In a PHP project I have some data I want to sort using a linear time, simple counting sort:
$ar = array(7, 2, 0, 3, 8, 0, 12, 7, 6, 7);
$count = array();
foreach ($ar as $v)
$count[$v]++;
$sorted = array();
foreach ($count as $v => $c)
for ($i = 0; $i < $c; $i++)
$sorted[] = $v;
The problem is that the above obviously doesn't work. The php array works more like a hashmap than an array. The code can be made to work by inserting ksort($count) before the final loop, but ksort runs in O(nlogn) which destroys the entire point.
Is there any way to do a linear time sort in php? Perhaps using some paramter to array(), or some entirely different structure?
You didn't follow the algorithm correctly. This is O(n).
$ar = array(7, 2, 0, 3, 8, 0, 12, 7, 6, 7);
$count = array();
foreach ($ar as $v) {
$count[$v] = isset($count[$v]) ? $count[$v] + 1 : 1;
}
$sorted = array();
$min = min($ar);
$max = max($ar);
for ($i=$min; $i<=$max; $i++) {
if (isset($count[$i])) {
for ($j=0; $j<$count[$i]; $j++) {
$sorted[] = $i;
}
}
}
also, see array_count_values(), or alternatively compute the min and max inside the counting loop.
Approved answer is wrong. Correct:
$ar = array(7, 2, 0, 3, 8, 0, 12, 7, 6, 7);
$count = array();
foreach ($ar as $v) {
$count[$v] = isset($count[$v]) ? $count[$v] + 1 : 1;
}
$sorted = array();
$min = min($ar);
$max = max($ar);
for ($i=$min; $i <= $max; $i++) {
if (isset($count[$i])) {
for ($j=0; $j<$count[$i]; $j++) {
$sorted[] = $i;
}
}
}
If i understand your question AND comment correctly, just using sort($count) would work no?
$ar = array(7, 2, 0, 3, 8, 0, 12, 7, 6, 7);
$sorted = $ar;
sort($sorted);
var_dump($ar);
var_dump($sorted);
Result:
array(7,2,0,3,8,0,12,7,6,7);
array(0,0,2,3,6,7,7,7,8,12);
But i'm wondering what the foreach($ar as $v)$count[$v]++; does... doesn't really make sense...
Adding some comments to the code to show you why this doesn't do what you think it should do.
$ar = array(7, 2, 0, 3, 8, 0, 12, 7, 6, 7);
$count = array();
foreach ($ar as $v) {
// add each number in $ar to $count.
// the first number in $ar is 7, so 7 will be the first number in $count.
// because 7 is in $ar 3 times, $count[7] == 3.
$count[$v]++;
}
// the output of print_r will be very revealing:
print_r($count);
/*Array
(
[7] => 3
[2] => 1
[0] => 2
[3] => 1
[8] => 1
[12] => 1
[6] => 1
)*/
$sorted = array();
foreach ($count as $v => $c) {
// the first entry: $count[7] == 3
// so add 7 to $sorted 3 times.
// the second entry: $count[2] == 1
// so add 2 to $sorted 1 time.
// etc.
for ($i = 0; $i < $c; $i++) {
$sorted[] = $v;
}
}
This simply groups numbers together based on their location in the first array.
To get the sorted $ar in a variable of it's own ($sorted), it's pretty trivial:
$sorted = $ar;
sort($sorted);
Which makes me think that your question and comment is not giving the whole picture.
Edit: Now after you have clarified that you wanted to implement a specific algorithm (and you actually got an answer already that shows some points that were wrong implementing it first), I think it's worth to focus on another aspect of your question:
You're comparing the complexity of two (theoretical) algorithms, but you're leaving aside how the algorithms are implemented.
PHP's sort() - even based on "bad" quicksort, will outrun your own PHP usercode implementation of some other algorithm by numbers.
You just have compared the wrong parameters here. The complexity of a function does not says much when you compare a build-in PHP function with some function in your user-code.
