I'm learning symfony and currently I'm looking into Knp DoctrineBehaviors Tree, and I'm confused a little bit, because in the trait: https://github.com/KnpLabs/DoctrineBehaviors/blob/master/src/Knp/DoctrineBehaviors/Model/Tree/Node.php there is a $childNodes and getter getChildNodes() which make sense but getChildNodes always returns empty array for me and I agree with this because I don't set $childNodes any where so it will always return empty ArrayCollection. So my question is should my application look after this? Or I undestand that wrongly?
/**
* #var ArrayCollection $childNodes the children in the tree
*/
private $childNodes;
...
...
...
/**
* {#inheritdoc}
**/
public function getChildNodes()
{
return $this->childNodes = $this->childNodes ?: new ArrayCollection;
}
Thanks for any help.
Yes you need to set the child nodes. But the api for doing this are as bellow:
//To set $child as child node for a $parent entity
$child->setParentNode($parent);
//OR
$child->setChildOf($parent);
$parent->isParentOf($child); //return true
$child->isParentOf($parent); //return false
Whenever you need to access getChildNodes() you need Build the tree first:
$root = $em->getRepository('Category')->getTree();
$root->getParent(); // null
$root->getChildNodes(); // ArrayCollection
$root[0][1]; // node or null
$root->isLeaf(); // boolean
$root->isRoot(); // boolean
The idea behind this tree implementation is that there is no relationship between parent and children (foreign key). All the relations are defined via a materialized path, a string stored in each node. So before build tree you can't access this getParentNode() and getChildNodes() functions.
Just for your thought: To get all child by parent_id you can define the following function in your repository
public function getChildrenByParentID($parentId)
{
$parentPath = $this->find($parentId)->getRealMaterializedPath();
return $this->getTree($parentPath)->getChildNodes();
}
Updated: You can use following function(define in your repository class) to read all root level nodes:
public function getRootLevelNodes()
{
$qb = $this->createQueryBuilder('t');
return $qb
->where($qb->expr()->eq('t.materializedPath', '?1'))
->setParameter(1, '');
}
You can read more about Doctrine ORM behaviors, or how to use traits efficiently
Related
I've been reading this post : Doctrine - how to check if a collection contains an entity
But I actually don't like the solution, as, doctrine already provide the contains() method, which have the advantage to keep logic directly into the object, and then to not load EXTRA_LAZY collections entirely.
So here a Cart Entity own a CartProduct collection as is :
/**
* ...
* #ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="App\Repository\CartRepository")
*/
abstract class Cart implements InheritanceInterface{
...
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="CartProduct", mappedBy="cart", fetch="EXTRA_LAZY", cascade={"persist"})
*/
private Collection $cartProducts;
...
public function __construct()
{
$this->cartProducts = new ArrayCollection();
}
...
}
(CartProduct have to be an Entity look at this simplify EA model. That's a standard way to proceed for related entity holding extra fields)
Now I want to add a new ProductCart Entity to my Cart class.
So I'm adding this method (generated by Symfony make:entity) :
abstract class Cart implements InheritanceInterface{
...
public function addCartProduct(CartProduct $cartProduct): self
{
if(!$this->getCartProducts()->contains($cartProduct)) {
$this->cartProducts->add($cartProduct);
$cartProduct->setCart($this);
}
return $this;
}
...
And then I test this code :
public function testAddCartProduct()
{
$cart = new ShoppingCart($this->createMock(ShoppingCartState::class));
$cart_product = new CartProduct();
$cart_product->setProduct(new Product(self::NO_.'1', new Group('1')));
$cart->addCartProduct($cart_product);
$cart_product2 = new CartProduct();
$cart_product2->setProduct(new Product(self::NO_.'1', new Group('1')));
$cart->addCartProduct($cart_product2);
$this->assertCount(1, $cart->getCartProducts());
}
But when I run this test, it fail :
Failed asserting that actual size 2 matches expected size 1.
So I check, and the Cart.cartProducts Collection have two product which are exactly the same objects.
As it's an ArrayCollection, I suppose that it just use this method :
namespace Doctrine\Common\Collections;
class ArrayCollection implements Collection, Selectable {
...
public function contains($element)
{
return in_array($element, $this->elements, true);
}
So well, of course in this case it is just return false, And the objects are considered to be different.
