I want to sort my products based on three criteria
Rating(5 star)
Comments
Weight of User favorite entry for this product
Does anyone know the better way to rank my product based on this three criteria ?
You can sort using a whole range of interesting criteria:
Most popular (i.e. those with the highest sales figure)
Most viewed (those with the highest viewcount)
Editor's favourites (ones which you manually select)
Most recent
etc.
Seems to be good practise. Maybe you can also rank by search engine reference (visitors refers from search enginge)
Related
I'm currenlty building a webshop. This shop allows users to filter products by category, and a couple optional, additional filters such as brand, color, etc.
At the moment, various properties are stored in different places, but I'd like to switch to a tag-based system. Ideally, my database should store tags with the following data:
product_id
tag_url_alias (unique)
tag_type (unique) (category, product_brand, product_color, etc.)
tag_value (not unique)
First objective
I would like to search for product_id's that are associated with anywhere between 1-5 particular tags. The tags are extracted from a SEO-friendly url. So I will be retrieving a unique strings (the tag_url_alias) for each tag, but I won't know the tag_type.
The search will be an intersection, so my search should return the product_id's that match all of the provided tags.
Second objective
Besides displaying the products that match the current filter, I would also like to display the product-count for other categories and filters which the user might supply.
For instance, my current search is for products that match the tags:
Shoe + Black + Adidas
Now, a visitor of the shop might be looking at the resulting products and wonder which black shoes other brands have to offer. So they might go to the "brand" filter, and choose any of the other listed brands. Lets say they have 2 different options (in practice, this will probably have many more), resulting in the following searches:
Shoe + Black + Nike > 103 results
Shoe + Black + K-swiss > 0 results
In this case, if they see the brand "K-swiss" listed as an available choise in their filter, their search will return 0 results.
This is obviously rather disappointing to the user... I'd much rather know that switching the "brand" from "adidas" to "k-swiss" will 0 results, and simply remove the entire option from the filter.
Same thing goes for categories, colors, etc.
In practice this would mean a single page view would not only return the filtered product list described in my primary objective, but potentially hundreds of similar yet different lists. One for each filter value that could replace another filter value, or be added to the existing filter values.
Capacity
I suspect my database will eventually contain:
between 250 and 1.000 unique tags
And it will contain:
between 10.000 and 100.000 unique products
Current Ideas
I did some Google searches and found the following article: http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2005/06/tagsystems-performance-tests.html
Judging by that article, running hundreds of queries to achieve the 2nd objective, is going to be a painfully slow route. The "toxy" example might work for my needs and it might be acceptable for my First objective, but it would be unacceptably slow for the Second objective.
I was thinking I might run individual queries that match 1 tag to it's associated product_id's, cache those queries, and then calculate intersections on the results. But, do I calculate these intersections in MySQL? or in PHP? If I use MySQL, is there a particular way I should cache these individual queries, or is supplying the right indexes all I need?
I would imagine it's also quite possible to maybe even cache the intersections between two of these tag/product_id sets. The amount of intersections would be limited by the fact that a tag_type can have only one particular value, but I'm not sure how to efficiently manage this type of caching. Again, I don't know if I should do this in MySQL or in PHP. And if I do this in MySQL, what would be the best way to store and combine this type of cached results?
Using sphinx search engine can make this magic for you. Its is VERY fast, and even can handle wordforms, what can be useful with SEO requests.
In terms of sphinx, make a document - "product", index by tags, choose proper ranker for query (ex, MATCH_ALL_WORDS) and run batch request with different tag combinations to get best results.
Dont forget to use cachers like memcahed or any other.
I did not test this yet, but it should be possible to have one query to satisfy your second objective rather than triggering several hundred queries...
The query below illustrates how this should work in general.
The idea is to combine the three different requests at once and group by the dedicated value and collect only those which have any results.
