I think example will be much better than loooong description :)
Let's assume we have an array of arrays:
("Server1", "Server_1", "Main Server", "192.168.0.3")
("Server_1", "VIP Server", "Main Server")
("Server_2", "192.168.0.4")
("192.168.0.3", "192.168.0.5")
("Server_2", "Backup")
Each line contains strings which are synonyms. And as a result of processing of this array I want to get this:
("Server1", "Server_1", "Main Server", "192.168.0.3", "VIP Server", "192.168.0.5")
("Server_2", "192.168.0.4", "Backup")
So I think I need a kind of recursive algorithm. Programming language actually doesn't matter — I need only a little help with idea in general. I'm going to use php or python.
Thank you!
This problem can be reduced to a problem in graph theory where you find all groups of connected nodes in a graph.
An efficient way to solve this problem is doing a "flood fill" algorithm, which is essentially a recursive breath first search. This wikipedia entry describes the flood fill algorithm and how it applies to solving the problem of finding connected regions of a graph.
To see how the original question can be made into a question on graphs: make each entry (e.g. "Server1", "Server_1", etc.) a node on a graph. Connect nodes with edges if and only if they are synonyms. A matrix data structure is particularly appropriate for keeping track of the edges, provided you have enough memory. Otherwise a sparse data structure like a map will work, especially since the number of synonyms will likely be limited.
Server1 is Node #0
Server_1 is Node #1
Server_2 is Node #2
Then edge[0][1] = edge[1][0] = 1, indicated that there is an edge between nodes #0 and #1 ( which means that they are synonyms ). While edge[0][2] = edge[2][0] = 0, indicating that Server1 and Server_2 are not synonyms.
Complexity Analysis
Creating this data structure is pretty efficient because a single linear pass with a lookup of the mapping of strings to node numbers is enough to crate it. If you store the mapping of strings to node numbers in a dictionary then this would be a O(n log n) step.
Doing the flood fill is O(n), you only visit each node in the graph once. So, the algorithm in all is O(n log n).
Introduce integer marking, which indicates synonym groups. On start one marks all words with different marks from 1 to N.
Then search trough your collection and if you find two words with indexes i and j are synonym, then remark all of words with marking i and j with lesser number of both. After N iteration you get all groups of synonyms.
It is some dirty and not throughly efficient solution, I believe one can get more performance with union-find structures.
Edit: This probably is NOT the most efficient way of solving your problem. If you are interested in max performance (e.g., if you have millions of values), you might be interested in writing more complex algorithm.
PHP, seems to be working (at least with data from given example):
$data = array(
array("Server1", "Server_1", "Main Server", "192.168.0.3"),
array("Server_1", "VIP Server", "Main Server"),
array("Server_2", "192.168.0.4"),
array("192.168.0.3", "192.168.0.5"),
array("Server_2", "Backup"),
);
do {
$foundSynonyms = false;
foreach ( $data as $firstKey => $firstValue ) {
foreach ( $data as $secondKey => $secondValue ) {
if ( $firstKey === $secondKey ) {
continue;
}
if ( array_intersect($firstValue, $secondValue) ) {
$data[$firstKey] = array_unique(array_merge($firstValue, $secondValue));
unset($data[$secondKey]);
$foundSynonyms = true;
break 2; // outer foreach
}
}
}
} while ( $foundSynonyms );
print_r($data);
Output:
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[0] => Server1
[1] => Server_1
[2] => Main Server
[3] => 192.168.0.3
[4] => VIP Server
[6] => 192.168.0.5
)
[2] => Array
(
[0] => Server_2
[1] => 192.168.0.4
[3] => Backup
)
)
This would yield lower complexity then the PHP example (Python 3):
a = [set(("Server1", "Server_1", "Main Server", "192.168.0.3")),
set(("Server_1", "VIP Server", "Main Server")),
set(("Server_2", "192.168.0.4")),
set(("192.168.0.3", "192.168.0.5")),
set(("Server_2", "Backup"))]
b = {}
c = set()
for s in a:
full_s = s.copy()
for d in s:
if b.get(d):
full_s.update(b[d])
for d in full_s:
b[d] = full_s
c.add(frozenset(full_s))
for k,v in b.items():
fsv = frozenset(v)
if fsv in c:
print(list(fsv))
c.remove(fsv)
I was looking for a solution in python, so I came up with this solution. If you are willing to use python data structures like sets
you can use this solution too. "It's so simple a cave man can use it."
