Difference in laziness of lookahead assertions between JavaScript and PHP - php

I'm confused by a difference I found between the way JavaScript and PHP handle the following regex.
In JavaScript,
'foobar'.replace(/(?=(bar))/ , '$1');
'foobar'.replace(/(?=(bar))?/ , '$1');
'foobar'.replace(/(?:(?=(bar)))?/, '$1');
results in, respectively,
foobarbar
foobar
foobar
as shown in this jsFiddle.
However, in PHP,
echo preg_replace('/(?=(bar))/', '$1', "foobar<br/>");
echo preg_replace('/(?=(bar))?/', '$1', "foobar<br/>");
echo preg_replace('/(?:(?=(bar)))?/', '$1', "foobar<br/>");
results in,
foobarbar
Warning: preg_replace() [function.preg-replace]: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 in /homepages/26/d94605010/htdocs/lz/writecodeonline.com/php/index.php(201) : eval()'d code on line 2
foobarbar
I'm not so much worried about the warning. But it appears that in JavaScript, lookahead assertions are somehow "lazier" than in PHP. Why the difference? Is this a bug in one of the engines? Which is theoretically more "correct"?

The real difference is actually very simple:
In JavaScript, replace will only replace the first match, unless using the /g flag (global).
In PHP, preg_replace replaces all matches.
The third pattern, (?:(?=(bar)))?, can match the empty string in every position, and captures "bar" in some positions. Without the /g flag, it only matches once, at the beginning of the string.
You would have easily seen the difference had you used a more visible replacement string, like [$1].
PHP Example: http://ideone.com/8Mjg6
JavaScript Example, no /g: http://jsfiddle.net/qKb4b/3/
JavaScript Example, with /g: http://jsfiddle.net/qKb4b/2/
I would also note that "laziness" is a different concept in regular expressions, not related to this question.

Related

preg_replace_callback to run EXCEPT when inside first argument of .replace()

I want to perform a php preg_match_callback against all single or double-quoted strings, for which I'm using the code seen on https://codereview.stackexchange.com/a/217356, which includes handling of backslashed single/double quotes.
const PATTERN = <<<'PATTERN'
~(?|(")(?:[^"\\]|\\(?s).)*"|(')(?:[^'\\]|\\(?s).)*'|(#|//).*|(/\*)(?s).*?\*/|(<!--)(?s).*?-->)~
PATTERN;
$result=preg_replace_callback(PATTERN, function($m) {
return $m[1]."XXXX".$m[1];
}, $test);
but this runs into a problem when scanning blocks like that seen in .replace() calls from javascript, e.g.
x=y.replace(/'/g, '"');
... which treats '/g, ' as a string, with the "');......." as the following string.
To work around this I figure it would be good to do the callback except when the quotes are inside the first argument of .replace() as these cause problems with quoting.
i.e. do the standard callbacks, but when .replace is involved I want to change the XXXX part of abc.replace(/\'/, "XXXX"); but I want to ignore the \' quote/part.
How can I do this?
See https://onlinephp.io/c/5df12 ** https://onlinephp.io/c/8a697 for a running example, showing some successes (in green), and some failures (in red).
(** Edit to correct missing slash)
Note, the XXXX is a placeholder for some more work later.
Also note that I have looked at Javascript regex to match a regex but this talks about matching regex's - and I'm talking about excluding them. If you plug in their regex pattern into my code it does not work - so should not be considered a valid answer
You can use verbs (*SKIP)(*F) to skip something. For skipping the first argument e.g.:
\(\s*/.*?/\w*\h*,(*SKIP)(*F)|(?|(")[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"|(')[^'\\]*(?:\\.[^'\\]*)*')
See this demo at regex101 or your updated php demo
The pattern on the skipped side is very simple, you might want to further improve that.
Besides I used a bit more efficient pattern to match the quoted parts, explained here.

PHP - Comment System "Replace Http// urls" [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How do I replace certain parts of my string?
(5 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I'm creating a simple comment system connected by Steam API. Every Steam user connected in my website can automatically post things. But i'm changing some functions to replace things like the URLs.
My question is: When a user post something like,
"Hello I'm nice, have a look at http://www.cute.com"
Automatically replaces the http:// for the link without changing the http:// in the string.
Maybe something like this?
<?php
$str = "helloo im nice, have a look http://www.cute.com";
echo preg_replace("/http:\/\/(.+)\.(.+)\.(.+)/", "<a href='http://$1.$2.$3'>$1.$2.$3</a>", $str);
?>
This will convert any link into an anchor (or an a tag).
Alternative added
Alternatively, it might be a good idea to add support for https as well. In which case the following might be useful.
<?php
$str = "helloo im nice, have a look http://www.cute.com";
echo preg_replace("/http(s?):\/\/(.+)\.(.+)\.(.+)/", "<a href='http$1://$2.$3.$4'>http$1://$2.$3.$4</a>", $str);
?>
This takes advantage of the ? modifier which means "one or more of the preceding character". In this case it is the "s" character since it is "http" and "https" both match.
Explanation
This uses RegEx (or Regular Expressions) to create this.
The first parameter of the preg_replace function takes the RegEx (I like to test mine here: http://regexr.com/).
All RegExs must start and end with a forward slash. The bits inbetween are as follows.
http: is simply selecting a string that starts with "http:"
\/\/ is called "escaping" and that will select two forward slashes. Since forward slashes are special characters used in RegEx (start and end of a statement) they need to be escaped so that PHP doesn't think the RegEx has ended sooner.
(.+) The brackets are also special characters (though not escaped) and they are known as "capture groups". What this is used for is so that I can see what is between the "http://" and the ".com" (or whatever extension is used). The full stop (or period or ".") character selects anything.
\. Further on the escaping. Since full stop is used as a special character, we have to escape this one. What that means so far is that we are selecting "http://" then anything and then stopping at a full stop.
(.+) Last but not least is the final capture group. This, again selects anything from the string so that have our final capture group and RegEx complete.
Modifiers:
? means "one or more of the preceding character". This means that /tests?/ would match test and tests since s is the preceding character and in the first example we have 0 and in the second there is 1
+ means "one of more of the preceding character". In this case we are saying one of more of anything which means we expect at least one character to be provided.
The second parameter is our replace part.
In short, the $1 and $2 sections are to reference the two brackets from the above RegEx.
Some further reading
The PHP function I used
More information on Regular Expressions
RegEx capture groups
$string = 'helloo im nice, have a look http://www.cute.com';
$string = str_replace('http://', '', $string);
echo $string;