SELECT t1.product_id, count(*) FROM tagtable t1, tagtable t2, tagtable t3 WHERE
t1.product_id = t2.product_id AND
t2.product_id = t3.product_id AND
t1.tag_type='yourcategoryforShoe' AND t1.tag_value='Shoe' AND
t2.tag_type='product_color' AND t2.tag_value='Black' AND
t3.tag_type='brand'
GROUP BY t3.tag_value
HAVING count(*) > 0
I am about to build a web shop and need to come up with a solution of tracking user information, and based upon that suggest the users products they may like too and so build an individual user profile (what they like).
Information to be tracked/used for the algorithm, I thought should include:
past orders
wish list/bookmarks/favourites...
search terms entered
products viewed (and here also track and consider the "drop-off"-quote, meaning wether a user closes the site/goes back immediately or looks at more pictures/scrolls down (viewport) etc)
Products are assigned to categories as well as different attributes such as colors, tags etc. The table product has relations with color, category, etc.
product
id_product
price
timestamp_added
color
id_color
...
product_color
id_product_color
id_product
id_color
The questions are:
1) How would you structure a database to track e.g. products viewed? Should it be just like this?:
product_viewed
id_product_viewed
id_product
id_user
timestamp
2) If I want to calculate e.g. the users top 3 favourite colors based on colors of products the user bought, put on their wish list, bookmarked, viewed: can it be handled from a performance point of view to calculate which products should be recommended to this when querying the database every single time? Or do you update a user profile from time to time, storing only the already calculated favourite color at the moment based upon the tracked data and use the stored calculated data to find products that match this information?
How do big sites like facebook, amazon or pinterest do this? On pinterest you get suggestions for items you may like based on what items you clicked on before. How do they handle this?
Yes, your schema for product_viewed is OK.
As for their three favorite colors, try this untested code:
select c.name, count(*) as rank
from product_viewed pv
JOIN product_color pc on pc.id_product = pv.id_product
JOIN color c on pc.id_color = c.id_color
where pv.id_user = 1
group by c.name
order by rank desc
limit 3
Given indexes on the ids used to join the tables and a reasonable limit on the number of items viewed, this should have decent performance. Down the road, you might only look at their most recent 100 products, etc., just to keep it from growing forever. (Or, as you suggest, caching).
There's no magic to this, so it's probably similar to that those other sites are doing.
Doing it with tables like you just wrote is a good way.
Facebook and etc. is doing it that way as well.
But for more efficiency, they use so called B-Trees.
PHP / MySQL backend. I've got a database full of movies YouTube-style. Each video has a name and category. Videos and categories have a m:n relationship.
I'd like for my visitors to be able to search for videos and have them enter the search terms in one search field. I can't figure out how to return the best search results based on being category, occurrences in name.
What's the best way to go about something like this? Scoring? => Check for each search term whether it occurs in the name of the video; if so, award the video a point; check if the video is in categories that are also contained in the search query; if so, award it a point. Sort it by number points received? That sounds very expensive in terms of CPU usage.
Using Full-Text Search may help: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/fulltext-search.html#function_match
You can test several columns at once against an expression.
First, use full text search. It can be either MySql full-text search or some kind of extrenal full-text search engine. I recommend sphinx. It is very fast, simple and even can be integrated with MuSQL using SphinxSE (so search indexes look loke tables in MySQL). However you have to install and configure it.
Second, think about splitting search results by search type. Any kind of full-text search will return list of matched items sorted by relevancy. You can search by all fields and get a single list. This is bad idea because hits by name and hits by category will be mixed. To solve this you can do multiple searches - search by name first, then search by category.
As a result you'll have two matching sets and you have a lot of options how to display this. Some ideas:
merge 2 sets based on relevancy rate returned by the search engine. This looks like result of one single query but you know what each item is (name hit or category hit) so you can highlight this
do the same marge as above but assign different weights to different sets, for eaxmple relevancy = 0.7*name_relevancy+0.3*category_relevancy. This will make search results more natural
spit results into tabs/groups e.g. 'There are N titles and M categories matching your query)
Use bands when displaying results. For each page (assuming you are splitting search results using paginator) dispslay N items from the first set and M items from the second set (you can dipslya sets one by one or shuffle items). If there is no enough items in one of sets then just get more items from another set, so there is always M+N items per page
Any other way you can imagine
And you can use this method for any kind of fields - name, categroy, actor, director, etc. However the more fields you use the more search queries you have to execute
I don't think you can avoid looking at the title and category of every movie for each search. So the CPU usage for that is a given. If you are concerned about the CPU usage of the sort, it would be negligible in most cases, since you would only be sorting the items that have more than zero points.
