Is it possible to extract all methods out of a class instance and use them in the global space?
Say I have:
class Library {
public function num_one() { echo "number one"; }
public function num_two() { echo "number two"; }
}
After I load the class, I want to be able to use the functions without specifying the instance
include '/path/to/library-class.php';
$lib = new Library();
#$lib->num_one();
#$lib->num_two();
num_one();
num_two();
You could make them static, for example
class Library {
public static function num_one() { echo "number one"; }
public static function num_two() { echo "number two"; }
}
then you could use
Library::num_one()
Library::num_two()
You also wouldn't need the '$lib = new Library();' line then :)
I'm not sure why you'd need to do this, because one of the advantages of OOP is to encapsulate methods into namespaces safely and prevent collisions of function names.
However, if you absolutely need to do this (and I think you can and should refactor in a way to not have to do this), it can be done; you can add this to /path/to/library-class.php:
class Library {
public function num_one() { echo "number one"; }
public function num_two() { echo "number two"; }
}
$global_Library = new Library();
function num_one ($whateverParameter) {
global $global_Library;
return $global_Library->num_one($whateverParameter);
}
// Continue adding your wrapper functions here.
I'd still think that using static methods are better than what you're asking to do, even though they shouldn't be treated as a cure-all.
http://code.google.com/p/google-singleton-detector/wiki/WhySingletonsAreControversial
Related
Is there a way to call a function through variables?
For instance, I want to call the function Login(). Can I do this:
$varFunction = "Login"; //to call the function
Can I use $varFunction?
Yes, you can:
$varFunction();
Or:
call_user_func($varFunction);
Ensure that you validate $varFunction for malicious input.
For your modules, consider something like this (depending on your actual needs):
abstract class ModuleBase {
public function main() {
echo 'main on base';
}
}
class ModuleA extends ModuleBase {
public function main() {
parent::main();
echo 'a';
}
}
class ModuleB extends ModuleBase {
public function main() {
parent::main();
echo 'b';
}
}
function runModuleMain(ModuleBase $module) {
$module->main();
}
And then call runModuleMain() with the correct module instance.
You can use...
$varFunction = "Login";
$varFunction();
...and it goes without saying to make sure that the variable is trusted.
<?php
$fxname = 'helloWorld';
function helloWorld(){
echo "What a beautiful world!";
}
$fxname(); //echos What a beautiful world!
?>
I successfully call the function as follows:
$methodName = 'Login';
$classInstance = new ClassName();
$classInstance->$methodName($arg1, $arg2, $arg3);
It works with PHP 5.3.0+
I'm also working in Laravel.
If it's in the same class:
$funcName = 'Login';
// Without arguments:
$this->$funcName();
// With arguments:
$this->$funcName($arg1, $arg2);
// Also acceptable:
$this->{$funcName}($arg1, $arg2)
If it's in a different class:
$someClass = new SomeClass(); // create new if it doesn't already exist in a variable
$someClass->$funcName($arg1, $arg2);
// Also acceptable:
$someClass->{$funcName}($arg1, $arg2)
Tip:
If the function name is dynamic as well:
$step = 2;
$this->{'handleStep' . $step}($arg1, $arg2);
// or
$someClass->{'handleStep' . $step}($arg1, $arg2);
This will call handleStep1(), handleStep2(), etc. depending on the value of $step.
You really should consider using classes for modules, as this would allow you to both have consistent code structure and keep method names identical for several modules. This will also give you the flexibility in inheriting or changing the code for every module.
On the topic, other than calling methods as stated above (that is, using variables as function names, or call_user_func_* functions family), starting with PHP 5.3 you can use closures that are dynamic anonymous functions, which could provide you with an alternative way to do what you want.
It's possible to extend classes during runtime, and I've been playing around with it a bit, but then I stumbled upon this, which to me is strange. If I define a new variable in a private function it becomes a public variable. Shouldn't it at least be protected?
Here's the code that I've used to test this:
class FooBar {
public function FooBar() {
$this->t();
}
public function createVariable() {
$this->NewVar();
}
private function NewVar() {
$this->iam = "Hello you!";
}
private function t() {
$this->T = "ballad";
return $this->T;
}
}
$fb = new FooBar();
echo $fb->T;
echo "<br/>";
var_dump($fb);
$fb->createVariable();
echo $fb->iam;
echo "<br/>";
var_dump($fb);
echo "<br/>";
$fb->outer = "okay";
echo $fb->outer;
And as an extra, since it's possible to extend a class during runtime why isn't this possible:
function foo() {
private $this->anewvar = 0; //private is illegal.
