Related
where do objects, static, and constant variables live in php?
I'm worried if I declare too many static/constants, would result to a memory leak.
thank you.
best regards,
bhadz
You should worry about this only if you have a script that continuously works for days or weeks. If you run your scripts using apache's mod_rewrite - don't bother yourself by such questions
PHP manages everything related to memory automatically, in 99.9% cases you shouldn't care of it
When working with PHP you usually work with modules of a web server. This means that the script is sort of sandboxed and there are no risks (every single run of the script will just end itself in a short and release everything that it is associated with it).
When working in CLI mode you can have issues only if you are working with long lasting executions (and you probably won't).
To answer your specific question I don't know the internals of PHP but almost all interpreters have a heap in which they store allocated objects so I guess that PHP is not an exception.
I'm running a PHP script (CLI) to calculate a big thing. It will probably be an (almost) infinite loop but after 17000 runs I run out of memory. Can I some way dump some memory (say like every 1000th run) so I can keep running it forever?
/Max
In PHP 5.3: gc_collect_cycles().
Here's an article on memory management in PHP.
You can also increase available memory in PHP if you aren't already maxed out.
Keep in mind:
Sometimes you can't just "dump memory". Depending on your algorithm, you may need the results from previous calculations for future calculations.
The key here might be to break your problem up into smaller problems and solve them individually.
Check out this article on Dynamic Programming.
Provided this is not a server application, I would recommend breaking up the script into cron jobs.
Anyway, the problem is more than likely that you're not being careful with your variables. If you're running out of memory, then then you need to remember to unset() your variables. As well, watch your variable scope. If a variable never goes out of scope, PHP GC cannot clean it up until you remove all references to it.
Right now I'm running 50 PHP (in CLI mode) individual workers (processes) per machine that are waiting to receive their workload (job). For example, the job of resizing an image. In workload they receive the image (binary data) and the desired size. The worker does it's work and returns the resized image back. Then it waits for more jobs (it loops in a smart way). I'm presuming that I have the same executable, libraries and classes loaded and instantiated 50 times. Am I correct? Because this does not sound very effective.
What I'd like to have now is one process that handles all this work and being able to use all available CPU cores while having everything loaded only once (to be more efficient). I presume a new thread would be started for each job and after it finishes, the thread would stop. More jobs would be accepted if there are less than 50 threads doing the work. If all 50 threads are busy, no additional jobs are accepted.
I am using a lot of libraries (for Memcached, Redis, MogileFS, ...) to have access to all the various components that the system uses and Python is pretty much the only language apart from PHP that has support for all of them.
Can Python do what I want and will it be faster and more efficient that the current PHP solution?
Most probably - yes. But don't assume you have to do multithreading. Have a look at the multiprocessing module. It already has an implementation of a Pool included, which is what you could use. And it basically solves the GIL problem (multithreading can run only 1 "standard python code" at any time - that's a very simplified explanation).
It will still fork a process per job, but in a different way than starting it all over again. All the initialisations done- and libraries loaded before entering the worker process will be inherited in a copy-on-write way. You won't do more initialisations than necessary and you will not waste memory for the same libarary/class if you didn't actually make it different from the pre-pool state.
So yes - looking only at this part, python will be wasting less resources and will use a "nicer" worker-pool model. Whether it will really be faster / less CPU-abusing, is hard to tell without testing, or at least looking at the code. Try it yourself.
Added: If you're worried about memory usage, python may also help you a bit, since it has a "proper" garbage collector, while in php GC is a not a priority and not that good (and for a good reason too).
Linux has shared libraries, so those 50 php processes use mostly the same libraries.
You don't sound like you even have a problem at all.
"this does not sound very effective." is not a problem description, if anything those words are a problem on their own. Writing code needs a real reason, else you're just wasting time and/or money.
Python is a fine language and won't perform worse than php. Python's multiprocessing module will probably help a lot too. But there isn't much to gain if the php implementation is not completly insane. So why even bother spending time on it when everything works? That is usually the goal, not a reason to rewrite ...
