Mysql php class recommendation - php

I have been using ezSQL for the last few years but feel it is outdated. Though I like the simplicity and I like the file based caching ability with json, for small result sets that is.
So starting a new project I was looking for suggestions on a better mysql class for php. I know the db will only be mysql so portability is not a requirement. I read about mysqli extension, pdo etc but just dont know which one would be best for my situation. The site does a lot more reads than writes, though there are times where there are a lot of writes in the admin tool to the db. I looked at doctrine but dont know if that is too "bloated" for what I need. Hopefully this isnt to vague. Any suggestions?
EDIT
The site isnt small, I would consider it a high traffic site with a lot of db queries.

What don't you like about ezSQL? I often wish there was something like it for other protocols/languages I encounter. Every syntax should be written like ezSQL, in my opinion.. It describes the operation to be performed, in as few words as is possible, in the clearest and most logical order. Do you actually have performance problems, or are you just worried that something better has come along? I agree that ezSQL is rarely mentioned, but I have yet to find anything that matches it's simplicity, conciseness, and function...

From what I know of ezSQL (via it's wordpress pendant) I would consider Doctrine as well as too much for the moment because it's a complete data mapper for the database whereas you might be more looking to how to move away from your recent use of ezSQL which I think is a good idea.
Bascially you might be interested in a data-access abstraction layer. That could be PDO as it's build in into PHP. Even if you don't need to change the database server, it will give you defined interfaces how to query and access the data.
As you build the site from scratch, I can suggest you consider using some lightweight framework. A good introduction in my eyes is When Flat PHP meets Symfony which shows how a webapp can generally benefit from patterns and a flexible design.

From experience:
Doctrine - very easy to use I love doctrine query language - I never had to do initial setup though so im not sure how hard it is. It has very good community and lots of tutorials.
Propel - used for a bit. Does the job, very similar to doctrine. However, the documentation is very crap and community is very slack. I found that when I didn't know something it was quite hard to find an answer and often I had to post on Google forums.
Note: If you are starting from scratch you might want to look at some of the frameworks such as symfony+doctrine is a good combination, makes development a lot easier.
Links:
- http://www.doctrine-project.org/
- http://www.propelorm.org/

Related

Starting a large PHP project. Is OOP necessary or is it just a preference?

