Unique code after php link - php

I want to create a way for images to generate a short link such as domain.com/9t6So63
I want to make it 8 chars long after domain.com/ long and accept
0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
how many total generated links could i get out of this? And should i make it more?

0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
This is a 62 characters longs string.
If your problem is only to know the number of links you can generate, it's no more than a simple Math problem :
62^8 = 218,340,105,584,896

how many total generated links could i get out of this?
You would get 62^8 combinations from this.
You could use uniqid() to generate the unique string. This string is generated based on a current time in microseconds so beware if you have multiple server instances generating the id at the same microsecond.
With an empty prefix, the returned string will be 13 characters long. If more_entropy is TRUE, it will be 23 characters.

Number of links are defined by the number of available characters and the length of that string, you've got twenty-six letters and ten numbers available for each position, and you're able to use each character more than once, so:
368 = 2821109907456
If you're able to use upper-case characters as well, then you've got 62 available characters for each of the eight positions, which gives a range of 628 (2821109907456) possible combinations.

This is not just a php problem, this is about combination.
The number of generate "links" changes if you want to repeat or not the chars in the chosen subset.

Related

How to generate unique alphanumeric string for unlimited time which is not exist in mysql database?

I need to generate unique alphanumeric string by checking mysql database. The string can be A-Z and 0-9 combination. I have try floor() and rand() function but there is a possibility to repeat same string if vast number of user try once.
If you generate random number/string it's always possible to get the same string. However, if you generate 16-char (or more) length string it's unlikely that you will ever get the same string.
You can generate random string and then check if it exist in database. In that very rare situation you can generate new random string in while loop until you find one that is free. As I wrote before, even 16 characters length text with [A-Z0-9] is almost impossible to repeat. It's 36^16 possible combinations.
You can also pregenerate let's say 1000 strings, sort them by random order and put into database. After that you simply choose first unsued string from database.
you can use uniqid() function, which is generate string current time based. If you want upper case letters use like this:
strtoupper(uniqid());

Encoding/Compressing a large integer into alphanumeric value

I have a very large integer 12-14 digits long and I want to encrypt/compress this to an alphanumeric value so that the integer can be recovered later from the alphanumeric value. I tried to convert this integer using a 62 base and tried to map those values to a-zA-Z0-9, but the value generated from this is 7 characters long. This length is still long enough and I want to convert to about 4-5 characters.
Is there a general way to do this or some method in which this can be done so that recovering the integer would still be possible? I am asking the mathematical aspects here but I would be programming this in PHP and I recently started programming in php.
Edit:
I was thinking in terms of assigning a masking bit and using this in a fashion to generate less number of Chars. I am aware of the fact that the range is not enough and that is the reason I was focusing on using a mathematical trick or a way of representation. The 62 base was an Idea that I already applied but is not working out.
14 digit decimal numbers can express 100,000,000,000,000 values (1014).
5 characters of a 62 character alphabet can express 916,132,832 values (625).
You cannot cram the equivalent number of values of a 14 digit number into a 5 character base 62 string. It's simply not possible to express each possible value uniquely. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle. Even base 64 with 7 characters is not enough (only 4,398,046,511,104 possible values). In fact, if you target a 5 character short string you'd need to compensate by using a base 631 alphabet (6315 = 100,033,806,792,151).
Even compression doesn't help you. It would mean that two or more numbers would need to compress to the same compressed string (because there aren't enough possible unique compressed values), which logically means it's impossible to uncompress them into two different values.
To illustrate this very simply: Say my alphabet and target "string length" consists of one bit. That one bit can be 0 or 1. It can express 2 unique possible values. Say I have a compression algorithm which compresses anything and everything into this one bit. ... How could I possibly uncompress 100,000,000,000,000 unique values out of that one bit with two possible values? If you'd solve that problem, bandwidth and storage concerns would immediately evaporate and you'd be a billionaire.
With 95 printable ASCII characters you can switch to base 95 encoding instead of 62:
!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?#ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~
That way an integer string of length X can be compressed into length Y base 95 string, where
Y = X * log 10/ log 95 = roughly X / 2
which is pretty good compression. So from length 12 you get down to 6. If the purpose of compression is to save the bandwidth by using JSON, then base 92 can be good choice (excluding ",\,/ that become escaped in JSON).
Surely you can get better compression but the price to pay is a larger alphabet. Just replace 95 in the above formula by the number of symbols.
Unless of course, you know the structure of your integers. For instance, if they have plenty of zeroes, you can base your compression on this knowledge to get much better results.
because the pigeon principle you will end up with some values that get compressed and other values that get expanded. It simply impossible to create a compression algorithm that compress every possible input string (i.e. in your case your numbers).
If you force the cardinality of the output set to be smaller than the cardinality of the input set you'll get collisions (i.e. more input strings get "compressed" to the same compressed binary string). A compression algorithm should be reversible, right? :)

