My question is concerning the inheritance mechanisms in object oriented PHP. If I want a class variable to be initialized in a super class in its constructor and all children classes to make use of initialized variable, I can't do this in the constructor of the superclass, since the superclasses constructor is not implicitly called by the children classes constructor, as in Java. If I have to manually call the super classes constructor from every children constructor, I do not have any benefit from simply doing the initialization in every children classes constructor.
How can I solve this problem? Any ideas?
class superclass {
protected $a;
function __construct() {
$this->a = new Foo();
}
}
class childrenclass1 extends superclass {
function __construct() {
do_something;
}
function childrenfunction() {
$this->a->method(); // not initalized;
}
}
Like Java, the superclass constructor is only called automatically when the child classes don't implement their own constructor. Alternatively, the initial property values can be declared as part of the class definition if they're a constant expression.
So, basically, your choices are:
Initialize the variable with a non-dynamic value in the parent class:
protected $var = 123;
Use parent::__construct() in all child classes that implement their own constructor. This is still better than initializing those properties in each child class, because using the parent's constructor doesn't duplicate code.
If the inheritance depth is 2 (i.e. only parent and child) you could drop the child constructor and define an initialization method:
class Parent
{
public function __construct()
{
...
$this->initialize();
}
protected function initialize() {}
}
class Child extends Parent
{
protected final function initialize()
{
...
}
}
The benefit to not doing the initialization in every child class constructor is that the logic of what to initialize it to can be kept in a single place - in the parent constructor. Calling the parent constructor from every child constructor can be tedious, but at least it's not duplicating the logic.
Your other option is to make the variable private, and use a method to access it from the child classes. The method can initialize it if needed, and then return the value.
class superclass {
private $a;
protected function getA() {
if (!($this->a instanceof Foo)) {
$this->a = new Foo();
}
return $this->a;
}
}
class childrenclass1 extends superclass {
public function childrenfunction() {
$this->getA()->method();
}
}
...don't forget to access your variable or method using $this. You can't leave that out in PHP like you can in Java.
It's a good practice to call parent constructor because it can initialize some variables or do other usefull things. But if you don't want to write in any child constructor parent::__construct() you can avoid write child constructor and move everything to a special method init. It will look like as:
class A {
public function __construct() {
do smt
}
}
class B extends A {
public function init() {
do smt
}
}
$b = new B();
$b->init();
Related
See the following example (PHP)
class Parent
{
protected $_property;
protected $_anotherP;
public function __construct($var)
{
$this->_property = $var;
$this->someMethod(); #Sets $_anotherP
}
protected function someMethod()
...
}
class Child extends Parent
{
protected $parent;
public function __construct($parent)
{
$this->parent = $parent;
}
private function myMethod()
{
return $this->parent->_anotherP; #Note this line
}
}
I am new to OOP and am a bit ignorant.
Here to access the parents property I am using an instance of that class, which seems wrong :S (no need of being i child then). Is there an easy way, so that i can sync the parent properties with the child properties and can directly access $this->anotherP without having to use $this->parent->anotherP ?
As your Child class is extending your Parent class, every properties and methods that are either public or protected in the Parent class will be seen by the Child class as if they were defined in the Child class -- and the other way arround.
When the Child class extends the Parent class, it can be seen as "Child is a Parent" -- which means the Child has the properties of the Parent, unless it redefines those another way.
(BTW, note that "parent" is a reserved keyword, in PHP -- which means you can't name a class with that name)
Here's a quick example of a "parent" class :
class MyParent {
protected $data;
public function __construct() {
$this->someMethodInTheParentClass();
}
protected function someMethodInTheParentClass() {
$this->data = 123456;
}
}
And it's "child" class :
class Child extends MyParent {
public function __construct() {
parent::__construct();
}
public function getData() {
return $this->data; // will return the $data property
// that's defined in the MyParent class
}
}
That can be used this way :
$a = new Child();
var_dump($a->getData());
And you'll get as output :
int 123456
Which means the $data property, defined in the MyParent class, and initialized in a method of that same MyParent class, is accessible by the Child class as if it were its own.
