I have written a little script to automate some calculations for me. It is pretty simple.
1*3=3
2*3=6
3*3=9 and so on. When the answer(product) is more than one digit long I want it to add the digits of the answer.
3*4=12 || 1+2=3.
I want it to automatically add the answer if it is more than one digit no matter how many times adding the answer arrives larger than a single digit.
as in when you reach 13*3=39 || 3+9=12 || 1+2=3
Currently my code does not loop, and i cannot figure out how to make it loop here.
http://screencast.com/t/MdpQ9XEz
Also, it is not adding up more than 2 digit answers see 34*3=102. any help here to allow it infinity addition would be great.
As each line is produced the answers get larger, so it should add as many digits there are in the answer.
here is my code:
$i = 1; //Start with one
function count_digit($number) {
return strlen((string) $number);
};
while($i < 500){
$product = $i * 3; //Multiply set
$number_of_digits = count_digit($product); //calls function to count digits of $sum
if($number_of_digits > 1){ //if $sum has more than one digit add the digits together
$addproduct = strval($product);//seperates the digits of $sum
$ii = 0;
while($ii <= $number_of_digits -1){
$io = $ii + 1;
if($io < $number_of_digits){
$one = intval($addproduct[$ii]);
$two = intval($addproduct[$io]);
$sum = $one + $two;
print($i . ' * 3 = ' .$product. ' || ' .$one. ' + ' .$two. ' = ' .$sum. '<br>');
};$ii++;
};
}else{
Print ($i . ' * 3 = ' .$product.'<br>'); //Print Set
};
$i++; //add one
}
For a start, you might replace the $i=1, while ..., and $i++ into one statement: for ($i=0; $i<500; $i++) {.... - see http://nz1.php.net/manual/en/control-structures.for.php for more information about for loops. It comes out to effectively the same code, but keeps the three parts (initialisation, test, increment counter) together; it makes it clear that they are related, and quicker to understand.
Next I would replace conversion of the number to a string, seeing if the length of the string is greater than one, etc.... with:
while ($product>10) {
$out=0;
while ($product) {
$out+=$product%10;
$product=(integer)($product/10);
}
$product=$out;
}
Note that at no time am I treating a number as a string - I avoid that wherever possible.
In case you are not familiar with it, $something+=$somethingelse is the same as $something=$sometime+$somethingelse, just a shorthand. $out is the running total, and each time around the inner loop (while $product), $out is increased by the rightmost digit (the ones column): $out+=$product%10 - see http://nz2.php.net/operators.arithmetic for more info, then $product is divided by 10 and converted to an integer, so 12 becomes 1.2, then 1, dropping the right-most digit.
Each time the inner loop is complete (all the digits of $product are used up, and $product is 0), the result (in $out) is copied to $product, and then you get back to the outer loop (to see if the sum of all these digits is now less than 10).
Also important is exactly where in each loop you print what. The first part, with the multiplication, is immediately in the '500' loop; the '||' happens once for each time '$product' is reduced to '$out'; the adding of the digits happens inside the innermost loop, with '+' either BEFORE each digit except the first, or AFTER each digit except the last. Since 'all except the last' is easier to calculate ($product>=10, watch those edge cases!), I chose that one.
Also note that, since I'm adding the digits from the right to the left, rather than left-to-right, the addition is reversed. I do not know if that will be an issue. Always consider if reversing the order will save you a lot of work. Obviously, if they NEED to be done in a particular order, then that might be a problem.
The result is:
for ($i=0; $i<500; $i++) {
$product = $i * 3; //Multiply set
print ($i . ' * 3 = ' .$product);
while ($product>10) {
print ' || ';
$out=0;
while ($product>0) {
print ($product%10);
if ($product>=10) {
print " + ";
}
$out+=$product%10;
$product=(integer)($product/10);
}
$product=$out;
print(' = ' .$product);
}
print "<br>";
};
I've decided to add this as a separate answer, because it uses a different approach to answer your question: the least amount of changes to fix the problem, rather than rewriting the code in an easy-to-read way.
There are two problems with your code, which require two separate fixes.
Problem 1: Your code does not add 3 digit (or more) numbers correctly.
If you look carefully at your code, you will notice that you are adding pairs of numbers ($one and $two); each time you add a pair of numbers, you print it out. This means that for the number 102, you are adding 1 and 0, printing out the results, then adding 0 and 2 and printing it out. Look carefully at your results, and you will see that 102 appears twice!
One way to fix this is to use $three and $four (4 digits is enough for 500*3). This is not good programming, because if you later need 5 digits, you will need to and $five, and so forth.
