i have 3 tables that looks like this:
game_table
+---------+------------+------------+----------------------+----------+
| game_id | game_title | sponser_id | game expiration date | prize_id |
+---------+------------+------------+----------------------+----------+
prize_table
+----------+---------------------------+------------+-------------+--------------------+--------------------------------------------+
| prize_id | prize_image_name | prize_cost | prize_title | remaining_quantity | prize_description |
+----------+---------------------------+------------+-------------+--------------------+--------------------------------------------+
sponser_table
+------------+--------------+
| sponser_id | sponser_name |
+------------+--------------+
how do i build query that select all data from the 3 tables that
meat the statement that go's something like pseudo code:
select all data from game_table and prize_table and sponser_table where game_table.sponser_id = 2 and game_table.prize_id = 2
i tried something like this :
SELECT game_list.*, prize_list.* ,sponser_list.* FROM game_list, prize_list,sponser_list
WHERE game_list.sponser_id=2 And game_list.prize_id = 2 And game_list.game_id=2 ;
but it gave me no good results .
You had a WHERE clause to limit to the correct ids, but you had no join conditions to relate your tables. Instead of the implicit join syntax you attempted (comma-separated table list), use a explicit JOINs with stated relating columns:
SELECT
game_list.*,
prize_list.* ,
sponser_list.*
FROM
game_list
JOIN prize_list ON game_list.prize_id = prize_list.prize_id
JOIN sponser_list ON game_list.sponser_id = sponser_list.sponser_id
WHERE game_list.sponser_id=2 And game_list.prize_id = 2 And game_list.game_id=2 ;
I would recommend against selecting all columns from each table though, since you are duplicating the id columns in at least two places. Instead, be explicit about the columns you want. This will also help you if you later add additional columns to these tables that should not be included in this query.
SELECT
game_id,
game_title,
game_list.sponser_id,
game_expiration_date,
game_list.prize_id,
prize_image_name,
prize_cost,
prize_title,
remaining_quantity,
prize_description,
sponser_name
FROM
game_list
JOIN prize_list ON game_list.prize_id = prize_list.prize_id
JOIN sponser_list ON game_list.sponser_id = sponser_list.sponser_id
WHERE game_list.sponser_id=2 And game_list.prize_id = 2 And game_list.game_id=2 ;
SELECT *
FROM game_table
JOIN prize_table USING (prize_id)
JOIN sponser_table USING (sponser_id)
WHERE sponser_id = 2
AND prize_id = 2
AND game_id = 2
SELECT
game_list.*, prize_list.* ,sponser_list.*
FROM game_list
JOIN prize_list ON game_list.prize_id = prize_list.prize_id
JOIN sponser_list ON game_list.sponser_id = sponser_list.sponser_id
WHERE
game_list.sponser_id=2 And game_list.prize_id = 2 And game_list.game_id=2 ;
From your description it appears that the tables may be related. If they are, you need to use a join, like this:
SELECT *
FROM game_table g
LEFT OUTER JOIN prize_table p ON p.prize_id=g.prize_id
LEFT OUTER JOIN sponser_table s ON s.sponser_id=g.sponser_id
WHERE g.game_id=2
Related
I am working on a photography project and I am facing a bit issue with joining tables and retrieving data from mysql database.
I have created two tables for this project. One table named cm_team is for team members and another table named cm_events for photography events..Assume to shoot a event, we require 6 persons and the id of the person is stored in cm_events table.
As you can see from the above images.. I am storing the id's of members of cm_team in cm_events table.. I wish to obtain the name of the team member in the respective highlighted fields in the cm_events table..Any help is highly appreciated.
for example my desired output should be: instead of 5 under team_lead heading, I should get the name corresponding to 5 i.e Arjun
Something like this? (cleaner and faster than subqueries)