Simply this is the logic behind it.
foreach set_of_values in value_collection:
alreadyInSynonymSet = false
foreach synonym_set in synonym_collection:
if set_of_values in synonym_set:
alreadyInSynonymSet = true
synonym_set = synonym_set.union(set_of_values)
if not alreadyInSynonymSet:
synonym_collection.append(set(set_of_values))
vals = (
("Server1", "Server_1", "Main Server", "192.168.0.3"),
("Server_1", "VIP Server", "Main Server"),
("Server_2", "192.168.0.4"),
("192.168.0.3", "192.168.0.5"),
("Server_2", "Backup"),
)
value_sets = (set(value_tup) for value_tup in vals)
synonym_collection = []
for value_set in value_sets:
isConnected = False # If connected to a term in the graph
print(f'\nCurrent Value Set: {value_set}')
for synonyms in synonym_collection:
# IF two sets are disjoint, they don't have common elements
if not set(synonyms).isdisjoint(value_set):
isConnected = True
synonyms |= value_set # Appending elements of new value_set to synonymous set
break
# If it's not related to any other term, create a new set
if not isConnected:
print ('Value set not in graph, adding to graph...')
synonym_collection.append(value_set)
print('\nDone, Completed Graphing Synonyms')
print(synonym_collection)
This will have a result of
Current Value Set: {'Server1', 'Main Server', '192.168.0.3', 'Server_1'}
Value set not in graph, adding to graph...
Current Value Set: {'VIP Server', 'Main Server', 'Server_1'}
Current Value Set: {'192.168.0.4', 'Server_2'}
Value set not in graph, adding to graph...
Current Value Set: {'192.168.0.3', '192.168.0.5'}
Current Value Set: {'Server_2', 'Backup'}
Done, Completed Graphing Synonyms
[{'VIP Server', 'Main Server', '192.168.0.3', '192.168.0.5', 'Server1', 'Server_1'}, {'192.168.0.4', 'Server_2', 'Backup'}]
Related
Up until yesterday I had a perfectly working budget organizer site/app working with iGoogle.
Through PHP, using the following little line
file_get_contents('http://www.google.com/ig/calculator?hl=en&q=1usd=?eur');
and similar I was able to get all I needed.
As of today, this is no longer working. When I looked into the issue, what has happened is that Google has retired iGoogle. Bummer!
Anyway, I was looking around elsewhere but I can't find anything that fits my needs. I would REALLY love to just fix it and get it running again by just switching this one line of code (i.e. changing the Google address with the address of some other currency API available) but it seems like none does.
The API from rate-exchange.appspot.com seems like it could be a iGoogle analog but, alas, it never works. I keep getting an "Over Quota" message.
(Here comes an initial question: anybody out there know of a simple, reliable, iGoogle-sort API?)
So I guess the natural thing would be to the Yahoo YQL feature (at least I suppose it is as reliable).
Yahoo's queries look like this:
http://query.yahooapis.com/v1/public/yql?q=select * from yahoo.finance.xchange where pair in ("USDEUR", "USDJPY", "USDBGN")&env=store://datatables.org/alltableswithkeys
What I really can't figure out is how to parse this data. It outputs an XML.
