Not sure if this is the right place to ask this but I have a site with a staging and beta install of expression engine. Same versions same files everything appears to be identical. The config files are the same except for the url differences however the two sites behave differently for a number of extensions/modules. One issue was that on the staging site the previous developer had a template embedding another template and using it in a loop to execute another query so something like this:
{!-- template uri /example/uri --}
start loop
{embed="template/.thistemplate" id="{id}"}
end loop
{!--end template--}
This worked perfectly fine on staging but on the beta install it did not, it actually only embedded the last id passed through for every item in the loop which resulted in the same result for the whole loop.
To get this particular issue working I rewrote the code so that it didn't embed anything but I am having lots of other issues that are similar in the fact that they work on staging and not beta and I am wondering if anyone out there knows of any places where settings could drastically alter the behavior of the site.
In four years of EE development, I've never seen an issue like this. My only guess is that your beta environment may not use a supported version of PHP or may have modules configured in a way that parses EE's PHP code differently than your staging server does. If you haven't already done so, check the beta server's settings to make sure it fits EE's requirements. It's difficult to give you any other pointers without further information. Best of luck!
Sounds to me like the 2 sites are not truly in sync.
How was the 2nd site split off from the first site?
Were both the database and the filesystem cloned at the same time?
I would consider making a new snapshot of staging and using that as your beta site.
Related
I recently started web development. The course I took was to install WAMP and start developing right away. I used an atom text editor, this -combined with wamp- proved to be a very fast way to write client-side code(HTML, CSS, Javascript).
But when I started to write serverside PHP things got a little messy. I should probably explain my site's structure here.
I keep separate PHP, CSS, javascript files for every page on the client side, for the server side a have 2 different types of PHP files:
Files that only perform a specific operation on the database(For example returning "5 more answers"). These are always called by AJAX requests.
Files that load the page for the first time. These are only used when the user opens the page for the first time, they do necessary database queries and return the page. Later requests always go to the 1st type of PHP files.
Now regarding my problem. I debugged until now by printing variables to the screen with var_dump() or echoing. But this started to become too slow as the data I work with grew. I wonder if there is a way of debugging which will let me but a breakpoint in one of my PHP files. Then, when I open it on the browser, on the localhost I created using WAMP, will let me go through the PHP file step by step.
I have been dealing with this issue for 3 days, I tried to make it work with Eclipse IDE but couldn't find a way. Also, there seems to be no tutorials or Q&A on the internet regarding the issue.
Breakpoint debugging opens a whole new world, and is the natural step after var_dump() debugging. Not only does it speed up development, but it provides much more information about your code, as you can step through each line and see what values have been set at each step, and how they evolve as your program executes its code. This means you can track the entirety of the values at different stages with one run - imagine tracking all variables at each point using var_dump()!
Although choosing an IDE is a personal decision based on personal taste, i strongly recommend you try out PhpStorm. If you can get a student licence go for it.
PhpStorm has extensive documentation & tutorials on all features in the IDE, debugging is no exception:
https://www.jetbrains.com/help/phpstorm/configuring-xdebug.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GokeXqI93x8
I don't know of a specific solution to your issue. I'm not exactly sure what you're doing but as a quick tip, I find add the following snippet to the top of the file useful as it will highly error more easily rather than browser just say nope.
error_reporting(E_ALL);
ini_set('display_errors', 'On');
Hope this help you a bit.
I tried out what's recommended in comments and answers. I first tried Netbeans. To be fair it disappointed me. Download kept getting stuck at 100%, even for different versions. When I stopped downloading and went ahead to create a php project, there was missing parts I guess. I couldn't even manage to create a php project. But that might just be me not being able to do it.
Then I followed #leuquim's answer and #Alex Howansky's comment and downloaded PHPStorm. And I got it to work in no more than 20 minutes. I downloaded it with a student's licence. For people who want to use PHPStorm with WAMP here's a Youtube tutorial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxX4vnZFbZU
One thing to note in the video is that, maker of the video chooses PHP Web Application in the Run Configurations. That has been changed to PHP Web Page.