If you are on a sane operating system then shared libraries should only be loaded once and shared among all processes using them. Memory for data structures and connection handles will obviously be duplicated, but the overhead of stopping and starting the systems may be greater than keeping things up while idle. If you are using something like gearman it might make sense to let several workers stay up even if idle and then have a persistent monitoring process that will start new workers if all the current workers are busy up until a threshold such as the number of available CPUs. That process could then kill workers in a LIFO manner after they have been idle for some period of time.
I wish to create a background process and I have been told these are usually written in C or something of that sort. I have recently found out PHP can be used to create a daemon and I was hoping to get some advice if I should make use of PHP in this way.
Here are my requirements for a daemon.
Continuously check if a row has been
added to MySQL database table
Run FFmpeg commands on what was
retrieved from database
Insert output into MySQL table
I am not sure what else I can offer to help make this decision. Just to add, I have not done C before. Only Java and PHP and basic bash scripting.
Does it even make that much of a performance difference?
Please allow for my ignorance, I am learning! :)
Thanks all
As others have noted, various versions of PHP have issues with their garbage collectors. Of course, if you know that your version does not have such issues, you eliminate that problem. The point is, you don't know (for sure) until you write the daemon and run it through valgrind to see if the installed PHP leaks or not on any given machine. So on that hand, you may write it just to discover that what Zend thinks is fixed might still be buggy, or you are dealing with a slightly older version of PHP or some extension. Icky.
The other problem is somewhat buggy signals. In my experience, signal handlers are not always entered correctly with PHP, especially when the signal is queued instead of merged. That may not be an issue for you, i.e. if you just need to handle SIGINT/SIGUSR1/SIGUSR2/SIGHUP.
So, I suggest:
If the daemon is simple, go ahead and use PHP. If it looks like its going to get rather complex, or allocate lots of memory, you might consider writing it in C after prototyping it in PHP.
I am a pretty die hard C person. However, I see nothing wrong with hammering out something quick using PHP (beyond the cases that I explained). I also see nothing wrong with using PHP to prototype something that may or may not be later rewritten in C. For instance, handling database stuff is going to be much simpler if you use PHP, versus managing callbacks using other interfaces in C. So in that instance, for a 'one off', you will surely get it done much faster.
I would be inclined to perform this task with a cron job, rather than polling the database in a daemon.
It's likely that your FFmpeg command will take a while to do it's thing, right? In that case, is it really necessary to be constantly polling the database? Wouldn't a cronjob running each minute (or every five, ten or twenty minutes for that matter) be a simpler way to achieve the same thing?
Php isn't any better or worse for this kind of thing than any of the other common scripting languages. It has fairly complete access to all of the system calls and library utilities you would need to do this sort of work. If you are most comfortable using PHP for scripting, then php will do the job for you.
The only down side is that php is not quite as ubiquitous as, say, perl or python, which is installed on almost every flavor of unix. Php is only found on systems that are going to be serving dynamic web content. Not that a Php interpreter is too large or costly to install also, but if your biggest concern is getting your program to many systems, that may be a slight hurdle.
I'll be contrary and recommend you try the php daemon. It's apparently the language you know the best. You'll presumably incorporate a timer in any case, so you can duplicate the querying frequency on the database. There's really no penalty as long as you aren't naively looping on a query.
If it's something not executed frequently, you could alternatively run the php from cron, letting youor code drain the queue and then die.
But don't be afraid to stick with what you know best, as a first approximation.
Try not to use triggers. They'll impose unnecessary coupling, and they're no fun to test and debug.
One problem with properly daemonizing a PHP script is that PHP doesn't have interfaces to the dup() or dup2() syscalls, which are needed for detaching the file descriptors.
A cron-job would probably work just fine, if near-instant actions is not required.