}
PHP allows variables to be instantiated at any time without explicitly defining them.
But since you haven't defined the variable explicitly, PHP doesn't know how you want it to be scoped, and it has no way for you to tell it either, so it just goes with the safest possible option and makes it public.
If you want it scoped privately, define it as a private variable in the class definition.
I have a similar code snippet like this
class Search
{
public function search($for, $regEx, $flag) //I would like this to be the constructor
{
// logic here
return $this;
}
}
Then I have another class that creates an object from it, later than tries to use the object.
class MyClass
{
public function start()
{
$this->search = new Search();
}
public function load()
{
$this->search($for, $regEx, $flag);
}
}
My question is, is it possible to create an object first THEN give it the parameters?
I know there are some way around this BUT I only ask because I want to use the object like this
$this->search($params);
// I have my methods chained, so I could use it in one line like
// $this->search($params)->hasResults();
if ($this->search->hasResults()) {
echo 'found stuff';
} else {
echo 'didn't find anything';
}
The way I have it set up right now, I would need to use it like this
$this->search->search($params);
if ($this->search->hasResults()) {
echo 'found stuff';
} else {
echo 'didn't find anything';
}
I have a method called search() that does the logic, and I don't want to be redundant in my naming nor do I want to change the name of the method.
I know another way to keep the visual appeal sane I could pass a variable like so
$search = $this->search->search($params);
then
$search->hasResults();
At the same time I am trying to introduce myself to new OOP concepts and learn from them. Would this require passing things by reference? or setting up some type of magic method?
While the previous anwsers show that you can, I wouldn't use it, because it breaks the concept of encapsulation. A proper way to achieve what you want is the following
class Search
{
public function __constructor($for='', $regEx='', $flag='')
{
$this->Setup($for, $regEx, $flag);
}
public function Setup($for, $regEx, $flag)
{
//assign params
//clear last result search
//chain
return $this;
}
public function search()
{
// logic here
return $this;
}
}
In this way, you can reuse the object and have the params in the constructor, without breaking encapsulation.
Yes it is possible
See the below example
<?php
class a{
public $a = 5;
public function __construct($var){
$this->a = $var;
}
}
$delta = new a(10);
echo $delta->a."\n";
$delta->__construct(15);
echo $delta->a."\n";
Output will be:
10 15
Yep, you can.
class Example {
public $any;
function __counstruct($parameters,$some_text) {
$this->any=$some_text;
return $this->any;
}
}
You can call constructor:
$obj = new Example (true,'hello');
echo $obj->any;
$obj->__construct(true,'bye-bye');
echo $obj->any;
I was able to create the visual coding I wanted by using the __call() magic method like this
public function __call($name, $params)
{
$call = ucfirst($name);
$this->$name = new $call($params);
}
from there I could use this
$this->test->search($params);
$this->test->search->hasResults();
I of course now set the search() method to the class constructor
I came to know about mixins.So my doubt is, is it possible to use mixins in php?If yes then how?
Use Trait introduced in PHP 5.4
<?php
class Base {
public function sayHello() {
echo 'Hello ';
}
}
trait SayWorld {
public function sayHello() {
parent::sayHello();
echo 'World!';
}
}
class MyHelloWorld extends Base {
use SayWorld;
}
$o = new MyHelloWorld();
$o->sayHello();
?>
which prints Hello World!
http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.traits.php
This answer is obsolete as of PHP 5.4. See Jeanno's answer for how to use traits.
It really depends on what level of mixins you want from PHP. PHP handles single-inheritance, and abstract classes, which can get you most of the way.
Of course the best part of mixins is that they're interchangeable snippets added to whatever class needs them.
To get around the multiple inheritance issue, you could use include to pull in snippets of code. You'll likely have to dump in some boilerplate code to get it to work properly in some cases, but it would certainly help towards keeping your programs DRY.
Example:
class Foo
{
public function bar( $baz )
{
include('mixins/bar');
return $result;
}
}
class Fizz
{
public function bar( $baz )
{
include('mixins/bar');
return $result;
}
}
It's not as direct as being able to define a class as class Foo mixin Bar, but it should get you most of the way there. There are some drawbacks: you need to keep the same parameter names and return variable names, you'll need to pass other data that relies on context such as func_get_args_array or __FILE__.
