I'm stuck with one SQL query. I have two tables:
users
________________________
| id | company | worker|
-------------------------
| 1 | my comp | John |
tasks
_________________________
| id | name | company |
-------------------------
| 1 | exm | my comp |
My problem is that I want to show tasks of these companies which worker is John. I'm in trouble in that for hours but I don't know how to do it. Is there any SQL query to do that?
You can do a simple join using company column from both tables and use where clause to filter results for John
SELECT t.*
FROM users u
JOIN tasks t USING(company)
WHERE u.worker ='John'
You want use the inner join tag. Just a modification on the other queries mentioned for better clarity.
SELECT task.name,user.worker,user.company
FROM tasks as task INNER JOIN users as user
ON user.company=task.company
WHERE user.worker='John';
You can do a simple join like...
$qry = "SELECT u.id,u.company,u.worker,t.id,t.name,t.company FROM users as u JOIN tasks as t ON u.company = t.company WHERE u.worker = 'John'";
Related
So I have the following tables
**accounts**
id | iban
1 | ES80 2310 0001 1800 0001 2345
2 | ES91 2100 0418 4502 0005 1332
**acc_rel**
account_id | target_table | target_id
1 | users | 2
2 | clients | 5
**users**
id | username | password
2 | abc | cba
**clients**
id | company_name
5 | some_name
So the thing is that with acc_rel I have an account related with an user, a client, or whatever other table.
Because of reasons, not my reasons, I can't change this tables or the way they "works".
What I need to do is, retrieve the account information with the username or the company_name from the other tables, I need to do it in a single query so I can use a WHERE to filter, or ORDER BY and LIMIT. At least I think that I need it in a single query to do so.
This would be the perfect output:
account_id | account_owner
1 | abc
2 | some_name
So how can I do it? I don't know which tables I am going to do the JOIN or what column name I need, thought I can know it with PHP before doing the query.
A solution changing all the tables scheme would be appreciated too if the correct way to do this is another.
Based on #knowledge... answer I made this query and it works exactly like I need it.
SELECT AR.account_id,COALESCE(U.username, C.company_name) AS account_owner
FROM accounts AS A
INNER JOIN acc_rel AS AR ON A.id = AR.account_id
LEFT JOIN users AS U ON U.id = AR.target_id AND AR.target_table = 'users'
LEFT JOIN clients AS C ON C.id = AR.target_id AND AR.target_table = 'clients'
It is going to be a pain to maintain if I need to add new tables but well, it works the way I need.
select AR.account_id,COALESCE(U.username,C.company_name) as account_owner
from accounts A
join acc_rel AR on A.id=AR.account_id
left join users U on U.id=AR.traget_id and AR.target_table='user'
left join clients C on C.id=AR.traget_id and AR.target_table='clients'
I'm having trouble figuring out how to write an SQL query to return results from the following table structure.
The first thing I do is get a list of clients that have a status equal to 1 by:
SELECT * FROM clients WHERE status=1
Then I need to get all user email addresses that belong to a client. My plan was to loop through the results of the query above and running multiple queries for each client. As you can see from the table 'client_user_list' a single user can belong to multiple clients.
I tried doing something like this:
SELECT emailaddress
FROM users
INNER JOIN client_user_list ON users.user_id = client_user_list.user_id
WHERE users.client_id = 1
But it failed. As you can see I'm a total novice when it comes to this stuff. Any help would be appreciated, or feel free to point me to an appropriate resource to learn more. I've looked, but I haven't found anything that covers something complex like this.
Additional info: Using foreign keys there are relationships between clients <-> client_user_list and client_user_list <-> users
clients:
|---------------------------------------|
| client_id | client_name | status |
|---------------------------------------|
| 1 | John Doe | 1 |
| 2 | James Doe | 0 |
|---------------------------------------|
client_user_list:
|----------------------|
| client_id | user_id |
|----------------------|
| 1 | 5 |
| 2 | 6 |
| 1 | 6 |
|----------------------|
users:
|---------------------------------------|
| user_id | emailaddress |
|---------------------------------------|
| 5 | notan#email.com |
| 6 | afake#email.com |
|---------------------------------------|
Thanks so much in advance.
I'm not sure if this is your only problem, since you didn't specify what the exact problem is, but the WHERE-clause of your query contains an error. You query should be changed into this:
SELECT DISTINCT emailaddress
FROM users
INNER JOIN client_user_list ON users.user_id = client_user_list.user_id
WHERE client_user_list.client_id = 1
The users table does not have a field called client_id, the client_user_list table does.
You can get the clients with status = 1 and their users with only one query, by joining all three tables:
select clients.client_id, clients.client_name, users.user_id, users.emailaddress
from clients
inner join client_user_list on client_user_list.client_id = clients.client_id
inner join users on client_user_list.user_id = users.user_id
where clients.status = 1
order by clients.client_id, users.user_id
The following command should resolve this issue
I hope it is userful.
select distinct use.emailaddress
from clients cli
inner join client_user_list cul on (cli.client_id=cul.client_id)
inner join users use on (cul.user_id = use.user_id)
where cli.status = 1
I am making something like an announcement board that requires readers to acknowledge that they read it, and was wondering if there is a more efficient way of doing this.