I'm just about to put live, a system I've built, based on the queueing daemon 'beanstalkd'. I send various small messages from (in this case, PHP) webpage calls to the daemon, and a PHP script then picks them up from the queue and performs various tasks, such as resizing images or checking databases (often passing info back via a Memcache-based store).
To avoid long-running processes, I've wrapped it in a BASH script, that, depending on the value returned from the script ("exit(1);") will restart the script, for every (say) 50 tasks it's performed. If it's restarting because I plan it to, it will do so instantly, any other exit value (the default is 0, so I don't use that) would pause a few seconds before it was restarted.
Running as a cron job with sensibly determined periodicity, a PHP script can do the job, and production stability is certainly achievable. You might want to limit the number of simultaneous FFMpeg instances, and be sure to have complete application logging and exception handling. I have implemented continuously running polling processes in Java, as well as the every-ten-minute cron'd PHP script, and both do the job nicely.
You might want to consider making a mysql trigger that executes a system command (i.e. FFmpeg) instead of a daemon. If some lag isn't a problem, you could also put something in cron that executes every few minutes to check. Cron would be my choice, if it is an option.
To answer your question, php is perfectly fine to run as a daemon. It does not have to be done in C.
If you combine the answers from Kent Fredric, tokenmacguy and Domster you get something useful.
php is probably not good for long execution times,
so let's keep every execution cycle short and make sure the OS takes care of the cleanup of any memoryleaks.
As a tool to start your php script cron can be a good tool.
And if you do it like that, there is not much difference between languages.
However, the question still stands.
Is php even capable to run as a normal daemon for long times (some years)?
Or will assorted memoryleaks eat up all your ram and kill the system?
/Johan
If you do so, pay attention to memory leaks. PHP 5.2 has some problems with its garbage collector, according to this (fixed in 5.3). Perhaps its better to use cron, so the script starts clean every run.
For what you've described, I would go with a daemon. Make sure that you stick a sleep in the poll loop, so that you don't bombard the database when there are no new tasks. A cronjob works better for workflow/report type of jobs, where there isn't some particular event that triggers the next run.
As mentioned, PHP has some problems with memory management. You need to be sure that you test your code for memory leaks, since these would build up over time, in a long running script. PHP doesn't have real garbage collection - It relies on reference counting, which means that cyclic references will cause leaks. If you're aware of this, you can code around it.
If you do decided to go down the daemon route, there is a great PEAR module called System_Daemon which I've recently used successfully on a PHP v5.3.0 installation. It is documented on the authors blog: http://kevin.vanzonneveld.net/techblog/article/create_daemons_in_php
If you have PEAR installed, you can install this module using:
pear install -f System_Daemon
You will also need to create a initialisation script: /etc/init.d/<your_daemon_name>
Then you can:
Start Daemon: /etc/init.d/projNotifMailDaemon start
Stop Daemon: /etc/init.d/projNotifMailDaemon stop
Logs are kept at: /var/log/<your_daemon_name>.log
I wouldn't recommend it. PHP is not designed for longterm execution. Its designed primarily with short lived pages.
In my experience PHP can have problems with leaking memory for some of the larger tasks.
A cron job and a little bit of bash scripting should be everything you need by the sounds of it. You can do things like:
$file=`mysqlquery -h server < "select file from table;"`
ffmpeg $file -fps 50 output.a etc.
so bash would be easier to write, port and maintain IMHO than to use PHP.
If you know what you are doing sure. You need to understand your operating system well. PHP generally isn't suited for most daemons because it isn't threaded and doesn't have a decent event based system for all tasks. However if it suits your needs then no problem. Modern PHP (5.3+) is really stable and doesn't have any memory leaks. As long as you enable the GC and don't implement your own memory leaks, etc you'll be fine.
Here are the stats for one daemon I am running:
uptime 17 days (last restart due to PHP upgrade).
bytes written: 200GB
connections: hundreds
connections handled, hundreds of thousands
items/requests processed: millions
node.js is generally better suited although has some minor annoyances. Some attempts to improve PHP in the same areas have been made but they aren't really that great.
