all combination between 1-7 without any duplicates - php

I found this here PHP take all combinations
I modified it further to include n number of sets to the given array. However i am not able to figure out how to not get any duplicate numbers in a set. for example
If the output is
1 , 1, 3, 4
then it should remove the extra '1' and give it as
1,3,4
similarly if there are 2 outputs.
1,3,4,5 and 4,5,3,1
then it should remove one of the duplicate set as well.
I tried using array_unique and thought it could solve half of the issue however it gave a memory allocation error.
<?php
function permutations($arr,$n)
{
$res = array();
foreach ($arr as $w)
{
if ($n==1) $res[] = $w;
else
{
$perms = permutations($arr,$n-1);
foreach ($perms as $p)
{
$res[] = $w." ".$p;
}
}
}
return $res;
}
// Your array
$numbers = array(1,2,3,4,5,6,7);
// Get permutation by groups of n elements
for($i=1; $i<8; $i++)
$pe = permutations($numbers,$i);
$pe = array_unique($pe);
// Print it out
print_r($pe);
?>

Related

Consolidate array of numbers without exceeding a predefined maximum value per element

I'm trying to combine numbers in an array by adding them so that the max value can only by 30.
For example, this is my array:
array(10,30,10,10,15);
After combining the numbers in the array to items with a max value 30, the result should be:
array(30,30,15);
How to achieve this?
I'm trying to combine numbers in an array by adding them so that the
max value can only by 30
So, when you combine numbers, you can achieve the lowest possible set of values in your array and also make sure that max value remains 30 by:
First, sort them.
Second, keeping adding elements to sum till you are about to get a sum > 30.
Third, once an element can no longer be added to a sum, add the current sum in your array and make the current element as the new sum.
Code:
<?php
$arr = array(10,30,10,10,15);
sort($arr);
$res = [];
$curr_sum = 0;
foreach($arr as $each_value){
if($curr_sum + $each_value <= 30) $curr_sum += $each_value;
else{
$res[] = $curr_sum;
$curr_sum = $each_value;
}
}
$res[] = $curr_sum;
print_r($res);
Demo: https://3v4l.org/BYhuE
Update: If order of the numbers matters, seeing your current output, you could just use rsort() to show them in descending order.
rsort($res);
$total = array_sum(array(10,30,10,10,15)); //assign sum totals from orignal array
$maxValue = 30; //assign max value allowed in array
$numberOfWholeOccurancesOfMaxValue = floor($total/$maxValue);
$remainder = $total%$maxValue;
//build array
$i=0;
while ( $i < $numberOfWholeOccurancesOfMaxValue ){
$array[] = $maxValue;
$i++;
}
$array[] = $remainder;
print_r($array);
You can loop only once to get this,
$temp = array(10,30,10,10,15);
natsort($temp); // sorting to reduce hustle and complication
$result = [];
$i = 0;
$maxValue = 30;
foreach($temp as $v){
// checking sum is greater or value is greater or $v is greater than equal to
if(!empty($result[$i]) && (($result[$i]+$v) > $maxValue)){
$i++;
}
$result[$i] = (!empty($result[$i]) ? ($result[$i]+$v) : $v);
}
print_r($result);
Working demo.
I believe finding most space-optimized/compact result requires a nested loop. My advice resembles the firstFitDecreasing() function in this answer of mine except in this case the nested loops are accessing the same array. I've added a couple of simple conditions to prevent needless iterations.
rsort($array);
foreach ($array as $k1 => &$v1) {
if ($v1 >= $limit) {
continue;
}
foreach ($array as $k2 => $v2) {
if ($k1 !== $k2 && $v1 + $v2 <= $limit) {
$v1 += $v2;
unset($array[$k2]);
if ($v1 === $limit) {
continue 2;
}
}
}
}
rsort($array);
var_export($array);
By putting larger numbers before smaller numbers before processing AND by attempting to add multiple subsequent values to earlier values, having fewer total elements in the result is possible.
See my comparative demonstration.
I believe #Clint's answer is misinterpreting the task and is damaging the data by summing all values then distributing the max amounts in the result array.
With more challenging input data like $array = [10,30,5,10,5,13,14,15,10,5]; and $limit = 30;, my solution provides a more dense result versus #nice_dev's and #rahul's answers.

