Currently I have an scheduler task, but I want to use function from my extbase repository (in the same extension).
I keep getting "PHP Fatal error: Call to a member function add() on a non-object", no matter how I try to include my repo or controller from extbase.
My SampleTask.php:
namespace TYPO3\ExtName\Task;
class SampleTask extends \TYPO3\CMS\Scheduler\Task\AbstractTask {
public function execute() {
$controller = \TYPO3\CMS\Core\Utility\GeneralUtility::makeInstance('\TYPO3\ExtName\Controller\SampleController');
$new = new \TYPO3\ExtName\Domain\Model\Sample;
$new->setName('test');
$controller->createAction($new);
}
}
And correctly defined in my ext_localconf.php
Can someone explain me how I can access my Repository (or controller) -extbase- from my SampleTask.php.
Using TYPO3 6.2.
Thank you.
You are getting this php error, because you instanciated your controller with makeInstance(). If you use makeInstance to get the objectManager (\TYPO3\CMS\Extbase\Object\ObjectManager) and use $objectManager->get('TYPO3\ExtName\Controller\SampleController'), the dependency injection inside your controller will work (e.g. your repository).
But you can use the objectManager to get the repository right away, so you dont have to call a controller action:
Something like this:
namespace TYPO3\ExtName\Task;
use TYPO3\CMS\Core\Utility\GeneralUtility;
use TYPO3\CMS\Extbase\Object\ObjectManager;
use TYPO3\ExtName\Domain\Repository\SampleRepository;
use TYPO3\ExtName\Domain\Model\Sample;
use TYPO3\CMS\Extbase\Persistence\PersistenceManagerInterface;
class SampleTask extends \TYPO3\CMS\Scheduler\Task\AbstractTask {
public function execute() {
$objectManager = GeneralUtility::makeInstance(ObjectManager::class);
$sampleRepository= $objectManager->get(SampleRepository::class);
$new = new Sample();
$new->setName('test');
$sampleRepository->add($new);
$objectManager->get(PersistenceManagerInterface::class)->persistAll();
}
}
Related
I want to swap out my client call or better i try to make a wrapper around this package, so i dont have to write this everytime, so i made a new ServiceProvider which should call
// Create a new client,
// so i dont have to type this in every Method
$client = new ShopwareClient('url', 'user', 'api_key');
on every request i make.
// Later after the Client is called i can make a Request
return $client->getArticleQuery()->findAll();
SwapiServiceProvider
<?php
namespace Chris\Swapi;
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
use LeadCommerce\Shopware\SDK\ShopwareClient;
class SwapiServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
/**
* Perform post-registration booting of services.
*
* #return void
*/
public function boot()
{
}
/**
* Register any package services.
*
* #return void
*/
public function register()
{
$this->app->singleton(ShopwareClient::class, function () {
return new ShopwareClient(
env('SHOPWARE_URL'),
env('SHOPWARE_USER'),
env('SHOPWARE_KEY')
);
});
}
}
My Class
...
use LeadCommerce\Shopware\SDK\ShopwareClient as Shopware;
class Swapi
{
public function fetchAllArticles(Shopware $shopware)
{
return $shopware->getArticleQuery()->findAll();
}
}
Testing
I just call it in my routes.php for testing
use Chris\Swapi\Swapi;
Route::get('swapi', function () {
// Since this is a package i also made the Facade
return Swapi::fetchAllArticles();
});
But i get everytime the error
FatalThrowableError in Swapi.php line 18: Type error: Argument 1
passed to Chris\Swapi\Swapi::fetchAllArticles() must be an instance of
LeadCommerce\Shopware\SDK\ShopwareClient, none given, called in
/Users/chris/Desktop/code/swapi/app/Http/routes.php on line 7
So i am asking why this
return new ShopwareClient(
env('SHOPWARE_URL'),
env('SHOPWARE_USER'),
env('SHOPWARE_KEY')
);
is not called everytime i call a method e.g $shopware->getArticleQuery()->findAll();
Does anyone know why?