I guess this pretty vague question could be classified as a programming one. I did consider whether it belonged in the Ask Ubuntu / WordPress Development / Linux Administration communities- but of course I don't like to spam either. Apologies up front if I made a huge mistake and caused you to have a bad day.
Take a linux server, it has a number of WordPress sites on it, and we can already guess that the dominant interpreted language is PHP when you consider the above scenario.
These are not live sites, they are simply sites copied from a production server.
I want to simulate random traffic to all of them at once to see if the server can handle the load. Perhaps a PHP script run from the command line can do this?
Just looking for ideas at this stage.
I have tried https://www.blitz.io/ - works wonderfully, however just one site at a time as far as I'm aware.
http://jmeter.apache.org/ will do the job but need way more time to configure than blitz.io
Me and my friend are in different countries have been developing a LAMP web app for several weeks. All these times we have been sharing source code over ftp. In this way php files become messy. I have heard about CVS, and have been reading about it. But I still cannot figure out how it works exactly.
How does the CVS could help me in this matter ?
I would be much appreciated for someone who point me in the right direction.
Ok here comes a very simple explanation of VCS. After using it for a while you'll laugh at the explanation but for now I guess this should help you.
What are the problems of your current ftp file sharing?
If 2 people upload the same file one of the files will get overwritten
After uploading it you'll only see who changed the file (the last time) but not where it got changed
You can't provide information about the changes (despite putting comments in the files itself)
You can't go back in time, once uploaded old files are lost
With version control you can solve these problems:
Files get either merged into one new file, or get overwritten but the old file will still be stored to roll back if needed
You can see who made which changes when
You can provide comments when you "upload" your files about what got changed (without storing these comments inside files)
You can always go back in time and restore old "uploads"/changes
You can also create small side projects by branching. This basically let's you split your project in smaller pieces and work on them separately.
So at the beginning of your work you usually get your local sources up-to-date by getting all the changes that got made. Then you do your work and afterwards you update the online version with your changes so that other developers can pull these changes and continue to work on them or integrate these changes into their current changes.
How to implement this sorcery?
You could google for "how to implement git" or "how to implement svn" but I would recommend you to use an online service as a beginner. Here is a list of services: https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitHosting
My personal preference for closed source projects with a low number of developers is https://bitbucket.org/. You get a small wiki page and bug tracking tool provided with some of the services. If you want to use bitbucket, here is the very easy to understand documentation: https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/BITBUCKET/Bitbucket+101
Important to know:
Soon you'll learn that you don't upload files as I've written multiple times but rather change lines of code. You also don't upload them you "commit" them.
While cvs could help, not many developers will recommend using it for new projects. It has largely been replaced with Subversion (svn), but even that is falling out of favour. Many projects these days use distributed version control with git or Mercurial (hg).
A good introduction to git can be found in the free online book Pro Git.
In any case, these things are all version control systems. They help to synchronize the code between developers, and also let you track
who changed code,
when it was changed,
why it was changed, and
how it was changed.
This is very important on projects with multiple developers, but there is value in using such a system even when working on your own.
First off, I'm completely new to Drupal, so I could be making a ridiculously simple mistake...
I'm using Drupal 7.9, and trying to use an HTML homepage that I've already created, that does not follow the Theme...
I've tried using the page-front.tpl.php file, but it is completely ignored. I then found that in Drupal 7 I should be using page--front.tpl.php, but that is ignored as well.
I've looked through many different tutorial and FAQs, but to no avail. Can someone possibly point out what I'm doing wrong? I've even added some test text to the page.tpl.php file, just to make sure that it's loading that one instead; which it is. Is there some setting that I'm missing that tells Drupal to use the page--front.tpl.php file?
Here's the server setup...
Windows Server 8;
IIS 7;
MySQL 5
PHP 5
I know, we should be using Linux and Apache... I'm still working on getting our Windows happy VP to let me make the switch...:)
Thanks for any help, I'm at a loss here...
