By default, self-referencing ManyToMany relationships under Doctrine involve an owning side and an inverse side, as explained in the documentation.
Is there a way to implement a reciprocal association whithout difference between both sides?
Following the example in the docs:
<?php
/** #Entity **/
class User
{
// ...
/**
* #ManyToMany(targetEntity="User")
**/
private $friends;
public function __construct() {
$this->friends = new \Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection();
}
// ...
}
So, adding entity1 to entity2s friends implies that entity2 will be in entity1s friends.
There are a number of ways to solve this problem, all depending on what the requirements for the "friends" relation are.
Unidirectional
A simple approach would be to use a unidirectional ManyToMany association, and treat it as if it where a bidirectional one (keeping both sides in sync):
/**
* #Entity
*/
class User
{
/**
* #Id
* #Column(type="integer")
*/
private $id;
/**
* #ManyToMany(targetEntity="User")
* #JoinTable(name="friends",
* joinColumns={#JoinColumn(name="user_a_id", referencedColumnName="id")},
* inverseJoinColumns={#JoinColumn(name="user_b_id", referencedColumnName="id")}
* )
* #var \Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection
*/
private $friends;
/**
* Constructor.
*/
public function __construct()
{
$this->friends = new \Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection();
}
/**
* #return array
*/
public function getFriends()
{
return $this->friends->toArray();
}
/**
* #param User $user
* #return void
*/
public function addFriend(User $user)
{
if (!$this->friends->contains($user)) {
$this->friends->add($user);
$user->addFriend($this);
}
}
/**
* #param User $user
* #return void
*/
public function removeFriend(User $user)
{
if ($this->friends->contains($user)) {
$this->friends->removeElement($user);
$user->removeFriend($this);
}
}
// ...
}
When you call $userA->addFriend($userB), $userB will be added to the friends-collection in $userA, and $userA will be added to the friends-collection in $userB.
It will also result in 2 records added to the "friends" table (1,2 and 2,1). While this can be seen as duplicate data, it will simplify your code a lot. For example when you need to find all friends of $userA, you can simply do:
SELECT u FROM User u JOIN u.friends f WHERE f.id = :userId
No need to check 2 different properties as you would with a bidirectional association.
Bidirectional
When using a bidirectional association the User entity will have 2 properties, $myFriends and $friendsWithMe for example. You can keep them in sync the same way as described above.
The main difference is that on a database level you'll only have one record representing the relationship (either 1,2 or 2,1). This makes "find all friends" queries a bit more complex because you'll have to check both properties.
You could of course still use 2 records in the database by making sure addFriend() will update both $myFriends and $friendsWithMe (and keep the other side in sync). This will add some complexity in your entities, but queries become a little less complex.
OneToMany / ManyToOne
If you need a system where a user can add a friend, but that friend has to confirm that they are indeed friends, you'll need to store that confirmation in the join-table. You then no longer have a ManyToMany association, but something like User <- OneToMany -> Friendship <- ManyToOne -> User.
You can read my blog-posts on this subject:
Doctrine 2: How to handle join tables with extra columns
More on one-to-many/many-to-one associations in Doctrine 2
Related
I'm working with relationships in Doctrine (using Symfony 5).
What I have is these 2 relations:
User
Availability
User has an ID and has Many Availabilities.
So Entity User has
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="UserAvailability", mappedBy="user")
*/
private $availability;
and the reverse on Entity Availability.
Availability is a relation with:
id, user_id, day_name, start_time and end_time, that simple.
What I already achieved with ManyToMany and I want to achieve in this case too is:
I need to receive the entire set of availabilities for a User from the client and use it to update the availabilities of my User, so I defined a setAvailability method which receives a Collection of Availability entities and simply does
$this->availabilities = $availabilities.
This works when I add new availabilities but the ones that are on the DB and not in the collection are not dropped when I persist the entity.
The same method works flawlessly with ManyToMany Relationship.
What am I missing?
*** UPDATE **
public function setAvailability($availability): self
{
$this->availability = $availability;
return $this;
}
this same code works when removing relations in ManyToMany relationship but not in ManyToOne, the attribute "availability" is correctly set, but when using persist/flush the availability which was removed is not removed on the DB.
Thanks
Try to set the attributes as in the example from the doctrine documentation below :
<?php
use Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection;
/** #Entity */
class User
{
// ...
/**
* One user has many availabilities. This is the inverse side.
* #OneToMany(targetEntity="Availability", mappedBy="user")
*/
private $availabilities;
// ...
public function __construct() {
$this->availabilities = new ArrayCollection();
}
}
/** #Entity */
class Availability
{
// ...
/**
* Many availabilities have one user. This is the owning side.
* #ManyToOne(targetEntity="User", inversedBy="availabilities")
* #JoinColumn(name="user_id", referencedColumnName="id")
*/
private $user;
// ...
}
the attribute mappedBy and inversedBy are necessary for relations
I use APYDataGridBundle for generating a data table.
I have Person entity with a relation (1 gym can have more people):
/**
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="App\Entity\Gym", inversedBy="persons")
*/
private $gym;
I generate a grid with a list of people in controller:
public function indexAction(Grid $grid)
{
// Creates a simple grid based on your entity (ORM)
$source = new Entity(Person::class);
$grid->setSource($source);
return $grid->getGridResponse('Person/index.html.twig');
It shows me the grid with all non-relational columns, but the gym column not, because of the relation.