Mixins for PHP (PHP does not implement Mixins natively, but this library will help)
First google result for "php5 mixin": http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/php-application-design-147/ruby-like-mixins-php5-332491.html
First google result for "php mixin": http://www.advogato.org/article/470.html
Short answer: yes, but not natively (yet, evidently, as #mchl notes). Check those out.
Longer answer: if you're using runkit, checkout runkit_method_copy(): "Copies a method from class to another."
I based mixins functionality on the blog entry found at jansch.nl.
class Node
{
protected $__decorator_lookup = array();
public function __construct($classes = array())
{
foreach($classes as $class)
if (class_exists($class))
{
$decorator = new $class($this);
$methods = get_class_methods($decorator);
if (is_array($methods))
foreach($methods as $method)
$this->__decorator_lookup[strtolower($method)] = $decorator;
}
else
trigger_error("Tried to inherit non-existant class", E_USER_ERROR);
}
public function __get($name)
{
switch($name)
{
default:
if ($this->__decorator_lookup[strtolower($name)])
return $this->__call($name);
}
}
public function __call($method, $args = array())
{
if(isset($this->__decorator_lookup[strtolower($method)]))
return call_user_func_array(array($this->__decorator_lookup[strtolower($method)], $method), $args);
else
trigger_error("Call to undefined method " . get_class($this) . "::$method()", E_USER_ERROR);
}
public function __clone()
{
$temp = $this->decorators;
$this->decorators = array();
foreach($temp as $decorator)
{
$new = clone($decorator);
$new->__self = $this;
$this->decorators[] = $new;
}
}
}
class Decorator
{
public $__self;
public function __construct($__self)
{
$this->__self = $__self;
}
public function &__get($key)
{
return $this->__self->$key;
}
public function __call($method, $arguments)
{
return call_user_func_array(array($this->__self, $method), $arguments);
}
public function __set($key, $value)
{
$this->__self->$key = $value;
}
}
class Pretty extends Decorator
{
public function A()
{
echo "a";
}
public function B()
{
$this->b = "b";
}
}
$a = new Node(array("Pretty"));
$a->A(); // outputs "a"
$a->B();
echo($a->b); // outputs "b"
EDIT:
As PHP clone is shallow, added __clone support.
Also, bear in mind that unset WON'T work (or at least I've not managed to make it work) within the mixin. So - doing something like unset($this->__self->someValue); won't unset the value on Node. Don't know why, as in theory it should work. Funny enough unset($this->__self->someValue); var_dump(isset($this->__self->someValue)); will produce correctly false, however accessing the value from Node scope (as Node->someValue) will still produce true. There's some strange voodoo there.
I've got an Abstract PHP superclass, which contains code that needs to know which subclass its running under.
class Foo {
static function _get_class_name() {
return get_called_class();
//works in PHP 5.3.*, but not in PHP 5.2.*
}
static function other_code() {
//needs to know
echo self::_get_class_name();
}
}
class Bar extends Foo {
}
class FooBar extends Foo {
}
Bar::other_code(); // i need 'Bar'
FooBar::other_code(); // i need 'FooBar'
This would work if I called the function get_called_class() -- however, this code is going to be run in PHP version 5.2.*, so that function is not available.
There's some custom PHP implementations of get_called_class() out there, but they all rely on going thru the debug_backtrack(), parsing a file name & line number, and running a regex (as the coder is not aware that PHP 5.2 has reflection) to find the class name. This code needs to be able to be run with php, ie. not only from a .php file. (It needs to work from a php -a shell, or an eval() statement.)
Ideally, a solution would work without requiring any code to be added to the subclasses… The only potential solution I can see though is adding the following code to each subclass, which is obviously a disgusting hack:
class FooBar extends Foo {
static function _get_class_name() {
return 'FooBar';
}
}
EDIT: Wait, this doesn't even seem to work. It would've been my last resort. Can anybody think of something similar to this solution that'd get me the required functionality. Ie., I'm willing to accept a solution that requires me to add one function or variable to each subclass telling it what its class name is. Unfortunately, it seems that calling self::_get_class_name() from the superclass calls the parent class' implementation, even if the subclass has overridden it.
In reality it is often helpful to know the actual called (sub)class when executing a superclass method, and I disagree that there's anything wrong with wanting to solve this problem.
Example, my objects need to know the class name, but what they do with that information is always the same and could be extracted into a superclass method IF I was able to get the called class name. Even the PHP team thought this was useful enough to include in php 5.3.
The correct and un-preachy answer, as far as I can tell, is that prior to 5.3, you have to either do something heinous (e.g. backtrace,) or just include duplicate code in each of the subclasses.
