Using thread in php, ununderstood behaviour - php

here is a simple example of what I am not understanding :
<?php
class classA {
private $z = 1;
public function __construct() {
$this->b = new classB;
$this->b->setRefonClassA($this);
$this->b->start();
}
function changeZ() {
echo "ChangeZ : z=" . $this->z . "\n";
$this->z = 666;
echo "ChangeZ : z=" . $this->z . "\n";
}
function showZ() {
echo "showZ : z=" . $this->z . "\n";
}
}
class classB extends Thread {
function setRefOnClassA($classA) {
$this->classA = $classA;
}
function run() {
$this->classA->changeZ();
$this->classA->showZ();
}
}
$test = new classA();
?>
The result are :
ChangeZ : z=1
ChangeZ : z=666
showZ : z=1
I was expecting that showZ=666. Why z=1 ?
I'm clearly missing something here.
Thanks in advance

Can you try extending classA from Stackable?
There is a similar problem:
pthread Thread objects reset their state

Read this: https://gist.github.com/krakjoe/6437782
You have two problems, first classA is not thread safe, if you don't descend from pthreads it is serialized when set as a member of classB. If classA does descend from pthreads, when you write it to classB you loose the real reference and pthreads will not allow you to access the same functionality - it thinks you are in another thread.
The key is, "You are responsible for the objects you create", this means, if you intend to share an object among threads, you must retain a direct reference to it in the scope that created the object.

Related

bind a callback to the beginning and end of a method [duplicate]

