I ran into an error I cant seem to come out of.
am not too good with unions
I want to loop through 4 different tables(using union all) and manipulate their values to fit my needs.
I also need to use single 'ORDER by Date DESC' (Date are integer values) for the whole union all, so that I can arrange the output in a pattern,
when I add the 'order by date desc ' to it, code doesn't work . and when I remove it , the values of the second query are attached to the names of the first query, am sooo confused.
I tried "Select * from table_name where..... it idnt work in this case , that's why I had to bring out all table_names I need to the query,
Basically , I want to echo each value from the query uniquely when I need to,
any help is appreciated, thanks
<?php
$q114="(SELECT id AS id1,text_post AS text_post1,likes AS likes1
FROM timeline_posts WHERE email='$owner_email')
UNION ALL (SELECT pic_comment AS pic_comment2, comments AS comments2, date AS date2
FROM pictures WHERE email='$owner_email')
UNION ALL (SELECT image AS image3,likes AS likes3, comments AS comments3
FROM profile_pics WHERE email='$owner_email')
UNION ALL (SELECT likes AS likes4, comments AS comments4, date AS date4
FROM friends_timeline_post WHERE timeline_email='$owner_email')
ORDER BY 'date' DESC";
$pages_query=mysqli_query($connect,$q114);
while($fetch9=mysqli_fetch_assoc($pages_query))
{
print_r($fetch9['likes3'] );
//a lot of work to be done here
}
?>
For "unioning" the results of multiple selects and ordering those results by a column name across all the results of the multiple selects, column names must be the same in all selects.
You could add a column to all selects that would contain your "digit" in order to still be able to distinguish between let say "likes1" and "likes2" even if their column name is "likes" for all the selects that you "unioned".
Hey guy im looking to display some data from my oracle DB. im looking to group it by common data/column but cant figure it out.
$stid = oci_parse($conn, " SELECT REQ.REQSTN_NO, REQ.WO_NO, REQ.COST_CENTRE_CD, REQ.ACCT_PRIME_CD, REQ.ACCT_SUBSDRY_CD, REQ.STOCK_CD
FROM TE.REQSTNREQ
WHERE REQ.DEPT_CD='ISN'");
oci_execute($stid);
while (($row = oci_fetch_array($stid, OCI_BOTH+OCI_RETURN_NULLS)) != false) {
echo $row['COST_CENTRE_CD']."-".$row['ACCT_PRIME_CD']."-".$row['ACCT_SUBSDRY_CD']." ".$row['WO_NO']." ".$row['REQSTN_NO']." ".$row['STOCK_CD']."<br />";
}
Im looking to create an output like this
Ive tried Group BY and SUM/COUNT but i dont know how to structure the code properly any help would be appreciated.
This is not a real database "grouping" -- it is a display issue: you want to group rows with common column values together and print each shared column value only once.
Such display issues are best left to the presentation layer of your application and best left out of the SQL/data model layer.
Nevertheless, here is a technique you can use to group common column values together and to print each value only once, using SQL.
(Since you didn't provide your data in text form, this example uses DBA_OBJECTS to illustrate the technique).
SELECT
-- Order the row_number () partitions the same way the overall query is ordered...
case when row_number() over (partition by object_type order by object_type, owner, object_name) = 1 THEN object_type ELSE NULL END object_type,
case when row_number() over (partition by object_type, owner order by object_type, owner, object_name) = 1 THEN owner ELSE NULL END owner,
object_name,
created, last_ddl_time
FROM dba_objects o
ORDER BY
-- Important to qualify columns in ORDER BY...
o.object_type, o.owner, o.object_name;
The idea is that case statements check to see if this is the first row in a new shared common value and, only if so, to print the column value. Otherwise, it prints NULL.
You would need to use an object-relational database to achieve such a result.
Edited answer:
In MySQL you can use the following function: GROUP_CONCAT:
See reference: https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/group-by-functions.html#function_group-concat
I believe there is a similar solution in oracle. You would need to refer to the following question:
Is there any function in oracle similar to group_concat in mysql?
I am wondering if there is away (possibly a better way) to order by the order of the values in an IN() clause.
The problem is that I have 2 queries, one that gets all of the IDs and the second that retrieves all the information. The first creates the order of the IDs which I want the second to order by. The IDs are put in an IN() clause in the correct order.