What I used to have is this:
function exchange($inputAmount,$inputCurrency,$outputCurrency) {
$exchange = file_get_contents('http://www.google.com/ig/calculator?hl=en&q='.$inputAmount.$inputCurrency.'=?'.$outputCurrency);
$exchange = explode('"', $exchange);
$exchange = explode('.', $exchange['3']);
$exchange[0] = str_replace(" ", "",preg_replace('/\D/', '', $exchange[0]));
if(isset($exchange[1])){
$exchange[1] = str_replace(" ", "",preg_replace('/\D/', '', $exchange[1]));
$exchange = $exchange[0].".".$exchange[1];
} else{
$exchange = $exchange[0];
}
return $exchange;
}
So the user was able to get the exchange rate from an input currency such as "USD" and an output currency such as "EUR" on a specific amount of money. As I said, this was working swimmingly up until yesterday night.
Any ideas?
Never mind! Solved it!
For anyone interested, here's what I did to get my code to work (with the least chnges possible) with the Yahoo YQL:
// ** GET EXCHANGE INFO FROM YAHOO YQL ** //
$url = 'http://query.yahooapis.com/v1/public/yql?q=select * from yahoo.finance.xchange where pair in ("USDEUR", "EURUSD")&env=store://datatables.org/alltableswithkeys'; //<-- Get the YQL info from Yahoo (here I'm only interested in converting from USD to EUR and vice-versa; you should add all conversion pairs you need).
$xml = simplexml_load_file($url) or die("Exchange feed not loading!"); //<-- Load the XML file into PHP variable.
$exchange = array(); //<-- Build an array to hold the data we need.
for($i=0; $i<2; $i++): //<-- For loop to get data specific to each exchange pair (you should change 2 to the actual amount of pairs you're querying for).
$name = (string)$xml->results->rate[$i]->Name; //<-- Get the name of the pair and turn it into a string (this looks like this: "USD to EUR").
$rate = (string)$xml->results->rate[$i]->Rate; //<-- Do the same for the actual rate resulting from the conversion.
$exchange[$name] = $rate; //<-- Put the data pairs into the array.
endfor; //<-- End for loop. :)
// ** WORK WITH EXCHANGE INFO ** //
$toeur = array( //<-- Create new array specific for conversion to one of the units needed.
'usd' => $exchange['USD to EUR'], //<-- Create an array key for each unit used. In this case, in order to get the conversion of USD to EUR I ask for it from my $exchange array with the pair Name.
'eur' => 1); //<-- The way I coded the app, I found it more practical to also create a conversion for the unit into itself and simply use a 1, which translates into "do not convert"
$tousd = array(
'eur' => $exchange['EUR to USD'],
'usd' => 1);
This is basically all you need to get all the exchange info you want. After that, you use it all something like this:
amount*$toxxx['coin'];
So, say I wanted to know how many Euro is 100 USD right now:
100*$toeur['usd'];
Piece of cake!
Still a very useful solution by QuestionerNo27. Since early 2015, however, Yahoo YQL apparently slightly changed the XML output of their api. 'Name' now no longer translates into a string like 'USD to EUR', but to 'USD/EUR' and should in the code above be referenced this way:
$toeur = array(
'usd' => $exchange['USD/EUR']
instead of
$toeur = array(
'usd' => $exchange['USD to EUR']
and in a similar fashion for other currency conversions.
I created a routine to convert the currency based on #QuestionerNo27 http://jamhubsoftware.com/geoip/currencyconvertor.php?fromcur=USD&tocur=EUR&amount=1 you can consume this
<?php
$fromcur = $_GET['fromcur'];
$tocur = $_GET['tocur'];
$amt = $_GET['amount'];
// ** GET EXCHANGE INFO FROM YAHOO YQL ** //
$url = 'http://query.yahooapis.com/v1/public/yql?q=select * from yahoo.finance.xchange where pair in ("'.$fromcur.$tocur.'")&env=store://datatables.org/alltableswithkeys'; //<-- Get the YQL info from Yahoo (here I'm only interested in converting from USD to EUR and vice-versa; you should add all conversion pairs you need).
$xml = simplexml_load_file($url) or die("Exchange feed not loading!"); //<-- Load the XML file into PHP variable.