Class test{
function test1()
{
echo 'inside test1';
}
function test2()
{
echo 'test2';
}
function test3()
{
echo 'test3';
}
}
$obj = new test;
$obj->test2();//prints test2
$obj->test3();//prints test3
Now my question is,
How can i call another function before any called function execution?
In above case, how can i auto call 'test1' function for every another function call,
so that i can get the output as,
test1
test2
test1
test3
currently i am getting output as
test2
test3
I cannot call 'test1' function in
every function definition as there may
be many functions. I need a way to
auto call a function before calling
any function of a class.
Any alternative way would also be do.
Your best bet is the magic method __call, see below for example:
<?php
class test {
function __construct(){}
private function test1(){
echo "In test1", PHP_EOL;
}
private function test2(){
echo "test2", PHP_EOL;
}
protected function test3(){
return "test3" . PHP_EOL;
}
public function __call($method,$arguments) {
if(method_exists($this, $method)) {
$this->test1();
return call_user_func_array(array($this,$method),$arguments);
}
}
}
$a = new test;
$a->test2();
echo $a->test3();
/*
* Output:
* In test1
* test2
* In test1
* test3
*/
Please notice that test2 and test3 are not visible in the context where they are called due to protected and private. If the methods are public the above example will fail.
test1 does not have to be declared private.
ideone.com example can be found here
Updated: Add link to ideone, add example with return value.
All previous attempts are basically flawed because of http://ocramius.github.io/presentations/proxy-pattern-in-php/#/71
Here's the simple example, taken from my slides:
class BankAccount { /* ... */ }
And here's our "poor" interceptor logic:
class PoorProxy {
public function __construct($wrapped) {
$this->wrapped = $wrapped;
}
public function __call($method, $args) {
return call_user_func_array(
$this->wrapped,
$args
);
}
}
Now if we have the following method to be called:
function pay(BankAccount $account) { /* ... */ }
Then this won't work:
$account = new PoorProxy(new BankAccount());
pay($account); // KABOOM!
This applies to all solutions that suggest implementing a "proxy".
Solutions suggesting explicit usage of other methods that then call your internal API are flawed, because they force you to change your public API to change an internal behavior, and they reduce type safety.
The solution provided by Kristoffer doesn't account for public methods, which is also a problem, as you can't rewrite your API to make it all private or protected.
Here is a solution that does solve this problem partially:
class BankAccountProxy extends BankAccount {
public function __construct($wrapped) {
$this->wrapped = $wrapped;
}
public function doThings() { // inherited public method
$this->doOtherThingsOnMethodCall();
return $this->wrapped->doThings();
}
private function doOtherThingsOnMethodCall() { /**/ }
}
Here is how you use it:
$account = new BankAccountProxy(new BankAccount());
pay($account); // WORKS!
This is a type-safe, clean solution, but it involves a lot of coding, so please take it only as an example.
Writing this boilerplate code is NOT fun, so you may want to use different approaches.
To give you an idea of how complicated this category of problems is, I can just tell you that I wrote an entire library to solve them, and some smarter, wiser, older people even went and invented an entirely different paradigm, called "Aspect Oriented Programming" (AOP).
Therefore I suggest you to look into these 3 solutions that I think may be able to solve your problem in a much cleaner way:
Use ProxyManager's "access interceptor", which is basically a proxy type that allows you to run a closure when other methods are called (example). Here is an example on how to proxy ALL calls to an $object's public API:
use ProxyManager\Factory\AccessInterceptorValueHolderFactory;
function build_wrapper($object, callable $callOnMethod) {
return (new AccessInterceptorValueHolderFactory)
->createProxy(
$object,
array_map(
function () use ($callOnMethod) {
return $callOnMethod;
},
(new ReflectionClass($object))
->getMethods(ReflectionMethod::IS_PUBLIC)
)
);
}
then just use build_wrapper as you like.
Use GO-AOP-PHP, which is an actual AOP library, completely written in PHP, but will apply this sort of logic to ALL instances of classes for which you define point cuts. This may or may not be what you want, and if your $callOnMethod should be applied only for particular instances, then AOP is not what you are looking for.
Use the PHP AOP Extension, which I don't believe to be a good solution, mainly because GO-AOP-PHP solves this problem in a more elegant/debuggable way, and because extensions in PHP are inherently a mess (that is to be attributed to PHP internals, not to the extension developers).
Additionally, by using an extension, you are making your application as un-portable as possible (try convincing a sysadmin to install a compiled version of PHP, if you dare), and you can't use your app on cool new engines such as HHVM.
Maybe it is a little bit outdated but here come my 2 cents...
I don't think that giving access to private methods via __call() is a good idea. If you have a method that you really don't want to be called outside of your object you have no way to avoid it happening.
