Related
I need to be able to call a function, but the function name is stored in a variable, is this possible? e.g:
function foo ()
{
//code here
}
function bar ()
{
//code here
}
$functionName = "foo";
// I need to call the function based on what is $functionName
$functionName() or call_user_func($functionName)
My favorite version is the inline version:
${"variableName"} = 12;
$className->{"propertyName"};
$className->{"methodName"}();
StaticClass::${"propertyName"};
StaticClass::{"methodName"}();
You can place variables or expressions inside the brackets too!
Solution: Use PHP7
Note: For a summarized version, see TL;DR at the end of the answer.
Old Methods
Update: One of the old methods explained here has been removed. Refer to other answers for explanation on other methods, it isn't covered here. By the way, if this answer doesn't help you, you should return upgrading your stuff. PHP 5.6 support has ended in January 2019 (now even PHP 7.2 and 7.3 are not being supported). See supported versions for more information.
As others mentioned, in PHP5 (and also in newer versions like PHP7) we could use variables as function names, use call_user_func() and call_user_func_array(), etc.
New Methods
As of PHP7, there are new ways introduced:
Note: Everything inside <something> brackets means one or more expressions to form something, e.g. <function_name> means expressions forming a function name.
Dynamic Function Call: Function Name On-the-fly
We can form a function name inside parentheses in just one go:
(<function_name>)(arguments);
For example:
function something(): string
{
return "something";
}
$bar = "some_thing";
(str_replace("_", "", $bar))(); // something
// Possible, too; but generally, not recommended, because makes your
// code more complicated
(str_replace("_", "", $bar))()();
Note: Although removing the parentheses around str_replace() is not an error, putting parentheses makes code more readable. However, you cannot do that sometimes, e.g. while using . operator. To be consistent, I recommend you to put the parentheses always.
Dynamic Function Call: Callable Property
A useful example would be in the context of objects: If you have stored a callable in a property, you have to call it this way:
($object->{<property_name>})();
As a simple example:
// Suppose we're in a class method context
($this->eventHandler)();
Obviously, calling it as $this->eventHandler() is plain wrong: By that you mean calling a method named eventHandler.
Dynamic Method Call: Method Name On-the-fly
Just like dynamic function calls, we can do the same way with method calls, surrounded by curly braces instead of parentheses (for extra forms, navigate to TL;DR section):
$object->{<method_name>}(arguments);
$object::{<method_name>}(arguments);
See it in an example:
class Foo
{
public function another(): string
{
return "something";
}
}
$bar = "another thing";
(new Something())->{explode(" ", $bar)[0]}(); // something
Dynamic Method Call: The Array Syntax
A more elegant way added in PHP7 is the following:
[<object>, <method_name>](arguments);
[<class_name>, <method_name>](arguments); // Static calls only
As an example:
class Foo
{
public function nonStaticCall()
{
echo "Non-static call";
}
public static function staticCall()
{
echo "Static call";
}
}
$x = new X();
[$x, "non" . "StaticCall"](); // Non-static call
[$x, "static" . "Call"](); // Static call
Note: The benefit of using this method over the previous one is that, you don't care about the call type (i.e. whether it's static or not).
Note: If you care about performance (and micro-optimizations), don't use this method. As I tested, this method is really slower than other methods (more than 10 times).
Extra Example: Using Anonymous Classes
Making things a bit complicated, you could use a combination of anonymous classes and the features above:
$bar = "SomeThing";
echo (new class {
public function something()
{
return 512;
}
})->{strtolower($bar)}(); // 512
TL;DR (Conclusion)
Generally, in PHP7, using the following forms are all possible:
// Everything inside `<something>` brackets means one or more expressions
// to form something
// Dynamic function call via function name
(<function_name>)(arguments);
// Dynamic function call on a callable property
($object->{<property_name>})(arguments);
// Dynamic method call on an object
$object->{<method_name>}(arguments);
$object::{<method_name>}(arguments);
// Dynamic method call on a dynamically-generated object
(<object>)->{<method_name>}(arguments);
(<object>)::{<method_name>}(arguments);
// Dynamic method call, statically
ClassName::{<method_name>}(arguments);
(<class_name>)::{<method_name>}(arguments);
// Dynamic method call, array-like (no different between static
// and non-static calls
[<object>, <method_name>](arguments);
// Dynamic method call, array-like, statically
[<class_name>, <method_name>](arguments);
Special thanks to this PHP talk.
