I found the exact match for what I'm looking for, it's kind of a relationship user interface, please see
http://www.corporationwiki.com/Ohio/Powell/nutrition-forum-sports-llc/50101823.aspx
Ho do I mimic that, I need to code a php aplication that retrieves relations from a database and displays them like that above, so that I have 1 (or many) center nodes, and several others around it pointing and linked to that node, displayed like that above.
Best Regards
PS: I will need to add and remove nodes "on the fly" live, like with jquery and ajax/json calls.
I see I was voted down, I'm sorry if this is not the place to ask this I will gladly retract my question. Can you then please be so kind to point me the place where to ask for this type of information instead of voting me down on my first question ever here?
Here are some suggestions, although the get more specific the comments above still apply.
Start with a simple test case, with just one centre node and a few child nodes. If something works in an easy case, move on to the next level of complexity and so on.
Whatever you try, expect the esthetics/clarity of your graph to break down when you reach a certain level of compexity - nodes will overlap, not appear where you want them, etc., so don't expect too much.
Look for a library that would help. In flash, several graph layouts must have been implemeted before. In Javascript too, there are drawing panel libraries, or you could use a library for SVG or... Look for something that suits. As a comment above says, PHP is probably not it.
Neo4J (Graph Database) is implemented in Java and should be capable of what you show in the image. I haven't had an opportunity to use it for anything, but it looks powerful, simple, and is open source (with good documentation).
Also, try doing a search for Relationship Mapping and you may find what your looking for.
I recommend GraphViz for drawing static boxes and connecting them with arrow-headed lines. It has a very simple script (the shortest one is: "start -> stop", self-explanatory).
Some years ago I've made an XML file tree visualizer in PHP:.
As the figure shown, there's some kind of HTML table-like feature to draw a node. See GraphViz Gallery for some more exciting examples.
Update: As I mentioned, it's only for static, but you can make an app very quickly which displays the stuff. I've used my XML visualizer to make drawings for documentation.
Related
Ok, so my company has a client that has an interface for posting content - standard MySQL database, PHP-based, etc.
Anyway, they've continually had an intern or someone, post content to this interface straight from an MS Word doc - the interface is coded poorly, and takes this input as is, with no formatting.
My company has now been contracted out to fix this particular problem, as it is continually breaking their site, and my company has repeatedly had to manually go into the database, and delete the offending values.
Is there a quick and easy way to do this, or am I going to have to just do a replace operation on each offending character?
I see htmlentities() may be a partial solution - but as far as I know, that won't remove everything.
What's a good solution to this problem? Is there anything out there to make this easier?
We're also considering writing a content validator as well, probably just server-side (though maybe client-side, if my week is going slowly enough/I finish the rest of this quickly enough).
It depends on how many clients (or potential clients) you are supporting and how much time you have to invest. Options
Write your own function to strip out the metadata
Teach your clients to remove it themselves such as paste in notepad first,
or supply a knowledge base article to explain how to do it in the software. Perhaps a "Help" section or icon they can click on.
htttp://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;223396
Use a WYSIWYG editor such as TinyMCE which has built in functionality to remove it
But like I said in the comments, unless you are using your own function, prepare for clients to continue to paste directly and wonder why there is a problem.
I have a client who wants me to do CSS coding only, but doesn't want to give me the php files.
Right now, I just have access to the live website (with no CSS).
It is entirely made with tables and I want to use divs instead
I'm not sure if it is possible to do the coding
I thought about copying and pasting the generated HTML code from each page
Will this cause possible problems with the end result?
Yes, this will cause huge problems: you'll do an awesome job, client will have trouble integrating it with their site, client will abandon your awesome work.
IMO, you should let the client know that you'll do the best you can with what they have given you, but you would be able to save them a lot of work and do a better job if you could have access to the source code.
If you know that you can't make the client happy with what they have given you, though, it would be doing everyone a disservice for you to try.
If you absolutely can't convince them to give you access to the source, then this client sounds stupid:
He has a layout which is table based.
He wants you to magically make it look better with CSS, without having access to the source.
"#Phoenix I don't see any classes or IDs." - there are no classes or ids to hook into.
You might be able to do it if you used some CSS3 selectors to, for example, select the 3rd td inside a td inside the 2nd table to apply styles to ;)
But, that won't help if you have to support older browsers, which makes this impossible at the moment without doing something differently.
I don't have full knowledge of your situation, but here's what I would probably do (if I couldn't convince them to give me access to the source):
Open the live site.
Copy the HTML source code.
Paste it into a new local file.
Add this into the <head> section: <base href="http://the-clients-site.com/" />.
This will let all the assets on the page load from the client's actual site.
Now, you have something to work with.