I think that one more elegant solution should be creating some kind of universal proxy/decorator and using __call() inside it. Let me show how:
class Proxy
{
private $proxifiedClass;
function __construct($proxifiedClass)
{
$this->proxifiedClass = $proxifiedClass;
}
public function __call($methodName, $arguments)
{
if (is_callable(
array($this->proxifiedClass, $methodName)))
{
doSomethingBeforeCall();
call_user_func(array($this->proxifiedClass, $methodName), $arguments);
doSomethingAfterCall();
}
else
{
$class = get_class($this->proxifiedClass);
throw new \BadMethodCallException("No callable method $methodName at $class class");
}
}
private function doSomethingBeforeCall()
{
echo 'Before call';
//code here
}
private function doSomethingAfterCall()
{
echo 'After call';
//code here
}
}
Now a simply test class:
class Test
{
public function methodOne()
{
echo 'Method one';
}
public function methodTwo()
{
echo 'Method two';
}
private function methodThree()
{
echo 'Method three';
}
}
And all you need to do now is:
$obj = new Proxy(new Test());
$obj->methodOne();
$obj->methodTwo();
$obj->methodThree(); // This will fail, methodThree is private
Advantages:
1)You just need one proxy class and it will work with all your objects.
2)You won't disrespect accessibility rules.
3)You don't need to change the proxified objects.
Disadvantage: You will lose the inferface/contract after wrapping the original object. If you use Type hinting with frequence maybe it is a problem.
Perhaps the best way so far is to create your own method caller and wrap around whatever you need before and after the method:
class MyClass {
public function callMethod()
{
$args = func_get_args();
if (count($args) == 0) {
echo __FUNCTION__ . ': No method specified!' . PHP_EOL . PHP_EOL;;
} else {
$method = array_shift($args); // first argument is the method name and we won't need to pass it further
if (method_exists($this, $method)) {
echo __FUNCTION__ . ': I will execute this line and then call ' . __CLASS__ . '->' . $method . '()' . PHP_EOL;
call_user_func_array([$this, $method], $args);
echo __FUNCTION__ . ": I'm done with " . __CLASS__ . '->' . $method . '() and now I execute this line ' . PHP_EOL . PHP_EOL;
} else
echo __FUNCTION__ . ': Method ' . __CLASS__ . '->' . $method . '() does not exist' . PHP_EOL . PHP_EOL;
}
}
public function functionAA()
{
echo __FUNCTION__ . ": I've been called" . PHP_EOL;
}
public function functionBB($a, $b, $c)
{
echo __FUNCTION__ . ": I've been called with these arguments (" . $a . ', ' . $b . ', ' . $c . ')' . PHP_EOL;
}
}
$myClass = new MyClass();
$myClass->callMethod('functionAA');
$myClass->callMethod('functionBB', 1, 2, 3);
$myClass->callMethod('functionCC');
$myClass->callMethod();
And here's the output:
callMethod: I will execute this line and then call MyClass->functionAA()
functionAA: I've been called
callMethod: I'm done with MyClass->functionAA() and now I execute this line
callMethod: I will execute this line and then call MyClass->functionBB()
functionBB: I've been called with these arguments (1, 2, 3)
callMethod: I'm done with MyClass->functionBB() and now I execute this line
callMethod: Method MyClass->functionCC() does not exist
callMethod: No method specified!
You can even go further and create a whitelist of methods but I leave it like this for the sake of a more simple example.
You will no longer be forced to make the methods private and use them via __call().
I'm assuming that there might be situations where you will want to call the methods without the wrapper or you would like your IDE to still autocomplete the methods which will most probably not happen if you declare the methods as private.
<?php
class test
{
public function __call($name, $arguments)
{
$this->test1(); // Call from here
return call_user_func_array(array($this, $name), $arguments);
}
// methods here...
}
?>
Try adding this method overriding in the class...
If you are really, really brave, you can make it with runkit extension. (http://www.php.net/manual/en/book.runkit.php). You can play with runkit_method_redefine (you can need Reflection also to retrieve method definition) or maybe combination runkit_method_rename (old function) / runkit_method_add (new function which wraps calls to your test1 function and an old function )
The only way to do this is using the magic __call. You need to make all methods private so they are not accessable from the outside. Then define the __call method to handle the method calls. In __call you then can execute whatever function you want before calling the function that was intentionally called.
Lets have a go at this one :
class test
{
function __construct()
{
}
private function test1()
{
echo "In test1";
}
private function test2()
{
echo "test2";
}
private function test3()
{
echo "test3";
}
function CallMethodsAfterOne($methods = array())
{
//Calls the private method internally
foreach($methods as $method => $arguments)
{
$this->test1();
$arguments = $arguments ? $arguments : array(); //Check
call_user_func_array(array($this,$method),$arguments);
}
}
}
$test = new test;
$test->CallMethodsAfterOne('test2','test3','test4' => array('first_param'));
Thats what I would do