The way to program this is to start with a $sum of zero, then go through each digit, and add it to the sum, thusly:
$ii = 0;
$sum = 0;
while($ii <= $number_of_digits - 1){
$one = intval($addproduct[$ii]);
$sum = $sum + $one;
$ii++;
}
print($i . ' * 3 = ' .$product. ' || ' . $sum . '<br>');
};
The inner if disappears, of course, since it relates to $io, which we are no longer using.
Of course, now you lose your ability to print the individual digits as you are adding them up. If you want those in, and since we don't know in advance how many there are, you would have to keep a record of them. A string would be suitable for that. Here is how I would do it:
$ii = 0;
$sum = 0;
$maths = "";
while($ii <= $number_of_digits-1){
$one = intval($addproduct[$ii]);
if ($maths=="") {
$maths=$one;
} else {
$maths=$maths . " + " .$one;
}
$sum = $sum + $one;
$ii++;
}
print($i . ' * 3 = ' .$product. ' || ' . $maths . " = " . $sum . '<br>');
};
Note the lines with $math in them; there's one at the top, setting it to an empty string. Then, once we've decided on what number we're adding, we add this to $maths. The first time round is a special case, since we don't want "+" before our first digit, so we make an exception - if $maths is empty, we set it to $one; later times around the loop, it's not empty, so we add " + " . $one;
Problem 2: if the result of the addition is more than 1 digit long, go around again. And again, as many times as required.
At this point I would suggest a little refactoring: I would break the print statement into several parts. First the multiplication - that can easily be moved to the top, immediately after the actual multiplication. Printing the <br> can go at the end, immediately before the $i++. This also means you no longer need the else clause - it's already done. This only leaves the ' || ' . $maths . " = " . $sum. This is going to have to happen every time you go through the adding.
Now, replace your if($number_of_digits... with a while($number_of_digits...; this means it goes through as many times as is needed, if it's zero or 100. This does mean that you're going to have to update $product at the end of your loop, with $product = $sum; - put this immediately after the print statement. You will also need to update $number_of_digits; copy the line from the top to the end of the loop.
If you've been following along, you should have:
$i = 1; //Start with one
function count_digit($number) {
return strlen((string) $number);
};
while($i < 500){
$product = $i * 3; //Multiply set
print($i . ' * 3 = ' .$product); // Print basic multiplication
$number_of_digits = count_digit($product); //calls function to count digits of $sum
while ($number_of_digits > 1){ //if $sum has more than one digit add the digits together
$addproduct = strval($product);//seperates the digits of $sum
$ii = 0;
$sum = 0;
$maths = "";
while($ii <= $number_of_digits-1){
$one = intval($addproduct[$ii]);
if ($maths=="") {
$maths=$one;
} else {
$maths=$maths . " + " .$one;
}
$sum = $sum + $one;
$ii++;
}
print(" || " . $maths . " = " . $sum ); // print one lot of adding
$product=$sum;
$number_of_digits = count_digit($product); //calls function to count digits of $sum
};
Print ("<br>"); //go to next line
$i++; //add one
}
Related
(Working on a search algorithm) I want to iterate over possible matches with two bits set in a 16bit word. Seems like a silly problem with a currently overly-complex solution.
Iteration should return (decimal) 3,5,6,9,10,12,17...
What's the proper word for the problem? Bit-mask-looping?
Any clever function for this?
Current code - now updated:
(As it stands, i guess there's no easier way around this.)
<?php
function biterate($numBits=8, $setBits=2, $maxval=null) {
//init
if(is_null($maxval)) $maxval = (pow(2,$setBits)-1) * pow(2,$numBits - $setBits);
$err = 0;
header('content-type:text/plain');
echo '-- ' . $setBits . ' of ' . $numBits . " --\r\n";
$result = str_pad('', $numBits - $setBits, '0') . str_pad('', $setBits, '1');
do {
$err++;
if($err > 200) die('bad code');
//echo and calc next val.
echo $result . ' : ' . bindec($result) . "\r\n";
//count set bits and search for '01' to be replaced with '10'. From LSB.
$bitDivend = '';
$hit = false;
for($i=$numBits;$i>0;$i--) {
if(substr($result,$i-2,2) == '01') {
$hit = true;
//do the replacement and replace the lower part with bitDivend.
$result = substr($result, 0, $i-2) . '10';
$result .= str_pad('',$numBits - $i - strlen($bitDivend),'0');
$result .= $bitDivend;
//exit loop
$i = 0;
}
if($result[$i-1] == '1') $bitDivend .= '1';
}
} while($hit && bindec($result) <= $maxval);
}
biterate(8,2);
biterate(8,7);
biterate();
If you just want all the 16 bit ints with 2 bits set, the following code should do it:
<?php
for($i=1;$i<16;$i++)
{
for($j=0;$j<$i;$j++)
{
echo (1<<$i)|(1<<$j) , "\r\n";
}
}
?>
If you look at the bit patterns of the numbers you can see how it works:
11 3
101 5
110 6
1001 9
1010 10
1100 12
10001 17
10010 18
10100 20
11000 24
etc. You just move the most significant bit one place to the left (another power of 2) for each iteration of the outer loop, and inside the inner loop you iterate from the least significant bit (1) to 1 place to the right of the most significant bit.
