CakePHP - Find parent based on child - php

I have three tables companies, products and prices.
Companies hasMany Products
Products hasMany Prices
I'm currently trying to search these tables for products that are less than a certain price, the code I'm trying is:
$results = $this->Product->find('all', array(
'conditions' => array(
'Price.price <=' 10
)
));
For some reason using this code cakephp this brings back an error:
Unknown column 'Price.price' in 'where clause'
I think this is because products have multiple prices (it's joining with the companies table not the prices table), can anyone tell me why this is going wrong and know how to get it working?
Note: After getting this working, I want to be able to find products based on criteria from the prices and products tables, then display data from all 3 in a results page.
I thought about first searching the prices table and then searching the products table, but I believe there must be a more efficient way?

You may use adhoc-joins for these types of queries. Cake doesn't do joins for 1:n or n:n relationships, so you have to specify it manually.
$results = $this->Product->find('all', array(
'joins' => array(
array(
'alias' => 'Price',
'table' => 'prices',
'foreignKey' => false,
'conditions' => array('Price.product_id = Product.id'),
),
),
'conditions' => array(
'Price.price <=' => 10,
),
));

In your place I would do this:
$results = $this->Product->Price->find('all', array(
'recursive' => 2,
'conditions' => array(
'Price.price <=' => 10
)
));
HasMany does not joins table but belongsTo does.

Related

Cakephp count containable records

Cakephp 2.6
Schools hasMany Pupils and I am running a containable query from the Schools model. In this query I want to count the number of pupils each school has but I can't get it to work.
I've tried using the following virtual field, but it doesn't work
$this->virtualFields['total'] = 'COUNT(Pupil.id)';
and the following is giving inaccurate counts
$contain = array(
'Pupil' => array(
'fields' => array(
'CONT(Pupil.id) AS total'
)
),
);
I don't want to use counterCache as data can be mass imported to both tables outside of the framework so I can't rely on it to update the count field.
How can I get this count to run correctly?
Try to add grouping by Schools:
$contain = array(
'Pupil' => array(
'fields' => array(
'CONT(Pupil.id) AS total'
),
'group' => array('Pupil.school_id') // doesn't really know how you called `school` relation column...
),
);

CakePHP ignores condition

I have the following problem with CakePHP:
Two tables are joined (filters and accounts). Then I am building conditions and only the second condition Account.active =>1 gets executed. If I print the result, there are still showing filters that are having another mode_id than 3.
$joins= array(
array('table' => 'filters',
'alias' => 'Filter',
'type' => 'right',
'conditions' => array(
'Filter.account_id = Account.id',
)
),
);
Then I execute the request including joins and conditions
$activeAccounts = $this->Account->find('all',array(
'conditions'=>array('AND'=>array('Filter.mode_id'=>3,'Account.active'=>1)),
'joins'=>$joins));
The models were checked and no problems identified. Filter belongs to Account. Account has many Filter.
Below the query that is generated. The results are still showing filters with Filter.mode_id other than 3
Here is the query that is generated. The results are still containing rows with Filter.mode_id other than 3 despite the fact that one condition is 'Filter.mode_id'=>3
SELECT `Account`.`id`, `Account`.`user_id`, `Account`.`name`,
`Account`.`api_key`, `Account`.`account_number`, `Account`.`remaining_balance`,
`Account`.`investment_size`, `Account`.`active`
FROM `baseline_db`.`accounts` AS `Account`
right JOIN `baseline_db`.`filters` AS `Filter`
ON (`Filter`.`account_id` = `Account`.`id`)
WHERE ((`Filter`.`mode_id` = 3) AND
(`Account`.`active` = '1'))
Like say Oldskool, use the Model associations
and for your condition, The "AND" is not necessary,
you cant put :
$activeAccounts = $this->Account->find('all',array(
'conditions' => array(
'Filter.mode_id'=>3,
'Account.active'=>1
)
));
the request you want to make with the type of relation you have, seem to me weird.
If i understand, perhaps with something like that :
$this->loadModel('Filter');
$filters =$this->Filter->find("list", array(
'conditions' => array('Filter.mode_id' => 3),
'fields' => array('Filter.account_id')
));
$activeAccounts = $this->Account->find('all',array(
'conditions' => array(
'Account.account_id'=>$filters,
'Account.active'=>1
)
));