I started learning PHP awhile ago. I guess I'm fairly okay in it. I want to write a Content Management System, just as a project for myself, however long it may take. To be more specific, a simple gaming CMS where users can log in, post clan statistics, post in a forum, have user profiles, upcoming matches etc, various other modules you can install or code yourself. It's been done before, but I feel like I would learn a lot by going through with this.
To the experienced coders:
What is required to undertake such a project?
Any framework preference?
Is OOP necessary?
Are there certain ways to go about making such a large-scale project?
I've heard of various frameworks like CakePHP, codeigniter, and Zend, but I'm not sure what I should make of it.
The most important step in any project is PLANNING.
Plan everything you can , database (tables , columns , relations) , process-flow and such on.
Nothing is necessary but OOP is recommended because:
You won't get lost in your own code
Easy to edit and to add (reflexable for changes)
Cakephp , codeigniter are frameworks and they will save you lot of development time.
Instead of writing classes for each type of models you have (posts , members ...)
you run a simple command and it will create a basic app for your needs.
From my personal experience so far i would suggest you (at least) try making the system on your own since the experience and knowledge gained throughout the process of creating complex systems is by far the best hands on practice you will ever get.
Whether to use a specific framework or not is particularly up to you and whether you feel up to the task of achieving the system development on your own, since using a framework would also require learning the specific framework as well.
For OOP i would highly recommend it since it makes everything a lot easier. If you've never worked with object oriented principles before, you might find it a bit challenging at the beginning, but once you get over the learning curve you'd be more than satisfied with the result, with what you've learned and how easy and organized your whole system will look, especially when you have to make small changes or updates.
Since we are talking about a relatively large system as you suggest, i personally cant stress enough, how important planning and analysis is. Try to write down in details all the data you will need, make drafts and plan your database tables as thorough as you can since if during the process you find out that you've forgotten something or something just doesn't feel right, you might have to recreate classes, databases etc. to make it all run smoothly.
OOP is in the end a matter of preference, but there are a few notable advantages. The very first one that comes to mind is security. Parametized queries with mysqli, which are designed to function in an OOP kind of way, transactions, if you will have any.
If you want CMS, then you will also probably have to display quite a lot of data from the database, which will require pagination. Instead of having to re-write a "procedural" pagination algorithm, you could approach everything with OOP with a single class.
Ultimately, it is still a matter of preference but as far as I know, oop comes with many many advantages in real world applications. Good luck with your project!
I'll just reiterate what's already been said here and say this: OOP is a utility, and never a requirement. I'm an OO person myself and I tend to think easier in those terms after having done it for years, but I don't think I've come up across more than a couple of things that I don't think I could have done without OO practices (one of which being a particle effects engine, which is kind of a given).
That being said, there are definitely times where OO is more a hindrance than an boon. What you need to do is sit down and really visualize your project as a whole. When you're looking at the big picture, do you see things as encapsulated objects? Will you have one block of code that you will be using lots of times over to describe things that are similar but slightly different? Or, is your project a bit more linear where you can see most of your scripts running in the traditional "top-down" format?
Well, the point of OOP is to make programming more similar with the real world. In the real world, you're dealing with objects. Your job is an object of class Job, you are an object of class Employee which extends the class Person, you go home to an object of class Apartment which is contained in an object of class Building, which is contained in an object of class Block.
My point is, the point of OOP is to make life easier for you, you can designate a forum post as an Object, as you can for users and whatnot. The whole structure of data you can create in OOP is far more complex, and easy to understand than procedural PHP.
Eventually, it's all in your preference, but yes, if you asked me whether I'd recommend you use OOP on a project of this scale, I would definitely say yes.
As for your other questions:
What is required to undertake such a project? - Planning, and lots of it. Plan ahead anything you might need (in terms of database, existing projects/classes, files, pages). Also plan in for extensibility, to add modules and tables in the future.
Any framework preference? - I'm not a huge fan of frameworks, but I suggest you do learn the concept of MVC and single point-of-entry.
i think framework will help you a lot.. i mean various repetitive task can be easily omitted
and for a large project OOP is highly recommended for simplicity without OOP your code will be very evil and very hard to maintain
You should first look for some good framework - working from beginning is quite difficult. You should first create some kind of block diagram of necessary parts of your application and corresponding database/tables.
OOP is recommended because it could save you a lot of time.
One good framework look here: http://code.google.com/p/phpstartapp/