$exchange = array(); //<-- Build an array to hold the data we need.
for($i=0; $i<2; $i++): //<-- For loop to get data specific to each exchange pair (you should change 2 to the actual amount of pairs you're querying for).
$name = (string)$xml->results->rate[$i]->Name; //<-- Get the name of the pair and turn it into a string (this looks like this: "USD to EUR").
$rate = (string)$xml->results->rate[$i]->Rate; //<-- Do the same for the actual rate resulting from the conversion.
$exchange[$name] = $rate; //<-- Put the data pairs into the array.
endfor; //<-- End for loop. :)
// ** WORK WITH EXCHANGE INFO ** //
$conv = $fromcur . '/' . $tocur;
$toeur = array( //<-- Create new array specific for conversion to one of the units needed.
$tocur => $amt*$exchange[$conv], //<-- Create an array key for each unit used. In this case, in order to get the conversion of USD to EUR I ask for it from my $exchange array with the pair Name.
$fromcur => $amt,
"ex_amt" =>$amt*$exchange[$conv]); //<-- The way I coded the app, I found it more practical to also create a conversion for the unit into itself and simply use a 1, which translates into "do not convert"
echo json_encode($toeur);
?>
I have an object which has a state property, for example state = 'state4' or state = 'state2'.
Now I also have an array of all available states that the state property can get, state1 to state8 (note: the states are not named stateN. They have eight different names, like payment or canceled. I just put stateN to describe the problem).
In addition to that, I have a logical expression like $expression = !state1||state4&&(!state2||state5) for example. This is the code for the above description:
$state = 'state4';
$expression = '!state1||state4&&(!state2||state5)';
Now I want to check if the logical expression is true or false. In the above case, it's true. In the following case it would be false:
$state = 'state1';
$expression = state4&&!state2||(!state1||state7);
How could this be solved in an elegant way?
//Initialize
$state = 'state4';
$expression = '!state1||state4&&(!state2||state5)';
//Adapt to your needs
$pattern='/state\d/';
//Replace
$e=str_replace($state,'true',$expression);
while (preg_match_all($pattern,$e,$matches)
$e=str_replace($matches[0],'false',$e);
//Eval
eval("\$result=$e;");
echo $result;
Edit:
Your update to the OQ necessitates some minor work:
//Initialize
$state = 'payed';
$expression = '!payed||cancelled&&(!whatever||shipped)';
//Adapt to your needs
$possiblestates=array(
'payed',
'cancelled',
'shipped',
'whatever'
);
//Replace
$e=str_replace($state,'true',$expression);
$e=str_replace($possiblestates,'false',$e);
//Eval
eval("\$result=$e;");
echo $result;
Edit 2
There has been concern about eval and PHP injection in the comments: The expression and the replacements are completly controlled by the application, no user input involved. As long as this holds, eval is safe.
I am using ExpressionLanguage, but there are few different solutions
ExpressionLanguage Symfony Component - https://symfony.com/doc/current/components/expression_language.html
cons - weird array syntax - array['key']. array.key works only for objects
cons - generate notice for array['key'] when key is not defined
pros - stable and well maintainer
https://github.com/mossadal/math-parser
https://github.com/optimistex/math-expression
Please remember that eval is NOT an option, under NO circumstances. We don't live an a static world. Any software always grows and evolves. What was once considered a safe input an one point may turn completely unsafe and uncontrolled.
I think you have a case which can be solved if you model each of your expressions as a rooted directed acyclic graph (DAG).
I assumed acyclic since your ultimate aim is to find the result of boolean algebra operations (if cycling occur in any of graph, then it'd be nonsense I think).
However, even if your graph structure—meaningfully—can be cyclic then your target search term will be cyclic graph, and it should still have a solution.
$expression = '!state1||state4&&(!state2||state5)';
And you have one root with two sub_DAGs in your example.