Complex ordering in CakePHP using Containable

I`m having a problem with the Containable behaviour.
I would like to know if there is any way to access the contained model attributes for operations like ordering.
For example, I have a model B which belongs to a Model A. I need to order objects of B using an attribute (integer) of A. It would be something like:
'contain' => array(
'A' => array(
'B' => array(
'order' => 'A.integer_attribute'
)
)
)
I know that there are easier ways to do this without Containable, but for reasons which are not worth being detailed here, I need to use it. This is an abstract example, in truth model A belongs to other models and this is just a small part of a deep containable tree.
I'd be very glad with any help!
EDIT
OK, I'll try my best to describe the situation without being unclear:
I have 4 models: User, Category, Field and UserField, and their relationships are as follows:
Category hasMany User
Category hasMany Field
User hasMany UserField
Field hasMany UserField
The opposite of these relations are all belongsTo. The purpose here is that the user belongs to a category, which has many fields that he needs to fill with his information (city, state etc). The information he fills is stored in the UserField table, as each information needs to have its field and the user who provided it.
That said, I need to build a screen which displays, for each category, a list of users and their information. So, I retrieve all the categories and its fields, so I can build a table for each category. Each field has an attribute "no_order", which is the number that indicates the order in which the field appears.
At the same time, I need all of each category's users to display them correctly in the tables. Finally, and there's the problem, I need to have UserField objects ordered by the "no_order" of their respective fields, for each user. So I ended up with something like:
$categories = $this->Category->find('all', array(
'order' => 'Category.name',
'contain' => array(
'Field',
'User' => array(
'UserField' => array(
'order' => 'Field.no_order'
)
)
)
));
But this doesn't work, since UserField cannot reach its respective Field's no_order from there.
I apologize if this wasn't clear enough, but for anyone who would spend a little while reading this, I would be VERY grateful for your help!
I am not shure for what do you want so, but I thing that should use joins of cakephp
$A = $this->A->find('all', array(
'joins' => array(
array(
'table' => 'B',
'alias' => 'B',
'type' => 'LEFT',
'conditions' => array(
'B.field_id = A.id'
)
)
),
'conditions' => array(
'B.field' => 'if_you_want_more_conditions'
),
'contain' => array(
'A' => array(
'B' => array(
'order' => 'A.integer_attribute'
)
)
),
'fields' => array('A.field','B.field'),
'recursive' => -1
));
I finally came up with a solution. I don't know how efficient it is, but there it goes:
'contain' => array(
'Field',
'User' => array(
'User.privilege = "Solicitante"'
'UserField' => array(
'order' => '(SELECT f.no_order FROM fields AS f WHERE UserField.field_id = f.id LIMIT 1)'
)
)
)
Having the raw query solved my problem. Hope it helps anybody who comes across a similar problem!

