I'm making a website for an e-commerce purpose. On the main page there will be a permanent text-block or a featured article, which is going to display information about latest money transactions.
For security reasons I want to hide the source where this information is coming from. So I decided to create 2 sites:
a) "Main Site" (MS): will be a fully custom site with an engine, which will be responsible to deal with and handle financial transactions. This site will contain all financial data and will be known/accessible only for limited people.
b) "Customer Site" (CS): will provide basic information along with "Latest transaction" page.
Main point is that "Latest transaction" on CS will be just a static copy of "latest" table in MS database and will not be available to be tracked back, as it will be uploaded/input from MS side each time when there is a new transaction. I presume that even if someone dumps the CS database, he/she will only be able to get a plain-text, without reaching the core database in MS. Because data input will be one-way from MS to CS.
Here is the draft scheme how I assume it to be, but don't know how to do:
Database-to-Database: to write a custom php file, which will be triggered after a new transaction and copy "latest" table values from MS database to a "latest" table in CS database.
Thanking in advance for any ideas, guides and especially for inputs.
If both db's are sql server, give MS permission to write to CS. Then write a trigger on MS that populates CS according to your requirements.
php involvement is unnecessary.
Related
I was looking around and couldn't find an answer for this question. If however, it is duplicated in some way, I apologise.
My problem is: I have a physical store, which has a accounting program with some database where my products are. I now created a store with prestashop and wanted to synchronise both of them.
I want to be able to add a REF to my prestashop and take every field from my LOCAL DB (except images and descriptions); I also want to synchronise the STOCKS in "real time".
My idea is having a "middle DB" which takes requests and updates the other 2 DB, as such:
Prestashop DB <-> MIDDLE DB <-> Local DB
My middle DB would have the REFs and Quantities for all the products and check if the latter field is changed in either DB, let's say every 2 mins, to then update the database that did NOT perform the request.
How difficult is it to do this? How can I connect to both databases, using python, c# or c++ and perform such tasks?
I'm using prestashop 1.6. and I have access to my database via PHPmyAdmin.
Thank you!
I'm looking for some general strategies for synchronizing data on a central server with client applications that are not always online.
In my particular case, I have an android phone application with an sqlite database and a PHP web application with a MySQL database.
Users will be able to add and edit information on the phone application and on the web application. I need to make sure that changes made one place are reflected everywhere even when the phone is not able to immediately communicate with the server.
I am not concerned with how to transfer data from the phone to the server or vice versa. I'm mentioning my particular technologies only because I cannot use, for example, the replication features available to MySQL.
I know that the client-server data synchronization problem has been around for a long, long time and would like information - articles, books, advice, etc - about patterns for handling the problem. I'd like to know about general strategies for dealing with synchronization to compare strengths, weaknesses and trade-offs.
The first thing you have to decide is a general policy about which side is considered "authoritative" in case of conflicting changes.
I.e.: suppose Record #125 is changed on the server on January 5th at 10pm and the same record is changed on one of the phones (let's call it Client A) on January 5th at 11pm.
Last synch was on Jan 3rd. Then the user reconnects on, say, January 8th.
Identifying what needs to be changed is "easy" in the sense that both the client and the server know the date of the last synch, so anything created or updated (see below for more on this) since the last synch needs to be reconciled.
So, suppose that the only changed record is #125.
You either decide that one of the two automatically "wins" and overwrites the other, or you need to support a reconcile phase where a user can decide which version (server or client) is the correct one, overwriting the other.
This decision is extremely important and you must weight the "role" of the clients. Especially if there is a potential conflict not only between client and server, but in case different clients can change the same record(s).
[Assuming that #125 can be modified by a second client (Client B) there is a chance that Client B, which hasn't synched yet, will provide yet another version of the same record, making the previous conflict resolution moot]
Regarding the "created or updated" point above... how can you properly identify a record if it has been originated on one of the clients (assuming this makes sense in your problem domain)?
Let's suppose your app manages a list of business contacts. If Client A says you have to add a newly created John Smith, and the server has a John Smith created yesterday by Client D... do you create two records because you cannot be certain that they aren't different persons? Will you ask the user to reconcile this conflict too?