So now, I wish I could use PersistentCollection instead of ArrayCollection when implementing the Collection object , because the PersistentCollection.contains() method looks better.
abstract class Cart implements InheritanceInterface{
...
public function __construct()
{
-- $this->cartProducts = new ArrayCollection();
++ $this->cartProducts = new PersistentCollection(...);
}
}
But this require an EntityManager as a parameter, so, seams a little bit overkill to give an EntityManager to an Entity object...
So I finally, I don't know what is the better way to check for a dupplicate entity inside a collection.
Of course, I could implement myself a thing like :
abstract class Cart implements InheritanceInterface{
...
public function addCartProduct(CartProduct $cartProduct): self
{
if(!$this->getCartProducts()->filter(
function (CartProduct $cp)use($cartProduct){
return $cp->getId() === $cartProduct->getId();
})->count()) {
$this->cartProducts->add($cartProduct);
$cartProduct->setCart($this);
}
return $this;
}
...
But it'll require to load every Entity and I really don't like the idea.
Personally I agree with your comment, I don't think the entity itself should have the responsibility to ensure there is no duplicate.
The entity cannot make a request like a repository could, and I don't see how you can be sure there is no duplicate in the database without querying it.
Calling contains will not trigger a fetch in your case, this means the collection will stay as is, which is not what you want anyway because you could have a previously persisted duplicate that will not be part of the collection because you marked it as EXTRA_LAZY.
You also don't want to fetch all the entities of the collection (and transform the results into objects) just to check if you have a collision.
So IMHO you should create a method in the repository of the entity to check for duplicates, a simple SELECT COUNT(id).
Then there is your real problem.
The way you make your test will never find a collision. When you do:
$cart = new ShoppingCart($this->createMock(ShoppingCartState::class));
$cart_product = new CartProduct();
$cart_product->setProduct(new Product(self::NO_.'1', new Group('1')));
$cart->addCartProduct($cart_product);
$cart_product2 = new CartProduct();
$cart_product2->setProduct(new Product(self::NO_.'1', new Group('1')));
$cart->addCartProduct($cart_product2);
$this->assertCount(1, $cart->getCartProducts());
You are creating two instances of CartProduct, that's why the call to contains doesn't find anything.
Because contains checks for the object reference, not the content, like you can see in its implementation:
public function contains($element)
{
return in_array($element, $this->elements, true);
}
So in your test case what you're really testing is:
in_array(new CartProduct(), [new CartProduct()], true);
which will always return false.
I wonder what is the good practices :
Let's say I have 2 entities, ManyToOne. Both are ApiResources, and both have an Output DTO. So Both have a transformer.
<?php
/**
* #ORM\Entity
* #ApiResource(
* output="Dto\Foo"
* )
*/
class Foo
{
private int $id;
/**
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Bar")
*/
private Bar $bar;
}
Problem is, when I transform the entity Foo into a DTO Foo, I want to hydrate it with a Bar DTO, not a Bar entity. But since I hydrate it with from an entity, I have a Bar entity. Later in the process, the Bar entity is replaced by a Bar DTO, ApiPlateform is working, but my mental problem is : the bar property type is modified over time (Moreover it can't be Typehinted). Seems dirty to me, isn't it ?
Illustration:
the Transofmer
<?php
use ApiPlatform\Core\DataTransformer\DataTransformerInterface;
class FooEntityToFooDToTransormer implements DataTransformerInterface
{
public function transform($object, string $to, array $context = [])
{
return new FooDto($object);
// maybe there is a better way to hydrate FooDto, by getting directly a BarDto here ?
}
}
The DTO :
<?php
namespace Dto;
class Foo
{
public int $id;
// problem is I cant typehint here
public $bar;
public function __construct(FooEntity $fooEntity)
{
$this->id = $fooEntity->getId();
$this->bar = $fooEntity->getBar(); // <-- return a Bar entity, transformed later by ApiPlatform into a Bar DTO.
}
}
It there a way or a good practice to proper hydrate a DTO from an entity, especially about relations ?
Edit :
I actually prefer not Typehint $bar as its normalization (so its transformation) should be handled by ApiPlateform. But then, circular references are not handeled (memory limit) and I don't really know why (probably confusion between object and DTO).
I don't think my FooTransformer should know how to transform Bar, because according to the context I could need one transformer or another, or an IRI... Test all of them with "supportTransformation" and so, for every relation ? And what about circular ?
It's a little mess, my solution for now is to choose to return FooDto (without transform barDto) or to return an IRI, according to the context (which I am absolutly not sure of what I'm doing with it due to the lack of documentation about $context).
