I have been trying to set up an automated script to pull from a RETS server using PHP and I can not get the PHRets search to return anything. My query is below:
/* Search RETS server */
$search = $rets->SearchQuery(
'Property', // Resource
3, // Class
'(LastTransDate_f77=2013-01-01+)', // DMQL
array(
'Format' => 'COMPACT-DECODED',
'Select' => 'AREA_f16',
'Count' => 1,
'Limit' => 20,
)
);
EDIT: I got this working finally. The problem had nothing to do with my code, however, it was in the MLS board's faulty documentation. The documentation said that I could select certain fields for certain property types, but that wasn't the case. I had to consult a third party developer and get the list of fields/column names that he had used.
Consult the PHRETS documentation. You have the second parameter as an integer. It should be a string. Also the comma needs to be removed after the last element in the array.
/* Search RETS server */
$search = $rets->SearchQuery(
'Property',
'3',
'(LastTransDate_f77=2013-01-01+)',
array(
'Format' => 'COMPACT-DECODED',
'Select' => 'AREA_f16',
'Count' => 1,
'Limit' => 20
));
Related
I've many parameters(filters) for getting data from API so i've used POST method for sending parameters(filters) to API . Its working fine but I want to know its ok to use POST function for getting list from API ?
Reason for using POST instead GET :
If I've used GET function it will create problem for array data and also We need to pass some string data that may contain some special characters so in GET method need lot off manual error handling.
Our application under development phase so when new parameter need to add every time we need to change the URL on all our applications where we use this API.
$filter = (object) array(
'page_name' => '',
'page_category' => 0,
'page_gender' => 'N',
'page_country' => 0,
'page_company' => 0,
'page_language' => 0,
'page_order' => 'ASC',
'page_order_field' => 'dlang_firstname',
'page_currency' => 47,
'page_currency_unit' => 1,
'page_currency_iso' => 'GBP',
'page_current' => $page,
'page_size' => env('PAGE_SIZE', 10),
);
Above data I've passing to API.Is there any other way to send data ?
Using MailChimp API V3.0 to create a campaign.
I want to create a campaign that sends to users with a specific interest. It looks like this is possible in the docs, but I've tried every permutation I can think of. I can create the campaign fine as long as I leave out the segment_ops member. Does anyone have an example of PHP code that will do it?
It seems that interests are handled strangely since you don't include the interest-category when setting a users interests via the API. I'm not sure how this affects campaign creation.
I've gotten this to work, API definition can be found here https://us1.api.mailchimp.com/schema/3.0/Segments/Merge/InterestSegment.json
Interests have to be grouped under interest categories (called 'Groups' in some parts of the UI).
Here is the JSON for the segment_opts member of the recipients array:
"segment_opts": {
"match": "any",
"conditions": [{
"condition_type": "Interests",
"field": "interests-31f7aec0ec",
"op": "interestcontains",
"value": ["a9014571b8", "5e824ac953"]
}]
}
Here is the PHP array version with comments. The 'match' member refers to the the rules in the array of 'conditions'. The segment can match any, all, or none of the conditions. This example has only one condition, but others can be added as additional arrays in the 'conditions' array:
$segment_opts = array(
'match' => 'any', // or 'all' or 'none'
'conditions' => array (
array(
'condition_type' => 'Interests', // note capital I
'field' => 'interests-31f7aec0ec', // ID of interest category
// This ID is tricky: it is
// the string "interests-" +
// the ID of interest category
// that you get from MailChimp
// API (31f7aec0ec)
'op' => 'interestcontains', // or interestcontainsall, interestcontainsnone
'value' => array (
'a9014571b8', // ID of interest in that category
'5e824ac953' // ID of another interest in that category
)
)
)
);
You may also send to a Saved segment. The gotcha on this is that the segment_id has to be int. I was saving this value in a db as varchar, and it would not work unless cast to int.
