I currently have two tables in which stores the attendances of a student in a course. I have the hub_attendance table which stores the total attendances of a student and the hub_attendance_lesson where it stores the attendance of each lesson that a student has or has not attended. I'm not sure if this is correct or if I'm doing anything wrong, I'm a beginner in databases!
hub_attendance:
id
student_id
course_id
total_lessons
total_lessons_so_far
total_attended
total_absent
total_excused_absent
total_late
total_excused_late
hub_attendance_lesson:
id
lesson_id
course_id
student_id
date
attended
absent
excused_absent
late
excused_late
EDIT:
So I've gotten rid of the first table completely and this is my new single table.
Hub_Attendance:
id
lesson_id
course_id
student_id
date
attendance
As Dutchie432 said, you don't need the first table because it introduces unnecessary redundancy and you can count those statistics on the fly. Such aggregate tables can be a good solution if performance is an issue, but they should be used only as a last resort.
About the second table - you have separate fields attended, absent, excused_absent,
late and excused_late. Aren't these mutually exclusive? So only one of them can be true for one row? If so, you may be better off with one enumeration field called for example attendance, which would take different values for each of those states. In that way you could't have rows where none of the flags, or more than one flag, is set.
Here's what you need:
**Course**
id, name, etc...
**Lesson**
id, courseid, name, etc...
**Attendance**
id, studentid, lessonid, lateness, etc...
**Enrolment**
id, courseid, studentid, startdate, etc...
You need the enrolment table to know that students should be on a course even if they never turn up for lessons. The attendance table will allow you to have many students per lesson and many lessons per student. This is a many-to-many table. Any aggregation and counting can be done in SQL.
If I understand your schema correctly, Your first table can be totally eliminated. You should be able to fetch the totals using MySQL.
select count(id) as total_late from hub_attendance_lesson where late=true and student_id=TheUserId
Remove this first table, every total can be fetch using SQL :
SELECT count(id) AS absent
FROM hub_attendance_lesson
WHERE lesson_id = <your lesson id>
AND absent = <false / true>
I guess you'll be able to adapt this code for your needs.
Related
I need to summary columns together on each row, like a leaderboard. How it looks:
Name | country | track 1 | track 2 | track 3 | Total
John ENG 32 56 24
Peter POL 45 43 35
Two issues here, I could use the
update 'table' set Total = track 1 + track 2 + track 3
BUT it's not always 3 tracks, anywhere from 3 to 20.
Secound if I don't SUM it in mysql I can not sort it when I present data in HTML/php.
Or is there some other smart way to build leaderboards?
You need to redesign your table to have colums for name, country, track number and data Then instead if having a wide table with just 3 track numbers you have a tall, thin table with each row being the data for a given name, country and track.
Then you can summarise using something like
SELECT
country,
name,
sum(data) as total
FROM trackdata
GROUP BY
name,
country
ORDER BY
sum(data) desc
Take a look here where I have made a SQL fiddle showing this working the way you want it
Depending upon your expected data however you might really be better having a separate table for Country, where each country name only appears once (and also for name maybe). For example, if John is always associated with ENG then you have a repeating group and its better to remove that association from the table above which is really about scores on a track not who is in what country and put that into its own table which is then joined to the track data.
A full solution might have the following tables
**Athlete**
athlete_id
athlete_name
(other data about athletes)
**Country**
country_id
country_name
(other data about countries)
**Track**
Track_id
Track_number
(other data about tracks)
**country_athlete** (this joining table allows for the one to many of one country having many athletes
country_athlete_id
country_id
athlete_id
**Times**
country_athlete_id <--- this identifies a given combination of athlete and country
track_id <--- this identifies the track
data <--- this is where you store the actual time
It can get more complex depending on your data, eg can the same track number appear in different countries? if so then you need another joining table to join one track number to many countries.
Alternatively, even with the poor design of my SQL fiddle example, it might be good to make name,country and track a primary key so that you can only ever have one 'data' value for a given combination of name, country and track. However, this decision, and that of normalising your table into multiple joined tables would be based upon the data you expect to get.
But either way as soon as you say 'I don't know how many tracks there will be' then you should start thinking 'each track's data appears in one ROW and not one COLUMN'.