I think there might be some confusion here about Laravel's IoC. When you use return Swapi::fetchAllArticles();, Laravel doesn't know what you are doing because you haven't used the container to build out the Swapi class (even though you have registered one with the container) nor do you have a facade built to access it in that manner. Otherwise PHP is going to complain because your function isn't static.
I just wrote this code and verified that it works as far as Laravel putting it all together.
In my service provider, my register function was this...
public function register()
{
$this->app->singleton('swapi', function($app) {
return new SwapiRepository(
new ShopwareClient(
env('SHOPWARE_URL'),
env('SHOPWARE_USER'),
env('SHOPWARE_KEY')
)
);
});
}
Keep in mind, swapi is really just a key the container will use to find the actual class. There's no need to pass in the entire qualified class name when you can keep it simple and easy.
My SwapiRepository which is really the wrapper for the Shopware SDK.
use LeadCommerce\Shopware\SDK\ShopwareClient;
class SwapiRepository
{
protected $client;
public function __construct(ShopwareClient $client)
{
$this->client = $client;
}
public function fetchAllArticles()
{
return $this->client->getArticleQuery()->findAll();
}
}
At this point, you are basically done. Just add App\Providers\SwapiServiceProvider::class, in the providers array (which you probably have done already) in app/config.php and use your wrapper like so...
$swapi = app('swapi');
$swapi->fetchAllArticles();
Or you can have Laravel inject it into other classes as long as Laravel is building said class.
If you want to build out a facade for this to save yourself a line of code each time you want to use this or for snytactical sugar...
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Facade;
class Swapi extends Facade
{
protected static function getFacadeAccessor() { return 'swapi'; }
}
Make sure to update your aliases array in app/config.php so that it contains 'Swapi' => App\Repositories\Swapi::class,
And finally you should be able to use it like so...
Swapi::fetchAllArticles();
Please note your namespaces are different than mine so you may need to replace mine with yours. You should also now be able to easily inject Swapi into other classes and even method injected into your controllers where needed.
Just remember if you do that though, make sure you are grabbing instances of those classes from Laravel's service container using the app() function. If you try to build them out yourself using new SomeClass, then you have the responsibility of injecting any dependencies yourself.
I know that this question was asked so many times, but none of answers helped me.
I'm getting exception in Laravel 5
BindingResolutionException in Container.php line 785:
Target [App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface] is not instantiable.
What I've done without success:
Register App\Providers\AppRepositoryProvider in app.php providers
php artisan clear-compiled
Everything works if I replace interfaces on repositories in MyService, but I feel that it's wrong (should it be handled by IoC container?).
Structure:
app
- Contracts
- CustomModelInterface.php
- Models
- CustomModel.php
- Repositories
- CustomModelRepository.php
- Providers
- AppRepositoryProvider.php
- Services
- MyService.php
App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface.php
<?php namespace App\Contracts;
interface CustomModelInterface {
public function get();
}
App\Repositories\CustomModelRepository.php
<?php namespace App\Repositories;
use App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface;
use App\Models\CustomModel;
class CustomModelRepository implements CustomModelInterface {
private $Model;
public function __construct(CustomModel $model) {
$this->Model = $model;
}
public function get() {
return 'result';
}
}
App\Services\MyService.php (Keep business logic / layer between controller and repositories)
<?php namespace App\Services;
use App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface;
class MyService {
private $Model;
public function __construct(CustomModelInterface $customModel) {
$this->Model= $customModel;
}
public function getAll() {
return $this->Model->get();
}
}
App\Providers\AppRepositoryProvider.php
<?php namespace App\Providers;
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class AppRepositoryProvider extends ServiceProvider {
public function boot() {}
public function register() {
$models = array(
'CustomModel'
);
foreach ($models as $idx => $model) {
$this->app->bind("App\Contracts\{$model}Interface", "App\Repositories\{$model}Repository");
}
}
}
My controller looks like:
<?php namespace App\Http\Controllers;
use App\Services\MyService;
class SuperController extends Controller {
private $My;
public function __construct(MyService $myService) {
$this->My = $myService;
}
public function getDetails() {
return $this->My->getAll();
}
}
composer.json
"autoload": {
"classmap": [
"database"
],
"psr-4": {
"App\\": "app/",
"App\\Models\\": "app/Models/",
"App\\Contracts\\": "app/Contracts/",
"App\\Repositories\\": "app/Repositories/"
}
},
Thank you everyone, but problem was in my AppRepositoryProvider. As it's binding exception, then obviously the problem was with binding :)
Correct file is:
<?php namespace App\Providers;
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class AppRepositoryProvider extends ServiceProvider {
public function boot() {}
public function register() {
$models = array(
'CustomModel',
'CustomModel2',
'CustomModel3'
);
foreach ($models as $model) {
$this->app->bind("App\Contracts\\{$model}Interface", "App\Repositories\\{$model}Repository");
}
}
}
Note, that I'm using "App\Contracts\\{$model}Interface" (not escaping "{" symbol) and it generate correct string App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface instead of App\Contracts\{$model}Interface (with unexpected escaping).