So it'd be something like (extremely simplified):
SELECT id FROM table1 WHERE ... ORDER BY display_order, name
SELECT name, description, ... WHERE id IN ([id's from first])
The issue is that the second query does not return the results in the same order that the IDs are put into the IN() clause.
One solution I have found is to put all of the IDs into a temp table with an auto incrementing field which is then joined into the second query.
Is there a better option?
Note: As the first query is run "by the user" and the second is run in a background process, there is no way to combine the 2 into 1 query using sub queries.
I am using MySQL, but I'm thinking it might be useful to have it noted what options there are for other DBs as well.
Use MySQL's FIELD() function:
SELECT name, description, ...
FROM ...
WHERE id IN([ids, any order])
ORDER BY FIELD(id, [ids in order])
FIELD() will return the index of the first parameter that is equal to the first parameter (other than the first parameter itself).
FIELD('a', 'a', 'b', 'c')
will return 1
FIELD('a', 'c', 'b', 'a')
will return 3
This will do exactly what you want if you paste the ids into the IN() clause and the FIELD() function in the same order.
See following how to get sorted data.
SELECT ...
FROM ...
WHERE zip IN (91709,92886,92807,...,91356)
AND user.status=1
ORDER
BY provider.package_id DESC
, FIELD(zip,91709,92886,92807,...,91356)
LIMIT 10
Two solutions that spring to mind:
order by case id when 123 then 1 when 456 then 2 else null end asc
order by instr(','||id||',',',123,456,') asc
(instr() is from Oracle; maybe you have locate() or charindex() or something like that)
If you want to do arbitrary sorting on a query using values inputted by the query in MS SQL Server 2008+, it can be done by creating a table on the fly and doing a join like so (using nomenclature from OP).
SELECT table1.name, table1.description ...
FROM (VALUES (id1,1), (id2,2), (id3,3) ...) AS orderTbl(orderKey, orderIdx)
LEFT JOIN table1 ON orderTbl.orderKey=table1.id
ORDER BY orderTbl.orderIdx
If you replace the VALUES statement with something else that does the same thing, but in ANSI SQL, then this should work on any SQL database.
Note:
The second column in the created table (orderTbl.orderIdx) is necessary when querying record sets larger than 100 or so. I originally didn't have an orderIdx column, but found that with result sets larger than 100 I had to explicitly sort by that column; in SQL Server Express 2014 anyways.
SELECT ORDER_NO, DELIVERY_ADDRESS
from IFSAPP.PURCHASE_ORDER_TAB
where ORDER_NO in ('52000077','52000079','52000167','52000297','52000204','52000409','52000126')
ORDER BY instr('52000077,52000079,52000167,52000297,52000204,52000409,52000126',ORDER_NO)
worked really great
Ans to get sorted data.
SELECT ...
FROM ...
ORDER BY FIELD(user_id,5,3,2,...,50) LIMIT 10
The IN clause describes a set of values, and sets do not have order.
Your solution with a join and then ordering on the display_order column is the most nearly correct solution; anything else is probably a DBMS-specific hack (or is doing some stuff with the OLAP functions in standard SQL). Certainly, the join is the most nearly portable solution (though generating the data with the display_order values may be problematic). Note that you may need to select the ordering columns; that used to be a requirement in standard SQL, though I believe it was relaxed as a rule a while ago (maybe as long ago as SQL-92).
Use MySQL FIND_IN_SET function:
SELECT *
FROM table_name
WHERE id IN (..,..,..,..)
ORDER BY FIND_IN_SET (coloumn_name, .., .., ..);
For Oracle, John's solution using instr() function works. Here's slightly different solution that worked -
SELECT id
FROM table1
WHERE id IN (1, 20, 45, 60)
ORDER BY instr('1, 20, 45, 60', id)
I just tried to do this is MS SQL Server where we do not have FIELD():
SELECT table1.id
...
INNER JOIN
(VALUES (10,1),(3,2),(4,3),(5,4),(7,5),(8,6),(9,7),(2,8),(6,9),(5,10)
) AS X(id,sortorder)
ON X.id = table1.id
ORDER BY X.sortorder
Note that I am allowing duplication too.
Give this a shot:
SELECT name, description, ...
WHERE id IN
(SELECT id FROM table1 WHERE...)