DAL generator for php

Going from .Net to PHP because I want to explore the possibilities of the language I'm struggling to find some way to autogenerate a DAL. In .Net I'd just use visual studio to generate a datamodel, but how can I do that with PHP and MySQL, so I won't have to hand-type in all the classes? My current PHP IDE is Aptana.
You could use an ORM like Doctrine or Propel.
These feature autogeneration of classes from schema, and vice versa.
If you need to write your own access layer, I would reccomend using PHP Data Objects (PDO) as it provides a nice OO interface, and DB engine abstraction.
Normally I wouldn't write an answer, since you have 2 already, but I'd like to give you some insights of my own, giving the fact that Im a .NET and PHP developer and try to take advantge of both:
If you are looking for code generation powerful as Visual Studio, then look no more because in PHP I haven't found one yet and I've been looking for years. Visual Studio is just "huge"
To my understanding there is not such thing as .NET code style. I believe that most PHP frameworks / applications sacrifice much in the sake of "simplicity" and I think is just not right. Code should be extensible, maintainable and scalable in any framework/application you buid
Propel and Doctrine are outstanding for data mapping (ORM), much as NHibernate or Entity Framework in PHP, but remeber that you'll need a Data Access Layer and a Business Access Layer for a fully developed application to be scalable.
Keep in mind that PHP supports OO much like .NET, but differs in a few things, but well develop designs are meant for ANY language.
I think my answer has gone a bit away from the original question, but I liked to give you a bigger answer, since like you said, you wanted to:
...explore the possibilities of the
language...
And you need many opinions to form your own. Best of luck in you endevours and hope that my answer hasn't killed you of boredom! :)
PS: Should you like some more stuff on BLL and DAL using PHP, check out this article I wrote in my blog.
If you really want to jump into the idea behind PHP, and not just write .net style code in PHP, you need to move away from the Objects-all-over methods of .net.
As you've noticed, auto-generation of objects isn't common in PHP. Which means that the solution to the problem should not rely on this.
Try creating more generic objects and taking advantage of inheritance to avoid object bloat. And more-over try to rely less on data transfer objects and more on creating complete object-as-tool objects.
You'll find PHP to be much more of a joy to work with if you escape from the trappings of .net.
To put that in perspective, I don't think in the 5 years I have done work in PHP professionally, on big-scale projects like army.mil, have I ever felt the need to create a full-on DAL to get the job done.
The biggest project I've worked on just has a system of model classes each of which carry a list of methods that poll the database for raw data and then pass that data into the final objects. (in this case articles that make up the articles on army.mil)
There simply isn't a need for another layer between the model and the data in PHP. It almost always just means more work for no gain.
There are various reasons why they DO make sense in .net. Not the least of which being that they can be auto-generated trivially and therefore there is almost no time cost in having them.
That said, when encapsulated within the confines of a framework, DAL begins to make sense again. If your project is basic, I would suggest a framework like CodeIgniter. CI contains a really nice database abstraction system. It forgoes SQL in favor of methods that transform into whatever the particular database you've define in the configuration need. This serves the same purpose as a DAL. You are still creating the query in the model, and you still need to be aware of the structure of your database. But despite what .net want's you to believe, those are really still concerns for .net DALs anyway.
However, to really GET what PHP is all about, you need to lose the trappings of a framework and work freely. PHP is a hacker language. It affords hacking. (as in seat-of-your-pants programming, not cracking, ok, both..) And that is really what you need to do to understand what the fuss is about.
Is it a double-edged sword? Totally. But playing fast-and-loose with code is where PHP comes into its own. There is a reason it is the goto language for speedy up-over-night startups.
Sorry for the long and technically off-topic answer. I hope you can forgive me. You said you have started to use PHP to understand the possibilities of it. If you keep going this way - you'll decide it is weak, inaccurate, clumsy, and prone to errors; and you'll miss all the greatness that it offers in its flexibility, extensibility, hack-ability, and spirit. I don't want you to miss the point of the language.

Could I please get some help correcting my little beginners project?