(i am using use \DrewM\MailChimp\MailChimp;)
$segment_id = (int) $methodThatGetsMySegmentID;
$campaign = $MailChimp->post("campaigns", [
'type' => 'regular',
'recipients' => array(
'list_id' => 'abc123yourListID',
'segment_opts' => array(
'saved_segment_id' => $segment_id,
),
),
'settings' => array(
'subject_line' => 'A New Article was Posted',
'from_name' => 'From Name',
'reply_to' => 'info#example.com',
'title' => 'New Article Notification'
)
]);
I am trying to use the elasticsearch routing mapping to speed up some queries, but I am not getting the expected result set (not worried about the query performance just yet)
I am using Elastic to set up my mapping:
$index->create(array('number_of_shards' => 4,
'number_of_replicas' => 1,
'mappings'=>array("country"=>array("_routing"=>array("path"=>"countrycode"))),
'analysis' => array(
'analyzer' => array(
'indexAnalyzer' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'tokenizer' => 'nGram',
'filter' => array('shingle')
),
'searchAnalyzer' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'tokenizer' => 'nGram',
'filter' => array('shingle')
)
)
) ), true);
If I understand correctly, what should happen is that each result should now have a field called "countrycode" with the value of "country" in it.
The results of _mapping look like this:
{"postcode":
{"postcode":
{"properties":
{
"area1":{"type":"string"},
"area2":{"type":"string"},
"city":{"type":"string",
"include_in_all":true},
"country":{"type":"string"},
"country_iso":{"type":"string"},
"country_name":{"type":"string"},
"id":{"type":"string"},
"lat":{"type":"string"},
"lng":{"type":"string"},
"location":{"type":"geo_point"},
"region1":{"type":"string"},
"region2":{"type":"string"},
"region3":{"type":"string"},
"region4":{"type":"string"},
"state_abr":{"type":"string"},
"zip":{"type":"string","include_in_all":true}}},
"country":{
"_routing":{"path":"countrycode"},
"properties":{}
}
}
}
Once all the data is in the index if I run this command:
http://localhost:9200/postcode/_search?pretty=true&q=country:au
it responds with 15740 total items
what I was expecting is that if I run the query like this:
http://localhost:9200/postcode/_search?routing=au&pretty=true
Then I was expecting it to respond with 15740 results
instead it returns 120617 results, which includes results where country is != au
I did note that the number of shards in the results went from 4 to 1, so something is working.
I was expecting that in the result set there would be an item called "countrycode" (from the rounting mapping) which there isn't
So I thought at this point that my understand of routing was wrong. Perhaps all the routing does is tell it which shard to look in but not what to look for? in other words if other country codes happen to also land in that particular shard, the way those queries are written will just bring back all records in that shard?
So I tried the query again, this time adding some info to it.
http://localhost:9200/postcode/_search?routing=AU&pretty=true&q=country:AU
I thought by doing this it would force the query into giving me just the AU place names, but this time it gave me only 3936 results
So I Am not quite sure what I have done wrong, the examples I have read show the queries changing from needing a filter, to just using match_all{} which I would have thought would only being back ones matching the au country code.
Thanks for your help in getting this to work correctly.
Almost have this working, it now gives me the correct number of results in a single shard, however the create index is not working quite right, it ignores my number_of_shards setting, and possibly other ones too
$index = $client->getIndex($indexname);
$index->create(array('mappings'=>array("$indexname"=>array("_routing"=>array("required"=>true))),'number_of_shards' => 6,
'number_of_replicas' => 1,
'analysis' => array(
'analyzer' => array(
'indexAnalyzer' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'tokenizer' => 'nGram',
'filter' => array('shingle')
),
'searchAnalyzer' => array(
'type' => 'keyword',
'tokenizer' => 'nGram',
'filter' => array('shingle')
)
)
) ), true);
I can at least help you with more info on where to look:
http://localhost:9200/postcode/_search?routing=au&pretty=true
That query does indeed translate into "give me all documents on the shard where documents for country:AU should be sent."
Routing is just that, routing ... it doesn't filter your results for you.
Also i noticed you're mixing your "au"s and your "AU"s .. that might mix things up too.
You should try setting required on your routing element to true, to make sure that your documents are actually stored with routing information when being indexed.
Actually to make sure your documents are indexed with proper routing explicitly set the route to lowercase(countrycode) when indexing documents. See if that helps any.