Yes, it is possible:
function foo($msg) {
echo $msg."<br />";
}
$var1 = "foo";
$var1("testing 1,2,3");
Source: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/php/2001/05/17/php_foundations.html?page=2
As already mentioned, there are a few ways to achieve this with possibly the safest method being call_user_func() or if you must you can also go down the route of $function_name(). It is possible to pass arguments using both of these methods as so
$function_name = 'foobar';
$function_name(arg1, arg2);
call_user_func_array($function_name, array(arg1, arg2));
If the function you are calling belongs to an object you can still use either of these
$object->$function_name(arg1, arg2);
call_user_func_array(array($object, $function_name), array(arg1, arg2));
However if you are going to use the $function_name() method it may be a good idea to test for the existence of the function if the name is in any way dynamic
if(method_exists($object, $function_name))
{
$object->$function_name(arg1, arg2);
}
A few years late, but this is the best manner now imho:
$x = (new ReflectionFunction("foo"))->getClosure();
$x();
In case someone else is brought here by google because they were trying to use a variable for a method within a class, the below is a code sample which will actually work. None of the above worked for my situation. The key difference is the & in the declaration of $c = & new... and &$c being passed in call_user_func.
My specific case is when implementing someone's code having to do with colors and two member methods lighten() and darken() from the csscolor.php class. For whatever reason, I wanted to have the same code be able to call lighten or darken rather than select it out with logic. This may be the result of my stubbornness to not just use if-else or to change the code calling this method.
$lightdark="lighten"; // or optionally can be darken
$color="fcc"; // a hex color
$percent=0.15;
include_once("csscolor.php");
$c = & new CSS_Color($color);
$rtn=call_user_func( array(&$c,$lightdark),$color,$percent);
Note that trying anything with $c->{...} didn't work. Upon perusing the reader-contributed content at the bottom of php.net's page on call_user_func, I was able to piece together the above. Also, note that $params as an array didn't work for me:
// This doesn't work:
$params=Array($color,$percent);
$rtn=call_user_func( array(&$c,$lightdark),$params);
This above attempt would give a warning about the method expecting a 2nd argument (percent).
For the sake of completeness, you can also use eval():
$functionName = "foo()";
eval($functionName);
However, call_user_func() is the proper way.
Dynamic function names and namespaces
Just to add a point about dynamic function names when using namespaces.
If you're using namespaces, the following won't work except if your function is in the global namespace:
namespace greetings;
function hello()
{
// do something
}
$myvar = "hello";
$myvar(); // interpreted as "\hello();"
What to do?
You have to use call_user_func() instead:
// if hello() is in the current namespace
call_user_func(__NAMESPACE__.'\\'.$myvar);
// if hello() is in another namespace
call_user_func('mynamespace\\'.$myvar);
Complementing the answer of #Chris K if you want to call an object's method, you can call it using a single variable with the help of a closure:
function get_method($object, $method){
return function() use($object, $method){
$args = func_get_args();
return call_user_func_array(array($object, $method), $args);
};
}
class test{
function echo_this($text){
echo $text;
}
}
$test = new test();
$echo = get_method($test, 'echo_this');
$echo('Hello'); //Output is "Hello"
I posted another example here
Use the call_user_func function.
What I learnt from this question and the answers. Thanks all!
Let say I have these variables and functions:
$functionName1 = "sayHello";
$functionName2 = "sayHelloTo";
$functionName3 = "saySomethingTo";
$friend = "John";
$datas = array(
"something"=>"how are you?",
"to"=>"Sarah"
);
function sayHello()
{
echo "Hello!";
}
function sayHelloTo($to)
{
echo "Dear $to, hello!";
}
function saySomethingTo($something, $to)
{
echo "Dear $to, $something";
}
To call function without arguments
// Calling sayHello()
call_user_func($functionName1);
Hello!
To call function with 1 argument
// Calling sayHelloTo("John")
call_user_func($functionName2, $friend);
Dear John, hello!
To call function with 1 or more arguments
This will be useful if you are dynamically calling your functions and each function have different number of arguments. This is my case that I have been looking for (and solved). call_user_func_array is the key
// You can add your arguments
// 1. statically by hard-code,
$arguments[0] = "how are you?"; // my $something
$arguments[1] = "Sarah"; // my $to
// 2. OR dynamically using foreach
$arguments = NULL;
foreach($datas as $data)
{
$arguments[] = $data;
}
// Calling saySomethingTo("how are you?", "Sarah")
call_user_func_array($functionName3, $arguments);
Dear Sarah, how are you?
Yay bye!
If you were in a object context trying to call a function dynamically please try something like this code bellow:
$this->{$variable}();
Following code can help to write dynamic function in PHP.
now the function name can be dynamically change by variable '$current_page'.
