I am building up a user creation page (controller/module: User) which has UI controls (DOJO filterselectbox, username, etc.). The UI controls get populated with a Json service deployed as module (module name/controller) myService, and action populatelist().
populatelist returns data as Json to client and the client dojo ui elements use that as a memory store.
I have 2 modules, User and myService. For the User module, I have setup default page as register and in register.phtml as given below. I have added logic for user input validation and data post.
module.config.php of module: User
'defaults' => array(
'controller' => 'User\Controller\User',
'action' => 'register',
),
Json is registered in module myService. register.phtml makes a call like:
myservice = new dojo.rpc.JsonService("myService/populatelist");
var dojoDeferredObject=myservice.getCategoryList();
//comment: getCtegoryList is actual method of remote object which returns the json data
When I open the url as http://localhost/user, any reference to myService JSONRPC call works perfectly fine: it parses the JSON call as http://localhost/myService/populatelist and I get the data I need.
When I access the url as http://localhost/user/register, things fail with 404 page not found exception for every Json RPC call. Reason is, the RPC call is going on a non-existent path, i.e. http://localhost/user/myService/populatelist instead of http://localhost/myService/populatelist.
Somewhere I have missed a configuration which is resulting in this issue. I do not want to hardcode path of Json service Module myService.
I believe the problem is this line:
$server->setTarget('myService/populatelist');
in the below code, used to set up the Json Service. This is adding up to the path which does not exist. But I am not sure how can I control it as I want a separate module for Json service.
$class = "MOCAPI\Model\MOCGuest";
$server = new Server();
$server->setClass($class);
//echo $_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'];
if ('GET' == $_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD']) {
$server->setTarget('myService/populatelist')
->setEnvelope(Smd::ENV_JSONRPC_2);
$smd = $server->getServiceMap();
// Set Dojo compatibility:
$smd->setDojoCompatible(true);
header('Content-Type: application/json');
echo $smd;
return $this->getResponse();
} else {
//$server->handle();
}
You should use routes and url() helper to build urls and relative and absolutes paths, instead of raw 'myService/populatelist'.
Check the docs at https://framework.zend.com/manual/2.4/en/modules/zend.view.helpers.url.html (version 2.4, but it almost the same in zf2.* and zf3).
Related
Hi i'm pretty new on create endpoints in php.
Now i have to create a little endpoint to intercept some updates from electronic invoice service.
From admin panel of the service i can specify endpoint url where my application is located.
For example I indicate: www.example.com/api/endpoint/index.php
NOte: If I set only www.example.com/api/endpoint/, panel admin tell me there is an error - page not found
Now in the admin panel I see I can intercept these POST methods:
/createInvoice
/createNotification
But i don't undertand HOW to differentiate there 2 methods...
Actually in my index.php i've:
<?php
function call_create_invoice(
...
);
function call_create_notification(
...
);
header('Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8');
var_dump($_POST);
If I use POSTMAN to do some test using POST call, i can correctly see $_POST parameters sent.... but i don't understand how to:
call call_create_invoice function if /createInvoice is called
call call_create_notification function if /createNotification is called
If you would stick to vanilla PHP, you need to parse the request URI to call the desired function like:
$path = $SERVER['REQUEST_URI'];
switch($path) {
case('/createInvoice'):
call_create_invoice();
break;
case('/createNotification'):
call_create_notification();
break;
}
As requirements grow, it may make sense to use a minimal PHP framework with routing functionality, such as Laravel Lumen.
I have a controller has an action that looks something like this:
/**
* #Route("/my_route_path", name="my_route_name")
*/
public function doSomethingAction(Request $request)
{
$myPath = $request->getScheme().'://'.$request->getHttpHost().''.$request->getBasePath();
$data = file_get_contents($myPath. '/data_folder/data.json');
return $this->render('#Entry/my_template.html.twig', array(
'data' => json_decode($data, true)
));
}
And I create a functional test for this controller like this:
/** #test */
public function doSomething_should_success()
{
$client = static::createClient();
$crawler = $client->request('GET', '/my_route_path');
$this->assertEquals(200, $client->getResponse()->getStatusCode());
}
But I can't run the functional test I still get : Failed asserting that 500 is identical to 200
So, after I checked the test.log file I find this error : file_get_contents(http://localhost/data_folder/data.json) : failed to open stream
As now the problem is comming from $request->getBasePath() because always contain empty string but the expected behaviour is return PATH_TO_MY_PROJECT_FOLDER\web in my case must return projects\web_apps\MY_PROJECT_FOLDER_NAME\web
So, the simplified question: why the request object always contain an empty basePath string in the unit test but it works very well on the browser.
The Request object helps you handle the request of a client, that is something like GET /my_route_path plus lots of headers and a server that is directed at.
The web server passes those information on to php and symfony, and symfony will turn this into a Request object. Symfony has usually one entry point, which is public/index.php (symfony 4) or web/app.php (symfony 3) which is assumed to be / or possibly /basePath/ (the basepath will be communicated by the web server and handled by Symfony).
