A guy did a website for me and I'm trying to understand it. It's here:
http://www.brilliantzenaudio.com
Note that there's a logo image at the top left. I'm trying to understand where this came from. The relevant code seems to be partly in header.php and partly in app.css. From header.php,
<header class="banner" role="banner">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-12 col-lg-2">
<h1 class="logo"><?php bloginfo('name'); ?>">Brilliant Zen Audio</h1>
... stuff removed here, other items in header ...
</div>
</div>
</div>
</header>
And the app.css contains lines as follows. Looking at the php above, I see that there is a element of class "banner", so clearly there is css code addressing that (giving it a color, a position, border, and z-index). I also see that the header tag is also given the "role" of "banner". Does that serve any immediate purpose or is that for screen readers?
We can also see that the php contains h1 elements, and 'a' elements within 'h1' elements. CSS entries are there for those things. I'm not clear on what their purpose is. For one thing, the logo is an image. Why is it put in an h1 tag? I understand the need for the tag because the logo should be clickable (to get back to the home page). But what is put as the text of the link is some next (I'm not clear on how to parse the PHP there. What's clever is that the image gets put there because it's the background in an "h1.logo a" css entry.
I've added some general questions in comments below.
.banner { }
header.banner {
background:#603913;
position:relative; // question: what does this mean and how will it effect the position of things if I start moving or changing elements?
border-bottom:solid 1px #fff; // question: is this bottom border important for some reason?
z-index:9999; // what does this do?
}
h1.logo {
margin:0; // is there a need to define these on h1.logo?
padding:0;
}
h1.logo a {
display:block; // what is display:block and how does it affect appearance? How would it affect changes if I change the size or location of the logo?
text-indent:-9999px; // what is this?
background:url(../img/sm-logo.png) no-repeat 0 0;
width:101px; // what does it mean when you set the width and height of an <a>
height:103px;
margin:0 auto;
}
.banner { }
header.banner {
background:#603913;
position:relative; // This is set, so that the position:absolute of h1.logo a will work, and is also needed in order to make the z-index work.
border-bottom:solid 1px #fff; // Is responsible for the white line at the bottom of the header. It 's not important, but looks nice...
z-index:9999; // The z-index property specifies the stack order of an element. An element with greater stack order is always in front of an element with a lower stack order.
}
h1.logo {
margin:0; // Yes, because normally an h1 has a top and bottom margin defined, with this setting, you set it to 0.
padding:0;
}
h1.logo a {
display:block; // Normally an a element has inline properties. By setting this to block you can use width, margin and other properties which aren't available for inline elements
text-indent:-9999px; // The text-indent property specifies the indentation of the first line in a text-block.
background:url(../img/sm-logo.png) no-repeat 0 0;
width:101px; // Sets the width of this a, because it is a block element.
height:103px;
margin:0 auto;
}
Whilst this isn't necessarily an answer as Veelen's response hit the nail perfectly on what each element does, but below is a screenshot of Google Chrome's Web inspector (Or Firebug for Firefox). Hover over any DOM Element and it'll tell you everything about it, click the CSS rules and modify anything on the fly.
Experiment with it, see how things look & feel and it's constructed. It's how most Developers test & see how changes would look without having to Code/Re upload, and whatever you touch & change during Web Inspector, aren't saved =)
Related
I'm developing a Wordpress-theme with a theme-options page. In these options, a max-width for the website can be set, but I'm having some difficulties with the content-area.
When the max-width is filled in, the header- and footer-area get the max-width and a margin: O auto;.
The content-pages will be created using the Gutenberg Builder and I want to be able to add background-attributes to the blocks I use and display them full-width, but the content to fall into the max-width which was defined before.
HTML:
<header class="site-header">
<div class="header-wrapper"></div>
</header>
<main class="site-content">
<article class="post-10">
<header></header>
<div></div>
<footer></footer
</article>
</main>
<footer class="site-footer">
<div class="header-wrapper"></div>
</footer
CSS:
.header-wrapper,
.footer-wrapper,
article {
max-width: 1366px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
I get this:
I want my background to be full-width, but my content to have the same with as the content of my header and footer.
Is there a possibility to set the same max-width for the header-, content- and footer-section of the page, and make sure the background in the content-area is still full-width?
You can activate "wide alignment" and "full alignment" by adding add_theme_support( 'align-wide' );
to your functions.php file. The user then has the option to align images across the whole viewport width.
See also https://wordpress.org/gutenberg/handbook/designers-developers/developers/themes/theme-support/#opt-in-features
But that's for images, not for backgrounds.