$current_page = 'home_page';
$function = #${$current_page . '_page_versions'};
$function = function() {
echo 'current page';
};
$function();
The easiest way to call a function safely using the name stored in a variable is,
//I want to call method deploy that is stored in functionname
$functionname = 'deploy';
$retVal = {$functionname}('parameters');
I have used like below to create migration tables in Laravel dynamically,
foreach(App\Test::$columns as $name => $column){
$table->{$column[0]}($name);
}
Considering some of the excellent answers given here, sometimes you need to be precise.
For example.
if a function has a return value eg (boolean,array,string,int,float
e.t.c).
if the function has no return value check
if the function exists
Let's look at its credit to some of the answers given.
Class Cars{
function carMake(){
return 'Toyota';
}
function carMakeYear(){
return 2020;
}
function estimatedPriceInDollar{
return 1500.89;
}
function colorList(){
return array("Black","Gold","Silver","Blue");
}
function carUsage(){
return array("Private","Commercial","Government");
}
function getCar(){
echo "Toyota Venza 2020 model private estimated price is 1500 USD";
}
}
We want to check if method exists and call it dynamically.
$method = "color List";
$class = new Cars();
//If the function have return value;
$arrayColor = method_exists($class, str_replace(' ', "", $method)) ? call_user_func(array($this, $obj)) : [];
//If the function have no return value e.g echo,die,print e.t.c
$method = "get Car";
if(method_exists($class, str_replace(' ', "", $method))){
call_user_func(array($class, $method))
}
Thanks
One unconventional approach, that came to my mind is, unless you are generating the whole code through some super ultra autonomous AI which writes itself, there are high chances that the functions which you want to "dynamically" call, are already defined in your code base. So why not just check for the string and do the infamous ifelse dance to summon the ...you get my point.
eg.
if($functionName == 'foo'){
foo();
} else if($functionName == 'bar'){
bar();
}
Even switch-case can be used if you don't like the bland taste of ifelse ladder.
I understand that there are cases where the "dynamically calling the function" would be an absolute necessity (Like some recursive logic which modifies itself). But most of the everyday trivial use-cases can just be dodged.
It weeds out a lot of uncertainty from your application, while giving you a chance to execute a fallback function if the string doesn't match any of the available functions' definition. IMHO.
I dont know why u have to use that, doesnt sound so good to me at all, but if there are only a small amount of functions, you could use a if/elseif construct.
I dont know if a direct solution is possible.
something like
$foo = "bar";
$test = "foo";
echo $$test;
should return bar, you can try around but i dont think this will work for functions
Assume this class code:
class Foo {
function method() {
echo 'works';
}
}
Is there any way to store a reference to the method method of a Foo instance?
I'm just experimenting and fiddling around, my goal is checking whether PHP allows to call $FooInstance->method() without writing $FooInstance-> every time. I know I could write a function wrapper for this, but I'm more interested in getting a reference to the instance method.
For example, this pseudo-code would theoretically store $foo->method in the $method variable:
$foo = new Foo();
$method = $foo->method; //Undefined property: Foo::$method
$method();
Apparently, as method is a method and I'm not calling it with () the interpreter thinks I'm looking for a property thus this doesn't work.
I've read through Returning References but the examples only show how to return references to variables, not methods.
Therefore, I've adapted my code to store an anonymous function in a variable and return it:
class Foo {
function &method() {
$fn = function() {
echo 'works';
};
return $fn;
}
}
$foo = new Foo();
$method = &$foo->method();
$method();
This works, but is rather ugly. Also, there's no neat way to call it a single time, as this seems to require storing the returned function in a variable prior to calling it: $foo->method()(); and ($foo->method())(); are syntax errors.
Also, I've tried returning the anonymous function directly without storing it in a variable, but then I get the following notice:
Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference
Does this mean that returning/storing a reference to a class instance method is impossible/discouraged or am I overlooking something?
Update: I don't mind adding a getter if necessary, the goal is just getting a reference to the method. I've even tried:
class Foo {
var $fn = function() {
echo 'works';
};
function &method() {
return $this->fn;
}
}
But from the unexpected 'function' (T_FUNCTION) error I'd believe that PHP wisely doesn't allow properties to store functions.
I'm starting to believe that my goal isn't easily achievable without the use of ugly hacks as eval().
It is. You have to use an array, with two values: the class instance (or string of the class name if you are calling a static method) and the method name as a string. This is documented on the Callbacks Man page:
A method of an instantiated object is passed as an array containing an object at index 0 and the method name at index 1.