Cron job? Yes.
Daemon which runs forever? No.
PHP does not have a garbage collector (or at least, last time I checked it did not). Therefore, if you create a circular reference, it NEVER gets cleaned up - at least not until the main script execution finishes. In daemon process this is approximately never.
If they've added a GC in new versions, then yes you can.
Go for it. I had to do it once also.
Like others said, it's not ideal but it'll get-er-done. Using Windows, right? Good.
If you only need it to run occasionally (Once per hour, etc).
Make a new shortcut to your firefox, place it somewhere relevant.
Open up the properties for the shortcut, change "Target" to:
"C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe" http://localhost/path/to/script.php
Go to Control Panel>Scheduled Tasks
Point your new scheduled task at the shortcut.
If you need it to run constantly or pseudo-constantly, you'll need to spice the script up a bit.
Start your script with
set_time_limit(0);
ob_implicit_flush(true);
If the script uses a loop (like while) you have to clear the buffer:
$i=0;
while($i<sizeof($my_array)){
//do stuff
flush();
ob_clean();
sleep(17);
$i++;
}
I found this PECL package called threads, but there is not a release yet. And nothing is coming up on the PHP website.
From the PHP manual for the pthreads extension:
pthreads is an Object Orientated API that allows user-land multi-threading in PHP. It includes all the tools you need to create multi-threaded applications targeted at the Web or the Console. PHP applications can create, read, write, execute and synchronize with Threads, Workers and Stackables.
As unbelievable as this sounds, it's entirely true. Today, PHP can multi-thread for those wishing to try it.
The first release of PHP4, 22 May 2000, PHP was shipped with a thread safe architecture - a way for it to execute multiple instances of it's interpreter in separate threads in multi-threaded SAPI ( Server API ) environments. Over the last 13 years, the design of this architecture has been maintained and advanced: It has been in production use on the worlds largest websites ever since.
Threading in user land was never a concern for the PHP team, and it remains as such today. You should understand that in the world where PHP does it's business, there's already a defined method of scaling - add hardware. Over the many years PHP has existed, hardware has got cheaper and cheaper and so this became less and less of a concern for the PHP team. While it was getting cheaper, it also got much more powerful; today, our mobile phones and tablets have dual and quad core architectures and plenty of RAM to go with it, our desktops and servers commonly have 8 or 16 cores, 16 and 32 gigabytes of RAM, though we may not always be able to have two within budget and having two desktops is rarely useful for most of us.
Additionally, PHP was written for the non-programmer, it is many hobbyists native tongue. The reason PHP is so easily adopted is because it is an easy language to learn and write. The reason PHP is so reliable today is because of the vast amount of work that goes into it's design, and every single decision made by the PHP group. It's reliability and sheer greatness keep it in the spot light, after all these years; where it's rivals have fallen to time or pressure.
Multi-threaded programming is not easy for most, even with the most coherent and reliable API, there are different things to think about, and many misconceptions. The PHP group do not wish for user land multi-threading to be a core feature, it has never been given serious attention - and rightly so. PHP should not be complex, for everyone.
All things considered, there are still benefits to be had from allowing PHP to utilize it's production ready and tested features to allow a means of making the most out of what we have, when adding more isn't always an option, and for a lot of tasks is never really needed.
pthreads achieves, for those wishing to explore it, an API that does allow a user to multi-thread PHP applications. It's API is very much a work in progress, and designated a beta level of stability and completeness.