How to add up the total of 1 array + the total of another array

I am a rookie beginner with PHP, i was wondering how i could add up the total number from 1 array + the total number of another array together. I managed to make this code with help from stackoverflow answers on google. I don't know why but it's no where explained or i am looking over it. Been looking for almost an hour to make this work. Here is the code:
<?php
$array = array(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19);
$odds = array();
$even = array();
foreach($array as $val) {
if($val % 2 == 0) {
$even[] = $val;
} else {
$odds[] = $val;
}
}
$array = array();
foreach($even as $key => $val) {
$array[] = $val;
if(isset($odds[$key])) {
$array[] = $odds[$key];
}
}
echo '<b>Oneven</b> ';
print_r($odds);
echo '<br><br><br>';
echo "Bovenstaande <b>oneven</b> getallen bijelkaar opgeteld = " . array_sum($odds) . "\n";
echo '<br><br><br><hr style="margin-top:2%;margin-bottom:4%;">';
/* Array nummer 2 */
$array = array(20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40);
$odds = array();
$even = array();
foreach($array as $val) {
if($val % 2 == 0) {
$even[] = $val;
} else {
$odds[] = $val;
}
}
$array = array();
foreach($even as $key => $val) {
$array[] = $val;
if(isset($odds[$key])) {
$array[] = $odds[$key];
}
}
echo '<b>Even</b> ';
print_r($even);
echo '<br><br><br>';
echo "Bovenstaande <b>even</b> getallen bijelkaar opgeteld = " . array_sum($even) . "\n";
?>
So i don't know how to do it in another way but i have array 1 code at first and then code 2 begins with another array.
The thing is that i want to make a program that includes the odd numbers from 1 to 19 and the even numbers from 20 to 40 and then count the total of those 2 array's. Is there a way to do this in 1 code and count up the total of those 2 array's together. I already have that part of code that it counts the array, in code 1 that is 100 and in code 2 it is 330.
330+100=430 that's the output that i want. Why is that so hard? haha...
I appreciate the help and time effort.
First off, there's a lot of complexity involved in creating the initial array and then extracting only the odd numbers. This complexity can be eliminating by using the range and array_filter functions like so:
$odds = array_filter(range(1, 19), function($elem) {
return $elem & 1;
});
$even = array_filter(range(20, 40), function($elem) {
return $elem % 2 == 0;
});
to calculate sum of the sum of odds plus the sum of even, you can simply merge them together and use array_sum in the same you are doing for the individual arrays
$totalSum = array_sum(array_merge($odds, $even))
As #Darragh pointed out in the comments, you can simplify the array creation by specifying a step parameter for the range function.
$odds = range(1, 19, 2) // start at 1, go up to 19, by increments of 2

How to get first missing number out 100 from an array in php

hi i have created watch points in this columns 1,2,3,4,5.....100 will come
Example: 1,2,4,5,34,56,100
from above 3 is missing first this number should return
$watchPoints = $videoWatchedData['watch_points'];
$fetArray = explode(",",$watchPoints); //unsorted 2,4,5,100,56,1,34
i want to sort the above one like this 1,2,4,5,34,56,100 and return first missing number.
What i have tried:
$sortFetchedArraysort = sort($fetArray ); //ksort,rosrt no one is working
$Expected = 1;
foreach ($sortFetchedArraysort as $Number){
if ($Expected != $Number) {
break;
}
$Expected++;
}
$percentageCount = $Number; // first missing number in my case output should return 3
exit;
Two problem i am facing one is sort not working second first missing number is not trturning.
Try this few code, check the live demo.
<?php
sort($array = explode(',', "10,1,2,4,5,6,25,36,75,100"));
print_r(current(array_diff(range(1, 100), $array)));
Hope this simple one, will be helpful for you. In your post you are sorting $fetArray but there is no need, you can check it like this.
<?php
ini_set('display_errors', 1);
$array=range(1,100);//your columns
//you should sort like this, but it is not at all required
$fetArray=array(2,4,5,100,56,1,34);
sort($fetArray);
//looping over array in which we are trying to find
foreach($array as $value)
{
//at the moment your that value is not present in array we will break from loop
if(!in_array($value, $fetArray))
{
break;
}
}
//at the moment we break from loop we will get the value which is not present
echo $value;
$watchPoints = "10,1,2,4,5,6,25,36,75,100";
$fetArray = explode(",", $watchPoints);
sort($fetArray);
for ($i = 0; $i < sizeof($fetArray); $i++) {
if ($fetArray[$i] != $i + 1) {
$missing = $i + 1;
break;
}
}
print($missing);