CakeDC search plugin using complex conditions in query with HABTM

I wrote 2 days ago to ask about andConditions and it appeared that I didn't understand the idea but the fact is that for two days now I am stuck with the next step using CakeDC:
How do I implement complex HABTM conditions in "query" methods for CakeDC search plugin?
I have Offer HABTM Feature (tables: offers, features, features_offers) and the below works just fine when used in controller:
debug($this->Offer->find('all', array('contain' => array(
'Feature' => array(
'conditions' => array(
'Feature.id in (8, 10)',
)
)
)
)
)
);
The problem comes when I want to use the same conditions in the search:
public $filterArgs = array(
array('name' => 'feature_id', 'type' => 'query', 'method' => 'findByFeatures'),
);
........
public function findByFeatures($data = array()) {
$conditions = '';
$featureID = $data['feature_id'];
if (isset($data['feature_id'])) {
$conditions = array('contain' => array(
'Feature' => array(
'conditions' => array(
'Feature.id' => $data['feature_id'],
)
)
)
);
}
return $conditions;
}
I get an error:
Error: SQLSTATE[42S22]: Column not found: 1054 Unknown column
'contain' in 'where clause'
which makes me think that I cannot perform this search and/or use containable behavior in searches at all.
Can someone with more experience in the field please let me know if I am missing something or point me to where exactly to find a solution for that - perhaps a section in the cookbook?
EDIT: Also tried the joins. This works perfectly fine in the controller, returning all the data I need:
$options['joins'] = array(
array('table' => 'features_offers',
'alias' => 'FeaturesOffers',
'type' => 'inner',
'conditions' => array(
'Offer.id = FeaturesOffers.offer_id'
),
array('table' => 'features',
'alias' => 'F',
'type' => 'inner',
'conditions' => array(
'F.id = FeaturesOffers.feature_id'
),
)
),
);
$options['conditions'] = array(
'feature_id in (13)' //. $data['feature_id']
);
debug($this->Offer->find('all', $options));
... and when I try to put in the search method I get the returned conditions only in the where clause of the SQL
WHERE ((joins = (Array)) AND (conditions = ('feature_id in Array')))
...resulting in error:
SQLSTATE[42S22]: Column not found: 1054 Unknown column 'joins' in 'where clause'
EDIT: Maybe I am stupid and sorry to say that but the documentation of the plugin sucks a ton.
I double, triple and quadruple checked (btw, have lost already 30 hours at least on 1 filed of the search form facepalm) and the stupid findByTags from the documentation still doesn't make any sense to me.
public function findByTags($data = array()) {
$this->Tagged->Behaviors->attach('Containable', array('autoFields' => false));
$this->Tagged->Behaviors->attach('Search.Searchable');
$query = $this->Tagged->getQuery('all', array(
'conditions' => array('Tag.name' => $data['tags']),
'fields' => array('foreign_key'),
'contain' => array('Tag')
));
return $query;
}
As I understand it
$this->Tagged
is supposed to be the name of the model of the HABTM association.
This is quite far from the standards of cakePHP though: http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/models/associations-linking-models-together.html#hasandbelongstomany-habtm
The way it is described here, says that you don't need another model but rather you associate Recipe with Ingredient as shown below:
class Recipe extends AppModel {
public $hasAndBelongsToMany = array(
'Ingredient' =>
array(
'className' => 'Ingredient',
'joinTable' => 'ingredients_recipes',
'foreignKey' => 'recipe_id',
'associationForeignKey' => 'ingredient_id',
'unique' => true,
'conditions' => '',
'fields' => '',
'order' => '',
'limit' => '',
'offset' => '',
'finderQuery' => '',
'deleteQuery' => '',
'insertQuery' => ''
)
);
}
meaning that you can access the HABTM assoc table data from Recipe without needing to define model "IngredientRecipe".
And according to cakeDC documentation the model you need is IngredientRecipe and that is not indicated as something obligatory in the cakePHP documentation. Even if this model is created the HABTM assoc doesn't work properly with it - I tried this as well.
And now I need to re-write the search functionality in my way, using only cakePHP even though I spent already 30 hours on it... so unhappy. :(
Every time I come to do this in a project I always spend hours figuring out how to do it using CakeDC search behavior so I wrote this to try and remind myself with simple language what I need to do. I've also noticed that although Using the CakeDC search plugin with associated models this is generally correct there is no explanation which makes it more difficult to modify it to one's own project.
When you have a "has and belongs to many" relationship and you are wanting to search the joining table i.e. the table that has the two fields in it that joins the tables on either side of it together in a many-to-many relationship you want to create a subquery with a list of IDs from one of the tables in the relationship. The IDs from the table on the other side of the relationship are going to be checked to see if they are in that record and if they are then the record in the main table is going to be selected.
In this following example
SELECT Handover.id, Handover.title, Handover.description
FROM handovers AS Handover
WHERE Handover.id in
(SELECT ArosHandover.handover_id
FROM aros_handovers AS ArosHandover
WHERE ArosHandover.aro_id IN (3) AND ArosHandover.deleted != '1')
LIMIT 20