To make things simple : as the Child "is a" MyParent, it doesn't need to keep a pointer to... itself ;-)
This may save you a few hours of searching around.
Remember: Your Child class only inherits the properties DEFINED in the Parent class... So if you instantiate an object using Parent class and then populate it with data, then this data will NOT be available in your child class...
It's super obvious of course, but I'm guessing others may run into the same issue.
A super simple solution is not to extend anything, simply pass the $object of your parent class into your child class through a constructor. This way you have access to all the properties and methods of the object generated by parent class
Example
class child {
public parentObject;
public function __construct($parentObject) {
$this->parentObject = $parentObject;
}
}
If your $parentObject has a public property $name, then you can access it inside the child class with a function like:
public function print_name() {
echo $this->parentObject->name;
}
I have a code like following ---
class CartItem{
var $v;
function __construct(){
$this->f();
}
function f(){
echo 'In parent';
}
}
class m extends CartItem{
function f(){
echo 'In child';
}
}
new m();
Now when creating instance of m()... it doesn't have any constructor, so it is calling parent classes constructor. Now inside that a function f is called.
What I want is -
if class m() have defined function f()... is should call it instead of parent class's function f().
But anyway it is calling parent classes function, as it was called from parent's constructor, irrespective of child class/ context :(
You want to call in __construct() a method that is not defined in the class. This is a sign that the CartItem class is an abstract concept and you don't intend to instantiate it (because an instance of CartItem probably doesn't contain enough information or behaviour for your project).
An abstract concept is implemented using an abstract class that defines as much as it can and defines abstract methods to be implemented in the concrete classes that extend it. The method f() is such a method that cannot be defined in the abstract concept and has to be defined in each class that extend it:
abstract class CartItem
{
public function __construct()
{
$this->f();
}
abstract protected function f();
}
class m extends CartItem
{
protected function f()
{
// Implement behaviour specific to this class
}
}
This is actually a really interesting question.
so, as I understand it, you're asking (if this isnt right please say):
can you call a function of a class that's extending a parent?
yes, you can... sort of, if the method in the child is static.
Take this example (Ive not used it in the constructor for simplicity of example, but it will work there too):
class ClassA {
public function testMeAsWell() {
return ClassB::testMe();
}
}
class ClassB extends ClassA {
static function testMe() {
return 'do something';
}
}
$child = new ClassB();
echo $child->testMe();
// outputs 'do something'
$parent = new ClassA();
echo $parent->testMeAsWell();
// also outputs 'do something'
the reason this works needs more research, but as a guess I would say that because PHP is compiled, it will know about both classes at run-time and therefore will be able to figure out what we wanted it to do.
So, further on, you want to use variables. Yes you can, but they would have to be static as well.
working example
i have two class:
class BaseClass
{
public function __construct()
{
$this->init();
}
private function init()
{
//dosomething
}
}
class Myclass extends BaseClass
{
public function __construct()
{
}
}
now when i create:
$myclass = new Myclass;
function init is not running, somebody can help me?
That is because you are overriding your constructor within your child class. Just leave it out when you are not processing any tasks that differ from your parents constructor or call your parents constructor like that
class Myclass extends BaseClass
{
public function __construct()
{
parent::__construct(); // Call the parents constructor
// Do some stuff that explicitly belongs to the child class
}
}
Let's take a look on what the PHP docs say on it:
Note: Parent constructors are not called implicitly if the child class defines a constructor. In order to run a parent constructor, a call to parent::__construct() within the child constructor is required. If the child does not define a constructor then it may be inherited from the parent class just like a normal class method (if it was not declared as private).
Further reading:
PHP Docs - Constructors and Destructors
Say I have class child() and class parent(). The parent has a constructor and a few other public methods, and the child is empty apart from a constructor.
How do I go about calling a parent's methods inside of the child's constructor, as in:
Class Parent {
public function __construct() {
// Do stuff (set up a db connection, for example)
}
public function run($someArgument) {
// Manipulation
return $modifiedArgument;
}
}
Class Child extends Parent {
public function __construct() {
// Access parent methods here?