Demo (Codepad):
<?php
class Something {
public function abc() {
echo 'called';
}
}
$some = new Something;
$meth = array($some, 'abc');
$meth(); // 'called'
Note this is also works with the built-ins that require callbacks (Codepad):
class Filter {
public function doFilter($value) {
return $value !== 3;
}
}
$filter = new Filter;
$test = array(1,2,3,4,5);
var_dump(array_filter($test, array($filter, 'doFilter'))); // 'array(1,2,4,5)'
And for static methods -- note the 'Filter' instead of an instance of a class as the first element in the array (Codepad):
class Filter {
public static function doFilter($value) {
return $value !== 3;
}
}
$test = array(1,2,3,4,5);
var_dump(array_filter($test, array('Filter', 'doFilter'))); // 'array(1,2,4,5)'
// -------- or -----------
var_dump(array_filter($test, 'Filter::doFilter')); // As of PHP 5.2.3
Yes, you can. PHP has a "callable" pseudo-type, which is, in fact, either just a string or an array. Several functions (usort comes to mind) accept a parameter of the "callback" type: in fact, they just want a function name, or an object-method pair.
That's right, strings are callable:
$fn = "strlen";
$fn("string"); // returns 6
As mentioned, it's possible to use an array as a callback, too. In that case, the first element has to be an object, and the second argument must be a method name:
$obj = new Foo();
$fn = array($obj, "method");
$fn(); // calls $obj->method()
Previously, you had to use call_user_func to call them, but syntax sugar in recent versions make it possible to perform the call straight on variables.
You can read more on the "callable" documentation page.
No, as far as I know it's not possible to store a reference to a method in PHP. Storing object / class name and a method name in an array works, but it's just an array without any special meaning. You can play with the array as you please, for example:
$ref = [new My_Class(), "x"];
// all is fine here ...
$ref();
// but this also valid, now the 'reference' points to My_Other_Class::x()
// do you expect real reference to behave like this?
$ref[0] = new My_Other_Class();
$ref();
// this is also valid syntax, but it throws fatal error
$ref[0] = 1;
$ref();
// let's assume My_Class::y() is a protected method, this won't work outside My_Class
$ref = [new My_Class(), 'y'];
$ref();
this is prone to error as you loose syntax checking due to storing the method name as string.
you can't pass reliably a reference to a private or a protected method this way (unless you call the reference from a context that already has proper access to the method).
Personally I prefer to use lambdas:
$ref = function() use($my_object) { $my_object->x(); }
If you do this from inside $my_object it gets less clunky thanks to access to $this:
$ref = function() { $this->x(); }
this works with protected / private methods
syntax checking works in IDE (less bugs)
unfortunately it's less concise
I have a string containing the class name and I wish to get a constant and call a (static) method from that class.
<?php
$myclass = 'b'; // My class I wish to use
$x = new x($myclass); // Create an instance of x
$response = $x->runMethod(); // Call "runMethod" which calls my desired method
// This is my class I use to access the other classes
class x {
private $myclass = NULL;
public function __construct ( $myclass ) {
if(is_string($myclass)) {
// Assuming the input has a valid class name
$this->myclass = $myclass;
}
}
public function runMethod() {
// Get the selected constant here
print $this->myclass::CONSTANT;
// Call the selected method here
return $this->myclass::method('input string');
}
}
// These are my class(es) I want to access
abstract class a {
const CONSTANT = 'this is my constant';
public static function method ( $str ) {
return $str;
}
}
class b extends a {
const CONSTANT = 'this is my new constant';
public static function method ( $str ) {
return 'this is my method, and this is my string: '. $str;
}
}
?>
As I expected (more or less), using $variable::CONSTANT or $variable::method(); doesn't work.
Before asking what I have tried; I've tried so many things I basically forgot.
What's the best approach to do this? Thanks in advance.
To access the constant, use constant():
constant( $this->myClass.'::CONSTANT' );
Be advised: If you are working with namespaces, you need to specifically add your namespace to the string even if you call constant() from the same namespace!
For the call, you'll have to use call_user_func():
call_user_func( array( $this->myclass, 'method' ) );
However: this is all not very efficient, so you might want to take another look at your object hierarchy design. There might be a better way to achieve the desired result, using inheritance etc.
in php 7 you can use this code
echo 'my class name'::$b;
or
#Uncomment this lines if you're the input($className and $constName) is safe.
$reg = '/^[a-zA-Z_\x80-\xff][a-zA-Z0-9_\x80-\xff]*$/';
if(preg_match($reg,$className) !== 1 || preg_match($reg,$constName) !== 1)
throw new \Exception('Oh, is it an attack?');
$value = eval("return $className::$constName;");
You can achieve it by setting a temporary variable. Not the most elegant way but it works.
public function runMethod() {
// Temporary variable
$myclass = $this->myclass;
// Get the selected constant here
print $myclass::CONSTANT;
// Call the selected method here
return $myclass::method('input string');
}
I guess it's to do with the ambiguity of the ::, at least that what the error message is hinting at (PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM)
Use call_user_func to call static method:
call_user_func(array($className, $methodName), $parameter);
Classes defined as abstract may not be instantiated, and any class that contains at least one abstract method must also be abstract. Methods defined as abstract simply declare the method's signature - they cannot define the implementation.