Every time I create a new repository/contract pair I make sure I do the following:
check the classes used in the service provider (copy/paste the namespaces)
register a new binding in config/app.php
php artisan optimize
Many hours of useless debugging led me to this short checklist.
For me, I forgot to bind in app->providers->RepositoryServiceProvider
the repository like this in the register method
public function register()
{
$this->app->bind(
\App\Play\Contracts\PatientRepository::class,
\App\Play\Modules\PatientModule::class
);
}
Make sure your RepositoryServiceProvider is registered in AppServiceProvider.
public function register()
{
$this->app->register(RepositoryServiceProvider::class);
}
I got past this error running:
php artisan config:clear
php artisan clear-compiled
php artisan optimize
php artisan config:cache
Related to:
Target is not instantiable. Laravel 5 - App binding service provider
The problem is solved by adding your repository in app/providers/AppServiceProvider
like the example below.
public function register()
{
$this->app->singleton(UserRepository::class, EloquentUser::class);
}
Dont forget the name space
use Test\Repositories\EloquentUser;
use Test\Repositories\UserRepository;
It worked for me
On App\Services\MyService.php you are passing that interface with dependency injection which tries to instantiate that -
public function __construct(CustomModelInterface $customModel) {
$this->Model= $customModel;
}
which is wrong.
Try implement that in that class - class MyService implements CustomModelInterface { and use the function of that interface like -
$this->get();
Or you are using it - class CustomModelRepository implements CustomModelInterface {
So if you do -
public function __construct(CustomModelRepository $customModel) {
$this->Model= $customModel;
}
then also you can access the interface methods.
I've just experienced an issue similar to this and the cause of my error was that I had set $defer to true in the service provider class but I had not implemented the required provides() method.
If you have deferred the creation of your class until it is need rather than it being loaded eagerly, then you need to also implement the provides method which should simply return an array of the classes that the provider provides. In the case of an interface, I believe it should be the name of the interface rather than the concrete class.
E.g.
public method provides(): array
{
return [
MyInterface::class,
];
}
Current documentation: https://laravel.com/docs/5.5/providers#deferred-providers
I hope this helps somebody else.
Don't worry guys. I have a solution to your problem.
I have an example for you.
Step1: php artisan make:repository Repository/Post //By adding this command you can create a repository and eloquent files
Step2: After adding that file you have to add/use this repository in the controller in which you want to use.
for eg: use App\Repositories\Contracts\PostRepository;
Step3: After adding that repo in your controller if you will run the app you will get an error like " Interface is not instantiable". It comes because you have created a repo and used in a controller, but laravel don't know where this repository is register and bind with which eloquent. So that it throws an error.
Step4: To solve this error you have to bind your repo with your eloquent in AppServiceProvider.
