I'm trying to determine whether or not a given object has been created. I see there are methods for class_exists and method_exists but what I'm trying to figure out is if new Foo() has been called (and hopefully figure out what variable it was assigned to, but that is not as important).
If I understand you correctly you are trying to initialize object only once. If this is the case why not to use singleton pattern? This will free you from checking of existence of object:
class MyClass {
private static $instance;
private function __construct() {}
public static function getInstance() {
if (empty(self::$instance)) {
self::$instance = new __CLASS__();
}
return self::$instance;
}
}
You can use this code like this:
$obj = MyClass::getInstance();
With similar approach you can define additional helper static methods which will check whether object was instantiated or not. You just need to keep instance statically inside your class.
Edit: After seeing the reason you are needing this in the comments above, this is definitely not the way to go about it.
Here ya go. It could be optimized a little, but should work fine.
Also, passing get_defined_vars() to the function every time is necessary because that function only retrieves the vars within the scope it's called. Calling it inside the function would only give the vars within the scope of that function.
<?php
function isClassDeclared($class_name, $vars, $return_var_name = FALSE) {
foreach ($vars AS $name => $val) {
if (is_object($val) && $val instanceof $class_name)
return $return_var_name ? $name : TRUE;
}
return FALSE;
}
class Foo {}
$foo = new Foo;
echo '<pre>';
var_dump(isClassDeclared('foo', get_defined_vars(), TRUE));
var_dump(isClassDeclared('bar', get_defined_vars(), TRUE));
echo '</pre>';
Related
I have a very simple class:
class MyClass
{
public function someFunction()
{
echo array_key_exists( 'dynamicVariable', $GLOBALS ) ? 'true' : 'false';
}
}
I want to define a variable 'on the fly' inside 'someFunction', but I can't seem to figure out how to do this inside function scope.
$classInstance = new MyClass();
$varName = 'dynamicVariable';
$classInstance->$varName;
What I want to do:
$classInstance = new MyClass();
$varName = 'dynamicVariable';
$classInstance->functionScopeReference->$varName;
$classInstance->myFunction(); <-- this will print TRUE
How can do the same thing, but define it in someFunction scope, instead of MyClass scope? Thanks
Posting as a community wiki in order to satisfy the OP, since dbf hasn't posted the comment to close the question.
"Short answer, you can't from outside of the methods scope, unless the variable is a property used inside any method. – dbf"
...
"#dbf thank you! you can post this comment as an answer and I will mark it – 0x29a"
By using the $this keyword... I would suggest a good 101 course on object oriented programming which should explain scope better then I could...
class MyClass
{
public function someFunction($foo)
{
$this->dynamicVariable = $foo;
}
}
$classInstance = new MyClass();
$classInstance->someFunction('dynamicVariable');
echo $classInstance->dynamicVariable;
EDIT: to better answer OP's question (sorry for not reading that correctly!): although it does not change scope, a workaround would be to use getters and setters and make your properties private:
class MyClass
{
private $property_one; // can't access this without using the getPropertyOne function
private $property_two;
public function setPropertyOne($bool)
{
$this->property_one = $bool;
}
public function getPropertyOne()
{
return $this->property_one;
}
public function setPropertyTwo($bool)
{
$this->property_two = $bool;
}
public function getPropertyTwo()
{
return $this->property_two;
}
}
$classInstance = new MyClass();
// trying to access the properties without using the functions results in an error
echo $classInstance->property_one;
$classInstance->setPropertyOne(true);
echo $classInstance->getPropertyOne();
$classInstance->setPropertyTwo(false);
echo $classInstance->getPropertyTwo();
I'm trying to dynamically create the base for a DB entity generalization for a project I'm working on. I basically want to dynamically create a set of standard methods and tools for the properties in any class that extends this. Much like the tools you get for free with Python/Django.