Reorder elements in array evenly

Say i have:
$array = (1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0);
What I'm trying to achive is to reorder elements evenly in it.
PHP's function shuffle() don't fits here, because i want some distance between same digits. So 1's has to be somewhere in the beginning of array, in the middle and in the end too.
I google about Fisher-Yates_shuffle algorithm, but it seems to work exactly like shuffle().
Thanks in advance!
I think this is close to what you ask: A constant, reasonably even distribution of the items in an array.
// The input array. 0s are regarded as blanks.
$array = array(1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0);
// Count the times each item occurs. PHP will probably have a function for that, but I don't know.
$counter = array();
foreach ($array as $item)
{
// Zeros are infill. Don't process them now, only process the other numbers and
// the zeros will occupy the remaining space.
if ($item === 0)
continue;
if (!array_key_exists($item, $counter))
$counter[$item] = 0;
$counter[$item]++;
}
// Reverse sort by quantity. This results in the best distribution.
arsort($counter);
// Pre-fill a new array with zeros.
$resultCount = count($array);
$result = array_fill(0, $resultCount, 0);
// Distribute the items in the array, depending on the number of times they occur.
foreach ($counter as $item => $count)
{
// Determine the division for this item, based on its count.
$step = $resultCount / $count;
// Add the item the right number of times.
for ($i = 0; $i < $count; $i++)
{
// Start with the index closest to the preferred one (based on the calculated step).
$index = 0;
$startIndex = (int)($step * $i);
// Count up until a right index is found.
for ($index = $startIndex; $index < $resultCount; $index++)
{
if ($result[$index] === 0)
{
$result[$index] = $item;
break;
}
}
// If no proper index was found, count fown from the starting index.
if ($index === $resultCount)
{
for ($index = $startIndex; $index >= 0; $index--)
{
if ($result[$index] === 0)
{
$result[$index] = $item;
break;
}
}
}
// Still no proper index found, that shouldn't be possible. There's always room.
if ($index === -1)
{
throw new Exception('This cannot not happen');
}
}
}
var_dump($result);
For array:
1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
It returns:
3,2,1,0,3,0,0,0,3,0,2,1,3,0,0,0,3,0,0,0,0,3,2,1,0,3,0,0,0,3,0,2,1,3,0,0,0,3,0,0,0,0
For array:
1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,0,0
It returns:
4,4,3,4,3,4,2,4,3,4,2,4,3,4,1,4,3,4,1,4,0,4,4,3,4,3,4,2,4,3,4,2,4,3,4,1,4,3,4,1,4,0
Which I think is a neat distribution. Thanks to datdo for the idea of sorting the intermediate array.

PHP Array shuffle, keeping unique

this is my first php script and problem, I've searched hours with no conclusion other than looping a function" too many laterations". but it doesn't solve my problem I've never studied programming or what ever so I'm hoping that there is an educated person to fill me in on this:
I have an array that contains 120 elements; consists of duplicates eg:
myArray = [0]= item_1, [1] = item _1, [2] = item_2, [3] = item_3 ect..
Briefly I'm trying to make a flash php pokermachine but I need these items in the array to be shuffled BUT I do not want the duplicates to be next to each other after the shuffle but I need the duplicates to be still in the array
I can't do a loop function to check this because it will change the shuffle too many times which will effect the odds of the game: below is what I currently have:
/ * Removed the link here that is no longer available */
you may notice at times it will double up with 2 items in the same reel
Basically I created the virtual reel dynamically with php.ini file
these values are repeatedly pushed into an array($virtualreel) so the value may appear 10 times in the reel and another value will appear 5 times variating the odds. Then after I take a random slice() from the $virtualreel to display 3 vars from this reel and repeat the loop 4 more times for the other reels, also I only can shuffle once as I want the slice() to be from the same reels array order
I only shuffle every new spin not running loop functions to shuffle if I double up on a slice(array,3 items).
hope I've explained what I'm after well enough to give you guys an idea.
You can use this function:
<?php
function shuffleArray($myArray) {
$value_count = array_count_values($myArray);
foreach($value_count as $key=>$value) {
if ($value > count($myArray)/2) {
return false;
}
}
$last_value = $myArray[count($myArray) - 1];
unset($myArray[count($myArray) - 1]);
$shuffle = array();
$last = false;
while (count($myArray) > 0) {
$keys = array_keys($myArray);
$i = round(rand(0, count($keys) - 1));
while ($last === $myArray[$keys[$i]]) {
$i = round(rand(0, count($keys) - 1));
}
$shuffle[] = $myArray[$keys[$i]];
$last = $myArray[$keys[$i]];
unset($myArray[$keys[$i]]);
}
if ($last_value === $last) {
$i = 0;
foreach($shuffle as $key=>$value) {
if ($value !== $last_value) {
$i = $key;
break;
}
}
array_splice($shuffle, $i + 1, 0, $last_value);
} else {
$shuffle[] = $last_value;
}
return $shuffle;
}
print_r(shuffleArray(array(1,5,5,3,7,7)));
Why not just:
Edit :
$shuffled = array();
while(count($to_shuffle) > 0):
$i = rand(0, count($to_shuffle)-1);
$shuffled[] = $to_shuffle[$i];
array_splice($to_shuffle, $i, 1,null);
endwhile;
I think this is what you were expecting, if you don't mind not preserving the association between keys and values.

Categories