I have 3 Tables on MySQL side:
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
| Announcements | | Acknowledgement | | User |
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
| announce_id | | ack_id | | user_id |
| announce_msg | | announce_id | | user_name |
| ... | | user_id | | ... |
+-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+
When a user "reads" the announcement (by clicking a button), Acknowledgment table will be inserted with the Announcement ID and User ID. When a second user "reads" the same announcement, Acknowledgement table will be inserted again with same Announcement ID and the second User ID and so on...
+--------------------------------+
| Acknowledgement |
+--------+-------------+---------+
| ack_id | announce_id | user_id |
+--------+-------------+---------+
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 4 | 3 | 1 |
| 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 6 | 3 | 2 |
+--------+-------------+---------+
Now to the problem. On the front end, when I list all the announcements on a page, I would have to first query for all the announcements. Then, for each announcement, I would have to do another query for all the users that have read this announcement.
$sql = "select * from Announcements";
$result = $pdo->query($sql);
while ($row = $result->fetch())
{
$announce_id = $row['announce_id'];
$announce_msg = $row['annouce_msg'];
$readers = "";
$sql2 = "select u.user_name from Acknowledgement as a INNER JOIN User as u where announcement_id =".$annouce_id;
$result2 = $pdo->query($sql);
while ($row2 = $result2->fetch())
{
$readers .= $row2['user_name'].", ";
}
echo "id:".$annouce_id.", message:".$announce_msg.", Readers:".$readers;
}
So if there 10 announcements on the page, there will be 10 sub-queries for each announcement. What I have now does the job right now... but what if there is 1000 announcements? Then there will be 1000 sub-queries? Sounds like the database will be really hammered. So I'm hoping there is a better way of doing this.
Also, if 1000 people in the user table reads all 1000 announcements, the acknowledgement table will have 1000x1000 entries. seems like the acknowledgement table will become really really long. Will that be a problem as time goes by?
This is a really rough example of what I'm trying to do but it did take me a long time to write all this. If more details is needed let me know.
There is a better way. You can use a single query with group_concat:
select a.*, group_concat(u.user_name separator ', ') as AllUsers
from Announcements a join
Acknowledgement ak
on a.Announce_Id = ak.Announce_Id join
User u
on u.user_ID = ak.User_ID
group by a.announce_id
This uses the MySQL feature of hidden columns to group by only one column (announce_id) but still pull in a bunch of other columns with no aggregations (everything else pulled in by the "*").
If your purpose here is to filter out the announcements that your current user has read, you can do this an entirely different way. Instead of querying for every announcement, and then finding out all the users that have read those announcements and examining those results to find ones that your use has read and trimming them from the displayed list, you can just query in one go for everything a particular user (or list of users) have not yet read.
Change your query to this:
SELECT * FROM Announcements WHERE Announce_id NOT IN (SELECT ANNOUNCE_ID FROM Acknowledgement WHERE User_ID = <INSERT USER ID HERE>)
That should return all Announcement rows that this particular user has not yet acknowledged. If you change that final WHERE clause to be WHERE User_ID IN () then you can specify a list of user IDs.
EDIT: Given the comment you posted above, you could use this query to get all announcements that have been read by no one:
SELECT * FROM Announcements WHERE Announce_id NOT IN (SELECT ANNOUNCE_ID FROM Acknowledgement WHERE User_ID IN (SELECT User_ID FROM User))
The logic for putting together a query to find announcements that haven't been read by someone (if not everyone) is escaping me right this second.
EDIT THE SECOND: Every announcement, and everyone who has and has not read it, requires use of a different kind of join that you've used above, a FULL OUTER JOIN. Unfortunately MySQL doesn't have that feature IIRC, but it can be simulated with a union query
SELECT A.*, ACK.*, U.* FROM Announcements AS A
INNER JOIN Acknowledgement AS ACK ON A.Announce_ID = ACK.Announce_ID
LEFT OUTER JOIN User AS U ON ACK.User_ID = U.User_ID
WHERE U.User_ID IS NOT NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT A.*, ACK.*, U.* FROM Announcements AS A
LEFT OUTER JOIN Acknowledgement AS ACK ON A.Announce_ID = ACK.Announce_ID
RIGHT OUTER JOIN User AS U ON ACK.User_ID = U.User_ID
I think that should do it. No facilities to test at the moment, of course.