}
}
Say I want to call parents run() method, do I have to call a new instance of the parent inside the child constructor? Like so...
$var = new Parent();
$var->run($someArgument);
If so, what is the point of extends from a class definition POV? I can call a new instance of another class with the new keyword whether it extends the 'child' or not.
My (likely) wrong understanding was that by using extends you can link classes and methods from a parent can be inherited into the child. Is that only outside the class definition? Does using extend offer no efficiencies inside the class definition?
Because referring to the parent's run() method with the this keyword certainly doesn't work...
Use parent as predefined reference: parent::run(). This will ensure you call parent method. The same way you could call first parent constructor first or after child one - parent::__construct().
Class Child extends Parent {
public function __construct() {
parent::__construct();
// Access parent methods here?
$some_arg = NULL; // init from constructor argument or somewhere else
parent::run($some_arg); // explicitly call parent method
// $this->run($some_arg); // implicitly will call parent if no child override
}
}
If you dont have an implementation in child you could call $this->run($args), where it will again call parent run method.
To extend Rolice's answer
function a() {
echo 'I exist everywhere';
}
class A {
protected $a
function a() {
$this->a = 'I have been called';
}
function out() {
echo $this->a;
a();
}
}
class B extends A {
function __construct() {
parent::a();// original method
$this->a(); // overridden method
a();
}
function a() {
$this->a = $this->a ? 'I have been overwritten' : 'first call';
}
}
Study these to understand the difference
See the following example (PHP)
class Parent
{
protected $_property;
protected $_anotherP;
public function __construct($var)
{
$this->_property = $var;
$this->someMethod(); #Sets $_anotherP
}
protected function someMethod()
...
}
class Child extends Parent
{
protected $parent;
public function __construct($parent)
{
$this->parent = $parent;
}
private function myMethod()
{
return $this->parent->_anotherP; #Note this line
}
}
I am new to OOP and am a bit ignorant.
Here to access the parents property I am using an instance of that class, which seems wrong :S (no need of being i child then). Is there an easy way, so that i can sync the parent properties with the child properties and can directly access $this->anotherP without having to use $this->parent->anotherP ?
As your Child class is extending your Parent class, every properties and methods that are either public or protected in the Parent class will be seen by the Child class as if they were defined in the Child class -- and the other way arround.
When the Child class extends the Parent class, it can be seen as "Child is a Parent" -- which means the Child has the properties of the Parent, unless it redefines those another way.
(BTW, note that "parent" is a reserved keyword, in PHP -- which means you can't name a class with that name)
Here's a quick example of a "parent" class :
class MyParent {
protected $data;
public function __construct() {
$this->someMethodInTheParentClass();
}
protected function someMethodInTheParentClass() {
$this->data = 123456;
}
}
And it's "child" class :
class Child extends MyParent {
public function __construct() {
parent::__construct();
}
public function getData() {
return $this->data; // will return the $data property
// that's defined in the MyParent class
}
}
That can be used this way :
$a = new Child();
var_dump($a->getData());
And you'll get as output :
int 123456
Which means the $data property, defined in the MyParent class, and initialized in a method of that same MyParent class, is accessible by the Child class as if it were its own.
To make things simple : as the Child "is a" MyParent, it doesn't need to keep a pointer to... itself ;-)
This may save you a few hours of searching around.
Remember: Your Child class only inherits the properties DEFINED in the Parent class... So if you instantiate an object using Parent class and then populate it with data, then this data will NOT be available in your child class...
It's super obvious of course, but I'm guessing others may run into the same issue.
A super simple solution is not to extend anything, simply pass the $object of your parent class into your child class through a constructor. This way you have access to all the properties and methods of the object generated by parent class
Example
class child {
public parentObject;
public function __construct($parentObject) {
$this->parentObject = $parentObject;
}
}
If your $parentObject has a public property $name, then you can access it inside the child class with a function like:
public function print_name() {
echo $this->parentObject->name;
}