Symfony will generate a Request object, where the basepath is essentially abstracted away, and whenever you generate a url (via Controller::generateUrl) the base path is taken into account. that's why the basepath is important for Requests.
This is actually described pretty well in the comments of the Request's functions:
getBasePath vs getPathInfo.
However, this only concerns the public facing URLs and doesn't have anything to do with how you structure your project and where that project is located, because that's completely irrelevant to the Request (separation of concerns and stuff).
So I guess, you are actually looking for the root directory of your project.
To find the location of your project dir, there is the very base version, where you directly use the PHP magic var __DIR__ which contains the directory the current script file is in, and you can navigate from there. since controllers are usually located such that their path is projectdir/src/Controller/TheController.php a __DIR__.'/../.. would give you the projectdir. However, that's not really clean. The better version:
Depending on the symfony version you're using, you should retrieve the project dir via the ParameterBagInterface (symfony 4)
function doSomethingAction(ParameterBagInterface $params) {
$projectDir = $params->get('kernel.project_dir');
}
or via the container (symfony 3) see also: new in symfony 3.3: A simpler way to get the project root directory
function doSomethingAction() {
$projectDir = $this->getParameter('kernel.project_dir');
}
In my case I had to inyect RequestStack $stackand access the main request, after that my "BasePath" has value. This is because I where in a subrequest and I had to access to the top level of the request.
This post helped me to understood: Symfony2 - get main request's current route in twig partial/subrequest
/**
* #Route("/myroute", name="myroute")
*/
public function myroute(RequestStack $stack)
{
$request = $stack->getMainRequest();
$route = $request->getPathInfo();
}
I have asked this question yesterday as well, but this one includes code.
Issue
My application have multiple modules and 2 types of user accounts, Some modules are loaded always which are present in application.config.php some of them are conditional i.e. some are loaded for user type A and some for user type B
After going through documentations and questions on Stack Overflow, I understand some of ModuleManager functionalities and started implementing the logic that I though might work.
Some how I figured out a way to load the modules that are not present in application.config.php [SUCCESS] but their configuration is not working [THE ISSUE] i.e. if in onBootstrap method I get the ModuleManager service and do getLoadedModules() I get the list of all the modules correctly loaded. Afterwards if I try to get some service from that dynamically loaded module, it throws exception.
Zend\ServiceManager\ServiceManager::get was unable to fetch or create an instance for jobs_mapper
Please note that, the factories and all other stuff are perfectly fine because if I load the module from application.config.php it works fine
Similarly when I try to access any route from the dynamically loaded module it throws 404 Not Found which made it clear that the configuration from module.config.php of these modules are not loading even though the module is loaded by ModuleManager.
Code
In Module.php of my Application module I implemented InitProviderInterface and added a method init(ModuleManager $moduleManager) where I catch the moduleManager loadModules.post event trigger and load modules
public function init(\Zend\ModuleManager\ModuleManagerInterface $moduleManager)
{
$eventManager = $moduleManager->getEventManager();
$eventManager->attach(\Zend\ModuleManager\ModuleEvent::EVENT_LOAD_MODULES_POST, [$this, 'onLoadModulesPost']);
}
Then in the same class I delcare the method onLoadModulesPost and start loading my dynamic modules
public function onLoadModulesPost(\Zend\ModuleManager\ModuleEvent $event)
{
/* #var $serviceManager \Zend\ServiceManager\ServiceManager */
$serviceManager = $event->getParam('ServiceManager');
$configListener = $event->getConfigListener();
$authentication = $serviceManager->get('zfcuser_auth_service');
if ($authentication->getIdentity())
{
$moduleManager = $event->getTarget();
...
...
$loadedModules = $moduleManager->getModules();
$configListener = $event->getConfigListener();
$configuration = $configListener->getMergedConfig(false);
$modules = $modulesMapper->findAll(['is_agency' => 1, 'is_active' => 1]);
foreach ($modules as $module)
{
if (!array_key_exists($module['module_name'], $loadedModules))
{
$loadedModule = $moduleManager->loadModule($module['module_name']);
//Add modules to the modules array from ModuleManager.php
$loadedModules[] = $module['module_name'];
//Get the loaded module
$module = $moduleManager->getModule($module['module_name']);
//If module is loaded succesfully, merge the configs
if (($loadedModule instanceof ConfigProviderInterface) || (is_callable([$loadedModule, 'getConfig'])))
{
$moduleConfig = $module->getConfig();
$configuration = ArrayUtils::merge($configuration, $moduleConfig);
}
}
}
$moduleManager->setModules($loadedModules);
$configListener->setMergedConfig($configuration);
$event->setConfigListener($configListener);
}
}
Questions
Is it possible to achieve what I am trying ?
If so, what is the best way ?
What am I missing in my code ?
I think there is some fundamental mistake in what you are trying to do here: you are trying to load modules based on merged configuration, and therefore creating a cyclic dependency between modules and merged configuration.