When inheriting from an abstract class, all methods marked abstract in the parent's class declaration must be defined by the child; additionally, these methods must be defined with the same (or a less restricted) visibility. For example, if the abstract method is defined as protected, the function implementation must be defined as either protected or public, but not private. Furthermore the signatures of the methods must match, i.e. the type hints and the number of required arguments must be the same. This also applies to constructors as of PHP 5.4. Before 5.4 constructor signatures could differ.
Refer to http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.abstract.php
This might just be tangential to the subject but, while searching for my own issue I found that the accepted answer pointed me in the right direction, so I wanted to share my problem & solution in case someone else might be stuck in a similar fashion.
I was using the PDO class and was building some error options from an ini config file. I needed them in an associative array in the form: PDO::OPTION_KEY => PDO::OPTION_VALUE, but it was of course failing because I was trying to build the array with just PDO::$key => PDO::$value.
The solution (inspired from the accepted answer):
$config['options'] += [constant('PDO::'.$key) => constant('PDO::'.$option)];
where everything works if you concatenate the class name and the Scope Resolution Operator as a string with the variable and get the constant value of the resulting string through the constant function (more here).
Thank you and I hope this helps someone else!
This question already has an answer here:
How to call the constructor with call_user_func_array in PHP
(1 answer)
Closed 7 years ago.
I have searched many a page of Google results as well as here on stackoverflow but cannot find a solution that seems to fit my situation. I appear to have but one last snag in the function I am trying to build, which uses call_user_func_array to dynamically create objects.
The catchable fatal error I am getting is Object of class Product could not be converted to string. When the error occurs, in the log I get five of these (one for each argument): PHP Warning: Missing argument 1 for Product::__construct(), before the catchable fatal error.
This is the code of the function:
public static function SelectAll($class, $table, $sort_field, $sort_order = "ASC")
{
/* First, the function performs a MySQL query using the provided arguments. */
$query = "SELECT * FROM " .$table. " ORDER BY " .$sort_field. " " .$sort_order;
$result = mysql_query($query);
/* Next, the function dynamically gathers the appropriate number and names of properties. */
$num_fields = mysql_num_fields($result);
for($i=0; $i < ($num_fields); $i++)
{
$fetch = mysql_fetch_field($result, $i);
$properties[$i] = $fetch->name;
}
/* Finally, the function produces and returns an array of constructed objects.*/
while($row = mysql_fetch_assoc($result))
{
for($i=0; $i < ($num_fields); $i++)
{
$args[$i] = $row[$properties[$i]];
}
$array[] = call_user_func_array (new $class, $args);
}
return $array;
}
Now, if I comment out the call_user_func_array line and replace it with this:
$array[] = new $class($args[0],$args[1],$args[2],$args[3],$args[4]);
The page loads as it should, and populates the table I am building. So everything is absolutely functional until I try to actually use my $args array within call_user_func_array.
Is there some subtle detail about calling that array that I am missing? I read the PHP manual for call_user_func_array once, and then some, and examples on that page seemed to show people just building an array and calling it for the second argument. What could I be doing wrong?
You can't call the constructor of $class like this:
call_user_func_array (new $class, $args);
That's no valid callback as first parameter. Let's pick this apart:
call_user_func_array (new $class, $args);
Is the same as
$obj = new $class;
call_user_func_array ($obj, $args);
As you can see, the constructor of $class has been already called before call_user_func_array comes into action. As it has no parameters, you see this error message:
Missing argument 1 for Product::__construct()
Next to that, $obj is of type object. A valid callback must be either a string or an array (or exceptionally a very special object: Closure, but that's out of discussion here, I only name it for completeness).
As $obj is an object and not a valid callback, so you see the PHP error message:
Object of class Product could not be converted to string.
PHP tries to convert the object to string, which it does not allow.
So as you can see, you can't easily create a callback for a constructor, as the object yet not exists. Perhaps that's why you were not able to look it up in the manual easily.