Like others mentioned, you need to redesign your database. You need an One-To-Many relationship between your Leaderboard table and a new Tracks table. This means that one User can have many Tracks, with each track being represented by a record in the Tracks table.
These two databases should be connected by a foreign key, in this case it could be a user_id field.
The total field in the leaderboard table could be updated every time a new track is inserted or updated, or you could have a query similar to the one you wanted. Here is how such a query could look like:
UPDATE leaderboard SET total = (
SELECT SUM(track) FROM tracks WHERE user_id = leaderboard.user_id
)
I recommend you read about database relationships, here is a link:
https://code.tutsplus.com/articles/sql-for-beginners-part-3-database-relationships--net-8561
I still get a lot of issues with this... I don't think that the issue is the database though, I think it's more they way I pressent the date on the web.
I'm able to get all the data etc. The only thing is my is not filling up the right way.
What I do now is like: "SELECT * FROM `times` NATURAL JOIN `players`
Then <?php foreach... ?>
<tr>
<td> <?php echo $row[playerID];?> </td>
<td> <?php echo $row[Time];?> </td>
....
The thing is it's hard to get sorting, order and SUM all in ones with this static table solution.
I searched around for leaderboards and I really don't understand how they build theres with active order etc. like. https://www.pgatour.com/leaderboard.html
How do they build leaderboards like that? With sorting and everything.
guys I've been trying to create create a school results management system.There is a STUDENT table and many COURSE tables. Each student must be linked to all Courses tables. e.g JOHN, MARY,PETER must partake in MATHEMATICS, ENGLISH, ELECTROPHYSICS, PROGRAMMING etc
My problem is how to define this relationship in mysql and at same time let these students fetch only their own results in all the courses.
I don't know if you have a requirement to have each course in a separate COURSE table but that doesn't make much sense. You should have a STUDENT table and a COURSES table. Then, you will need a STUDENT_COURSES table to show which courses a student has taken or must take. Your table structure should be something like:
STUDENT: Id, Name, Gender, etc
STUDENT_COURSES: Id, Student_Id, Course_Id, Taken, Grade
COURSES: Id, Course_Name
When a new student is created, you would need to add records to the STUDENT_COURSES table to insert the new STUDENT.Id into the Student_Id field and the Course_Id for each of the required courses. The default value for Taken would be false and the Grade would be Null or Empty String.
This is a very simplistic example and would not work in a real world solution because you would need to have Instructors, Locations, Etc. to make anything useful. But hopefully this will help you get started.
I need help with this mysql query that executes too long or does not execute at all.
(What I am trying to do is a part of more complex problem, where I want to create PHP cron script that will execute few heavy queries and calculate data from the results returned and then use those data to store it in database for further more convenient use. Most likely I will make question here about that process.)
First lets try to solve one of the problems with these heavy queries.
Here is the thing:
I have table: users_bonitet. This table has fields: id, user_id, bonitet, tstamp.
First important note: when I say user, please understand that users are actually companies, not people. So user.id is id of some company, but for some other reasons table that I am using here is called "users".
Three key fields in users_bonitet table are: user_id ( referencing user.id), bonitet ( represents the strength of user, it can have 3 values, 1 - 2 - 3, where 3 is the best ), and tstamp ( stores the time of bonitet insert. Every time when bonitet value changes for some user, new row is inserted with tstamp of that insert and of course new bonitet value.). So basically some user can have bonitet of 1 indicating that he is in bad situation, but after some time it can change to 3 indicating that he is doing great, and time of that change is stored in tstamp.
Now, I will just list other tables that we need to use in query, and then I will explain why. Tables are: user, club, club_offer and club_territories.
Some users ( companies ) are members of a club. Member of the club can have some club offers ( he is representing his products to the people and other club members ) and he is operating on some territory.
What I need to do is to get bonitet value for every club offer ( made by some user who is member of a club ) but only for specific territory with id of 1100000; Since bonitet values are changing over time for each user, that means that I need to get the latest one only. So if some user have bonitet of 1 at 21.01.2012, but later at 26.05.2012 it has changed to 2, I need to get only 2, since that is the current value.
I made an SQL Fiddle with example db schema and query that I am using right now. On this small database, query is working what I want and it is fast, but on real database it is very slow, and sometimes do not execute at all.