Is it possible to use mixins in php

I came to know about mixins.So my doubt is, is it possible to use mixins in php?If yes then how?
Use Trait introduced in PHP 5.4
<?php
class Base {
public function sayHello() {
echo 'Hello ';
}
}
trait SayWorld {
public function sayHello() {
parent::sayHello();
echo 'World!';
}
}
class MyHelloWorld extends Base {
use SayWorld;
}
$o = new MyHelloWorld();
$o->sayHello();
?>
which prints Hello World!
http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.traits.php
This answer is obsolete as of PHP 5.4. See Jeanno's answer for how to use traits.
It really depends on what level of mixins you want from PHP. PHP handles single-inheritance, and abstract classes, which can get you most of the way.
Of course the best part of mixins is that they're interchangeable snippets added to whatever class needs them.
To get around the multiple inheritance issue, you could use include to pull in snippets of code. You'll likely have to dump in some boilerplate code to get it to work properly in some cases, but it would certainly help towards keeping your programs DRY.
Example:
class Foo
{
public function bar( $baz )
{
include('mixins/bar');
return $result;
}
}
class Fizz
{
public function bar( $baz )
{
include('mixins/bar');
return $result;
}
}
It's not as direct as being able to define a class as class Foo mixin Bar, but it should get you most of the way there. There are some drawbacks: you need to keep the same parameter names and return variable names, you'll need to pass other data that relies on context such as func_get_args_array or __FILE__.
Mixins for PHP (PHP does not implement Mixins natively, but this library will help)
First google result for "php5 mixin": http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/php-application-design-147/ruby-like-mixins-php5-332491.html
First google result for "php mixin": http://www.advogato.org/article/470.html
Short answer: yes, but not natively (yet, evidently, as #mchl notes). Check those out.
Longer answer: if you're using runkit, checkout runkit_method_copy(): "Copies a method from class to another."
I based mixins functionality on the blog entry found at jansch.nl.
class Node
{
protected $__decorator_lookup = array();
public function __construct($classes = array())
{
foreach($classes as $class)
if (class_exists($class))
{
$decorator = new $class($this);
$methods = get_class_methods($decorator);
if (is_array($methods))
foreach($methods as $method)
$this->__decorator_lookup[strtolower($method)] = $decorator;
}
else
trigger_error("Tried to inherit non-existant class", E_USER_ERROR);
}
public function __get($name)
{
switch($name)
{
default:
if ($this->__decorator_lookup[strtolower($name)])
return $this->__call($name);
}
}
public function __call($method, $args = array())
{
if(isset($this->__decorator_lookup[strtolower($method)]))
return call_user_func_array(array($this->__decorator_lookup[strtolower($method)], $method), $args);
else
trigger_error("Call to undefined method " . get_class($this) . "::$method()", E_USER_ERROR);
}
public function __clone()
{
$temp = $this->decorators;
$this->decorators = array();
foreach($temp as $decorator)
{
$new = clone($decorator);
$new->__self = $this;
$this->decorators[] = $new;
}
}
}
class Decorator
{
public $__self;
public function __construct($__self)
{
$this->__self = $__self;
}
public function &__get($key)
{
return $this->__self->$key;
}
public function __call($method, $arguments)
{
return call_user_func_array(array($this->__self, $method), $arguments);
}
public function __set($key, $value)
{
$this->__self->$key = $value;
}
}
class Pretty extends Decorator
{
public function A()
{
echo "a";
}
public function B()
{
$this->b = "b";
}
}
$a = new Node(array("Pretty"));
$a->A(); // outputs "a"
$a->B();
echo($a->b); // outputs "b"
EDIT:
As PHP clone is shallow, added __clone support.
Also, bear in mind that unset WON'T work (or at least I've not managed to make it work) within the mixin. So - doing something like unset($this->__self->someValue); won't unset the value on Node. Don't know why, as in theory it should work. Funny enough unset($this->__self->someValue); var_dump(isset($this->__self->someValue)); will produce correctly false, however accessing the value from Node scope (as Node->someValue) will still produce true. There's some strange voodoo there.