$A = [1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1, 2, 4, 5, 0, 0]; // example array
$m = max($A);
$count = array_fill(0, $m + 1, '0');
foreach ($A as $value) $count[$value] += 1;
// next step is print the numbers
$a = [];
foreach ($count as $key => $value) {
for ($i = 0; $i < $value;) {
array_push($a, $key);;
$i++;
}
}
var_dump($count); // print the sorted array
var_dump($a); // print the numbers (low to high)
Related
I have a sorted array with these stop_ids.
1,
6,
13,
18,
31,
I just want to find given first search value(6) is before the second given value(31). I tried something like this. That means the find order should be, first (6) then (13) not (13) first and (6) then.
foreach ($parent_array as $key => $value) {
$k = $key;
sort($routes); //another array with above values(stop_ids)
$st = 0;
foreach ($routes as $key => $value) {
if($st == 1){
unset($parent_array[$k]);
break;
}
elseif($value->stop_id == 31){
$st = 1;
continue;
}
}
}
return $parent_array;
I can provide two values. Here I used second value(31) only. Any help ???
Get array keys, under which is every number is located and compare this keys:
function firstNumberFirst($array, $first_number, $second_number)
{
return array_search($first_number, $array) < array_search($second_number, $array);
}
$a = [1, 6, 13, 18, 31];
var_dump(
firstNumberFirst($a, 6, 13),
firstNumberFirst($a, 6, 18),
firstNumberFirst($a, 13, 6)
);
If array is not zero-indexed - apply array_values first.
I want to find minimum value from an array and subtract that value from all the elements until all the elements becomes 0. The problem is that if the array contains one of the element as 0 then it doesn't reflect anything. Thanks in advance.
<?php
$handle = fopen ("php://stdin","r");
fscanf($handle,"%d",$n);
$arr_temp = fgets($handle);
$arr = explode(" ",$arr_temp);
array_walk($arr,'intval');
for($j=0;$j<10;$j++)
{
$min = min($arr);
for($i=0;$i<count($arr);$i++)
{
if($arr[$i]>=$min)
$arr[$i]-=$min;
echo $arr[$i]." ";
}
echo "\n";
}
?>
Using array_filter(), plus a function you can get the minimum positive non-zero integer even if an array contains elements whose value is zero, as follows:
<?php
$arr = array(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 0, 5, 6, 4, 3, 2, 1,0);
function getMin( $a ) {
$arr_filtered = array_values(array_filter( $a ));
return min($arr_filtered);
}
$min = getMin( $arr );
$count = count($arr);
while( count( array_unique($arr) ) > 1 ) {
for( $i = 0; $i < $count; $i++)
{
if( $arr[$i] >= $min ){
$arr[$i] -= $min;
echo $arr[$i]." ";
}
}
echo "\n";
}
See demo
Note, the code re-indexes the filtered array in getMin() by using array_values().
As long as the minimum value is one the above script works well. However, if the minimum value were another number, then the code needs to be adjusted. The following script handles a multi-dimensional array composed of four arrays, each with a different minimum value, including one with negative values:
<?php
error_reporting(E_ALL);
$a = [ [0,1, 2, 3, 4, 0, 5, 6, 4, 3, 2, 1,0],
[0, 2, 3, 4, 0, 5, 6, 4, 3, 2, 0],
[0, 3, 4, 0, 5, 6, 7,8,4, 3, 0],
[-1,0,1,2,3,4,2,1,0,-1]
];
function getMin( $a ) {
return min($a);
}
foreach ($a as $arr) {
while( ( $arr != null ) ) {
$arr = array_values(array_filter($arr));
if ($arr == null) {
break;
}
$min = getMin( $arr );
foreach ($arr as &$e) {
$e -= $min;
}
unset($e);
echo join(" ",$arr),"\n";
}
echo "\n";
}
see demo
Note, the second script explicitly filters out the zero values in each array whereas the first script effectively does so. The primary difference between the two scripts is that getMin() needs to be in the while loop so that the subtraction correctly occurs when the minimum number is greater than one or is a negative number.