See it here: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!9/b0d98/2
My question is: am I using wrong query to get all this data ? I am getting right result but maybe my query is bad and that is why it executes so slow ? How can I speed it up ? I have tried by putting indexes using phpmyadmin, but it didn't help very much.
Here is my query:
SELECT users_bonitet.user_id, users_bonitet.bonitet, users_bonitet.tstamp,
club_offer.id AS offerId, club_offer.rank
FROM users_bonitet
INNER JOIN (
SELECT max( tstamp ) AS lastDate, user_id
FROM users_bonitet
GROUP BY user_id
)lastDate ON users_bonitet.tstamp = lastDate.lastDate
AND users_bonitet.user_id = lastDate.user_id
JOIN users ON users_bonitet.user_id = users.id
JOIN club ON users.id = club.user_id
JOIN club_offer ON club.id = club_offer.club_id
JOIN club_territories ON club.id = club_territories.club_id
WHERE club_territories.territory_id = 1100000
So I am selecting bonitet values for all club offers made by users that are members of a club and operate on territory with an id of 1100000. Important thing is that I am selecting club_offer.id AS offerId, because I need to use that offerId in my application code so I can do some calculations based on bonitet values returned for each offer, and insert data that was calculated to the field "club_offer.rank" for each row with the id of offerId.
Your query looks fine. I suspect your query performance may be improved if you add a compound index to help the subquery that finds the latest entry from users_botinet for each user.
The subquery is:
SELECT max( tstamp ) AS lastDate, user_id
FROM users_bonitet
GROUP BY user_id
If you add (user_id, tstamp) as an index to this table, that subquery can be satisfied with a very efficient loose index scan.
ALTER TABLE users_bonitet ADD KEY maxfinder (user_id, tstamp);
Notice that if this users_botinet table had an autoincrementing id number in it, your subquery could be refactored to use that instead of tstamp. That would eliminate the possibility of duplicates and be even more efficient, because there's a unique id for joining. Like so.
FROM users_botinet
INNER JOIN (
SELECT MAX(id) AS id
FROM users_botinet
GROUP BY user_id
) ubmax ON users_botinet.id = ubmax.id
In this case your compound index would be (user_id, id.
Pro tip: Don't add lots of indexes unless you know you need them. It's a good idea to read up on how indexes can help you. For example. http://use-the-index-luke.com/
I have a voting script which pulls out the number of votes per user.
Everything is working, except I need to now display the number of votes per user in order of number of votes. Please see my database structure:
Entries:
UserID, FirstName, LastName, EmailAddress, TelephoneNumber, Image, Status
Voting:
item, vote, nvotes
The item field contains vt_img and then the UserID, so for example: vt_img4 and both vote & nvotes display the number of votes.
Any ideas how I can relate those together and display the users in order of the most voted at the top?
Thanks
You really need to change the structure of the voting table so that you can do a normal join. I would strongly suggest adding either a pure userID column, or at the very least not making it a concat of two other columns. Based on an ID you could then easily do something like this:
select
a.userID,
a.firstName,
b.votes
from
entries a
join voting b
on a.userID=b.userID
order by
b.votes desc
The other option is to consider (if it is a one to one relationship) simply merging the data into one table which would make it even easier again.
At the moment, this really is an XY problem, you are looking for a way to join two tables that aren't meant to be joined. While there are (horrible, ghastly, terrible) ways of doing it, I think the best solution is to do a little extra work and alter your database (we can certainly help with that so you don't lose any data) and then you will be able to both do what you want right now (easily) and all those other things you will want to do in the future (that you don't know about right now) will be oh so much easier.
Edit: It seems like this is a great opportunity to use a Trigger to insert the new row for you. A MySQL trigger is an action that the database will make when a certain predefined action takes place. In this case, you want to insert a new row into a table when you insert a row into your main table. The beauty is that you can use a reference to the data in the original table to do it:
CREATE TRIGGER Entries_Trigger AFTER insert ON Entries
FOR EACH ROW BEGIN
insert into Voting values(new.UserID,0,0);
END;
This will work in the following manner - When a row is inserted into your Entries table, the database will insert the row (creating the auto_increment ID and the like) then instantly call this trigger, which will then use that newly created UserID to insert into the second table (along with some zeroes for votes and nvotes).