E.g:
AppServiceProvider.php file
<?php
namespace App\Providers;
// **Make sure that your repo file path and eloquent path must be correct.**
use App\Repositories\Contracts\PostRepository; // **Use your repository here**
use App\Repositories\Eloquent\EloquentPostRepository; **// Use your eloquent here**
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class AppServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider {
/**
* Register any application services.
*
* #return void
*/
public function register() {
**// And bind your repository and eloquent here. **
$this->app->bind(PostRepository::class, EloquentPostRepository::class);
}
}
Step5: After binding repo and eloquent you can use all method of repo in your controller. Enjoy.....
Please let me know if you have any query.
execute this command :
composer dump-autoload
this command will remap your laravel autoload classes together with all other vendor's i had same issue before and this did the trick you can use it together with "-o" param for optimization .
Note that this can also be caused by the _constructor on the class being declared private, or otherwise being blocked...
If it cant call the constructor, the binding will fail
I think the problem here is that you don't bind App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface to anything so Laravel tries to create instance of interface.
In App\Providers\AppRepositoryProvider.php you have only:
$models = array(
'Model'
);
but you should have in this array CustomModel also, so it should look like this:
$models = array(
'Model',
'CustomModel',
);
The last thing you do is to use the interface you bound to the repository.
Set it up and try running your laravel app to make sure you get no errors.
In my case I had a mismatch between my repository and interface.
interface UserRepositoryInterface{
public function get($userId);
}
class UserRepository implements UserRepositoryInterface{
public function get(int $userId);
}
As you can see the interface get method does not include a type hint but the UserRepository class' get method has a type hint.
You won't get this error if you immediately start to use your Interface Binding.
register a new binding in config/app.php
In my case I forgot use App\Repositories\UserRepository in App\Providers\AppRepositoryProvider.php
intelephense wasn't complaining and the error-message did not give me any clue, but somehow I found out that it's missing and adding this line did the trick
I had this error, and found out that I should restart the queue because it runs in the job:
php artisan queue:restart
EDITED (Code is updated and working for others)
For the overall idea of what's happening.
I'm trying to access post data from the view in the controller, without refreshing the page.
To do this I am executing the page controller by using a ViewHelper to call the Service below which then forwards back to the controller; afterwards I can manage the posted data in the page controller.
Everything works except the last step which is the forward(), I receive the error Call to undefined method AlbumModule\Service\postAlbumService::forward()
I understand I must implement the ServiceLocatorAwareInterface in order to use the forward() class, but what I've written doesn't seem to work.
<?php
namespace AlbumModule\Service;
use Zend\ServiceManager\ServiceLocatorAwareInterface;
use Zend\ServiceManager\ServiceLocatorInterface;
class postAlbumService implements
ServiceLocatorAwareInterface
{
protected $services;
public function __construct() {
echo '<script>console.log("postAlbumService is Started")</script>';
}
public function setServiceLocator(ServiceLocatorInterface $serviceLocator)
{
$this->services = $serviceLocator;
}
public function getServiceLocator()
{
return $this->services;
}
public function test(){
$cpm = $this->getServiceLocator()->get('controllerpluginmanager');
$fwd = $cpm->get('forward');
echo '<script>console.log("postAlbumService TEST() is Started")</script>';
return $fwd->dispatch('newAlbum', array('action' => 'submitAlbum'));
}
}
It seems as though I'm just having a dependency issue with the forward() class, but I'm not sure what the issue is.
EDIT-
Here is how I am calling the postAlbumService from the viewHelper
<?php
namespace AlbumModule\View\Helper;
use Zend\View\Helper\AbstractHelper;
class invokeIndexAction extends AbstractHelper
{
protected $sm;
public function test()
{
$this->sm->getServiceLocator()->get('AlbumModule\Service\postAlbumService')->test();
}
public function __construct($sm) {
$this->sm = $sm;
}
}
Is there any way to call a specific class in the service being requested, after the dependencies are injected into the service?
You're doing a couple of things wrong and you're misunderstanding some things...