I would advise against this.
Instead, if you have logic that defines which part of an application is to be loaded, put it in config/application.config.php, which is responsible for retrieving the list of modules.
At this stage though, it is too early to depend on any service, as service definition depends on the merged configuration too.
Another thing to clarify is that you are trying to take these decisions depending on whether the authenticated user (request information, rather than environment information) matches a certain criteria, and then modifying the entire application based on that.
Don't do that: instead, move the decision into the component that is to be enabled/disabled conditionally, by putting a guard in front of it.
What you're asking can be done, but that doesn't mean you should.
Suggesting an appropriate solution without knowing the complexity of the application you're building is difficult.
Using guards will certainly help decouple your code, however using it alone doesn't address scalability and maintainability, if that's a concern?
I'd suggest using stateless token-based authentication. Instead of maintaining the validation logic in every application, write the validation logic at one common place so that every request can make use of that logic irrespective of application. Choosing a reverse proxy server (Nginx) to maintain the validation logic (with the help of Lua) gives you the flexibility to develop your application in any language.
More to the point, validating the credentials at the load balancer level essentially eliminates the need for the session state, you can have many separate servers, running on multiple platforms and domains, reusing the same token for authenticating the user.
Identifying the user, account type and loading different modules then becomes a trivial task. By simply passing the token information via an environment variable, it can be read within your config/application.config.php file, without needing to access the database, cache or other services beforehand.
I'm creating a project which uses CakePHP framework, and the PHP OAuth module.
The reason I'm using the module over a Vendor plugin is because the APIs need to have data/custom headers sent to them or else they generate 500s, and I know the standard PHP module does this well.
The issue is that when I use OAuth->fetch("http://www.example.com" ...), CakePHP redirects the external fetch request to my localhost (which I'm developing on), thus resulting in no data being generated.
It looks like the only way I can get external data is by using CakePHP's HTTPSocket class, but that doesn't allow me to send that data I need to send to the OAuth provider.
Does anyone know how to turn off this routing, or if I should be doing something differently?
UPDATE : Currently code is as follows:
public function createClient() {
$client = new OAuth(
'key',
'secret'
);
$client->disableSSLChecks();
if ($accessToken = $this->getAccessToken() !== false) {
$client->setToken(
$accessToken[$this->accessTokenKeyKeyname],
$accessToken[$this->accessTokenSecretKeyname]
);
}
return $client;
}
$url = 'http://example.com';
$client = $this->createClient();
$client->fetch($url, null, OAUTH_HTTP_METHOD_GET);
The request/access tokens are generated successfully, but the fetch continues to redirect to localhost, instead of example.com (example.com being used as an example URL).
I received a manual to internal SOAP interface of my partner. It says:
MyPARTNER web services are provided in the form of a SOAP interface. The service is available in this URL: https://justsomeurl.com:435/soap
then some bla bla about authorization etc. and then a part about Accessible Methods:
pull()
The PULL method is used for pulling data from the database. The method
receives a unique data based parameter under an internal name
requestXML. This parameter contains data in a structured XML format.
String pull(String requestXML)
The XML contains data required to make the request, and the response
data is sent back.
then some other methods, error codes, it's not important here...
The problem is that I'm totally unexperienced in SOAP so I don't know how to use this interface via PHP. I've tried to find some examples, tutorials and I am now little bit more informed about SOAP and its functionality but still haven't found any advice about how to use interface like this...
thanx for any help
Php comes with PHP SOAP libraries, that usually are included and enabled after a common php installation.
Yuo are asked to biuld the client part of the webservice pattern. Your partner should provide you the .wsdl of the web service. The wsdl describes the avialble method, the parameters they need and what they return.
Tipically parameters and return values are array structures
This could be a skeleton for your code:
//build a client for the service
$client = new SoapClient("partner.wsdl");
//$client is now a sort of object where you can call functions
//prepare the xml parameter
$requestXML = array("parameter" => "<xml>Hello</xml>");
//call the pull function this is like
$result = $client->__soapCall("pull", $requestXML );
//print the value returned by the web service
print_r($result);
Here follows a non-wsdl example
First the location paramater is the address the SOAP request will be sent to.
The uri parameter is the target namespace of the SOAP service. This is related to xml namespaces.
A sample code for you could be:
//for URI specification you should watch your partners documentation. maybe also a fake uri (like mine) could work
//build a client for the service
$client = new SoapClient(null, array(
'location' =>
"https://justsomeurl.com:435/soap",
'uri' => "urn:WebServices",
'trace' => 1 ));
// Once built a non-wsdl web service works as a wsdl one
//$client is now a sort of object where you can call functions
//prepare the xml parameter
$requestXML = array("parameter" => "<xml>Hello</xml>");
//call the pull function this is like
$result = $client->__soapCall("pull", $requestXML );
//print the value returned by the web service
print_r($result);
Here a useful link: http://www.herongyang.com/PHP/SOAP-Use-SOAP-Extension-in-non-WSDL-Mode.html