PHP get_called_class() alternative

I've got an Abstract PHP superclass, which contains code that needs to know which subclass its running under.
class Foo {
static function _get_class_name() {
return get_called_class();
//works in PHP 5.3.*, but not in PHP 5.2.*
}
static function other_code() {
//needs to know
echo self::_get_class_name();
}
}
class Bar extends Foo {
}
class FooBar extends Foo {
}
Bar::other_code(); // i need 'Bar'
FooBar::other_code(); // i need 'FooBar'
This would work if I called the function get_called_class() -- however, this code is going to be run in PHP version 5.2.*, so that function is not available.
There's some custom PHP implementations of get_called_class() out there, but they all rely on going thru the debug_backtrack(), parsing a file name & line number, and running a regex (as the coder is not aware that PHP 5.2 has reflection) to find the class name. This code needs to be able to be run with php, ie. not only from a .php file. (It needs to work from a php -a shell, or an eval() statement.)
Ideally, a solution would work without requiring any code to be added to the subclasses… The only potential solution I can see though is adding the following code to each subclass, which is obviously a disgusting hack:
class FooBar extends Foo {
static function _get_class_name() {
return 'FooBar';
}
}
EDIT: Wait, this doesn't even seem to work. It would've been my last resort. Can anybody think of something similar to this solution that'd get me the required functionality. Ie., I'm willing to accept a solution that requires me to add one function or variable to each subclass telling it what its class name is. Unfortunately, it seems that calling self::_get_class_name() from the superclass calls the parent class' implementation, even if the subclass has overridden it.
In reality it is often helpful to know the actual called (sub)class when executing a superclass method, and I disagree that there's anything wrong with wanting to solve this problem.
Example, my objects need to know the class name, but what they do with that information is always the same and could be extracted into a superclass method IF I was able to get the called class name. Even the PHP team thought this was useful enough to include in php 5.3.
The correct and un-preachy answer, as far as I can tell, is that prior to 5.3, you have to either do something heinous (e.g. backtrace,) or just include duplicate code in each of the subclasses.
Working solution:
function getCalledClass(){
$arr = array();
$arrTraces = debug_backtrace();
foreach ($arrTraces as $arrTrace){
if(!array_key_exists("class", $arrTrace)) continue;
if(count($arr)==0) $arr[] = $arrTrace['class'];
else if(get_parent_class($arrTrace['class'])==end($arr)) $arr[] = $arrTrace['class'];
}
return end($arr);
}
This is not possible.
The concept of "called class" was introduced in PHP 5.3. This information was not tracked in previous versions.
As an ugly work-around, you could possibly use debug_backtrace to look into the call stack, but it's not equivalent. For instance, in PHP 5.3, using ClassName::method() doesn't forward the static call; you have no way to tell this with debug_backtrace. Also, debug_backtrace is relatively slow.
The PHP/5.2 alternative to late static binding that keeps duplicate code to the minimum while avoiding weird hacks would be to create one-liners on child classes that pass the class name as argument:
abstract class Transaction{
public $id;
public function __construct($id){
$this->id = $id;
}
protected static function getInstanceHelper($class_name, $id){
return new $class_name($id);
}
}
class Payment extends Transaction{
public static function getInstance($id){
return parent::getInstanceHelper(__CLASS__, $id);
}
}
class Refund extends Transaction{
public static function getInstance($id){
return parent::getInstanceHelper(__CLASS__, $id);
}
}
var_dump( Payment::getInstance(1), Refund::getInstance(2) );
object(Payment)#1 (1) {
["id"]=>
int(1)
}
object(Refund)#2 (1) {
["id"]=>
int(2)
}
The solution is:
get_class($this);
However, I don't know if this sentence works in static functions. Give it a try and tell me your feedback.
This hack includes the heinous use of debug_backtrace... not pretty, but it does the job:
<?php
function callerName($functionName=null)
{
$btArray = debug_backtrace();
$btIndex = count($btArray) - 1;
while($btIndex > -1)
{
if(!isset($btArray[$btIndex]['file']))
{
$btIndex--;
if(isset($matches[1]))
{
if(class_exists($matches[1]))
{
return $matches[1];
}
else
{
continue;
}
}
else
{
continue;
}
}
else
{
$lines = file($btArray[$btIndex]['file']);
$callerLine = $lines[$btArray[$btIndex]['line']-1];
if(!isset($functionName))
{
preg_match('/([a-zA-Z\_]+)::/',
$callerLine,
$matches);
}
else
{
preg_match('/([a-zA-Z\_]+)::'.$functionName.'/',
$callerLine,
$matches);
}
$btIndex--;
if(isset($matches[1]))
{
if(class_exists($matches[1]))
{
return $matches[1];
}
else
{
continue;
}
}
else
{
continue;
}
}
}
return $matches[1];
}
I have asked a question like this before, because I wanted a parent to have a factory method that was something like this
public static function factory() {
return new __CLASS__;
}
But it always returned the parent class, not the inherited one.
I was told that it is not possible without late static binding. It was introduced in PHP 5.3. You can read the documentation.
This function does the same job but works with instances too:
if (!function_exists('get_called_class')) {
function get_called_class() {
$bt = debug_backtrace();
/*
echo '<br><br>';
echo '<pre>';
print_r($bt);
echo '</pre>';
*/
if (self::$fl == $bt[1]['file'] . $bt[1]['line']) {
self::$i++;
} else {
self::$i = 0;
self::$fl = $bt[1]['file'] . $bt[1]['line'];
}
if ($bt[1]['type'] == '::') {
$lines = file($bt[1]['file']);
preg_match_all('/([a-zA-Z0-9\_]+)::' . $bt[1]['function'] . '/', $lines[$bt[1]['line'] - 1], $matches);
$result = $matches[1][self::$i];
} else if ($bt[1]['type'] == '->') {
$result = get_class($bt[1]['object']);
}
return $result;
}
}
<?php
class Foo {
private static $instance;
static function _get_class_name() {
return self::myNameIs();
}
static function other_code() {
//needs to know
echo self::_get_class_name();
}
}
class Bar extends Foo {
public static function myNameIs() {
self::$instance = new Bar();
return get_class(self::$instance);
}
}
class FooBar extends Foo {
public static function myNameIs() {
self::$instance = new FooBar();
return get_class(self::$instance);
}
}
Bar::other_code(); // i need 'Bar'
FooBar::other_code(); // i need 'FooBar'