SELECT
`event`.client_name,
`event`.client_number,
# some more event cols ..
`team_lead`.`cm_name` AS `team_lead`,
`candid_photo`.`cm_name` AS `candid_photo`,
`candid_video`.`cm_name` AS `candid_video`,
`traditional_photo`.`cm_name` AS `traditional_photo`,
`traditional_video`.`cm_name` AS `traditional_video`,
`helper`.`cm_name` AS `helper`
FROM cm_events `event`
JOIN cm_team `team_lead` ON `team_lead`.`cm_code` = `event`.`team_lead`
JOIN cm_team `candid_photo` ON `candid_photo`.`cm_code` = `event`.`candid_photo`
JOIN cm_team `candid_video` ON `candid_video`.`cm_code` = `event`.`candid_video`
JOIN cm_team `traditional_photo` ON `traditional_photo`.`cm_code` = `event`.`traditional_photo`
JOIN cm_team `traditional_video` ON `traditional_video`.`cm_code` = `event`.`traditional_video`
JOIN cm_team `helper` ON `helper`.`cm_code` = `event`.`helper`
With Sub queries
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS T,t1;
CREATE TABLE T (
id int, name varchar(10));
insert into t values
(1 , 'aaa'),
(2 , 'bbb');
create table t1 (
id int, team_lead int,team_a int);
insert into t1 values
(1,1,2),
(2,2,2);
select t1.id, (select t.name from t where t.id = t1.team_lead) team_lead,
(select t.name from t where t.id = t1.team_a) team_a
from t1;
+------+-----------+--------+
| id | team_lead | team_a |
+------+-----------+--------+
| 1 | aaa | bbb |
| 2 | bbb | bbb |
+------+-----------+--------+
2 rows in set (0.001 sec)
The question has been resolved. But if you have a "better" or another way to do it then feel free to add a comment! Thanks all for reading! :)
I'm trying to make a dynamic query. Everything is working perfectly except for one thing. I've Google'd for days but I can't figure out how I can make the following work;
SELECT project.name, project.description, track.name, track.description
, SDG.position, SDG.title, SDG.description
, sprint_numbers.number, sprint_options.option
, resources.name, resources.description
, URLs.URL
FROM project INNER JOIN track ON project.track_id = track.id
INNER JOIN project_SDG ON project.id = project_SDG.project_id
INNER JOIN SDG ON project_SDG.SDG_id = SDG.id
INNER JOIN sprint ON sprint.project_id = project.id
INNER JOIN sprint_numbers ON sprint_numbers.id = sprint.sprint_number_id
INNER JOIN sprint_options ON sprint_options.id = sprint.sprint_option_id
INNER JOIN resources ON project.id = resources.project_id
INNER JOIN URLs ON URLs.id = resources.id
WHERE 1=1
AND MATCH (project.name) AGAINST (:name_project)
AND MATCH (project.description) AGAINST (:description_project)
AND SDG.id = :SDG_1
AND SDG.id = :SDG_2
The query executes but does not return anything. The problem is that the SDG.id can't be true to both :SDG_1 and :SDG_2.
Using the OR operator works, but that does not return it the way I want. It must "act" as an AND operator. (:SDG_1 & :SDG_2 are the names of the PHP variables that bind to the SQL statement parameters.)
The query should filter for both values. The values given to :SDG_1 and :SDG_2 must both exist in the SDG.id column of the project_SDG table. If the value of :SDG_1 exists, but :SDG_2 not, then the query should not return anything.
I found this on StackOverflow but it did not work for me: SELECTING with multiple WHERE conditions on same column
I hope someone can help me out.
EDIT: minimal reproducible example
QUERY:
SELECT * FROM project
INNER JOIN project_SDG ON project.id = project_SDG.project_id
INNER JOIN SDG ON project_SDG.SDG_id = SDG.id
WHERE SDG.id = 1 AND SDG.id = 7 AND SDG.id = 14 AND SDG.id = 17
Project table
+------------------+---------------------------+------------+
| id name | description | track_id |
+------------------+---------------------------+------------+
| 1 project name | This is a description 2 | |
+------------------+---------------------------+------------+
SDG table
+-----+-----------+-------------+---------------------------------------------+
| id | position | title | description |
+-----+-----------+-------------+---------------------------------------------+
| 1 | 1 | SDG 1 to 17 | There're multiple SDGs ranging from 1 to 17 |
| 17 | 17 | SDG 1 to 17 | There're multiple SDGs ranging from 1 to 17 |
+-----+-----------+-------------+---------------------------------------------+
project.SDG (bridge-table)
+------------+--------+
| project.id | SDG.id |
+------------+--------+
| 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 |
| 1 | 3 |
+------------+--------+
You want for each project.id both values :SDG_1 and :SDG_2 to exist for SDG.id, so use this in the WHERE clause:
WHERE 1=1
AND MATCH (project.name) AGAINST (:name_project)
AND MATCH (project.description) AGAINST (:description_project)
AND project.id IN (
SELECT project_id
FROM project_SDG
WHERE SDG_id IN (:SDG_1, :SDG_2)
GROUP BY project_id
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT SDG_id) = 2
)
Could you provide a minimal reproducible example for your query?
Generally speaking, one field cannot be equal to two different values in the same time. So, you have either mixed up the logical operators or you need two different fields.