I have a few tables in a MySQL database similar to this setup:
major table
---------------------
| id | name |
|-------------------|
| 0 | Architecture |
| 1 | Biology |
| 2 | Chemistry |
---------------------
college table
----------------------
| id | name |
|--------------------|
| 0 | Georgia Tech |
| 1 | Virginia Tech |
| 2 | Cal Tech |
----------------------
users table
----------------------------------------------
| id | name | major_id | college_id |
|--------------------------------------------|
| 0 | John Smith | 2 | 0 |
| 1 | Kevin Lee | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | Matt Anderson | 0 | 2 |
----------------------------------------------
Using PHP, I want to get all the information for a user using a query similar to this:
SELECT * FROM users WHERE name=`$user`
Is there someway for MySQL to automatically link the "major_id" and "college_id" columns to the "major" and "college" tables in a way where the query above would return the appropriate values?
If it is not possible with a single query, would multiple queries slow down performance considerably?
SELECT * FROM users WHERE name='$user'
This query (yours has back ticks around $user, back ticks are for column names, use double/single quotes) will only return values from the users table. You can't make MySQL "automagically" construct your joins. You have to do it explicitly, otherwise, how would you get information only from the users table if you wanted to? Use a JOIN like this:
SELECT users.name AS Username, college.name AS College, major.name AS Major
FROM users
INNER JOIN college ON users.college_id = college.id
INNER JOIN major ON users.major_id = major.id
Limit the retrieved columns by only selecting the ones you really need. So instead of the asterisk, write users.name etc.
The JOIN syntax is described in the MySQL Docs.
Joins are what your looking for, in this case your SQL would be:
SELECT `users`.`name`, `major`.`name`, `college`.`name`
FROM `users` WHERE `users`.`name`='name'
INNER JOIN `major` ON `major`.`id`=`users`.`major_id`
INNER JOIN `college` ON `college`.`id`=`users`.`college_id`
You can also alias your field names so you get something a bit more usable out:
SELECT `users`.`name` AS `applicant_name`, `major`.`name` AS `major_name`, `college`.`name` AS `college_name`
FROM `users` WHERE `users`.`name`='name'
INNER JOIN `major` ON `major`.`id`=`users`.`major_id`
INNER JOIN `college` ON `college`.`id`=`users`.`college_id`
More on Joins at http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/join.html
i have a form that has a multiple select drop down. a user can select more than one options in the select. the name of the select is array[]; using php I call implode(",",$array)
in mysql db, it stores the field as a text in this format "places"= "new york, toronto, london" when i want to display these fields i explode the commas.
I am trying to run a report to display the places. here is my select:
"select * from mytable where db.places .. userSelectedPlaces"
how can i check toronto in lists of "places" that user selected? note "places" in the db might be either just "toronto" or it might be comma separated lists of places like "ny, toronto, london, paris, etc".
If it is possible, you would be much better off using another table to hold the places that the user has selected. Call it SelectedPlaces with columns:
mytable_id - To join back to the table in your query
place - EG: "Toronto"
Then you can run a simple query to figure out if Toronto has been selected:
SELECT *
FROM mytable m
INNER JOIN SelectedPlaces sp ON sp.mytable_id = m.id
WHERE sp.place = 'Toronto'
If I understand you correctly, your database design is just wrong. Try reading about it more. Generally, in good design you should not have lists of values as one field in database and you should introduce new table for it.
But if you want to do it this way, you can use strcmp function.
If i understood correctly, this should work:
WHERE DB.PLACES LIKE '%TORONTO%'
but as other users said, its not a nice thing to have denormalized tables.
To directly answer your question, your query needs to look something like this
SELECT *
FROM mytable
WHERE places LIKE( '%toronto%' )
But, be aware, that LIKE() is slow.
To indirectly answer your question, your database schema is all wrong. That is not the right way to do a M:N (many-to-many) relationship.
Imagine instead you had this
mytable place mytable_place
+------------+ +----------+----------+ +------------+----------+
| mytable_id | | place_id | name | | mytable_id | place_id |
+------------+ +----------+----------+ +------------+----------+
| 1 | | 1 | new york | | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | | 2 | toronto | | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | | 3 | london | | 1 | 3 |
+------------+ +----------+----------+ | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 1 |
| 3 | 3 |
+------------+----------+
The table mytable_places is what's called a lookup table (or, xref/cross-reference table, or correlation table). Its only job is to keep track of which mytable records have which place records, and vice versa.
From this example we can see that The 1st mytable record has all 3 places, the 2nd has only toronto, and the 3rd has new york and london.
This opens you up too all sorts of queries that would be difficult, expensive, or impossible with your current design.
Want to know how many mytable records have toronto? No problem
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM mytable_place x
LEFT JOIN place p
ON p.place_id = x.place_id
WHERE p.name = 'toronto';
How about the number of mytable records per place, sorted?
SELECT p.name
, COUNT(*) as `count`
FROM mytable_place x
LEFT JOIN place p
ON p.place_id = x.place_id
GROUP BY p.place_id
ORDER BY `count` DESC, p.name ASC
And these are going to be much faster than any query using LIKE since they can use indexes on columns such as place.name.