Call private methods and private properties from outside a class in PHP

I want to access private methods and variables from outside the classes in very rare specific cases.
I've seen that this is not be possible although introspection is used.
The specific case is the next one:
I would like to have something like this:
class Console
{
final public static function run() {
while (TRUE != FALSE) {
echo "\n> ";
$command = trim(fgets(STDIN));
switch ($command) {
case 'exit':
case 'q':
case 'quit':
echo "OK+\n";
return;
default:
ob_start();
eval($command);
$out = ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();
print("Command: $command");
print("Output:\n$out");
break;
}
}
}
}
This method should be able to be injected in the code like this:
Class Demo
{
private $a;
final public function myMethod()
{
// some code
Console::run();
// some other code
}
final public function myPublicMethod()
{
return "I can run through eval()";
}
private function myPrivateMethod()
{
return "I cannot run through eval()";
}
}
(this is just one simplification. the real one goes through a socket, and implement a bunch of more things...)
So...
If you instantiate the class Demo and you call $demo->myMethod(), you'll get a console: that console can access the first method writing a command like:
> $this->myPublicMethod();
But you cannot run successfully the second one:
> $this->myPrivateMethod();
Do any of you have any idea, or if there is any library for PHP that allows you to do this?
Thanks a lot!
Just make the method public. But if you want to get tricky you can try this (PHP 5.3):
class LockedGate
{
private function open()
{
return 'how did you get in here?!!';
}
}
$object = new LockedGate();
$reflector = new ReflectionObject($object);
$method = $reflector->getMethod('open');
$method->setAccessible(true);
echo $method->invoke($object);
EDIT:
Updated to include examples of private function calls with parameters.
As of PHP 5.4, you can use the predefined Closure class to bind a method/property of a class to a delta functions that has access even to private members.
The Closure class
For example we have a class with a private variable and we want to access it outside the class:
class Foo {
private $bar = "Foo::Bar";
private function add_ab($a, $b) {
return $a + $b;
}
}
PHP 5.4+
$foo = new Foo;
// Single variable example
$getFooBarCallback = function() {
return $this->bar;
};
$getFooBar = $getFooBarCallback->bindTo($foo, 'Foo');
echo $getFooBar(); // Prints Foo::Bar
// Function call with parameters example
$getFooAddABCallback = function() {
// As of PHP 5.6 we can use $this->fn(...func_get_args()) instead of call_user_func_array
return call_user_func_array(array($this, 'add_ab'), func_get_args());
};
$getFooAddAB = $getFooAddABCallback->bindTo($foo, 'Foo');
echo $getFooAddAB(33, 6); // Prints 39
As of PHP 7, you can use the new Closure::call method, to bind any method/property of an obect to a callback function, even for private members:
PHP 7+
$foo = new Foo;
// Single variable example
$getFooBar = function() {
return $this->bar;
};
echo $getFooBar->call($foo); // Prints Foo::Bar
// Function call with parameters example
$getFooAddAB = function() {
return $this->add_ab(...func_get_args());
};
echo $getFooAddAB->call($foo, 33, 6); // Prints 39
The first question you should ask is, if you need to access it from outside the class, why did you declare it private? If it's not your code, the originator probably had a good reason to declare it private, and accessing it directly is a very bad (and largely unmaintainable) practice.
EDIT: As Adam V. points out in the comments, you need to make the private method accessible before invoking it. Code sample updated to include this. I haven't tested it, though - just adding here to keep the answer updated.
That having been said, you can use Reflection to accomplish this. Instantiate ReflectionClass, call getMethod for the method you want to invoke, and then call invoke on the returned ReflectionMethod.
A code sample (though I haven't tested it, so there may be errors) might look like
$demo = new Demo();
$reflection_class = new ReflectionClass("Demo");
$reflection_method = $reflection_class->getMethod("myPrivateMethod");
$reflection_method->setAccessible(true);
$result = $reflection_method->invoke($demo, NULL);
Here's a variation of the other answers that can be used to make such calls one line:
public function callPrivateMethod($object, $methodName)
{
$reflectionClass = new \ReflectionClass($object);
$reflectionMethod = $reflectionClass->getMethod($methodName);
$reflectionMethod->setAccessible(true);
$params = array_slice(func_get_args(), 2); //get all the parameters after $methodName
return $reflectionMethod->invokeArgs($object, $params);
}
I have these problems too sometimes, however I get around it through my coding standards. Private or protected functions are denoted with a prefix underscore ie
private function _myPrivateMethod()
Then i simply make the function public.
public function _myPrivateMethod()
So although the function is public the naming convention gives the notification that whilst public is is private and shouldn't really be used.
If you are able to added a method in the class where the method is defined, you can add method which uses the call_user_method() internally. This works also with PHP 5.2.x
<?php
class SomeClass {
public function callprivate($methodName) {
call_user_method(array($this, $methodName));
}
private function somePrivateMethod() {
echo 'test';
}
}
$object = new SomeClass();
$object->callprivate('somePrivateMethod');
Answer is put public to the method. Whatever trick you are going to do it wouldn't be understandable to fellow developers. For example they do not know that at some other code this function has been accessed as public by looking at the Demo class.
One more thing. that console can access the first method writing a command like:. How can this even be possible? Console can not access demo class functions by using $this.
I guess the reflectionClass is the only alternative if you really want to execute some private methods. Anyhow, if you just need read access to privat or protected properties, you could use this code:
<?php
class Demo
{
private $foo = "bar";
}
$demo = new Demo();
// Will return an object with public, private and protected properties in public scope.
$properties = json_decode(preg_replace('/\\\\u([0-9a-f]{4})|'.get_class($demo).'/i', '', json_encode((array) $demo)));
?>
<?php
$request="email";
$data=[1,2,3,4,5];
$name=new Update($request,$data);
class Update{
private $request;
private $data;
function __construct($request,$data){
$this->request=$request;
$this->data=$data;
if($this->request=='email'){
$this->update_email();
}
else{
echo "Can't do anything";
}
}
private function update_email(){
echo $this->request;
echo '\n';
foreach($this->data as $x){
echo $x."\n";
}
}
}
?>