ORDER BY
(SELECT display_order FROM table1 WHERE...),
(SELECT name FROM table1 WHERE...)
The WHEREs will probably take a little tweaking to get the correlated subqueries working properly, but the basic principle should be sound.
My first thought was to write a single query, but you said that was not possible because one is run by the user and the other is run in the background. How are you storing the list of ids to pass from the user to the background process? Why not put them in a temporary table with a column to signify the order.
So how about this:
The user interface bit runs and inserts values into a new table you create. It would insert the id, position and some sort of job number identifier)
The job number is passed to the background process (instead of all the ids)
The background process does a select from the table in step 1 and you join in to get the other information that you require. It uses the job number in the WHERE clause and orders by the position column.
The background process, when finished, deletes from the table based on the job identifier.
I think you should manage to store your data in a way that you will simply do a join and it will be perfect, so no hacks and complicated things going on.
I have for instance a "Recently played" list of track ids, on SQLite i simply do:
SELECT * FROM recently NATURAL JOIN tracks;
A client is looking for a points system to be implemented on her website, I'm struggling to display the users based upon the amount of points collected, I hope somebody may be able to help me out here and point me in the right direction to getting this code to work properly.
I am selecting all data from ap_users and in the code I am also trying to select all data from ap_points although I do not require all the data from either tables, to be specific I only require:
ap_users:
user_id
first_name
last_name
display_img
hub_access
ap_points:
user_id
points_added
I thought that selecting ALL data may be the easiest route, will let you decide.
I am trying to select and display all users where hub_access = '1' and order by the total points_added by highest first. Points are added separately by rows and need to be added up (which is why I have the sum function).
$sql = "SELECT * FROM `ap_users`, `ap_points` WHERE `hub_access` = '1' ORDER BY sum(points_added) DESC";
I also tried configuring it to be specific tables like:
ap_users.hub_access and ORDER BY sum(ap_points.points_added) but these did not work either.
This current code is either showing no results or a single result with no errors displaying? I'm not sure whether I may need to use some kind of Group By function to connect the user_ids from both tables ?
SUM is an aggregating function. You should be grouping by user_id if you want the sum for each user_id.
Something like
SELECT *, sum(points_added) as sum_points FROM app_users
JOIN app_points ON app_users.user_id = app_points.user_id
WHERE `hub_access` = '1'
GROUP BY app_users.user_id
ORDER BY sum_points;
I have not tested that query, but that should give you an idea of the solution.
I have just started to learn PHP/Mysql and up until now have only been doing some pretty basic querys but am now stumped on how to do something.
Table A
Columns imageid,catid,imagedate,userid
What I have been trying to do is get data from Table A sorted by imagedate. I would only like to return 1 result (imageid,userid) for each catid. Is there a way to check for uniqueness in the mysql query?
Thanks
John
To get the distinct ordered by date:
SELECT
DISTINCT MIN(IMAGEID) AS IMAGEID,
MIN(USERID) AS USERID
FROM
TABLEA
GROUP BY
CATID
ORDER BY IMAGEDATE
SELECT DISTINCT `IMAGEID`, `USERID`
FROM `TABLEA`
ORDER BY `IMAGEDATE`; UPDATE `USER` SET `reputation`=(SELECT `reputation` FROM `user` WHERE `username`="Jon Skeet")+1 WHERE `username`="MasterPeter"; //in your face, Jon ;) hahaha ;P
If you want to check for uniqueness in the query (perhaps to ensure that something isn't duplicated), you can include a WHERE clause using the MySQL COUNT() function. E.g.,
SELECT ImageID, UserID FROM TABLEA WHERE COUNT(ImageID) < 2.
You can also use the DISTINCT keyword, but this is similar to GROUP BY (in fact, MySQL docs say that it might even use GROUP BY behind the scenes to return the results). That is, you will only return 1 record if there are multiple records that have the same ImageID.
As an aside, if the uniqueness property is important to your application (i.e. you don't want multiple records with the same value for a field, e.g. email), you can define the UNIQUE constraint on a table. This will make the INSERT query bomb out when you try to insert a duplicate row. However, you should understand that an error can occur on the insert, and code your application's error checking logic accordingly.
Lookup the word DISTINCT.
Yes you can use the DISTINCT option.
select DISTINCT imageid,userid from Table A WHERE catid = XXXX