For more information try reading this blog post:
http://www.elasticsearch.org/blog/customizing-your-document-routing/
Hope this helps :)
I'm trying to update a specific Lead from Sugar CRM. I do not know the ID of this lead, so I'm trying to retrieve the lead ID by calling get_entry_list using email addresses or names. I wanted to use a query and specify an email address or a name like so:
'query' => "first_name = \"Bob\"",
I even tried:
'query' => "first_name LIKE \"%Bob%\"",
and
'query' => "email1 LIKE \"%bob#abc.com\"",
But I just get this result:
Database failure. Please refer to sugarcrm.log for details.
...and there's nothing inside sugarcrm.log :(
Here's the full code:
$get_entry_list_parameters = array(
//session id
'session' => $session_id,
//The name of the module from which to retrieve records
'module_name' => 'Leads',
//The SQL WHERE clause without the word "where".
'query' => "first_name = \"Bob\"",
//The SQL ORDER BY clause without the phrase "order by".
'order_by' => "",
//The record offset from which to start.
'offset' => '0',
//Optional. A list of fields to include in the results.
'select_fields' => array(
'id',
'name',
'email1',
),
'link_name_to_fields_array' => array(
),
//The maximum number of results to return.
'max_results' => '10',
//To exclude deleted records
'deleted' => '0',
//If only records marked as favorites should be returned.
'Favorites' => false,
);
$get_entry_list_result = call('get_entry_list', $get_entry_list_parameters, $url);
echo '<pre>';
print_r($get_entry_list_result);
echo '</pre>';
EDIT: I'm using v4_1 REST API
Check this a running example > http://urdhva-tech.blogspot.in/2013/02/rest-api-example.html
Hope you find it useful.
Else by looking at the $get_entry_list_parameters array, it looks like it should work just fine.
Take a look in service/v4/SugarWebServiceUtilv4.php beginning in line 78. Set a breakpoint there or log the query ($where) that was generated. Maybe this helps you find out the reason.
The following query returns an array containing the proper ids, but null for all values.
If I remove the aggregation function (AVG()), it returns values (not the averaged ones of course), if I choose e.g. find('all') it returns the average, but not in the list format I want (I could work with that, but I want to try to do it with 'list' first).
$progress = $this->Trial->find('list', array(
'fields' => array(
'Trial.session_id',
'AVG(Trial.first_reaction_time_since_probe_shown) AS average_reaction_time'
),
'group' => 'Trial.session_id',
'conditions' => array(
'Trial.first_valid_response = Trial.probe_on_top',
'TrainingSession.user_id IS NOT NULL'
),
'contain' => array(
'TrainingSession' => array(
'conditions' => array(
'TrainingSession.user_id' => $this->Auth->user('id')
)
)
),
'recursive' => 1,
));
The generated SQL query returns exactly the result I want, when I send it to the DB via PhpMyAdmin.
SELECT
`Trial`.`session_id`,
AVG(`Trial`.`first_reaction_time_since_probe_shown`) AS average_reaction_time
FROM
`zwang`.`trials` AS `Trial`
LEFT JOIN
`zwang`.`training_sessions` AS `TrainingSession` ON (
`Trial`.`session_id` = `TrainingSession`.`id` AND
`TrainingSession`.`user_id` = 1
)
WHERE
`Trial`.`first_valid_response` = `Trial`.`probe_on_top`
GROUP BY
`Trial`.`session_id`
I've examined the source for find('list'). I think it's due to the "array path" for accessing the list getting screwed up when using functions in the query, but I couldn't fix it yet (or recognise my abuse of CakePHP logic).
Once I posted the question, Stackoverflow started relating the correct answers to me.
Apparently, it can't be done with 'list' without virtualFields.
I didn't expect that because it worked using the other find-types.
$this->Trial->virtualFields = array(
'average_reaction_time' => 'AVG(Trial.first_reaction_time_since_probe_shown)'
);
$progress = $this->Trial->find('list', array(
'fields' => array('Trial.session_id','average_reaction_time')
/* etc... */
));