First of all, forward() is a ControllerPlugin. You'll gain access to this method by accessing said manager via the ServiceLocator. An example could be this:
$cpm = $serviceLocator->get('controllerpluginmanager');
$fwd = $cpm->get('forward');
return $fwd->dispatch('foo/bar');
Now, to get the ServiceLocator into any of your Service-Classes you need Dependency Injection. One of the ways is to implement the ServiceLocatorAwareInterface. The ServiceManager of ZF2 has so called Listeners. These Listeners check for implemented interfaces and stuff like this. Whenever it finds a match, it injects the required dependencies via the interfaces given functions. The workflow looks like this:
ServiceManager get('FooBar');
$ret = new FooBar();
foreach (Listener)
if $ret instanceof Listener
doInjectDependenciesInto($ret)
end
end
return $ret
Now what does this tell you. This tells you, that within the __construct() of any of your classes NONE of your required dependencies are actually there. They only get injected AFTER the class/service has been instantiated.
On a last side-note, the given code example doesn't really make much sense ;) No matter what ServiceAction i'd like to access, you'd always return me to the "newAlbum" action...
I have a self-made package. With the service provider I pass the $app instance to the actual class. Then I use:
$this->app['session']->get('key', 'value');
to use the Session component's functionality. However, when I run this, I get the following error:
Using $this when not in object context
So I tried just using
Session::get( ... )
but then it says it doesn't find the class.
How do I solve this?
This is my full class:
namespace AlexCogn\Messenger;
use Illuminate\Foundation\Application as Application;
class Messenger
{
protected $app;
public function __construct(Application $app)
{
$this->app = $app;
}
public static function messages()
{
$messages = $this->app['session']->get('messages', array());
$this->app['session']->forget('messages');
return $messages;
}
public function addMessage($message)
{
$messages = $this->app['session']->get('messages', array());
array_push($messages, $message);
$this->app['session']->put('messages', $messages);
}
}
EDIT:
apparently not everyone understands the question: I am calling Messenger through a Facade:
Messenger::addMessage('test');
and I thought Laravel converted this to
$app['messenger']->addMessage('test');
So shouldn't this be called via an instance?
You are trying to call $this from a static method within your class. This won't work. By PHP definition (and also because it'd be stupid otherwise), $this is only available in the following scopes:
Inside a method that has been called through an instance (i.e. $this->foo())
Inside a class constructor (inside __construct())
Inside a Callable where this has been redefined using the Runkit library
Anything else causes this to trigger the fatal error you have just received. I cannot suggest a fix, as you did not put your code up - however, if you do, I'll be more than happy to find a solution for you.
I am having some trouble with Symfony2. Namely in how to use the __construct() function. the Official Documentation is shockingly bad!
I want to be able to use the following:
public function __construct()
{
parent::__construct();
$user = $this->get('security.context')->getToken()->getUser();
}
How ever I get the following error:
Fatal error: Cannot call constructor in /Sites/src/DEMO/DemoBundle/Controller/Frontend/HomeController.php on line 11
Line 11 is "parent::__construct();"
I removed it and got the following, new error
Fatal error: Call to a member function get() on a non-object in /Sites/vendor/symfony/symfony/src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Controller/Controller.php on line 242
I think I might need to set up the ContainerInterface DIC, but I have no idea how to do this (I tried and failed, miserably)
Any ideas folks?
Update - Tried changing to extend ContainerAware and got this error:
Fatal error: Class DEMO\DemoBundle\Controller\Frontend\HomeController cannot extend from interface Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerAwareInterface in /Sites/src/DEMO/DemoBundle/Controller/Frontend/HomeController.php on line 43
Using the following code in the controller:
<?php
namespace DEMO\DemoBundle\Controller\Frontend;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerAware;
class HomeController extends ContainerAwareInterface
{
protected $container;
public function setContainer(ContainerInterface $container = null)
{
$this->container = $container;
}
I'm assuming you are extending the default Symfony controller? If so, a look at the code will reveal the answer:
namespace Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerAware;
class Controller extends ContainerAware
{
Notice that there is no Controller::__construct defined so using parent::__construct will not get you anywhere. If we look at ContainerAware:
namespace Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection;
class ContainerAware implements ContainerAwareInterface
{
protected $container;
public function setContainer(ContainerInterface $container = null)
{
$this->container = $container;
}
}
Again, no constructor and the container is not available until setContainer is called. So override setContainer and put your logic there. Or else just make a stand alone controller that does not extend the base controller class and inject your dependencies directly into the constructor.
