In a Laravel 5.2 app, I'm trying to figure out the most elegant way to handle exceptions when those exceptions are thrown by API calls of external services. These shouldn't stop the program from continuing, because there are other parts of the app that still can be run afterwards that can be done even without the problematic API call.
E.g. currently I have
try {
$statistics->results = $api->call($parameter);
$statistics->status = Statistic::SUCCESS;
} catch (ExternalApiCallException $e) {
$statistics->results = null;
$statistics->status = Statistic::API_CALL_ERROR;
}
I was thinking of using Laravel's app/Exceptions/Handler.php and using
if ($e instanceof ExternalApiCallException $e) {
Log::warning("API Call didn't work");
}
but then I wouldn't be able to set the status of the statistics there, because Handler.php wouldn't have access to it. Is there a better way or are try-catch-blocks the way to go here?
try-catch-finally is definitely a good approach here. In your case API exceptions are localized and should not appear globally (I presume), so I would opt for keeping logic in one place and not putting exception handling as a condition in Handler.php file. In my opinion Handler.php should be used as a last resort option, to style and report otherwise uncaught and unexpected exceptions. For all other cases where exceptions are not critical or even expected, local try {} blocks are easier to maintain, as important parts of the code are not hidden from developer in another file.
Do not forget that you can also use finally {} block, which will be executed after both try{} and catch{} blocks, no matter if the exception was triggered or not.
try
{
// run this first
}
catch (ExternalApiCallException $e)
{
// in case something went wrong
}
finally
{
// this runs after everything else
}
I have a query with try-catch block. I am going to create object and if it fails it will throw error message or say redirect on some other page.
Code
function __construct() {
try{
$this->ServiceObj = AnyClass::getService('XXX');
}
catch{
return Redirect::to('/');
}
}
public function MyOwnFunction() {
$getValueofCode = $this->_ServiceObj->set($endPoint_Url); //it's only example method not want to set anything
}
Is this correct way to define and use the try catch block in a constructor? Can I use try & catch block in construction? If NO than is there a better way to achieve this?
Thanks in Advance!!!
You can definitely use try catch in a constructor, just don't forget to specify the exception class you want to catch like catch (\Exception $e). However Laravel will not process the returned redirect. (By definition constructors shouldn't even return something)
An easy fix for this would be calling send() on the redirect. This will return it immediately to the client and stop the app.
try{
$this->ServiceObj = AnyClass::getService('XXX');
}
catch(\Exception $e){
Redirect::to('/')->send();
}
But since you mentioned a login page, you might be better of using a before filter to check and redirect. Like the built in auth filter does.
A third solution would be App::error. In app/start/global.php you could do something like this:
App::error(function(FooBarException $exception)
{
return Redirect::to('/');
});
Of course this only works if your exception is specific enough (replace FooBarException with the exception you want to catch)
I am having an issue where an exception is being thrown but not caught in Module.php. The code that throws the exception is wrapped in a try/catch. There's nothing really fancy going on so I am assuming ZF2 has a quirk and/or reason for not allowing exceptions to be caught here.
The code is as follows (simplified as necessary):
class Module
{
public function onBootstrap(MvcEvent $e)
{
// Get service manager, etc.
// Set up some environment stuff
try {
// exception is thrown
}
catch (\Exception $e) {
echo $e->get_message();
exit;
}
}
}
Why is the exception not being caught?
In an ideal world there would be a way to catch this exception here. But if that is not possible, or is too convoluted to be worth the effort, an alternative process to fetching this data (regardless of source) as early in the page loading process as possible would be appreciated.
meta
I know the code in Module.php is supposed to be lightweight. But we have to fetch some data immediately before any action is performed as it will contain data vital to those actions to be performed. This data is cached after the first visit so every other page load will avoid this overhead.
I also have Googled this but apparently no one else has either experienced this, asked about it, or documented it.
This code works just fine for me in a module class:
public function onBootstrap(MvcEvent $e)
{
try {
// exception is thrown
throw new \Exception('My exception here');
}
catch (\Exception $e) {
echo $e->getMessage();
exit;
}
}
It displays the exception message and exits.
One way to investigate what is happening is to use xdebug for step by step debugging.
Just add a breakpoint in your Module and see what ZF is doing.
I'm using an external file with $errmsg array for displaying errors, like:
'app_init' => 'Cannot initialize application',
Using conditionals, I call the function to display the message on failure:
if(!$condition)
{
$arraywithmessages->functionforfiltering($err,'app_init',$aim);
}
...where $err is the array of messages, and $aim is predefined method of publishing error (e-mail, view, etc...)
Now I'd like to make use of Exception Handling, but I don't know where to start. Can anyone help? This doesn't seem to work:
try {
if (!$condition) {
throw new Exception('app_init');
}
// continue
} catch (Exception $e) {
$arraywithmessages->functionforfiltering($err,$e->getMessage(),$aim);
}
I don't know exactly what you want to achive but you should remember that try, catch should be used wisely. It should be used for Exceptional situations only. If you don't use them in that way then it's GOTO code.
About exceptions, remmeber that you can extend Exception class and make your own exceptions and catch them in multiple catch blocks, there is also finally block.
About the constructor of Exception. It has the second param which is $code you can use it to show proper message.
$err = array(0x1 => 'my error app init');
try {
if (!$condition) {
throw new Exception('app_init', 0x1);
}
// continue
} catch (Exception $e) {
echo $err[$e->getCode()]; //it shouldn't be only echo it should do some tries to fix the code close streams etc. not just echo.
}
There is also function
set_exception_handler(). which:
Sets the default exception handler if an exception is not caught within a try/catch block. Execution will stop after the exception_handler is called.