I got the idea from this guy: http://www.stubbles.org/archives/65-Extending-objects-with-new-methods-at-runtime.html
So I've implemented the __call function as described in the post above,
public function __call($method, $args) {
echo "<br>Calling ".$method;
if (isset($this->$method) === true) {
$func = $this->$method;
$func();
}
}
I have a function which gives me the objects public/protected properties through get_object_vars,
public function getJsonData() {
$var = get_object_vars($this);
foreach($var as &$value) {
if (is_object($value) && method_exists($value, 'getJsonData')) {
$value = $value->getJsonData;
}
}
return $var;
}
and now I want to create some methods for them:
public function __construct() {
foreach($this->getJsonData() as $name => $value) {
// Create standard getter
$methodName = "get".$name;
$me = $this;
$this->$methodName = function() use ($me, $methodName, $name) {
echo "<br>".$methodName." is called";
return $me->$name;
};
}
}
Thanks to Louis H. which pointed out the "use" keyword for this down below.
This basically creates an anonymous function on the fly. The function is callable, but it is no longer within the context of it's object. It produces a "Fatal error: Cannot access protected property"
Unfortunately I'm bound to PHP version 5.3, which rules out Closure::bind. The suggested solution in Lazy loading class methods in PHP will therefore not work here.
I'm rather stumped here... Any other suggestions?
Update
Edited for brevity.
Try it like this (you have to make the variables you'll need available to the method)
$this->$methodName = function() use ($this, $methodName, $name){
echo "<br>".$methodName." is called";
return $this->$$name;
};
You should have access to the object context through $this.
Instead of updating the original question above, I include the complete solution here for anybody struggling with the same issues:
First of all, since the closure cannot have real object access, I needed to include the actual value with the "use" declaration when creating the closure function (see original __construct function above):
$value =& $this->$name;
$this->$methodName = function() use ($me, $methodName, &$value) {
return $value;
};
Secondly the __call magic method did not just need to call the closure function, it needed also to return any output from it. So instead of just calling $func(), I return $func();
This did the trick! :-)
I try to create some sort of setup class, like global values for the page.
The PHP-code
class globals
{
public $page;
public function __construct()
{
}
public function set_page($value)
{
$this->page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
}
class get
{
public function page()
{
$globals = new globals();
return $globals->page;
}
}
$globals = new globals();
$globals->set_page('My value');
echo get::page(); // Short function to be in a template
Question
My class forget the value I set. Why is that?
Do I have to use global variables?
Is this the correct approach for the problem?
The variable is set on an object, not on a class.
For each class, you can instantiate multiple objects. Each of those have their own variable scope.
Edit:
I forgot to include the easiest, and least verbose solution to your problem. AFAIK, you're looking for a way to check what page you're on. Constants will do just that:
defined('MY_CURRENT_PAGE') || define('MY_CURRENT_PAGE','My Value');
//use anywhere like so:
echo 'Currently on page: '.MY_CURRENT_PAGE;
My class forget the value I set. Why is that?
Quite simple: your page member function isn't static, yet you call it as though it is: get::page(). Even if you were to fix this, you're creating a new instance in the page method, but you're not preserving a reference too it anywhere, so each page call will create a new globals instance, that has nothing set.
Do I have to use global variables?
No, unless you're Really desperate, never use globals
Is this the correct approach for the problem?
No, if it doesn't work, it's not correct (IMHO).
Well, what is, you might ask. There are several ways to go about this:
class globals
{
public static $page = null;//make this static, meaning all instances will share this var
public function set_page($value)
{
self::$page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
}
class get
{
private $_globalsInstance = null;
public function __construct(globals $instance = null)
{
$this->_globalsInstance = $instance;
}
private function _getGlobals()
{
if (!$this->_globalsInstance instanceof globals)
{
$this->_globalsInstance = new globals();
}
return $this->_globalsInstance;
}
public function page()
{
return $this->_getGlobals()::$page;
}
}
Personally, however, I wouldn't work like this, I'd just pass my instances to wherever I need them (as arguments to functions/methods or just instantiate them in a scope that will be accessible:
class globals
{
public $page = null;//make this static, meaning all instances will share this var
public function set_page($value)
{
$this->page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
}
$page = new globals();
$page->set_page('foobar');
someFunction($page);
$someObject->renderPage($page);
require_once('specificScript.php');
//inside required script:
echo $page->page;
Do I have to use global variables?