This is my first time posting something like this. I'm a complete n00b at programming/php. I was trying to grasp all the tutorials out there and wanted to create a sort of framework to base projects off of for web db/applications. I came up with a few files for crud operations that I know must really be horrible code. I was wondering if I could get some advice in advancing this 'framework' to the next level. I'm not great at OO, but I understand the concepts, so I went more functional instead. I'm aware that the songs are gross, I don't need help recognizing that.
I would like some help on the database calls. I understand I should be using PDO (to help with injection), but I'm not sure how to convert this code to that structure. I also realize that at the least I should be using mysqli functions. Again, n00b.
I am also aware of validating and sanitizing data, but again, being so new to this, I don't know where to begin. Especially if I wish to keep it tight and small. The comments are funny from a programmers aspect, but hey, you work with what you got. I'm trying to grasp MVC and be able to tie in AJAX and templates/skins, but the crux of it is to work with databases.
I do like how there is one config file that works with all the other files, and how that results in small files for index, read and delete. The others get a little longer. Not that including files is makes me cool or anything.
I think I fail horribly at understanding MVC and structuring the project so that maintaining it and adapting it is easier. I also realize that there is a lot of html in those php files which is a no-no too. How do I fill in the gaps from what I do know (I know what every line of every file is doing) to what I should know.
The code can be found here (probably not sourceforge worthy, but I want to help others learn as I do).
https://sourceforge.net/projects/eleete/files/
Building such a thing takes a good amount of time, before you go doing so I would suggest looking into open source CMSs such as Wordpress to see if they would suit you better than putting in hours of work creating something yourself, the reason I say this is because to begin with you may think it won't be too hard to create one for yourself, but as you get into it you will realize there are many avenues that need to be explored in terms of security and features.
However, if you still want to build something the most important thing is to be creating reusable, and easily understandable code. For example if you want to create db entries for things like pages, you'll want to create functions to do so, to which you can pass variables such as titles etc. A good way to begin is to create functions for collecting data from your db, for example siteinfo() could be a function that returns an array full of site info. To make sure every file has access to such functions you will need a global file like functions.php for example which you will need to include in each of your other files.
Remember, building a framework is hard work, but if you do it properly and thouraghly you should increase your productivity a good amount - this is something you need to consider when building it, make sure you're not doing things in a roundabout way. Make it simple, make it reusable, and make it powerful.
First off, welcome to the community! I hope you find here people who are excited to bring your more into the programming fold. It's an exciting place to be.
I get the impression you're biting off quite a bit. I fear you're also under the assumption you can write the perfect program from the get-go, which is a flat-out myth no matter how long you've been in the industry.
As to the former observation, my recommendation would be to pick a simple problem and try to solve it. My favorite recommendation here are simple card games - blackjack, for instance. Dice games like craps also make for short, achievable, and interesting programs. The intent of these projects will be not to build a code framework as much as your skills in dissecting problems and turning them into a solution the computer can understand and solve for you- your code.
Starting small will keep you from getting overwhelmed early. Starting fun will keep you motivated through the inevitable snags that will tempt you to throw your computer out of a closed window.
All that said, we're still here to help! Specific questions to specific problems tend to get the best feedback here, as well as questions that demonstrate you've done at least some homework on your own in terms of trying to solve it. The Stack Overflow community will be happy to give you a hand up, but not a handout. Good luck!
You're going to be much better off using a clean, simple framework. As you're so new with this stuff, I'd recommend CodeIgniter for sheer simplicity and speed. It helps enforce the MVC framework you're not totally familiar with yet, has all the built-ins you're likely looking for, and has a decent community. Being a Zend guy, I should probably suggest that, but it's definitely not the easiest to get started with.
MVC and OO are concepts you really should learn well out of the gate before going forward. This tutorial rocks. There are dozens of MVC primers out there, but in essence it boils down to separating your data layer, view layer, and the like.
PDO is not necessary to be safe, you just need to escape your sql with Mysql_escape_string or the like. I'm actually not a fan of PDO due to the monkey wrenches it throws into debugging.
Since you're new, I'd also recommend Xdebug on your server for troubleshooting. It cuts down debug time immensely.
In my experience, unless you've had to fix the shortfalls in someone else's attempt at a framework, you won't really understand how to build one yourself.
One of the key qualities of any sort of API or framework is the concept of abstraction. In a nutshell, as you find yourself repeating code, look for where the repetition could be abstracted away. The trick about this when you're building a framework is to do it in an extensible, usable fashion so that you have pieces that build on each other. In other words, abstractions can hide other abstractions. For example, It's all very well to abstract away the job of assembling an SQL UPDATE statement from a list of fields, but why does the application page have to check the list of fields is correct? Put that behind another layer that can be taught what the valid fields are for a certain object.
Another key quality that comes up at this point is refactoring. The phrase "be prepared to throw the first one away" is sometimes bandied about in programming circles. What it really means is that you should always be open to the idea of re-writing code because you've thought of a better way to do it. Even if you have to rebuild the code that calls it.