Do clients have "ownership" of a subset of data? I.e. if Client B is setup to be the "authority" on data for Area #5 can Client A modify/create records for Area #5 or not? (This would make some conflict resolution easier, but may prove unfeasible for your situation).
To sum it up the main problems are:
How to define "identity" considering that detached clients may not have accessed the server before creating a new record.
The previous situation, no matter how sophisticated the solution, may result in data duplication, so you must foresee how to periodically solve these and how to inform the clients that what they considered as "Record #675" has actually been merged with/superseded by Record #543
Decide if conflicts will be resolved by fiat (e.g. "The server version always trumps the client's if the former has been updated since the last synch") or by manual intervention
In case of fiat, especially if you decide that the client takes precedence, you must also take care of how to deal with other, not-yet-synched clients that may have some more changes coming.
The previous items don't take in account the granularity of your data (in order to make things simpler to describe). Suffice to say that instead of reasoning at the "Record" level, as in my example, you may find more appropriate to record change at the field level, instead. Or to work on a set of records (e.g. Person record + Address record + Contacts record) at a time treating their aggregate as a sort of "Meta Record".
Bibliography:
More on this, of course, on Wikipedia.
A simple synchronization algorithm by the author of Vdirsyncer
OBJC article on data synch
SyncML®: Synchronizing and Managing Your Mobile Data (Book on O'Reilly Safari)
Conflict-free Replicated Data Types
Optimistic Replication YASUSHI SAITO (HP Laboratories) and MARC SHAPIRO (Microsoft Research Ltd.) - ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. V, No. N, 3 2005.
Alexander Traud, Juergen Nagler-Ihlein, Frank Kargl, and Michael Weber. 2008. Cyclic Data Synchronization through Reusing SyncML. In Proceedings of the The Ninth International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM '08). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 165-172. DOI=10.1109/MDM.2008.10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MDM.2008.10
Lam, F., Lam, N., and Wong, R. 2002. Efficient synchronization for mobile XML data. In Proceedings of the Eleventh international Conference on information and Knowledge Management (McLean, Virginia, USA, November 04 - 09, 2002). CIKM '02. ACM, New York, NY, 153-160. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/584792.584820
Cunha, P. R. and Maibaum, T. S. 1981. Resource &equil; abstract data type + synchronization - A methodology for message oriented programming -. In Proceedings of the 5th international Conference on Software Engineering (San Diego, California, United States, March 09 - 12, 1981). International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 263-272.
(The last three are from the ACM digital library, no idea if you are a member or if you can get those through other channels).
From the Dr.Dobbs site:
Creating Apps with SQL Server CE and SQL RDA by Bill Wagner May 19, 2004 (Best practices for designing an application for both the desktop and mobile PC - Windows/.NET)
From arxiv.org:
A Conflict-Free Replicated JSON Datatype - the paper describes a JSON CRDT implementation (Conflict-free replicated datatypes - CRDTs - are a family of data structures that support concurrent modification and that guarantee convergence of such concurrent updates).
I would recommend that you have a timestamp column in every table and every time you insert or update, update the timestamp value of each affected row. Then, you iterate over all tables checking if the timestamp is newer than the one you have in the destination database. If it´s newer, then check if you have to insert or update.
Observation 1: be aware of physical deletes since the rows are deleted from source db and you have to do the same at the server db. You can solve this avoiding physical deletes or logging every deletes in a table with timestamps. Something like this: DeletedRows = (id, table_name, pk_column, pk_column_value, timestamp) So, you have to read all the new rows of DeletedRows table and execute a delete at the server using table_name, pk_column and pk_column_value.
Observation 2: be aware of FK since inserting data in a table that´s related to another table could fail. You should deactivate every FK before data synchronization.
If anyone is dealing with similar design issue and needs to synchronize changes across multiple Android devices I recommend checking Google Cloud Messaging for Android (GCM).
I am working on one solution where changes done on one client must be propagated to other clients. And I just implemented a proof of concept implementation (server & client) and it works like a charm.
Basically, each client sends delta changes to the server. E.g. resource id ABCD1234 has changed from value 100 to 99.
Server validates these delta changes against its database and either approves the change (client is in sync) and updates its database or rejects the change (client is out of sync).