Not, if your can use PHP 5.3
Is this the correct approach for the problem?
Better to use a generic class for this, or use static properties of objects
<?php
class globals
{
public static $page;
public function __construct()
{
}
public function set_page($value)
{
self::$page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
}
class get
{
public static function page()
{
return globals::$page;
}
}
$globals = new globals();
$globals->set_page('My value');
echo get::page(); // Short function to be in a template
P.S.
But this is not a nice approach
$globals there
class get
{
public function page()
{
$globals = new globals();
return $globals->page;
}
}
and there
$globals = new globals();
$globals->set_page('My value');
are different inctances of globals class.
One of the solutions is to make $page var static
public static $page;
I hope this helps
UPD:
Also you might apply Singleton to globals class and request for its insnance instead of creating new one directly:
globals::getInstance()->setPage('Page');
and
return globals::getInstance()->getPage();
In this case $page doesn't have to be static.
I'm not sure the other answers are very clear. You have created 2 classes. As such they have different scopes. As writen you can't access the original variable $page from the get class because it's outside the scope. Your page function in fact creates a new version of the object $globals without $page set. Normally you would place both your set and get functions in the initial object/class. Though it would be possible to use two class by calling the first class from the second and setting the page. Why you would want to do that I'm not sure.
if I were writing the class it would look like this.
class globals
{
public $page;
public function __construct()
{
}
public function set_page($value)
{
$this->page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
public function get_page()
{
return $this->page;
}
}
Actually I would probably set page to private not public. As public I guess you don't need a get function.
for using methods of the class without object you must use static definition. but anyway you put value for one class object and try to get it from another...
Perhaps this will help you continue on your coarse:
class globals
{
public static $page;
public function set_page($value)
{
self::$page = $value; // Maybe from a database
}
}
class get extends globals
{
public function page()
{
$globals = new globals();
return parent::$page;
}
}
$globals = new globals();
$globals->set_page('My value');
echo get::page();
?>
I'd like to do something like this:
public static function createDynamic(){
$mydynamicvar = 'module';
self::$mydynamicvar = $value;
}
and be able to access the property from within the class with
$value = self::$module;
I don't know exactly why you would want to do this, but this works. You have to access the dynamic 'variables' like a function because there is no __getStatic() magic method in PHP yet.
class myclass{
static $myvariablearray = array();
public static function createDynamic($variable, $value){
self::$myvariablearray[$variable] = $value;
}
public static function __callstatic($name, $arguments){
return self::$myvariablearray[$name];
}
}
myclass::createDynamic('module', 'test');
echo myclass::module();
static variables must be part of the class definition, so you can't create them dynamically. Not even with Reflection:
chuck at manchuck dot com 2 years ago
It is important to note that calling ReflectionClass::setStaticPropertyValue will not allow you to add new static properties to a class.
But this looks very much like a XY Problem. You probably don't really want to add static properties to a PHP class at runtime; you have some use case that could be fulfilled also that way. Or that way would be the fastest way, were it available, to fulfill some use case. There well might be other ways.
Actually the use cases below are yet again possible solutions to some higher level problem. It might be worth it to reexamine the high level problem and refactor/rethink it in different terms, maybe skipping the need of meddling with static properties altogether.