Having said that, what you probably want is a system that is partially rule-based and partially point-based. For instance, if you have a title that is equal to the search term, it should come first, regardless of points. Architect your search such that you can easily add rules and tweak points as you see fit to yield the best results.
Edit: In the event of an exact title match, you can take advantage of a DB index and not search the whole table. Optionally, the same goes for category.
I wish all nodes of a certain type to have a rank (or at least be sortable in Views by this rank). This rank is a score based on different criteria: Voting API (5-star rating) average, Voting API number of votes, number of comments etc. Any suggestions on how to achive this?
You would have to create your own views sort handler, where you calculate the ranking score and sort the nodes by that. Start by looking at the views doc, and find some modules doing this and look at their code. Views can be a bit overwhelming at first, but just stick to it and experiment and you will find out how to do it.
This may help you
Fivestar uses percentage voting. You want to sort by the results of the vote: use the "Voting API percent vote result (average)" field, and it should do the trick.
views is the simpliest way to do this, look to the sort criteria then add the fields that you want.
we often see 'related items'. For instance in blogs we have related posts, in books we have related books, etc. My question is how do we compile those relevency? If it's just tag, I often see related items that does not have the same tag. For instance, when search for 'pink', a related item could have a 'purple' tag.
Anyone has any idea?
There are many ways to calculate similarity of two items, but for a straightforward method, take a look at the Jaccard Coefficient.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaccard_index
Which is: J(a,b) = intersection(a,b)/union(a,b)
So lets say you want to compute the coefficient of two items:
Item A, which has the tags "books, school, pencil, textbook, reading"
Item B, which has the tags "books, reading, autobiography"
intersection(A,B) = books, reading
union(A,B) = books, school, pencil, textbook, reading, autobiography
so J(a,b) = 2/6 = .333
So the most related item to A would be the item which results in the highest Jaccard Coefficient when paired with A.
Here are some of the ways:
Manually connecting them. Put up a table with the fields item_id and related_item_id, then make an interface to insert the connections. Useful to relate two items that are related but have no resemblance or do not belong to the same category/tag (or in an uncategorized entry table). Example: Bath tub and rubber ducky
Pull up some items that belong to the same category or have a similar tag. The idea is that those items must be somewhat related since they are in the same category. Example: in the page viewing LCD monitors, there are random LCD monitors (with same price range/manufacturer/resolution) in the "Related items" section.
Do a text search matching current item's name (and or description) against other items in the table. You get the idea.
To get a simple list of related items based on tags, the basic solutions goes like this:
3 tables, one with items, one with tags and one with the connection. The connection table consists of two columns, one for each id from the remaining tables. An entry in the connection table links a tag with an item by putting their respective ids in a row.
Now, to get that list of related items.
fetch all items which share at least one tag with the original item. be sure to fetch the tags along with the items, and then use a simple rating mechanism to determine, which item shares the most tags with the original one. each tag increases the relation-relevancy by one.
Depending on your tagging-habits, it might be smart to add some counter-mechanism to prevent large overarching tags from mixing up the relevancy. to achieve this, you could give greater weight to tags below a certain threshold of appliances. A threshold which has generally worked nicely for me, is total_number_of_tag_appliances/total_number_of_tags, which results in the average number of appliances. If the tags appliance-count is smaller than average, the relation-relevancy is increased double.
It can be more than a tag, for example it can be average of each work appearing in a paragraph, and then titles, etc
I would say they use ontology for that which adds more great features to the application.
it can also be based on "people who bought this book also bought"
No matter how, you will need some dort of connection between your items, and they will mostly be made by human beings
This is my implementation(GIST) of Jaccard index with PostgreSQL, and Ruby on Rails...
Here is an implementation of jaccard index between two texts based on bigrams.
https://packagist.org/packages/darkopetreski/textcategorization