The script also simplifies the code in several ways. Much more simple condition for the while loop -- works as long as array is not null. The code no longer needs getCount() since I changed the subtraction loop to use a foreach with a reference variable which is subsequently unset -- important to do to avoid problems. This foreach loop also does not require the if conditional of the first script.
It is because you taking each and every time $min = min($arr); value and it became 0 thats why your code is not working.
try below code
$min = min($arr);
for($j=0;$j<=100;$j++)
{
if (count(array_unique($arr)) === 1 && end($arr) === 0) {
break;
}
for($i=0;$i<count($arr);$i++)
{
if($arr[$i] >= $min){
$arr[$i]-=$min;
echo $arr[$i]." ";
}
}
echo "<br>";
}
I do not know much about php but in the first for loop you should check the elements of the array if they are zero or not using if statements e.g if(arr[j]!=0)
for($j=0;$j<10;$j++)
{
if($arr[$j]!=$0)
$min = min($arr);
for($i=0;$i<count($arr);$i++)
{
if($arr[$i]>=$min)
$arr[$i]-=$min;
echo $arr[$i]." ";
}
echo "\n";
}
I have an array. I'd like to get the three highest values of the array, but also remember which part of the array it was in.
For example, if my array is [12,3,7,19,24], my result should be values 24,19,12, at locations 4, 0, 3.
How do I do that? The first part is easy. Getting the locations is difficult.
Secondly, I'd like to also use the top three OR top number after three, if some are tied. So, for example, if I have [18,18,17,17,4], I'd like to display 18, 18, 17, and 17, at location 0,1,2,3.
Does that make sense? Is there an easy way to do that?
Wouldn't you be there using asort()?
For example:
<?php
$list = [4,18,18,17,17];
// Sort maintaining indexes.
asort($list);
// Slice the first 3 elements from the array.
$top3 = array_slice($list, -3, null, true);
// Results in: [ 1 => 18, 2 => 18, 3 => 17 ]
Or you can use arsort
function getMyTop($list, $offset, $top) {
arsort($list);
return array_slice($list, $offset, $top, true);
}
$myTop = getMyTop($list, 0, 3);
$myNextTop = getMyTop($list, 3, 4);
This is what you need!
<?php
$array = array(12,3,7,19,24);
$array_processed = array();
$highest_index = 0;
while($highest_index < 3)
{
$max = max($array);
$index = array_search($max,$array);
$array_processed[$index] = $max;
unset($array[$index]);
$highest_index++;
}
print_r($array_processed);
?>
You will get Index as well as the value! You just have to define how many top values you want! Let me know if it's what you want!
function top_three_positions($array){
// Sort the array from max to min
arsort($array);
// Unset everything in sorted array after the first three elements
$count = 0;
foreach($array as $key => $ar){
if($count > 2){
unset($array[$key]);
}
$count++;
}
// Return array with top 3 values with their indexes preserved.
return $array;
}
You can use a loop to determine how many elements your top-three-with-ties will have, after applying arsort:
function getTop($arr, $num = 3) {
arsort($arr);
foreach(array_values($arr) as $i => $v) {
if ($i >= $num && $v !== $prev) return array_slice($arr, 0, $i, true);
$prev = $v;
}
return $arr;
}
// Sample input
$arr = [4,18,17,6,17,18,9];
$top = getTop($arr, 3);
print_r($top); // [5 => 18, 1 => 18, 4 => 17, 2 => 17]
try this:
public function getTopSortedThree(array $data, $n = 3, $asc = true)
{
if ($asc) {
uasort($data, function ($a, $b) { return $a>$b;});
} else {
uasort($data, function ($a, $b) { return $a<$b;});
}
$count = 0;
$result = [];
foreach ($data as $key => $value) {
$result[] = $data[$key];
$count++;
if ($count >= $n){
break;
}
}
return $result;
}
Send false for desc order and nothing for asc order
Send $n with number of top values you want.
This functionality doesn't losing keys.
This task merely calls for a descending sort, retention of the top three values, and in the case of values after the third-positioned value being equal to the third value, retain these as well.