EXPRESSION as a Rooted DAG:
EXPRESSION
|
AND
___/ \___
OR OR
/ \ / \
! S_1 S_4 ! S_2 S5
Your adjacency list is:
expression_adj_list = [
expression => [ subExp_1, subExp_2 ] ,
subExp_1 => [ ! S_1, S_4 ],
subExp_2 => [ ! S_2, S5 ]
]
Now you can walk through this graph by BFS (breadth-first search algorithm) or DFS (depth-first search algorithm) or your custom, adjusted algorithm.
Of course you can just visit the adjacency list with keys and values as many times as you need if this suits and is easier for you.
You'll need a lookup table to teach your algorithm that. For example,
S2 && S5 = 1,
S1 or S4 = 0,
S3 && S7 = -1 (to throw an exception maybe)
After all, the algorithm below can solve your expression's result.
$adj_list = convert_expression_to_adj_list();
// can also be assigned by a function.
// root is the only node which has no incoming-edge in $adj_list.
$root = 'EXPRESSION';
q[] = $root; //queue to have expression & subexpressions
$results = [];
while ( ! empty(q)) {
$current = array_shift($q);
if ( ! in_array($current, $results)) {
if (isset($adj_list[$current])) { // if has children (sub/expression)
$children = $adj_list[$current];
// true if all children are states. false if any child is subexpression.
$bool = is_calculateable($children);
if ($bool) {
$results[$current] = calc($children);
}
else {
array_unshift($q, $current);
}
foreach ($children as $child) {
if (is_subexpresssion($child) && ! in_array($child, $results)) {
array_unshift($q, $child);
}
}
}
}
}
return $results[$root];
This approach has a great advantage also: if you save the results of the expressions in your database, if an expression is a child of the root expression then you won't need to recalculate it, just use the result from the database for the child subexpressions. In this way, you always have a two-level depth DAG (root and its children).
I'm building my own personal CMS right now with PHP and MySql and I'm not sure of the best way to store site-wide variables such as the site name. What would be the proper way? (If you could provide a brief explanation that would be really nice too. ;)
EDIT: The variables would need to be editable from within the CMS.
In my opinion the best way is to store it in a config file (I use .ini files, but you could easily use a file like below).
I prefer this to storing it in a MySQL database, as it allows you to still get variables (like site name, or admin email address) even if the database is down
<?php
define('SITE_NAME','My CMS');
define('SITE_URL','http://www.example.com');
define('ADMIN_EMAIL','admin#example.com');
?>
EDIT:
Create a table like this
id key value
-------------------
1 name My Cms
2 url http://www.example.com
And access it like this (at the top of every page)
<?php
$config = array();
$query = mysql_query('SELECT * FROM config');
while ($row = mysql_fetch_row($query)) {
$key = $row['key'];
$value = $row['value'];
$config[$key] = $value;
}
echo $config['name'];
?>
There is no "best" sollution for all purposes.
Here are some examples how you can do this:
Simple PHP file:
This sollution is very simple but not very flexible:
you just 'define' constants:
define('SITE_NAME', 'all about Foo');
define ('ADMIN_NAME', 'The Dude');
define ('ADMIN_MAIL', 'dude#foo.com');
Pro: very very simple.
Cons: changes require that you edit the code. Only flat keys (no tree/registry)
ini File
PHP comes with functions to parse ini files. Here is an example rom the php manual:
; This is a sample configuration file
; Comments start with ';', as in php.ini
[first_section]
one = 1
five = 5
animal = BIRD
[second_section]
path = "/usr/local/bin"
URL = "http://www.example.com/~username"
[third_section]
phpversion[] = "5.0"
phpversion[] = "5.1"
phpversion[] = "5.2"
phpversion[] = "5.3"
you can parse this in a multi dimensional array:
$ini_array = parse_ini_file("sample.ini", true);
print_r($ini_array);
Will output:
Array
(
[first_section] => Array
(
[one] => 1
[five] => 5
[animal] => Dodo bird
)
[second_section] => Array
(
[path] => /usr/local/bin
[URL] => http://www.example.com/~username
)
[third_section] => Array
(
[phpversion] => Array
(
[0] => 5.0
[1] => 5.1
[2] => 5.2
[3] => 5.3
)
)
)
Pros: lexible. A well known standart syntax.