I want a dictionary of properties inside my class.
trait HasDictionary {
private static $keyValueDictionary = [ ];
public static function propget($name) {
if (!array_key_exists($name, static::$keyValueDictionary) {
return null;
}
return static::$keyValueDictionary[$name];
}
public static function propset($name, $value) {
if (array_key_exists($name, static::$keyValueDictionary) {
$prev = static::$keyValueDictionary[$name];
} else {
$prev = null;
}
static::$keyValueDictionary[$name] = $value;
return $prev;
}
}
class MyClass
{
use Traits\HasDictionary;
...$a = self::propget('something');
self::propset('something', 'some value');
}
I want to associate some values to a class, or: I want a dictionary of properties inside some one else's class.
This actually happened to me and I found this question while investigating ways of doing it. I needed to see, in point B of my workflow, in which point ("A") a given class had been defined, and by what other part of code. In the end I stored that information into an array fed by my autoloader, and ended up being able to also store the debug_backtrace() at the moment of class first loading.
// Solution: store values somewhere else that you control.
class ClassPropertySingletonMap {
use Traits\HasDictionary; // same as before
public static function setClassProp($className, $prop, $value) {
return self::propset("{$className}::{$prop}", $value);
}
public static function getClassProp($className, $prop) {
return self::propget("{$className}::{$prop}");
}
}
// Instead of
// $a = SomeClass::$someName;
// SomeClass::$someName = $b;
// we'll use
// $a = ClassPropertySingletonMap::getClassProp('SomeClass','someName');
// ClassPropertySingletonMap::setClassProp('SomeClass','someName', $b);
I want to change, not create, an existing property of a class.
// Use Reflection. The property is assumed private, for were it public
// you could do it as Class::$property = $whatever;
function setPrivateStaticProperty($class, $property, $value) {
$reflector = new \ReflectionClass($class);
$reflector->getProperty($property)->setAccessible(true);
$reflector->setStaticPropertyValue($property, $value);
$reflector->getProperty($property)->setAccessible(false);
}
Static properties must be defined in the class definition. Therefore, real static properties cannot be created dynamically like regular properties.
For example, if you run this:
<?php
class MyClass
{
public static function createDynamic()
{
$mydynamicvar = 'module';
self::$mydynamicvar = $value;
}
}
MyClass::createDynamic();
var_dump(MyClass::$mydynamicvar);
var_dump(MyClass::$module);
...you'll get this error
Fatal error: Access to undeclared static property: MyClass::$mydynamicvar test.php on line 8
Notice how the error occurs on line 8 when trying to set the property instead of line 14 or 15 (as you might expect if you were simply doing it wrong and dynamically creating static properties was actually possible).
A related problem that IS possible (in PHP 5.4.0 and up) is to include various separate groups of static variable or constant declarations and group them together into one class declaration.
Here is an example:
trait Added1 // This can be located in one Include file
{
static
$x="hello"; // Can declare more variables here
}
trait Added2 // This can be located in another Include file
{
static
$y="world"; // Can declare more variables here
}
class G // Global constant and variable declarations class
{
use Added1, Added2; // Combines all variable declarations
}
echo G::$x." ".G::$y; // Shows "hello world" on the web page
I know you can do this
class Object
{
private $ar;
public function __isset($name)
{
return isset($this->ar[$name]);
}
}
which can then be used to do the following
$obj = new Object();
if (isset($obj->name)) { /* ... */ }
However is there a way to do this
$obj = new Object();
if (isset($obj)) { /* .... */ }
Where i can control the return of $obj status using the __isset() magic method on the object it self.
You could only define a new global function myIsset() or something like it to do this.
function myIsset($obj = NULL)
{
...
}
When checking the variable $obj with isset PHP doesn't interact with the object that might be referenced by the variable at all.
You cannot, because it would not make any sense (at least not in the way isset() is meant to be used). So isset($obj) is always true as long as it points to some object and not NULL/undefined.
Magic method __isset is not intended to be used that way.
According to PHP manual:
"__isset() is triggered by calling isset() or empty() on inaccessible properties."