PHP framework or library for DB abstraction, secure login

I am building a site that requires a lot of MySQL inserts and lookups from different tables in a (hopefully) secure part of the site. I want to use an abstraction layer for the whole process. Should I use a PHP framework (like Zend or CakePHP) for this, or just use a simple library (like Crystal or Doctrine)?
I would also like to make sure that the DB inserts are done in a relatively secure part of the site (though not SSL). Currently, I am using the method outlined here (MD5 encryption and random challenge string), but maybe some of the frameworks come with similar functionality that would simplify the process?
What I'm trying to implement: a table of forms filled out with DB values. If you change a value or add a new row, pressing "save" will update or insert DB rows. I'm sure this has been done before, so I wouldn't want to reinvent the wheel.
Most PHP backends have secure access to a private database. Normally, there's little difficulty to keeping the database secure, mostly by not making it reachable directly. That way the security of access depends on the inability for anyone to tamper with the PHP code, and not any software security scheme.
I would recomend Symfony Framework for this. There is a great online tutorial on this at Practical Symfony.The Framework's Form class handles most of the security for you. It also has a nice login plugin to make the application secure.
Unless by Data Abstraction you mean an implementation of a Data Access Patterns like ActiveRecord or Table Data Gateway or something ORMish (in both cases you should update your question accordingly then), you don't need a framework, because PHP has a DB abstraction layer with PDO.
It sounds like you are really asking two different questions. One being should I use a framework (Zend, Symfony, Cake, etc) for the development of a website? The other being whether or not to use something along the lines of an ORM (Doctrine, Propel, etc)?
The answer to the first one is a resounding "yes". Frameworks are designed to keep you from having to reinvent the wheel for common/basic functionality. The time you spend learning how to (correctly) use a framework will payoff greatly in the long run. You'll eventually be much more productive that "rolling your own". Not to mention you'll gain a community of people who have likely been through similar situations and overcome issues similar to what you will face (that in and of itself could be the best reason to use a framework). I'm not going to suggest a particular framework since they all have strengths and weaknesses and is another topic in and of itself (however, I do use and prefer Zend Framework but don't let that influence your decision).
Concerning whether or not to use an ORM is a slightly more difficult question. I've recently began to work with them more and in general I would recommend them but it all boils down to using the right tool for the right job. They solve some specific problems very well, others not so much. However, since you specifically mention security I'll quickly address that. I don't think that a ORM inherently "increases security", however it can force you into making better decisions. That said, bad coding and bad coding practices will result in security issues no matter what technology/framework you are using.
Hope that helps!

Why use a web framework (like rails) over php?