After calling rsort(), call a for() loop starting from the fourth element ([3]). If the current value is not equal to the value in the third position, stop iterating, and isolate the elements from the front of the array to the previous iteration's index. Done.
p.s. If the input array has 3 or fewer elements, the for() loop is never entered and the whole (short) array avoids truncation after being sorted.
Code: (Demo)
$array = [18, 17, 4, 18, 17, 16, 17];
rsort($array);
for ($i = 3, $count = count($array); $i < $count; ++$i) {
if ($array[2] != $array[$i]) {
$array = array_slice($array, 0, $i);
break;
}
}
var_export($array);
Because the loop purely finds the appropriate finishing point of the array ($i), this could also be compacted to: (Demo)
rsort($array);
for ($i = 3, $count = count($array); $i < $count && $array[2] === $array[$i]; ++$i);
var_export(array_slice($array, 0, $i));
Or slightly reduced further to: (Demo)
rsort($array);
for ($i = 3; isset($array[2], $array[$i]) && $array[2] === $array[$i]; ++$i);
var_export(array_slice($array, 0, $i));
Output:
array (
0 => 18,
1 => 18,
2 => 17,
3 => 17,
4 => 17,
)
Sorry for my bad English and thanks for your help in advance! I have kind of a tricky problem I've encountered while coding. Here's the point:
I need a script that essentially extracts the 5 max values of 5 arrays, that are "mixed", i.e. they contain "recurrent" values. Here is an example:
array1(a, b)
array2(a, c, d, e, g)
array3(b, d, g, h)
array4(e, t, z)
array5(b, c, d, k)
The 2 essential requests are:
1) the sum of those 5 arrays (array1+array2+array3...) MUST be the highest possible...
2) ...without repeat ANY value previously used** (e.g. if in array1 the top value was "b", this cannot be re-used as max value in arrays 3 or 5).
Currently I have this...:
$group1 = array(a, b);
$group = array(a, b, c, d);
$max1a = max(group1);
$max2a = max(group2) unset($max1a);
$sum1 = $max1a + $max2a;
$max2b = max(group2);
$max1b = max(group1)
unset($max2b);
$sum2 = $max1b + $max2b;
if($sum1 > $sum2) {
echo $sum1
} else {
echo $sum2
}
... but it's kinda impossible to use this code with 5 arrays, because I should compare 5! (120...!!!) combinations in order to find the max sum value.
I know the problem is quite difficult to explain and to solve, but I really need your help and I hope you can save me!!!
Cheers
I'm adding this as another answer to leave the previous one intact for someone coming across this looking for that variation on this behaviour.
Given the 2 arrays:
$array1 = array(30, 29, 20);
$array2 = array(30, 20, 10);
The maximum sum using one element from each is 59 - this is dramatically different to my previous approach (and the answers' of others) which took the max element of the first array and then the highest element of the next array that is not equal to any previously used value - this would give 50 instead.
The code you want is this:
$mainArray = array();
$mainArray[] = array(30, 29, 20);
$mainArray[] = array(30, 20, 10);
$tempArray = array();
$newArray = array();
foreach($mainArray as $innerArray) {
$newArray = array();
if (count($tempArray) == 0) {
foreach ($innerArray as $value) {
$newArray[] = array('total' => $value, 'used' => array($value));
}
}
else {
foreach ($tempArray as $key => $innerTempArray) {
$placed = FALSE;
foreach ($innerArray as $value) {
if (!(in_array($value, $innerTempArray['used']))) {
$newArray[] = array('total' => $tempArray[$key]['total'] + $value, 'used' => $tempArray[$key]['used']);
$newArray[count($newArray) - 1]['used'][] = $value;
$placed = TRUE;
}
}
if (!($placed)) {
echo "An array had no elements that had not already been used";
die();
}
}
}
$tempArray = $newArray;
}
$total = 0;
if (count($newArray) == 0) {
echo "No data passed";
die();
}
else {
$total = $newArray[0]['total'];
}
for ($i = 0; $i < count($newArray); $i++) {
if ($newArray[$i]['total'] > $total) {
$total = $newArray[$i]['total'];
}
}
var_dump($total);
EDIT - Do not repeat used variables (but repeated values are ok):
Let
//$a = 30, $b = 30, $c = 25, $d = 20, $e = 19
$array1 = array($a, $c, $d);
$array2 = array($b, $d, $e);
We want to choose $a from $array1 and $b from $array2 as these give the largest sum - although they're values are the same that is allowed because we only care if the names of the variables saved to that place are the same.