Same for BarTransformer.
So every transformer need to choose to actually transform the object without handeling transformation of relations, or return the correspondant IRI. That is the less dirty I found.
I guess you have two possible solutions here, to extend your DTO's constructor signature by one more argument and adjust your transformer or to do the transformation right inside your DTO's constructor:
<?php
namespace Dto;
class FooDto
{
public BarDto $bar;
// first variant
public function __construct(FooEntity $fooEntity, BarDto $barDto)
{
$this->id = $fooEntity->getId();
$this->bar = $barDto;
}
// second
public function __construct(FooEntity $fooEntity)
{
$this->id = $fooEntity->getId();
$this->bar = new BarDto($fooEntity->getBar());
}
}
I'm using an embed Symfony form to add and remove Tag entities right from the article editor. Article is the owning side on the association:
class Article
{
/**
* #ManyToMany(targetEntity="Tags", inversedBy="articles", cascade={"persist"})
*/
private $tags;
public function addTag(Tag $tags)
{
if (!$this->tags->contains($tags)) // It is always true.
$this->tags[] = $tags;
}
}
The condition doesn't help here, as it is always true, and if it wasn't, no new tags would be persisted to the database at all. Here is the Tag entity:
class Tag
{
/**
* #Column(unique=true)
*/
private $name
/**
* #ManyToMany(targetEntity="Articles", mappedBy="tags")
*/
private $articles;
public function addArticle(Article $articles)
{
$this->articles[] = $articles;
}
}
I've set $name to unique, because I want to use the same tag every time I enter the same name in the form. But it doesn't work this way, and I get the exception:
Integrity constraint violation: 1062 Duplicate entry
What do I need to change to use article_tag, the default join table when submitting a tag name, that's already in the Tag table?
I have been battling with a similar issue for months and finally found a solution that seems to be working very well in my application. It's a complex application with quite a few many-to-many associations and I need to handle them with maximum efficiency.
The solution is explained in part here: http://docs.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrine-orm/en/latest/reference/faq.html#why-do-i-get-exceptions-about-unique-constraint-failures-during-em-flush
You were already halfway there with your code:
public function addTag(Tag $tags)
{
if (!$this->tags->contains($tags)) // It is always true.
$this->tags[] = $tags;
}
Basically what I have added to this is to set indexedBy="name" and fetch="EXTRA_LAZY" on the owning side of the relationship, which in your case is Article entity (you may need to scroll the code block horizontally to see the addition):
class Article
{
/**
* #ManyToMany(targetEntity="Tags", inversedBy="articles", cascade={"persist"}, indexedBy="name" fetch="EXTRA_LAZY")
*/
private $tags;
You can read up about the fetch="EXTRA_LAZY" option here.
You can read up about indexBy="name" option here.
Next, I modified my versions of your addTag() method as follows:
public function addTag(Tag $tags)
{
// Check for an existing entity in the DB based on the given
// entity's PRIMARY KEY property value
if ($this->tags->contains($tags)) {
return $this; // or just return;
}
// This prevents adding duplicates of new tags that aren't in the
// DB already.
$tagKey = $tag->getName() ?? $tag->getHash();
$this->tags[$tagKey] = $tags;
}
NOTE: The ?? null coalesce operator requires PHP7+.
By setting the fetch strategy for tags to EXTRA_LAZY the following statement causes Doctrine to perform a SQL query to check if a Tag with the same name exists in the DB (see the related EXTRA_LAZY link above for more):
$this->tags->contains($tags)
NOTE: This can only return true if the PRIMARY KEY field of the entity passed to it is set. Doctrine can only query for existing entities in the database/entity map based on the PRIMARY KEY of that entity, when using methods like ArrayCollection::contains(). If the name property of the Tag entity is only a UNIQUE KEY, that's probably why it's always returning false. You will need a PRIMARY KEY to use methods like contains() effectively.
The rest of the code in the addTag() method after the if block creates a key for the ArrayCollection of Tags either by the value in the PRIMARY KEY property (preferred if not null) or by the Tag entity's hash (search Google for "PHP + spl_object_hash", used by Doctrine to index entities). So, you are creating an indexed association, so that if you add the same entity twice before a flush, it will just be re-added at the same key, but not duplicated.