You have to keep track of ALL changes you make to the file.
The first change should be adding your own blank style tag.
Then, you can add id and class to whichever elements you feel need it.
You should try to avoid moving around elements, unless it's absolutely required. Those changes are a whole lot harder to explain to someone. I know from experience.
You should be able to style the page properly now.
Then, you deliver the completed page, and the documented list of changes you had to make to the HTML (add id, here add class there).
The client should then be able to integrate the changes into his site.
Well, at a bare minimum they'll need to modify ther PHP to reference your CSS. More importantly, you need to be able to hook your CS up to elements - Do tables/rows/etc. have Ids or classes attached?
If they are clever and have some good separation between code and presentation (using a templating engine or similar) then you can probably just edit the template / css.
If they won't let you edit the PHP and you come up with a new awesome layout, they will have a nightmare job trying to integrate it and probably won't bother.
I don't see the problem. You can style tables just as easily as divs. You don't have to know how the wall is built to know how to paint it, which is pretty much all you've been hired to do. Only problem I could see would be if they haven't added any classes or ids to the elements yet. After all, what the browser/client sees is the only thing that needs styling, and since you can see everything that the browser sees, you can see everything that needs styling.
If they have added classes/ids, then just take a copy of a page and style it in a testing area, and then once it looks nice, you take a copy of another page and make sure it looks nice with it too, add to the CSS if there are any new unstyled elements that didn't exist on the first page, once it looks nice, then move on to another page, and another repeating the process until you are satisfied that it appears that every page within reason would look nice with it.
If they haven't added classes/ids, tell them they need to in some capacity before you can work on it, perhaps provide some guidance on the issue.
I'm actually doing this right now for SO.
I'm working on a userscript that provides an alternate "clean" stylesheet for the StackExchange network. I have no access to the SO engine. I am using the Chrome Inspector to look at how the elements are set up. I recommend the same. (Although it is a little different, since I'm modifying the original CSS file.)
You can easily identify what you want to style with the Inspector and then work from there. I would suggest that you ask your client for a list of classes and IDs though. (I got that in the form of an existing stylesheet, you can go about it in a different way, if that suits you and your client.)
I am building a web application in which the user may add a page, edit the layout, drag drop element, resize element, format the text, edit the element attribute etc.
In the page the user may include (retrieve) dynamic data, like maybe data from database, data generated by php code, etc.
I have played around with cakephp and jquery lately and tried to build this app. But I stumbled upon on how to appropriately display the php code. I tried to look into the cakephp core code and find about output buffering and tried to utilize output buffering to parse the php code and use regex to display it but it is more likely to reinvent the wheel if I write the parser my self
What I am asking is:
Ok, to be more simple and specific I just want to ask, how to save and load the page that was created by the user especially if the page contains php code. I just want to know is there any other method than write my own parser or maybe a library to parse a php code?
Ok that's all for now, does anyone have any idea how to implement it? Or maybe any page / website that could be useful to take some reference from? Maybe a sample code from which I can take some reference
Thanks
I'm not sure you'll find any good answer here about that.
Whoa I don't know where to start. I'll start by the number 3. You want widgets. Then that means you have to create widget class or objects that possesses a template or something that makes them drawable "well, kinda". If I were you it would be loaded from javascript and not really from php. Each widget would be in some way individual applications loaded in a div using javascript.
Point 2, You wanted widgets. When you add widgets to your page, you have to save some informations, like Position, Title, dimensions and so on. You may even save creation parameters. For exemple a ListWidget may be started with different ItemProvider. That way you don't have to write 1000 widgets but only one that shows different content. That said you have widgets, dimension and position. Now that lead us to point 1.
Point 1. Once you have your widgets, position and dimensions, you send the data you used to create them associated with the page to the server. That lead us two point 2 again.
Once you have saved a page. You can see it by retrieving all widgets with parameters and so on. That leaves you 2 options.
Generate Javascript that will recreate the saved widgets.
Generate Html will all the widgets.
Option 1 is simpler since option 2 won't bind html to javascript by itself. Solution 2 on the other hand is better since there is only 1 request to the server.
Oh and a last thing, You should set yourself some limits. That kind of thing can get very complicated and unfortunately not that great. See drupal for example. It does lots of cool stuff but as soon as you install lots of module. Drupal transform itself in some sort of memory eating monster. And almost all the time you don't really need that much of dynamic content. Fixed layouts will do work nice almost 99% of the time.
I'm also forced to say that but if you try to create an application that give users as much power as a scientist that could raise a 7 legged cat. I think you're going to play with really obscure forces!
I'm trying to write a text parser with PHP, like Instapaper did. What I want to do is; get a webpage and parse it in text-only mode.