Cons: Hard to edit in backend
See: http://php.net/manual/de/function.parse-ini-file.php
Simple SQL
Another simple aproach, but this uses a database to store the conig keys.
The table structure is:
config{config_name UNIQUE KEY VARCHAR[64] ; config_value VARCHAR[128]}
This is only pseudo code and i you need more information about PHP and SQL feel free to google it.
SQL Tree
Allows you to create a tree like structure. To archive this you use the same table structure but include '/' in your key names:
admin/name | 'The Dude'
admin/mail | 'dude#foo.com'
Then you load your COMPLETE config in an array and parse it:
function parseRawConfig($rawConfig){
$result = array();
foreach($rawConfig as $key => $value){
$nodeNames = explode('/',$key);
$nodeCount = count($nodes);
$node = $result;
for($i=1;$i<$nodeCount;$i++){
if(!array_key_exists($nodeNames[$i],$node)){
$node[$nodeNames[$i]] = array();
}
}
$node[$nodeNames[$nodeCount-1]] = $value;
}
return $result;
}
Then you can access your keys like this:
echo $config['admin']['mail'];
This makes it easy to generate a nice tree view for your backend, but to save the changes you will have to 'reconstruct' the original path.
Pro: structured hierarchical data.
Con: Complicated, hard to implement, requires db connection
XML
Write all your conig settings in a xml file.
You can either use a app specific xml or a generic registry like style:
<cmsConf>
<site>all about foo</site>
<admin>
<name>The Dude</name>
<mail>dude#foo.com</mail>
</admin>
</cmsConf>
<reg>
<key name="site">all about foo</key>
<node name="admin">
<key name="name">The Dude</key>
<key name="mail">dude#foo.com</key>
</node>
</reg>
PHP provides plenty of classes and functions for reading/writting xml, and using xml makes it really easy to create interfaces to other applications.
The pros/cons of xml are a huge topic. To huge to sum them up in a few sentences.
IMPORTANT
These are just some very simple examples and if you choose one I recommend you dig deeper into the topic!
My fav is XML ;)
a configuration file in whatever format you like.
I usually create one table with all config variables. Every column will get a clear name of what its setting means. Then I use the following query to store it in a single array for easy use.
<?php
$result = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM configtable WHERE siteID=$siteID LIMIT 1");
$siteConfig = mysql_fetch_assoc($result);
?>
This way it is very easy to add new config parameters, you only need to add a column to the configtable and you can directly use the value in your site. Plus you only have one variable so an accidental reuse of a config variable wont happen.
I have this sphinx search engine that I use through Zend using sphinxapi.php . It works fantastic. Really really great.
However, there is one problem: It randomly fails.
// Prepare Sphinx search
$sphinxClient = new SphinxClient();
$sphinxClient->SetServer($ip, $port);
$sphinxClient->SetConnectTimeout( 10 );
$sphinxClient->SetMatchMode( SPH_MATCH_ANY );
$sphinxClient->SetLimits( $resultsPerPage * ($nPage - 1), $resultsPerPage );
$sphinxClient->SetArrayResult( true );
$query = array();
$query['lang'] = '#lang "lang' . $language . '"';
if (isset($params)) {
foreach ($params as $param) {
$query['tags'] = '#tags "' . $param . '"';
}
}
// Make the Sphinx search
$sphinxClient->SetMatchMode(SPH_MATCH_EXTENDED);
$sphinxResult = $sphinxClient->Query(implode(' ', $query), '*');
As seen here, I search for a language and an arbitrary amount of tags, imploded into a single query string in the end (instead of making a battleload of subqueries).
So, normally, this works like a charm, but occassionally sphinx returns that it found 2000 entries in English and, say, 1000 entries with the tag "pictures" (or some other purely english word) but ZERO hits that fit both results, which is purely false. In fact, refreshing the page everything returns to normal with something like 800 real results.
My question is why does it do this and how do I make it stop?