Two main solutions
First
Use a data transformer
class TagsTransformer implements DataTransformerInterface
{
/**
* #var ObjectManager
*/
private $om;
/**
* #param ObjectManager $om
*/
public function __construct(ObjectManager $om)
{
$this->om = $om;
}
/**
* used to give a "form value"
*/
public function transform($tag)
{
if (null === $tag) {
//do proper actions
}
return $issue->getName();
}
/**
* used to give "a db value"
*/
public function reverseTransform($name)
{
if (!$name) {
//do proper actions
}
$issue = $this->om
->getRepository('YourBundleName:Tag')
->findOneBy(array('name' => $name))
;
if (null === $name) {
//create a new tag
}
return $tag;
}
}
Second
Use lifecycle callback. In particular you can use prePersist trigger onto your article entity? In that way you can check for pre-existing tags and let your entity manager manage them for you (so he don't need to try to persist causing errors).
You can learn more about prePersist here
HINT FOR SECOND SOLUTION
Make a custom repository method for search and fetch old tags (if any)
I have a very simple entity(WpmMenu) that holds menu items connected to one another in a self-referencing relationship (adjecent list it's called)?
so in my entity I have:
protected $id
protected $parent_id
protected $level
protected $name
with all the getters/setters the relationships are:
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="WpmMenu", mappedBy="parent")
*/
protected $children;
/**
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="WpmMenu", inversedBy="children", fetch="LAZY")
* #ORM\JoinColumn(name="parent_id", referencedColumnName="id", onUpdate="CASCADE", onDelete="CASCADE")
*/
protected $parent;
public function __construct() {
$this->children = new ArrayCollection();
}
And everything works fine. When I render the menu tree, I get the root element from the repository, get its children, and then loop through each child, get its children and do this recursively until I have rendered each item.
What happens (and for what I am seeking a solution)is this:
At the moment I have 5 level=1 items and each of these items have 3 level=2 items attached (and in the future I will be using level=3 items as well). To get all elements of my menu tree Doctrine executes:
1 query for the root element +
1 query to get the 5 children(level=1) of the root element +
5 queries to get the 3 children(level=2) of each of the level 1 items +
15 queries (5x3) to get the children(level=3) of each level 2 items
TOTAL: 22 queries
So, I need to find a solution for this and ideally I would like to have 1 query only.
So this is what I am trying to do:
In my entities repository(WpmMenuRepository) I use queryBuilder and get a flat array of all menu items ordered by level. Get the root element(WpmMenu) and add "manually" its children from the loaded array of elements. Then do this recursively on children. Doing this way I could have the same tree but with a single query.
So this is what I have:
WpmMenuRepository:
public function setupTree() {
$qb = $this->createQueryBuilder("res");
/** #var Array */
$res = $qb->select("res")->orderBy('res.level', 'DESC')->addOrderBy('res.name','DESC')->getQuery()->getResult();
/** #var WpmMenu */
$treeRoot = array_pop($res);
$treeRoot->setupTreeFromFlatCollection($res);
return($treeRoot);
}
and in my WpmMenu entity I have:
function setupTreeFromFlatCollection(Array $flattenedDoctrineCollection){
//ADDING IMMEDIATE CHILDREN
for ($i=count($flattenedDoctrineCollection)-1 ; $i>=0; $i--) {
/** #var WpmMenu */
$docRec = $flattenedDoctrineCollection[$i];
if (($docRec->getLevel()-1) == $this->getLevel()) {
if ($docRec->getParentId() == $this->getId()) {
$docRec->setParent($this);
$this->addChild($docRec);
array_splice($flattenedDoctrineCollection, $i, 1);
}
}
}
//CALLING CHILDREN RECURSIVELY TO ADD REST
foreach ($this->children as &$child) {
if ($child->getLevel() > 0) {
if (count($flattenedDoctrineCollection) > 0) {
$flattenedDoctrineCollection = $child->setupTreeFromFlatCollection($flattenedDoctrineCollection);
} else {
break;
}
}
}
return($flattenedDoctrineCollection);
}
And this is what happens:
Everything works out fine, BUT I end up with each menu items present twice. ;) Instead of 22 queries now I have 23. So I actually worsened the case.
What really happens, I think, is that even if I add the children added "manually", the WpmMenu entity is NOT considered in-sync with the database and as soon as I do the foreach loop on its children the loading is triggered in ORM loading and adding the same children that were added already "manually".
Q: Is there a way to block/disable this behaviour and tell these entities they they ARE in sync with the db so no additional querying is needed?