Constructors need some special dealing here: If you need to pass variable arguments to a class constructor of a not-yet initialize object, you can use the ReflectionClass to do this:
$ref = new ReflectionClass($class);
$new = $ref->newInstanceArgs($args);
See ReflectionClass::newInstanceArgs
Not possible using call_user_func_array(), because (as the name suggest) it calls functions/methods, but is not intended to create objects, Use ReflectionClass
$refClass = new ReflectionClass($class);
$object = $refClass->newInstanceArgs($args);
Another (more design-based) solution is a static factory method
class MyClass () {
public static function create ($args) {
return new self($args[0],$args[1],$args[2],$args[3],$args[4]);
}
}
and then just
$object = $class::create($args);
In my eyes it's cleaner, because less magic and more control
I use this for singleton factory pattern, becouse the ReflectionClass brokes the dependence tree, I hate the use of eval but its the only way to i find to simplificate the use of singleton pattern to inject mockObjects whith PHPUnit whitout open the class methods to that injection, BE CAREFULL WHITH THE DATA WHAT YOU PASS TO eval FUNCTION!!!!!!!! YOU MUST BE SURE THAT IS CLEANED AND FILTERED!!!
abstract class Singleton{
private static $instance=array();//collection of singleton objects instances
protected function __construct(){}//to allow call to extended constructor only from dependence tree
private function __clone(){}//to disallow duplicate
private function __wakeup(){}//comment this if you want to mock the object whith php unit jejeje
//AND HERE WE GO!!!
public static function getInstance(){
$a=get_called_class();
if(!array_key_exists($a, self::$instance)){
if(func_num_args()){
/**HERE IS THE CODE **//
$args=func_get_args();
$str='self::$instance[$a]=new $a(';
for($i=0;$i<count($args);$i++){
$str.=(($i)?",":"").'$args['.$i.']';
}
eval($str.");");//DANGER, BE CAREFULLY...we only use this code to inject MockObjects in testing...to another use you will use a normal method to configure the SingletonObject
/*--------------------------*/
}else{
self::$instance[$a]=new $a();
}
}
return self::$instance[$a];
}
}
And to use that:
class MyClass extends Singleton{
protected function __construct(MyDependInjection $injection){
//here i use the args like a normal class but the method IS PROTECTED!!!
}
}
to instanciate the object:
$myVar= MyClass::getInstance($objetFromClassMyDependInjection);
it calls the constructor whith the args I pased. i know that i can get the same result extending the static method getInstance but to teamworking its more easy to use this way
I need to be able to call a function, but the function name is stored in a variable, is this possible? e.g:
function foo ()
{
//code here
}
function bar ()
{
//code here
}
$functionName = "foo";
// I need to call the function based on what is $functionName
$functionName() or call_user_func($functionName)
My favorite version is the inline version:
${"variableName"} = 12;
$className->{"propertyName"};
$className->{"methodName"}();
StaticClass::${"propertyName"};
StaticClass::{"methodName"}();
You can place variables or expressions inside the brackets too!
Solution: Use PHP7
Note: For a summarized version, see TL;DR at the end of the answer.
Old Methods
Update: One of the old methods explained here has been removed. Refer to other answers for explanation on other methods, it isn't covered here. By the way, if this answer doesn't help you, you should return upgrading your stuff. PHP 5.6 support has ended in January 2019 (now even PHP 7.2 and 7.3 are not being supported). See supported versions for more information.
As others mentioned, in PHP5 (and also in newer versions like PHP7) we could use variables as function names, use call_user_func() and call_user_func_array(), etc.
New Methods
As of PHP7, there are new ways introduced:
Note: Everything inside <something> brackets means one or more expressions to form something, e.g. <function_name> means expressions forming a function name.
Dynamic Function Call: Function Name On-the-fly
We can form a function name inside parentheses in just one go:
(<function_name>)(arguments);
For example:
function something(): string
{
return "something";
}
$bar = "some_thing";
(str_replace("_", "", $bar))(); // something
// Possible, too; but generally, not recommended, because makes your
// code more complicated
(str_replace("_", "", $bar))()();
Note: Although removing the parentheses around str_replace() is not an error, putting parentheses makes code more readable. However, you cannot do that sometimes, e.g. while using . operator. To be consistent, I recommend you to put the parentheses always.
Dynamic Function Call: Callable Property
A useful example would be in the context of objects: If you have stored a callable in a property, you have to call it this way:
($object->{<property_name>})();
As a simple example:
// Suppose we're in a class method context
($this->eventHandler)();
Obviously, calling it as $this->eventHandler() is plain wrong: By that you mean calling a method named eventHandler.