Pass functions to a class

PHP
mysql database
I have created a follow on question to this one here that is specifically about pagination
I need to call a method from one class in another, and be able to change the method that is called. Like so
class db{
function a(){ echo 'I run a query';}
function b(){ echo 'im the other query';}
}
class YourClass {
var $fcn;
$db = new db()
function invoke(){
call_user_func($this->fcn);
}
}
$instance = new YourClass;
$instance->fcn = 'db->a';
$instance->invoke();
I want to use a method 'a' from the db class in the 'yourClass' method 'invoke'
Thanks
Ok this is what i have put together from the answers provided and it works.
class A {
function a(){
$x = 'Method a is used';
return $x;
}
function b(){
$x = 'Method b is used';
return $x;
}
}
class B {
function invoke($obj, $method){
echo call_user_func( array( $obj, $method) );
}
}
$instance = new B();
$instance->invoke(new A(),"a");
Which writes, 'Method a is used' to the screen
But i really want to be able to pass arguments to method "a" so i tried the code below.
class A {
function a($var1,$var2,$var3){
$x = 'the three passed values are ' . $var1 . ' and ' . $var2 . ' and ' . $var3;
return $x;
}
function b(){
$x = 'im method b';
return $x;
}
}
class B {
function invoke($obj,$arguments){
echo call_user_func_array($obj,$arguments);
}
}
$arguments = array('apple','banana','pineapple');
$use_function = array(new A(),"a");
$instance = new B();
$instance->invoke($use_function,$arguments);
It almost works but i get these errors above the correct answer
Missing argument 1 for A::a(),.....for argument 2 and 3 as well but then the answer prints to the screen
"the three passed values are apple and banana and pineapple"
I'm probably making a rookie mistake I've been coding all day. If someone could fix the script above and submit the working code, I would be eternally grateful. I have to put this issue to bed so i can go to bed.
Thanks
As of PHP5.3 you could use closures or functors to pass methods around. Prior to that, you could write an anonymous function with create_function(), but that is rather awkward.
Basically, what you are trying to do could be done with the Strategy Pattern.
removed example code, as it wasn't helpful anymore after the OP changed the question (see wiki)
Apart from that, you might want to look into Fowlers's Data Source Architectural Patterns. The Zend Framework (and pretty much all other PHP frameworks) offers database access classes you could use for these patterns and there is also a paginator class, so why not check them out to learn how they did it.
removed EDIT 1 as it wasn't helpful anymore after the OP changed the question (see wiki)
EDIT 2
Ok, let's take a step by step approach to this (not using a Strategy Pattern though)
What you are asking for in the question can easily be solved with this code:
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
echo 'bar method in Foo';
}
}
class MyInvoker
{
protected $myObject;
public function __construct()
{
$this->myObject = new Foo();
}
public function __call($method, $args)
{
$invocation = array($this->myObject, $method);
return call_user_func_array($invocation, $args);
}
}
With this code you'd just call the appropriate methods. No setting of methods names. No clumsy extra invoke method. No reinventing of how methods are called. You dont need it, because PHP has the __call function that you just taught to send all methods not existing in MyInvoker to $myObject, e.g. Foo.:
$invoker = new MyInvoker;
$invoker->bar(); // outputs 'bar method in Foo called'
You might just as well have extended MyInvoker to be a subclass of Foo, e.g.
class MyInvoker extends Foo {}
and then you could do the same. This not what you need though and it illustrates how pointless it is, to do such a thing. MyInvoker now does nothing by itself. It is an empty class and effectively the same as Foo. Even with the previous approach using the __call method it is not doing anything. This is why I have asked you to be more specific about the desired outcome, which is a Paginator.
First try:
class Paginator()
{
// A class holding all possible queries of our application
protected $queries;
// A class providing access to the database, like PDO_MySql
protected $dbConn;
public function __construct()
{
$this->db = new MyPdo();
$this->queries = new DbQueries();
}
public function __call($method, $args)
{
$invocation = array($this->queries, $method);
$query = call_user_func_array($invocation, $args);
return $this->dbConn->query($query);
}
}
With that code, our Paginator creates everything it needs inside itself, tightly coupling the db connection class and all queries and it allows you to call upon these, like so
$paginator = new Paginator;
// assuming we have something like getImageCount() in DbQueries
echo $paginator->getImageCount();
What is happening then is, Paginator will recognize it doesnt know getImageCount() and will invoke the __call method. The __call method will try to invoke the getImageCount() method on the DbQueries. Since it exists, it will return the query, which in turn is passed to the db connection to execute it. Great you'd say, but it's not. In fact, this is horrible. Your paginator's responsibility is to count items in a table and fetch items from this table in a certain range and amount. But right now, it is not doing anything like this. It is completely oblivious to whats going on, so lets try a new class:
class Paginator
{
protected $dbConn;
protected $itemCount;
public function __construct($dbConn)
{
$this->dbConn = $dbConn;
}
public function countItems($query)
{
$this->itemCount = $this->dbConn->query('select count(*) from (?)', $query);
return $this->itemCount;
}
public function fetchItems($query, $offset = 0, $limit = 20)
{
$sql = sprintf('select * from (?) LIMIT %d, %d', $offset, $limit);
return $this->dbConn->query($sql, $query);
}
}
Much better. Now our Paginator is an aggregate instead of a composite, meaning it does not instantiate objects inside itself, but requires them to be passed to it in the constructor. This is called dependency injection (and also provides a loose coupling, when dbConn uses an interface) which will make your app much more maintainable, as it is easy to exchange components now. This will also come in handy when Unit Testing your code.
In addition, your Paginator now concentrates on what it is supposed to do: counting and fetching items of an arbitrary query. No need to pass methods around. No need for obscure method invocation. You'd use it like this:
$paginator = new Paginator($dbConn);