all the records from ArosHandover will be selected if they have an aro_id of 3 then the Handover.id is used to decide which Handover records to select.
On to how to do this with the CakeDC search behaviour.
Firstly, place the field into the search form:
echo $this->Form->create('Handover', array('class' => 'form-horizontal'));?>
echo $this->Form->input('aro_id', array('options' => $roles, 'multiple' => true, 'label' => __('For', true), 'div' => false, true));
etc...
notice that I have not placed the form element in the ArosHandover data space; another way of saying this is that when the form request is sent the field aro_id will be placed under the array called Handover.
In the model under the variable $filterArgs:
'aro_id' => array('name' => 'aro_id', 'type' => 'subquery', 'method' => 'findByAros', 'field' => 'Handover.id')
notice that the type is 'subquery' as I mentioned above you need to create a subquery in order to be able to find the appropriate records and by setting the type to subquery you are telling CakeDC to create a subquery snippet of SQL. The method is the function name that are going to write the code under. The field element is the name of the field which is going to appear in this part of the example query above
WHERE Handover.id in
Then you write the function that will return the subquery:
function findByAros($data = array())
{
$ids = ''; //you need to make a comma separated list of the aro_ids that are going to be checked
foreach($data['aro_id'] as $k => $v)
{
$ids .= $v . ', ';
}
if($ids != '')
{
$ids = rtrim($ids, ', ');
}
//you only need to have these two lines in if you have not already attached the behaviours in the ArosHandover model file
$this->ArosHandover->Behaviors->attach('Containable', array('autoFields' => false));
$this->ArosHandover->Behaviors->attach('Search.Searchable');
$query = $this->ArosHandover->getQuery('all',
array(
'conditions' => array('ArosHandover.aro_id IN (' . $ids . ')'),
'fields' => array('handover_id'), //the other field that you need to check against, it's the other side of the many-to-many relationship
'contain' => false //place this in if you just want to have the ArosHandover table data included
)
);
return $query;
}
In the Handovers controller:
public $components = array('Search.Prg', 'Paginator'); //you can also place this into AppController
public $presetVars = true; //using $filterArgs in the model configuration
public $paginate = array(); //declare this so that you can change it
// this is the snippet of the search form processing
public function admin_find()
{
$this->set('title_for_layout','Find handovers');
$this->Prg->commonProcess();
if(isset($this->passedArgs) && !empty($this->passedArgs))
{//the following line passes the conditions into the Paginator component
$this->Paginator->settings = array('conditions' => $this->Handover->parseCriteria($this->passedArgs));
$handovers = $this->Paginator->paginate(); // this gets the data
$this->set('handovers', $handovers); // this passes it to the template
If you want any further explanation as to why I have done something, ask and if I get an email to tell me that you have asked I will give an answer if I am able to.
This is not an issue of the plugin but how you build the associations. You need to properly join them for a search across these three tables. Check how CakePHP is fetching the data from HABTM assocs by default.
http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/models/associations-linking-models-together.html#joining-tables
Suppose a Book hasAndBelongsToMany Tag association. This relation uses
a books_tags table as join table, so you need to join the books table
to the books_tags table, and this with the tags table:
$options['joins'] = array(
array('table' => 'books_tags',
'alias' => 'BooksTag',
'type' => 'inner',
'conditions' => array(
'Books.id = BooksTag.books_id'
)
),
array('table' => 'tags',
'alias' => 'Tag',
'type' => 'inner',
'conditions' => array(
'BooksTag.tag_id = Tag.id'
)
)
);
$options['conditions'] = array(
'Tag.tag' => 'Novel'
);
$books = $Book->find('all', $options); Using joins allows you to have
a maximum flexibility in how CakePHP handles associations and fetch
the data, however in most cases you can use other tools to achieve the
same results such as correctly defining associations, binding models
on the fly and using the Containable behavior. This feature should be
used with care because it could lead, in a few cases, into bad formed
SQL queries if combined with any of the former techniques described
for associating models.
Also your code is wrong somewhere.
Column not found: 1054 Unknown column 'contain' in 'where clause'
This means that $Model->contain() is somehow called. I don't see such a call in your code pasted here so it must be somewhere else. If a model method can not be found this error usually happens with the field name as column.
I want to share with everyone that the solution to working with HABTM searches with the plugin lies here: Using the CakeDC search plugin with associated models
#burzum, the documentation is far from ok man. Do you notice the use of 'type' => 'checkbox' and that it is not mentioned anywhere that it is a type?
Not to mention the total lack of grammar and the lots of typos and missing prepositions. I lost 2 days only to get a grasp of what the author had in mind and bind the words in there. No comment on that.
I am glad that after 5 days on the uphill work I made it. Thanks anyway for being helpful.