--Charles
Drupal manages all pages dynamically and stores content in the database. You will be able to designate a specific page as your home page and render it differently than other pages if you wish. Drupal is extremely flexible and capable of almost anything by using the many expansion modules that are available for it. Having said that, you should also know that there is a 'learning curve' to Drupal so don't expect good results right off the bat. If this is a one-off project, you may want to look at other alternatives as well.
At my company we have a group of 8 web developers for our business web site (entirely written in PHP, but that shouldn't matter). Everyone in the group is working on different projects at the same time and whenever they're done with their task, they immediately deploy it (cause business is moving fast these days).
Currently the development happens on one shared server with all developers working on the same code base (using RCS to "lock" files away from others). When deployment is due, the changed files are copied over to a "staging" server and then a sync script uploads the files to our main webserver from where it is distributed over to the other 9 servers.
Quite happily, the web dev team asked us for help in order to improve the process (after us complaining for a while) and now our idea for setting up their dev environment is as follows:
A dev server with virtual directories, so that everybody has their own codebase,
SVN (or any other VCS) to keep track of changes
a central server for testing holding the latest checked in code
The question is now: How do we manage to deploy the changed files on to the server without accidentaly uploading bugs from other projects? My first idea was to simply export the latest revision from the repository, but that would not give full control over the files.
How do you manage such a situation? What kind of deployment scripts do you have in action?
(As a special challenge: the website has organically grown over the last 10 years, so the projects are not split up in small chunks, but files for one specific feature are spread all over the directory tree.)
Cassy - you obviously have a long way to go before you'll get your source code management entirely in order, but it sounds like you are on your way!
Having individual sandboxes will definitely help on things. Next then make sure that the website is ALWAYS just a clean checkout of a particular revision, tag or branch from subversion.
We use git, but we have a similar setup. We tag a particular version with a version number (in git we also get to add a description to the tag; good for release notes!) and then we have a script that anyone with access to "do a release" can run that takes two parameters -- which system is going to be updated (the datacenter and if we're updating the test or the production server) and then the version number (the tag).
The script uses sudo to then run the release script in a shared account. It does a checkout of the relevant version, minimizes javascript and CSS1, pushes the code to the relevant servers for the environment and then restarts what needs to be restarted. The last line of the release script connects to one of the webservers and tails the error log.
On our websites we include an html comment at the bottom of each page with the current server name and the version -- makes it easy to see "What's running right now?"
1 and a bunch of other housekeeping tasks like that...
You should consider using branching and merging for individual projects (on the same codebase), if they make huge changes to the shared codebase.
we usually have a local dev enviroment for testing (meaning, webserver locally) for testing the uncommited code (you don't want to commit non functioning code at all), but that dev enviroment could even be on a separeate server using shared folders.
however, committed code, should be deployed to a staging server for testing before putting it in production.
You can probably use Capistrano even though is more for ruby there are some articles that describe how to use it for PHP
I think Phing can be use with CVS but not with SVN (at least that what I last read)
There are also some project around that mimic Capistrano but written in PHP.
Otherwise there is also a custom made solution :
tag files you want to deploy.
checkout files using the tag in a
specific directory
symlink the directory to the current
document root (easy to rollback to
the previous version)
Naturally check out SVN for the repository, Trac to track things, and Apache Ant to deploy.
The basic process is managing in Subversion, tracking the repositroy and developers in Trac and using Ant deployment scripts to push your site out with the settings needed. Ant allows you to easily deploy a project to a specific location. (Dev/test/prod) etc.
You need to look at:
Continuous Integration
Running unit tests on check-in of code to check it is bug free
Potentially rejecting code if it contains a bug
Having nightly builds
Releasing only the last build that was bug free
You may not get to a perfect solution, especially not at first, but the more you use your chosen solution, the more comfortable everyone will get and be able to make suggestions on improving it.
We check for the stability with ant, every night. And use ant script to deploy. It is very easy to configure and use.
I gave a similar answer yesterday to another question. Basically you can work in branches and integrate before going live.
The biggest thing you will have to get your head round is that you are dealing with changes to files, rather than individual files. Once you have branches there isn't really a current version there are just versions with different changes in.