If the change is approved by the server, server then notifies other clients (excluding the one who sent the delta change) via GCM and sends multicast message carrying the same delta change. Clients process this message and updates their database.
Cool thing is that these changes are propagated almost instantaneously!!! if those devices are online. And I do not need to implement any polling mechanism on those clients.
Keep in mind that if a device is offline too long and there is more than 100 messages waiting in GCM queue for delivery, GCM will discard those message and will send a special message when the devices gets back online. In that case the client must do a full sync with server.
Check also this tutorial to get started with CGM client implementation.
this answers developers who are using the Xamarin framework (see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40156342/sync-online-offline-data)
A very simple way to achieve this with the xamarin framework is to use the Azure’s Offline Data Sync as it allows to push and pull data from the server on demand. Read operations are done locally, and write operations are pushed on demand; If the network connection breaks, the write operations are queued until the connection is restored, then executed.
The implementation is rather simple:
1) create a Mobile app in azure portal (you can try it for free here https://tryappservice.azure.com/)
2) connect your client to the mobile app.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/app-service-mobile-xamarin-forms-get-started/
3) the code to setup your local repository:
const string path = "localrepository.db";
//Create our azure mobile app client
this.MobileService = new MobileServiceClient("the api address as setup on Mobile app services in azure");
//setup our local sqlite store and initialize a table
var repository = new MobileServiceSQLiteStore(path);
// initialize a Foo table
store.DefineTable<Foo>();
// init repository synchronisation
await this.MobileService.SyncContext.InitializeAsync(repository);
var fooTable = this.MobileService.GetSyncTable<Foo>();
4) then to push and pull your data to ensure we have the latest changes:
await this.MobileService.SyncContext.PushAsync();
await this.saleItemsTable.PullAsync("allFoos", fooTable.CreateQuery());
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/app-service-mobile-xamarin-forms-get-started-offline-data/
I suggest you also take a look at Symmetricds. it is a SQLite replication library available to android systems. you can use it to synchronize your client and server database, I also suggest to have separate databases on server for each client. Trying to hold the data of all users in one mysql database is not always the best idea. Specially if the user data is going to grow fast.
Lets call it the CUDR Sync problem (I don't like CRUD - because Create/Update/Delete are writes and should be paired together)
The problem may also be looked at from write-offliine-first or write-online-first perspective. The write-offline-approach has a problem with unique identifier conflict, and also multiple network calls for same transaction increasing risk (or cost)...
I personally find write-online-first approach easier to manage (so it will be the single source of truth - from where everything else is synced). The write-online-approach will require not letting users write offline first - they will write offline by getting ok response form online write.
He may read offline first and as soon as network is available get the data from online and update the local database and then update the ui....
One way to avoid the unique identifier conflict would be to use a combination of unique user id + table name or table id + row id (generated by sqlite)... and then use the synced boolean flag column with it.. but still the registration has to be done online first to get the unique id on which all other ids will be generated... here the issue will also be if clocks are not synced - which someone mentioned above...
I've seen some posts on here regarding similar ideas to this, but to be specific I thought I should point out my requirement exactly.
I have a database driven site, and the client wants a replica of it for users from the USA. They want most of the site to be the same, except some of data, which they want to be different for US visitors.
The site runs on a php/MySQL database content management system I have written. I think we are going to approach the 'USA' version like this...
Place a clone of the whole site in a folder called /us (no surprises there)
Duplicate all the tables, but precede the names with us_
I'm thinking, of adding a field to the original sites tables called 'replicate' for example, and then every 15 mins or so, run a script to copy all the records from the original table to the us_ tables where the replicate field is marked yes
On the US version of the content management system, all records that are copied from the UK site are somehow locked so only records marked no at the original site can differ on the UK site.
Does this sound like I'm heading along the right lines ?
Why not make a new database for ONLY the tables/rows that are for US visitors only.
make a php array or something that says what table should be called from what database.
Seems like less effort to me.
Did you check the MySQL manual for topics about replication?
I am building a web-based ERP application for the retail industry using PHP and MySQL. I am going to have different local databases and one on the server(same structure). What I plan to do is run this app in localhost in different stores and at the end of the day update the database on the server from different localhosts in different stores.