It is common knowledge that some of the libraries PHP uses are not thread safe, it should be clear to the programmer that pthreads cannot change this, and does not attempt to try. However, any library that is thread safe is useable, as in any other thread safe setup of the interpreter.
pthreads utilizes Posix Threads ( even in Windows ), what the programmer creates are real threads of execution, but for those threads to be useful, they must be aware of PHP - able to execute user code, share variables and allow a useful means of communication ( synchronization ). So every thread is created with an instance of the interpreter, but by design, it's interpreter is isolated from all other instances of the interpreter - just like multi-threaded Server API environments. pthreads attempts to bridge the gap in a sane and safe way. Many of the concerns of the programmer of threads in C just aren't there for the programmer of pthreads, by design, pthreads is copy on read and copy on write ( RAM is cheap ), so no two instances ever manipulate the same physical data, but they can both affect data in another thread. The fact that PHP may use thread unsafe features in it's core programming is entirely irrelevant, user threads, and it's operations are completely safe.
Why copy on read and copy on write:
public function run() {
...
(1) $this->data = $data;
...
(2) $this->other = someOperation($this->data);
...
}
(3) echo preg_match($pattern, $replace, $thread->data);
(1) While a read, and write lock are held on the pthreads object data store, data is copied from its original location in memory to the object store. pthreads does not adjust the refcount of the variable, Zend is able to free the original data if there are no further references to it.
(2) The argument to someOperation references the object store, the original data stored, which it itself a copy of the result of (1), is copied again for the engine into a zval container, while this occurs a read lock is held on the object store, the lock is released and the engine can execute the function. When the zval is created, it has a refcount of 0, enabling the engine to free the copy on completion of the operation, because no other references to it exist.
(3) The last argument to preg_match references the data store, a read lock is obtained, the data set in (1) is copied to a zval, again with a refcount of 0. The lock is released, The call to preg_match operates on a copy of data, that is itself a copy of the original data.
Things to know:
The object store's hash table where data is stored, thread safe, is
based on the TsHashTable shipped with PHP, by Zend.
The object store has a read and write lock, an additional access lock is provided for the TsHashTable such that if requires ( and it does, var_dump/print_r, direct access to properties as the PHP engine wants to reference them ) pthreads can manipulate the TsHashTable outside of the defined API.
The locks are only held while the copying operations occur, when the copies have been made the locks are released, in a sensible order.
This means:
When a write occurs, not only are a read and write lock held, but an
additional access lock. The table itself is locked down, there is no
possible way another context can lock, read, write or affect it.
When a read occurs, not only is the read lock held, but the
additional access lock too, again the table is locked down.
No two contexts can physically nor concurrently access the same data from the object store, but writes made in any context with a reference will affect the data read in any context with a reference.
This is shared nothing architecture and the only way to exist is co-exist. Those a bit savvy will see that, there's a lot of copying going on here, and they will wonder if that is a good thing. Quite a lot of copying goes on within a dynamic runtime, that's the dynamics of a dynamic language. pthreads is implemented at the level of the object, because good control can be gained over one object, but methods - the code the programmer executes - have another context, free of locking and copies - the local method scope. The object scope in the case of a pthreads object should be treated as a way to share data among contexts, that is it's purpose. With this in mind you can adopt techniques to avoid locking the object store unless it's necessary, such as passing local scope variables to other methods in a threaded object rather than having them copy from the object store upon execution.
Most of the libraries and extensions available for PHP are thin wrappers around 3rd parties, PHP core functionality to a degree is the same thing. pthreads is not a thin wrapper around Posix Threads; it is a threading API based on Posix Threads. There is no point in implementing Threads in PHP that it's users do not understand or cannot use. There's no reason that a person with no knowledge of what a mutex is or does should not be able to take advantage of all that they have, both in terms of skill, and resources. An object functions like an object, but wherever two contexts would otherwise collide, pthreads provides stability and safety.
Anyone who has worked in java will see the similarities between a pthreads object and threading in java, those same people will have no doubt seen an error called ConcurrentModificationException - as it sounds an error raised by the java runtime if two threads write the same physical data concurrently. I understand why it exists, but it baffles me that with resources as cheap as they are, coupled with the fact the runtime is able to detect the concurrency at the exact and only time that safety could be achieved for the user, that it chooses to throw a possibly fatal error at runtime rather than manage the execution and access to the data.