$query = $dbQueries->findImagesUploadedLastWeek(); // returns SQL query string
$images = $paginator->countItems($query);
if($images > 0) {
$images = $paginator->fetchItems($query);
}
And that's it. Well, almost. You'd have to render the pagination of course. But this should be rather trivial, if you extend what you already have above. The $imageCount property is a hint at where to go next.
Anyway, hope that I could shed some light.
P.S. The $this->dbConn->query($sql, $query) calls are of course dummy code. Dont expect to be able to copy and paste it and get it working. In addition, you should make sure the queries added to the Paginator SQL is safe to use. You wouldnt want someone to insert a query that deletes all your db rows. Never trust user input.
P.P.S. $query should be an SQL query string. Check the PHP manual for PDO::prepare. In general, it yields better performance and security to prepare a statement before executing it. The page in the manual will give you the clues about the ? in the query calls. If you dont want to use PDO, just use sprintf() or str_replace() to replace ? with $query, e.g. $this->dbConn->query(sprintf('SELECT count(*) from (%s)', $query) but keep in mind that this has none of the benefits of a prepared statement and potentially opens the door for SQL Injection vulnerabilities.
P.P.P.S Yes, Dependency Injection is generally a preferred strategy. This is an advanved topic though and might be too much to fully grasp right now, but it's well worth looking into it. For now, it should be enough if you try to favor favor aggregation over composition. Your classes should only do what they are responsible for and get any dependencies through the constructor.
Here are two ways of doing it:
class YourClass {
var $fcn;
function invoke($arguments){
//one way:
$this->{$this->fcn}($arguments);
//another way:
call_user_func_array(array($this, $this->fcn), $arguments);
}
function a(){
echo 'I am a()';
}
}
$instance = new YourClass;
$instance->fcn = 'a';
$instance->invoke();
This'll print out "I am a()" from inside the class.
you are almost there
class db {
function a(){ echo 'I run a query';}
function b(){ echo 'im the other query';}
}
class YourClass {
var $fcn;
function __construct() {
$this->db = new db();
}
function invoke() {
call_user_func(array(
$this->{$this->fcn[0]},
$this->fcn[1]
));
}
}
$instance = new YourClass;
$instance->fcn = array('db', 'a');
$instance->invoke();
$instance->fcn = array('db', 'b');
$instance->invoke();
the syntax is quite fancy, but it works
// edit: from your comment it looks like the simplest option is to pass method name as string, like this
class Paginator {
function __consturct($db, $counter_func) ...
function get_count() {
$args = func_get_args();
return call_user_func_array(
array($this->db, $this->counter_func),
$args);
}
}
new Paginator($db, 'get_num_products');
I am guessing that you are using php here. Php supports variable functions which might solve you problem but as far as I am aware does not support delegates/function pointers.
What database are you using? I would be against putting queries within the code and using stored procedures as an alternative, if this is supported in the database you are using. This may solve the underlying problem you have.
Are you asking if PHP has functional references? It doesn't. But it does let you call functions by putting their name in a string, or an array of a class name and method name.
See call_user_func() for a description, and variable functions.
class DB {
function a(){ echo 'I run a query';}
function b(){ echo 'im the other query';}
}
class B {
protected $db;
private $method;
function __constructor($db) { $this->db; }
function invoke($m){
$this->method = $m;
// Non static call
call_user_func( array( $this->db, $this->method ) );
}
}
$db = new DB();
$b = new B($db);
$b->invoke('a');
I have made little modifications to my initial answer. You could also check out this post, it may help:
Database and OOP Practices in PHP
The Observer Design Pattern may be useful for this sort of thing, or it might be a misuse of the pattern; I don't know yet. Anyway, for your consideration:
class DbObserver implements SplObserver
{
public function update(SplSubject $subject) // Required
{
$method = $subject->getObserverMethod();
$args = $subject->getObserverArgs();
$this->$method($args);
}
private function a($args)
{
echo 'I run query ' . $args[0] . '<br />';
}
private function b($args)
{
echo 'I run query ' . $args[0] . ' because ' . $args[1] . '<br />';
}
private function c()
{
echo 'I have no argument' . '<br />';
}
}
class ObserverObserver implements SplObserver
{
public function update(SplSubject $subject) // Required
{
if (count($subject->getAttached()) > 1) {
echo 'I saw that<br />';
} else {
echo 'Nothing happened<br />';
}
}
}
class DbSubject implements SplSubject
{
private $observerMethod;
private $observerArgs = array();
private $attached = array();
public function notify() // Required
{
foreach ($this->attached as $each) {
$each->update($this);
}
}
public function attach(SplObserver $observer) // Required
{
$this->attached[] = $observer;
}
public function detach(SplObserver $observer) // Required
{
$key = array_keys($this->attached, $observer);
unset($this->attached[$key[0]]);
}
public function setObserverMethod($method, $args = array())
{
$this->observerMethod = $method;
$this->observerArgs = $args;
return $this;
}
public function getObserverMethod()
{
return $this->observerMethod;
}
public function getObserverArgs()
{
return $this->observerArgs;
}
public function getAttached()
{
return $this->attached;
}
}
$db_subj = new DbSubject;
$db_obs = new DbObserver;
$db_subj->attach($db_obs);
$args = array('A');
$db_subj->setObserverMethod('a', $args)->notify();
$args = array('B', 'I can');
$db_subj->setObserverMethod('b', $args)->notify();
$obsvr = new ObserverObserver;
$db_subj->attach($obsvr);
$db_subj->setObserverMethod('c')->notify();
$db_subj->detach($db_obs);
$db_subj->notify();
/**
I run query A
I run query B because I can
I have no argument
I saw that
Nothing happened
**/
You need to make this change:
$arguments = array('apple','banana','pineapple');
$a = new A();
$use_function = array(&$a,"a"); // Make this changes to your code
$instance = new B();
$instance->invoke($use_function,$arguments);
class A {
function a(){ echo 'I run a query';}
function b(){ echo 'im the other query';}
}
class B {
function Test() {
invoke(new $A(), "a");
}
function invoke($obj, $method){
// Non static call
call_user_func( array( $obj, $method ) );
// Static call
//call_user_func( array( 'ClassName', 'method' ) );
}
}
I hope this helps.

Categories