
$t1->setVarpas(5);
$t1->stringGen();
OUTPUT:
5
You should not declare a class with parentheses.
Use
class test {
instead of
class test(){
I have a class that generates data based on a few things. I would like to format that data from the outside. So I am trying to pass a function into the class so that it would format that data. I have looked at many examples, but it seems this is unique.
Can anybody give an idea of how to do this? The following code gives an error.
<?php
class someClass {
var $outsideFunc; // placeholder for function to be defined from outside
var $somevar='Me'; // generated text
function echoarg($abc){
$outsideFunc=$this->outsideFunc; // bring the outside function in
call_user_func($outsideFunc,$abc); // execute outside function on text
echo $abc;
}
}
function outsidefunc($param){ // define custom function
$param='I am '.$param;
}
$someClass=new someClass();
$someClass -> outsideFunc = 'outsideFunc'; // send custom function into Class
$someClass -> echoarg($someClass->somevar);
$someClass -> outsidefunc = 'outsidefunc';
In PHP, function names are not case sensitive, yet object property names are. You need $someClass->outsideFunc, not $someClass->outsidefunc.
Note that good OOP design practice calls for the use of getter and setter methods rather than just accessing properties directly from outside code. Also note that PHP 5.3 introduced support for anonymous functions.
Yeah. You are right. Now there is no error. But it does not work either.
By default, PHP does not pass arguments by reference; outsidefunc() does not actually do anything useful. If you want it to set $param in the caller to something else, and do not want to just return the new value, you could change the function signature to look like this:
function outsidefunc(&$param) {
You would also need to change the way you call the function, as call_user_func() does not allow you to pass arguments by reference. Either of these ways should work:
$outsideFunc($abc);
call_user_func_array($outsideFunc, array(&$abc));
Why not pass your function as an argument?
<?php
class someClass {
public $somevar="Me";
public function echoarg($abc,$cb=null) {
if( $cb) $cb($abc);
echo $abc;
}
}
$someClass = new someClass();
$someClass->echoarg($someClass->somevar,function(&$a) {$a = "I am ".$a;});
i am not sure what exactly you are looking for, but what i get is, you want to pass object in a function which can be acheive by
Type Hinting in PHP.
class MyClass {
public $var = 'Hello World';
}
function myFunction(MyClass $foo) {
echo $foo->var;
}
$myclass = new MyClass;
myFunction($myclass);
OP, perhaps closures are what you're looking for?
It doesn't do EXACTLY what you're looking for (actually add function to class), but can be added to a class variable and executed like any normal anonymous function.
$myClass->addFunc(function($arg) { return 'test: ' . $arg });
$myClass->execFunc(0);
class myClass {
protected $funcs;
public function addFunc(closure $func) {
$this->funcs[] = $func;
}
public function execFunc($index) { $this->funcs[$index](); } // obviously, do some checking here first.
}
I try to create some sort of setup class, like global values for the page.
The PHP-code
class globals
{
public $page;
public function __construct()
{
}
public function set_page($value)
{
$this->page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
}
class get
{
public function page()
{
$globals = new globals();
return $globals->page;
}
}
$globals = new globals();
$globals->set_page('My value');
echo get::page(); // Short function to be in a template
Question
My class forget the value I set. Why is that?
Do I have to use global variables?
Is this the correct approach for the problem?
The variable is set on an object, not on a class.
For each class, you can instantiate multiple objects. Each of those have their own variable scope.
Edit:
I forgot to include the easiest, and least verbose solution to your problem. AFAIK, you're looking for a way to check what page you're on. Constants will do just that:
defined('MY_CURRENT_PAGE') || define('MY_CURRENT_PAGE','My Value');
//use anywhere like so:
echo 'Currently on page: '.MY_CURRENT_PAGE;
My class forget the value I set. Why is that?
Quite simple: your page member function isn't static, yet you call it as though it is: get::page(). Even if you were to fix this, you're creating a new instance in the page method, but you're not preserving a reference too it anywhere, so each page call will create a new globals instance, that has nothing set.
Do I have to use global variables?
No, unless you're Really desperate, never use globals
Is this the correct approach for the problem?
No, if it doesn't work, it's not correct (IMHO).
Well, what is, you might ask. There are several ways to go about this:
class globals
{
public static $page = null;//make this static, meaning all instances will share this var
public function set_page($value)
{
self::$page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
}
class get
{
private $_globalsInstance = null;
public function __construct(globals $instance = null)
{
$this->_globalsInstance = $instance;
}
private function _getGlobals()
{
if (!$this->_globalsInstance instanceof globals)
{
$this->_globalsInstance = new globals();
}
return $this->_globalsInstance;
}
public function page()
{
return $this->_getGlobals()::$page;
}
}
Personally, however, I wouldn't work like this, I'd just pass my instances to wherever I need them (as arguments to functions/methods or just instantiate them in a scope that will be accessible:
class globals
{
public $page = null;//make this static, meaning all instances will share this var
public function set_page($value)
{
$this->page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
}
$page = new globals();
$page->set_page('foobar');
someFunction($page);
$someObject->renderPage($page);
require_once('specificScript.php');
//inside required script:
echo $page->page;
Do I have to use global variables?
Not, if your can use PHP 5.3
Is this the correct approach for the problem?
Better to use a generic class for this, or use static properties of objects
<?php
class globals
{
public static $page;
public function __construct()
{
}
public function set_page($value)
{
self::$page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
}
class get
{
public static function page()
{
return globals::$page;
}
}
$globals = new globals();
$globals->set_page('My value');
echo get::page(); // Short function to be in a template
P.S.
But this is not a nice approach
$globals there
class get
{
public function page()
{
$globals = new globals();
return $globals->page;
}
}
and there
$globals = new globals();
$globals->set_page('My value');
are different inctances of globals class.
One of the solutions is to make $page var static
public static $page;
I hope this helps
UPD:
Also you might apply Singleton to globals class and request for its insnance instead of creating new one directly:
globals::getInstance()->setPage('Page');
and
return globals::getInstance()->getPage();
In this case $page doesn't have to be static.
I'm not sure the other answers are very clear. You have created 2 classes. As such they have different scopes. As writen you can't access the original variable $page from the get class because it's outside the scope. Your page function in fact creates a new version of the object $globals without $page set. Normally you would place both your set and get functions in the initial object/class. Though it would be possible to use two class by calling the first class from the second and setting the page. Why you would want to do that I'm not sure.
if I were writing the class it would look like this.
class globals
{
public $page;
public function __construct()
{
}
public function set_page($value)
{
$this->page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
public function get_page()
{
return $this->page;
}
}
Actually I would probably set page to private not public. As public I guess you don't need a get function.
for using methods of the class without object you must use static definition. but anyway you put value for one class object and try to get it from another...
Perhaps this will help you continue on your coarse:
class globals
{
public static $page;
public function set_page($value)
{
self::$page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
}
class get extends globals
{
public function page()
{
$globals = new globals();
return parent::$page;
}
}
$globals = new globals();
$globals->set_page('My value');
echo get::page();
?>