With the arrays in the above format there is no way of achieving the desired behaviour - the arrays do not know what the name of the variable who's value was assigned to their elements, only it's value. Therefore we must change the first part of the original answer to:
$mainArray[] = array('a', 'c', 'd');
$mainArray[] = array('b', 'd', 'e');
and also have either the of the following before the first foreach loop (to declare $a, $b, $c, $d, $e)
//either
extract(array(
'a' => 30,
'b' => 30,
'c' => 25,
'd' => 20,
'e' => 19
));
//or
$a = 30; $b = 30; $c = 25; $d = 20; $e = 19;
The above both do exactly the same thing, I just prefer the first for neatness.
Then replace the line below
$newArray[] = array('total' => $value, 'used' => array($value));
with
$newArray[] = array('total' => ${$value}, 'used' => array($value));
The change is curly brackets around the first $value because that is then evaluated to get the variable name to use (like below example):
$test = 'hello';
$var = 'test';
echo ${$var}; //prints 'hello'
A similar change replaces
$newArray[] = array('total' => $tempArray[$key]['total'] + $value, 'used' => $tempArray[$key]['used']);
with
$newArray[] = array('total' => $tempArray[$key]['total'] + ${$value}, 'used' => $tempArray[$key]['used']);
Now the code will function as wanted :)
If you are dynamically building the arrays you are comparing and can't build the array of strings instead of variables then there is no way to do it. You would need some way of extracting "$a" or "a" from $a = 30, which PHP is not meant to do (there are hacks but they are complicated and only work in certain situations (google "get variable name as string in php" to see what I mean)
If by the top value you mean the first alphabetically then the following would work:
$array1 = array('a', 'b');
$array2 = array('a', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'g');
$array3 = array('b', 'd', 'g', 'h');
$array4 = array('e', 't', 'z');
$array5 = array('b', 'c', 'd', 'k');
$mainArray = array($array1, $array2, $array3, $array4, $array5);
foreach ($mainArray as $key => $value) {
sort($mainArray[$key]);
}
$resultArray = array();
foreach($maniArray as $key1 => $value1) {
$placed = FALSE;
foreach ($value1 as $value2) {
if (!(in_array($value2, $resultArray))) {
$resultArray[] = $value2;
$placed = TRUE;
break;
}
}
if (!($placed)) {
echo "All the values in the " . ($key + 1) . "th array are already max values in other arrays";
die();
}
}
var_dump($resultArray);
I'm not sure, of i really understood your problem correctly, these are my assumptions:
You have five arrays containing numbers
These numbers can occur multiple times across the arrays
You want to find the highest possible sum of elements across your arrays
The sum uses one single value of each array
But the sum must not use the same number twice
Is that correct?
If Yes, then:
The highest possible sum across all arrays is always the sum of the largest elements. If you do not want to use the same number twice, you can just get the maximum from the first array, remove it from all the others and then sum up all the remaining maxima.