Generate a pseudo random 6 character string from an integer

I am trying to resolve the following problem via PHP. The aim is to generate a unique 6-character string based on an integer seed and containing a predefined range of characters. The second requirement is that the string must appear random (so if code 1 were 100000, it is not acceptable for code 2 to be 100001, and 3 100002)
The range of characters is:
Uppercase A-Z excluding: B, I, O, S and Z
0-9 excluding: 0, 1, 2, 5, 8
So that would be a total of 26 characters if I am not mistaken. My first idea would to be encoding from base 10 to base 24 starting at number 7962624. So do 7962624 + seed, and then base24 encode that number.
This gives me the characters 0-N. If I replace the resulting string in the following fashion, I then meet the first criteria:
B=P, I=Q, 0=R, 1=T, 2=U, 5=V, 8=W
So at this point, my codes will look something like this:
1=TRRRR, 2=TRRRT, 3=TRRRU
So my question to you gurus is: How can I make a method that behaves consistently (so the return string for a given integer is always the same) and meets the 2 requirements above? I have spent 2 full days on this now and short of dumping 700,000,000 codes into a database and retrieving them randomly I'm all out of ideas.
Stephen
You get a reasonably random looking sequence if you take your input sequence 1,2,3... and apply a linear map modulo a prime number. The number of unique codes is limited to the prime number so you should choose a large one. The resulting codes will be unique as long as you choose a multiplier that's not divisible by the prime.
Here's an example: With 6 characters you can make 266=308915776 unique strings, so a suitable prime number could be 308915753. This function therefore will generate over 300.000.000 unique codes:
function encode($num) {
$scrambled = (240049382*$num + 37043083) % 308915753;
return base_convert($scrambled, 10, 26);
}
Make sure that you run this on 64bit PHP though, otherwise the multiplication will overflow. On 32bit you'll have to use bcmath. The codes generated for the numbers 1 through 9 are:
n89a2d
hdh4jo
biopb9
5o6k2k
3eek5
k8m9aj
ee4424
8jbojf
2ojjb0
All that's left is filling in the initial 0s that are sometimes missing and replacing the letters and numbers so that none of the forbidden characters are produced.
As you can see, there's no obvious pattern, but someone with some time on their hands, enough motivation and with access to a few of this codes will be able to find out what's going on. A safer alternative is using an encryption algorithm with a small block size, such as Skip32.

How to encode strings inside serial number using PHP?

I need to generate serial numbers using PHP in the following format "ASDK3-JDAL9-24SFT-J5D8R-D4AL9". One requirement is the fact that I need to encode somehow a timestamp and an email address inside this serial number and then retrieve them when needed. Is there any easy way to do this?
EDIT
To be more specific the allowed numbers and letters in serial number need to be 0-9 and A-Z. To make it more generic I need to have 2 short strings for example encoded in that serial number. For example a date "04/03/2013" and one number "324" or email address if possible. The string don't need to be human readable in the serial number but I need to be able to retrieve them when needed.
Let's do some simple math using base32 encode. You have 36 characters but we'll assume 32 because we're doing a rough estimate.
Base 32 adds 60% overhead. If you want to store a date of 8 characters and a number of 3 characters you'll need at least: ( 8 + 3 ) * 1.6 = 18 characters for this data. Your key is 25 characters long so you'll have 7 / 1.6 = 4 characters left for some randomness. If your random keys have 64 characters you'll have 64^4 = 16 million possibilities.
PHP doesn't have a native base 32 function available but you can write one yourself, the outline is the same as base64 except you take 7 bits at a time instead of 8.

How many bytes are unique enough for twitter?

I don't want my database id's to be sequential, so I'm trying to generate uids with this code:
$bin = openssl_random_pseudo_bytes(12);
$hex = bin2hex($bin);
return base_convert($hex, 16, 36);
My question is: how many bytes would i need to make the ids unique enough to handle large amounts of records (like twitter)?
Use PHP's uniqid(), with an added entropy factor. That'll give you plenty of room.
You might considering something like the way tinyurl and other shortening services work. I've used similar techniques, which guarantees uniqueness until all combinations are exhausted. So basically you choose an alphabet, and how many characters you want as a length. Let's say we use alphanumeric, upper and lower, so that's 62 characters in the alphabet, and let's do 5 characters per code. That's 62^5 = 916,132,832 combinations.
You start with your sequential database ID and you multiply that be some prime number (choose one that's fairly large, like 2097593). All you do is multiply that by your database ID, making sure to wrap around if you exceed 62^5, and then convert that number to base-62 as per your chosen alphabet.
This makes each code look fairly unique, yet because we use a prime number, we're guaranteed not to hit the same number twice until we've used all codes already. And it's very short.
You can use longer keys with a smaller alphabet, too, if length isn't a concern.
Here's a question I asked along the same lines: Tinyurl-style unique code: potential algorithm to prevent collisions
Assuming that openssl_random_pseudo_bytes may generate every possible value, N bytes will give you 2 ^ (N * 8) distinct values. For 12 bytes this is 7.923 * 10^28
use MySQL UUID
insert into `database`(`unique`,`data`) values(UUID(),'Test');
If your not using MySQL search google for UUID (Database Name) and it will give you an option
Source Wikipedia
In other words, only after generating 1 billion UUIDs every second for the next 100 years, the probability of creating just one duplicate would be about 50%

Categories