If you wanted to generalise this to support an arbitrary number of bits and places, you could extend the above algorithm using recursion:
<?php
function biterate_recursive($numBits=8, $setBits=2, $initialValue=0, $maxval=null) {
for($i=$setBits-1;$i<$numBits;$i++)
{
if(!is_null($maxval) && ($initialValue|(1<<$i)) > $maxval)
break;
if($setBits==1)
echo $initialValue|(1<<$i) , "\r\n";
else
biterate_recursive($i, $setBits-1, $initialValue|(1<<$i), $maxval);
}
}
biterate_recursive(16, 2);
?>
You can also think of the problem as just choosing combinations i.e. C(16,2) choosing 2 numbers a,b from the set 0-15, and then calculating (1<<a)|(1<<b). However you have to be careful about your choice of combination algorithm if you want to get the numbers in order.
I am trying to create a random string which will be used as a short reference number. I have spent the last couple of days trying to get this to work but it seems to get to around 32766 records and then it continues with endless duplicates. I need at minimum 200,000 variations.
The code below is a very simple mockup to explain what happens. The code should be syntaxed according to 1a-x1y2z (example) which should give a lot more results than 32k
I have a feeling it may be related to memory but not sure. Any ideas?
<?php
function createReference() {
$num = rand(1, 9);
$alpha = substr(str_shuffle("abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"), 0, 1);
$char = '0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz';
$charLength = strlen($char);
$rand = '';
for ($i = 0; $i < 6; $i++) {
$rand .= $char[rand(0, $charLength - 1)];
}
return $num . $alpha . "-" . $rand;
}
$codes = [];
for ($i = 1; $i <= 200000; $i++) {
$code = createReference();
while (in_array($code, $codes) == true) {
echo 'Duplicate: ' . $code . '<br />';
$code = createReference();
}
$codes[] = $code;
echo $i . ": " . $code . "<br />";
}
exit;
?>
UPDATE
So I am beginning to wonder if this is not something with our WAMP setup (Bitnami) as our local machine gets to exactly 1024 records before it starts duplicating. By removing 1 character from the string above (instead of 6 in the for loop I make it 5) it gets to exactly 32768 records.
I uploaded the script to our centos server and had no duplicates.
What in our enviroment could cause such a behaviour?
The code looks overly complex to me. Let's assume for the moment you really want to create n unique strings each based on a single random value (rand/mt_rand/something between INT_MIN,INT_MAX).
You can start by decoupling the generation of the random values from the encoding (there seems to be nothing in the code that makes a string dependant on any previous state - excpt for the uniqueness). Comparing integers is quite a bit faster than comparing arbitrary strings.
mt_rand() returns anything between INT_MIN and INT_MAX, using 32bit integers (could be 64bit as well, depends on how php has been compiled) that gives ~232 elements. You want to pick 200k, let's make it 400k, that's ~ a 1/10000 of the value range. It's therefore reasonable to assume everything goes well with the uniqueness...and then check at a later time. and add more values if a collision occured. Again much faster than checking in_array in each iteration of the loop.
Once you have enough values, you can encode/convert them to a format you wish. I don't know whether the <digit><character>-<something> format is mandatory but assume it is not -> base_convert()
<?php
function unqiueRandomValues($n) {
$values = array();
while( count($values) < $n ) {
for($i=count($values);$i<$n; $i++) {
$values[] = mt_rand();
}
$values = array_unique($values);
}
return $values;
}
function createReferences($n) {
return array_map(
function($e) {
return base_convert($e, 10, 36);
},
unqiueRandomValues($n)
);
}
$start = microtime(true);
$references = createReferences(400000);
$end = microtime(true);
echo count($references), ' ', count(array_unique($references)), ' ', $end-$start, ' ', $references[0];
prints e.g. 400000 400000 3.3981630802155 f3plox on my i7-4770. (The $end-$start part is constantly between 3.2 and 3.4)
Using base_convert() there can be strings like li10, which can be quite annoying to decipher if you have to manually type the string.
I'm trying to distribute 100% to total numbers (not equally), it can be done manually but I'm looking for a automatically way in PHP. I had to open calculator and get it done for manual.
What I'm trying to achieve is the result similar to this:
$value = 10000;
$total_numbers = 9
$a1 = $value*0.2;
$a2 = $value*0.175;
$a3 = $value*0.15;
$a4 = $value*0.125;
$a5 = $value*0.1;
$a6 = $value*0.08;
$a7 = $value*0.07;
$a8 = $value*0.05;
$a9 = $value*0.04;
So as you can see, the first variables have more quantity than the later ones, but if you add these, it will be 1 which is 100%. So lets say I have total_numbers=20 then I'll have to re-write it and get a calculator and do it the hard way to accomplish my goal. Is there any way this can be done automatically with a function where I can just tell the total number and it can distribute it to proportions or something?