No such stupid errors will be emitted by pthreads, the API is written to make threading as stable, and compatible as is possible, I believe.
Multi-threading isn't like using a new database, close attention should be paid to every word in the manual and examples shipped with pthreads.
Lastly, from the PHP manual:
pthreads was, and is, an experiment with pretty good results. Any of its limitations or features may change at any time; that is the nature of experimentation. It's limitations - often imposed by the implementation - exist for good reason; the aim of pthreads is to provide a useable solution to multi-tasking in PHP at any level. In the environment which pthreads executes, some restrictions and limitations are necessary in order to provide a stable environment.
Here is an example of what Wilco suggested:
$cmd = 'nohup nice -n 10 /usr/bin/php -c /path/to/php.ini -f /path/to/php/file.php action=generate var1_id=23 var2_id=35 gen_id=535 > /path/to/log/file.log & echo $!';
$pid = shell_exec($cmd);
Basically this executes the PHP script at the command line, but immediately returns the PID and then runs in the background. (The echo $! ensures nothing else is returned other than the PID.) This allows your PHP script to continue or quit if you want. When I have used this, I have redirected the user to another page, where every 5 to 60 seconds an AJAX call is made to check if the report is still running. (I have a table to store the gen_id and the user it's related to.) The check script runs the following:
exec('ps ' . $pid , $processState);
if (count($processState) < 2) {
// less than 2 rows in the ps, therefore report is complete
}
There is a short post on this technique here: http://nsaunders.wordpress.com/2007/01/12/running-a-background-process-in-php/
There is nothing available that I'm aware of. The next best thing would be to simply have one script execute another via CLI, but that's a bit rudimentary. Depending on what you are trying to do and how complex it is, this may or may not be an option.
In short: yes, there is multithreading in php but you should use multiprocessing instead.
Backgroud info: threads vs. processes
There is always a bit confusion about the distinction of threads and processes, so i'll shortly describe both:
A thread is a sequence of commands that the CPU will process. The only data it consists of is a program counter. Each CPU core will only process one thread at a time but can switch between the execution of different ones via scheduling.
A process is a set of shared resources. That means it consists of a part of memory, variables, object instances, file handles, mutexes, database connections and so on. Each process also contains one or more threads. All threads of the same process share its resources, so you may use a variable in one thread that you created in another. If those threads are parts of two different processes, then they cannot access each others resources directly. In this case you need inter-process communication through e.g. pipes, files, sockets...
Multiprocessing
You can achieve parallel computing by creating new processes (that also contain a new thread) with php. If your threads do not need much communication or synchronization, this is your choice, since the processes are isolated and cannot interfere with each other's work. Even if one crashes, that doesn't concern the others. If you do need much communication, you should read on at "multithreading" or - sadly - consider using another programming language, because inter-process communication and synchronization introduces a lot of complexion.
In php you have two ways to create a new process:
let the OS do it for you: you can tell your operation system to create a new process and run a new (or the same) php script in it.
for linux you can use the following or consider Darryl Hein's answer:
$cmd = 'nice php script.php 2>&1 & echo $!';
pclose(popen($cmd, 'r'));
for windows you may use this:
$cmd = 'start "processname" /MIN /belownormal cmd /c "script.php 2>&1"';
pclose(popen($cmd, 'r'));
do it yourself with a fork: php also provides the possibility to use forking through the function pcntl_fork(). A good tutorial on how to do this can be found here but i strongly recommend not to use it, since fork is a crime against humanity and especially against oop.
Multithreading
With multithreading all your threads share their resources so you can easily communicate between and synchronize them without a lot of overhead. On the other side you have to know what you are doing, since race conditions and deadlocks are easy to produce but very difficult to debug.
Standard php does not provide any multithreading but there is an (experimental) extension that actually does - pthreads. Its api documentation even made it into php.net.