Consider using it. There are a lot of things that can be found in manual.
I've been wondering why would I use Exceptions in my PHP. Let's take a look at a simple example:
class Worker
{
public function goToWork()
{
return $isInThatMood ?
// Okay, I'll do it.
true :
// In your dreams...
false;
}
}
$worker = new Worker;
if (!$worker->goToWork())
{
if (date('l',time()) == 'Sunday')
echo "Fine, you don't have to work on Sundays...";
else
echo "Get your a** back to work!";
}
else
echo "Good.";
Is there a reason for me to use Exceptions for that kind of code? Why? How would the code be built?
And what about code that may produce errors:
class FileOutputter
{
public function outputFile($file)
{
if (!file_exists($file))
return false;
return file_get_contents($file);
}
}
Why would I use Exceptions in the above case? I have a feeling that Exceptions help you to recognize the type of the problem, which occured, true?
So, am I using Exceptions appropriately in this code:
class FileOutputter
{
public function outputFile($file)
{
if (!file_exists($file))
return throw new Exception("File not found.",123);
try
{
$contents = file_get_contents($file);
}
catch (Exception $e)
{
return $e;
}
return $contents;
}
}
Or is that poor? Now the underlying code can do this:
$fo = new FileOutputter;
try
{
$fo->outputFile("File.extension");
}
catch (Exception $e)
{
// Something happened, we could either display the error/problem directly
echo $e->getMessage();
// Or use the info to make alternative execution flows
if ($e->getCode() == 123) // The one we specified earlier
// Do something else now, create "an exception"
}
Or am I completely lost here?
When should I use an exception?
You use an exception to indicate an exceptional condition; that is, something which prevents a method from fulfilling its contract, and which shouldn't have occurred at that level.
For example, you might have a method, Record::save(), which saves changes to a record into a database. If, for some reason, this can't be done (e.g. a database error occurs, or a data constraint is broken), then you could throw an exception to indicate failure.
How do I create custom exceptions?
Exceptions are usually named such that they indicate the nature of the error, for example, DatabaseException. You can subclass Exception to create custom-named exceptions in this manner, e.g.
class DatabaseException extends Exception {}
(Of course, you could take advantage of inheritance to give this exception some additional diagnostic information, such as connection details or a database error code, for example.)
When shouldn't I use an exception?
Consider a further example; a method which checks for file existence. This should probably not throw an exception if the file doesn't exist, since the purpose of the method was to perform said check. However, a method which opens a file and performs some processing could throw an exception, since the file was expected to exist, etc.
Initially, it's not always clear when something is and isn't exceptional. Like most things, experience will teach you, over time, when you should and shouldn't throw an exception.
Why use exceptions instead of returning special error codes, etc?
The useful thing about exceptions is that they immediately leap out of the current method and head up the call stack until they're caught and handled, which means you can move error-handling logic higher up, although ideally, not too high.
By using a clear mechanism to deal with failure cases, you automatically kick off the error handling code when something bad happens, which means you can avoid dealing with all sorts of magic sentinel values which have to be checked, or worse, a global error flag to distinguish between a bunch of different possibilities.
I'm not a PHP programmer, but this looks similar to C#.
Typically you'd want to throw errors if it is a point of no return. Then you would be able to log something to show that the impossible happened.
If you can tell that the file doesn't exist then you could just say that. No real need in my mind to also throw an exception.
Now if the file was found and you are processing it, and say only half the file was uploaded and you had no way of telling that without an exception, then it'd be nice to have around.
I would say it's a good design practice to avoid the catch all exceptions "catch (Exception $e)" and design by contract instead, just like you seem to be doing in the prior example. I would at first be more specific with the type of exception being thrown and then work from there if needed. Otherwise, stay away from the try->catch and exceptions.
In no way can you assume that a file exists just because you called file_exists()! The function file_exists doesn't open the file, so the file can potentially be deleted or renamed or moved at any time!
class FileOutputter
{
public function outputFile($file)
{
if (!file_exists($file))
return false;
///<--- file may be deleted right here without you knowing it
return file_get_contents($file);//<-- then this will throw an error
//if you don't catch it, you're program may halt.
}
}
I believe this it better:
class FileOutputter
{
public function outputFile($file)
{
try{
if (!file_exists($file))
return false;
return file_get_contents($file);
}catch(Exception e){
check_what_went_wrong_and_go_to_plan_B();
}
}
}
(Edit: And it's probably even better to actually try to open the file from the beginning. If you succeed then you have a 'lock' on the file and it won't just disappear. If not, then catch the exception and see what went wrong.
Then again, you might feel that this level of reduncancy is just silly. In that case I don't think you need to worry about try/catch at all :)
Just a note really, your code for file outputter is invalid, since file_get_contents($file)
does not throw an exception. It will however raise a warning if the file doesn't exist, or can't be accessed for some reason. Additionally, you are returning an exception from outputFile, when you should probably be just letting the error propagate up the call stack.
However, you can register the error handler in php to throw exceptions when an error occurs:
function exception_error_handler($errno, $errstr, $errfile, $errline ) {
throw new ErrorException($errstr, 0, $errno, $errfile, $errline);
}
set_error_handler("exception_error_handler");
That way, any standard function calls that cause an error will throw an exception.
So, I would change FileOutputter to this (with that snippet above added):
class FileOutputter
{
public function outputFile($file)
{
if (!file_exists($file))
throw new Exception("File not found.",123);
return file_get_contents($file);
}
}
The calling code is then basically the same.
Basically rule is not to return an Exception when an error occurs - you can catch it if you want, and throw a custom exception, but let the exception go up the call stack until you want to use it.