Working solution:
function getCalledClass(){
$arr = array();
$arrTraces = debug_backtrace();
foreach ($arrTraces as $arrTrace){
if(!array_key_exists("class", $arrTrace)) continue;
if(count($arr)==0) $arr[] = $arrTrace['class'];
else if(get_parent_class($arrTrace['class'])==end($arr)) $arr[] = $arrTrace['class'];
}
return end($arr);
}
This is not possible.
The concept of "called class" was introduced in PHP 5.3. This information was not tracked in previous versions.
As an ugly work-around, you could possibly use debug_backtrace to look into the call stack, but it's not equivalent. For instance, in PHP 5.3, using ClassName::method() doesn't forward the static call; you have no way to tell this with debug_backtrace. Also, debug_backtrace is relatively slow.
The PHP/5.2 alternative to late static binding that keeps duplicate code to the minimum while avoiding weird hacks would be to create one-liners on child classes that pass the class name as argument:
abstract class Transaction{
public $id;
public function __construct($id){
$this->id = $id;
}
protected static function getInstanceHelper($class_name, $id){
return new $class_name($id);
}
}
class Payment extends Transaction{
public static function getInstance($id){
return parent::getInstanceHelper(__CLASS__, $id);
}
}
class Refund extends Transaction{
public static function getInstance($id){
return parent::getInstanceHelper(__CLASS__, $id);
}
}
var_dump( Payment::getInstance(1), Refund::getInstance(2) );
object(Payment)#1 (1) {
["id"]=>
int(1)
}
object(Refund)#2 (1) {
["id"]=>
int(2)
}
The solution is:
get_class($this);
However, I don't know if this sentence works in static functions. Give it a try and tell me your feedback.
This hack includes the heinous use of debug_backtrace... not pretty, but it does the job:
<?php
function callerName($functionName=null)
{
$btArray = debug_backtrace();
$btIndex = count($btArray) - 1;
while($btIndex > -1)
{
if(!isset($btArray[$btIndex]['file']))
{
$btIndex--;
if(isset($matches[1]))
{
if(class_exists($matches[1]))
{
return $matches[1];
}
else
{
continue;
}
}
else
{
continue;
}
}
else
{
$lines = file($btArray[$btIndex]['file']);
$callerLine = $lines[$btArray[$btIndex]['line']-1];
if(!isset($functionName))
{
preg_match('/([a-zA-Z\_]+)::/',
$callerLine,
$matches);
}
else
{
preg_match('/([a-zA-Z\_]+)::'.$functionName.'/',
$callerLine,
$matches);
}
$btIndex--;
if(isset($matches[1]))
{
if(class_exists($matches[1]))
{
return $matches[1];
}
else
{
continue;
}
}
else
{
continue;
}
}
}
return $matches[1];
}
I have asked a question like this before, because I wanted a parent to have a factory method that was something like this
public static function factory() {
return new __CLASS__;
}
But it always returned the parent class, not the inherited one.
I was told that it is not possible without late static binding. It was introduced in PHP 5.3. You can read the documentation.
This function does the same job but works with instances too:
if (!function_exists('get_called_class')) {
function get_called_class() {
$bt = debug_backtrace();
/*
echo '<br><br>';
echo '<pre>';
print_r($bt);
echo '</pre>';
*/
if (self::$fl == $bt[1]['file'] . $bt[1]['line']) {
self::$i++;
} else {
self::$i = 0;
self::$fl = $bt[1]['file'] . $bt[1]['line'];
}
if ($bt[1]['type'] == '::') {
$lines = file($bt[1]['file']);
preg_match_all('/([a-zA-Z0-9\_]+)::' . $bt[1]['function'] . '/', $lines[$bt[1]['line'] - 1], $matches);
$result = $matches[1][self::$i];
} else if ($bt[1]['type'] == '->') {
$result = get_class($bt[1]['object']);
}
return $result;
}
}
<?php
class Foo {
private static $instance;
static function _get_class_name() {
return self::myNameIs();
}
static function other_code() {
//needs to know
echo self::_get_class_name();
}
}
class Bar extends Foo {
public static function myNameIs() {
self::$instance = new Bar();
return get_class(self::$instance);
}
}
class FooBar extends Foo {
public static function myNameIs() {
self::$instance = new FooBar();
return get_class(self::$instance);
}
}
Bar::other_code(); // i need 'Bar'
FooBar::other_code(); // i need 'FooBar'