ZF + PHPUnit: How to assert existence of html elements within ajax response? - php

Should I extend the ControllerTestCase and create a custom method to handle this? What is the best way?

AJAX response should be no different than any other response. So no subclassing should be necessary.
But if you mean "how to test that the response AJAX request generated from the file I'm testing is correct?" there is no way to do that (except Selenium tests maybe). And it's not PHP's job to test this - you should use JavaScript tests to test it.
When you're sure the AJAX is calling correct URL with correct params, you can create the AJAX request artificaly and test the response as normal request.

Related

Should a class be able to hold an instance of itself?

I am currently busy with a PSR-7 project with responses and requests.
Currently we are setting up an application in our index.php by doing something like:
$app = new Application();
$app->loadConfiguration(
'../config/global.yml',
);
// Should return the response?
$app->run((new ServerRequestFactory())->createServerRequestFromGlobals());
Here the run method also calls an emit method that is responsible for sending the headers and printing the body of the response.
The request and respons are now linked together in one call which makes it hard to test since you don't want to send the response with the headers straight to PHPUnit.
I have removed the emit call in the chain of the run method and added this to the index after the run method call:
// Send the response.
$app->send();
This way they are decoupled but the downside is I now have to hold a instance of my response in a response property inside my Application.php($app) class.
I want to move the response instance to the response class itself but my co-workers thinks a class should never hold an instance of itself. Yet when I look at frameworks this happens quite a lot. Is he right about this?
What arguments can I make to decouple my request and response besides easier testing?
I am pretty new to unit testing, one of the arguments I have already heard is that I should not test the full application anyways but rather separate components and therefore should not be worried about de-coupling the request and response.

AWS S3 SDK for PHP 2 - Get HTTP Request/Response Strings

I have a generic HTTP file access API which I use for the system I'm working on. To make it as flexible as possible, it returns request and response data in the form of HTTP strings.
I'm currently implementing a version which interacts with the S3, via the AWS SDK for PHP 2.
Is there an easy way to quickly get the Request and Response HTTP requests which the S3Client makes when performing operations? If not, is there a more piecemeal way which I can use to not have to fake it?
Basically, I'd like the full-text of both the Request and Response on demand, or at least access to relevant data (headers, response codes, URLs, etc) so I can properly populate the return data for my framework.
Thanks.
You can get either the request or response object from a command object. Assuming $s3 holds an instance of Aws\S3\S3Client, you could do something like this:
$command = $s3->getCommand('ListObjects', array('Bucket' => '<bucket-name>'));
$request = $command->getRequest();
$response = $command->getResponse();
Those objects have methods for viewing the body, headers, status codes, etc. and you can cast them to string to see the string form.
If you want to quickly see the request and response as you are executing commands, you can attach the wire logger, and see what comes out on STDOUT (or STDERR)
$s3->addSubscriber(\Guzzle\Plugin\Log\LogPlugin::getDebugPlugin());
$s3->listObjects(array('Bucket' => '<bucket-name>'));
You will need to look into the Guzzle\Http\Client class, which is an ancestor class to S3Client, to have a look at the methods that it makes available. You can always override some of these methods in your own child of S3Client to make accessing this information easier for you.
Ultimately the data you are looking for resides in an object of class Guzzle\Http\Message\Response, which I believe is returned from Guzzle\Http\Client::send().
So perhaps in your own implementation of S3Client you can override the send() method to send the HTTP requests, then process the response data as needed.

Setting headers for CakePHP Controller unit tests

I'm writing some unit tests for a Controller in which the response behavior differs slightly, depending on whether $this->request->is('ajax'). I've been looking over the documentation for testing controllers, but I can't seem to find a way to simulate a request made via AJAX.
Is there a way to send headers to testAction() so I can set the X-Requested-With header?
Edit: You can work around this by editing the superglobals. Anyone have a less hacky solution?
One solution is to manually declare the necessary environment variable for the duration of your test:
$_ENV['HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH'] = 'XMLHttpRequest';
// Run your AJAX test...
unset($_ENV['HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH']);

phpunit testing with ajax and zend framework

i have a problem with writing tests for my action that gets called by jquery via ajax. i don't know how to catch the data that is being sent back to the view, by the action, so that i could assert if it's correct. my $.ajax(...) script inserts result, echo-ed by the controller, into a textarea element, but in my test script, result is null. failure message:
Failed asserting that null matches expected '...
here's what my test code so far:
$this->getRequest()->setRawBody('some json containing input params im testing');
$this->getRequest()->setMethod('GET');
$this->getRequest->setHeader('HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH','XMLHttpRequest');
$this->dispatch('my url');
$result = json_decode($this->getResponse()->getBody(),true);
$expectedResult = 'some string';
$this->assertEquals($expectedResult, $result['targeted element']);
The recommendation I write below is how I test and has proven to be much more useful and less error prone:
No "controller" testing.
Inject models and value objects into your services.
Inject services into your controllers.
Test models, value objects, and services.
Use a JavaScript testing framework to test your JS -- There are tons of good options out there that will allow you to mock your Ajax calls.

PHP OOP and AJAX: How to handle serverside in Class?

I'm working on converting my standard PHP project to OOP but I ran into a wall about how to handle AJAX calls with PHP Classes. I'm not happy with the way I'm doing this now. I have a TillAjax.php file which I call from my TillUI.php file from a AJAX call.
In the TillAjax.php file I do this to get the information passed from the ajax call.
$till = new Till();
if(isset($_POST['data']))
$till->doStuff($_POST['data']);
I think this ruins the OOP.
I have worked with ASP.NET MVC and here its possible to call a specific action in a controller without i have to check for the post value. So I want to know if there is a smarter PHP way to solve the above problem?
The method I use for this is to have an Ajax class.
Your php file calls Ajax::Process($_GET['handle']), where 'handle' contains the name of a static class method, so perhaps 'Till::Process'. The Ajax class checks the function against a list of permitted functions (i.e. functions that you are allowing to be called via ajax), and then uses call_user_func_array to call the function (my code uses the contents of $_POST as arguments to pass to the function). The return of that function is automatically encoded as json and outputted to the client.
This means that your target php file looks like this:
<?php
//File: ajax.php
include ("Ajax.php");
Ajax::Process($_GET['handle']);
?>
Which I think is pretty simple.
Then you can have javascript that looks like this (jquery) :
$.get('ajax.php?handle=Till::Process', {}, function(result) {
//called on page response
});
So then result now contains whatever data is returned from the php method Till::Process.
Have you considered using a PHP MVC framework such as CodeIgniter, CakePHP, Kohana, etc? They will let you route requests to specific controller methods. It will be a much cleaner solution if migrating to one of these frameworks is an option for you.

Categories