Update Aug 2017
Still getting a few hits on this. If you really want to execute something before each controller then use a kernel controller listener. If all you need is the user then of course use getUser(). And please don't override setContainer(). In some cases it would work but it would just convolute your code.
I also frequently want an instance of the current User in most of my controllers. I find it is easiest to just do something like this:
class SomeController extends Controller
{
protected $user;
public function getUser()
{
if ($this->user === null) {
$this->user = $this->get('security.context')->getToken()->getUser();
}
return $this->user;
}
}
However, this is an overly simplistic example case. If you want to do more work before a Controller action is started, I suggest you define your Controller as a Service.
Also take a look at this article: Moving Away from the Base Controller
I have to retrieve the 'facade' manager for my rest api's resource. Not using the constructor and using a private function seems the easiest and simplest for me.
/**
* Class ExchangesController
* #RouteResource("Exchange")
*/
class ExchangesController extends Controller
{
/**
* Get exchange manager
* #return ExchangeManager
*/
protected function getExchangeManager()
{
return $this->get('exchange_manager');
}
/**
* #ApiDoc(
* description="Retrieve all exchanges",
* statusCodes={
* 200="Successful"
* }
* )
*/
public function cgetAction()
{
return $this->getExchangeManager()->findAll();
}
PS It's ok for me to use private/protected functions in my controller as long as it contains zero conditionals
You cannot call getUser() or get() for services in controller constructors. If you remember that, you will save lots of debugging time.
I know the question is very old, but I didn't found an answer until now. So I'll share it.
The goal here, is to execute a code everytime a action in our controller is called.
The __construct method doesn't work, because it's called before anything else, so you can't access the service container.
The trick is to overload each method automatically when they are called :
<?php
namespace AppBundle\DefaultController;
class DefaultController extends Controller {
private function method1Action() {
return $this->render('method1.html.twig');
}
private function method2Action() {
return $this->render('method2.html.twig');
}
public function __call($method, $args) {
$user = $this->get('security.tokenStorage')->getToken()->getUser();
// Do what you want with the User object or any service. This will be executed each time before one of those controller's actions are called.
return call_user_func_array(array($this, $method), $args);
}
}
Warning ! You have to define each method as a private method ! Or the __call magic method won't be called.
There are only two solutions to this problem:
Use a private method as pointed out by #Tjorriemorrie here. But this is a dirty method for purists. (I'm using this! :D );
Define the controller as a service, but this way you will lose all the shortcuts provided by Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\Controller. Here is the article that shows how to do this.
As told, personally, in my situation, I prefere a solution like this:
class MyController extends Controller
{
/** #var AwesomeDependency */
private $dependency;
public function anAction()
{
$result = $this->getDependency();
}
/**
* Returns your dependency.
*/
private function getDependency()
{
if (null === $this->dependency)
$this->dependency = $this->get('your.awesome.dependency');
return $this->dependency;
}
}
This is typically a class that I call MyManager where I put the code that I use in more than one action in the controller or that unusefully occupies lines (for example the code to create and populate forms, or other code to do heavy tasks or tasks that require a lot of code).
This way I mantain the code in the action clear in its purposes, without adding confusion.
Maybe the use of a property to store the dependency is an overoptimization, but... I like it :)
As i see, Controller extends ContainerAware, and if we take a look of ContainerAware it implements ContainerAwareInterface. So, ContainerAware must have declared the exact methods in it's interface. Add this line
public function __construct();
to the ContainerAwareInterface definition and it will be solved.