With immense relief (and a lots of learning about Doctrine Hydration and UnitOfWork) I found the answer to this question. And as with lots of things once you find the answer you realize that you can achieve this with a few lines of code. I am still testing this for unknown side-effects but it seems to be working correctly.
I had quite a lot of difficulties to identify what the problem was - once I did it was much easier to search for an answer.
So the problem is this: Since this is a self-referencing entity where the entire tree is loaded as a flat array of elements and then they are "fed manually" to the $children array of each element by the setupTreeFromFlatCollection method - when the getChildren() method is called on any of the entities in the tree (including the root element), Doctrine (NOT knowing about this 'manual' approach) sees the element as "NOT INITIALIZED" and so executes an SQL to fetch all its related children from the database.
So I dissected the ObjectHydrator class (\Doctrine\ORM\Internal\Hydration\ObjectHydrator) and I followed (sort of) the dehydration process and I got to a $reflFieldValue->setInitialized(true); #line:369 which is a method on the \Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection class setting the $initialized property on the class true/false. So I tried and IT WORKS!!!
Doing a ->setInitialized(true) on each of the entities returned by the getResult() method of the queryBuilder (using the HYDRATE_OBJECT === ObjectHydrator) and then calling ->getChildren() on the entities now do NOT trigger any further SQLs!!!
Integrating it in the code of WpmMenuRepository, it becomes:
public function setupTree() {
$qb = $this->createQueryBuilder("res");
/** #var $res Array */
$res = $qb->select("res")->orderBy('res.level', 'DESC')->addOrderBy('res.name','DESC')->getQuery()->getResult();
/** #var $prop ReflectionProperty */
$prop = $this->getClassMetadata()->reflFields["children"];
foreach($res as &$entity) {
$prop->getValue($entity)->setInitialized(true);//getValue will return a \Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection
}
/** #var $treeRoot WpmMenu */
$treeRoot = array_pop($res);
$treeRoot->setupTreeFromFlatCollection($res);
return($treeRoot);
}
And that's all!
Add the annotation to your association to enable eager loading. This should allow you to load the entire tree with only 1 query, and avoid having to reconstruct it from a flat array.
Example:
/**
* #ManyToMany(targetEntity="User", mappedBy="groups", fetch="EAGER")
*/
The annotation is this one but with the value changed
https://doctrine-orm.readthedocs.org/en/latest/tutorials/extra-lazy-associations.html?highlight=fetch
You can't solve this problem if using adjacent list. Been there, done that. The only way is to use nested-set and then you would be able to fetch everything you need in one single query.
I did that when I was using Doctrine1. In nested-set you have root, level, left and right columns which you can use to limit/expand fetched objects. It does require somewhat complex subqueries but it is doable.
D1 documentation for nested-set is pretty good, I suggest to check it and you will understand the idea better.
This is more like a completion and more cleaner solution, but is based on the accepted answer...
The only thing needed is a custom repository that is going to query the flat tree structure, and then, by iterating this array it will, first mark the children collection as initialized and then will hydratate it with the addChild setter present in the parent entity..
<?php
namespace Domain\Repositories;
use Doctrine\ORM\EntityRepository;
class PageRepository extends EntityRepository
{
public function getPageHierachyBySiteId($siteId)
{
$roots = [];
$flatStructure = $this->_em->createQuery('SELECT p FROM Domain\Page p WHERE p.site = :id ORDER BY p.order')->setParameter('id', $siteId)->getResult();
$prop = $this->getClassMetadata()->reflFields['children'];
foreach($flatStructure as &$entity) {
$prop->getValue($entity)->setInitialized(true); //getValue will return a \Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection
if ($entity->getParent() != null) {
$entity->getParent()->addChild($entity);
} else {
$roots[] = $entity;
}
}
return $roots;
}
}
edit: the getParent() method will not trigger additional queries as long as the relationship is made to the primary key, in my case, the $parent attribute is a direct relationship to the PK, so the UnitOfWork will return the cached entity and not query the database.. If your property doesn't relates by the PK, it WILL generate additional queries.
I have an model with a relation, and I want to instantiate a new object of the relations type.
Example: A person has a company, and I have a person-object: now I
want to create a company-object.
The class of the companyobject is defined in the relation, so I don't think I should need to 'know' that class, but I should be able to ask the person-object to provide me with a new instance of type company? But I don't know how.
This is -I think- the same question as New model object through an association , but I'm using PHPActiveRecord, and not the ruby one.
Reason behind this: I have an abstract superclass person, and two children have their own relation with a type of company object. I need to be able to instantiate the correct class in the abstract person.