With it you can do some stuff as you can in real programming languages :-) like this:
class MyThread extends Thread {
public function run(){
//do something time consuming
}
}
$t = new MyThread();
if($t->start()){
while($t->isRunning()){
echo ".";
usleep(100);
}
$t->join();
}
For linux there is an installation guide right here at stackoverflow's.
For windows there is one now:
First you need the thread-safe version of php.
You need the pre-compiled versions of both pthreads and its php extension. They can be downloaded here. Make sure that you download the version that is compatible with your php version.
Copy php_pthreads.dll (from the zip you just downloaded) into your php extension folder ([phpDirectory]/ext).
Copy pthreadVC2.dll into [phpDirectory] (the root folder - not the extension folder).
Edit [phpDirectory]/php.ini and insert the following line
extension=php_pthreads.dll
Test it with the script above with some sleep or something right there where the comment is.
And now the big BUT: Although this really works, php wasn't originally made for multithreading. There exists a thread-safe version of php and as of v5.4 it seems to be nearly bug-free but using php in a multi-threaded environment is still discouraged in the php manual (but maybe they just did not update their manual on this, yet). A much bigger problem might be that a lot of common extensions are not thread-safe. So you might get threads with this php extension but the functions you're depending on are still not thread-safe so you will probably encounter race conditions, deadlocks and so on in code you did not write yourself...
You can use pcntl_fork() to achieve something similar to threads. Technically it's separate processes, so the communication between the two is not as simple with threads, and I believe it will not work if PHP is called by apache.
If anyone cares, I have revived php_threading (not the same as threads, but similar) and I actually have it to the point where it works (somewhat) well!
Project page
Download (for Windows PHP 5.3 VC9 TS)
Examples
README
pcntl_fork() is what you are searching for, but its process forking not threading.
so you will have the problem of data exchange. to solve them you can use phps semaphore functions ( http://www.php.net/manual/de/ref.sem.php ) message queues may be a bit easier for the beginning than shared memory segments.
Anyways, a strategy i am using in a web framework that i am developing which loads resource intensive blocks of a web page (probably with external requests) parallel:
i am doing a job queue to know what data i am waiting for and then i fork off the jobs for every process. once done they store their data in the apc cache under a unique key the parent process can access. once every data is there it continues.
i am using simple usleep() to wait because inter process communication is not possible in apache (children will loose the connection to their parents and become zombies...).
so this brings me to the last thing:
its important to self kill every child!
there are as well classes that fork processes but keep data, i didn't examine them but zend framework has one, and they usually do slow but reliably code.
you can find it here:
http://zendframework.com/manual/1.9/en/zendx.console.process.unix.overview.html
i think they use shm segments!
well last but not least there is an error on this zend website, minor mistake in the example.
while ($process1->isRunning() && $process2->isRunning()) {
sleep(1);
}
should of course be:
while ($process1->isRunning() || $process2->isRunning()) {
sleep(1);
}
There is a Threading extension being activley developed based on PThreads that looks very promising at https://github.com/krakjoe/pthreads
Just an update, its seem that PHP guys are working on supporting thread and its available now.
Here is the link to it:
http://php.net/manual/en/book.pthreads.php
I have a PHP threading class that's been running flawlessly in a production environment for over two years now.
EDIT: This is now available as a composer library and as part of my MVC framework, Hazaar MVC.
See: https://git.hazaarlabs.com/hazaar/hazaar-thread
I know this is a way old question, but you could look at http://phpthreadlib.sourceforge.net/
Bi-directional communication, support for Win32, and no extensions required.
Ever heard about appserver from techdivision?
It is written in php and works as a appserver managing multithreads for high traffic php applications. Is still in beta but very promesing.
There is the rather obscure, and soon to be deprecated, feature called ticks. The only thing I have ever used it for, is to allow a script to capture SIGKILL (Ctrl+C) and close down gracefully.