I can assume that in your case there may be several related records with different values. In this case, you need to join the same table twice with different aliases. Let's say as SDG1 and SDG2. After that you can compare
... `SDG1`.id = :SDG_1 AND `SDG2`.id = :SDG_2
Update:
The win trick is groupping. You can enumerate all required SDG IDs and count how many of them is in group. Just for example in case of two IDs:
SELECT project.id
FROM project
JOIN project_SDG ON project_SDG.project_id = project.id
JOIN SDG ON SDG.id = project_SDG.SDG_id
WHERE SDG.id IN(1,2)
GROUP BY project.id
HAVING COUNT(*) = 2
See my sandbox here: https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/pixe3Zcs75Mq2PyCYPk913/0
If you need all project's fields, you have to put this into sub-query as
... WHERE id IN ( subquery here )
Subquery example: https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/pixe3Zcs75Mq2PyCYPk913/1
I have already answered here, but I have another approch.
1. Find bunch of IDs assotiated with some project
To find project IDs we can test lonely pivot table without any join:
SELECT project_id FROM project_SDG
WHERE SDG_id IN(1,2,6)
GROUP BY project_id HAVING COUNT(*) = 3
it gives us list of Project IDs
2. Access all project fields and add extra conditions
SELECT project.*
FROM project
JOIN (
SELECT project_id FROM project_SDG
WHERE SDG_id IN(1,2,6)
GROUP BY project_id HAVING COUNT(*) = 3
) AS ids ON ids.project_id = project.id
WHERE
MATCH(project.name) AGAINST ('project') AND
MATCH(project.description) AGAINST ('sit')
you can play with it here: https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/pixe3Zcs75Mq2PyCYPk913/3
3. Prepare query on the PHP side
I will use known technique to prepare SQL statement.
$ids = [1, 2, 6]; // it can come from request parameters
$text1 = 'project';
$text2 = 'sit';
// build ?,?,?,... pattern
$qmarks = implode(',', array_fill(0, count($ids), '?'));
// Use SQL query above
$sth = $dbh->prepare("
SELECT project.*
FROM project
JOIN (
SELECT project_id FROM project_SDG
WHERE SDG_id IN({$qmarks})
GROUP BY project_id HAVING COUNT(*) = ?
) AS ids ON ids.project_id = project.id
WHERE
MATCH(project.name) AGAINST (?) AND
MATCH(project.description) AGAINST (?)
");
$sth->execute(array_merge($ids, [count($ids), $text1, $text2]));
$records = $sth->fetchAll();
I have these two tables - user_schedules and user_schedule_meta, shown below:
------------------------------------
| id | scheduler_id | status |
------------------------------------
1 3 pending
2 5 active
3 6 active
and
----------------------------------------------
| id | user_schedule_id | meta_key |meta_value
----------------------------------------------
1 3 course-id 135
2 3 session-id 15
3 3 schedule-id 120
I want to write a query to enable me select, for example, from both tables where EVERYONE of the below 5 conditions are met:
user_schedule_id = 3
scheduler_id = 6
session_id = 15
course-id = 135
schedule-id = 120
This is what I have so far, but it is not working:
SELECT user_schedule_meta.`id` FROM user_schedule_meta, user_schedules
WHERE user_schedules.`scheduler_id` = 6
AND user_schedules.id = user_schedule_meta.`user_schedule_id`
AND (
(user_schedule_meta.`meta_key` = 'course-id' AND user_schedule_meta.`meta_value` = 135)
OR (user_schedule_meta.`meta_key` = 'session-id' AND user_schedule_meta.`meta_value` = 15)
OR (user_schedule_meta.`meta_key` = 'daily-schedule-id' AND user_schedule_meta.`meta_value` = 120)
)
GROUP BY user_schedule_meta.`id`
Any suggestions what I am not doing right?
This is a typical key-value store lookup problem. These are trickier than they look in SQL, in that they require multiple JOIN operations.
You need a virtual table with one row per user_schedules.id value, then you can filter it. So
SELECT u.id, u.scheduler_id
FROM user_schedules u
JOIN user_schedule_meta a ON u.id=a.user_schedule_id AND a.meta_key='course-id'
JOIN user_schedule_meta b ON u.id=b.user_schedule_id AND b.meta_key='session-id'
JOIN user_schedule_meta c ON u.id=c.user_schedule_id AND c.meta_key='daily-schedule-id'
WHERE a.meta_value = 135 -- value associated with course-id
AND b.meta_value=15 -- value associated with session-id
AND c.meta_value=120 -- value associated with daily-schedule-id
Notice also that you can list your table with associated attributes like this. This trick of joining the key/value table multiple times is a kind of pivot operation. I use LEFT JOIN because it will allow the result set to show rows where an attribute is missing.