For background areas/images you could try to create regular blocks (100% of the content area) which have margin settings like margin-left: calc(-50vw + 50%); margin-right: calc(-50vw + 50%); (same as in full-width Gutenberg blocks) and padding-left/padding-right calc(50vw - 50%);: That way the block would span the whole viewport width, but the content area would have the width of the content area (full width minus padding). You also would have to add the regular padding you want to use inside your content column to those values.
If I understand then your css should look like this:
.header-wrapper,
.footer-wrapper,
article header, article div, article footer {
max-width: 1366px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
article{
width: 100%;
background: blue;
}
but only if max-width is setted for those 3 divs inside article
Does content-block is represented by article ?
Update
I recreated codepen from https://css-tricks.com/full-width-containers-limited-width-parents/
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/eaJyqV
If this is possible you could put image with position: absolute and then put text with position: absolute on top of it but I guess your content-block doesnt work that way ;/
I'm trying to use window.loaction.replace() and discovered unwanted behavior.
The redirect works fine but it messes up my html structure.
It redirects to the wanted site but the top panel becomes a ghost. As far as I can tell the body structure behaves like it has a "negative margin the size of the panelheight". If I double the size of the panel with firebug it comes down.
The whole page looks like there is no panel at all after redirecting.
redirector: function(e){
window.location.replace(e);
}
The top panel is a nav element containing to ul's from which the right one is floated right. It is not fixed:
.panel{
display: block;
height: 42px;
position: relative;
z-index: 9998;
}
Even after manually reloading the page the bug doesn't disappear.
EDIT:
Same problem occurs if i redirect with PHP header: location...
The complete html,body moves up.
If I had to describe this bug in css it would look like:
html{
height:100%
position: absolute;
top:-40px;
bottom:40px;
}
Maybe it's useful for someone else:
The problem occurs if the calculated height of the content inside the body,html tags is higher than the body,html itself.
If the html,body have 100% height and inside the body are for example three elements:
Top Navigation Panel
Content Wrapper
Footer
And the calculated CSS height for these three element is higher than the body height it leads to this problem.
I don't know why it does only show up after a redirect but not if I navigate through links.
I have wordpress sidebar with:
<h3 class="widget-title">TITLE OF SIDEBAR</h3>
and I need show small icon before "TITLE OF SIDEBAR. Can I do with CSS?
Or I must manually add image into code? like:
<h3 class="widget-title"><img src="">TITLE OF SIDEBAR</h3>
Pseudo elements will do what you want. Using the :before pseudo element, your CSS would look like this:
h3.widget-title:before {
content: url('/path/to/image');
}
This will place an image before the text content of the <h3>, however this won't change the DOM at all which is important to note.
A good explanation of how pseudo elements work can be found here, on CSS Tricks.
If your image is 10px wide, you could try this:
.widget-title {
background: url(smallicon.png) left top no-repeat;
padding-left: 10px;
}
Keep your h3 tag without including img tag, and do the following:
h3.widget-title {
position: relative;
padding-left: <width of the icon image>;
}
h3.widget-title:before {
content: '';
width: <width value>;
height: <height value>;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
display: block;
background: url(<path of the icon image>) no-repeat;
}
.widget-title:before {
content: url(path/to/image.png);
}
You can find more information at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/content.
h3:before {
content: url('https://www.google.com/images/srpr/logo4w.png')
}
Sample http://jsfiddle.net/KCXVM/
Yes, you can do it in CSS.
Simply use the :before pseudo-selector, like this:
widget-title:before {
content:url('imagename.png');
}
Or, of course, use h3:before { ... } for it to apply to all h3 elements.
Here's a working example for you
Browser compatibility: This works in all common browsers, except IE7 or earlier.
Why not simply apply the image as a background?
.widget-title {
background: url(...) no-repeat 50% 0;
padding-left: 20px;
}
So, at first, I thought a <span> thing would work.
Then, I tried this, and it worked seamlessly:
h3:before{
content: url('your url');
}
You can add icon before each h3 heading in CSS by following these ways below (via OIW Blog):
- Use Glyphicons of Bootstrap
If you are using Bootstrap then you can use Glyphicons to add icons to the desired title or text.
Bootstrap contains a diverse set of icons, to pick up a suitable icon you can take a look at here: https://getbootstrap.com/docs/3.3/components/. Once choosing a desired icon, adding it to theme is a piece of cake. You just need to add the card after the location that you want your icon to be displayed
<span class="glyphicon glyphicon-ok"></span>
Notice that the icon I added is “ok” so its class shall be “glyphicon-ok”. Each icon (in the list I mentioned above) is compatible to a different class.
- Use icons of existing Cheatsheet of the currently used Font or third party
If your website don’t use Bootstrap or the current set of icons of Bootstrap doesn’t meet your need (despite containing a lot) (Glyphicons of bootstrap has displaying errors on IE10 of Window Phone OS). After that you can check what font of the website you are using is and find out if it has an icons Cheatsheet library or not. For example: Elusiveicons, Fontisto, Material Design… are some of the fonts that have icons Cheatsheet which are for immediate use.