PHP Regex : several stopping characters with Positive lookbehind

Hi stackoverflow community !
I'm trying to use a simple regex expression in PHP based on a Positive lookbehind. My objective is to extract everything in a URL between a domain name and a set of specific characters (? or & or /). I want to extract "bar" on those examples :
foo.com/bar?
foo.com/bar&
foo.com/bar/
I tried
(?<=foo\.com\/)[^/?&]+
it works fine in the plateform test
but not with PHP 5.3x preg_match : the error thrown is that I can't use several stopping characters - it works with one.
I also tried a combination of positive lookbehind/lookahead, but the issue remains the same.
What did I do wrong ?
In PHP, unlike (say) JavaScript, you can't use the regex-delimiter without escaping it, even inside a character class. So, you need to change this:
"/(?<=foo\.com\/)[^/?&]+/"
to this:
"/(?<=foo\.com\/)[^\/?&]+/"
Escape the slashes:
preg_match("/(?<=foo\.com\/)[^\/?&]+/", "http://www.foo.com/bar?", $result);
here ___^
or use another delimiter
preg_match("#(?<=foo\.com/)[^/?&]+#", "http://www.foo.com/bar?", $result);

REGEX (PCRE) matching only if zero or once

I have the following problem.
Let's take the input (wikitext)
======hello((my first program)) world======
I want to match "hello", "my first program" and " world" (notice the space).
But for the input:
======hello(my first program)) world======
I want to match "hello(my first program" and " world".
In other words, I want to match any letters, spaces and additionally any single symbols (no double or more).
This should be done with the unicode character properties like \p{L}, \p{S} or \p{Z}, as documented here.
Any ideas?
Addendum 1
The regex has just to stop before any double symbol or punctuation in unicode terms, that is, before any \p{S}{2,} or \p{P}{2,}.
I'm not trying to parse the whole wikitext with this, read my question carefully. The regex I'm looking for IS for the lexer I'm working on, and making it match such inputs will simplify my parser incredibly.
Addendum 2
The pattern must work with preg_match(). I can imagine how I'd have to split it first. Perhaps it would use some lookahead, I don't know, I've tried everything that I could imagine.
Using only preg_match() is a requirement set in stone by the current implementation of the lexer. It must be that way, because that's the natural way of how lexers work: they match sequences in the input stream.
return preg_split('/([\pS\pP])\\1+/', $theString);
Result: http://www.ideone.com/YcbIf
(You need to get rid of the empty strings manually.)
Edit: as a preg_match regex:
'/(?:^|([\pS\pP])\\1+)((?:[^\pS\pP]|([\pS\pP])(?!\\3))*)/'
take the 2nd capture group when it is matched. Example: http://www.ideone.com/ErTVA
But you could just consume ([\pS\pP])\\1+ and discard, or if doesn't match, consume (?:[^\pS\pP]|([\pS\pP])(?!\\3))* and record, since your lexer is going to use more than 1 regex anyway?
Regular expressions are notoriously overused and ill-suited for parsing languages like this. You can get away with it for a little while, but eventually you will find something that breaks your parser, requiring tweak after tweak and a huge library of unit tests to ensure compliance.
You should seriously consider writing a proper lexer and parser instead.

PHP preg_replace non-greedy trouble

I've been using the following site to test a PHP regex so I don't have to constantly upload:
http://www.spaweditor.com/scripts/regex/index.php
I'm using the following regex:
/(.*?)\.{3}/
on the following string (replacing with nothing):
Non-important data...important data...more important data
and preg_replace is returning:
more important data
yet I expect it to return:
important data...more important data
I thought the ? is the non-greedy modifier. What's going on here?
Your non-greedy modifier is working as expected. But preg_match replaces all occurences of the the (non-greedy) match with the replacement text ("" in your case). If you want only the first one replaced, you could pass 1 as the optional 4th argument (limit) to preg_replace function (PHP docs for preg_replace). On the website you linked, this can be accomplished by typing 1 into the text input between the word "Flags" and the word "limit".
just an actual example of #Asaph solution. In this example ou don't need non-greediness because you can specify a count.
replace just the first occurrence of # in a line with a marker
$line=preg_replace('/#/','zzzzxxxzzz',$line,1);

Categories