SELECT u.id, u.scheduler_id, u.status,
a.meta_value AS course_id,
b.meta_value AS session_id,
c.meta_value AS daily_schedule_id
FROM user_schedules u
LEFT JOIN user_schedule_meta a ON u.id=a.user_schedule_id AND a.meta_key='course-id'
LEFT JOIN user_schedule_meta b ON u.id=b.user_schedule_id AND b.meta_key='session-id'
LEFT JOIN user_schedule_meta c ON u.id=c.user_schedule_id AND c.meta_key='daily-schedule-id'
try this is code
select * from user_schedule_meta where user_schedule_id=3 and
(meta_key='session-id' AND meta_value=15
or meta_key='daily-schedule-id' AND meta_value=120
or meta_key='course-id' AND meta_value=135
)
I have two tables that hold information about a drawing that I join in my query. The first table contains the drawings unique number, title and who it was drawn by. The second table contains the revision and the date the drawing was revised.
Table 1
|dwg_id|project_no|sws_dwg_no|dwg_title|dwg_by|
|1 |153 |153-100 |Pipe... |JS |
Table 2
|dwg_id|dwg_rev|dwg_date |rev_id|
|1 |A |2015-07-15 11:00:00 |1 |
|1 |B |2015-07-23 12:00:00 |2 |
|1 |C |2015-08-06 10:00:00 |3 |
I want join the two tables and only show the most recent revision change for a drawing.
This is my current query.
SELECT
`drawings`.`dwg_id`,
`project_no`,
`sws_dwg_no`,
`client_dwg_no`,
`dwg_title`,
`dwg_by`,
`dwg_rev`.`dwg_rev`,
`dwg_rev`.`dwg_date`,
MAX(`dwg_rev`.`dwg_rev`) AS dwg_rev
FROM
(`drawings`)
JOIN `dwg_rev` ON `drawings`.`dwg_id` = `dwg_rev`.`dwg_id`
WHERE
`project_no` = '153'
GROUP BY
`sws_dwg_no`,
`dwg_rev`.`dwg_rev`
ORDER BY
`dwg_rev`.`dwg_date` ASC,
`dwg_rev`.`dwg_rev` ASC
The results that this query returns doesn't contain the latest revision numbers or it returns all the revision for each drawing.
You can use the following query:
SELECT d.*, dr.*
FROM drawings AS d
INNER JOIN (
SELECT dwg_id, MAX(rev_id) AS maxRevId
FROM dwg_rev
GROUP BY dwg_id
) AS t ON d.dwg_id = t.dwg_id
INNER JOIN dwg_rev AS dr ON t.dwg_id = dr.dwg_id AND t.maxRevId = dr.rev_id
WHERE project_no = 153
The key point in the above query is the usage of a derived table that returns the latest revision, i.e. MAX(rev_id), per dwg_id. Using an INNER JOIN on that derived table you get back exactly this row out of dwg_rev table.
Using something like the above is necessary if you have multiple dwg_id per project_no. In this case, the above query will fetch the most recent revision per drawing for project_no = 153.
Demo here
Sometimes MAX isn't the best way to go, instead use LIMIT Try this:
SELECT
`drawings`.`dwg_id`,
`project_no`,
`sws_dwg_no`,
`client_dwg_no`,
`dwg_title`,
`dwg_by`,
`dwg_rev`.`dwg_rev`,
`dwg_rev`.`dwg_date`,
`dwg_rev`.`dwg_rev` AS dwg_rev
FROM
(`drawings`)
JOIN `dwg_rev` ON `drawings`.`dwg_id` = `dwg_rev`.`dwg_id`
WHERE
`project_no` = '153'
GROUP BY
`sws_dwg_no`,
`dwg_rev`.`dwg_rev`
ORDER BY
`dwg_rev`.`dwg_date` DESC,
`dwg_rev`.`dwg_rev` DESC
LIMIT 1;
If you need the latest revision you should order DESC check code below.
and also you can order only by dwg_rev.rev_id` DESC , if this rev_id is populated.
SELECT
drawings.dwg_id,
project_no,
sws_dwg_no,
client_dwg_no,
dwg_title,
dwg_by,
dwg_rev.dwg_rev,
dwg_rev.dwg_date,
MAX(dwg_rev.dwg_rev) AS dwg_rev
FROM
(drawings)
JOINdwg_revONdrawings.dwg_id=dwg_rev.dwg_id
WHERE
project_no= '153'
GROUP BY
sws_dwg_no,
dwg_rev.dwg_rev
ORDER BY
dwg_rev.dwg_dateDESC,
dwg_rev.dwg_revDESC
LIMIT 1;
I have several tables with different numbers and types of columns, and a single column in common.