Like so:
$arrays = array();
$arrays[] = array(1, 2);
$arrays[] = array(1, 3, 4, 5, 7);
$arrays[] = array(2, 4, 7, 8);
$arrays[] = array(5, 20, 26);
$arrays[] = array(2, 3, 4, 11);
for($i=0, $n=count($arrays); $i<$n; $i++) {
if($i===0) {
$a1max = max($arrays[$i]);
$sum = $a1max;
} else {
$duplicate_pos = array_search($a1max, $arrays[$i]);
if($duplicate_pos !== FALSE) {
unset($arrays[$i][$duplicate_pos]);
}
$sum += max($arrays[$i]);
}
}
echo "sum: " . $sum . "\n";
Assuming you have grouped together all your values in one array like this,
$array = array(
array(1,2,3),
array(1,2,3,4),
array(1,2,3,4,5,6),
array(1,2,3,4,5,6),
array(1,2,3,4,5,6,7)
);
Loop through $array, and get the highest value which has not been used previously,
$max = array();
foreach($array as $value)
$max[] = max(array_diff($value, $max));
Calculate the sum of all values with array_sum(),
echo "The maximal sum is: ".array_sum($max);
Suppose I have two arrays:
$a1 = array(0, 1, 2);
$a2 = array(3, 4, 5);
I want to be able to do a merge technique that alternates the array values and not just concatenate them. I want this result:
array(0, 3, 1, 4, 2, 5);
Is there a native way to do this as performance is an issue here since I need to do this thousands of times
Please note, I know I can do it like this:
for (var $i = 0; $i < count($a1); $i++) {
newArray[] = $a1[$i];
newArray[] = $b1[$i];
}
I'm looking for a built in way if there is a faster one.
$count = count($a1);
for ($i = 0; $i < $count; $i++) {
$newArray[] = $a1[$i];
$newArray[] = $b1[$i];
}
My work here is done.
$a1 = array(0,1,2);
$a2 = array(3,4,5);
$start = microtime(TRUE);
for($t = 0; $t < 100000; $t++)
{
$newArray = array();
$count = count($a1);
for ($i = 0; $i < $count; $i++)
{
$newArray[] = $a1[$i];
$newArray[] = $a2[$i];
}
}
echo round(microtime(TRUE) - $start, 2); # 0.6
$a1 = array(0,1,2);
$a2 = array(3,4,5);
$start = microtime(TRUE);
for($t = 0; $t < 100000; $t++)
{
$newArray = array();
for ($i = 0; $i < count($a1); $i++)
{
$newArray[] = $a1[$i];
$newArray[] = $a2[$i];
}
}
echo round(microtime(TRUE) - $start, 2); # 0.85
So pre-counting array size will be ~1/4 [citation needed] (on freakin' 100.000 iterations you will gain 0.2 in total) faster. If you put count() inside loop, it will recount on every iteration. 1/4 seems to me a reasonably faster. If you are looking for compiled function, you can stop.
P.S. Benchmark is like bikini, it shows you everything, and nothing.
Since you are "zippering" two indexed arrays, you can "transpose and flatten". I expect that this will not be quite as fast as using a for() or foreach(), but on small input arrays, there will be no noticeable drag on performance. In other words, when coding style or minimal declared variables is sought, then the following technique should be considered.
Code: (Demo)
$a1 = [0, 1, 2];
$a2 = [3, 4, 5];
var_export(
array_merge(...array_map(null, $a1, $a2))
);
Output:
array (
0 => 0,
1 => 3,
2 => 1,
3 => 4,
4 => 2,
5 => 5,
)
As a funky little function-less approach, you can push the $a1 value from the foreach() value declaration and inside the loop's body, you can push the $a2 value. Feast your eyes... (Demo)
$result = [];
foreach ($a1 as $index => $result[]) {
$result[] = $a2[$index];
}
var_export($result);
// same output as earlier snippet
For anyone that is hunting for an associative-safe technique, you could make looped slice or splice calls. Be aware that splice() will mutate/consume the input arrays in the process. (Slice Demo) (Splice Demo)
$result = [];
for ($i = 0, $count = count($a1); $i < $count; ++$i) {
$result += array_slice($a1, $i, 1)
+ array_slice($a2, $i, 1);
}
or
$result = [];
while($a1 && $a2) {
$result += array_splice($a1, 0, 1)
+ array_splice($a2, 0, 1);
}
p.s. I even build this utility snippet to offer more dynamic tooling of how many elements should be inserted and how frequently from each array while merging. See Insert elements from one array (one-at-a-time) after every second element of another array (un-even zippering).