This isn't a question about what framework to use. I've learned both Rails and Django, and I write all of my webapps in PHP. My question is why bother with the frameworks? It's always taken me longer to use a framework than to reuse old MySQL code and build "models" with phpMyAdmin. I also like writing everything myself, because I know what's going on. I can still reuse functions, etc. and do things how I want, and this freedom seems to be missing from most frameworks.
I'm not saying that my way is right; in fact, I'm trying to figure out where my logic fails. The hype can't be just thin air. What am I missing?
The basic idea of a framework is to allow you to work at a higher level of abstruction and write only the code you have to write to implement your specific requirements. All the other repetitive stuff is handled for you by the framework, and probably with far fewer bugs and security holes than if you did it yourself.
It may feel like it takes longer to learn a framework than to just do it yourself using basic language features and standard APIs, but it's simply not true - not if the framework is good and the app is non-trivial, and especially not once you have learned the framework (using a different one for each new project would of course be idiotic) and factor in the time it would take to find and eliminate all the bugs and correct all the design mistakes that have long since been found, eliminated and corrected in the framework by its developer community.
Almost every developer has cowboy coder instincts that tell him "Doing things yourself is much more fun than using code others have written, and I'm sure I'm good enough to get it right the first time, so it will even be faster and better!". These instincts are almost always wrong.
Frameworks allow you to concentrate on the application itself rather than worrying about the boilerplate code that you'd otherwise have to write for every application. They allow you to structure you site in a much more logical (mostly object-oriented) way, using tried and tested design patters such as model-view-controller. The code in framework is generally more mature and of a higher standard than code you would write yourself for one-off projects as framework have a large community of developers perfecting the code perfecting the code over year. This means that framework-driven sites often perform better and are much more secure.
You also mentioned you like writing things yourself - I know where you're coming from. My solution to this was to write my own framework - I get to reuse and improve my code with every project I do and I know the entire codebase inside out.
Writing it your self may make it easier for you to understand things your self but unfortunately it can make it much harder for other developers to understand what is happening. Frameworks will often be better documented and have a larger community that can support a new developer that is working on the app that you wrote.
I think a big part of it is what you focus on. Frameworks standardize the parts that you shouldn't have to keep revisiting, which helps you focus on the application as a whole. If you reuse your own code all the time you're already using your own makeshift framework.
Your comparing a framework (Rails) to a language (PHP). A framework is going to give you pre-built components so you can spend time on what makes your project unique.
You may already have a code base that helps do this for you. Check out some of the PHP frameworks since that's where you are more comfortable. Take a look at CakePHP, CodeIgnitor and/or Zend Framework.
If you are building many small apps/sites, using a framework may make your life easier.
I think a good step for you is to create your own framework with the code you've programmed so far. ;)
Try to make your code parametrizeable, in other words: create components which you can reuse in different parts of a website (for instance: styled containers), or in different websites (form generators/validators).
You can even go further and create base-classes from which you extend new classes to build your websites. (for instance: data objects with generic select/insert/update/delete methods).
I bet this gives you the best view on why frameworks are so damn handy ;)
It'll take you longer to initially use a framework for the same reasons a PHP developer would take longer to initially use Ruby - you're not familiar with it.
Once you're familiar with them, frameworks can offer the ability to skip the mundane and focus on actually writing the important parts of the app.
You should also just use a PHP based framework like Symfony or CakePHP using them should reduce your production time considerably.
One reason to use a frame work is code separation. Take symfony for example. The model is all done with propel or doctrine libraries. Very little SQL needed. You instantiate a new object and user getters and setters, to store your data, and instead of writing SQL in your page code you create functions in the objects related to the query. When you need to access the same kind of data on different pages you are asking the model for it, keeping the business logic with the model where it should be, so there's never any difference. All the work is done in the "action controller function". You get all the data you need, and then put as little php in the display, basically just echoing the variables you got in the action controller, (with the exception of some for loops and if statements for conditionals. I have found this a more efficient way to code, and on my 2nd project saw the production time cut in half.
You don't need to learn a new language python/ruby just to use a great framework, just have to fin one that works for you.
First, PHP has frameworks too, so the question as stated misses the point.
Yes, you can write your own framework, and as Kris said, there's no shame in that. However, part of the leverage of code reuse is the collective value of the efforts of many. It's not just about reusing your own code. Frameworks encapsulate the common tasks and patterns we all share and provide well tested solutions with many iterations of improvements from the community. No individual effort is going to measure up to that, no matter who you are.
If you roll your own, it will only become world class due to the collective effort of world class people, and that will only happen if your idea merits the attention. The top frameworks out there are already proven on those criteria.
DHH is a smart guy, but the Rails we have today never could have been realized by him alone. Not even close.
If you like "writing everything yourself" as you say, then choose a framework with a core philosophy that matches yours, and start making core contributions in the areas where you can see room for improvement.
Depending on the functions of your Web Application, it can be faster to develop without a framework. For example when the Webapp is just some kind of data viewer.
But as soon as you begin to implement more advanced functions, you are much more efficient with a framework.
Try do do this from scratch:
- proper Form validation
- Handling of multiple Language and Date/Time formatting
- Authentication
See a framework as free tools and stable implemented function for you to use.
Sounds to me like you have already written your own framework in php, since you do mention code reuse.
I can imagine it being easier to use your own set of wheels instead of adapting to someone else's. No shame in that.
Frameworks are there mainly to help people who are semi-new to PHP (or the specific language it is built on) to be able to build a website to an extent that it is secure and easy enough to add on extra parts to the site without having to know a lot about the specifics like security, MySQL (or other database types). In my opinion it is a fairly good way to help break coders into a language, allowing for the fact that the framework isn't too complex of course.
EDIT The reason behind me saying they are for beginners is because myself, as a beginner has used frameworks to break myself into languages a lot better.

Categories