Dynamic Method Call: Method Name On-the-fly
Just like dynamic function calls, we can do the same way with method calls, surrounded by curly braces instead of parentheses (for extra forms, navigate to TL;DR section):
$object->{<method_name>}(arguments);
$object::{<method_name>}(arguments);
See it in an example:
class Foo
{
public function another(): string
{
return "something";
}
}
$bar = "another thing";
(new Something())->{explode(" ", $bar)[0]}(); // something
Dynamic Method Call: The Array Syntax
A more elegant way added in PHP7 is the following:
[<object>, <method_name>](arguments);
[<class_name>, <method_name>](arguments); // Static calls only
As an example:
class Foo
{
public function nonStaticCall()
{
echo "Non-static call";
}
public static function staticCall()
{
echo "Static call";
}
}
$x = new X();
[$x, "non" . "StaticCall"](); // Non-static call
[$x, "static" . "Call"](); // Static call
Note: The benefit of using this method over the previous one is that, you don't care about the call type (i.e. whether it's static or not).
Note: If you care about performance (and micro-optimizations), don't use this method. As I tested, this method is really slower than other methods (more than 10 times).
Extra Example: Using Anonymous Classes
Making things a bit complicated, you could use a combination of anonymous classes and the features above:
$bar = "SomeThing";
echo (new class {
public function something()
{
return 512;
}
})->{strtolower($bar)}(); // 512
TL;DR (Conclusion)
Generally, in PHP7, using the following forms are all possible:
// Everything inside `<something>` brackets means one or more expressions
// to form something
// Dynamic function call via function name
(<function_name>)(arguments);
// Dynamic function call on a callable property
($object->{<property_name>})(arguments);
// Dynamic method call on an object
$object->{<method_name>}(arguments);
$object::{<method_name>}(arguments);
// Dynamic method call on a dynamically-generated object
(<object>)->{<method_name>}(arguments);
(<object>)::{<method_name>}(arguments);
// Dynamic method call, statically
ClassName::{<method_name>}(arguments);
(<class_name>)::{<method_name>}(arguments);
// Dynamic method call, array-like (no different between static
// and non-static calls
[<object>, <method_name>](arguments);
// Dynamic method call, array-like, statically
[<class_name>, <method_name>](arguments);
Special thanks to this PHP talk.
Yes, it is possible:
function foo($msg) {
echo $msg."<br />";
}
$var1 = "foo";
$var1("testing 1,2,3");
Source: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/php/2001/05/17/php_foundations.html?page=2
As already mentioned, there are a few ways to achieve this with possibly the safest method being call_user_func() or if you must you can also go down the route of $function_name(). It is possible to pass arguments using both of these methods as so
$function_name = 'foobar';
$function_name(arg1, arg2);
call_user_func_array($function_name, array(arg1, arg2));
If the function you are calling belongs to an object you can still use either of these
$object->$function_name(arg1, arg2);
call_user_func_array(array($object, $function_name), array(arg1, arg2));
However if you are going to use the $function_name() method it may be a good idea to test for the existence of the function if the name is in any way dynamic
if(method_exists($object, $function_name))
{
$object->$function_name(arg1, arg2);
}
A few years late, but this is the best manner now imho:
$x = (new ReflectionFunction("foo"))->getClosure();
$x();
In case someone else is brought here by google because they were trying to use a variable for a method within a class, the below is a code sample which will actually work. None of the above worked for my situation. The key difference is the & in the declaration of $c = & new... and &$c being passed in call_user_func.
My specific case is when implementing someone's code having to do with colors and two member methods lighten() and darken() from the csscolor.php class. For whatever reason, I wanted to have the same code be able to call lighten or darken rather than select it out with logic. This may be the result of my stubbornness to not just use if-else or to change the code calling this method.
$lightdark="lighten"; // or optionally can be darken
$color="fcc"; // a hex color
$percent=0.15;
include_once("csscolor.php");
$c = & new CSS_Color($color);
$rtn=call_user_func( array(&$c,$lightdark),$color,$percent);
Note that trying anything with $c->{...} didn't work. Upon perusing the reader-contributed content at the bottom of php.net's page on call_user_func, I was able to piece together the above. Also, note that $params as an array didn't work for me:
// This doesn't work:
$params=Array($color,$percent);
$rtn=call_user_func( array(&$c,$lightdark),$params);
This above attempt would give a warning about the method expecting a 2nd argument (percent).
For the sake of completeness, you can also use eval():
$functionName = "foo()";
eval($functionName);
However, call_user_func() is the proper way.
Dynamic function names and namespaces
Just to add a point about dynamic function names when using namespaces.
If you're using namespaces, the following won't work except if your function is in the global namespace:
namespace greetings;
function hello()
{
// do something
}
$myvar = "hello";
$myvar(); // interpreted as "\hello();"
What to do?