If your currently used font of the website has Icons Cheatsheet then you can have a set of icons of the third party. Here I would like to introduce “Font Awesome Icons”. This is a good-looking and popular set of icons.
To use this set of cons, you need to add this code to the head section in your website:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://use.fontawesome.com/releases/v5.0.13/css/all.css" integrity="sha384-DNOHZ68U8hZfKXOrtjWvjxusGo9WQnrNx2sqG0tfsghAvtVlRW3tvkXWZh58N9jp" crossorigin="anonymous">
– After adding CSS, you can use this code to put in the HTML which shows icons (you can apply this method to the part you use Cheatsheet of the font as mentioned above. Some fonts have unique way of using)
<i class="fa fa-edit"></i>
– If you don’t want the code in the HTML, you can just use CSS. With CSS you need to find the Class or ID of the part that displays icon and after that use the below CSS code to display it. Here I display the EDIT icon of the third party “Font Awesome Icons” before (::before) the title, along with 2 properties of padding-right and font-style (you can also display it after the title by using after property):
span.last-updated-time::before {
font-family: "FontAwesome";
content: "\f044";
padding-right: 5px;
font-style: normal;
}
Notice: the code of content is hexadecimal code. You can find and replace it with the code of the currently used icon. With “Font Awesome Icons” you can find it here: https://fontawesome.com/cheatsheet
I have designed an html iframe where I want to use the word-wrap property, i.e., it should break long words onto the next line. But what happens instead is that for long words, it adds a horizontal scroll-bar rather than breaking the word onto the next line.
I tried hiding the scroll bar by using "overflow:hidden" property , but nothing happens.
I could use some help here.
Here's the html code for iframe:
<div id="main_frame" >
<iframe id="main_frame" src="homedept.php" name="iframe_a"></iframe>
</div>
The CSS is:
div#main_frame
{
float: left;
margin-top:198px;
margin-left:5px;
float:left;
position:relative;
width:100%;
height:900px;
z-index: 0;
word-wrap:break-word;
}
iframe#main_frame
{
float:left;
margin-left: 30px;
margin-right: 300px;
float:left;
border:none;
word-wrap:break-word;
width: 78%;
height:70%;
z-index: 1;
}
Thanks for the reply #tyriar, I have set the word-wrap property to the original page now. Still nothing happens.
<div id="display_posts">
<?php //php echoes some text here ?>
</div>
The CSS code is:
#display_posts
{
word-wrap:break-word;
}
You defined same ID 2 times , but ID must be unique , you can not declare it twice.
So use class instead of using ID
Also iframe call other page and you defined word-wrap in original page so its not apply.
Try
word-break:break-word
or
word-break:break-all
And try using class instead of ID because ID should be unique.
You can't apply word-wrap to an iframe, it's a completely separate page and styles from your original page won't apply. You would need to change the styles on the page where the iframe points.
Also id attributes must be unique, you have set id="main_frame" on both an iframe and a div.
Update
If word-wrap:break-all is on the iframe then maybe the width of the page is introducing the scroll bar. Make sure that your elements scale down correctly with the page. If you load up the page in your iframe in your browser you should be able to reduce the window size without a horizontal scroll bar appearing. If one does then it's an issue with the minimum width of that page.
I have a widget that is comprised of quite a few divs. I then use javascript to bring the widget to life and do what it is supposed to do.
It is positioned on the page above the main content.
The client feels having all the widget html above the keyword rich content is bad for rankings, yet visually this is how we want the page set up.
What are some options here to keep the widget positioned as we want, yet not clutter up the top of the page as it is crawled?
current setup:
-javascript file is called in head
-widget html, which is several divs, text, images, etc.
-other page content divs
You could include the widget at the bottom of the page, then use css to position it at the top. Make sure your main content has a top-margin equivalent to the size of the widget. As mentioned in your comment, you'd also need to position the widget sufficiently far down the page to avoid the header content. This relies on your header and widget having specified heights. Your html would be something like this:
<body>
<div class="header">The header</div>
<div class="main-content">The main content</div>
<div class="widget">widget</div>
</body>
Then your css could be something like this:
.header, .main-content, .widget {
height: 40px;
}
.header {
background-color: red;
}
.main-content {
background-color: blue;
margin-top: 40px; /* height of widget */
}
.widget {
background-color: yellow;
position: absolute;
top: 40px; /* height of header */
}
You can see this in action here: http://jsfiddle.net/W3RzU/
As bardiir pointed out, putting the widget code in the correct place would be much simpler and would have minimal (if any) impact on seo.