Any ideas?
:Edit: Added shortened output log
[error] =>
[warning] =>
...
[total] => 0
[total_found] => 0
[time] => 0.000
[words] => Array (
[langen] => Array (
[docs] => 2700
[hits] => 2701 )
[picture] => Array (
[docs] => 829
[hits] => 1571 ) ) )
have you checked to see if the sphinx client is giving you any error or warning messages that may describe the failure?
if($sphinxResult === false) {
print "Query failed: " . $sphinxClient->GetLastError();
} else {
if($sphinxClient->GetLastWarning()) {
print "WARNING: " . $sphinxClient->GetLastWarning();
}
// process results
}
This issue has been solved completely a few months after the original post. The issue is that our service providers in the umbrella corporation har mistakenly assigned the wrong root values to the sphinx commands. The problem above was actually running on Sphinx 0.9.8 and was obviously buggy. My advice, if you ever experience similar problems is to double-tripple-check the version you use both to index and to query.
It feels like one of those times your math calculation doesn't roll out because you forgot a minus on the first row. Thanks to everyone that have tried to help in this and related threads.
I find print_r in PHP extremely useful, but wonder if there is anything remotely equivalent in Perl?
Note #tchrist recommends Data::Dump over Data::Dumper. I wasn't aware of it, but from the looks of it, seems like it's both far easier to use and producing better looking and easier to interpret results.
Data::Dumper :
A snippet of the examples shown in the above link.
use Data::Dumper;
package Foo;
sub new {bless {'a' => 1, 'b' => sub { return "foo" }}, $_[0]};
package Fuz; # a weird REF-REF-SCALAR object
sub new {bless \($_ = \ 'fu\'z'), $_[0]};
package main;
$foo = Foo->new;
$fuz = Fuz->new;
$boo = [ 1, [], "abcd", \*foo,
{1 => 'a', 023 => 'b', 0x45 => 'c'},
\\"p\q\'r", $foo, $fuz];
########
# simple usage
########
$bar = eval(Dumper($boo));
print($#) if $#;
print Dumper($boo), Dumper($bar); # pretty print (no array indices)
$Data::Dumper::Terse = 1; # don't output names where feasible
$Data::Dumper::Indent = 0; # turn off all pretty print
print Dumper($boo), "\n";
$Data::Dumper::Indent = 1; # mild pretty print
print Dumper($boo);
$Data::Dumper::Indent = 3; # pretty print with array indices
print Dumper($boo);
$Data::Dumper::Useqq = 1; # print strings in double quotes
print Dumper($boo);
As usually with Perl, you might prefer alternative solutions to the venerable Data::Dumper:
Data::Dump::Streamer has a terser output than Data::Dumper, and can also serialize some data better than Data::Dumper,
YAML (or Yaml::Syck, or an other YAML module) generate the data in YAML, which is quite legible.
And of course with the debugger, you can display any variable with the 'x' command. I particularly like the form 'x 2 $complex_structure' where 2 (or any number) tells the debugger to display only 2 levels of nested data.
An alternative to Data::Dumper that does not produce valid Perl code but instead a more skimmable format (same as the x command of the Perl debugger) is Dumpvalue. It also consumes a lot less memory.
As well, there is Data::Dump::Streamer, which is more accurate in various edge and corner cases than Data::Dumper is.
I use Data::Dump, it's output is a bit cleaner than Data::Dumper's (no $VAR1), it provides quick shortcuts and it also tries to DTRT, i.e. it will print to STDERR when called in void context and return the dump string when not.
I went looking for the same thing and found this lovely little Perl function, explicitly meant to generate results like print_r().
The author of the script was asking your exact question in a forum here.
print objectToString($json_data);
Gives this output:
HASH {
time => 1233173875
error => 0
node => HASH {
vid => 1011
moderate => 0
field_datestring => ARRAY {
HASH {
value => August 30, 1979
}
}
field_tagged_persons => ARRAY {
HASH {
nid => undef
}
}
...and so on...