You have to use call_user_func() instead:
// if hello() is in the current namespace
call_user_func(__NAMESPACE__.'\\'.$myvar);
// if hello() is in another namespace
call_user_func('mynamespace\\'.$myvar);
Complementing the answer of #Chris K if you want to call an object's method, you can call it using a single variable with the help of a closure:
function get_method($object, $method){
return function() use($object, $method){
$args = func_get_args();
return call_user_func_array(array($object, $method), $args);
};
}
class test{
function echo_this($text){
echo $text;
}
}
$test = new test();
$echo = get_method($test, 'echo_this');
$echo('Hello'); //Output is "Hello"
I posted another example here
Use the call_user_func function.
What I learnt from this question and the answers. Thanks all!
Let say I have these variables and functions:
$functionName1 = "sayHello";
$functionName2 = "sayHelloTo";
$functionName3 = "saySomethingTo";
$friend = "John";
$datas = array(
"something"=>"how are you?",
"to"=>"Sarah"
);
function sayHello()
{
echo "Hello!";
}
function sayHelloTo($to)
{
echo "Dear $to, hello!";
}
function saySomethingTo($something, $to)
{
echo "Dear $to, $something";
}
To call function without arguments
// Calling sayHello()
call_user_func($functionName1);
Hello!
To call function with 1 argument
// Calling sayHelloTo("John")
call_user_func($functionName2, $friend);
Dear John, hello!
To call function with 1 or more arguments
This will be useful if you are dynamically calling your functions and each function have different number of arguments. This is my case that I have been looking for (and solved). call_user_func_array is the key
// You can add your arguments
// 1. statically by hard-code,
$arguments[0] = "how are you?"; // my $something
$arguments[1] = "Sarah"; // my $to
// 2. OR dynamically using foreach
$arguments = NULL;
foreach($datas as $data)
{
$arguments[] = $data;
}
// Calling saySomethingTo("how are you?", "Sarah")
call_user_func_array($functionName3, $arguments);
Dear Sarah, how are you?
Yay bye!
If you were in a object context trying to call a function dynamically please try something like this code bellow:
$this->{$variable}();
The easiest way to call a function safely using the name stored in a variable is,
//I want to call method deploy that is stored in functionname
$functionname = 'deploy';
$retVal = {$functionname}('parameters');
I have used like below to create migration tables in Laravel dynamically,
foreach(App\Test::$columns as $name => $column){
$table->{$column[0]}($name);
}
Following code can help to write dynamic function in PHP.
now the function name can be dynamically change by variable '$current_page'.
$current_page = 'home_page';
$function = #${$current_page . '_page_versions'};
$function = function() {
echo 'current page';
};
$function();
Considering some of the excellent answers given here, sometimes you need to be precise.
For example.
if a function has a return value eg (boolean,array,string,int,float
e.t.c).
if the function has no return value check
if the function exists
Let's look at its credit to some of the answers given.
Class Cars{
function carMake(){
return 'Toyota';
}
function carMakeYear(){
return 2020;
}
function estimatedPriceInDollar{
return 1500.89;
}
function colorList(){
return array("Black","Gold","Silver","Blue");
}
function carUsage(){
return array("Private","Commercial","Government");
}
function getCar(){
echo "Toyota Venza 2020 model private estimated price is 1500 USD";
}
}
We want to check if method exists and call it dynamically.
$method = "color List";
$class = new Cars();
//If the function have return value;
$arrayColor = method_exists($class, str_replace(' ', "", $method)) ? call_user_func(array($this, $obj)) : [];
//If the function have no return value e.g echo,die,print e.t.c
$method = "get Car";
if(method_exists($class, str_replace(' ', "", $method))){
call_user_func(array($class, $method))
}
Thanks
One unconventional approach, that came to my mind is, unless you are generating the whole code through some super ultra autonomous AI which writes itself, there are high chances that the functions which you want to "dynamically" call, are already defined in your code base. So why not just check for the string and do the infamous ifelse dance to summon the ...you get my point.
eg.
if($functionName == 'foo'){
foo();
} else if($functionName == 'bar'){
bar();
}
Even switch-case can be used if you don't like the bland taste of ifelse ladder.
I understand that there are cases where the "dynamically calling the function" would be an absolute necessity (Like some recursive logic which modifies itself). But most of the everyday trivial use-cases can just be dodged.
It weeds out a lot of uncertainty from your application, while giving you a chance to execute a fallback function if the string doesn't match any of the available functions' definition. IMHO.
I dont know why u have to use that, doesnt sound so good to me at all, but if there are only a small amount of functions, you could use a if/elseif construct.
I dont know if a direct solution is possible.
something like
$foo = "bar";
$test = "foo";
echo $$test;
should return bar, you can try around but i dont think this will work for functions