I can't find the solution in doc: https://github.com/APY/APYDataGridBundle/blob/master/Resources/doc/summary.md
Can you help me?
In Person entity:
/**
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="App\Entity\Gym", inversedBy="persons")
*
* #GRID\Column(field="gym.id", title="Gym ID")
* #GRID\Column(field="gym.title", title="Gym Title")
*/
private $gym;
I have 2 tables: jobs and categories. The first table has a field called cat_id which is a reference to categories.id. In my Entity Class Job I have annotations like this:
/**
* #ManyToOne(targetEntity="Category")
* #JoinColumn(name="cat_id", referencedColumnName="id")
**/
private $category;
public function __construct()
{
$this->category = new \Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection();
}
And in my Category Class I have:
/**
* #OneToMany(targetEntity="Job", mappedBy="job")
* #JoinColumn(name="id", referencedColumnName="cat_id")
*/
private $jobs;
public function __construct()
{
$this->jobs = new \Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection();
}
All I want is to get all jobs with their categories and all jobs by category. But I'm still new to Doctrine.
You appear to be overlooking some elements of the owning vs the inverse side of Doctrine relationship mappings. I suggest you read 12. Association Updates: Owning Side and Inverse Side in the Doctrine manual for more details.
Essentially, one side of a 1:N relationship will be the Owning side, and the other the Inverse side. The owning side is the one that actually maps the relationship, while the inverse side simply reflects that mapping. - In your code, you've put the JoinColumn on both sides, as if both are supposed to be the owning side.
Your code should have the Job.category property as the owning side, and the Category.jobs property as the inverse side. So start by changing the Job entity to look more like this:
/**
* #var Category
*
* #ManyToOne(targetEntity="Category", inversedBy="jobs")
* #JoinColumn(name="cat_id", referencedColumnName="id")
**/
private $category;
public function __construct()
{
// $category would be a single instance of Category,
// not a collection. Otherwise you'd be looking at a
// ManyToMany relationship.
}
And then change the Category entity to look like this:
/**
* #var ArrayCollection
*
* #OneToMany(targetEntity="Job", mappedBy="category")
*/
private $jobs;
public function __construct()
{
$this->jobs = new \Doctrine\Common\Collections\ArrayCollection();
}
Note that in the Job entity, I've added the inversedBy attribute to the ManyToOne annotation, indicating the Category.jobs property as the inverse side of the mapping. Then I've removed the JoinColumn from the Category.jobs attribute, since the inverse side shouldn't actually specify a mapping directly; it is reflects the mapping of the owning side.
I got two entities with a simple OneToMany relation and anything works as expected.
The user entity:
class User {
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="Vita", mappedBy="owner")
*/
}
and the vita entity:
class Vita {
/**
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="User", inversedBy="vitas")
*/
}
So far, so good. But now I changed the vita entity and added the meta entity with a OneToOne relation. This entity knows the owner and other stuff, but the vita does not have longer a owner property.
What I am looking for is the oppotunity to use the third table as reference. Is there a common doctrine way? Something like that?
class User {
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="Vita", mappedBy="meta.owner")
*/
}
EDIT:
User
- id
- username
- password
Vita
- id
- meta_id
- [other fields]
Meta
- id
- owner_id (User)
- modifier_id (User)
- [other fields]
One User has many Vita
One Vita has one Meta
First the owner_id was a property of vita and now it moved into meta.
According to the relationship schema, it should look like this:
class User {
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="Meta", mappedBy="owner")
*/
protected $metasOwned;
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="Meta", mappedBy="modifier")
*/
protected $metasModified;
}
class Vita {
/**
* #ORM\OneToOne(targetEntity="Meta", inversedBy="vita")
*/
protected $meta;
}
class Meta {
/**
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="User", inversedBy="metasOwned")
*/
protected $owner;
/**
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="User", inversedBy="metasModified")
*/
protected $modifier;
/**
* #ORM\OneToOne(targetEntity="Vita", mappedBy="meta")
*/
protected $vita;
}
Notice that variable names correlate with the inverse-side of the relationships.
Then you just run the command
php app/console doctrine:generate:entities Your/AwesomeBundle/Entity
and it will create getters & setters for you and you will be all set.
Your/AwesomeBundle/Entity: the real path is or could be src/Your/AwesomeBundle/Entity.
I have two entities user1 and skills, where one user will have many skills.
/** #Entity **/
class user1 {
/** #Id #Column(type="integer") #GeneratedValue **/
public $id;
/** #Column(type="string") **/
public $name;
/**
*
* #OneToMany(targetEntity="skills", mappedBy="uid")
*/
public $skillset;
}
/** #Entity **/
class skills {
/** #Id #Column(type="integer") #GeneratedValue **/
public $id;
/** #Column(type="string") **/
public $skill;
/**
* #ManyToOne(targetEntity="user1", inversedBy="skillset")
**/
public $uid;
}
But I want to fetch all the records using entityManager and getrepository like
$usr= $entityManager->getRepository("user1")->findAll();
But it gives me data from table 'user1' only. And I am not able to fetch the data from 'skills' which is associated to particular user.
'uid' is the foreign key in 'skills' table of 'id' in 'user1' table.
I think you may prefer a ManyToMany relationship, because many users will have many skills.
Then you don't have to refer fields as IDs - and ORM's purpose is to hide the relational structure under the object relationship: your $uid field should be called $user.
Such said, your syntax is correct - are you sure your database schema is in sync with the entities? Have you got proper data in it? If you var_dump a single user, what you get?