CakePHP - problem with HABTM paginate query

Tables
restaurants
cuisines
cuisines_restaurants
Both restaurant and cuisine model are set up to HABTM each other.
I'm trying to get a paginated list of restaurants where Cuisine.name = 'italian' (example), but keep getting this error:
1054: Unknown column 'Cuisine.name' in 'where clause'
Actual query it's building:
SELECT `Restaurant`.`id`, `Restaurant`.`type` .....
`Restaurant`.`modified`, `Restaurant`.`user_id`, `User`.`display_name`,
`User`.`username`, `User`.`id`, `City`.`id`,`City`.`lat` .....
FROM `restaurants` AS `Restaurant` LEFT JOIN `users` AS `User` ON
(`Restaurant`.`user_id` = `User`.`id`) LEFT JOIN `cities` AS `City` ON
(`Restaurant`.`city_id` = `City`.`id`) WHERE `Cuisine`.`name` = 'italian'
LIMIT 10
The "....." parts are just additional fields I removed to shorten the query to show you.
I'm no CakePHP pro, so hopefully there's some glaring error. I'm calling the paginate like this:
$this->paginate = array(
'conditions' => $opts,
'limit' => 10,
);
$data = $this->paginate('Restaurant');
$this->set('data', $data);
$opts is an array of options, one of which is 'Cuisine.name' => 'italian'
I also tried setting $this->Restaurant->recursive = 2; but that didn't seem to do anything (and I assume I shouldn't have to do that?)
Any help or direction is greatly appreciated.
EDIT
models/cuisine.php
var $hasAndBelongsToMany = array('Restaurant');
models/restaurant.php
var $hasAndBelongsToMany = array(
'Cuisine' => array(
'order' => 'Cuisine.name ASC'
),
'Feature' => array(
'order' => 'Feature.name ASC'
),
'Event' => array(
'order' => 'Event.start_date ASC'
)
);
As explained in this blogpost by me you have to put the condition of the related model in the contain option of your pagination array.
So something like this should work
# in your restaurant_controller.php
var $paginate = array(
'contain' => array(
'Cuisine' => array(
'conditions' => array('Cuisine.name' => 'italian')
)
),
'limit' => 10
);
# then, in your method (ie. index.php)
$this->set('restaurants', $this->paginate('Restaurant'));
This fails because Cake is actually using 2 different queries to generate your result set. As you've noticed, the first query doesn't even contain a reference to Cuisine.
As #vindia explained here, using the Containable behavior will usually fix this problem, but it doesn't work with Paginate.
Basically, you need a way to force Cake to look at Cuisine during the first query. This is not the way the framework usually does things, so it does, unfortunately, require constructing the join manually
. paginate takes the same options as Model->find('all'). Here, we need to use the joins option.
var $joins = array(
array(
'table' => '(SELECT cuisines.id, cuisines.name, cuisines_restaurants.restaurant_id
FROM cuisines_restaurants
JOIN cuisines ON cuisines_restaurants.cuisines_id = cuisines.id)',
'alias' => 'Cuisine',
'conditions' => array(
'Cuisine.restaurant_id = Restaurant.id',
'Cuisine.name = "italian"'
)
)
);
$this->paginate = array(
'conditions' => $opts,
'limit' => 10,
'joins' => $joins
);
This solution is a lot clunkier than the others, but has the advantage of working.
a few ideas on the top of my mind:
have you checked the model to see if the HABTM is well declared?
try using the containable behavior
in none of those work.. then you could always construct the joins for the paginator manually
good luck!
Cuisine must be a table (or alias) on the FROM clausule of your SELECT.
so the error:
1054: Unknown column 'Cuisine.name' in 'where clause'
Is just because it isn't referenced on the FROM clausule
If you remove the Feature and Event part of your HABTM link in the Restaurant model, does it work then?
Sounds to me like you've failed to define the right primary and foreing keys for the Cuisine model, as the HABTM model is not even including the Cuisine tabel in the query you posted here.

Categories