A workaround is to get it directly from the static $has_one array:
$class = $this::$has_one[1]['class_name'];
$company = new $class;
the hardcoded number can of course be eliminated by searching for the association-name in the array, but that's still quite ugly.
If there is anyone who knows how this is implemented in Ruby, and how the phpactiverecord implementation differs, I might get some Ideas from there?
Some testing has revealed that although the "search my classname in an array" looks kinda weird, it does not have any impact on performance, and in use it is functional enough.
You can also use build_association() in the relationship classes.
Simplest way to use it is through the Model's __call, i.e. if your relation is something like $person->company, then you could instantiate the company with $company = $person->build_company()
Note that this will NOT also make the "connection" between your objects ($person->company will not be set).
Alternatively, instead of build_company(), you can use create_company(), which will save a new record and link it to $person
In PHPActiveRecord, you have access to the relations array. The relation should have a name an you NEED TO KNOW THE NAME OF THE RELATIONSHIP/ASSOCIATION YOU WANT. It doesn't need to be the classname, but the classname of the Model you're relating to should be explicitly indicated in the relation. Just a basic example without error checking or gritty relationship db details like linking table or foreign key column name:
class Person extends ActiveRecord\Model {
static $belongs_to = array(
array('company',
'class_name' => 'SomeCompanyClass')
);
//general function get a classname from a relationship
public static function getClassNameFromRelationship($relationshipName)
foreach(self::$belongs_to as $relationship){
//the first element in all relationships is it's name
if($relationship[0] == $relationshipName){
$className = null;
if(isset($relationship['class_name'])){
$className = $relationship['class_name'];
}else{
// if no classname specified explicitly,
// assume the clasename is the relationship name
// with first letter capitalized
$className = ucfirst($relationship);
}
return $className
}
}
return null;
}
}
To with this function, if you have a person object and want an object defined by the 'company' relationship use:
$className = $person::getClassNameFromRelationship('company');
$company = new $className();
I'm currently using below solution. It's an actual solution, instead
of the $has_one[1] hack I mentioned in the question. If there is a
method in phpactiverecord I'm going to feel very silly exposing
msyelf. But please, prove me silly so I don't need to use this
solution :D
I am silly. Below functionality is implemented by the create_associationname call, as answered by #Bogdan_D
Two functions are added. You should probably add them in the \ActiveRecord\Model class. In my case there is a class between our classes and that model that contains extra functionality like this, so I put it there.
These are the 2 functions:
public function findClassByAssociation($associationName)
Called with the name of the association you are looking for.
Checks three static vars (has_many,belongs_to and has_one) for the association
calls findClassFromArray if an association is found.
from the person/company example: $person->findClassByAssociation('company');
private function findClassFromArray($associationName,$associationArray)
Just a worker-function that tries to match the name.
Source:
/**
* Find the classname of an explicitly defined
* association (has_one, has_many, belongs_to).
* Unsure if this works for standard associations
* without specific mention of the class_name, but I suppose it doesn't!
* #todo Check if works without an explicitly set 'class_name', if not: is this even possible (namespacing?)
* #todo Support for 'through' associations.
* #param String $associationName the association you want to find the class for
* #return mixed String|false if an association is found, return the class name (with namespace!), else return false
* #see findClassFromArray
*/
public function findClassByAssociation($associationName){
//$class = $this::$has_one[1]['class_name'];
$that = get_called_class();
if(isset($that::$has_many)){
$cl = $this->findClassFromArray($associationName,$that::$has_many);
if($cl){return $cl;}
}
if(isset($that::$belongs_to)){
$cl = $this->findClassFromArray($associationName,$that::$belongs_to);
if($cl){return $cl;}
}
if(isset($that::$has_one)){
$cl = $this->findClassFromArray($associationName,$that::$has_one);
if($cl){return $cl;}
}
return false;
}
/**
* Find a class in a php-activerecord "association-array". It probably should have a specifically defined class name!
* #todo check if works without explicitly set 'class_name', and if not find it like standard
* #param String $associationName
* #param Array[] $associationArray phpactiverecord array with associations (like has_many)
* #return mixed String|false if an association is found, return the class name, else return false
* #see findClassFromArray
*/
private function findClassFromArray($associationName,$associationArray){
if(is_array($associationArray)){
foreach($associationArray as $association){
if($association['0'] === $associationName){
return $association['class_name'];
}
}
}
return false;
}