Your database is badly designed. It should be:
Voting:
item, user_id, vote, nvotes
Placing the item id and the user id into the same column as a concatenated string with a delimiter is just asking for trouble. This isn't scalable at all. Look up the basics on Normalization.
You could try this:
SELECT *
FROM Entries e
JOIN Voting v ON (CONCAT('vt_img', e.UserID) = v.item)
ORDER BY nvotes DESC
but please notice that this query might be quite slow due to the fact that the join field for Entries table is built at query time.
You should consider changing your database structure so that Voting contains a UserID field in order to do a direct join.
I'm figuring the Entries table is where votes are cast (you're database schema doesn't make much sense to me, seems like you could work it a little better). If the votes are actually on the Votes table and that's connected to a user, then you should have UserID field in that table too. Either way the example will help.
Lets say you add UserID to the Votes table and this is where a user's votes are stored than this would be your query
SELECT Users.id, Votes.*,
SUM(Votes.nvotes) AS user_votes
FROM Users, Votes
WHERE Users.id = Votes.UserID
GROUP BY Votes.UserID
ORDER BY user_votes
USE ORDER BY in your query --
SELECT column_name(s)
FROM table_name
ORDER BY column_name(s) ASC|DESC
I'm trying to record test/quiz scores in a database. What's the best method to do this when there might be a lot of tests and users?
These are some options I considered: should I create a new column for each quiz and row for users, or does this have its limitations? Might this be slow? Should i create a new row for each user & quiz? Should I stick to my original 'user' database and encode it in text?
Elaborating a little on the plan: JavaScript Quiz, submits score with AJAX, and a script sends it to the database. I'm new with php so i'm not sure about a good approach.
Any help would be greatly appreciated :) this is for a school science fair
I'd suggest 3 data tables in your database: students, tests, and scores.
Each student needs to have fields for an ID and whatever else (name, dob, etc) you want to record about them.
Tests should have fields for an ID and whatever else (name, date, weight, etc).
Scores should have the student ID, a test ID, and the score (any anything else).
This means you can query a student and join with the scores table to get all the student's scores. You can also join the test table these results to get labels put onto each score and calculate a grade based on scores and weight.
Alternately you can query for a test and join with the scores to get all the scores on a given test to get the class stats.
I would say create a database table, maybe one that lists all students(name, dob, student id), and then one for all tests(score, date, written by). Will only you access the db, or can your students access it too? If the latter is the case, you need to make sure the create accurate security or "views" to ensure the student can only see their own grades at a time (not everyone's).
Definitely do not create dynamic columns! (no column for each quiz). Also adding columns to user table (or generally any table) when they are not identifying the user(or generally any table item) is bad aproach...
This is pretty example of normalization, you should avoid storing any redundant rows. To do that you would create 3 tables and foreign keys to ensure scores are always referencing an existing user and quiz. E.g.:
users - id, nickname, name
quizzes - id, quizName, quizOtherData
scores - id, user_id (references users.id) , quiz_id , (ref. quizzes.id), score
And then add rows to scores table per user per quiz. Additionaly you could create UNIQUE key for columns user_id and quiz_id to disallow users to complete one quiz more times than one.
This will be fast and will not store redundant (unneeded extra) data.
To get results of quiz with id e.g. 4 and user info of people who's submitted this quiz, ordered from highest to lowest score, you would do query like:
SELECT users.*, scores.score
FROM scores RIGHT JOIN users ON(users.id=scores.user_id)
WHERE scores.quiz_id = 4
ORDER BY score DESC
Reason why I used RIGHT join here is because there might be users that didn't do this quiz, however every score always have an existing user&quiz (due to foreign keys
To get overall info of all users, quizes and scores you would do something like:
SELECT *
FROM quizzes
LEFT JOIN scores ON(quizzes.id=scores.quiz_id)
LEFT JOIN users ON(users.id=scores.user_id)
ORDER BY quizzes.id DESC, scores.score DESC, users.name ASC
BTW: If you are new to PHP (or anybody reading this), use PHP's PDO interface to communicate with your database :) AVOID functions like mysql_query, at least use mysqli_query, but for portability I would recommend stay with PDO.