Doing a proper Join with SQL - php

Suppose I have two tables, one with list of spells and another with a grimory, the list of spells that a user has selected for learn or already learned.
mysql> SHOW COLUMNS FROM Grimory;
+--------------+------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+--------------+------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| personage_id | int(11) | YES | MUL | NULL | |
| spell_id | int(11) | YES | MUL | NULL | |
| isLearned | tinyint(1) | NO | | NULL | |
| isSelected | tinyint(1) | NO | | NULL | |
+--------------+------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> SHOW COLUMNS FROM Spell;
+-----------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+-----------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| name | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | |
| description | longtext | NO | | NULL | |
| chatDescription | longtext | NO | | NULL | |
| level | int(11) | NO | | NULL | |
| isActive | tinyint(1) | NO | | NULL | |
| category_id | int(11) | YES | MUL | NULL | |
| createdAt | datetime | YES | | NULL | |
+-----------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
8 rows in set (0.00 sec)
The problem.
I want to display a list with ALL spells by category_id, BUT for every row I want to show if that spell is learned or selected by current user (personage_id).
Can you help me to write a proper query?
How this works:
With php I generate: List of spells | checkbox isSelected | checkBox isStudied
When I click on isSelected checkbox, a record in grimory will be added with current user and spell.

Updated
SELECT a.*, IFNULL(b.isLearned,0) as isLearned,
IFNULL(b.isSelected,0) as isSelected
FROM Spell a
LEFT JOIN Grimory b(ON b.spell_id =a.id
AND b.personage_id =:current_user_id)
WHERE a.category_id = :current_category_id

SELECT * FROM Spell
INNER JOIN Grimory
ON Spell.id = Grimory.spell_id
WHERE (Grimory.isLearned = 1 OR Grimory.isSelected = 1)
AND Spell.category_id = 'YOUR CAT ID IS HERE'

Related

What is the best way to update a one table from another in SQL?

I have 2 tables the first one is the product-page visited
+------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| idproduct | varchar(128) | YES | | NULL | |
| logdate | date | YES | | NULL | |
| idmagasin | int(20) | YES | | NULL | |
| idenseigne | int(20) | YES | | NULL | |
| commanded | int(2) | YES | | 0 | |
+------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
And the second one is the product commanded
+-------------+--------------+------+-----+-------------------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+-------------+--------------+------+-----+-------------------+----------------+
| id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| idproduct | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | |
| idenseigne | int(11) | NO | | NULL | |
| idmagasin | int(11) | NO | | NULL | |
| ingredients | tinytext | YES | | NULL | |
| date | timestamp | NO | | CURRENT_TIMESTAMP | |
+-------------+--------------+------+-----+-------------------+----------------+
How can i update the column commanded in product_visited , if product_visited.idproduct = product_commanded.idproduct and product_visited.logdate = product_commanded.date
i'm confused to use inner join or exists
I want to update product_visited.commanded = 1 when the value of logdate and idproduct exists in product_commanded, it will mean the product visited is commanded too
I believe this is what you are looking for:
Update product_visited pv
set commanded = 1
Where exists (Select 1
from product_commanded pc
where pv.idproduct = pc.idproduct and pv.logdate = pc.date
);
Ok, I've made guesses with the join fields but you're after something like this;
UPDATE pv
SET pv.Commanded = 1
FROM Product_Visited pv
JOIN Product_Commanded pc
ON pv.logdate = pc.date
AND pv.idproduct = pc.id
The inner join means that you're only going to update records in Product_Visited where there are matching rows in Product_Commanded based on the join predicates you give it.
Note: this is a SQL Server answer. May or may not work in MySQL
Sounds like you want to update commanded whenever a record exists for same product in commanded table?
in any database:
Update product_visited set commanded = 1
Where exists(Select * from product_commanded
where product_id = product_visited.Product_id)