+--------+---------+------------+-------------+
| person | beardID | beardStyle | beardLength |
+--------+---------+------------+-------------+
+--------+-------------+----------------+
| person | moustacheID | moustacheStyle |
+--------+-------------+----------------+
I want to fetch all the results that match a given value of the shared column. I can do it using multiple select statements like this:
SELECT * FROM beards WHERE person = "bob"
and
SELECT * FROM moustaches WHERE person = "bob"
But this requires multiple mysql API calls, which seems inefficient. I was hoping I could use UNION ALL to get all the results in a single API call, but UNION requires that the tables have the same number and similar type of columns. I could write a SELECT statement that would manually pad the results from each table by adding columns with NULL values, but that would quickly get unmanageable for a few more tables with a few more columns.
I'm looking for a result set roughly like this:
+--------+---------+------------+-------------+-------------+----------------+
| person | beardID | beardStyle | beardLength | moustacheID | moustacheStyle |
+--------+---------+------------+-------------+-------------+----------------+
| bob | 1 | rasputin | 1 | | |
+--------+---------+------------+-------------+-------------+----------------+
| bob | 2 | samson | 12 | | |
+--------+---------+------------+-------------+-------------+----------------+
| bob | | | | 1 | fu manchu |
+--------+---------+------------+-------------+-------------+----------------+
Is there a way to achieve this that's fast and maintainable? Or am I better off running a separate query for each table?
Clarification:
I'm not looking for a cartesian product. I don't want a row for every combination of beard-and-moustache, I want a row for every beard and a row for every moustache.
So if there are 3 matching beards and 2 matching moustaches I should get 5 rows, not 6.
this should be working fine:
SELECT * FROM `beards` b LEFT OUTER JOIN `mustaches` ON (0) WHERE person = "bob"
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM `beards` b RIGHT OUTER JOIN `mustaches` ON (0) WHERE person = "bob"
you don't have to handle the columns by yourself. the left and right outer join do this job.
unfortunately mysql doesn't have a full join. that's why you have to do it this way with a union
SELECT * FROM `customer` b LEFT OUTER JOIN `charges` ON (0) LEFT OUTER JOIN `day` ON (0)
UNION
SELECT * FROM `customer` b RIGHT OUTER JOIN `charges` ON (0) LEFT OUTER JOIN `day` ON (0)
UNION
SELECT * FROM `customer` b LEFT OUTER JOIN `charges` ON (0) RIGHT OUTER JOIN `day` ON (0)
this is a local test i made
Join on person....
I.e.
Select
t1.(asterix), t2.(asterix)
FROM
beards t1
INNER JOIN
moustaches t2 On t2.person = t1.person
SELECT *
FROM beards
JOIN moustaches
ON moustaches.person = beards.person
WHERE person = "bob"
I had fun with this, not sure it's entirely manageable with what more you have to add, but it accomplished the goal.
create table beard (
person varchar(20)
,beardID int
,beardStyle varchar(20)
,beardLength int )
create table moustache(
person varchar(20)
,moustacheID int
,moustacheStyle varchar(20))
insert into beard
select 'bob', 1, 'rasputin', 1
union select 'bob', 2, 'samson', 12
insert into moustache
select 'bob', 1, 'fu manchu'
declare #facialhair table (
person varchar(20)
,beardID int
,beardStyle varchar(20)
,beardLength int
,moustacheID int
,moustacheStyle varchar(20))
declare #i int
declare #name varchar(20)
set #name = 'bob'
set #i = (select COUNT(*) from beard where person = #name)
+ (select COUNT(*) from moustache where person = #name)
print #i
while #i > 0
begin
insert into #facialhair (person, beardID, beardStyle, beardLength)
select person, beardID, beardStyle, beardLength
from beard
where person = #name
set #i = #i-##ROWCOUNT
insert into #facialhair (person, moustacheID, moustacheStyle)
select person, moustacheID, moustacheStyle
from moustache
where person = #name
set #i = #i-##ROWCOUNT
end
select *
from #facialhair
I think you would be better by making queries for data in each table.
One of other possibilities is to concatenate data from all columns into one big string (you could choose some sign to separete column's values), then you should be able to use union all clause to combine results from each query - but then you will have to parse each row.. And data types will be lost.