It's simple to get the webpage with cURL and strip HTML tags. But every webpage have some common areas; like header, navigation, sidebar, footer, banners etc. I only want to get the article in text mode and exclude all other parts. It's also simple to exclude those parts if I know the "id" or "class" info. But I'm trying to automatize this process and apply for any page, like Instapaper.
I get all the content between but I don't know how to exclude header, sidebar or footer and get only the main article body. I have to develop a logic to get only the main article part.
It's not important for me to find the exact code. It would also be useful to understand how to exclude unnecessary parts as I can try to write my own code with PHP. It would also be useful if there any examples in other languages.
Thanks for helping.
You might try looking at the algorithms behind this bookmarklet, readability - It's got a decent success rate for extracting content among on all web page rubbish.
Friend of mine made it, that's why I'm recommending it - since I know it works, and I'm aware of the many techniques he's using to parse the data. You could apply these techniques for what your asking.
you can take a look at the source from Goose -> it already does alot of this like instapaper text extractions
https://github.com/jiminoc/goose/wiki
Have a look at the ExtractContent code from Shuyo Nakatani.
See original Ruby source http://rubyforge.org/projects/extractcontent/ or a port of it to Perl http://metacpan.org/pod/HTML::ExtractContent
You really should consider using a HTML parser for this. Gather similar pages and compare the DOM trees to find the differing nodes.
this article provides a comparison of different approaches. the java library boilerpipe was rated highly. at the boilerpipe site you find his scientific paper which compares to other algorithms.
not all algorithms suite all purposes. the biggest application of such tools is to just get the raw text to index as a search engine. the idea being that you don't want search results to be messed up by adverts. such extractions can be destructive; meaning that it wont give you "the best reading area" which is what people want with instapaper or readability.
I am going to start working on a website that has already been built by someone else.
The main script was bought and then adjusted by the lead programmer. The lead has left and I am the only programmer.
Never met the lead and there are no papers, documentation or comments in the code to help me out, also there are many functions with single letter names. There are also parts of the code that are all compressed in one line (like where there should be 200 lines there is one).
There are a few hundred files.
My questions are:
Does anyone have any advice on how to understand this system?
Has anyone had any similar experiences?
Does anyone have a quick way of decompressing the lines?
Please help me out here. This is my first big break and I really want this to work out well.
Thanks
EDIT:
On regards to the question:
- Does anyone have a quick way of decompressing the lines?
I just used notepad++ (extended replace) and netbeans (the format option) to change a file from 1696 lines to 5584!!
This is going to be a loooonnngggg project
For reformatting the source, try this online pretty-printer: http://www.prettyprinter.de/
For understanding the HTML and CSS, use Firebug.
For understanding the PHP code, step through it in a debugger. (I can't personally recommend a PHP debugger, but I've heard good things about Komodo.)
Start by checking the whole thing into source control, if you haven't already, and then as you work out what the various functions and variables do, rename them to something sensible and check in your changes.
If you can cobble together some rough regression tests (eg. with Selenium) before you start then you can be reasonably sure you aren't breaking anything as you go.
Ouch! I feel your pain!
A few things to get started:
If you're not using source control, don't do anything else until you get that set up. As you hack away at the files, you need to be able to revert to previous, presumably-working versions. Which source-control system you use isn't as important as using one. Subversion is easy and widely used.
Get an editor with a good PHP syntax highlighter and code folder. Which one is largely down to platform and personal taste; I like JEdit and Notepad++. These will help you navigate the code within a page. JEdit's folder is the best around. Notepad++ has a cool feature that when you highlight a word it highlights the other occurrences in the same file, so you can easily see e.g. where a tag begins, or where a variable is used.
Unwind those long lines by search-and-replace ';' with ';\n' -- at least you'll get every statement on a line of its own. The pretty-printer mentioned above will do the same plus indent. But I find that going in and indenting the code manually is a nice way to start to get familiar with it.
Analyze the website's major use cases and trace each one. If you're a front-end guy, this might be easier if you start from the front-end and work your way back to the DB; if you're a back-end guy, start with the DB and see what talks to it, and then how that's used to render pages -- either way works. Use FireBug in Firefox to inspect e.g. forms to see what names the fields take and what page they post to. Look at the PHP page to see what happens next. Use some echo() statements to print out the values of variables at various places. Finally, crack open the DB and get familiar with its schema.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
Good luck!
Could you get a copy of the original script version which was bought? It might be that that is documented. You could then use a comparison tool like Beyond Compare in order to extract any modifications that have been made.
If the functions names are only one letter it could be that the code is encoded with some kind of tool (I think Zend had a tool like that - Zend Encoder?) so that people cannot copy it. You should try to find an unencoded version, if there is one because that would save a lot of time.