Eloquent IF clause - always returns true

I am using Entrust's default table structure:
permissions table:
+--------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+--------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(10) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| name | varchar(255) | NO | UNI | NULL | |
| display_name | varchar(255) | YES | | NULL | |
| description | varchar(255) | YES | | NULL | |
| created_at | timestamp | NO | | NULL | |
| updated_at | timestamp | NO | | NULL | |
+--------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
permission_role table:
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| permission_id | int(10) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | |
| role_id | int(10) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
roles table:
+--------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+--------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(10) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| name | varchar(255) | NO | UNI | NULL | |
| display_name | varchar(255) | YES | | NULL | |
| description | varchar(255) | YES | | NULL | |
| created_at | timestamp | NO | | NULL | |
| updated_at | timestamp | NO | | NULL | |
+--------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
Now, given a role_id I'd like to get select the following from this database:
permissions.id
permissions.display_name
whether the permission_role table contains an entry with the permission_id and the given role_id
The last one turned out to be a bit tricky in Eloquent.
This SQL query accomplishes exactly what I need (ID is obviously replaced by a valid role ID):
SELECT p.id, p.display_name, IF(pr.role_id = ID, 1, 0) AS has_role
FROM permissions p
LEFT OUTER JOIN permission_role pr ON p.id = pr.permission_id;
Example output:
+----+--------------+----------+
| id | display_name | has_role |
+----+--------------+----------+
| 1 | Edit users | 1 |
| 2 | View users | 0 |
| 3 | Delete users | 0 |
+----+--------------+----------+
Can anyone help me out here, on how to do this using Eloquent?
I've tried this, but it always returns 1 (true) in the third column, unlike the SQL query (as seen above).
$result = DB::table('permissions')
->leftJoin('permission_role', 'permission_role.permission_id', '=', 'permission_role.role_id')
->select(DB::raw('permissions.id, permissions.display_name, IF(permission_role.role_id = ID, 1, 0) AS has_role'))
->get();
Ideally, I'd like to do this without using DB::raw, although it is completely fine if that is what it takes.
Thanks in advance for any help!
Structurally, the Query Builder query you've shown looks fine.
What does not look fine is the left join. Shouldn't this:
->leftJoin('permission_role', 'permission_role.permission_id', '=', 'permission_role.role_id')
be this:
->leftJoin('permission_role', 'permission_role.permission_id', '=', 'permissions.id')
?

MySQL Query - Select all posts and count comments for each one

It's 3:30 AM in my country so I need to sleep but I can't without this:
I'm trying to get all posts (using Zend_Db) and count comments for each one.
Schema
blog_posts:
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(10) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| title | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | |
| content | text | NO | | NULL | |
| alias | varchar(100) | NO | | NULL | |
| user_id | int(11) | NO | | NULL | |
| created_date | datetime | NO | | NULL | |
| modified_date | datetime | YES | | NULL | |
| thumbnail | varchar(255) | YES | | NULL | |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
And here's blog_comments:
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(10) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| user_id | int(11) | NO | | NULL | |
| post_id | int(11) | NO | | NULL | |
| comment | text | NO | | NULL | |
| created_date | datetime | NO | | NULL | |
| modified_date | datetime | YES | | NULL | |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
Note: the blog_comments.post_id is linked with blog_posts.id.
I would like a resulting table like that:
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(10) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| title | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | |
| content | text | NO | | NULL | |
| alias | varchar(100) | NO | | NULL | |
| user_id | int(11) | NO | | NULL | |
| created_date | datetime | NO | | NULL | |
| modified_date | datetime | YES | | NULL | |
| thumbnail | varchar(255) | YES | | NULL | |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| TEMPOROARY COLUMN IN OBJECT ($post->comment) |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| comments | | | | | |
+---------------+------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
Now, here's the query I have for now:
SELECT `p`.*, `c`.*
FROM `blog_posts` `p`
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM `blog_comments` `c`
WHERE c.post_id = p.id
) ON `p`.`comments`;
But it give me an error:
Error Code: 1248. Every derived table must have its own alias
So if someone can help me, it would be very appreciated!
IMPORTANT NOTE
I'm using Zend_Db and Zend_Db_Select so I must be able to use the functions like joinLeft() or anything I need.
This is in my model for the select():
$select = $this->table->select();
if ($alias) {
$select->where('alias = ?', $alias);
return $this->table->fetchRow($select);
}
if ($withComments) {
// I WILL PLACE THE CODE HERE, EXEMPLE:
$select->joinLeft(...);
}
SELECT p.*, x.*
FROM blog_posts p
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT post_id, COUNT(*) as cc
FROM blog_comments
GROUP BY post_id
) x
ON x.post_id = p.id;