Remember, I would like to update the database on the server based on the sequence queries run in different databases.
Can anyone please help me with this?
Thank you.
Perhaps link to your main database from the localhost sites to begin with? No need to update at the end of the day, every change that's made to the database is simply made to the database with no "middle men", so to speak. If you need the local databases separate, run the queries on both at once?
Note: I'm unfamiliar with how an ERP application works, so forgive me if I'm way off base here.
You may have to log every insert/update/delete sql requests in a daily file with a timestamp of your request on local databases.
Example :
2012-03-13 09:15:00 INSERT INTO...
2012-03-13 09:15:02 UPDATE MYTABLE SET...
2012-03-13 09:15:02 DELETE FROM...
...
Then send your log files daily on main server, merge all files, sort them to keep execution order and read new file to execute request on main database.
However, it's a curious way to do thing on ERP application. A product stock information can't be merged, it's a common information, be careful with this kind of data.
You can't use autoincrement with this process, this will cause duplicate key on some request or update requests on bad records.
I would like to create an interface for manipulating invoices in a transaction-like manner.
The database consists of an invoices table, which holds billing information, and an invoice_lines table, which holds line items for the invoices. The website is a set of scripts which allow the addition, modification, and removal of invoices and their corresponding lines.
The problem I have is this, I would like the ACID properties of the database to be reflected in the web application.
Atomic: When the user hits save, either the entire invoice is modified or the entire invoice is not changed at all.
Consistent: The application code already ensures consistency, lines cannot be added to non-existent invoices. Invoice IDs cannot be duplicated.
Isolated: If a user is in the middle of a set of changes to an invoice, I would like to hide those changes from other users until the user clicks save.
Durable: If the web site dies, the data should be safe. This already works.
If I were writing a desktop application, it would maintain a connection to the MySQL database at all times, allowing me to simply use the BEGIN TRANSACTION and COMMIT at the beginning and end of the edit.
From what I understand you cannot BEGIN TRANSACTION on one PHP page and COMMIT on a different page because the connection is closed between pages.
Is there a way to make this possible without extensions? From what I have found, only SQL Relay does this (but it is an extension).
you don't want to have long running transactions, because that'll limit concurrency. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_pattern
The translation on the web for this type of processing is the use of session data or data stored in the page itself. Typically what is done is that after each web page is completed the data is stored in the session (or in the page itself) and at the point in which all of the pages have been completed (via data entry) and a "Process" (or "Save") button is hit, the data is converted into the database form and saved - even with the relational aspect of data like you mentioned. There are many ways to do this but I would say that most developers have an architecture similar to what I mentioned (using session data or state within the page) to satisfy what you are talking about.
You'll get much advice here on different architectures but I can say that the Zend Framework (http://framework.zend.com) and the use of Doctrine (http://www.doctrine-project.org/) make this fairy easy since Zend provides much of the MVC architecture and session management and Doctrine provides the basic CRUD (create, retrieve, update, delete) you are looking for - plus all of the other aspects (uniqueness, commit, rollback, etc). Keeping the connection open to mysql may cause timeouts and lack of available connections.
Database transactions aren't really intended for this purpose - if you did use them, you'd probably run into other problems.
But also you can't use them as each page request uses its own connection (potentially) so cannot share a transaction with any others.
Keep the modifications to the invoice somewhere else while the user is editing them, then apply them when she hits save; you can do this final apply step in a transaction (albeit quite a short-lived one).
Long-lived transactions are usually bad.
The solution is not to open the transaction during the GET phase. Do all aspects of the transaction—BEGIN TRANSACTION, processing, and COMMIT—all during the POST triggered by the "save" button.
Persistent connections may help you:
http://php.net/manual/en/features.persistent-connections.php
Another is that when using
transactions, a transaction block will
also carry over to the next script
which uses that connection if script
execution ends before the transaction
block does.
But I recommend you to find another approach to the problem.
For example: create a cache table.
When you need to "commit", transfer the records from the cache table to the "real" tables.
Altough there are some good answers, I think that found some good responses to your question, that I was stuck with also. I think the best approach is using a framework like Doctrine (O/R mapping) that has this kind of approach somehow implemented. Here you have a link to what I'm talking about.