The first one will always be bigger than rest, then second one bigger than rest but smaller than first, third one being greater than rest but small than first and second, and so on.
function distributeValue($value, $num) {
$parts = $num * ($num + 1) / 2;
$values = [];
for ($i = $num; $i > 1; --$i) {
$values[] = round($value * $i / $parts);
}
$values[] = $value - array_sum($values);
return $values;
}
var_dump(distributeValue(10000, 9));
This works by calculating the $numth triangle number (the number you get by adding all the numbers from 1 to $num) and dividing the total value up into this number of parts.
It then starts by taking $num parts, then $num-1 parts and so on.
Since it's rounding the numbers, the last step is to take the total minus all the other values which is around one part. If you are fine with getting floats instead of ints out, then you can remove the $values[] = $value - array_sum($values); line and change the condition of the for loop to $i > 0.
Am new to php i have faced an interview some days ago, and the interviewer asked a question like the following one.
The given array has 99 numbers, which contains the digits from 1 to 100
with one digit missing. Describe two different algorithms that finds you the missing number. The algorithm should optimize for low storage and fast processing. Output should show the execution time of each algorithm.
And i have searched google about it, and come to know its a common puzzle used to ask in interviews. I found out the answer like this way.
int sum = 0;
int idx = -1;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] == 0) {
idx = i;
} else {
sum += arr[i];
}
}
// the total sum of numbers between 1 and arr.length.
int total = (arr.length + 1) * arr.length / 2;
System.out.println("missing number is: " + (total - sum) + " at index " + idx);
But the code is not in php,
Can u please help me to find out the php code and algorithm name. So i can improve my answer in the next interviews.
In PHP you can easily use some array functions and achieve that. Best way is,
$missing = array_diff(range(1,100),$array);
DEMO.
Another way to do it is by using the array_sum function and the knowledge that all numbers from 1 to 100 added together equals 5050.
$missing = 5050-array_sum($array);
Converted to PHP, it is nearly the same.
(Not tested)
Of course, there are better ways, like the one Rikesh posted, but this is the exact one you asked for:
$sum = 0
$idx = -1
for($i = 0; $i < count($arr); $i++){
if($arr[$i] == 0){
$idx = $i;
}else{
$sum += $arr[$i];
}
}
$total = (count($arr) + 1) * (count($arr) / 2);
echo "Missing: " . ($total - $sum) . " at index " . $idx;
$arr=range(1,99);
$j=1;
for($i=0;$i<100;$i++){
if(!in_array($j,$arr)){
echo $j.'is missing';
}
$j++;
}
I need help creating PHP code to echo and run a function only 30% of the time.
Currently I have code below but it doesn't seem to work.
if (mt_rand(1, 3) == 2)
{
echo '';
theFunctionIWantCalled();
}
Are you trying to echo what the function returns? That would be
if(mt_rand(1,100) <= 30)
{
echo function();
}
What you currently have echoes a blank statement, then executes a function. I also changed the random statement. Since this is only pseudo-random and not true randomness, more options will give you a better chance of hitting it 30% of the time.
If you intended to echo a blank statement, then execute a function,
if(mt_rand(1,100) <= 30)
{
echo '';
function();
}
would be correct. Once again, I've changed the if-statement to make it more evenly distributed. To help insure a more even distribution, you could even do
if(mt_rand(1,10000) <= 3000)
since we aren't dealing with true randomness here. It's entirely possible that the algorithm is choosing one number more than others. As was mentioned in the comments of this question, since the algorithm is random, it could be choosing the same number over, and over, and over again. However, in practice, having more numbers to choose from will most likely result in an even distribution. Having only 3 numbers to choose from can skew the results.
Since you are using rand you can't guarantee it will be called 30% of the time. Where you could instead use modulus which will effectively give you 1/3 of the time, not sure how important this is for you but...
$max = 27;
for($i = 1; $i < $max; $i++){
if($i % 3 == 0){
call_function_here();
}
}
Since modulus does not work with floats you can use fmod, this code should be fairly close you can substitute the total iterations and percent...
$total = 50;
$percent = 0.50;
$calls = $total * $percent;
$interval = $total / $calls;
$called = 0;
$notcalled = 0;
for($i = 0; $i <= $total; $i++){
if(fmod($i, $interval) < 1){
$called++;
echo "Called" . "\n";
}else{
$notcalled++;
echo "Not Called" . "\n";
}
}
echo "Called: " . $called . "\n";
echo "Not Called: " . $notcalled . "\n";