Joining content items with varying lengths of comments and tags :D

I have a content table that can have varying result lengths of comments and tags associated with each row. I am unsure of how to get all of this information for a piece of content in one swoop.
I can easily make a query to get the content info (id) and query each table for the comments and tags but that doesn't seem like it makes much sense as if there is a better way.
Any tips or suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
Thomas
My query SO far looks like:
SELECT c.*, GROUP_CONCAT(tagWords.tagWord SEPARATOR ', ') AS tags FROM platform.contents c
LEFT OUTER JOIN platform.contentTags ON contentTags.contentId = c.contentId
LEFT OUTER JOIN platform.tagWords ON contentTags.tagId = tagWords.tagId
WHERE c.contentType = 'album' LIMIT 10
GROUP_CONCAT is great and all but I need the fields from each table and as the tables will grow. :/
My table layouts:
mysql> explain contentComments;
+--------------+---------------------+------+-----+-------------------+-------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+--------------+---------------------+------+-----+-------------------+-------+
| contentId | bigint(19) unsigned | NO | MUL | NULL | |
| userId | bigint(19) unsigned | NO | | NULL | |
| message | varchar(255) | YES | | NULL | |
| stampCreated | timestamp | NO | | CURRENT_TIMESTAMP | |
+--------------+---------------------+------+-----+-------------------+-------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> explain contentTags;
+-----------+------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+-----------+------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| contentId | bigint(20) | NO | MUL | NULL | |
| tagId | bigint(20) | YES | | NULL | |
+-----------+------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> explain contents;
+------------------+-----------------------------------------+------+-----+-------------------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+------------------+-----------------------------------------+------+-----+-------------------+----------------+
| contentId | bigint(20) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| contentType | enum('video','album','blogpost','news') | NO | | NULL | |
| userId | bigint(19) unsigned | NO | MUL | NULL | |
| contentTitle | varchar(45) | YES | | NULL | |
| contentDesc | varchar(255) | YES | | NULL | |
+------------------+-----------------------------------------+------+-----+-------------------+----------------+
mysql> explain tagWords;
+---------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+---------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| tagId | bigint(19) unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| tagWord | varchar(45) | YES | | NULL | |
+---------+---------------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
That looks right to me, though I think you also need a group_concat for comments. It could be that your brain isnt comfortable with the idea of N to N relationships in a database, which would be strange considering it looks to me like you did it right :p

Force Specific Record to Top When Performing GROUP BY

I have the following MySQL query and tables from which I am querying:
SELECT
`Song`.`id`,
`Song`.`file_name`,
`User`.`first_name`,
`Vote`.`value`,
Sum(`Vote`.`value`) AS score
FROM `songs` AS `Song`
LEFT JOIN votes AS `Vote` ON (`Song`.`id`=`Vote`.`song_id`)
LEFT JOIN `users` AS `User` ON (`Song`.`user_id` = `User`.`id`)
GROUP BY `Vote`.`song_id`
LIMIT 20;
mysql> describe songs;
+-----------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+-----------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| file_name | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | |
| user_id | int(11) | NO | | NULL | |
| created | datetime | NO | | NULL | |
| modified | datetime | NO | | NULL | |
+-----------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> describe users;
+------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| username | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | |
| password | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | |
| first_name | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | |
| last_name | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | |
| is_admin | tinyint(1) | NO | | 0 | |
| created | datetime | NO | | NULL | |
| modified | datetime | NO | | NULL | |
+------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
mysql> describe votes;
+----------+----------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+----------+----------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
| id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
| value | int(11) | NO | | NULL | |
| song_id | int(11) | NO | | NULL | |
| user_id | int(11) | NO | | NULL | |
| created | datetime | NO | | NULL | |
| modified | datetime | NO | | NULL | |
+----------+----------+------+-----+---------+----------------+
This query functions just like I want except for one thing. The value returned in the field Vote.value is not from a row that is associated with the user who is logged into the application. I need the score value to be a sum of all the values no matter which user it is associated with, but the Vote.value field should belong to the logged in user (each user only gets one vote record per song).
My first thought is to somehow sort the table so that when the group by happens the vote record for the logged in user is at the top but I have no idea how to do a sort that forces an arbitrary value to the top. Any ideas would be very helpful.
and a third join
LEFT JOIN votes AS `VotePerUser` ON (`Song`.`id`=`Vote`.`song_id`
AND `Song`.`user_id`=`votes`.`user_id`)
and replace the Vote.value with VotePerUser.Value

Categories